Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Willoughby 1
Bailey Willoughby
The case given was reportedly about a school prohibiting the attire involving gang
symbols including jewelry, emblems, earrings, and athletic caps. A student named Bill Foster
was not related in any gang activity but wore an earring to school thinking it would impress the
ladies. He then got suspended from school because of his actions. He ended up filing a lawsuit as
well. The school was very well-known for gang affiliation. In order to find out whether or not
Bill’s freedom of expression rights were violated, both sides will be needed to look into. The
sides that I will be researching are the school’s, Bill’s, the law and I will stand as an outside
In order for a school to remain as safe as possible, safety precautions will be made while
keeping the student’s best interest in mind. In a case famously named Tinker Vs. Des Moines
Independent School District involved students coming to school wearing black armbands to
protest against the Vietnam War. After this case, the court had to put in. Schools are able to limit
students expression if there is an actual concern regarding students being a distraction or other
students learning environment. This case represents a write two schools having their own
policies regarding the dress code of students. For example, Bill Foster's School their policy was
no gang affiliated clothing was allowed. Their reasoning for having this policy put in place is
because of the well-known gang affiliations that occur within the school. It seems as though the
school is just wanting their students to be safe. If the gang affiliation wasn't as big of a deal in
that area then perhaps they could have lightened up on their policy.
In regards to Bill Foster's side of the story, I can understand the frustration coming from
his end. The fact that he is in affiliated with any gang, but was still sentenced to a suspension
Artifact #4 EDU 210
Willoughby 3
after wearing an earring is a very unfavorable situation. Implementing a dress code has a very
thin line of also impeding on our first amendment right which is freedom of expression.
According to mtsu.edu, “If school officials attempt to punish students who exercise their
expressive rights by wearing buttons, writing on fingernails, or protest messages on shirts, they
could find themselves slapped with protected-speech or petition action lawsuits.” This means
that students do still have wiggle room to express themselves well into their rights. Your rights
do not stop once you step onto school grounds. Bill Foster is aware of his rights and took it to the
next level in order to exercise them by filing a lawsuit. This is similar to the situation of Jacobs
Vs. Clark County School District. The case involved the district regulating dress code for the
student’s safety, creating a positive student environment. Kimberly Jacobs consistently went
against the dress code which was khakis, and a solid polo shirt. She wore graphic shirts that
stated her religious beliefs. She believed that the dress code violated their first amendment rights
The First Amendment regards the Freedom of Religion, Speech, and the Press. In
specifics, it also states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press, or the
right of the people peaceably to assemble and to petition the government for a redress of
giving citizens the freedom to express themselves. It is stretched out to letting people be open
about their religion as well as having the freedom of the press. This is inclusive to social media.
In regards to the dress code, students still have their freedom of expression as long as it does not
violate the educational learning environment. Bethel School District vs. Fraser which allowed the
Artifact #4 EDU 210
Willoughby 4
school to punish a student who gave an extremely vulgar speech before a school assembly. This
case gives an example of allowing schools to give consequences to students who are disrupting
educational environments.
When reading the case I was more on the side of the school. I did a lot of research
regarding the dress code, and the first amendment. The school was right to suspend Bill. He was
breaking school policy that was put into place for the safety of the students. As the case stated,
the school placed the dress code for a good reason. Even though Bill stated that he was not
affiliated with a gang, other gang members do not know that. It could bring harm to not only Bill
but the students of the school as well. I feel as though having a uniform put into place will help
students become less violent. Having a dress code in school helps prepare students for the future
After doing extensions research about the different sides of the case I have come to the
conclusion that Bill Foster’s Freedom of Expression rights were not violated. Bill needs to see
the bigger picture that is not just about him. The policy is put in place to provide safety for
everyone, not just him. If a gang member saw him with the earrings then it could result in major
issues. Bill needs to do his own research and see the situation from the other angles. The dress
code, in this case, goes beyond the first amendment, but to the safety of the chiildren of the
future.
Artifact #4 EDU 210
Willoughby 5
Work Cited
May 12, 2. A. (2008, May 12). Jacobs v. Clark County School District. Retrieved April 04,
https://education.findlaw.com/student-rights/school-dress-codes.html
https://constitutingamerica.org/bill-of-rights/?gclid=CjwKCAjw-ZvlBRBbEiwANw9UWiHBUR
zCMob051IdYckt35MgPuq18oNl0fFW2AA2DgpOmkEtEoMB9hoCIXQQAvD_BwE#toggle-id
-2