Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ACINSY
MODULE 7
DISCUSSION
1. ER diagrams usually include the link tables in the model to resolve M:M associations.
REA diagrams typically do not show the link tables. Explain.
When the modelling of a traditional ER diagram it would most often be including link
tables in its model also it can closely reflect the actual database. However, in the REA
diagram it will exclude the link tables as it will not coincide with the rule that an entity
should be connected to an only source and on at least two agent entities. Even though the
existence of link table are very important as a technical requirement for modelling the
database. But the inclusion of these said tables will disrupt the visual integrity of an REA
diagram and in understanding the conceptual model. Therefore during the implementation
the database designer must create link tables just to make database functions.
When it comes to taking account of accounting events, the REA diagrams would rather
focus on the value-chain activities. The value-chain activities are activities that use cash to
obtain resources of capture capital expenditure like equipment, materials and labor and
employ these resources in order to earn new revenues. Setting up account receivable and
other bookkeeping task like recording a sale would not constitute on being value-chain
activity thus those tasks are considered to be invalid entity types and should not be included
in the REA diagram. Thus, REA rejects the accounting artifacts like journal, ledgers and
double-entry system in accounting, those transactions that comprises capturing sufficient
details from transaction data that serves under the traditional accounting requirements are
then not shown in the REA diagram.
3. Describe the minimum number and types of events that an REA diagram must include.
The first step in modelling the REA diagram is the identification of event entities. As
mentioned prior, those that qualify as value-chain activities are the only ones considered as
valid entities. Entities like taking order, ship product and receiving cash are value-added
actions. Thus in an REA model it must contain a minimum of inclusion of two (2) economic
events that will constitute the give and receive activities that would lead to either a reduction
of increase in resources out of such exchange. Moreover, it can also comprise such support
events which do not directly change resources. Thus, identified events must be examined to
whether it is an economic event reflecting the give-receive concept or a supporting event.
4. Distinguish between economic events and support events and provide examples of each.
The REA approach classifies events into two which it may be and economic event or a
support event. Economic Events are phenomena that either increase or decreases directly
resources represented by stock flow relation. An example of these economic events are those
sales of products to customer which reflects the giving-receiving transaction- highly detailed
information, another example is the receipt of cash from customers and acquisition of raw
materials from vendors. On the other hand, support events are those that do not qualify as an
economic event because these do not directly affect in the changes of resources. Support
events include planning, control and other management activities that are in relation to
economic events. An example of support events can be the determination of inventory
before authorizing a sale. Another is the verification of supporting information, and checking
customer credit prior to processing a sale.
5. Explain how REA databases are able to support financial statement reporting when they
do not employ journals and ledgers.
The accounting records like journals, ledgers and the double-entry bookkeeping are
traditional mechanisms for formatting and transmitting accounting data, but these are not
employed in the REA diagram since it only captures the value-chain activities. The REA
systems would determine the essence of what accountants include by modelling the
underlying economic events directly. Organizations using REA can produce financial
statement, journals, ledged and double-entry accounting reports directly from events
identified into database tables via user views.
6. How are external and internal agents modeled in REA diagrams for transactions that
involve purely internal exchanges, such as raw material moving into production?
Cardinality is the degree of association between entities while association is the nature of
relationship between entities. These two shows the relationship between data, the upper
cardinalities for each of the two related entities define the overall association between them.
For example, if the cardinality at one end of the association line is (0, 1) and at the other end
it is (1, M) then the association between them is one-to-many (1:M). Cardinality reflects the
business rules that are in play for any particular firm. The association between these entities
is 1:M, and it will never be 1:1.would imply that the company limits each consumer to a
single order, which is not the case, irrational This pattern also applies to the relationship
between internal agents and event entities. Employees are expected to participate in a variety
of events over the course of their careers, not just one.
10. From the perspective of an organization, explain duality as it relates to the give and
receive events of an economic exchange.
Events that increase the quantity of resource are called “receive” event while if there is a
decrease it will entail a “give” event. When these give and receive events are linked together
this is labelled as a duality relationship. Providing sufficient side of the trade reduces
inventory resource, as indicated by the outflow association, from the perspective of the
organization function being modelled. Each accounting cycle can be described in terms of
give-to-get economic duality relationships. Not every relationship between two events
represents a give-to-get economic duality. Commitment events are linked to other events to
reflect sequential cause-effect relationships. Thus, the inflow association's economic
resources are expanded by the receive portion of the exchange.