Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Radicalization
Student’s Name
Institution
RADICALIZATION
2
Radicalization
References
Radicalization, its root causes, and why a particular group of individuals opts to engage in
the vice pose pertinent questions for the authorities and the general populous. Whatever causes
several young individuals originating from diverse backgrounds to join violent groups thus
ending up as extremists begs for critical interrogation. Arguably, a myriad of factors compel a
sizable population of individuals living in the Diaspora to end up radicalized and ultimately
extremists.
Substantially, the Diaspora encloses groups of individuals residing in a foreign country while
still maintaining close ties with their homeland. This group does not include those individuals
leaving their country of origin for economic reasons only to return after terminating their
economic engagement. A myriad of factors can make a section of the Diaspora susceptible to
radicalization. In the first instance, a majority of migrants harbor a sense of insecurity among its
ranks. This feeling further amplifies itself, especially among labor migrants who ascertain
these migrants live in very challenging conditions, mainly due to the lack of appropriate
resources.
Consequently, to rescue such situations, the individuals’ device means to earn extra revenue
via a system that can also articulate their opinions audibly. These migrants mostly end up
RADICALIZATION
3
radicalized and consequently as extremists. Additionally, studies indicate that due to migrant
encountering a new culture, culture shock becomes apparent. This group of individuals takes
time to adjust and assimilate with the local communities. It becomes intricate for these
individuals to reconcile their cultural norms with those of the host community (Waldmann,
2010). This cultural indifference mostly results in these individuals seeking middle ground to
make them discernible within the community. In most instances, such tendencies render these
In the wake of any act of terrorism, potential debates emerge regarding the harnessing of the
appropriate to appreciate the prevention of radical acts and the significance therein. Several
measures can suffice to mitigate radicalization. States or cities can afford specific counseling
services for radicalized members. Exit programs can also suffice for supporters and those
prepared to engage in violent acts. The government can also avail resources to assist families of
the radicalized in stemming the vice (Jackson et al., 2019). The feeling of social isolation ought
wiping from the mindset of these individuals to make them feel like part of society.
Additionally, the federal government can accord assistance to the state, private
organizations, and non-governmental organizations that handle the mitigation process. The
federal government can provide funding and expertise since it has the capability. The federal
government should also ensure that these interventions are homegrown, locally driven and
managed to make them acceptable to the communities intend for. In addition, having a locally
RADICALIZATION
4
based individual who is conversant with how the federal government operates could assist in
enhancing relationships, build trust, and act as a facilitator to local terrorism mitigation.
Potential policy approaches suited for mitigating risk populations with one worldview may
not be suited for mitigation of other risk populations promoting different worldviews for various
person’s worldview is the necessary level of belief that they hold. A person differs from other
world’s views because the way one person perceives things is different from how other persons
see the same thing. That is why; diverse populations require different mitigation techniques. The
inherent variations encompass age, sex, religion, and the kinds of challenges encountered. It is
thus prudent for individuals to appreciate these variations before instituting mitigation measures.
Factors that may shape a particular worldview for members of the Diaspora populations
Several factors may inform the radicalization of members of the Diaspora and consequently,
their worldview. One of the elements is how they perceive things. The way individuals think is
imperative since people lead their lives the way they deem best. This notion is inherent in every
human being. Nobody can refute this claim. Secondly, how individuals differentiate wrong from
right profoundly shapes their worldview. Individuals arrive at decisions when having a clear
distinction between what is wrong and right. The members of the Diaspora will live according to
the way they think. Even if something is morally wrong and they perceive it to be correct, then
they will act wrongly and consequently with dire repercussions and vice versa (Waldmann,
2010). Another factor that is bound to shape the worldview of the Diaspora is pragmatism. Many
RADICALIZATION
5
individuals who subscribe to the philosophy of practicality believe that the end justifies the
means. These individuals do not bother about the consequences as long as the task they intended
to accomplish is complete. Individuals tend to compromise if they realize that whatever they
Conclusion
Radicalization is a vice that has disturbed authorities and members of the society for
decades. The reasons why individuals subscribe to this vice are numerous and varied.
Radicalization has made inroads into the hearts of the migrant community, with some self-
proclaimed leaders fueling the extremism inferno. It is time nations and individuals joined
forces to deal with this vice forthwith. Institution of proper policy measures must suffice to help
References
Jackson, B. A., Rhoades, A. L., Reimer, J. R., Lander, N., Costello, K., & Beaghley, S. (2019).
Waldmann, P. K. (2010, March 15). Radicalisation in the diaspora: Why Muslims in the West attack
WCM_GLOBAL_CWaldmann, P. K.
(2010ONTEXT=/elcano/elcano_in/zonas_in/international+terrorism/dt9-2010