CAF Spring Your Say Survey 2017

1DWLRQDO'HIHQFH 'pIHQVHQDWLRQDOH

1DWLRQDO'HIHQFH+HDGTXDUWHUV 4XDUWLHUJpQpUDOGHOD'pIHQVHQDWLRQDOH
2WWDZD2QWDULR 2WWDZD2QWDULR
.$. .$.

1RYHPEHU
'5'&5''&/
'LVWULEXWLRQOLVW
7HUPVRI5HOHDVH7KLV6FLHQWLILF/HWWHULVDGRFXPHQWRI'HIHQFH5HVHDUFKDQG'HYHORSPHQW&DQDGDDQGLVIRULQWHUQDOXVHDQG
OLPLWHGH[WHUQDOXVHLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWKWKHRULJLQDOGLVWULEXWLRQOLVW)XUWKHUGLVWULEXWLRQRIWKLVGRFXPHQWRULQIRUPDWLRQFRQWDLQHG
KHUHLQLVSURKLELWHGZLWKRXWWKHZULWWHQDSSURYDORIWKHFOLHQWIRUZKRPLWZDVZULWWHQ
6FLHQWLILF/HWWHU
&DQDGLDQEHQFKPDUNLQJWRSOLQHUHVXOWVIURPWKH6SULQJ
<RXU6D\6XUYH\
%DFNJURXQG
7KLVUHSRUWSURYLGHVWKHWRSOLQHSHUFHQWDJHVRIWKHDWWLWXGLQDOEHQFKPDUNLQJLWHPVIURPWKH
6SULQJ<RXU6D\6XUYH\<66WRWKH8QLWHG.LQJGRP8.+8077&373QDWLRQDO
OHDGHUIRULQFOXVLRQLQWKHILUVWDQQXDO7HFKQLFDO&RRSHUDWLRQ3URJUDP77&3UHSRUWRQ
&RPPRQ$WWLWXGLQDO,WHPV7KLVUHSRUWLVIRUPDWWHGEDVHGRQWKHGLUHFWLRQSURYLGHGE\WKH8.
SRLQWRIFRQWDFW
6XUYH\,QVWUXPHQW2YHUYLHZ
7KH<66LVDQHOHFWURQLFVXUYH\DGPLQLVWHUHGWZLFHD\HDUVSULQJDQGIDOOIRUDSSUR[LPDWHO\
WZRPRQWKV7KH6SULQJ<66ZDVOLYHIURP$SULOWR-XQH7KH<66LV
DGPLQLVWHUHGE\'LUHFWRU*HQHUDO0LOLWDU\3HUVRQQHO5HVHDUFKDQG$QDO\VLV'*035$D
GLYLVLRQZLWKLQ0LOLWDU\3HUVRQQHO&RPPDQGDQGDSDUWQHUWR$VVLVWDQW'HSXW\0LQLVWHU6FLHQFH
DQG7HFKQRORJ\$'06 7ZLWKLQWKH&DQDGLDQ'HSDUWPHQWRI1DWLRQDO'HIHQFH'1'DQG
WKH&DQDGLDQ$UPHG)RUFHV&$)
7DUJHW3RSXODWLRQ
7KLVZDVWKHILUVWVSULQJ<66LQZKLFKTXHVWLRQVZHUHDVNHGRIERWK5HJXODU)RUFH5HJ)DQG
3ULPDU\5HVHUYH35HVPHPEHUVLQWKH&$)$OO5HJ)DQG35HVPHPEHUVLQVHUYLFHRQ
0DUFKZHUHLQFOXGHGLQWKHWDUJHWSRSXODWLRQZLWKWKHH[FHSWLRQRI
x 2IILFHUFDGHWVDQGSULYDWHUHFUXLWV
x 35HVPHPEHUVZKRKDGQRWUHFHLYHGDSD\FKHTXHLQWKHSDVWPRQWKV
x 0HPEHUVZLWKOHVVWKDQRQH\HDURIVHUYLFH

7KHGHVLJQRIWKLVUHSRUWZDVEDVHGRQ3HDFKDQG6TXLUHV(&DUGRQD33HDFK-$VVXFK
ZKLOHWKLVUHSRUWFRQWDLQVVXUYH\UHVXOWVDQGDQDO\VLVEDVHGRQWKH6SULQJ<66GDWDWH[WDQGVWUXFWXUHFRPPRQ
WRSUHYLRXV<66UHSRUWVLVXVHGWKURXJKRXW

 Members who were not on effective strength, were on retirement leave, or were absent
without authority; and
 Members who were deployed.
Excluding the above criteria, the target population was approximately 54,000 Reg F members
and 22,000 P Res members out of an overall population of approximately 68,000 Reg F and
27,000 P Res members.
Sampling Procedure
A stratified random sample (stratified by rank group and by Level One (L1) organization) was
used to contact Reg F and P Res members for the YSS. The sample was selected based on 20
strata, defined by four rank groups and five National Defence Headquarters L1 advisors (i.e.,
organizations).
The following list outlines the rank group categories that were used to select the sample for the
YSS. The first rank is the Army and Air Force rank and the second rank is the corresponding
Naval rank.
1. Junior (Jr) Non-Commissioned Members (NCMs): Privates (Aviators)/Ordinary
Seamen/Able Seamen, Corporals/Leading Seamen, and Master Corporals/Master
Seamen;
2. Senior (Sr) NCMs: Sergeants/Petty Officers 2nd Class, Warrant Officers/Petty Officers
1st Class, Master Warrant Officers/Chief Petty Officers 2nd Class, and Chief Warrant
Officers/Chief Petty Officers 1st Class;
3. Jr Officers: Second Lieutenants/Acting Sub-Lieutenants, Lieutenants/Sub-Lieutenants,
and Captains/Lieutenants (N); and
4. Sr Officers: Majors/Lieutenant-Commanders, Lieutenant-Colonels/Commanders,
Colonels/Captains (N), and General Officers/Flag Officers.
The organization (i.e., the National Defence Headquarters L1 advisor) was defined as a senior
official, either civilian or military, who has direct accountability to the Deputy Minister or the
Chief of Defence Staff. The five L1s identified in the YSS were:
1. Canadian Army;
2. Royal Canadian Navy;
3. Royal Canadian Airforce;
4. Chief of Military Personnel; and
5. Other.2
2 The “Other” L1 category included the Vice Chief of Defence Staff (VCDS), Canadian Joint Operations Command
(CJOC), Canadian Special Operations Forces Command (CANSOFCOM), Canadian Forces Intelligence Command
(CFINTCOM), ADM (Human Resources – Civilian), ADM (Information Management), ADM (Finance and Corporate
Services), ADM (Infrastructure and Environment), ADM (Material), ADM (Policy), ADM (Public Affairs), ADM Science
& Technology, the Judge Advocate General (JAG), and those individuals with missing L1 data in the database used
to select the sample. For the purpose of the analyses presented in Annex A, Chief of Military Personnel was also
included in the “Other” L1 category.
2
The original survey sample consisted of 10,393 CAF personnel (5,823 Reg F and 4,570 P Res
members), of which 10,011 (5,562 Reg F and 4,449 P Res) were available to be contacted. Of
the 10,011 invited members, 3,558 (2,232 Reg F and 1,322 P Res, 4 members did not indicate
their employment status) provided usable data for an overall response rate of 35.5% (40.1% for
Reg F and 29.7% for P Res). A total of 168 respondents did not complete at least one of the
scales and were therefore deleted from the sample, resulting in a final sample size of 3,390.
Weighting Data
Efforts were made to reduce the bias of estimates from coverage errors and non-responses.
Personnel with no work email addresses in the population data were included in the sample,
and efforts were made to find their email addresses using the Forces Global Address List. We
included them to cover more of the target population in our sample, but expected that we would
be unable to reach most personnel with no email address listed in our database.
In order to reduce non-response bias, the weights of survey results were adjusted by taking into
account the response rates of each of the sampling strata (defined by rank and L1). Despite the
adjustment of survey weights, the low response rate for the Spring 2017 YSS remains a
potential source of bias. That is, bias could result from the differences between the attitudes and
opinions of respondents and those of non-respondents.
In this report, best practices established for the YSS were followed, including reporting weighted
results. However, because the information in this letter report will be compared to that from
nations that may not weight attitudinal survey data, unweighted frequencies and percentages,
as requested by the HUM TTCP TP23 UK representative, are also included in Annex A.
Internal and External Environment during the Survey

The Government of Canada’s Defence Minister announced the new defence policy, Strong,
Secure, and Engaged, while the survey was live, on June 7, 2017. In the release of the new
policy, a number of new initiatives were announced including larger budgets for defence
spending, a salary tax exemption for troops deployed on international operations, an increase in
recruitment of women in the military, and a transformation strategy for the transition of CAF
members (National Defence, 2017). During the timeframe of the YSS, CAF members were
involved in a number of responsive operations. Operation LENTUS, the CAF response to
natural disasters, responded to significant flooding conditions. During early May, 2,600 CAF
members responded to flooding in Quebec, while CAF members also evacuated 33 people from
Mud Lake, Newfoundland on May 17, 2017 (National Defence and the Canadian Armed Forces,
2017; Tang, 2017). Approximately 800 Canadian troops remained involved in Operation
IMPACT, a global coalition against Daesh in Iraq and Syria, and approximately one month
before the YSS was administered, the Government of Canada revealed that this operation
would be extended (CBC News, 2017; Fisher, 2017). Shortly before the YSS was administered
Operation UNIFIER, a mission to support Ukrainian armed forces, received an extension
involving 200 CAF members (Brewster, 2017). In May 2017, it was also announced that
Operation ARTEMIS, a mission to improve the security of Middle Eastern waters, would receive
a four year extension and deployment of up to 375 CAF members (Pugliese, 2017).
3
Statement of the TTCP Benchmarking Items
The overall frequencies, unweighted percent (including only the responses to each question),
and weighted percent for each of the 14 TTCP benchmarking items can be found in Annex A
below. Overall results are presented, as well as results by rank (Officer vs. NCM), sex, and by
L1 organization. They are included in this report so they can be combined with the results of the
other TTCP nations in analyses that will be reported to HUM TTCP TP23 in April 2018. Table
one contains the 14 items that are presented in Annex A.
Table 1. TTCP Benchmarking Items.
TTCP Benchmarking Items
1. Satisfaction with the military way of life.
2. Satisfaction with the way your career is being managed.
3. Satisfaction with your opportunities for promotion.
4. I am able to maintain a balance between my personal and working life.
5. My family supports my career in the CAF.
6. I am satisfied with the leadership provided by my immediate supervisor.
7. I trust my immediate supervisor.
8. I have confidence in the leadership of the CAF.
9. I am actively looking at leaving the CAF.
10. The pay and benefits are fair for the work I do.
11. Overall, I am satisfied with my job.
12. How would you rate the current level of morale in your unit/workplace?
13. How would you rate your current individual level of morale?
14. I am proud to be in the CAF.
Prepared By: Carina Daugherty, MA, DROOD 4-7 (Director Research Operational and
Organizational Dynamics), Director General Military Personnel Research and Analysis.
Reviewed By: Gary Ivey, CD, MSc, Director Research Operational and Organizational
Dynamics, Director General Military Personnel Research and Analysis.
Director General: Kelly M.J. Farley, CD, PhD, Director General Military Personnel Research
and Analysis.
Date Prepared: 15 November, 2017
4
References
Brewster, M. (2017, March). Canada extending military mission in Ukraine to 2019. CBC News.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-ukraine-military-mission-1.4011870
CBC News. (2017, March). Canada extends mission against ISIS in northern Iraq to June 30.
CBC News. http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/sajjan-isis-daesh-extension-1.4049418
Fisher, M. (2017, February). Canadian Forces studying options for potential Syrian operation.
National Post. http://nationalpost.com/opinion/matthew-fisher-canadian-forces-studying-
options-for-potential-syrian-operation
National Defence. (2017). Strong Secure Engaged: Canada’s Defence Policy (Highlights).
http://dgpaapp.forces.gc.ca/en/canada-defence-policy/docs/summary.pdf
National Defence and the Canadian Armed Forces. (2017). Operation LENTUS.
http://www.forces.gc.ca/en/operations-canada-north-america/op-lentus.page
Peach, J. (2015). Spring 2015 Your-Say Survey: Canadian Benchmarking Top Line Results.
(Director General Military Personnel Research and Analysis Scientific Letter DRDC-RDDC-
2015-L393). Ottawa, ON: Defence Research and Development Canada.
Pugliese, D. (2017, May). Operation Artemis extended until 2021. Ottawa Citizen.
http://ottawacitizen.com/news/national/defence-watch/operation-artemis-extended-until-2021
Squires, E., Cardona, P., Peach, J. (2016). Canadian benchmarking top line results from the
Spring 2016 Your Say Survey: Report to TTCP. (Director General Military Personnel Research
and Analysis Scientific Letter DRDC-RDDC-2016-L398). Ottawa, ON: Defence Research and
Development Canada.
Tang, J. (2017, May 6). What you need to know about the flooding in Quebec and across
Canada. The Globe and Mail. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/in-quebec-and-
across-canada-residents-face-rain-rising-rivers-andflooding/article34913687/
5
Attachments
Annex A: 2017 YSS TTCP Benchmarking Results
This Scientific Letter is a publication of Defence Research and Development Canada. The reported results, their interpretation, and
any opinions expressed therein, remain those of the authors and do not necessarily represent, or otherwise reflect, any official
opinion or position of the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF), Department of National Defence (DND), or the Government of Canada.
In conducting the research described in this report, the investigators adhered to the policies and procedures set out in the Tri-
Council Policy Statement: Ethical conduct for research involving humans, National Council on Ethics in Human Research, Ottawa,
2014 as issued jointly by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of
Canada and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of National Defence, 2017
© Sa Majesté la Reine (en droit du Canada), telle que représentée par le ministre de la Défense nationale, 2017
Distribution List
Action
UK HUM TTCP TP23 National Leader
Info
Australia HUM TTCP TP23 National Leader
New Zealand HUM TTCP TP23 National Leader
Canada HUM TTCP TP23 National Leader
6
Annex A 2017 YSS TTCP Benchmarking Results
Annex A presents the overall TTCP Benchmarking results, as well as the results by Rank
(Officer vs. NCM), by sex, and by Service (Navy, Army, Air Force, and Other).
Table 2. Frequencies and Percentages (All Respondents) on satisfaction with “the military way
of life.”
Response Category Dissatisfied Neutral Satisfied Total
Unweighted Frequency
Reg F 376 220 1633 2229
P Res 118 99 1102 1319
Unweighted valid percent
Reg F 16.9% 9.9% 73.3% 100%
P Res 8.9% 7.5% 83.5% 100%
Weighted valid percent
Reg F 18.6% 11.1% 70.3% 100%
P Res 9.8% 9.3% 80.9% 100%
Table 3. Frequencies and Percentages (Officers vs. NCM) on satisfaction with "the military way
of life.”
Unweighted Frequency NCM

Reg F 218 132 854 1204
P Res 71 61 585 717
Unweighted Frequency Officer
Reg F 158 88 779 1025
P Res 47 38 517 602
Unweighted valid percent NCM
Reg F 18.1% 11.0% 70.9% 100%
P Res 9.9% 8.5% 81.6% 100%
Unweighted valid percent Officer
Reg F 15.4% 8.6% 76.0% 100%
7
P Res 7.8% 6.3% 85.9% 100%
Weighted valid percent NCM
Reg F 19.5% 11.7% 68.7% 100%
P Res 10.3% 9.9% 79.8% 100%
Weighted valid percent Officer
Reg F 15.0% 8.7% 76.3% 100%
P Res 7.5% 6.8% 85.7% 100%
Table 4. Frequencies and Percentages (Men vs. Women) on satisfaction with "the military way
of life.”
Unweighted Frequency Men
Reg F 317 189 1353 1859
P Res 93 82 891 1066
Unweighted Frequency Women
Reg F 55 31 273 359
P Res 22 17 203 242
Unweighted valid percent Men
Reg F 17.1% 10.2% 72.8% 100%
P Res 8.7% 7.7% 83.6% 100%
Unweighted valid percent Women
Reg F 15.3% 8.6% 76.0% 100%
P Res 9.1% 7.0% 83.9% 100%
Weighted valid percent Men
Reg F 19.4% 11.0% 69.6% 100%
P Res 9.8% 9.7% 80.5% 100%
Weighted valid percent Women
8
Reg F 13.1% 11.9% 75.0% 100%
P Res 9.7% 8.2% 82.1% 100%
Table 5. Frequencies and Percentages (Navy, Army, Air Force, and other L1 organization) on
satisfaction with “the military way of life.”
Unweighted Frequency Navy
Reg F 67 37 249 353
P Res 14 12 137 163
Unweighted Frequency Army
Reg F 109 67 469 645
P Res 53 56 577 686
Unweighted Frequency Air Force
Reg F 95 50 372 517
P Res 33 17 226 276
Unweighted Frequency Other
Reg F 105 66 543 714
P Res 18 14 162 194
Unweighted valid percent Navy
Reg F 19.0% 10.5% 70.5% 100%
P Res 8.6% 7.4% 84.0% 100%
Unweighted valid percent Army
Reg F 16.9% 10.4% 72.7% 100%
P Res 7.7% 8.2% 84.1% 100%
Unweighted valid percent Air Force
Reg F 18.4% 9.7% 72.0% 100%
P Res 12.0% 6.2% 81.9% 100%
Unweighted valid percent Other
9
Reg F 14.7% 9.2% 76.1% 100%
P Res 9.3% 7.2% 83.5% 100%
Weighted valid percent Navy
Reg F 22.7% 12.1% 65.2% 100%
P Res 8.7%* 10.8%* 80.5% 100%
Weighted valid percent Army
Reg F 19.8% 12.3% 67.9% 100%
P Res 9.8% 9.6% 80.5% 100%
Weighted valid percent Air Force
Reg F 19.0% 9.8% 71.2% 100%
P Res 11.5% 7.4% 81.1% 100%
Weighted valid percent Other
Reg F 14.8% 10.1% 75.0% 100%
P Res 9.0%* 7.5%* 83.6% 100%

* Coefficient of variation is greater than 0.333. Interpret with caution.
Table 6. Frequencies and Percentages (All Respondents) on satisfaction with “the way your
career is being managed.”
Reg F 824 315 1086 2225
P Res 357 252 704 1313
Reg F 37.0% 14.2% 48.8% 100%
P Res 27.2% 19.2% 53.6% 100%
Reg F 38.6% 14.9% 46.5% 100%
P Res 28.5% 17.0% 54.6% 100%
10
Table 7. Frequencies and Percentages (Officers vs. NCM) on satisfaction with "the way your
Reg F 447 184 572 1203
P Res 197 135 381 713
Reg F 377 131 514 1022
P Res 160 117 323 600
Reg F 37.2% 15.3% 47.5% 100%
P Res 27.6% 18.9% 53.4% 100%
Reg F 36.9% 12.8% 50.3% 100%
P Res 26.7% 19.5% 53.8% 100%
Reg F 39.1% 15.6% 45.4% 100%
P Res 28.8% 16.7% 54.5% 100%
Reg F 36.8% 12.5% 50.7% 100%
P Res 26.9% 18.3% 54.8% 100%
Table 8. Frequencies and Percentages (Men vs. Women) on satisfaction with "the way your
Reg F 694 269 893 1856
P Res 291 216 555 1062
11
Reg F 126 46 186 358
P Res 62 35 144 241
Reg F 37.4% 14.5% 48.1% 100%
P Res 27.4% 20.3% 52.3% 100%
Reg F 35.2% 12.8% 52.0% 100%
P Res 25.7% 14.5% 59.8% 100%
Reg F 39.3% 14.8% 45.8% 100%
P Res 29.5% 18.2% 52.3% 100%
Reg F 34.2% 15.8% 49.9% 100%
P Res 24.0% 12.9% 63.2% 100%
Table 9. Frequencies and Percentages (Navy, Army, Air Force, and other Level 1 organizations)
on satisfaction with “the way your career is being managed.”
Reg F 120 52 182 354
P Res 44 22 96 162
Reg F 257 90 295 642
P Res 185 118 381 684
Reg F 187 80 249 516
P Res 60 75 138 273
12
Reg F 260 93 360 713
P Res 68 37 89 194
Reg F 33.9% 14.7% 51.4% 100%
P Res 27.2% 13.6% 59.3% 100%
Reg F 40.0% 14.0% 46.0% 100%
P Res 27.0% 17.3% 55.7% 100%
Reg F 36.2% 15.5% 48.3% 100%
P Res 22.0% 27.5% 50.5% 100%
Reg F 36.5% 13.0% 50.5% 100%
P Res 35.1% 19.1% 45.9% 100%
Reg F 37.2% 14.0% 48.8% 100%
P Res 27.2% 12.7% 60.1% 100%
Reg F 42.0% 15.5% 42.5% 100%
P Res 28.0% 16.5% 55.5% 100%
Reg F 36.7% 15.9% 47.4% 100%
P Res 25.6% 26.2% 48.2% 100%
Reg F 36.4% 13.9% 49.7% 100%
P Res 35.1% 16.6% 48.3% 100%
13
Table 10. Frequencies and Percentages (All Respondents) on satisfaction with, “your
opportunities for promotion.”
Reg F 559 326 1342 2227
P Res 306 228 783 1317
Reg F 25.1% 14.6% 60.3% 100%
P Res 23.2% 17.3% 59.5% 100%
Reg F 24.9% 15.5% 59.6% 100%
P Res 23.5% 18.1% 58.4% 100%
Table 11. Frequencies and Percentages (Officers vs. NCM) on satisfaction with "your
opportunities for promotion."
Reg F 272 189 743 1204
P Res 173 134 409 716
Reg F 287 137 599 1023
P Res 133 94 374 601
Reg F 22.6% 15.7% 61.7% 100%
P Res 24.2% 18.7% 57.1% 100%
Reg F 28.1% 13.4% 58.6% 100%
P Res 22.1% 15.6% 62.2% 100%
14
Reg F 24.2% 16.1% 59.7% 100%
P Res 23.7% 18.9% 57.3% 100%
Reg F 27.9% 13.1% 59.0% 100%
P Res 22.1% 14.5% 63.4% 100%
Table 12. Frequencies and Percentages (Men vs. Women) on satisfaction with "your
opportunities for promotion."
Reg F 471 274 1111 1856
P Res 244 187 633 1064
Reg F 85 51 224 360
P Res 58 37 147 242
Reg F 25.4% 14.8% 59.9% 100%
P Res 22.9% 17.6% 59.5% 100%
Reg F 23.6% 14.2% 62.2% 100%
P Res 24.0% 15.3% 60.7% 100%
Reg F 25.3% 15.5% 59.2% 100%
P Res 23.7% 19.0% 57.3% 100%
Reg F 22.8% 15.8% 61.3% 100%
P Res 21.8% 14.0% 64.2% 100%
15
satisfaction with “your opportunities for promotion.”
Reg F 96 43 215 354
P Res 45 25 93 163
Reg F 161 91 391 643
P Res 145 108 433 686
Reg F 127 90 298 515
P Res 51 68 156 275
Reg F 175 102 438 715
P Res 65 27 101 193
Reg F 27.1% 12.1% 60.7% 100%
P Res 27.6% 15.3% 57.1% 100%
Reg F 25.0% 14.2% 60.8% 100%
P Res 21.1% 15.7% 63.1% 100%
Reg F 24.7% 17.5% 57.9% 100%
P Res 18.5% 24.7% 56.7% 100%
Reg F 24.5% 14.3% 61.3% 100%
P Res 33.7% 14.0% 52.3% 100%
16
Reg F 28.9% 13.5% 57.6% 100%
P Res 27.5% 21.6% 50.9% 100%
Reg F 24.5% 15.5% 60.1% 100%
P Res 22.3% 17.0% 60.7% 100%
Reg F 26.2% 17.1% 56.7% 100%
P Res 20.1% 26.5% 53.4% 100%
Reg F 22.7% 15.2% 62.1% 100%
P Res 29.9% 15.2% 54.9% 100%
Table 14. Frequencies and Percentages (All Respondents) on the item "I am able to maintain a
balance between my personal and working life."
Response Category Disagree Neutral Agree Total
Reg F 433 266 1450 2149
P Res 182 126 963 1271
Reg F 20.1% 12.4% 67.5% 100%
P Res 14.3% 9.9% 75.8% 100%
Reg F 19.0% 13.3% 67.7% 100%
P Res 16.2% 10.7% 73.1% 100%
Table 15. Frequencies and Percentages (Officers vs. NCM) on the item "I am able to maintain a
17
Reg F 202 153 799 1154
P Res 98 76 512 686
Reg F 231 113 651 995
P Res 84 50 451 585
Reg F 17.5% 13.3% 69.2% 100%
P Res 14.3% 11.1% 74.6% 100%
Reg F 23.2% 11.4% 65.4% 100%
P Res 14.4% 8.5% 77.1% 100%
Reg F 17.8% 14.1% 68.1% 100%
P Res 16.5% 11.0% 72.4% 100%
Reg F 23.3% 10.5% 66.2% 100%
P Res 14.7% 9.1% 76.2% 100%
Table 16. Frequencies and Percentages (Men vs. Women) on the item "I am able to maintain a
Reg F 362 227 1202 1791
P Res 154 107 768 1029
Reg F 69 39 240 348
P Res 26 19 186 231
18
Reg F 20.2% 12.7% 67.1% 100%
P Res 15.0% 10.4% 74.6% 100%
Reg F 19.8% 11.2% 69.0% 100%
P Res 11.3% 8.2% 80.5% 100%
Reg F 18.9% 13.5% 67.5% 100%
P Res 18.2% 11.5% 70.3% 100%
Reg F 18.8% 12.5% 68.7% 100%
P Res 8.6% 8.2% 83.2% 100%
the item “I am able to maintain a balance between my personal and working life.”
Reg F 74 42 223 339
P Res 14 16 127 157
Reg F 134 97 393 624
P Res 123 70 474 667
Reg F 94 51 355 500
P Res 29 24 211 264
Reg F 131 76 479 686
P Res 16 16 151 183
19
Reg F 21.8% 12.4% 65.8% 100%
P Res 8.9% 10.2% 80.9% 100%
Reg F 21.5% 15.5% 63.0% 100%
P Res 18.4% 10.5% 71.1% 100%

Unweighted valid percent Air
Force
Reg F 18.8% 10.2% 71.0% 100%
P Res 11.0% 9.1% 79.9% 100%
Reg F 19.1% 11.1% 69.8% 100%
P Res 8.7% 8.7% 82.5% 100%
Reg F 21.2% 13.7% 65.1% 100%
P Res 5.7%* 12.7% 81.5% 100%
Reg F 20.6% 16.6% 62.8% 100%
P Res 20.1% 10.8% 69.1% 100%
Reg F 16.0% 9.6% 74.4% 100%
P Res 9.7% 11.2% 79.2% 100%
Reg F 18.1% 11.9% 70.1% 100%
P Res 5.1% 7.2%* 87.7% 100%

20
Table 18. Frequencies and Percentages (All Respondents) on the item "my family supports my
career in the CAF."
Reg F 151 180 1744 2075
P Res 66 101 1074 1241
Reg F 7.3% 8.7% 84.0% 100%
P Res 5.3% 8.1% 86.5% 100%
Reg F 8.0% 9.5% 82.4% 100%
P Res 5.9% 8.2% 85.9% 100%
Table 19. Frequencies and Percentages (Officers vs. NCM) on the item "my family supports my
career in the CAF."
Reg F 82 103 930 1115
P Res 35 60 577 672
Reg F 69 77 814 960
P Res 31 41 497 569
Reg F 7.4% 9.2% 83.4% 100%
P Res 5.2% 8.9% 85.9% 100%
Reg F 7.2% 8.0% 84.8% 100%
P Res 5.4% 7.2% 87.3% 100%
21
Reg F 8.2% 9.9% 81.9% 100%
P Res 5.9% 8.4% 85.7% 100%
Reg F 7.3% 8.1% 84.6% 100%
P Res 5.7% 7.5% 86.8% 100%
Table 20. Frequencies and Percentages (Men vs. Women) on the item "my family supports my
career in the CAF."
Reg F 133 150 1454 1737
P Res 59 83 864 1006
Reg F 18 29 283 330
P Res 7 15 202 224
Reg F 7.7% 8.6% 83.7% 100%
P Res 5.9% 8.3% 85.9% 100%

Women
Reg F 5.5% 8.8% 85.8% 100%
P Res 3.1% 6.7% 90.2% 100%
Reg F 8.3% 9.3% 82.4% 100%
P Res 6.6% 9.0% 84.4% 100%
Reg F 6.6% 10.4% 83.0% 100%
P Res 3.4%* 4.6% 92.0% 100%

22
the item “my family supports my career in the CAF.”
Reg F 18 31 280 329
P Res 6 16 129 151
Reg F 52 57 489 598
P Res 37 49 568 654
Reg F 35 34 411 480
P Res 14 23 221 258
Reg F 46 58 564 668
P Res 9 13 156 178
Reg F 5.5% 9.4% 85.1% 100%
P Res 4.0% 10.6% 85.4% 100%
Reg F 8.7% 9.5% 81.8% 100%
P Res 5.7% 7.5% 86.9% 100%

Force
Reg F 7.3% 7.1% 85.6% 100%
P Res 5.4% 8.9% 85.7% 100%
Reg F 6.9% 8.7% 84.4% 100%
P Res 5.1% 7.3% 87.6% 100%
23
Reg F 5.6% 10.8% 83.6% 100%
P Res 2.1%* 13.1% 84.8% 100%
Reg F 10.3% 11.5% 78.2% 100%
P Res 6.4% 7.7% 85.9% 100%
Reg F 6.6% 6.6% 86.8% 100%
P Res 7.2% 11.0% 81.8% 100%
Reg F 7.5% 8.5% 84.0% 100%
P Res 5.0%* 4.7% 90.4% 100%

Table 22. Frequencies and Percentages (All Respondents) on the item "I am satisfied with the
leadership provided by my immediate supervisor."
Reg F 411 143 1580 2134
P Res 197 75 994 1266
Reg F 19.3% 6.7% 74.0% 100%
P Res 15.6% 5.9% 78.5% 100%
Reg F 20.1% 7.0% 72.9% 100%
P Res 16.1% 6.0% 77.9% 100%
24
Table 23. Frequencies and Percentages (Officers vs. NCM) on the item "I am satisfied with the
Reg F 235 76 830 1141
P Res 114 43 533 690
Reg F 176 67 750 993
P Res 83 32 461 576
Reg F 20.6% 6.7% 72.7% 100%
P Res 16.5% 6.2% 77.2% 100%
Reg F 17.7% 6.7% 75.5% 100%
P Res 14.4% 5.6% 80.0% 100%
Reg F 21.1% 7.1% 71.9% 100%
P Res 16.3% 6.1% 77.6% 100%
Reg F 16.6% 6.7% 76.8% 100%
P Res 15.0% 5.8% 79.2% 100%
Table 24. Frequencies and Percentages (Men vs. Women) on the item "I am satisfied with the
Reg F 327 118 1340 1785
P Res 158 63 805 1026
25
Reg F 81 25 233 339
P Res 37 12 180 229
Reg F 18.3% 6.6% 75.1% 100%
P Res 15.4% 6.1% 78.5% 100%

Women
Reg F 23.9% 7.4% 68.7% 100%
P Res 16.2% 5.2% 78.6% 100%
Reg F 19.1% 6.7% 74.2% 100%
P Res 16.4% 6.6% 77.0% 100%
Reg F 25.7% 8.8% 65.5% 100%
P Res 15.1% 4.1%* 80.8% 100%

the item “I am satisfied with the leadership provided by my immediate supervisor.”
Reg F 57 20 258 335
P Res 23 8 126 157
Reg F 126 42 450 618
P Res 112 36 515 663
Reg F 101 35 364 500
P Res 31 22 210 263
26
Reg F 127 46 508 681
P Res 31 9 143 183
Reg F 17.0% 6.0% 77.0% 100%
P Res 14.6% 5.1% 80.3% 100%
Reg F 20.4% 6.8% 72.8% 100%
P Res 16.9% 5.4% 77.7% 100%

Force
Reg F 20.2% 7.0% 72.8% 100%
P Res 11.8% 8.4% 79.8% 100%
Reg F 18.6% 6.8% 74.6% 100%
P Res 16.9% 4.9% 78.1% 100%
Reg F 18.2% 5.8% 76.0% 100%
P Res 16.3% 6.7%* 77.1% 100%
Reg F 20.7% 7.0% 72.3% 100%
P Res 16.7% 5.5% 77.8% 100%
Reg F 21.9% 7.4% 70.7% 100%
P Res 11.3% 11.3% 77.4% 100%
Reg F 18.9% 7.2% 73.9% 100%
27
P Res 15.9% 4.5%* 79.5% 100%

Table 26. Frequencies and Percentages (All Respondents) on the item "I trust my immediate
supervisor."
Reg F 360 138 1632 2130
P Res 147 78 1040 1265
Reg F 16.9% 6.5% 76.6% 100%
P Res 11.6% 6.2% 82.2% 100%
Reg F 18.2% 6.8% 74.9% 100%
P Res 12.4% 5.8% 81.8% 100%
Table 27. Frequencies and Percentages (Officers vs. NCM) on the item "I trust my immediate
supervisor."
Reg F 211 81 847 1139
P Res 88 44 557 689
Reg F 149 57 785 991
P Res 59 34 483 576
Reg F 18.5% 7.1% 74.4% 100%
P Res 12.8% 6.4% 80.8% 100%
28
Reg F 15.0% 5.8% 79.2% 100%
P Res 10.2% 5.9% 83.9% 100%
Reg F 19.3% 7.2% 73.5% 100%
P Res 12.8% 5.7% 81.5% 100%
Reg F 14.2% 5.6% 80.2% 100%
P Res 10.7% 6.0% 83.3% 100%
Table 28. Frequencies and Percentages (Men vs. Women) on the item "I trust my immediate
supervisor."
Reg F 283 120 1378 1781
P Res 117 66 841 1024
Reg F 76 17 246 339
P Res 28 11 191 230
Reg F 15.9% 6.7% 77.4% 100%
P Res 11.4% 6.4% 82.1% 100%

Women
Reg F 22.4% 5.0% 72.6% 100%
P Res 12.2% 4.8% 83.0% 100%
Reg F 17.3% 7.0% 75.7% 100%
P Res 12.3% 6.4% 81.3% 100%
29
Reg F 24.2% 5.8% 70.0% 100%
P Res 13.0% 3.6%* 83.4% 100%

the item “I trust my immediate supervisor.”
Reg F 45 22 268 335
P Res 18 8 131 157
Reg F 118 41 459 618
P Res 81 36 545 662
Reg F 85 38 375 498
P Res 24 22 217 263
Reg F 112 37 530 679
P Res 24 12 147 183
Reg F 13.4% 6.6% 80.0% 100%
P Res 11.5% 5.1% 83.4% 100%
Reg F 19.1% 6.6% 74.3% 100%
P Res 12.2% 5.4% 82.3% 100%

Force
Reg F 17.1% 7.6% 75.3% 100%
P Res 9.1% 8.4% 82.5% 100%
30
Reg F 16.5% 5.4% 78.1% 100%
P Res 13.1% 6.6% 80.3% 100%
Reg F 14.6% 6.8% 78.6% 100%
P Res 11.5% 6.8%* 81.7% 100%
Reg F 19.6% 7.3% 73.1% 100%
P Res 12.7% 5.2% 82.2% 100%
Reg F 20.1% 7.1% 72.8% 100%
P Res 10.2% 10.1% 79.7% 100%
Reg F 16.8% 5.9% 77.2% 100%
P Res 13.7% 5.3%* 81.0% 100%

Table 30. Frequencies and Percentages (All Respondents) on the item "I have confidence in
the leadership of the CAF."
Reg F 633 606 872 2111
P Res 270 316 665 1251
Reg F 30.0% 28.7% 41.3% 100%
P Res 21.6% 25.3% 53.2% 100%
Reg F 32.2% 28.9% 38.9% 100%
P Res 22.8% 26.2% 51.0% 100%
31
Table 31. Frequencies and Percentages (Officers vs. NCM) on the item "I have confidence in
the leadership of the CAF."
Reg F 373 318 436 1127
P Res 162 192 324 678
Reg F 260 288 436 984
P Res 108 124 341 573
Reg F 33.1% 28.2% 38.7% 100%
P Res 23.9% 28.3% 47.8% 100%
Reg F 26.4% 29.3% 44.3% 100%
P Res 18.8% 21.6% 59.5% 100%
Reg F 34.0% 28.9% 37.1% 100%
P Res 23.7% 27.3% 49.0% 100%
Reg F 25.8% 28.9% 45.3% 100%
P Res 18.9% 21.2% 59.9% 100%
Table 32. Frequencies and Percentages (Men vs. Women) on the item "I have confidence in the
leadership of the CAF."
Reg F 534 504 727 1765
P Res 228 247 537 1012
Reg F 96 100 140 336
32
P Res 39 66 123 228
Reg F 30.3% 28.6% 41.2% 100%
P Res 22.5% 24.4% 53.1% 100%

Women
Reg F 28.6% 29.8% 41.7% 100%
P Res 17.1% 28.9% 53.9% 100%
Reg F 32.9% 28.9% 38.2% 100%
P Res 23.7% 25.5% 50.7% 100%
Reg F 28.6% 29.2% 42.2% 100%
P Res 19.6% 28.2% 52.2% 100%
the item “I have confidence in the leadership of the CAF.”
Reg F 122 88 124 334
P Res 29 40 88 157
Reg F 164 183 265 612
P Res 131 162 359 652
Reg F 169 156 165 490
P Res 75 71 113 259
Reg F 178 179 318 675
33
P Res 35 43 105 183
Reg F 36.5% 26.3% 37.1% 100%
P Res 18.5% 25.5% 56.1% 100%
Reg F 26.8% 29.9% 43.3% 100%
P Res 20.1% 24.8% 55.1% 100%

Force
Reg F 34.5% 31.8% 33.7% 100%
P Res 29.0% 27.4% 43.6% 100%
Reg F 26.4% 26.5% 47.1% 100%
P Res 19.1% 23.5% 57.4% 100%
Reg F 41.0% 23.7% 35.3% 100%
P Res 19.3% 25.5% 55.2% 100%
Reg F 29.8% 31.9% 38.3% 100%
P Res 22.7% 25.7% 51.6% 100%
Reg F 35.7% 31.6% 32.7% 100%
P Res 30.9% 30.1% 39.0% 100%
Reg F 28.5% 25.5% 46.0% 100%
P Res 20.5% 26.6% 52.9% 100%
34
Table 34. Frequencies and Percentages (All Respondents) on the item "I am actively looking at
leaving the CAF."
Reg F 1167 342 542 2051
P Res 759 206 227 1192
Reg F 56.9% 16.7% 26.4% 100%
P Res 63.7% 17.3% 19.0% 100%
Reg F 58.1% 16.7% 25.3% 100%
P Res 67.4% 16.1% 16.5% 100%
Table 35. Frequencies and Percentages (Officers vs. NCM) on the item "I am actively looking at
leaving the CAF."
Reg F 617 193 275 1085
P Res 421 113 114 648
Reg F 550 149 267 966
P Res 338 93 113 544
Reg F 56.9% 17.8% 25.3% 100%
P Res 65.0% 17.4% 17.6% 100%
Reg F 56.9% 15.4% 27.6% 100%
P Res 62.1% 17.1% 20.8% 100%
35
Reg F 58.5% 17.1% 24.4% 100%
P Res 68.4% 16.0% 15.7% 100%
Reg F 56.6% 15.2% 28.2% 100%
P Res 63.0% 16.5% 20.5% 100%
Table 36. Frequencies and Percentages (Men vs. Women) on the item "I am actively looking at
leaving the CAF."
Reg F 956 285 476 1717
P Res 604 168 190 962
Reg F 204 57 63 324
P Res 151 35 34 220
Reg F 55.7% 16.6% 27.7% 100%
P Res 62.8% 17.5% 19.8% 100%
Reg F 63.0% 17.6% 19.4% 100%
P Res 68.6% 15.9% 15.5% 100%
Reg F 57.0% 16.7% 26.3% 100%
P Res 66.4% 16.2% 17.4% 100%
Reg F 63.9% 16.9% 19.2% 100%
P Res 72.3% 14.5% 13.2% 100%
36
the item “I am actively looking at leaving the CAF.”
Reg F 180 58 87 325
P Res 110 21 21 152
Reg F 345 102 144 591
P Res 410 108 113 631
Reg F 256 82 134 472
P Res 130 51 55 236
Reg F 386 100 177 663
P Res 109 26 38 173
Reg F 55.4% 17.8% 26.8% 100%
P Res 72.4% 13.8% 13.8% 100%
Reg F 58.4% 17.3% 24.4% 100%
P Res 65.0% 17.1% 17.9% 100%
Reg F 54.2% 17.4% 28.4% 100%
P Res 55.1% 21.6% 23.3% 100%
Reg F 58.2% 15.1% 26.7% 100%
P Res 63.0% 15.0% 22.0% 100%
Reg F 53.6% 19.7% 26.7% 100%
37
P Res 73.2% 13.9% 12.9% 100%
Reg F 59.5% 16.0% 24.4% 100%
P Res 68.1% 16.2% 15.6% 100%
Reg F 57.1% 17.8% 25.1% 100%
P Res 54.5% 21.9% 23.7% 100%
Reg F 59.1% 15.2% 25.7% 100%
P Res 66.8% 12.4% 20.8% 100%
Table 38. Frequencies and Percentages (All Respondents) on the item "the pay and benefits
are fair for the work I do."
Reg F 682 238 1307 2227
P Res 437 135 745 1317
Reg F 30.6% 10.7% 58.7% 100%
P Res 33.2% 10.3% 56.6% 100%
Reg F 33.0% 11.9% 55.1% 100%
P Res 30.0% 13.0% 57.0% 100%
Table 39. Frequencies and Percentages (Officers vs. NCM) on the item "the pay and benefits
are fair for the work I do."
Reg F 426 148 629 1203
38
P Res 251 89 375 715
Reg F 256 90 678 1024
P Res 186 46 370 602
Reg F 35.4% 12.3% 52.3% 100%
P Res 35.1% 12.4% 52.4% 100%
Reg F 25.0% 8.8% 66.2% 100%
P Res 30.9% 7.6% 61.5% 100%
Reg F 35.1% 12.7% 52.3% 100%
P Res 29.9% 14.1% 56.0% 100%
Reg F 25.2% 8.8% 66.0% 100%
P Res 30.3% 7.9% 61.8% 100%
Table 40. Frequencies and Percentages (Men vs. Women) on the item "the pay and benefits are
fair for the work I do."
Reg F 591 196 1072 1859
P Res 354 113 598 1065
Reg F 85 42 230 357
P Res 80 20 141 241
Reg F 31.8% 10.5% 57.7% 100%
39
P Res 33.2% 10.6% 56.2% 100%
Reg F 23.8% 11.8% 64.4% 100%
P Res 33.2% 8.3% 58.5% 100%
Reg F 34.2% 11.5% 54.3% 100%
P Res 29.2% 13.7% 57.1% 100%
Reg F 25.6% 14.3% 60.1% 100%
P Res 33.7% 10.5% 55.8% 100%
the item “the pay and benefits are fair for the work I do.”
Reg F 123 27 204 354
P Res 38 14 110 162
Reg F 171 87 387 645
P Res 227 77 383 687
Reg F 179 46 290 515
P Res 101 27 147 275
Reg F 209 78 426 713
P Res 71 17 105 193
Reg F 34.7% 7.6% 57.6% 100%
40
P Res 23.5% 8.6% 67.9% 100%
Reg F 26.5% 13.5% 60.0% 100%
P Res 33.0% 11.2% 55.7% 100%
Reg F 34.8% 8.9% 56.3% 100%
P Res 36.7% 9.8% 53.5% 100%
Reg F 29.3% 10.9% 59.7% 100%
P Res 36.8% 8.8% 54.4% 100%
Reg F 37.4% 7.7% 54.9% 100%
P Res 20.9% 9.8%* 69.2% 100%
Reg F 30.9% 14.7% 54.3% 100%
P Res 30.9% 13.7% 55.4% 100%
Reg F 36.0% 10.5% 53.5% 100%
P Res 37.7% 9.5% 52.8% 100%
Reg F 31.2% 11.3% 57.5% 100%
P Res 26.7% 14.0% 59.3% 100%

Table 42. Frequencies and Percentages (All Respondents) on the item "overall, I am satisfied
with my job."
Reg F 410 381 1397 2188
41
P Res 133 176 993 1302
Reg F 18.7% 17.4% 63.8% 100%
P Res 10.2% 13.5% 76.3% 100%
Reg F 20.3% 17.6% 62.1% 100%
P Res 11.2% 14.5% 74.3% 100%
Table 43. Frequencies and Percentages (Officers vs. NCM) on the item "overall, I am satisfied
with my job."
Reg F 236 207 738 1181
P Res 72 97 540 709
Reg F 174 174 659 1007
P Res 61 79 453 593
Reg F 20.0% 17.5% 62.5% 100%
P Res 10.2% 13.7% 76.2% 100%
Reg F 17.3% 17.3% 65.4% 100%
P Res 10.3% 13.3% 76.4% 100%
Reg F 21.2% 17.8% 61.0% 100%
P Res 11.4% 14.6% 74.0% 100%
42
Reg F 16.8% 16.7% 66.5% 100%
P Res 10.5% 13.9% 75.6% 100%
Table 44. Frequencies and Percentages (Men vs. Women) on the item "overall, I am satisfied
with my job."
Reg F 333 317 1173 1823
P Res 108 145 800 1053
Reg F 73 62 219 354
P Res 24 30 184 238
Reg F 18.3% 17.4% 64.3% 100%
P Res 10.3% 13.8% 76.0% 100%
Reg F 20.6% 17.5% 61.9% 100%
P Res 10.1% 12.6% 77.3% 100%
Reg F 20.0% 17.3% 62.7% 100%
P Res 12.0% 15.9% 72.1% 100%
Reg F 21.3% 19.1% 59.6% 100%
P Res 8.4% 9.1% 82.5% 100%
the item “overall, I am satisfied with my job.”
43
Reg F 71 65 210 346
P Res 14 22 126 162
Reg F 133 106 397 636
P Res 75 99 506 680
Reg F 97 90 319 506
P Res 23 32 215 270
Reg F 109 120 471 700
P Res 21 23 146 190
Reg F 20.5% 18.8% 60.7% 100%
P Res 8.6% 13.6% 77.8% 100%
Reg F 20.9% 16.7% 62.4% 100%
P Res 11.0% 14.6% 74.4% 100%
Reg F 19.2% 17.8% 63.0% 100%
P Res 8.5% 11.9% 79.6% 100%
Reg F 15.6% 17.1% 67.3% 100%
P Res 11.1% 12.1% 76.8% 100%
Reg F 23.4% 18.3% 58.3% 100%
P Res 7.1%* 14.8% 78.2% 100%
44
Reg F 22.8% 17.5% 59.7% 100%
P Res 12.3% 14.8% 72.9% 100%
Reg F 19.7% 16.5% 63.8% 100%
P Res 8.5% 11.6% 79.9% 100%
Reg F 16.2% 18.1% 65.7% 100%
P Res 9.9% 14.4% 75.7% 100%

Table 46. Frequencies and Percentages (All Respondents) on the item "how would you rate the
current level of morale in your unit/workplace?"
Response Category Low Medium High Total
Reg F 628 829 632 2089
P Res 226 512 497 1235
Reg F 30.1% 39.7% 30.3% 100%
P Res 18.3% 41.5% 40.2% 100%
Reg F 34.4% 38.5% 27.1% 100%
P Res 21.6% 39.4% 39.0% 100%
Table 47. Frequencies and Percentages (Officers vs. NCM) on the item "how would you rate the
Reg F 395 412 304 1111
45
P Res 145 256 266 667
Reg F 233 417 328 978
P Res 81 256 231 568
Reg F 35.6% 37.1% 27.4% 100%
P Res 21.7% 38.4% 39.9% 100%
Reg F 23.8% 42.6% 33.5% 100%
P Res 14.3% 45.1% 40.7% 100%
Reg F 37.5% 37.2% 25.3% 100%
P Res 23.0% 38.2% 38.8% 100%
Reg F 23.0% 43.3% 33.7% 100%
P Res 15.5% 44.8% 39.7% 100%
Table 48. Frequencies and Percentages (Men vs. Women) on the item "how would you rate the
Reg F 519 693 535 1747
P Res 182 411 406 999
Reg F 104 132 96 332
P Res 42 98 85 225
Reg F 29.7% 39.7% 30.6% 100%
46
P Res 18.2% 41.1% 40.6% 100%
Reg F 31.3% 39.8% 28.9% 100%
P Res 18.7% 43.6% 37.8% 100%
Reg F 34.6% 38.1% 27.2% 100%
P Res 20.9% 39.9% 39.1% 100%
Reg F 32.8% 40.5% 26.7% 100%
P Res 24.8% 38.6% 36.6% 100%
the item “how would you rate the current level of morale in your workplace?”
Reg F 91 125 117 333
P Res 23 62 72 157
Reg F 196 248 160 604
P Res 127 263 252 642
Reg F 166 179 136 481
P Res 47 101 108 256
Reg F 175 277 219 671
P Res 29 86 65 180
Reg F 27.3% 37.5% 35.1% 100%
47
P Res 14.6% 39.5% 45.9% 100%
Reg F 32.5% 41.1% 26.5% 100%
P Res 19.8% 41.0% 39.3% 100%
Reg F 34.5% 37.2% 28.3% 100%
P Res 18.4% 39.5% 42.2% 100%
Reg F 26.1% 41.3% 32.6% 100%
P Res 16.1% 47.8% 36.1% 100%
Reg F 31.1% 37.4% 31.4% 100%
P Res 20.8% 33.7% 45.5% 100%
Reg F 37.9% 39.8% 22.3% 100%
P Res 22.5% 38.2% 39.3% 100%
Reg F 37.6% 36.1% 26.3% 100%
P Res 19.7% 39.6% 40.7% 100%
Reg F 29.1% 39.2% 31.7% 100%
P Res 18.3% 53.2% 28.5% 100%
Table 50. Frequencies and Percentages (All Respondents) on the item "how would you rate
your current individual level of morale?"
Reg F 507 753 830 2090
48
P Res 181 415 640 1236
Reg F 24.3% 36.0% 39.7% 100%
P Res 14.6% 33.6% 51.8% 100%
Reg F 25.9% 36.1% 37.9% 100%
P Res 16.0% 33.8% 50.2% 100%
Table 51. Frequencies and Percentages (Officers vs. NCM) on the item "how would you rate
Reg F 293 387 431 1111
P Res 109 218 342 669
Reg F 214 366 399 979
P Res 72 197 298 567
Reg F 26.4% 34.8% 38.8% 100%
P Res 16.3% 32.6% 51.1% 100%
Reg F 21.9% 37.4% 40.8% 100%
P Res 12.7% 34.7% 52.6% 100%
Reg F 27.2% 35.6% 37.2% 100%
P Res 16.6% 33.7% 49.7% 100%
49
Reg F 21.3% 38.0% 40.7% 100%
P Res 13.1% 34.4% 52.5% 100%
Table 52. Frequencies and Percentages (Men vs. Women) on the item "how would you rate
Reg F 427 629 692 1748
P Res 153 325 522 1000
Reg F 78 120 134 332
P Res 26 87 112 225
Reg F 24.4% 36.0% 39.6% 100%
P Res 15.3% 32.5% 52.2% 100%
Reg F 23.5% 36.1% 40.4% 100%
P Res 11.6% 38.7% 49.8% 100%
Reg F 26.2% 36.5% 37.3% 100%
P Res 17.5% 32.8% 49.7% 100%
Reg F 24.6% 33.6% 41.8% 100%
P Res 10.4% 38.8% 50.9% 100%
the item “how would you rate your current individual level of morale?”
50
Reg F 84 111 138 333
P Res 21 55 81 157
Reg F 150 222 233 605
P Res 103 206 335 644
Reg F 125 172 184 481
P Res 28 85 142 255
Reg F 148 248 275 671
P Res 29 69 82 180
Reg F 25.2% 33.3% 41.4% 100%
P Res 13.4% 35.0% 51.6% 100%
Reg F 24.8% 36.7% 38.5% 100%
P Res 16.0% 32.0% 52.0% 100%
Reg F 26.0% 35.8% 38.3% 100%
P Res 11.0% 33.3% 55.7% 100%
Reg F 22.1% 37.0% 41.0% 100%
P Res 16.1% 38.3% 45.6% 100%
Reg F 29.3% 32.2% 38.5% 100%
P Res 15.8% 30.3% 54.0% 100%
51
Reg F 26.2% 37.4% 36.4% 100%
P Res 16.7% 33.2% 50.2% 100%
Reg F 27.6% 35.1% 37.3% 100%
P Res 11.9% 33.1% 55.0% 100%
Reg F 22.7% 37.2% 40.1% 100%
P Res 14.7% 42.7% 42.6% 100%
Table 54. Frequencies and Percentages (All Respondents) on the item "I am proud to be in the
CAF."
Reg F 104 210 1747 2061
P Res 20 68 1144 1232
Reg F 5.0% 10.2% 84.8% 100%
P Res 1.6% 5.5% 92.9% 100%
Reg F 5.8% 11.0% 83.2% 100%
P Res 2.3% 6.1% 91.6% 100%
Table 55. Frequencies and Percentages (Officers vs. NCM) on the item "I am proud to be in the
CAF."
Reg F 63 120 907 1090
P Res 14 42 611 667
52
Reg F 41 90 840 971
P Res 6 26 533 565
Reg F 5.8% 11.0% 83.2% 100%
P Res 2.1% 6.3% 91.6% 100%
Reg F 4.2% 9.3% 86.5% 100%
P Res 1.1% 4.6% 94.3% 100%
Reg F 6.3% 11.5% 82.2% 100%
P Res 2.6% 6.5% 90.9% 100%
Reg F 4.0% 9.2% 86.9% 100%
P Res 1.1%* 4.3% 94.6% 100%

Table 56. Frequencies and Percentages (Men vs. Women) on the item "I am proud to be in the
CAF."
Reg F 86 182 1455 1723
P Res 19 53 925 997
Reg F 17 27 284 328
P Res ** ** 209 224
Reg F 5.0% 10.6% 84.4% 100%
P Res 1.9% 5.3% 92.8% 100%
53
Reg F 5.2% 8.2% 86.6% 100%
P Res ** ** 93.3% 100%
Reg F 5.8% 11.8% 82.4% 100%
P Res 2.9% 6.1% 91.0% 100%
Reg F 6.0% 6.4% 87.6% 100%
P Res ** ** 93.7% 100%

** Results are not reported due to the low number of respondents for this item. Only the results for agreement are
reported.
the item “I am proud to be in the CAF.”
Reg F 23 44 258 325
P Res 0 15 140 155
Reg F 30 58 505 593
P Res 11 28 602 641
Reg F 23 57 397 477
P Res 6 18 232 256
Reg F 28 51 587 666
P Res ** ** 170 180
Reg F 7.1% 13.5% 79.4% 100%
54
P Res 0.0% 9.7% 90.3% 100%
Reg F 5.1% 9.8% 85.2% 100%
P Res 1.7% 4.4% 93.9% 100%
Reg F 4.8% 11.9% 83.2% 100%
P Res 2.3% 7.0% 90.6% 100%
Reg F 4.2% 7.7% 88.1% 100%
P Res ** ** 94.4% 100%
Reg F 8.7% 16.1% 75.1% 100%
P Res 0.0%* 12.2% 87.8% 100%
Reg F 5.9% 11.5% 82.6% 100%
P Res 2.8%* 5.3% 92.0% 100%
Reg F 5.9% 11.5% 82.6% 100%
P Res 2.4%* 9.2% 88.4% 100%
Reg F 4.2% 7.7% 88.1% 100%
P Res ** ** 95.8% 100%

** Results are not reported due to the low number of respondents for this item. Only the results for agreement are
reported.
55

CAF Spring Your Say Survey 2017

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

CAF Spring Your Say Survey 2017

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

1DWLRQDO'HIHQFH 'pIHQVHQDWLRQDOH

Internal and External Environment during the Survey

Table 1. TTCP Benchmarking Items.

TTCP Benchmarking Items

1. Satisfaction with the military way of life.

2. Satisfaction with the way your career is being managed.

3. Satisfaction with your opportunities for promotion.

4. I am able to maintain a balance between my personal and working life.

5. My family supports my career in the CAF.

6. I am satisfied with the leadership provided by my immediate supervisor.

7. I trust my immediate supervisor.

8. I have confidence in the leadership of the CAF.

9. I am actively looking at leaving the CAF.

11. Overall, I am satisfied with my job.

14. I am proud to be in the CAF.

Response Category Dissatisfied Neutral Satisfied Total

Unweighted valid percent

Reg F 16.9% 9.9% 73.3% 100%

P Res 8.9% 7.5% 83.5% 100%

Weighted valid percent

Reg F 18.6% 11.1% 70.3% 100%

P Res 9.8% 9.3% 80.9% 100%

Response Category Dissatisfied Neutral Satisfied Total

Unweighted Frequency NCM

Unweighted Frequency Officer

Reg F 158 88 779 1025

P Res 47 38 517 602

Unweighted valid percent NCM

Reg F 18.1% 11.0% 70.9% 100%

P Res 9.9% 8.5% 81.6% 100%

Unweighted valid percent Officer

Reg F 15.4% 8.6% 76.0% 100%

P Res 7.8% 6.3% 85.9% 100%

Weighted valid percent NCM

Reg F 19.5% 11.7% 68.7% 100%

P Res 10.3% 9.9% 79.8% 100%

Weighted valid percent Officer

Reg F 15.0% 8.7% 76.3% 100%

P Res 7.5% 6.8% 85.7% 100%

Response Category Dissatisfied Neutral Satisfied Total

Unweighted Frequency Men

Reg F 317 189 1353 1859

P Res 93 82 891 1066

Unweighted Frequency Women

Reg F 55 31 273 359

P Res 22 17 203 242

Unweighted valid percent Men

Reg F 17.1% 10.2% 72.8% 100%

P Res 8.7% 7.7% 83.6% 100%

Unweighted valid percent Women

Reg F 15.3% 8.6% 76.0% 100%

P Res 9.1% 7.0% 83.9% 100%

Weighted valid percent Men

Reg F 19.4% 11.0% 69.6% 100%

P Res 9.8% 9.7% 80.5% 100%

Weighted valid percent Women

Reg F 13.1% 11.9% 75.0% 100%

P Res 9.7% 8.2% 82.1% 100%

Response Category Dissatisfied Neutral Satisfied Total

Unweighted Frequency Navy

Reg F 67 37 249 353

P Res 14 12 137 163

Unweighted Frequency Army

Reg F 109 67 469 645