BACKGROUND

Recruitment & Promotion are corrupt by NGOs:

Some NGO exercises are expanded to the contributors to bring cash for tending to
issues that are really counterfeit. Workers just as experts are enlisted by the
uneven decision of the CEO. Thus, enrollment and advancement are found to
happen on the premise of relativism and individual relationship with the
individual who stands firm on the most senior foothold like boss leader. Choice
interaction frequently happens through needs straightforwardness and the choice
happens to select a preselected applicant by choice board. Besides, enlistment is
frequently affected by proposals from the benefactor, legislators, government
authorities, or other compelling people. In many cases retired government
officials are employed, who allegedly use their connections for undue advantage.
In Government Projects Perversion through NGOs
The government maintains a specific procedure to select NGOs but it is violated
through corruption. Request for project proposals is published in daily
newspapers with poor circulation. Even after corruption or irregularities are
identified in government projects, donors usually do not take sufficiently strong
position to avoid confrontation with the government. Sometimes high officials of
the government form NGOs in the name of relatives, and facilitate allocation of
project fund.
Avoiding Tax by NGO Officials
Numerous NGO high authorities maintain a strategic distance from paying taxby
showing that their fundamental compensation is less and different offices are very
high. The CEO regularly takes pay from numerous undertakings however that
doesn't reflect it in the accounts.
Secrecy of Information provide in NGO
NGOs are often unwilling to disclose information especially those on finance and
human resource management.
Exaggerated Evaluation of the Programs
Inefficient consultants are appointed to evaluate the projects so that the real
picture is not exposed. Achievements are often harmful in the project evaluation
report and it has been showed that the expected change of the outcome of the
programs. Many times, journalists are influenced to publish reports which can
create obstacle on the success of the NGO.
Organization Exclusion Occur Internally
we have seen that representatives are not enlisted as indicated by the venture
proposition. One representative, regardless of whether she/he works for various
undertakings, gets compensation from one venture while compensation drawn
against her/his from every single such undertaking. All things considered the CEO
can go through cash from the basic asset on his/her choice. There is segregation
with respect to compensations of the great, medium, and low-level staff and it
very well may be said one sort of inside defilement. Properties, for example,
vehicle, PC, and furniture purchased for the association are regularly utilized for
individual purposes which is an untrustworthy movement.
NGO’s classification in Bangladesh:
In the basis of certain factors such as, size, class, life span, location, status of
personals and characteristics of the beneficiaries, NGOs are divided into some
particular types. Here is given a brief description of the classifications of NGOs
such as Charity Oriented NGOs, Development Service Oriented NGOs,
Participatory NGOs, Empowerment Oriented NGOs, Local NGOs, International
NGOs, Mixed NGOs, National NGOs, etc.
JUSTIFICATION
PESTEL is a strategic analytical tool used to assess external factors affecting
businesses. PESTEL analysis provides an overall explanation of influences on the
business. It gives a bird’s eye view of the whole environment from many different
angles that one wants to check and keep a track of while contemplating a certain
idea/plan. And for this case study we are choosing to do PESTEL analysis as we are
not talking about just one NGO but an overall view NGOs.
Social
1.
UNION AGENDA
1. Employees as well as consultants are recruited according to the one-sided
choice of the chief executive.
2. promotion is found to take place on the basis of relativism and personal
relationship with the person who holds the most senior position like chief
executive.
3. recruitment is often influenced by recommendations from the donor,
politicians, government officials, or other influential persons.
4. employees are not recruited according to the project proposal. One
employee, even if she/he works for different projects, gets salary
from one project whereas salary drawn against her/his from all such
projects.
5. There is discrimination with regard to salaries of the high, medium, and
low-level staff.
6.