Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Annexure I
Annexure I
There are some language errors in the thesis. The following are only some sample. Please
check for similar errors.
Chapter 2
Chapter 3
Chapter 4
o General
The method of evaluation – especially what is the training data set and what is the
test data set is not clear? Explain clearly the interrelationships between symptoms
of LD, their relative importance and significance in the classification. The reason
for the poor performance of some algorithms against others – is this due to the
general nature of the algorithms or is this due to the nature of data?
Chapter 5
o Page 116 – Explain clearly how the number of attributes get reduced from 16 to 7?
o General
What is the rationale behind imputing missing values? Explain how the nature of your
data set and the analysis of performance in Chapter 4 made you choose the methods
for improving performance described in this chapter. Why were improvement
methods applied only to NN and J48 and not to the other classifications?
Chapter 6
o Page 143 – How does the use of linguistic variables reduce complexity?
Chapter 8
o What are your contributions in the directions of developing new algorithms, use of
existing algorithms and models for LD data and in general in LD detection.
o A major part of the thesis uses existing algorithms for LD detection – therefore
analysis and justification of results is very important.
In order to publish the thesis, additional parameters need to be used and in addition a
section on clear analysis of the results need to be added.