Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DNS
07 04 21
Notes
SL. THE HINDU
TOPICS
NO. PAGE NO.
5 QOD
1. UPSC Current Affairs: Reworking net-zero for climate justice | Page 08
UPSC Syllabus: Mains – GS Paper III – Environment
Sub Theme: Climate change| climate justice | UPSC
Why are countries aiming to keep global temperature rise below 1.5°C?
Scientists have warned for years of catastrophic environmental consequences if global temperature
continues to rise at the current pace. The Earth’s average temperature has already increased
approximately 1°C above preindustrial levels. In a 2018 special report, the IPCC predicted that
without dramatic reductions in carbon emissions, the world will hit 1.5°C of warming between 2030
and 2052.
The report summarizes many of the effects expected to occur when global temperature reaches that
point:
Date: 07-Apr-2021 DNS Notes - Revision
Heat waves. Many regions would suffer more hot days, with about 14 percent of people worldwide
being exposed to periods of severe heat at least once every five years.
Droughts and floods. Regions would be more susceptible to droughts and floods, making farming
more difficult, lowering crop yields, and causing food shortages.
Rising seas. Tens of millions of people live in coastal regions that would be submerged in the coming
decades. Small island nations are particularly vulnerable.
Arctic ice thaws. At least once a century, the Arctic would experience a summer with no sea ice,
which has not happened in at least two thousand years. Forty percent of the Arctic’s permafrost would
thaw by the end of the century.
Species loss. More insects, plants, and vertebrates would be at risk of extinction.
The consequences will be far worse if the 2°C threshold is reached, scientists say. “We’re headed
toward disaster if we can’t get our warming in check and that we need to do this very quickly,” says
Alice C. Hill, CFR senior fellow for energy and the environment.
Developing countries argue that developed countries have emitted more greenhouse gases over time.
They say these developed countries should now carry more of the burden because they were able to
grow their economies without restraint. Indeed, the United States has emitted the most of all time,
followed by the European Union.
However, China and India are now among the world’s top annual emitters, along with the United
States. Developed countries have argued that those countries must do more now to address climate
change.
In the context of this debate, major climate agreements have evolved in how they pursue emissions
reductions. The Kyoto Protocol required only developed countries to reduce emissions, while the Paris
Agreement recognized that climate change is a shared problem and called on all countries to set
emissions targets.
Shrinking of Cryosphere:
Glacial retreat
Glaciers are retreating almost
Date: 07-Apr-2021 DNS Notes - Revision
Ocean Acidification:
Since the beginning of the Industrial
Revolution, the acidity of surface
ocean waters has increased by about
30 percent.
Concerns
Conflict between developed and developing countries
On 'transparency':
o Developed countries want a 'common and unified' system to compare the climate
actions undertaken under INDCs. Developing countries, however, want the CBDR-RC
principle to be reflected in the transparency provision.
o 'Stocktake' provision for estimating the progress in the implementation of INDCs in 5
years. However, the developed countries want to put mitigation aspect specific and
Date: 07-Apr-2021 DNS Notes - Revision
hold everyone accountable for that but not the finance and technology transfer
provision.
The principle of 'historical responsibility' is conveniently ignored, only current emissions are
the basis of comparing mitigation strategies. So even if China uses more coal than India, it is
ignored because there is an incremental decline even though from a very large base. This is not
equity.
Voluntary nature of INDC: commitments are voluntary, which means there is no penalty for
failing to meet them. And even if they are met, they will not put the world on a path to less
than 2oC of warming. Under the most optimistic assumptions, the INDCs still set us on a path
to 2.7 to 3.5oC of warming.
Lack of Action on Fossil Fuel: The U.N. approach has been to get countries to offer cuts in
emissions and increases in renewable energy deployment, energy efficiency, or carbon sinks,
but it has not called for restraining fossil fuel development.
Ignorance of Traditional Rights: Indigenous rights of people suffering due to activities like
fossil fuel extraction are mentioned in the preamble, but left out entirely of the operational text.
Non-compliance by the biggest emitter: INDCs of rich countries are not enough to meet their
historical obligations. Recently, U.S. withdraws from Paris Agreement poses threat to the very
foundation of deal.
Unmet financial commitments: The promise of contributing $100 bn annually to the Green
Climate Fund by developed countries is still unmet. Although, the contribution has been
increased, yet it is enormously short of what is actually needed.
Date: 07-Apr-2021 DNS Notes - Revision
Date: 07-Apr-2021 DNS Notes - Revision
Date: 07-Apr-2021 DNS Notes - Revision
Handover to China:
As the 99-year treaty was to expire on July 1, 1997, both Britain and China signed a joint
declaration on the future of Hong Kong in 1984. Under the joint declaration, an innovative “one
country, two systems” was devised, under which Hong Kong reverted to Chinese sovereignty while
retaining its political and economic system.
The political process in Hong Kong is guided as per the province’s Basic Law, and it has two main
features:
The socialist system and policies shall not be practiced in the Hong Kong Special Administrative
Region, and the previous capitalist system and way of life shall remain unchanged for 50 years.
The Chief Executive (CE) is the highest representative leader in Hong Kong and he shall be selected
by election or through consultations held locally and be appointed by the Central People's
Government. The ultimate aim is the selection of the Chief Executive by universal suffrage upon
nomination by a nominating committee.
Current Perspective:
Geographical Significance
Hong Kong forms a part of the Pearl River Delta Metropolitan Region where the Pearl River flows
into the South China Sea. It is the wealthiest region in South China & the largest urban area in the
world in both size and population.
It includes major economic centers such as Guangzhou, Shenzhen and Macau. Its GDP is at $1.2
trillion, which make it the largest economic region in South East Asia, above Indonesia.
The main crux of the tension is about the right to universal suffrage in selecting the highest
governing personnel in Hong Kong, whereby it is the Chinese government that nominates
individuals who then can stand for Chief Executive. China wants its control on the nominations
process wherein China nominates only Pro-Chinese government individuals that do not critique
Chinese policies in Hong Kong. The pro-democracy activists prefer a more direct election process.
Apart from this, when Hong Kong was handed over to China in 1997, it was a major source of
economic investment into mainland China, however the growth of Chinese economy has allowed
Chinese government to increase stronghold of Hong Kong.
The are several cultural differences between Hong Kong and China, whereby Mainland China is a
Mandarin speaking region, while Hong Kong is a Cantonese speaking region. Hong Kong considers
itself culturally distinct from China like other countries of Indo-China region.
Editorial Context:
Hong Kong is currently witnessing anti-government and pro-democracy protests, wherein the a bill
has been introduced to allow Hong Kong courts to allow extradition to mainland China, which
would allow China to legally take actions against anti-China activists.
China has hinted at using People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to quell the protests, however according
to author this may lead to a similar fallout as the Tiananmen square incident in 1989, in which PLA
killed thousands of pro-democracy protesters. This would not be tolerated by other countries such
as the U.S., UK and EU.
China for now has put on hold the law, but the protests are still continuing.
Context: Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) has modified the guidelines for transfer and posting of
officials in the vigilance units of government organisations, restricting their tenure to three years at one
place. The tenure may be extended to three more years, but at a different place of posting. It would mean
that the personnel can have two continuous postings in vigilance units, at two different places of posting,
each running into a maximum of three years.
The CVC, in its order, said undue long stay of an official in a vigilance department had the potential
of developing vested interests, apart from giving rise to unnecessary complaints or allegations.
The Commission has modified its earlier guidelines to ensure transparency, objectivity and
uniformity in its approach.
Personnel who have worked for over three years at one place should be transferred in phases,
with priority given to those who have served for the maximum period.
CVC has ordered to transfer such officials who have completed more than 5 years of service in
vigilance units in one place on a priority basis.
So, in the first phase, at least 10% of such personnel should be shifted in a sequential order
without any exception.
In case someone has served at one place for over three years, his/her tenure at the next place
would be curtailed to ensure that the combined tenure was limited to six years.
Review the progress of applications pending with the competent authorities for sanction of
prosecution under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
(Section 20 of Lokpal & Lokayukta Act) - Conduct inquiries into complaints referred by Lokpal as per the
Lokpal and Lokayukta Act, 2013. Central Vigilance Commission in respect of complaints referred to it
after making preliminary enquiry –
In respect of public servants belonging to Group A and Group B - shall submit its report to the Lokpal.
In case of public servants belonging to Group C and Group D - the Commission shall proceed in
accordance with the provisions of the Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003.
Members
The Commission shall consists of-
Central Vigilance Commissioner who shall be the Chairperson
Not more than 2 Vigilance Commissioners as Members
Appointment
Central Vigilance Commissioner and other Vigilance Commissioners shall be appointed by the President
by warrant under his hand and seal.
The appointment shall be made after obtaining the recommendation of a Committee consisting of-
Prime Minister – Chairperson
Minister of Home Affairs – Member
Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha – Member
Central Vigilance Commissioner shall be ineligible for appointment in the Commission when
he/she ceases to hold office.
Vigilance Commissioner shall be eligible for appointment as Central Vigilance Commissioner
On ceasing to hold office, Central Vigilance Commissioner and every other Vigilance Commissioner
shall be ineligible for further employment to any office of profit under Government of India or
government of any State.
Tenure
Central Vigilance Commissioner and every Vigilance Commissioner shall hold office for
a term of 4 years from the date of his/her appointment or
till he/she attains the age of 65 years (whichever is earlier)
Resignation
Central Vigilance Commissioner or a Vigilance Commissioner may by writing under his hand addressed to
the President, resign their office.
Removal
The Central Vigilance Commissioner or any Vigilance Commissioner shall be removed from his office
only by order of the President on the ground of proved misbehaviour or incapacity
after the Supreme Court, on a reference made to it by the President, has, on inquiry, reported that
the Central Vigilance Commissioner or any Vigilance Commissioner should be removed on such
grounds.
(b) Further employment to any office of profit under the Government of India or the Government of a
State.
The salary and allowances payable to and the other conditions of service of
(a) Central Vigilance Commissioner shall be the same as those of the Chairman of the Union Public
Service Commission.
(b) Vigilance Commissioner shall be the same as those of a Member of the Union Public Service
Commission.
4. UPSC Current Affairs: Justice Ramana will be the next CJI | Page 01
UPSC Syllabus: Mains – GS Paper II – Polity
Sub Theme: Chief Justice of India| UPSC
N.V. Ramana, the senior most judge of the Supreme Court, has been recommended as the next top judge by the
present Chief Justice of India (S A Bobde). He will take over as the 48th Chief Justice of India
(CJI) from 24th April 2021. He would be the CJI till 26th August, 2022.
For the appointment of other judges in the Supreme Court there is collegium system. The collegium is
headed by the Chief Justice of India and comprises four other senior most judges of the court. The collegium
system has evolved through judgments of the Supreme Court (Judges Cases), and not by an Act of
Parliament or by a provision of the Constitution.