Notice to all Public Officials:

The bearer of this NOTICE does hereby lawfully notify you that
you are commercially liable for any violation of his or her
rights, and that the bearer:

It is NOT the duty of the police to protect you.  

Their job is to protect THE CORPORATION and arrest code breakers. 
(SAPP vs. Tallahassee, 348 So. 2nd. 363, Reiff vs. City of Phila. 477 F. 1262, 
Lynch vs. NC Dept. of Justice 376 S.E. 2nd. 247)

“All codes, rules and regulations are applicable to the govern-mint authorities
only, not human/Creators in accordance with God’s laws. All codes, rules and
regulations are unconstitutional and lacking in due process …” Rodriquez v Ray
Donavan (U.S. Department of Labor), 769 F. 2d 1344, 1348 (1985).

1) Reserves all religious, constitutional, civil, human, and sovereign rights.

2) Will not consent to any search of their person or property.
3) Will not answer any questions without a ‘public servant questionnaire'
pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974 USC sec. 88 stat. 1896 (1974).
4) Will hold liable under full commercial liability for damages through civil suit
any public servant who deprives them of, knowingly allows them to be
deprived of, conspires to deprive them of, is “negligent through deliberate
indifference to”, or discriminates against these reserved unalienable rights
pursuant to Title 42 (Equal Rights Under the Law) particularly 42 USC 1981,
1983, 1985, 1984,
18 USC 241 and 242.
5) Will exercise the spiritual tenants of their personal creed under protection of
the first amendment and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993.

Public Officials who violate their oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution may
be liable for civil suit, criminal charges, and/or class action suits.

FEE SCHEDULE
Twenty (20) Ounces of .999 gold (or its equivalent) per violation of any of my
unalienable rights under any and all circumstances included in these rights
hereby claimed are my right to make use of roads, busses, train, and air stations;
the right to contract, engage in trade and habitation peacefully.

SUPREME COURT CASE:

Kolender v. Lawson (461 U.S. 352, 1983) in which the United States
Supreme Court ruled that a police officer could not arrest a citizen merely
for refusing to present identification.
There is no such thing as “Failure to identify”. You can Sue the Police for
an illegal Arrest. Showing identification is a courtesy and they
(police officers) CANNOT determine if your ID is valid or not.
Public Servant Questionnaire
Authority-Privacy Act 5 USC Sec. 553a, Stat. 1896 (1974)
Pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974, full written disclosure is mandatory for any government official
or public servant who is seeking information before any personal and private (not public) information
will be provided in any form

ATTENTION: Any government agency, department or agent requesting

information from this private Man or Woman; please fill out the following
regarding your demand:
1) Public servant's full legal name:________________________________________
2) Public servant's resident address:____________________________________________

3) Name of agency:__________
4) Name of supervisor & office address:

5) Will public servant uphold the United States of America and Louisiana state Constitution?
() YES () NO
6) State ID #____________________ Badge #____________
Bonding agency and Bond #_________________________
7) Will public servant furnish a copy of law that authorizes request?
8) Will public servant read aloud the law authorizing request?_
9) Are answers to public servant's questions voluntary or mandatory
10) Are questions based on specific law or are they a discovery process?
11) What other uses may be made of this information?_______
12) What other agencies have access to this information?____
13) What will be the effect upon me if any or all questions are not answered?

14) Have you consulted, questioned, interviewed or received information from any third party,
other agency or government source relating to this matter?_____________
15) If yes, enter name of any and all such parties_______________________

16) Do you reasonably anticipate either a civil or criminal action to be initiated or pursued based?
on the information you seek?_______________________________________
17) Is there a file of records, information or correspondence related to me being maintained by?
agency?_____________________________________________________
18)Will the public servant guarantee that the information in this agency's files will not be used by any
other department other than the one by which (s)he is employed? () YES () NO

I hereby sign and affirm under penalty of perjury and under full commercial
liability that the answers hereby given are true and correct in every particular.

Signature of public servant

Date

"The acceptance of a license, in whatever form, will not impose upon the licensee
an obligation to respect or to comply with any provision of the statute or with the
regulations prescribed that are repugnant to the Constitution of the United States."
W. W. CARGILL CO. v. STATE OF MINNESOTA, 180 U.S. 452 (1901) 180 U.S.
452
Also see…
“Speeding, running stop signs, traveling without license plates, or registration are
not threats to the public safety, and thus are not arrestable offenses.” Christy v.
Elliot, 216 I 131, 74 HE 1035, LRA NS 1905-1910