You are on page 1of 7

Portal Frame Bridges in Japan: State of the Art Report

Nobumasa Iwasaki, P.E.Jp, Fukken Co., LTD., Osaka, Japan; Shinji Tenma, P.E.Jp, Fukken Co., LTD., Hiroshima, Japan and
Akimitsu Kurita, Prof., Dr., Dept. of Civil Engineering and Urban Design, Faculty of Engineering, Osaka Institute of Technology,
Osaka, Japan. Contact: kurita@civil.oit.ac.jp
DOI: 10.2749/101686611X12994961034093

Abstract Brief History and the Number


In Japan, the portal frame bridge (PFB) has been exclusively used in lieu
of Completed PFBs
of the integral abutment bridge (IAB) from about 1995. In the design of the Various framed steel or concrete
PFB, the structural detailing of the girder–abutment connection becomes very bridges of short and medium span
important. Up to now, some structural details for girder–abutment connections lengths, which were designed as the
have been proposed for bridges constructed in Japan. forerunners of PFB and IAB, can also
A brief history and a few completed PFBs are reported in this paper. The focus be seen in Japan. Framed steel or con-
lies on PFB with steel composite girders in roadways. Some typical structural crete bridges have expansion joints or
details of the girder–abutment connection and few constructed examples are both expansion joints and bearings.
introduced and discussed. A new type of approach slab, which has shear projec- Accordingly, those bridges require sig-
tions on its upper surface, has been developed in Japan and there are already nificant maintenance. To avoid main-
some applied examples. A finite element analysis of the interaction among soil, tenance and also to reduce the initial
asphalt pavement and approach slab was conducted and the results are reported construction cost, IABs were devel-
and discussed in comparison with the conventional design. oped mainly in the United States.1–4
Keywords: portal frame bridge; roadway bridge; steel composite girder; approach The PFB and IAB are defined as a
slab with shear projection; completed bridge example; prospect of integral bridge type with no expansion joints
abutment bridge. and bearings. An IAB is composed of
the bridge girder, the reinforced con-
crete abutment with a small depth
and flexible piles. Therefore a hinged
Introduction for the design of the substructure,
connection can be assumed at the
both the allowable stress design
The jointless bridge type, such as connecting part between the super-
method and the ultimate strength
the portal frame bridge (PFB) or the and substructures in the design of
method are applied depending on
integral abutment bridge (IAB), has the IAB. On the other hand, in case
the magnitude of the earthquake. In
obvious advantages with respect to of PFB, a rigid connection is applied
the near future, these methods will
construction and maintenance costs, in the design, because this bridge is
be unified as the limit state design
driving quality and earthquake resis- constructed by using a stiff concrete
method.
tance. However, till 1995, this type of abutment and a footing with or without
bridge was nearly not adopted in Japan The paper presents the history and piles.
because of the complicated response brief reports of completed PFBs col-
Since 1995, PFBs have been exclu-
behaviour during earthquake, and fur- lected from background information.
sively applied in Japan instead of
ther, there existed no design concept Next, focusing on the PFBs using
IABs. The main reasons for replacing
for PFB and IAB. steel composite girders in roadways,
IAB by PFB in Japan are as follows:
some typical structural details of the
From about 1995, the PFB has been girder–abutment connection and some
exclusively designed in Japan in con- 1. Response behaviour of IABs dur-
constructed examples are introduced
trast to the IAB. Design of the rigid ing a strong earthquake has not yet
and discussed herein. In order to
frame bridge with expansion joints been studied thoroughly.
maintain the comfort level for driv-
and/or bearings brought in valuable 2. There is no suitable design concept
ing of vehicles, approach slabs are
information and experience. for IAB.
installed at both ends of the PFB. A
3. Traditionally two companies share
A performance-based design method new type of approach slab, which has
the construction efforts where one
is adopted for designing of bridges shear projections on its upper sur-
company gets the substructure
in Japan. In this design method, the face, has been developed in Japan and
and the other company gets the
allowable stress is applied for check- there are already some constructed
superstructure.
ing the safety of superstructures examples. The finite element (FE)
with span lengths up to 200 m. But analysis results of the interaction So far 19 PFBs and one IAB have
between soil, the asphalt pavement been completed in Japan. Table 1
and the approach slab are reported shows major constructed examples
and discussed in comparison with the of PFB and the only example of an
Peer-reviewed by international ex-
perts and accepted for publication
regular approach slab. Finally, a new IAB, the Nishihama Overpass. From
by SEI Editorial Board design method for the girder–abut- this survey regarding the com-
ment connection in PFBs is proposed pleted PFB and IAB s t r u c t u r e s in
Paper received: November 8, 2010 and the prospect of IABs in Japan is Japan, it was found that there exist
Paper accepted: January 17, 2011 presented. almost as many bridges having steel

290 Scientific Paper Structural Engineering International 3/2011


Completed Bridge name Number of Type of superstructure Bridge length (m) Type of connector Place of construction
year spans
1996 Ofukishi 1 Steel I-girder 42 Stud Hokkaido
River Bridge (multiple girder)
1996 Otamoi River 3 PC T-girder 101,5 — Hokkaido
Bridge
2000 Nishihama 1 Steel I-girder 29 Perforated steel Hyogo
Overpass (Multiple girder) plate
2000 Shirarika 3 PC box-girder 96,2 — Hokkaido
River Bridge
2003 Shikibuto 1 Steel I-girder (twin 50 Stud Mie
third bridge girder)
2004 Nakataharuki 1 Steel I-girder 45,5 Perforated steel Yamagata
River Bridge (multiple girder) plate
2006 Shimotani ike 1 Steel I-girder 45 Perforated steel Wakayama
Bridge (multiple girder) flange and web
plates
Table 1: Major constructed examples of PFB in Japan5

composite girder as superstructure as 42 000


bridges having prestressed concrete 2000 2000
girder as superstructure. Evaluation
of these constructed bridges shows
the structural design features in case
of steel composite girder application.
12 000

Hereafter, this paper deals with PFBs

12000
having a steel composite girder as the
superstructure.

Three Constructed Examples


(a)
of PFB 1500 900

It is obvious that the most important Headed studs (f 22 × 150)


11 900
point in the plan of the PFB is how

34
to design the girder–abutment con-

2100
nection in order to transfer bending
3300

moment, shear force and normal force.


2100

34
300
Based on the constructed examples of
PFB in Japan5, the girder–abutment
1450 3 × 3000 = 9000 1450 Steel member
connection detailing is classified into
three groups with regard to the con- (b)
nection type: the headed stud, the
3550

perforated steel plate and the per-


forated steel flange and web plates. (c)
The connection type using perfo-
rated steel plates is based on the
idea of a concrete dowel. The use Fig. 1: Ofukishi River Bridge: (a) side view; (b) cross-sectional view; (c) detail of the
of headed studs is common practice corner6 (Units: mm)
in composite design of steel–concrete
members.
the abutment are connected at both accordance with the ratio of both
Ofukishi River Bridge ends of the steel I-girder. The headed cross sectional areas of the mem-
studs welded on the flange and web bers. The numbers of studs are deter-
This bridge6 was constructed as the plates are used to ensure composite mined by the shared stress resultant
first application of a PFB in Japan. As action between steel and concrete of the concrete member.
shown in Fig. 1 the length and width members. This bridge was completed 2. The bending moment acting at the
of the Ofukishi River Bridge are 42,0 in 1996 in the Hokkaido prefecture. girder–abutment connection is
and 11,9 m respectively. The abutment The design concept of this bridge is as transmitted through the force cou-
of this bridge has a wall thickness of follows: ple generated by the studs welded
2,0 m. The structural detailing of this on the two steel flange plates. Axial
bridge’s girder–abutment connec- 1. The shared stress resultants of and shear forces are transmitted by
tion has a conservative configuration. the steel and concrete members the studs welded on the steel web
Two steel columns to be buried in in the abutment are calculated in plate.

Structural Engineering International 3/2011 Scientific Paper 291


45 500 1. The girder–abutment connection is
2000 2000 assumed simply as a reinforced
structure. Therefore, section C in
Fig. 2c is designed by using the
entire reinforced cross section of
13 800

the abutment. For the design at sec-

13 800
tion A, only the steel cross section is
considered as the resisting member
against external forces.
2. Horizontal axial force and bend-
ing moment are transferred at the
(a) girder–abutment connection by
the resisting forces generated at the
perforated steel plate on the flange
PBL 100 × 25 × 1400
plates. Shear force of the steel girder,
12 950 namely, axial force at the abutment

16
is calculated by the bearing stress of
A B the concrete under the steel girder.
2000
2000

C In order to increase the strength and


28

ductility of the perforated steel plate,


700 5 × 2250 = 11 250 1000
re-bars were inserted into the holes of
(b) (c) this plate.
Fig. 2: Nakataharuki River Bridge: (a) side view; (b) cross-sectional view; (c) detail of steel
girder end 7 (Units: mm) Shimotani ike Bridge
47 000
To achieve a more economical design
2000 2000
for the girder–abutment connection
of the PFB, a first attempt was made
at t h e Shimotani ike Bridge,8,9
where holes for concrete dowels
were directly drilled on the two
10 000

12 000

flange plates and web plate instead of


using a perforated steel plate, as shown
in Fig. 3c. The Shimotani ike Bridge has
(a) a length of 47,0 m and width of 11,5 m.
The wall thickness of the abutment is
2,0 m (same as the precedent).
650 1000
This bridge consists of twin composite
65 3 × 130 5 × 130 155
girders and was completed in 2006 in
11 500 390
the Wakayama prefecture. Figure 4
159,5
43

shows the end detail of this bridge at


4 × 130

the construction site. The design con-


cept of this bridge is as follows:
3000

20 × 130
2919

Holes (f 65) 1. The horizontal force of the girder–


2750 6000 2750
abutment connection is transmitted
to the abutment through the resist-
4 × 130

(b) ing forces generated by the holes in


159,5

the two flange plates and web plate.


38

Temporary
bearing 2. The moment is transmitted through
the resisting forces caused by all
(c)
Fig. 3: Shimotani ike Bridge: (a) side view; (b) cross-sectional view; (c) detail of steel
girder end8 (Units: mm)

Nakataharuki River Bridge Ofukishi River Bridge. The perforated


steel plates (100 × 25 × 1400), where the
Figure 2 shows the general view of the diameter of a hole is 50 mm and hole’s
Nakataharuki River Bridge7, which has lateral spacing is 100 mm, are welded
a length of 45,5 m and width of 12,95 on the upper and lower steel flange
m. The wall thickness of this abut- plates at the ends of the steel I-girder.
ment is 2,0 m. The girder–abutment This bridge was completed in 2004 in
connection detailing of this bridge is the Yamagata prefecture. The following Fig. 4: End detail of the Shimotani ike
very simple compared with that of the basic concept was applied in this design. Bridge8

292 Scientific Paper Structural Engineering International 3/2011


t h e holes in the two flanges and Bridge name
Transmission mechanism of corner forces at the girder-abutment connection
partly by holes in the quarter depth Axial force Bending moment Shearing force
of the web plate.
3. Shear force is transmitted through
the resisting force caused by the Ofukishi river
bridge
holes in the web plate.

The resistance force per one hole


Studs on web Studs on flange Studs on web
(diameter: 65 mm) was evaluated by
using a safety factor of 3,0 for the
ultimate strength obtained from the
test. Bending test results concerning
the ultimate strength per hole with Nakataharuki river
bridge
and without insert rebar were 242 and
168 kN, respectively. Perforated steel plates Perforated steel plates Bearing force of concrete
(PSP) (PSP)

Comparison of Three Design


Concepts Shimotani ike
bridge
Table 2 shows a comparison of the three
design concepts introduced above.
Perforated steel flange plates Perforated steel flanges and web Perforated steel web plate
In the case of the Ofukishi River
Bridge, a conservative structural detail- Table 2: Design concepts for transmission mechanism of corner forces6–8
ing of the girder–abutment connection
was applied. It was the first attempt to
5000
construct a PFB in Japan. 100
400
Concerning the Nakataharuki River 200

Bridge, a new connection method

200
400

was developed and applied, where


20

200 200
perforated steel plates were used as
shear connectors at the girder–abut-
ment connection. By using the perfo-
rated steel plate, a simple structure
at the girder ends and also a ratio-
nal design concept for the girder–
abutment connection were realised for Fig. 5: Approach Slab of Nishihama Overpass10 (Units: mm)
this bridge.
Instead of using the perforated steel A New Approach Slab Finite Element Analyses for
plate as shear connector it is pos-
A rectangular approach slab,10 which
Stress in Asphalt Pavements11
sible to perforate the upper and lower
flange plates as well as the web plate has the same shape as applied in con- In order to clarify the effects of the
directly. This was first attempted at ventional bridges, was used from the approach slab on the stresses of
the Shimotani ike Bridge. It appears first stage onwards to construct the asphalt pavement, FE analyses were
that the design concept of transmit- PFB in Japan. However, the structural carried out for the loading case of
ting the shear force only to the girder– details of the approach slab have temperature. The computer program
abutment connection in this bridge has been constantly improved in order to DIANA was used for numerical
to be improved to a more economical prevent asphalt pavement cracking due analysis. Analysis parameters are the
one. to temperature changes and backfill shapes of the approach slab and the
settlement. Figure 5 shows an improved installed depth of the approach slab.
When the steel composite girders are approach slab where the shear pro- In the analysis, the shape and dimen-
selected as the superstructure, the jections are attached to the slab and sions of the Nishihama Overpass
reinforced concrete slab contains the the thickness of the slab at the tip is approach slab were applied, as
longitudinal re-bars which are very thinner than the rest. Also, the slab is shown in Fig. 5. The approach
effective in interconnecting the girder recessed 400 mm deep into the ground. slab has a length of 5 m and three
and abutment. However, the longitu- Therefore, the strains caused by any shear projections of 200 × 200 mm.
dinal re-bars in the concrete slab have deformations of the abutment are Its surface is inclined towards the
been neglected in the design of the smoothly distributed by the backfill. tip.
girder–abutment connection in PFBs.
Therefore, to improve the designing
method for the girder–abutment con- Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4
nection, longitudinal re-bars should Shear projection Yes No
be taken into account as a mem-
ber producing the resisting couple Installed depth Hg from road surface (mm) 450 650 850 450
moment. Table 3: List of analytical cases

Structural Engineering International 3/2011 Scientific Paper 293


Hg Young’s modulus E Poisson’s ratio µ Unit weight f
(N/mm2) (kN/m3)
Asphalt 9000 0,35 22,5
Roadbed in upper layer 300 0,35 20
Roadbed in lower layer 200 0,35 20
Approach slab 25 000 0,17 24,5
Subgrade 40 0,40 18
Table 4: Properties of materials
Fig. 6: FE analytical model (Case 1)

The installed depth of the approach contact surface between two elements measured over a distance of 7 m from
slab in Nishihama Overpass was 400 was treated as free when tensile stress the edge of bridge are depicted in
mm from the lower surface of the occurred between them. Fig. 9 for Case 1 and Case 4. From the
asphalt pavement. In this analysis, comparison in Fig. 9a and b, it is recog-
Compulsory deformation was applied
three cases regarding the installed nised that the stress distribution of
at the end of the approach slab, consid-
depth were evaluated for the new slab Case 1, where the approach slab has
ering the load case of low temperature,
type, as shown in Table 3. Further, cal- the shear projection, is smoother than
as shown in Fig. 7. In the analysis, the
culation for the approach slab without that of Case 4. The maximum stress of
temperature-induced deformations
shear projection was done to compare about 0,8 N/mm2 is consistent in both
(d) were increased from 1 to 10 mm
the types. cases and the maximum occurs at 5,5
in 1 mm intervals. The deformation of
Figure 6 shows the FE analytical model and 4,7 m from the edge of bridge
d = 10 mm corresponds to the design
for Case 1. It comprises the asphalt for Case 1 and Case 4, respectively.
load case with low temperature and a
pavement, the backfill soil and the These maximum stresses indicate the
bridge length of about 50 m.
approach slab. The mechanical proper- mean values. However, the maximum
ties of all materials were assumed as in stress of 0,86 N/mm2 in Case 1 shows
a slightly smaller value than that of
linear elastic models. Two-dimensional Calculated Results and 0,93N/mm2 in Case 4.
stress analysis was performed by Discussion
using 3-node triangular and 4-node As shown in Fig. 9a, for Case 1 the
quadrilateral iso-parametric plane FE analysis was carried out for four difference between the stresses at the
stress elements and line-interface ele- cases, as shown in Table 3. From the upper and lower surfaces of the asphalt
ment for interactions between the soil calculated results it was found that pavement is not much. Therefore, a
and the approach slab. The FE ana- the maximum stress in the asphalt uniform tensile stress distribution can
lytical model is 15 m long, which is pavement occurred at the point near be assumed as acting throughout the
three times the slab length, and 6 m the approach slab tip. thickness of the asphalt pavement as
deep. Both dimensions were decided a result of the low temperature around
after taking into account the effects Figure 8 shows the relationship between
the bridge. However for Case 4, where
of ground deformation. The FEs of the maximum tensile stresses measured
the approach slab has no shear projec-
the asphalt pavement are divided into at the upper and lower surfaces of the
tion, the stress distribution at the upper
upper and lower layers. The mechani- asphalt pavement and the installed
surface of the asphalt pavement shows
cal properties of all the materials depth of the approach slab with shear
a large change as shown in Fig. 9b.
required for the numerical calculations projection. It is clear from Fig. 8 that
Accordingly, stress resultants of tensile
are listed in Table 4. the tensile stresses of the asphalt pave-
force and local bending moment exist
ment decrease in proportion to the
The boundary condition between the for Case 4. Figure 10a and b shows the
installed depth of the approach slab.
approach slab and soil was treated analytical results of deformation for
as non-linear, that is, the boundary The stress distributions of the asphalt Cases 1 and 4 at the loading condi-
between two elements was restrained pavement along the length and tion of d = 10 mm. From the results
by the upper value of shear stress
obtained from the Mohr’s envelope 0,9
when normal stress in soil was com-
0,8
pressive. On the other hand, the
Horizontal tensile stress (N/mm2)

0,7 Case 1

0,6 Case 2

Compulsory deformation 0,5 Case 3


d
0,4

0,3
6000

0,2 Maximum stress at upper surface of pavement

0,1 Maximum stress at lower surface of pavement

0,0
15 000 400 500 600 700 800 900
Installed depth Hg (mm)
Fig. 7: Compulsory deformation and
boundary conditions (Units: mm) Fig. 8: Maximum tensile stress of asphalt pavement (with shear projection)

294 Scientific Paper Structural Engineering International 3/2011


(a) 0,9 for Case 4 it is found that the gap
0,8 occurs between the back surface of
the abutment and the soil at the left
Horizontal tensile stress (N/mm2)
0,7

0,6
end of the approach slab. But in Case
1, such gap is not seen.
0,5

0,4 Finally, from the two points of view


0,3
regarding the stress distribution gener-
ated in the asphalt pavement and the
0,2
gap that occurred between the back
0,1 Upper surface of pavement
surface of the abutment and the soil,
Lower surface of pavement
0,0 it appears that the adoption of shear
–0,1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
projection for the approach slab is a
Horizontal distance (m) good solution for the design of a PFB.
(b) 0,9 However, additional calculations are
0,8 required for more detailed discussions
concerning the approach slab.
Horizontal tensile stress (N/mm2)

0,7

0,6

0,5
Conclusions
0,4 A state of the art report regarding
0,3 the PFB in Japan was given in this
0,2 paper. The reason why IAB has not
0,1
been developed in Japan in spite of
Upper surface of pavement
numerous constructed examples in the
0,0 Lower surface of pavement
United States1 was also given.
–0,1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Horizontal distance (m)
Three typical structural detailing of
the girder–abutment connection which
Fig. 9: Effects of shear projection for stresses in asphalt pavement (a) Case 1: with shear links the superstructure and substruc-
projection (installed depth Hg = 450 mm); (b) Case 4: without shear projection (installed ture in the PFB, using steel compos-
depth Hg = 450 mm) ite girders were reported in relation
with the design concept. Naturally,
the improvement of structural detail-
ing of the girder–abutment connec-
tion was recognised from recently
constructed PFBs. To arrive at a
more economical solution for the PFB
design it was pointed out that the
longitudinal re-bars in the concrete
slab should be taken into account for
0,8
0,7
the design of the girder–abutment
0,6
0,5
connection, as is done in European
0,4
0,3
0,2
countries.
0,1
0
A new type of approach slab devel-
0,93 mm (a) oped in Japan was introduced and the
results of its numerical calculation by
a FE analytical model were also pre-
sented. The acceptance of this new
approach slab type will influence the
design of PFB or IAB in the future.
With regard to the future develop-
ment of IAB in Japan, behaviour
against seismic motion and low cycle
fatigue at the top of steel piles as a
result of the temperature change are
0,8
important topics to be addressed. It
0,7
0,6 also appears that the semi-IAB, which
0,5
0,4 does not have any specific design
0,3
0,2
0,1
problem, will develop faster than the
0 IAB. All said and done, the jointless
bridges such as PFB, IAB and semi-
(b)
IAB are welcomed by vehicle users
Fig. 10: Deformations in Case 1 and Case 4 at the loading condition of d = 10 mm and road administrations, because of
(a) Case 1: with shear projection (installed depth Hg = 450 mm); (b) Case 4: without comfortable driving and low main-
shear projection (installed depth Hg = 450 mm) tenance costs. The social demand to

Structural Engineering International 3/2011 Scientific Paper 295


construct such bridges, therefore, will [4] Kobayashi A, Nakatani S, Takeguchi M, [8] Sako S, Kiso S. Design and construction of
be on the increase year after year in Yokomaku K. Survey on design criteria and field portal frame bridge where steel girder is embed-
study for integral abutment bridges in US. Civil ded in RC abutment. Haltech Technical Report
Japan.
Eng. J. 2007; 49(4): 64–69. 2006; 3: 24–29.
References [5] Tenma S, Iwasaki N, Niihira N, Tsuda Y, Morita [9] Ashizuka K, Miyata H, Sakate M, Kiso S,
T, Kurita A. A proposal of new connecting detail Kurita A. Design of hybrid frame bridge having
[1] Federal Highway Administration. Integral and the design method between steel composite spread foundation and proposal for rationaliza-
Abutment and Jointless Bridges 2005. girder and RC abutment in portal rigid-frame tion of connection detail between steel girder
Presentations and Proceedings, Baltimore, bridges. Bridge & Found. Eng. 2009; 43(10): and RC abutment. J. Struct. Eng. (JSCE) 2007;
Maryland, 2005. 25–30. 53A(3): 936–945.
[2] Collin P, Veljkovic M, Petursson H. [10] Public Works Research Center: Draft guide-
[6] Okubo N, Murata Y, Hiroe S. Design and con-
International Workshop on the Bridges with line for planning of integral abutment bridge
struction of Ofukishi River Bridge. Katayama
Integral Abutment. Technical Report 2006:16, (Edition for steel girder), 2004.
Technical Report 1996; 16: 41–48.
Lulea University of Technology, 2006.
[11] Iwasaki N, Tenma S, Niihira N, Tsuda Y,
[3] Zordan T, Briseghella B. Attainment of an [7] Konami T, Hiruta K, Anbo R, Chiba Y. Kurita A. Survey and study for approach slab in
integral abutment bridges through the refur- Design and field test of steel girder bridge com- integral abutment bridges: constructed examples
bishment of a simply supported structure. Struct. bined with abutment. Bridge Found. Eng. 2008; and FE analysis for pavement. Bridge & Found.
Eng. Int. IABSE 2007; 17(3): 228–234. 42(3): 14–20. Eng. 2008; 42(7): 34–39.

SED 12 - Recent Structural Engineering Document Published IABSE

This SED book provides case studies of structural rehabilitation, repair,


retrofitting, strengthening, and upgrading of structures. Selected stud-
ies are presented in this SED and cover a variety of structural types from
different countries.

This document is a summary of practices to help structural engineers.


The reader will discover different approaches to put forward strength-
ening or rehabilitation projects. Even identical technical problems
could have very different efficient solutions, as discussed in the papers,
considering structural, environmental, economic factors, as well as
contractor and designer experience, materials, etc.

Price:
CHF 40 for Members, CHF 70 for Non-Members

www.iabse.org/publications/onlineshop

296 Scientific Paper Structural Engineering International 3/2011

x058.indd 408 25/10/10 7:43 PM

You might also like