Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
27-Sep-16
Demand is Increasing
2
27-Sep-16
(www.un.org)
3
27-Sep-16
4
27-Sep-16
Complexity is increasing
5
27-Sep-16
Mega
Tall
Super
Tall
Tall
Mid
Low Rise
Rise
6
27-Sep-16
7
27-Sep-16
Structures to be
• Safe
• Secure
• Serviceable
• Reliable
• Protective
• The contents of the structures are often much more valuable than structure itself
8
27-Sep-16
9
27-Sep-16
Or
It is by logic we
prove, but by
intuition we
discover
10
27-Sep-16
Conventional Systems
11
27-Sep-16
Interior Systems
Exterior Systems
12
27-Sep-16
13
27-Sep-16
14
27-Sep-16
15
27-Sep-16
Is my Structure safe?
31
Concrete Asia 2016 Naveed Anwar, AIT
16
27-Sep-16
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FagbC09BO2o
Explicit consideration of
partial FOS.
17
27-Sep-16
Design Approaches
Resilience
Based Design
Consequences
and Risk Based
Performance Design
Based Design
Code Based
Design
Intuitive
Design
Design Approaches
Resilience
Based Design
Consequences
and Risk
Performance Based Design
Based Design
Code
Intuitive Based
Design Design
18
27-Sep-16
“Rebuilding In 1908 , a
In 1680 AD, In USA, the The Internat
of London In 1904, a formal
“The Laws of London City ional European
Act” after the Handbook of building
the Building Act of of Baltimore Building Union,
“Great Fire of the Baltimore code was
Indies” Spani 1844. first building Code (IBC) the Eurocodes.
London” in City drafted and
sh Crown code in 1859. by (ICC).
1666 AD. adopted.
The Modern Codes – With “intent” to make buildings safe for public
Extremely Detailed
prescriptions and
equations using
(ACI 318 – 11)
seemingly arbitrary,
rounded limits with
implicit meaning
(IS 456-2000)
19
27-Sep-16
• Did we inform the structures to follow which code when earthquake strikes ?
• Codes change every 3 or years, should we upgrade our structures every 3 or 5 years
to conform ?
20
27-Sep-16
• Public:
• Is my structure safe ?
• Structural Engineer:
• Not sure, but I did follow the “Code”
21
27-Sep-16
Historical Approach:
Earthquake forces proportional to Traditional Codes:
building mass (Vdes = 5 - 10% of Wt), Elastic earthquake forces reduced for
linear design (Vdes = Vmax /R)
Clause 229:
22
27-Sep-16
Design Approaches
Resilience Based
Design
Consequences and
Risk Based Design
Performance
Based Design
Code Based
Design
• Public does not care about the code, or theories or procedures, they care about
“safety” and ‘performance”
23
27-Sep-16
Prescriptive Vs Performance
24
27-Sep-16
Consequences
Hazard
Vulnerability
Operational (O) Immediate Occupancy (IO) Life Safety (LS) Collapse Prevention (CP)
0% Damage or Loss 99 %
25
27-Sep-16
Go Beyond
Codes
Is this acceptable?
Even though it satisfies CBD and PBD
26
27-Sep-16
Design Approaches
Resilience Based
Design
Consequence
and Risk
Performance Based Design
Based Design
Code Based
Design
Beyond PBD
27
27-Sep-16
• For public and society, the performance criteria still does reduce the effects of the
events, but it can reduce the risk level
28
27-Sep-16
• It is not enough to say “Cracking and non-structural damage is acceptable, as long as structure does
not collapse”
• A natural extension of the performance-based design approach
• Structural consequences > DDD (dollars, deaths and downtime) (Porter, 2003).
29
27-Sep-16
National
Federal
Applied Earthquake PEER Tall
Emergency
Technology Hazards Guidelines Buildings CTBUH
Manageme
Council Reduction for Tall Initiatives Guidelines
nt Agency
(ATC) Program Buildings (TBI)
(FEMA) and
(NEHRP)
30
27-Sep-16
Design Approaches
Resilience
Based Design
Consequences
and Risk Based
Performance Design
Based Design
Code Based
Design
31
27-Sep-16
Loss of Loss of
• The key principle in resilience-based design is to limit
expected damage to structural and architectural
Quality of Community
components and egress systems (elevators, stairs, and Life and Culture
doors)
32
27-Sep-16
33
27-Sep-16
• Structure should not collapse completely if one or two elements are “destroyed”
• Step-wise construction sequence analysis is essential for better and correct understating and design
• Make the model, as it is built
• Apply loads as they are applied
• Consider temporary shoring etc
• Consider in-construction corrections
• Consider the aging effects
34
27-Sep-16
35
27-Sep-16
• Rich Pictures
• Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)
• Fuzzy Logic
• Deep Thinking
• Big Data and Data Mining
36
27-Sep-16
Preliminary Sizing
Architectural Structural
Layout Response
37
27-Sep-16
38
27-Sep-16
Smart Everything !
Smart Phone
Smart Car
Smart TV
Smart Home
Smart City
39
27-Sep-16
• Excitation fluctuates so Demand fluctuates • Typically capacity is designed based on “Peak” estimated
demand
• But Capacity is constant • What if peak demand never comes > Un-ecconomical
3
measure and process data
40
27-Sep-16
41
27-Sep-16
42
27-Sep-16
�� Moment
Connections to
Beam Braces
Column
Brace
�� ��
Links
Friction
Damper
Friction Devices
��
Rods
Beam
P
Column
Brace
(a) (b)
Yielding
Damper
43
27-Sep-16
44
27-Sep-16
www.tallbuildingseminar.solutions.ait.asia
45
27-Sep-16
Thank you
46