Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Job rotations
Micro-learning
Self-paced e-learning
50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90
On-the-job training
Instructor-led classroom
Manager coaching and support
Simulations and role-plays
Action learning assignments (hands-on learning opportunities)
Reinforcement and review of learning after a training event
Mentoring programs
Blended learning
Stretch/challenge assignments
Informal learning methods
360-degree feedback tools
Job rotations
Action learning assignments (hands-on learning opportunities)
Reinforcement and review of learning after a training event
Mentoring programs
Blended learning
Stretch/challenge assignments
Informal learning methods
360-degree feedback tools
Job rotations
Instructor-led online/remote (virtual learning)
Micro-learning
University/college programs (including executive education)
Video-based training
Self-paced e-learning
Game-like components (leader boards, competition, etc.)
Learning portals
Open-source programs (MOOCS, YouTube.com, etc.)
Learning libraries
Mobile learning
Social media networks
Virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), or artificial intelligence (AI)
0 10 20 30 40 50
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
0-10% 11-20% 21-30% 31-40% 41-60% 60-100%
No leadership gaps
Best-in-class leaders
No leadership gaps
Best-in-class leaders
Graph
Q1- top 6: Priority
five leadership skillsLeadership Skills
counts (number selected) Low Mod High Total
Leadership character
Developing and coaching others 146 88 110 344 1
Communication skills Influencing others 99 65 69 233 2
Performance management Motivating others 72 49 46 167 3
Developing
Emotional intelligence skillsthemselves 71 40 55 166 4
Team leadership
Interpersonal relationship skills 65 42 45 152 5
Strategy development
Decision-making and and alignment
problem-solving 54 42 53 149 6
Change leadership Taking accountability 63 39 45 147 7
Creating engagementProviding feedback 58 38 39 135 8
Providing feedbackCreating engagement 57 30 43 130 9
Taking accountability Change leadership 45 37 41 123 10
Decision-making and problem-solving 38 41 37 116 11
Strategy development and alignment
Interpersonal relationship skills 44 27 33 104 12
Team leadership
Developing themselves 45 28 26 99 13
Emotional intelligence skills
Motivating others 31 30 29 90 14
Performance management
Influencing others 33 25 32 90 15
Leadership character Communication skills 24 19 22 65 16
Developing
Other (please and coaching others
specify) 208 139 156 503
0% 10% 20% 30% answered40%
question 50%229 60%
Low High
Q2- How are needed skills identified
counts (A + SA) Low Mod High Total
Executive leadership team decides 101 69 70 240 1
Graph 7: How leadership development needs
Informal interviews with leaders 98
are identified
76 83 257 2
Leaders' managers identify needed skills 103 71 79 253 3
Outside experts help determine leadership needs
Leaders themselves identify needed skills 119 82 104 305 4
Formal needs analysis is conducted 60 54 63 177 5
Tools from
Tools from outside outside experts/vendors
experts/vendors 24 19 25 68 6
Outside experts help determine leadership needs 24 16 21 61 7
Other (pleaseFormal
specify)
needs analysis is conducted 208 139 156 503
answered question 229
Leaders themselves identify needed skills
Q3-How would
Leaders'you rate the
managers effectiveness
identify needed skillsof the different
leadership development methods you use? (percent
Not using)
Informal interviews with leaders
Self-paced e-learning 39 12 11 62
On-the-job training 14 8 5 27
Micro-learning 97 53 35 185
Blended
Reinforcement learning after event
and review 49 22 7 78
Micro-learning
Stretch/challenge assignments 78 35 25 138
VR, AR, or AI
counts 10% 20% 30% Low40% Mod 50% High 60% total 70% 80%
VR, AR, or AI 3 14 17 34
Mobile learning 19 21 32 72
Micro-learning 54 45 63 162
Learning libraries 20 32 31 83
Are involved in leadership program kick-off and launch 128 119 141 sig
meetings Sponsor leadership community initiatives
0% 20%
0% 20%
Communicate and model the organization’s leadership 110 109 141
philosophy and model
Low Moderate High
total count 208 139 153
answered question 229
skipped question 313
Q7-How effective has your investment been in creating organizational performance improvement at each level of
leadership
Count (SA) Low Mod High
C-level/VP/MD level 26 53 81
Middle Manager and Director 54 74 79
Supervisory level 68 70 74
Non-management professionals 57 64 79
High potentials 55 56 83
Average 52 63.4 79.2
count 201 136 155
answered question 229
skipped question 313
Q10-investment change
Investment Change Low Mod High
Decrease Significantly
Decrease slightly
Stay the same
Increase slightly
Increase significantly
Other (please specify) 171 101 119
answered question 229
skipped question 313
Q14-Future of work
SA + agree Low Mod High
Q21-developing newfocus
We have a clear leaders
on developing the next generation of leaders
counts (A + SA) Low Mod High group
We have sufficient
Effectively resources to develop
recruit candidates the next positions
to leadership generation of leaders 1
0-100%
60% 65% 70%
Virtual learning
65.9% 75.5% 87.2% 75.1%
Self-paced e-learning
81.3% 91.4% 92.9% 87.7%
Video-based training
71.2% 79.1% 85.9% 77.9%
On-the-job training
93.3% 94.2% 96.8% 94.6%
Mentoring programs
65.4% 79.9% 89.1% 76.7%
Micro-learning
53.4% 61.9% 77.6% 63.2%
Blended learning
70.2% 82.7% 91.0% 80.1%
Job rotations
44.2% 56.1% 65.4% 54.1%
Stretch/challenge assignments
62.5% 74.8% 84.0% 72.6%
University/college programs
54.8% 64.7% 71.2% 62.6%
total
answered question
skipped question
Instructor-led classroom
63.5% 76.3% 76.3% 71.0%
Virtual learning
22.1% 31.7% 48.1% 32.8%
Self-paced e-learning
22.1% 30.9% 35.3% 28.6%
Video-based training
17.3% 30.2% 37.8% 27.2%
On-the-job training
67.8% 78.4% 87.8% 76.9%
Mentoring programs
37.0% 59.0% 71.2% 53.7%
Micro-learning
26.0% 32.4% 40.4% 32.2%
Blended learning
41.8% 56.1% 71.2% 54.9%
Job rotations
25.0% 33.8% 48.1% 34.6%
Stretch/challenge assignments
38.0% 65.5% 62.8% 53.3%
University/college programs
25.0% 32.4% 39.1% 31.4%
total
answered question
skipped question
Q5- Use of mindfulness Training
Percent (A+SA) Low Moderate High delta
We include mindfulness activities in our leadership 23.6% 34.5% 46.8% 23.2%
development programs
We have a complete program on Mindfulness 7.2% 18.0% 30.8% 23.6%
techniques
We encourage leaders to practice mindfulness 27.4% 36.0% 55.8% 28.4%
Mindfulness activities are an important part of our 23.6% 36.0% 51.9% 28.4%
culture
We do not see value in mindfulness 23.6% 25.2% 26.3% 2.7%
total
answered question
skipped question
Are involved in leadership program kick-off and launch 61.5% 85.6% 92.2%
meetings
Moderate High
20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120%
Communicate and model the organization’s leadership 52.9% 78.4% 92.2%
philosophy and model
Moderate High
total
answered question
skipped question
Q7-How effective has your investment been in creating organizational performance improvement at each level of
leadership
Percent A+SA Low Moderate High delta
C-level/VP/MD level 12.9% 39.0% 52.3% 39.3%
Middle Manager and Director 26.9% 54.4% 51.0% 24.1%
Supervisory level 33.8% 51.5% 47.7% 13.9%
Non-management professionals 28.4% 47.1% 51.0% 22.6%
High potentials 27.4% 41.2% 53.5% 26.2%
Average 25.9% 46.6% 51.1% 25.2%
total
answered question
skipped question
Q10-investment change
Investment Change Low Moderate High
Decrease Significantly 2.4 1.4 1.3
Decrease slightly 4.8 7.1 3.2
Stay the same 39.9 35 37.8
Increase slightly 38.5 39.3 46.2
Increase significantly 14.4 17.1 11.5
Increase
Increase
skipped question
Q14-Future of work
Strongly Agree Low Moderate High
Effectively attract younger employees into leadership 38.6% 61.7% 86.8% 48.2%
positions
Increased diversity of our leadership team 41.6% 60.0% 84.4% 42.8%
We have sufficient resources to develop the next 19.8% 29.5% 63.8% 44.0%
50% 60% generation
70% 80% of leaders
90% 100%
We have a clear focus on developing the next 19.9% 42.6% 80.5% 60.6%
generation of leaders
Executives prioritize developing the next generation of 31.4% 56.6% 82.7% 51.3%
leaders
Strong bench strength of new potential leaders 22.1% 42.2% 77.9% 55.8%
Have a succession plan for key positions 15.1% 32.2% 62.7% 47.6%
Take steps to leverage talents of current leaders to 27.5% 50.4% 81.0% 53.5%
develop the next generation
total 75 129 124
answered question
skipped question
Q23 - What approaches do you take to support the next generation of leaders
0% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
Strongly Agree+Agree Low Moderate High delta
rate High Have current managers record videos/audios of critical 9.6% 11.5% 12.2% 2.6%
processes
Use collaborative platforms to share knowledge 27.9% 39.6% 47.4% 19.6%
Give next generation leaders stretch assignments 40.9% 46.8% 55.1% 14.3%
Have new leaders rotate positions 24.0% 32.4% 35.3% 11.2%
Provide on-the-job coaching 53.4% 60.4% 66.0% 12.7%
Have structured job shadowing 28.4% 30.9% 44.9% 16.5%
total
answered question
skipped question
229
Total
48%
51%
50%
61%
35%
14%
12%
229
frequently
is each of
the
following
description
s true
concernin
g how
your
organizati
on Delta
makes
decisions
on L&D
2%
investment
?
9%
6%
9%
7%
5%
11% 3
1%
11% 4
4%
10% 5
8%
9%
6%
-8%
14% 2
7%
4%
15% 1
10% 6
10% 7
9% 9
10% 8
8%
229
313
frequently
is each of
the
following
description
s true
concernin
g how
your
organizati
on Delta
makes
decisions
on L&D
8%
investment
?
11% 7
7%
5%
10%
10%
5%
9%
17% 2
8%
6%
7%
7%
9%
13% 5
19% 1
2%
16% 3
11%
13% 6
10%
11% 8
15% 4
6%
229
313
229
313
Implement knowledge
Measure Managers pe
229
313
229
313
229
313
Percent of organ
Development
8
2
229
1
313
0
Low
229
313
229
313
229
313
229
313
229
313
229
313
Effective and Highly Effective
Stretch/challenge assignments
Blended learning
Mentoring programs
Virtual learning
0
Low Moderate High
60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0%
hip development
the customer
t identified top leadership skills that will be focused on in this year.
g/performance metrics
ty in leadership
adership. Without change it is merely managing. Change is different from management because there is an element of trust in
ship skills, however there is a small external program that shows a token effort
ve Practices
ge of business practices.
with supervisors/leaders
d help in delivering a future strategy. We then needed to use a diagnostic to describe where we were presently on those behav
Job rotations
Micro-learning
Self-paced e-learning
50 55 60 65
19
65 70 75 80 85 90
Video-based training
Self-paced e-learning
Learning portals
Learning libraries
Mobile learning
In what other ways do top executives show their support for leadership development?Tags
Regular Match of leadership development with set organisation goal
By helping in the decision to admit participants to the leadership programs, thereby endorsing the program goals an
Personal feedback intermittently given informally
They also attend and participate in the leadership development training workshops.
Top executives show up at ILT events and show their support for the material being covered
Leadership involvement is always very impactful, and tends to act as "modeling opportunities" for leaders to encour
Prioritizing by protecting leadership development budgets.
communicating regularly with people
Give funds
Top executives attend, participate, learn from the LDP.
They find sponsorship for leadership development training programs.
Use of professional coach with newly promoted Directors/Senior Managers or HIPOs
Our top executives could use some help practicing what they preach. :(
Walk the walk
Defining and publishing core values.
They do not, and that's where our problem starts.
Sponsor or mentor
They actively participate and facilitate in Leadership Development ILT and OJT activities
Role Modelling key
Regularly talk about it on webinars and at critical meetings. Developing our people is one of our company's operatin
Dedicate
They "let-go"timeand
andbecome
funds forpersonally
develomentvulnerable during the Simulations _x000D_
.tps://vimeo.com/138751875 They get totally involved to prove they are not Self-Deceived
na
Discussions during succession planning
Talk about, participate when asked, but no strategic effort regarding leadership development across the organizatio
They participate in the learning
Participate in training opportunities on occasion.
It is critical for Top Leaders to share the need which supports the culture of the organization
by recognising both bottom up and top down processes. By creating a more even relationship across the company
Top execs, sponsors Emerson training within all facets of the organization.
To always be present in meetings and to add their input into email strings to show their engagement.
Participation and championing the programs.
Top executives identify strategic initiatives to be used as challenge assignments, with participant recommendations
Monthly 1-hour update recorded meetings, leadership book club and discussions, annual statewide Summit confere
Participating in program design discussions
Financial commitment
Update the mission and vision statements to reflect this.
it all depends
As executive sponsors for our major leadership development initiatives such as our physician leadership academy a
I believe they should but do not currently do so at this organization.
Participate in final presentation events at the end of course, to evaluate impact of training. Also supporting professio
to be honest our executives talk a lot about leadership development but fail to be involved and could probably do w
Not all top executives display interest. We have varied business - few business heads actively contribute to leaders
Mention the importance of inclusive environment and challenges faced by women and minorities.
None
Administrators' general assembly
Dedicating resources and ensuring developing leaders' time is available--that is, excuse them from their regular dut
The leadership program at my company is only for top performers, and is seen by the organization as our first optio
As mentors and informal meetings such as "Lunch with Leaders" were there is no specific agenda and leadership p
Bonuses are dependent on development.
I think your list covers it.
Somewhat, depending on the initiative.
On going initiatives such as group book readings and application discussions. Not a "one-and done", "check it off th
Top Execs support and encourage strategic initiatives cross-functionally
By being the primary driver in annual performance reviews and goal setting.
Modeling the behavior, calling attention when behavior is outside of model and stating the model decision.
Give honest feedback
They attend the in-class sessions with every other employee attending (equal expectation, equal accountability). T
None
none at all
Lack of senior involvement is a primary reason why it is lagging
They always seem more interested in their own development than that of the team.
approve money for training
Ensure that they vocalize support for training initiatives that are designed to develop effective leaders, include in pe
Involvement in planning training sessions
Town hall meetings
Speaking at talent development (not leadership) courses
hold their direct reports accountable for commitment throughout the organization and develop actionable results
Hired outside contractor to facilitate a 4 day training on Coaching. It was not effective.
encourage self-motivated development
Executive team participate with other leaders from the business in internal training courses e.g. coaching program a
I'm not pivy to the information regarding above at my level.
Funding sources
Top executives are not involved much in the leadership development program. It's kind of we need this, and that's i
Recommend people to attend the training. Stop by and visit/check-in while the training is occurring. Follow-up with t
N/A
Priority emphasis on utilization of "Trust Edge" Principles across all continues of programs, services and staff levels
Encourage potential leaders to seek education on their own. No company support
There is a strong ownership culture here that encourages innovation and risk taking.
The company is focused on developing and attracting stronger leaders to the organization.
Top executives select employees in their overall departments to participate in our highest level of leadership develo
Free participants to attend programs. Backfill clinical positions so that participants can attend.
Working with Learning & Development to prioritize these efforts.
Mentoring
take a 360 themselves, "walk the walk", mentor/coach, help their people to fulfill their potential
One Executive (our CHRO) will kick off programs, but no other executives are involved. That's why I disagreed with
They do not.
Corporate Town Hall meetings; communications with "All Employees", posting on Intranet
Co-facilitate a leadership session or provide color commentary. Their presence is magical.
The leadership path has to be an engaging one. The overt commitment of the top team to a changing strategy is si
There is little to no support shown within this agency.
Although not historically given a spotlight by executive level leadership, this is a key focus area at the enterprise lev
not much
Attend the training themselves.
Recognition programs
Guest speaker during leadership development classes.
I have seen zero support for leadership development, which is a big part of the problem. Our "leaders" need training
Lead a book club specifically on Lead Dev books (Measure What Matters, 7 Habits, Good to Great)
Fully live the approach themselves - leading by example
Top executives should model appropriate leadership in showing support for leadership development of all employee
Lip service only.
Through providing on-the-job project-based opportunities.
Several development programs open to all employees, we have several execs participating in as regular participant
The top execs leave us with the impression they don't care, we are here to just get the work done. However, we ha
Regular interaction
The talk with no action, ownership, or accountability
Employing our internal instructional design team to custom create a leadership program that meets the specific nee
Emailed articles about leadership
C-suite leaders comply with all aspects of our in-house university and required training completion for our organizat
Support individual leadership growth efforts.
N/a
They participate as learners and demonstrate/role model an investment in their own professional and personal deve
If I understand this question correctly you are asking if these things happen in my organization. This is how I answe
Role modeling the expectations and personally checking in with the active participants.
The best example of leadership development shows in the people who are being developed. The culture of leaders
active participation and sponsorship of community non-profit activities to provide learning opportunities
Endorse
Through company-wide communications - quarterly newsletters and weekly short blogs
They talk about wanting it, but for the most part are not involved, and do not work with it.
Mention them at company or team meetings, help create curriculum, tirelessly promote and support the leadership
Top Executives seen/participate in learning environments by/with other staff
They recognize the need for developing leaders across the organization and as the singleton overseeing any needs
tives at your company.
Agree Agree Strongly Total
36.53% 255 14.18% 99 698
44.14% 309 33.57% 235 700
38.90% 270 17.00% 118 694
44.21% 309 38.05% 266 699
39.19% 272 14.70% 102 694
48.20% 335 18.42% 128 695
42.84% 299 19.05% 133 698
44.29% 310 21.43% 150 700
44.62% 311 28.41% 198 697
122
Answered 705
Skipped 15
eir engagement.
use them from their regular duties to attend training. Not expecting the leader to do all of their work AND attend training. Also, o
e organization as our first option when considering filling positions, especially the more senior positions.
ecific agenda and leadership program participants get to ask them questions.
"one-and done", "check it off the list" attitude toward leadership development. Have "changed seats on the bus" for some peo
ation, equal accountability). They talk about their own development at employee forums, etc.
effective leaders, include in performance appraisals and retain based on personal accountability (leaders are taking classes an
ourses e.g. coaching program and/ or sales training programs, delivered in house by accredited trainers. Courses both run for w
grams, services and staff levels. (Clarity, Compassion, Character, Competency, Commitment, Connection, Contribution, Consis
ed. That's why I disagreed with all the statements that used the plural, "executives."
am to a changing strategy is significant in establishing a momentum for change. How the leaders then engage the followers, a
veloped. The culture of leadership within the organization would speak volumes over any other example.
ning opportunities
ote and support the leadership development program, if it doesn't come from the top than hard to inculcate the importance and
singleton overseeing any needs analysis, or recommendation for training, I am often left out of the loop on budget, critical HR da
AND attend training. Also, overtly supporting the training.
ats on the bus" for some people who are unable/unwilling to develop in this area.
aders are taking classes and applying what they learn back in the workplace.)
ners. Courses both run for weekly for 9 weeks, with formal graduation. Executive team attend graduation and bear witness to c
ection, Contribution, Consistency). Top executives communicate this emphasis in a variety of formats.
hen engage the followers, and show significance of the intervention with their actions is vital to success
and developing talent. It's a breath of fresh air, yet a long uphill battle to create and maintain the culture our new exec seeks.
oop on budget, critical HR data to drive decisions, or present at meetings where leadership development may be discussed. I g
tion and bear witness to commitments given in graduation speeches.
ure our new exec seeks. This culture change is currently in the zygote phase.
ent may be discussed. I get my information through trial and error as I am not a recognized manager.
Leadership Development Survey 2019
Mindfulness: Some organizations have incorporated mindfulness training (for example, meditation
Strongly Disagree
We include mindfulness activities in our leadership development pro 33.24%
We have a complete program on mindfulness techniques. 42.00%
We encourage leaders to practice mindfulness in their day-to-day wo 31.29%
Mindfulness activities are an important part of our work environment. 30.80%
We do not see any value to including mindfulness activities in our pr 30.98%
Other comments about mindfulness training (please specify):
Tags
ree do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
Leadership Development Survey 2019
How do you measure the effectiveness of leadership development efforts? Indicate how frequently
Almost Nev
Measure participants’ reactions and satisfaction with the program 4.01%
Measure the participants’ managers’ perceptions of the impact on thei 10.58%
Implement knowledge tests after the program 23.40%
Assess participants’ direct reports’ perceptions (360-degree feedba 30.71%
Conduct formal performance reviews before and after completing a 33.91%
Measure the link between leadership development and improvement i 28.71%
Are there other ways you assess the effectiveness of your leadership development efforts? (please specify)
e other ways you assess the effectiveness of your leadership development efforts? (please Tags specify)
Action learning
Select impact studies (up to ROI analysis) of pilot or biz critical initiatives
tracking internal promotions and reduction in voluntary turnover among leadership development program participan
We do pre and post self-evaluations as well as with their supervisor. We would like to do more 360s.
Observation of implementation of tools and principles
We are finally beginning to get the Leadership Development baked in to the business plan
na
Get everyone involved in creating the underlying Structural Framework (the Constitution) that THEY want to drive th
Direct feedback from managers.
Company engagement surveys
Kirkpatrick levels 1 - 4; ROE plus ROI calculation
ROI ...
Yes. It is more holistic and NOT so measure and reward/punish
Allowing autonomy to be the guiding principle towards innovative brand changes.
Draw a connection between leaders and the behavior of their direct reports. Must set the pace for the managers to
Using a 360 tool, leaders are re-assessed approximately 14 months after the first assessment and results are comp
Promotion rate up through the pipeline after attending programs.
None
Hold attendees accountable to proving how they are applying the concepts into their day-to-day activities
Gain feedback from our C suite executives based on their observations of the participants.
Annual engagement surveys, progress/completion rates, standard business metrics.
n/a
Linking results back to behavior is critical and also difficult. Quantifiable and measurable are not the same.
Follow up mentor / mentee feedback sessions.
we measure culture change through monthly engagement surveys
Our leadership program centers around 4 core leadership competencies and the performance evaluation mirrors th
Currently are not doing but is a key strategy for 2019 and beyond
Graduation speeches use specific examples of development and performance improvement. The speeches include
By results
No leadership development program in place. All personal education
We have developed a quarterly review for technicians to complete, which will provide us with feedback on the perfo
measure promotions and tenure of those who completed leadership development program.
Active learning contributions to business. Informal feedback by participants and people who work with them. Have s
Assessment is something we are failing at.
Annual talent management and succession planning conversations reviewing those in formal leadership roles, as w
Three touch points: Immediately after for satisfaction with course, @60 days on implementation of what they learne
We conduct a judgment assessment at the beginning of the leadership development effort, debrief with each partici
Engagement scores
Informal surveys to capture qualitative feedback of participants' managers on behaviors before and after the progra
Assess leadership impact via annual employee engagment and specific quesitons that align to our leadership comp
Measure onboarding effectiveness of new hires
How many tickets the helpdesk receives.
We evaluate individual's national reputation in the subject-matter field; we look at profitability; staff retention; and re
My greatest challenge is getting management buy-in. From my experience with training, managers always highly d
Each session has an action for the leader to perform when they return to their station that's relevant to the subject d
The training team would use all of the above evaluation techniques almost always if we were given the authority to
civil rights complaints, corrective and disciplinary actions issued and the trend over time.
Some participants in the company's leadership program may be emerging leaders, so they do not have direct repor
N/a
We're in government so it's a bit different than a business and what we can and cannot do in terms of performance
promotion, ability and willingness to take on challenging projects, seeking continued learning
Formal and informal post-training interviews of participants by leaders to gauge implementation
We are just implementing our Leadership Program - measurements on business impact are still being evaluated
it solely lies on the opinion of top leadership, whether someone is gaining additional skill.
We have just begun to implement a leadership development program, so activities in the above areas are just begin
We just launched an Emerging Leadership Program and I designed it to assess progress throughout a 9 month pro
Frequently Almost Always Total
33.40% 175 47.90% 251 524
39.81% 207 13.08% 68 520
29.98% 155 11.22% 58 517
26.49% 138 8.06% 42 521
21.19% 110 9.44% 49 519
23.89% 124 11.37% 59 519
56
Answered 525
Skipped 195
tion) that THEY want to drive their own behavior. Hold weekly TOOT's to track "What's going well" and how was the Creative P
the pace for the managers to influence their teams.
sessment and results are compared to the initial feedback report.
day-to-day activities
vement. The speeches include commitments for each leader to their teams, their managers and the organisation.
ple who work with them. Have success measures, but those measures have been strongly affected by other elements and aren
n formal leadership roles, as well as High Potential and High Professional associates.
ementation of what they learned, @ 90 days to determine training experience ROI
effort, debrief with each participant, and set a goal to improve a weakness or take advantage of a strength identified in the ass
ors before and after the program. We monitor internal hiring rates and internal hiring of participants.
at align to our leadership competncies.
fitability; staff retention; and repeat and add-on business as signs that our leaders are doing a good job
ing, managers always highly demand training, but see little value in training. For three years I have been on the front lines of th
n that's relevant to the subject discussed. We look at effectiveness based upon completion of that action and the impact it has o
we were given the authority to do so.
o they do not have direct reports as of yet. Leadership succession is part of the program.
e been on the front lines of this battle. Only one manager actually experienced the value of my training, and then left the compa
action and the impact it has on the department.
, and include interviewing their managers to see how they are progressing. It's too new to discuss results but the effort to evalu
tps://vimeo.com/138751875
g, and then left the company two weeks later. The irony!
sults but the effort to evaluate progressively is new to this organization. Also, my HR manager tells me to run the entire leaders
e to run the entire leadership program and then takes over when leadership development involves supervisors and senior lead
pervisors and senior leadership. I am expected to evaluate the full program but not privy to all. I'm working to influence chang
working to influence change in this direction.
Leadership Development Survey 2019
How effective has your investment in leadership development been at improving performance at e
Not Effective
Somewhat Ineffective
C-level, VP, Managing Director level, and above 13.14% 11.37%
Middle Manager and Director level 5.69% 8.43%
Supervisory level 4.71% 7.84%
Employees with significant influence but who do not manage direct r 8.73% 10.52%
Employees designated as "high potential" 9.11% 7.52%
mproving performance at each level of leadership?
Marginally EffectiveEffective Highly Effective Total Weighted Average
35.49% 32.75% 7.25% 510 3.1
31.37% 42.35% 12.16% 510 3.47
26.47% 42.75% 18.24% 510 3.62
28.37% 41.27% 11.11% 504 3.36
26.14% 40.20% 17.03% 505 3.49
Answered 517
Skipped 203
Leadership Development Survey 2019
Approximately what percentage of your training budget is spent on leadership development?
Answered 442
Graph
Skipped
5: Percent of budget for
278
leadership development
% of40%
budget 2017 2018 2019
0-10% 37.7% 32.9% 37%
35%
11-20% 19.1% 19.0% 17%
21-30%
30% 13.2% 15.8% 18%
31-40% 7.7% 7.2% 5%
25%
41-60% 14.6% 12.4% 15%
20%
60-100% 7.7% 12.7% 10%
answered question
15%
skipped question 188 188
10%
5%
RespondentsResponse Date
0% 1 Feb 11 2019 1 20
0-10% 11-20% 21-30% 31-40% 41-60% 60-100%
2 Feb 11 2019 0 3
3 Feb 10 2019 0 30 2017 2018 2019
4 Feb 08 2019 1 50
5 Feb 07 2019 0 100
6 Feb 07 2019 1 10
7 Feb 07 2019 0 30
8 Feb 07 2019 0 25
9 Feb 06 2019 0 15
10 Feb 06 2019 0 100
11 Feb 06 2019 0 25
12 Feb 06 2019 0 15
13 Feb 06 2019 1 10
14 Feb 05 2019 0 20
15 Feb 05 2019 0 5
16 Feb 05 2019 0 20
17 Feb 05 2019 0 1
18 Feb 05 2019 0 20
19 Feb 05 2019 1 1
20 Feb 05 2019 1 30
21 Feb 05 2019 1 15
22 Feb 05 2019 0 25
23 Feb 05 2019 0 80
24 Feb 05 2019 0 15
25 Feb 05 2019 0 20
26 Feb 05 2019 0 10
27 Feb 05 2019 0 25
28 Feb 05 2019 0 10
29 Feb 05 2019 1 5
30 Feb 04 2019 0 100
31 Feb 04 2019 0 100
32 Feb 04 2019 0 50
33 Feb 04 2019 0 5
34 Feb 04 2019 0 4
35 Feb 04 2019 0 10
36 Feb 04 2019 0 50
37 Feb 04 2019 0 70
38 Feb 04 2019 0 15
39 Feb 04 2019 0 25
40 Feb 04 2019 0 60
41 Feb 04 2019 0 5
42 Feb 04 2019 0 33
43 Feb 04 2019 0 50
44 Feb 04 2019 0 10
45 Feb 04 2019 0 25
46 Feb 04 2019 0 25
47 Feb 04 2019 0 100
48 Feb 04 2019 0 20
49 Feb 04 2019 0 10
50 Feb 04 2019 0 10
51 Feb 04 2019 0 2
52 Feb 04 2019 0 50
53 Feb 04 2019 0 60
54 Feb 04 2019 0 30
55 Feb 04 2019 0 2
56 Feb 04 2019 0 80
57 Feb 04 2019 0 30
58 Feb 04 2019 0 0
59 Feb 04 2019 0 5
60 Feb 04 2019 1 25
61 Feb 04 2019 1 5
62 Feb 04 2019 1 10
63 Feb 04 2019 1 20
64 Feb 04 2019 1 40
65 Feb 04 2019 1 20
66 Feb 04 2019 1 30
67 Feb 04 2019 1 20
68 Feb 04 2019 1 5
69 Feb 04 2019 1 0
70 Feb 04 2019 1 10
71 Feb 04 2019 1 80
72 Feb 04 2019 1 100
73 Feb 04 2019 1 2
74 Feb 04 2019 1 10
75 Feb 04 2019 1 80
76 Feb 04 2019 1 50
77 Feb 04 2019 1 20
78 Feb 04 2019 1 5
79 Feb 04 2019 1 20
80 Feb 04 2019 1 3
81 Feb 04 2019 1 20
82 Feb 04 2019 1 30
83 Feb 04 2019 1 23
84 Feb 04 2019 1 25
85 Feb 04 2019 1 0
86 Feb 04 2019 1 25
87 Feb 04 2019 1 5
88 Feb 04 2019 1 20
89 Feb 04 2019 1 20
90 Feb 04 2019 1 85
91 Feb 04 2019 1 30
92 Feb 04 2019 1 0
93 Feb 04 2019 1 65
94 Feb 04 2019 1 20
95 Feb 04 2019 1 40
96 Feb 04 2019 1 50
97 Feb 04 2019 1 50
98 Feb 04 2019 1 50
99 Feb 04 2019 1 10
100 Feb 04 2019 1 25
101 Feb 04 2019 1 10
102 Feb 04 2019 0 10
103 Feb 01 2019 0 10
104 Jan 31 2019 0 25
105 Jan 30 2019 0 30
106 Jan 29 2019 0 2
107 Jan 29 2019 0 60
108 Jan 29 2019 1 35
109 Jan 29 2019 0 10
110 Jan 28 2019 0 40
111 Jan 28 2019 0 60
112 Jan 28 2019 1 33
113 Jan 28 2019 0 50
114 Jan 28 2019 0 0
115 Jan 27 2019 0 10
116 Jan 26 2019 0 3
117 Jan 25 2019 1 25
118 Jan 25 2019 0 15
119 Jan 24 2019 0 15
120 Jan 24 2019 0 60
121 Jan 24 2019 1 10
122 Jan 24 2019 1 25
123 Jan 24 2019 1 10
124 Jan 24 2019 1 25
125 Jan 24 2019 1 25
126 Jan 24 2019 1 15
127 Jan 24 2019 0 90
128 Jan 24 2019 0 40
129 Jan 24 2019 0 10
130 Jan 24 2019 0 50
131 Jan 23 2019 0 100
132 Jan 23 2019 0 50
133 Jan 23 2019 0 5
134 Jan 23 2019 0 40
135 Jan 23 2019 0 0
136 Jan 23 2019 0 30
137 Jan 23 2019 0 20
138 Jan 23 2019 1 50
139 Jan 23 2019 1 0
140 Jan 23 2019 1 20
141 Jan 23 2019 1 50
142 Jan 23 2019 1 25
143 Jan 23 2019 0 10
144 Jan 23 2019 0 25
145 Jan 23 2019 0 5
146 Jan 23 2019 0 20
147 Jan 23 2019 0 2
148 Jan 23 2019 0 20
149 Jan 23 2019 0 5
150 Jan 23 2019 0 20
151 Jan 22 2019 1 30
152 Jan 22 2019 0 30
153 Jan 22 2019 0 30
154 Jan 22 2019 0 10
155 Jan 22 2019 0 20
156 Jan 22 2019 0 30
157 Jan 22 2019 0 80
158 Jan 22 2019 0 40
159 Jan 22 2019 0 15
160 Jan 22 2019 0 25
161 Jan 22 2019 0 33
162 Jan 22 2019 0 10
163 Jan 22 2019 0 10
164 Jan 22 2019 0 10
165 Jan 22 2019 0 20
166 Jan 22 2019 0 70
167 Jan 22 2019 0 20
168 Jan 22 2019 0 35
169 Jan 22 2019 0 5
170 Jan 22 2019 0 0
171 Jan 22 2019 0 10
172 Jan 22 2019 0 10
173 Jan 22 2019 0 25
174 Jan 22 2019 0 10
175 Jan 22 2019 0 80
176 Jan 22 2019 0 15
177 Jan 22 2019 0 10
178 Jan 22 2019 0 25
179 Jan 22 2019 0 30
180 Jan 22 2019 0 60
181 Jan 22 2019 1 15
182 Jan 22 2019 1 70
183 Jan 22 2019 1 25
184 Jan 22 2019 1 50
185 Jan 22 2019 1 30
186 Jan 22 2019 1 10
187 Jan 22 2019 1 15
188 Jan 22 2019 1 25
189 Jan 22 2019 1 50
190 Jan 22 2019 1 0
191 Jan 22 2019 1 5
192 Jan 22 2019 1 15
193 Jan 22 2019 1 60
194 Jan 22 2019 1 85
195 Jan 22 2019 1 10
196 Jan 22 2019 1 10
197 Jan 22 2019 1 25
198 Jan 22 2019 1 90
199 Jan 22 2019 1 50
200 Jan 22 2019 1 50
201 Jan 22 2019 1 0
202 Jan 22 2019 1 30
203 Jan 22 2019 1 60
204 Jan 22 2019 1 5
205 Jan 22 2019 1 0
206 Jan 22 2019 1 20
207 Jan 22 2019 1 50
208 Jan 22 2019 1 20
209 Jan 22 2019 1 10
210 Jan 22 2019 1 2
211 Jan 22 2019 1 1
212 Jan 22 2019 1 10
213 Jan 22 2019 1 50
214 Jan 22 2019 1 5
215 Jan 22 2019 1 50
216 Jan 22 2019 1 20
217 Jan 22 2019 1 10
218 Jan 22 2019 1 10
219 Jan 22 2019 1 25
220 Jan 22 2019 1 15
221 Jan 22 2019 1 20
222 Jan 22 2019 1 25
223 Jan 22 2019 1 25
224 Jan 22 2019 1 25
225 Jan 22 2019 1 0
226 Jan 22 2019 1 10
227 Jan 22 2019 1 5
228 Jan 22 2019 1 35
229 Jan 22 2019 1 10
230 Jan 22 2019 1 15
231 Jan 22 2019 1 5
232 Jan 22 2019 1 10
233 Jan 22 2019 1 60
234 Jan 22 2019 0 0
235 Jan 22 2019 0 25
236 Jan 21 2019 1 45
237 Jan 21 2019 1 20
238 Jan 21 2019 0 0
239 Jan 21 2019 0 50
240 Jan 21 2019 0 10
241 Jan 20 2019 0 35
242 Jan 20 2019 0 15
243 Jan 20 2019 1 10
244 Jan 18 2019 0 25
245 Jan 18 2019 0 45
246 Jan 18 2019 1 30
247 Jan 18 2019 1 60
248 Jan 18 2019 1 85
249 Jan 18 2019 0 10
250 Jan 18 2019 0 50
251 Jan 18 2019 0 10
252 Jan 18 2019 0 0
253 Jan 18 2019 0 30
254 Jan 18 2019 0 10
255 Jan 18 2019 0 1
256 Jan 18 2019 0 25
257 Jan 17 2019 1 80
258 Jan 17 2019 0 80
259 Jan 17 2019 0 10
260 Jan 17 2019 0 50
261 Jan 17 2019 0 50
262 Jan 17 2019 0 60
263 Jan 17 2019 0 25
264 Jan 17 2019 0 0
265 Jan 17 2019 0 50
266 Jan 17 2019 0 50
267 Jan 17 2019 0 80
268 Jan 17 2019 0 10
269 Jan 17 2019 0 70
270 Jan 17 2019 0 20
271 Jan 17 2019 0 75
272 Jan 17 2019 0 20
273 Jan 17 2019 1 5
274 Jan 17 2019 1 0
275 Jan 17 2019 1 15
276 Jan 17 2019 1 100
277 Jan 17 2019 1 20
278 Jan 17 2019 1 20
279 Jan 17 2019 1 2
280 Jan 17 2019 1 10
281 Jan 17 2019 1 30
282 Jan 17 2019 1 10
283 Jan 17 2019 1 27
284 Jan 17 2019 1 30
285 Jan 17 2019 1 10
286 Jan 17 2019 1 40
287 Jan 17 2019 1 25
288 Jan 17 2019 1 55
289 Jan 17 2019 1 50
290 Jan 17 2019 1 30
291 Jan 17 2019 1 30
292 Jan 17 2019 1 2
293 Jan 17 2019 1 30
294 Jan 17 2019 1 30
295 Jan 17 2019 1 5
296 Jan 17 2019 1 25
297 Jan 17 2019 1 20
298 Jan 17 2019 1 5
299 Jan 17 2019 1 50
300 Jan 17 2019 1 50
301 Jan 17 2019 1 50
302 Jan 17 2019 1 70
303 Jan 17 2019 1 40
304 Jan 17 2019 1 75
305 Jan 17 2019 1 2
306 Jan 17 2019 1 10
307 Jan 17 2019 1 20
308 Jan 17 2019 1 25
309 Jan 17 2019 1 10
310 Jan 17 2019 1 10
311 Jan 17 2019 1 10
312 Jan 17 2019 1 75
313 Jan 17 2019 1 25
314 Jan 17 2019 1 20
315 Jan 17 2019 1 70
316 Jan 17 2019 1 10
317 Jan 17 2019 1 1
318 Jan 17 2019 1 15
319 Jan 16 2019 0 50
320 Jan 16 2019 0 40
321 Jan 16 2019 1 0
322 Jan 15 2019 0 0
323 Jan 15 2019 0 15
324 Jan 15 2019 0 30
325 Jan 15 2019 0 0
326 Jan 15 2019 0 50
327 Jan 15 2019 0 0
328 Jan 15 2019 0 25
329 Jan 15 2019 0 20
330 Jan 15 2019 0 10
331 Jan 15 2019 0 50
332 Jan 14 2019 1 1
333 Jan 14 2019 0 25
334 Jan 14 2019 1 40
335 Jan 14 2019 0 10
336 Jan 14 2019 0 50
337 Jan 14 2019 0 2
338 Jan 11 2019 0 10
339 Jan 11 2019 0 50
340 Jan 11 2019 1 10
341 Jan 11 2019 1 30
342 Jan 11 2019 1 10
343 Jan 11 2019 1 5
344 Jan 11 2019 0 20
345 Jan 11 2019 0 0
346 Jan 11 2019 0 30
347 Jan 11 2019 0 20
348 Jan 11 2019 0 50
349 Jan 11 2019 0 10
350 Jan 10 2019 1 15
351 Jan 10 2019 1 10
352 Jan 10 2019 0 5
353 Jan 10 2019 0 15
354 Jan 10 2019 0 30
355 Jan 10 2019 0 20
356 Jan 10 2019 0 30
357 Jan 10 2019 0 30
358 Jan 10 2019 0 60
359 Jan 10 2019 0 25
360 Jan 10 2019 0 70
361 Jan 10 2019 0 11
362 Jan 10 2019 0 40
363 Jan 10 2019 0 3
364 Jan 10 2019 0 5
365 Jan 10 2019 0 0
366 Jan 10 2019 1 4
367 Jan 10 2019 1 10
368 Jan 10 2019 1 0
369 Jan 10 2019 1 80
370 Jan 10 2019 1 20
371 Jan 10 2019 1 45
372 Jan 10 2019 1 10
373 Jan 10 2019 1 20
374 Jan 10 2019 1 10
375 Jan 10 2019 1 20
376 Jan 10 2019 1 10
377 Jan 10 2019 1 60
378 Jan 10 2019 1 10
379 Jan 10 2019 1 65
380 Jan 10 2019 1 20
381 Jan 10 2019 1 40
382 Jan 10 2019 1 25
383 Jan 10 2019 0 0
384 Jan 10 2019 0 10
385 Jan 10 2019 0 20
386 Jan 10 2019 0 20
387 Jan 10 2019 0 25
388 Jan 10 2019 0 0
389 Jan 10 2019 0 20
390 Jan 10 2019 0 45
391 Jan 10 2019 0 15
392 Jan 10 2019 0 75
393 Jan 10 2019 0 10
394 Jan 10 2019 0 1
395 Jan 10 2019 0 0
396 Jan 10 2019 0 10
397 Jan 10 2019 0 25
398 Jan 10 2019 0 30
399 Jan 10 2019 0 80
400 Jan 10 2019 0 10
401 Jan 10 2019 0 40
402 Jan 10 2019 0 10
403 Jan 10 2019 0 10
404 Jan 10 2019 0 25
405 Jan 10 2019 0 75
406 Jan 10 2019 0 0
407 Jan 10 2019 0 15
408 Jan 10 2019 0 35
409 Jan 10 2019 0 60
410 Jan 10 2019 0 5
411 Jan 10 2019 0 10
412 Jan 10 2019 0 5
413 Jan 10 2019 0 10
414 Jan 10 2019 0 75
415 Jan 10 2019 0 15
416 Jan 10 2019 0 70
417 Jan 10 2019 0 60
418 Jan 10 2019 0 5
419 Jan 10 2019 0 40
420 Jan 10 2019 0 50
421 Jan 10 2019 0 20
422 Jan 10 2019 0 10
423 Jan 10 2019 0 15
424 Jan 09 2019 0 60
425 Jan 09 2019 0 70
426 Jan 09 2019 0 20
427 Jan 09 2019 1 45
428 Jan 09 2019 0 50
429 Jan 08 2019 0 50
430 Jan 08 2019 0 30
431 Jan 08 2019 0 10
432 Jan 08 2019 0 20
433 Jan 08 2019 1 0
434 Jan 08 2019 1 45
435 Jan 08 2019 1 50
436 Jan 08 2019 1 4
437 Jan 08 2019 1 0
438 Jan 08 2019 0 15
439 Jan 08 2019 0 10
440 Jan 08 2019 0 10
441 Jan 08 2019 0 20
442 Jan 08 2019 0 20
27
ership development?
60-100%
Leadership Development Survey 2019
Approximately what percentage of your leadership development expenditures are spent on each o
Answer Choices Average Number
C-level/VP/Managing Director level and above 18.3807339449541
Middle Manager and Director level 24.6141906873614
Supervisory level 23.4966592427617
Employees with a significant degree of influence but who do not mana 12.537170263789
Employees designated as “high potential” 13.4644549763033
All others in the organization 14.5725388601036
C-level/VP/Managing Director level and above Tags Middle Manager and Director level
25 25
40 30
5 5
20 50
20 15
10 25
10 10
5 20
25 30
30 20
20 20
20 20
0 85
0 50
20 20
0 20
25 15
20 20
10 15
20 20
25 25
20 20
10 20
0 25
10 30
5 15
15 15
50 10
5 5
25 25
50 20
10 10
30 20
0 0
25 25
40 20
50 25
20 30
50 20
3 7
0 15
20 30
9 04:00 PM
10 40
15 20
15 40
5 80
20 30
20 40
0 25
10 20
5 70
9 02:50 PM 50
40 30
0 25
0 15
10 40
5 20
10 10
5 40
30 25
1 5
30 30
30 30
5 10
5 80
10 10
5 25
0 5
30 30
50 20
15 10
20 20
10 30
10 30
0 40
5 5
10 10
20 20
60 20
10 20
10 40
9 12:26 PM
25 25
50 25
10 40
30 10
10 20
10 10
10 20
5 25
80 15
10 20
8 20
5 75
0 25
10 20
10 15
5 5
10 20
34 33
5 30
0 0
10 50
0 30
20 10
10 30
70 5
5 40
25 25
0 0
9 11:56 AM 20
30 10
20 20
20 10
0 25
50 30
50
0 25
20 20
10 15
10 20
10 10
10 20
20 25
70 20
50 20
10 80
0 35
15 35
0 30
15 20
10 25
25 50
20 20
15 50
15 33
0 10
10 30
0 5
50 15
15 20
10 75
10 20
0 90
20 25
0 10
5 25
5 20
20 20
30 40
5 25
15 50
30
0 0
20 40
20 10
70 15
10 1
30 30
50 25
40 40
15 20
40 10
50
20 30
10 50
20 25
10 20
75 15
10 20
10 20
20 20
10 20
10 10
1 59
12 5
0 0
35 25
5 10
20 50
0 0
50 10
10 40
10 10
10 10
40
20 10
30 20
20 47
10 10
5 15
10 60
30 20
15 20
50 10
2 10
25 25
20 20
5 20
5 10
50 25
20 30
10 25
0 10
10 30
10 20
20 20
25 25
25 20
5 20
0 0
5 10
0 0
20 40
10 10
0 0
50 20
80
20 20
25 30
80 15
50 30
5 20
80 10
40
10 20
10
5 90
25 5
15 15
0 30
5 20
50 20
10 20
80 20
20 70
10 40
30 20
25 55
90
5 35
60
5 75
20 25
0 20
0 10
30 30
10 20
50 25
0 10
80 10
30 40
20 40
50 20
40 50
10 10
20 20
0 10
10 30
10 20
10 20
0 30
10 20
5 10
35 35
25 25
20 50
20 20
50 10
10 40
10 20
20 20
10 10
20
10
20 20
40 20
25 20
0 0
10 30
10 30
0 10
20 20
0 10
5 15
0 0
50 25
0 75
5 25
5 30
30 20
15 25
15 15
0 20
0 5
10 25
10 20
20 20
15 25
5 50
1 34
40 20
0 30
30 10
10 40
30 20
5 20
20 30
20 20
30 20
80 12
15 45
20 20
40 40
15 15
50 10
0 50
5 10
20 20
5 20
10 10
20 10
70 10
5 80
25 25
25 20
10 20
20 30
5 65
5 45
0 10
5 15
0 50
10 25
5 10
100 0
0 30
100
10 10
5 30
40 30
20
10 85
50 50
0 10
10
10 25
10 10
5 25
15 15
0 75
25 20
5 10
0 0
10
25 20
5 40
0 0
10 10
2 10
25 20
20 20
15 25
5 40
15 10
10 40
45 15
5 20
5 20
10 10
10 10
15 80
5 20
0 0
40
20
20 10
10
10 10
20
10 15
10 30
10 50
30 30
16 16
10 10
0 30
20 40
10 35
10 20
10 60
0 40
20 60
40 25
20 20
40 5
10 10
70 10
20 15
75
10 15
30
16 16
50 30
99 0
10 10
0 0
15 25
5 20
5 45
50 25
40 20
40 40
20 30
100 0
5 25
50 25
100 0
10 40
5 20
10 30
20 20
5 0
10 30
5 5
10 20
60 25
10 10
15 15
0 15
20 10
20 20
10 10
10 30
10 50
20 35
15 15
50 30
10 40
10 25
0 50
2 30
2 63
10 10
10 10
10 20
0 0
0 25
25 30
10 10
70 20
5 60
5 25
10 50
50 10
25 10
2017 2018 2019
33% 20% 18%
37% 27% 25%
40% 27% 23%
12% 13%
14% 13%
15% 15%
Tags Employees
Supervisory
withlevel
a significant
Tagsdegree of influence but whoTags
do not manage direct reports
20 15
10
50 30
20 5
15 0
25 0
10 20
30 5
20
10 10
20 20
20 15
0 0
50
20 20
30 20
10 15
20 20
20 15
20 20
10 5
20 15
20 20
30 0
30 10
40 20
10 35
10 0
5 5
30
5 5
50 10
10 20
20 35
25
20 10
30 5
15 10
65 15
50 5
10 10
15
30 10
10 35
10 15
5 0
30 10
10 10
25 20
20 20
5 5
50
5 5
25 25
50 13
30 15
25 15
10 20
20 5
15 15
4 40
30 10
20 10
50 10
10 0
20 20
25 20
20 50
20 10
10 10
20 10
20 0
30 10
40 5
10 20
5 5
10 10
20
10 5
20 10
20 20
50 50
25 5
15
10 10
10 10
70 0
10 10
40 5
40
2 2
30 20
30 8
5 5
25 25
30 20
60 5
15 15
20 15
33 0
45 10
40 0
10 10
10 10
30 30
10 10
2 2
15 20
25 10
20 20
80
10 25
20 20
10 10
25 5
10 5
50
25 10
15 15
30 10
20 5
10 10
10 10
15 20
10 0
20 5
10 0
50 15
20 10
25 25
60 5
25 15
0 0
30 10
75
10 10
33 0
30 20
15 15
20 30
10 10
20 15
10
20 15
0 0
25 20
70 10
50 5
20 10
20 10
20 5
50 10
25 3
60 5
0 100
30 5
10 20
10 2
18 1
20 5
25 0
10 10
20 0
50
20 10
10 10
25 10
40 10
5 3
10
20 20
30 20
30 15
30 15
30 5
5 10
25 0
25 10
50 20
20 0
0 0
15 5
40 10
40 10
25 20
40 20
20 10
20 15
33
10 10
20 50
30
15 15
20 10
10 5
16 10
0 25
15 15
10 10
15 20
10 0
5 5
25 10
30 10
30 5
20 20
30 15
25 10
5 5
15 10
0 0
25 20
15 40
15 5
30 20
0 0
10 10
10
20 20
10
25 15
5
20
20 20
10 0
50 0
5
5 15
15 15
30 20
30 20
10 5
20 20
10 0
30 10
20 5
10 5
5
35 5
30
10 0
25 5
80 0
10 70
15 15
15 15
10 10
60 10
10 0
15 5
30 5
10 5
5 5
10 50
10 10
80 10
30 5
20 30
40 10
30 20
20 20
30 30
30
20 5
20 15
10 20
20 0
20 20
20 20
15 50
40 10
20 20
20 10
20
10 10
0 3
30
10 10
60 0
20 20
25 25
25 20
0 0
15 10
25 0
35 10
30 5
50
20 10
15 15
30 35
40 25
25 10
30 30
30 10
25 15
20 5
25
20 10
10 10
10 10
10 0
30 10
50 15
10 0
30 10
50 0
5 2
40
20 20
0 10
15 20
10 10
50 0
20 25
15 15
20 20
80 0
10 10
5 5
10
15 10
20 15
95 5
30 5
30 5
20 5
30 10
55 15
25 25
0 50
50 25
35 15
55 15
0 0
50 10
10 30
45 10
20 10
60 10
5 0
0 0
20 5
10 30
25 10
10 20
25 10
15 25
25 0
15 15
20 15
0 0
30 30
5 10
30 5
50 20
40 10
10 30
30 5
20 20
35 10
30
30 20
20 10
5 10
10 5
45 10
50 15
30 10
5
25 20
100 0
30 10
40 10
20
30 30
10 10
40 20
20 20
30 10
20 10
17 17
50 10
25 25
20 10
35 5
20 20
10 10
10 5
20 0
15 5
20 15
5
20 20
10 5
50 5
25
20 20
60 10
17 17
20 0
0 0
20 15
0 0
20 15
20 20
15 15
25 0
10 0
20
30
0 0
40 10
0 0
0 0
20 10
50 10
10 10
20 10
5 85
50 0
30 10
50 10
5 0
50 10
10 25
60 10
50
40 10
20 20
70 5
30 10
10 10
30 5
40 20
20 0
10 10
50 10
50 0
50 10
25
40 15
1 10
35 5
0 0
24 25
20 10
10 55
10
20 10
25 15
10 5
20 10
30 10
Employees designated as “high potential” Tags All others in the organization
15
15 5
10
5 0
0 50
30 10
30 20
30 10
20 5
20 10
20
20 5
15 0
10 10
10 20
20 15
10 10
30 10
10 10
25 10
15 10
20 10
25 20
5 15
10 10
25
30 0
5 75
20
20
10 10
10 10
35 10
25
10 0
25
5 10
5 0
10
30
10 20
85
10
10 10
10 10
10 0
10
10 10
20 10
30
5 10
5 15
25 0
12 10
5 0
15 20
40 10
10 20
10 5
45 5
10
0 25
5 0
20 20
25
0 25
10
10 0
5 40
40 0
10 10
15 0
30 0
5 75
10 50
40
5
30 10
10
15 5
10
20 10
0 40
0 0
10 50
10 15
25 5
1 0
10 10
30 4
5 5
15 10
10 10
10
25 35
25 10
0 0
5 5
40 20
10 10
40 10
5 5
20 20
0 21
10 10
10 5
20 40
25 0
20
10 40
5 40
5
10 30
20 10
5 30
5 40
10 50
50
10 10
0 0
3 2
0 0
0 0
10 10
10 10
0 0
15 10
25 0
10 10
25
10 5
10 9
35 5
15 15
40 5
10 5
15 15
5
30 5
0 10
10
10 0
5 10
5 40
10 20
5 0
10
7 0
5
0 0
5 0
20 20
2 1
10 60
10 5
0 0
20
30 15
10 20
10 10
10 10
10 10
10 10
2 0
60
20 10
10 0
15 10
15 20
5 0
65 3
25 50
5 0
10 5
10 0
0 100
5 15
0 0
20 10
20 15
20 20
5 10
10 50
10 0
10 10
5 30
25 0
36 26
25 0
15 15
20 35
45 5
0 15
15 25
10 20
50
10 15
20 10
15
5 10
25 20
10 40
0 100
20 20
40 5
5 15
10 20
0 100
10 0
10
20 0
90
5 0
20 15
0 0
60
10 10
10 80
35 15
10 30
20 0
25 0
10 5
20 10
0 0
10
20 5
5 0
5
20
10
10
15 10
0 0
5 5
0 10
5 35
0 5
10 10
0 0
10
5 0
10 5
0 0
10 10
10 30
0 0
5 20
10 10
10 10
10 10
20 10
20 5
25 25
5
15 10
10 0
10 20
20 10
20
5 10
30
50
10 20
20
30 5
7 90
30
35 5
0 30
20
20 20
25 10
0 100
0 0
20 5
30 0
20 10
15 25
10 5
0 30
10 20
0 10
10 10
10 10
10 10
40
5 5
10 40
20 20
0 40
5 5
10 0
40 0
10 10
0 0
1 0
10 10
0 10
15 20
10 10
0 0
30 10
15 15
20 15
0 0
10 40
5 5
5
10 15
10 10
5 30
5 10
5
5 5
15 5
20 10
0 0
13 12
15
10 5
0 0
5 5
20 20
10 0
0 0
10
0 0
0 0
40 25
40 10
10 20
20 30
15 20
20 10
0 0
10 15
15 35
0 100
25 5
30 10
10 10
30 0
20 10
30 18
10 10
20 0
15 0
20 5
20 5
20
20 5
20 40
5 15
15 0
10 30
20 10
0 0
20
30
10 40
30
20 40
20
25 10
10 10
10
40
17 17
5 15
20
10 0
10 5
20 10
5 5
40 5
0 0
10 5
15 10
50
20 20
5 0
5 5
10 25
17 17
0 0
0 1
15 30
0 100
5 20
30 5
15 5
0 0
30 0
20
0 0
10 10
25 0
0 0
10 10
10 5
20 20
20 10
5 0
10 0
0 50
10
5 5
10 10
25 10
15 0
20 30
20 0
20 0
5 0
10 10
20 0
5 5
10 0
0 0
20 10
5 0
0 0
5 3
5 5
15 10
10 59
25 5
0 100
14 12
10 5
5 10
0 0
5
25 5
20 5
10
0 25
Tags
Leadership Development Survey 2019
Going forward, how do you anticipate your investment in leadership development will change over
Answer Choices Responses 2017 2018 2019
Decrease significantly 1.73% 9 2.70% 1.52% 1.73%
Decrease slightly 4.80% 25 2.70% 5.30% 4.80%
Stay the same 38.00% 198 36.80% 37.88% 38.00%
Increase slightly 40.88% 213 44.40% 41.16% 40.88%
Increase significantly 14.59% 76 13.40% 14.14% 14.59%
Answered 521
Skipped 199
ment will change over the next 12 months?
Leadership Development Survey 2019
Indicate the degree to which you agree or disagree on the impact of your leadership development
Best-in-class leaders
edIn and Facebook as the same thing when they are not.
inappropriately.
m not sure whether you're talking about internal social media (like Workplace by Facebook) or external social media (like regula
ecific industry
n find info; I don't see it being used for networking but locating & comparing info
this should be a non issue. I have a personal rule, never friend a subordinate.
ter savvy, job role, etc.) are on social media more than other groups which creates a perception some groups get more attentio
learning activities
y is, this is how people connect and communicate now - its the new "watercooler" conversation...
tient information.
keep up with what is going on in the industry, trends, news, etc. that affects employees and the business.
loosing its significance . Now a days, no one takes social media messages seriously.
closely monitored.
t from the work being done. We find that banning cell phone use has been skirted by the use of smart watches.
nnections and networks.
e validity of information and the source. Misinformation can do damage quickly and can be costly and difficult to recover.
annot be representative of the organization. There are concerns about security of such an approach and it won't integrate with o
ing information.
ms "distracting"
ive programs using social media, and maintenance is always a concern. It is left up to individuals and no oversight built in, whe
al social media (like regular Facebook). For the former, I think the major issue is getting everyone to participate.
e groups get more attention or are more 'in-the-know.'
, but those of the likes of Facebook have not made the world a better place. Most people use Facebook like it's an encycloped
difficult to recover.
nd it won't integrate with our mandated LMS. 2/3 of our population does field-based, manual labor and is not computer/social m
d no oversight built in, whether using as a business communication tool or a learning tool.
ook like it's an encyclopedia. It's amazing to think that we have all this wonderful technology, but we still are living folklore times
ey are._x000D_
n email
argeted customer interactions with our designers. It is not something we utilize for employee engagement or communications.
just learning).
boundaries
HR we use it for recruiting and are trying to break down some old barriers that would allow us to use it more with current employ
uld be condemned as the Fraud, Waste and Abuse of corporate time it is.
es. We do use it for our representatives, but not employees.
kbenefits
on it, there
listeddon't use Iisjust
in Q18, succinctly.
had to rank them or the survey wouldn't let me proceed._x000D_
n. But again I was forced to put in an answer.
eholders, recruiting new employees who connect with existing employees. Letting our community service shine as well as reco
ement or communications. We have a very high paced, customer facing business where employees can't be distracted with dev
Overall, do the problems of social media outweigh the benefits, or do the benefits ouitweight the p
response Disagree Agree Agree Strongly
Problems outwei 15.00% 21.2 12.40% 31.2 51.19% 237 17.06%
Problems outweig 21.00% 11 37.15% 172 46.22% 214 14.25%
Equal 12.00% 6 13.67% 63 51.84% 239 33.19%
Benefits outwei 31.00% 1 4.56% 21 47.72% 220 47.51%
Benefits outwei 20.00% 54 22.73% 105 36.58% 169 29.00%
udies as a group, read and discuss "Leadership and Self-Deception," provide a clear path for promotion, hold leaders accounta
ng managers to inspiring leaders. Currently managers get no support from their directors, VPs, etc.
gram for several months. We are already observing their interaction and learning impact which is positive. We are also looking
er skills to be prepared for the next opportunity.
on, hold leaders accountable, communicate clear leadership expectations, assess leadership competencies (all of this would be
itive. We are also looking at integrating leadership into teaching, coaching and mentoring through participation or creating vide
encies (all of this would be effective IF WE WOULD JUST DO THEM)
2018 2019
181 194
Leadership Development Survey 2019
What best describes your job function?
Answer Choices Responses
Training management 36.19% 156
HR/Personnel management 6.73% 29
e-Learning/Learning management 3.48% 15
General/Corporate/Administrative management 5.10% 22
Finance/Operations management 1.16% 5
IT/MIS/Technical management 1.62% 7
Sales & Marketing management 2.32% 10
Education 4.18% 18
Instructional Designer/Developer 9.51% 41
Trainer/Instructor 14.62% 63
Consultant 9.74% 42
Other (please specify) 5.34% 23
Answered 431
Skipped 289
Specialist/Executive Coach
dian Company - govt agency)
Leadership Development Survey 2019
What is your job title?
Answer Choices Responses
President or above 5.12% 22
Vice President 6.51% 28
Director 21.63% 93
Manager 22.56% 97
Trainer 14.88% 64
Supervisor, Coordinator, Assistant, Specialist 13.95% 60
Other (please specify) 15.35% 66
Answered 430
Skipped 290
Tags
ons Officer 1
Development Specialist
ctional Designer
Development Specialist
evelopment Consultant
al Development Specialist
onal Designer and Media Devleoper
r/Asst Director in the School of Ministerial Training
opment specialist
al Development Consultant
Consultant and Coach
evelopment Lead
nerships Manager
Leadership Development Survey 2019
(Optional) To be entered into the drawing for an Amazon gift card and to receive a copy of the rese
Answer Choices Responses
Name 99.74% 381
Email 100.00% 382
Answered 382
Skipped 338
nvisionpartners.com
delaide.com.au
rproject.org
elman.com
energy.com
rtgage.com
nnati-oh.gov
ftware.com
ning.com.mx
trumhealth.org
elopment.com
tsgroup.com
merycollege.edu
clhealth.org
cemann.com
ectorslife.com
Leadership Development Survey 2019
Would you be willing to be contacted for a brief interview to explore leadership development issue
Answer Choices Responses
Yes 23.87% 100
No 76.13% 319
Answered 419
Skipped 301
adership development issues in more depth? (Your answer will have no impact on entry into the drawing.)
y into the drawing.)