Vector Control

Greater than 90%

FREQUENT Mitigate Fix Now! Avoid
Score: 5
50% to 90%
1.3, 3.3.1, 3.3.2
PROBABLE Lower Priority Mitigate
Fix Now!
Score: 4
10% to 50%
OCCASIONAL Lower Priority Lower Priority 2.3.1, 3.3.3 Mitigate
Score: 3
3% to 10%
REMOTE Lower Priority Lower Priority 2.3.2 Mitigate
Score: 2
0% to 3%
IMPROBABLE Lower Priority Lower Priority Lower Priority
Score:1
1 2 3

Negligible Marginal Important

Consequences in various areas
1. JO personnel inadequate 1.3 Results to
number due to long delay of sickness, absences
salary received and resignation
12
2. Resistance of airline 2.3.1 Possible entry
operators on the residue of vector mosquito
effect of aerosol
9
2.3.2 Vector-borne
disease transmission
6
3. Non-availability of 3.3.1 Non-conformity
equipments/tools and to the policy issued
supplies to implement
emergency response on
vector control 12

3.3.2 Lower trust and

confidence on the
part of stake holders
12

3.3.3 Non
compliance to the
core capacity
requirements at
POEs
9
 Avoid Avoid

1.4 Avoid Avoid

Fix Now! Avoid

2.4 Mitigate Fix Now!

Mitigate Mitigate

4 5

Critical Catastrophic
areas TOTAL
1.4 Increase working
hours without
compensation 28
16
2.4 Non-compliance
to IHR at POEs
8
23

33
 Screening of crew and passenger during pandemic
Greater than 90%
FREQUENT Mitigate Fix Now! Avoid
Score: 5
50% to 90%
1.3, 3.3.1, 3.3.2
PROBABLE Lower Priority Mitigate
Fix Now!
Score: 4
10% to 50%
OCCASIONAL Lower Priority Lower Priority 2.3.1, 3.3.3 Mitigate
Score: 3
3% to 10%
REMOTE Lower Priority Lower Priority 2.3.2 Mitigate
Score: 2
0% to 3%
3.1 2.3, 3.3
IMPROBABLE Lower Priority
Lower Priority
Lower Priority
Score:1
1 2 3

Negligible Marginal Important

Consequences in various areas
1. Creeping surveillance 1.2.1 Draining MOOE
system for emerging diseases

6
1.2.2 Increase in
number of
emergency
procurement

6
1.2.3 increase in
request for sub-
allotment of fund
6
2. Lapses in defining standard 2.3 Crash course
for facility, equipment, training for JO =
human resource requirement hampered infection
for a major & a sub-station control program =
disease

3. Non-availability of unique 3.1 Manual screening 3.2 increase in

equipment locally process operational expenses

1 3
pandemic

Avoid Avoid

1.4 Avoid Avoid

1.4.2, 1.4.3 Avoid

Fix Now!

1.4.4, 1.4.5 Fix Now!

Mitigate

1.4.1, 2.4.1, 2.4.2, 2.5.1, 2.5.2, 3.5.1,

3.4 3.5.2
Mitigate Mitigate

4 5

Critical Catastrophic
areas TOTAL
1.4.1 Lapses in public
health

4
1.4.2 Delay in salary
of job order positions

12
1.4.3 Resignation of
job order result to 62
inefficient screening
12
1.4.4 Cases detected
in community

8
1.4.5 Overwhelmed
dedicated hospital
and holding facility
8
2.4.1 Budget for 2.5.1 Queuing of
other services passenger hampered
reduced

4 5 21
2.4.2 Increase 2.5.2 Dissatisfied
request for job order travelers and aircraft
positions operator = reduced
tourism

4 5
3.4 Lapses in 3.5.1 Reduced
screening measures tourism, reduced
trade
4 5
18

3.5.2 Negative image

of the country
5
 Inspection of conveyances
Greater than 90%
FREQUENT Mitigate Fix Now! Avoid
Score: 5
50% to 90%
1.3.1, 1.3.2
PROBABLE Lower Priority Mitigate
Fix Now!
Score: 4
10% to 50%
OCCASIONAL Lower Priority Lower Priority 3.3.1, 3.3.2 Mitigate
Score: 3
3% to 10%
REMOTE Lower Priority Lower Priority 2.3, 4.3 Mitigate
Score: 2
0% to 3%
IMPROBABLE Lower Priority 4.2 Lower Priority Lower Priority
Score:1
1 2 3

Negligible Marginal Important

Consequences in various areas
1. DBM disapproval of 1.3.1Multitasking
requested plantilla position personnel

12
1.3.2 Decreased
revenue collection

12
2. Frequent resignation of 2.3 Inadequate BOQ
trained personnel services

3. Delay in procurement 3.3.1 Low income

process for core capacity generation
compliant facility

9
process for core capacity
compliant facility

3.3.2 Decrease in
provision of services
to stake holders

9
4. Opening of new ports 4.2 Unintended 4.3 Lack of trained
without pre-consultation budget for staffing personnel
with BOQ and facility
acquisition

2 6
 Avoid Avoid

1.4.2, 2.4.2 Avoid Avoid

1.4.1, 3.4.2 Avoid

Fix Now!

2.4.1, 3.4.1 Fix Now!

Mitigate

Mitigate Mitigate

4 5

Critical Catastrophic
areas TOTAL
1.4.1 Inadequate
Manpower

12
52
1.4.2 Decreased
productivity among
BOQ personnel
16
2.4.1 Vulnerability to
emerging/ re-
emerging diseases
8 30
2.4.2 Lack of
personnel
16
3.4.1 Non-utilization
of funds resulting to
low succeeding
budget allocation

8 38
 38
3.4.2 Incompetent
ports as per IHR
standard

12

10
 Food safety
Greater than 90%
FREQUENT Mitigate Fix Now! Avoid
Score: 5
50% to 90%
2.2 1.3, 2.3.1, 3.3.1
PROBABLE Lower Priority
Mitigate Fix Now!
Score: 4
10% to 50%
3.2 2.3.2, 3.3.2
OCCASIONAL Lower Priority
Lower Priority Mitigate
Score: 3
3% to 10%
3.1
REMOTE Lower Priority
Lower Priority Mitigate
Score: 2
0% to 3%
1.2
IMPROBABLE Lower Priority
Lower Priority
Lower Priority
Score:1
1 2 3

Negligible Marginal Important

Consequences in various areas
1. Frequency of training 1.2 Exceeding 1.3 Poor practices of
number of food handlers
participants to ideal
limit

2 12

2. Overlapping of function 2.3.1 Promotes red

between BOQ & LGU tape
2.2 Increase cost on
the part of client that
resort to
delay/neglect
compliance of BOQ
requirements
8 12

2.3.2 Low income

generation for BOQ

9
3. Wide area of coverage 3.1 Decrease PBB 3.2 Under utilization 3.3.1 Low compliance
over few stations to cover of investment for to food safety law
domestic ports equipment

2 6 12
over few stations to cover
domestic ports

3.3.2 Low income

generation
9
 Avoid Avoid

1.4.1, 2.4
Avoid
Avoid

3.4
Avoid
Fix Now!

1.4.2
Fix Now!
Mitigate

3.5
Mitigate
Mitigate

4 5

Critical Catastrophic
areas TOTAL
1.4.1 Bad reputation
for FSE operators

16 38
1.4.2 increase cases
of food bornew
disease
8
2.4 Low income/
closure of business

45
16

3.4 Increase cases of 3.5 Death of

food borne disease pax/terminal user

46
12 5
46