Professional Documents
Culture Documents
General Supervision
KPMG Risk Advisory Services Ltda
CEBDS - Conselho Empresarial Brasileiro para o Desenvolvimento (Brazilian Business Council
for Sustainable Development)
Translation
Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais - CEMIG
Sponsorship:
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
04
WHAT IS CEBDS ? 06
WHAT IS CTCLIMA? 07
INTRODUCTION 09
PROJECT 11
RESULTS 14
LESONS LEARNED 16
CONCLUSIONS 17
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
This program is an important tool for the companies that have realized that the
majority of the GHG emissions they produce come from their supply chain, as is
shown in the inventory analyses published by the GHG Protocol program.
Therefore, it is ever more important to manage emissions in the value chain, since
in innumerous industries a large part of the carbon footprint from services or
products comes from suppliers.
In this context, strategies for closer relationships with suppliers and even for
building capacities for the management of emissions by the companies are now
ongoing. Some of them have already established that, in the near future, one of
the criteria for procuring services or products will be the preparation of the
inventory and the control of greenhouse gas emissions. The idea is to bring
together the largest number of suppliers member companies have in common.
The goal is to sensibilize suppliers with respect to climate change and the need to
produce inventories and, then, built capacities among supplies towards that goal.
The second edition of the Program for Carbon Management in the Supply Chain,
in addition to having reached its goals, reinforces the possibility of replicating,
increasing and continuing the project.
CARBON M ANAGEMENT
I N THE VALUE CHAIN
04
PROGRAM
MESSAGE FROM
THE PRESIDENT
CEBDS President
CARBON M ANAGEMENT
I N THE VALUE CHAIN 05
PROGRAM
What is CEBDS?
CEBDS brings together major business groups in Brazil, with a total turnover
equal to nearly 40% of the country’s GDP and responsible for more than 1
million direct employment positions in the country. The first institution in
Brazil to talk about sustainability from the perspective of the Triple Bottom
Line, which proposes initiatives by companies based on three pillars:
economic, social and environmental, CEBDS is the Brazilian representative
at the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), the
most important entity in the global corporate world and one which relies
on almost 60 national and regional councils in 36 different countries and
22 industry sectors, in addition to 200 multinational companies with
activities on all continents.
CARBON M ANAGEMENT
I N THE VALUE CHAIN 06
PROGRAM
What is CTClima?
M ISSION:
O BJECTIVES:
REPRESENTATIVES (2013-2015):
CARBON M ANAGEMENT
I N THE VALUE CHAIN 07
PROGRAM
INTRODUCTION
In 2008, CEBDS - the Brazilian Business Council Climate change and the accounting of
for Sustainable Development - adapted the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions are more
World Resources Institute (WRI) methodology, and more important in organizations'
the GHG Protocol, to the domestic agendas, including their indirect emissions,
environment in partnership with The Center for which result from sources that do not belong
Sustainability Studies (GVces) of the Business to or are not controlled by the company.
Administration School of Fundação Getúlio Therefore, it is more and more important to
Vargas and the the Brazilian Ministry of the manage emissions in the value chain, since a
Environment. Today it is the most widely utilized large part of the carbon footprint from
methodology in companies and services and products is generated by
governmental institutions for producing suppliers in several business sectors.
greenhouse gas (GHG) inventories. Its
importance in the domestic scene has
become so great that today, only three years
after the council’s establishment with 27
companies, the number of companies that
officially publish their inventories has increased
by 300% - even without any binding
regulations or incentives driving companies to
do so.
IT IS BECOMING MORE AND MORE
However, improved figures do not refer IMPORTANT TO MANAGE EMISSIONS IN
exclusively to the number of companies THE VALUE CHAIN, SINCE IN MANY
publishing their inventories, but also to the BUSINESS FIELDS, A LARGE PART OF THE
refinement of the inventories. When assessing CARBON FOOTPRINT FROM SERVICES AND
their emission sources, companies end up PRODUCTS IS GENERATED BY SUPPLIERS.
learning even more about their own
productive processes, and even about their
suppliers’ productive processes. In fact, one of
the conclusions arrived at through this
assessment process is that, depending on the
type of business the company producing the
inventory is involved in, the majority, or even
the entirety of the emissions do not come from
their productive processes (scope 1), nor are
they a byproduct of the electric energy
generated for that process (scope 2), but
rather they originate in their supply chain
(scope 3), as can be seen in Figure 1.
Scope 1
20%
Scope 3
79% Scope 2
1%
CARBON M ANAGEMENT
I N THE VALUE CHAIN 08
PROGRAM
In this context, strategies aiming at a closer
relationship with suppliers and even building
capacities for emission management by the
companies were already a reality at some
companies. Some of them have even
established that in the very near future the
preparation of inventories and the control of
greenhouse gas emissions shall be part of the
criteria for the procurement of services and
products. With the same goal, CTClima - The
Energy and Climate Change Work–ing Group
MORE THAN 500 SUPPLIERS FROM MEMBER
, with the support of KPMG, offered the COMPANIES WERE LISTED AND INVITED TO DO
opportunity to concentrate these individual SENSIBILIZATION AND CAPACIT BUILDING
efforts into a single project. The idea is to
WORKSHOPS
bring together the largest number of suppliers
that member companies have in common so
as to raise awareness among them regarding
climate change and the need to produce
inventories and, thus, build capacities among
suppliers to do so.
CARBON M ANAGEMENT
I N THE VALUE CHAIN
09
PROGRAM
PROJECT
1 E NROLLMENT OF M EMBER
COMPANIES IN THE PROJECT
2
LISTS OF MAIN SUPPLIERS
OF PARTICIPANT COMPANIES D EFINITION OF
I NVITING SUPPLIERS TO PARTICIPATE
PARTICIPANT SUPPLIERS
IN THE CAPACITY B UILDING (OCT THRU MAR / 2012)
WORKSHOP
3
SENSIBILIZATION WORKSHOPS ON
SENSIBILIZATION CLIMATE CHANGE AND THE
4
PROJECT FOLLOW UP AND MONITORING THE
TECHNICAL SUPPORT FOR PRODUCTION OF I NVENTORIES
THE DEVELOPMENT OF
(APR THRU AUG / 2013)
INVENTORIES
CARBON M ANAGEMENT
I N THE VALUE CHAIN 10
PROGRAM
DEFINITION OF
PARTICIPANT SUPPLIERS
A fter receiving of the list of suppliers, nearly 460 suppliers from several different industries and regions in Brazil
were included in the project and invited to take part in the Capacity Building Workshops. Among these, 101
attended the workshops, a participation level of roughly 22%, which translates into a 39% increase in relation to the
level of engagement in 2012.
SUPPLIERS I NVITED
No. of Suppliers
400
300
363
200
218
100
85
32 16
0 1 Ano
2012 2013
22% 22%
20%
18%
16%
14%
13%
12%
10%
2012 2013
Suppliers’ Engagement
CARBON M ANAGEMENT
I N THE VALUE CHAIN 11
PROGRAM
SENSIBILIZATION AND CAPACITY BUILDING
The two complementary approaches,
sensibilization and capacity building, proved
The sensibilization and capacity building to be important, as these suppliers were
process was done through 4-hour workshops expected to have common characteristics.
held in three state capitals: The first one was their possible lack of
knowledge regarding climate change and
the direct impact it has on society and on
businesses. More important still was
• São Paulo: 2 classes, held on April 09th; sensibilization, since it seemed to be of
• Belo Horizonte: 1 class, held on April 11th; fundamental importance if these suppliers
• Rio de Janeiro: 1 class held on April 16th. were to be able to connect climate change
issues to their businesses’ activities and, of
course, to learn how inventorying their
emissions would impact knowledge of their
These three state capitals were chosen becau-
own business and possible efficiency gains
se of the results obtained in the first edition of
throughout the process. Capacity building, in
the project in 2012, during which most of the
a complementary manner, proved necessary
participating suppliers were concentrated in
since even those who were aware of the issue
São Paulo, Minas Gerais and Rio de Janeiro.
might lack the technical expertise that is
necessary to produce their inventories.
SUPPLIERS PARTICIPATING With the main objective of raising awareness
IN THE 2012 PROJECT BY STATE among participants of the need to adapt
4%
2% business management with respect to
4% climate change, these events sought to
4% demonstrate to suppliers the impact their
activities had regarding the issue, and to
SP
6%
show both the direct and indirect
MG
42% RJ
consequences and effects of climate
8% DF change on the diverse sectors of the
PR country’s economy. Risks were pointed out
SC and opportunities and advantages for those
BA
8%
GO
companies that manage their emissions and
PE produce their inventory were listed.
22%
Additionally, as part of the technical training
program for the production of GHG
In the second edition of the project, these inventories, the Workshops introduced the
capital cities' representation remained the Brazil GHG Protocol Program calculation
same. tool, providing training in its use and giving
priority to the definition of the operational
limits, the identification and the classification
of the main sources of emission and the
SUPPLIERS PARTICIPATING categorization of emissions within the three
IN THE 2013 PROJECT BY STATE scopes.
1% 1%
1%
1% 1% To monitor the results and the efficacy of the
1% project, an on-line form was sent to all
1%
2% participants (101 suppliers) following the
3%
2%
SP
Workshops so that they would be able to
MG
analyze the stages of the projects so far. In
RJ these forms suppliers were asked to state
4%
RS their main conclusions and expectations
4% PR
regarding the development (or not) of their
AM
SC
emission inventories.
BA Also, as part of the Workshop follow-up
59%
CE evaluation, 50 out of the 101 participants
19% DF
filled out the feedback form, which
GO
MT corresponded to approximately 50% of the
MS total.
PA CARBON M ANAGEMENT
I N THE VALUE CHAIN 12
PROGRAM
EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE
50% 50%
SCORES
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0
1 2 3 4 5
Quality of Quality of
Sensibilization Information
Workshop for producing
the inventory
CARBON M ANAGEMENT
I N THE VALUE CHAIN 13
PROGRAM
RESULTS
30%
80 68%
CARBON M ANAGEMENT
I N THE VALUE CHAIN 14
PROGRAM
Of the segments with greatest participation in
the project, the one best represented was the
manufacturing industry, which includes
FINALIZED I NVENTORIES companies producing packaging, equipment
for the electrical sector and a variety of other
# of inventories parts and equipment.
35
SECTOR
30 3
25
20 20% 13%
3%
15
30
10
18
5
17%
0
2012 2013
3% 44%
Inventory delivered Inventory being produced
Construction
Gas Distributor
Manufacturing Industry
Mining
A
Service Providers
Transporters
27%
Large
Medium
Small
CARBON M ANAGEMENT
I N THE VALUE CHAIN 15
PROGRAM
LESSONS LEARNED
The main reasons given for not producing inventories listed by suppliers that
participated in the Workshops were:
1 2
TROUBLES IN OBTAINING
L ACK OF PERSONNEL FOR
THE NECESSARY DATA
PRODUCING THE INVENTORIES;
FOR THE CALCULATION OF
EMISSIONS;
3 4
L ACK OF NECESSITY, BE IT DUE TO
COSTS INVOLVING HIRING
THE TYPE OF BUSINESS THEY ARE
PERSONNEL OR SPECIALIZED
IN, OR TO AN UNDERSTANDING
CONSULTING SERVICES;
THAT THE LEVEL OF EMISSIONS
WAS LOW.
CARBON M ANAGEMENT
I N THE VALUE CHAIN 16
PROGRAM
CONCLUSIONS
The Program for Carbon Management in the
Supply Chain achieved the intended However, there are still improvements to be
objectives, especially for two results made to the project. Worth noting is, for
obtained: the first, a more direct and clear example, the importance of greater
one, was the sensibilization and the building involvement by those companies
of capacities among participant participating in the project, firstly by
companies’ suppliers. In this second edition, promoting the participation of suppliers in
the number of suppliers present in the the Workshops and, secondly, by monitoring
workshops rose from 32 in 2012 to 101 in 2013. the inventory production process. This has
Therefore, approximately 10 new proved to be a differentiating advantage.
organizations were engaged per member Another important point is engagement, not
company, while 16 are suppliers in common only by the company’s sustainability area,
to two or more companies, thus expanding but also, and most especially, by the supply
the representation of the members to 143 area. Finally there is the prioritization of
suppliers. suppliers as per size and regional area, and
by level of knowledge, in order to
30 suppliers met the deadline to finalize their differentiate strategies for each type of
emission inventories and at 3 companies the supplier.
inventories are currently being produced.
CARBON M ANAGEMENT
I N THE VALUE CHAIN 17
PROGRAM
Sponsorship: