Carstensen and Fredrickson (1998) tested socioemotional selectivity theory by studying a large ethnically diverse sample of adults aged 18 to 88. They aimed to see if older adults focus on enhancing current emotional experiences, while younger adults focus on future possibilities like meeting new people. Participants rated dimensions of importance for different types of people. Results supported the hypothesis that older adults prioritize current emotions over future opportunities.
Carstensen and Fredrickson (1998) tested socioemotional selectivity theory by studying a large ethnically diverse sample of adults aged 18 to 88. They aimed to see if older adults focus on enhancing current emotional experiences, while younger adults focus on future possibilities like meeting new people. Participants rated dimensions of importance for different types of people. Results supported the hypothesis that older adults prioritize current emotions over future opportunities.
Carstensen and Fredrickson (1998) tested socioemotional selectivity theory by studying a large ethnically diverse sample of adults aged 18 to 88. They aimed to see if older adults focus on enhancing current emotional experiences, while younger adults focus on future possibilities like meeting new people. Participants rated dimensions of importance for different types of people. Results supported the hypothesis that older adults prioritize current emotions over future opportunities.
For example, Carstensen and Fredrickson (1998) tested
socioemotional selectivity theory in a study involving a large and ethnically diverse sample of adults ranging in age from 18 to 88 years. Their goal was to test the hypothesis that older adults would focus their attention on the enhancement of current emotional experiences, whereas younger adults would focus on possibilities for the future, such as meeting new people from whom they could learn new things about the world. To test this idea, they gave younger- and older-adult research participants a long list of different types of people (e.g., a long-time close friend, the author of a book just read). They asked the participants to make ratings that would reveal the dimensions (i.e., the features that differentiated the individuals in the list) that were most important to them as they thought about the different people on the list. Research supports this hypothesis. For example, Carstensen and Fredrickson (1998) tested socioemotional selectivity theory in a study involving a large and ethnically diverse sample of adults ranging in age from 18 to 88 years. Their goal was to test the hypothesis that older adults would focus their attention on the enhancement of current emotional experiences, whereas younger adults would focus on possibilities for the future, such as meeting new people from whom they could learn new things about the world. To test this idea, they gave younger- and older-adult research participants a long list of different types of people (e.g., a long-time close friend, the author of a book just read). They asked the participants to make ratings that would reveal the dimensions (i.e., the features that differentiated the individuals in the list) that were most important to them as they thought about the different people on the list. Research supports this hypothesis. For example, Carstensen and Fredrickson (1998) tested socioemotional selectivity theory in a study involving a large and ethnically diverse sample of adults ranging in age from 18 to 88 years. Their goal was to test the hypothesis that older adults would focus their attention on the enhancement of current emotional experiences, whereas younger adults would focus on possibilities for the future, such as meeting new people from whom they could learn new things about the world. To test this idea, they gave younger- and older-adult research participants a long list of different types of people (e.g., a long-time close friend, the author of a book just read). They asked the participants to make ratings that would reveal the dimensions (i.e., the features that differentiated the individuals in the list) that were most important to them as they thought about the different people on the list. Research supports this hypothesis. For example, Carstensen and Fredrickson (1998) tested socioemotional selectivity theory in a study involving a large and ethnically diverse sample of adults ranging in age from 18 to 88 years. Their goal was to test the hypothesis that older adults would focus their attention on the enhancement of current emotional experiences, whereas younger adults would focus on possibilities for the future, such as meeting new people from whom they could learn new things about the world. To test this idea, they gave younger- and older-adult research participants a long list of different types of people (e.g., a long-time close friend, the author of a book just read). They asked the participants to make ratings that would reveal the dimensions (i.e., the features that differentiated the individuals in the list) that were most important to them as they thought about the different people on the list. Research supports this hypothesis. For example, Carstensen and Fredrickson (1998) tested socioemotional selectivity theory in a study involving a large and ethnically diverse sample of adults ranging in age from 18 to 88 years. Their goal was to test the hypothesis that older adults would focus their attention on the enhancement of current emotional experiences, whereas younger adults would focus on possibilities for the future, such as meeting new people from whom they could learn new things about the world. To test this idea, they gave younger- and older-adult research participants a long list of different types of people (e.g., a long-time close friend, the author of a book just read). They asked the participants to make ratings that would reveal the dimensions (i.e., the features that differentiated the individuals in the list) that were most important to them as they thought about the different people on the list. Research supports this hypothesis. For example, Carstensen and Fredrickson (1998) tested socioemotional selectivity theory in a study involving a large and ethnically diverse sample of adults ranging in age from 18 to 88 years. Their goal was to test the hypothesis that older adults would focus their attention on the enhancement of current emotional experiences, whereas younger adults would focus on possibilities for the future, such as meeting new people from whom they could learn new things about the world. To test this idea, they gave younger- and older-adult research participants a long list of different types of people (e.g., a long-time close friend, the author of a book just read). They asked the participants to make ratings that would reveal the dimensions (i.e., the features that differentiated the individuals in the list) that were most important to them as they thought about the different people on the list. Research supports this hypothesis. For example, Carstensen and Fredrickson (1998) tested socioemotional selectivity theory in a study involving a large and ethnically diverse sample of adults ranging in age from 18 to 88 years. Their goal was to test the hypothesis that older adults would focus their attention on the enhancement of current emotional experiences, whereas younger adults would focus on possibilities for the future, such as meeting new people from whom they could learn new things about the world. To test this idea, they gave younger- and older-adult research participants a long list of different types of people (e.g., a long-time close friend, the author of a book just read). They asked the participants to make ratings that would reveal the dimensions (i.e., the features that differentiated the individuals in the list) that were most important to them as they thought about the different people on the list. Research supports this hypothesis. For example, Carstensen and Fredrickson (1998) tested socioemotional selectivity theory in a study involving a large and ethnically diverse sample of adults ranging in age from 18 to 88 years. Their goal was to test the hypothesis that older adults would focus their attention on the enhancement of current emotional experiences, whereas younger adults would focus on possibilities for the future, such as meeting new people from whom they could learn new things about the world. To test this idea, they gave younger- and older-adult research participants a long list of different types of people (e.g., a long-time close friend, the author of a book just read). They asked the participants to make ratings that would reveal the dimensions (i.e., the features that differentiated the individuals in the list) that were most important to them as they thought about the different people on the list. Research supports this hypothesis. For example, Carstensen and Fredrickson (1998) tested socioemotional selectivity theory in a study involving a large and ethnically diverse sample of adults ranging in age from 18 to 88 years. Their goal was to test the hypothesis that older adults would focus their attention on the enhancement of current emotional experiences, whereas younger adults would focus on possibilities for the future, such as meeting new people from whom they could learn new things about the world. To test this idea, they gave younger- and older-adult research participants a long list of different types of people (e.g., a long-time close friend, the author of a book just read). They asked the participants to make ratings that would reveal the dimensions (i.e., the features that differentiated the individuals in the list) that were most important to them as they thought about the different people on the list. Research supports this hypothesis. For example, Carstensen and Fredrickson (1998) tested socioemotional selectivity theory in a study involving a large and ethnically diverse sample of adults ranging in age from 18 to 88 years. Their goal was to test the hypothesis that older adults would focus their attention on the enhancement of current emotional experiences, whereas younger adults would focus on possibilities for the future, such as meeting new people from whom they could learn new things about the world. To test this idea, they gave younger- and older-adult research participants a long list of different types of people (e.g., a long-time close friend, the author of a book just read). They asked the participants to make ratings that would reveal the dimensions (i.e., the features that differentiated the individuals in the list) that were most important to them as they thought about the different people on the list. Research supports this hypothesis. For example, Carstensen and Fredrickson (1998) tested socioemotional selectivity theory in a study involving a large and ethnically diverse sample of adults ranging in age from 18 to 88 years. Their goal was to test the hypothesis that older adults would focus their attention on the enhancement of current emotional experiences, whereas younger adults would focus on possibilities for the future, such as meeting new people from whom they could learn new things about the world. To test this idea, they gave younger- and older-adult research participants a long list of different types of people (e.g., a long-time close friend, the author of a book just read). They asked the participants to make ratings that would reveal the dimensions (i.e., the features that differentiated the individuals in the list) that were most important to them as they thought about the different people on the list.