Professional Documents
Culture Documents
To cite this article: Gang Zhu, Pedro Membiela Iglesia & Ke Wang (2020): Examining Chinese
and Spanish preservice teachers’ practicum teaching experiences: a transformative learning
perspective, Journal of Education for Teaching, DOI: 10.1080/02607476.2019.1708623
Article views: 5
a
Institute for International and Comparative Education, East China Normal University, China; bDepartment of
Special Didactics, University of Vigo, Vigo, Spain; cDepartment of Teaching, Learning and Culture, Texas A&M
University, College Station, USA
Introduction
International scholars acknowledge the potential contributions of teaching practicums to
preservice teachers’ professional development and particularly professional identity con-
struction (e.g. Zhu, Waxman, Rivera, & Burlbaw, 2018; Zhu & Zhu, 2018). The primary
purpose of practicum experiences is to provide preservice teachers with opportunities to
become acquainted with the requirements of their future teaching, develop repertoires of
pedagogies, and construct professional identities (Lawson et al., 2015).
Considering the turbulence of learning to teach during the practicum period, this
paper endeavours to unpack how the preservice teachers enact their transformative
learning (Mezirow, 1994; Mezirow & Associates, 2000) in the teaching practicum context.
Moreover, there is no explicit international comparative study that explores Chinese and
Spanish preservice teachers’ professional practicum experiences, which represent the
Confucius-culture inherited society and the western society, respectively.
Theoretical framework
Originally formulated by Mezirow (1994, 2000), Mezirow and Associates (2000) and then
widely disseminated by others (e.g. Kumi-Yeboah and James 2012; Meijer, De Graaf, &
Methodology
Contexts and participants
This study was situated in two four-year university-based teacher education programmes
in China and Spain respectively. The first author distributed the metaphorical professional
identity instructions to the EFL preservice teachers. Overall, 22 Chinese (n = 11) and
Spanish (n = 11) preservice teachers who finished their teaching practicums agreed to
participate in this research. Among these participants, seventeen are female and five are
male. Twelve student-taught in public middle schools and ten in public high schools.
Findings
Disorienting dilemma
The disorienting dilemma is widespread among both the Chinese and Spanish participants.
Since the teaching practicum encompasses multifaceted tasks, including designing lesson
plans, classroom management, and communicating with parents, it is understandable that
the participants encounter discomfort and disequilibrium. These disorienting dilemmas
demonstrate the conflict with one’s pre-existing frame of reference (Meziorw 2000).
JOURNAL OF EDUCATION FOR TEACHING 3
Behaviour changes
As the teaching practice progressed, the participants changed their daily instructional
practices more readily to accommodate the students’ various learning needs. For
instance, the Chinese participant C9 became more pedagogically pupil-centred.
Additionally, C11 developed more sophisticated understandings about grading and
lecturing by participating in a series of professional development sessions. Meanwhile,
the Spanish participant S8 gained more teaching autonomy as evidenced by his oppor-
tunities for more favoured instructional approaches.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the Southwest Education Research Association Research Grant. We
feel indebted to Ms. Jinfei Zhu, who assisted us in the data collection. Furthermore, we thank the
anonymous reviewers and the JET Editors, who provided insight and expertise that greatly
improved this manuscript.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Funding
This work was supported by the Peak Discipline Construction Project of Education at East China
Normal University, China.
ORCID
Gang Zhu http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3169-8424
Ke Wang http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0491-0613
References
Allen, J. M., and S. E. Wright. 2014. “Integrating Theory and Practice in the Pre-service Teacher
Education Practicum.” Teachers and Teaching 20 (2): 136–151. doi:10.1080/13540602.2013.848568.
Craig, C. J., Y. Zou, and R. Poimbeauf. 2015. “Journal Writing as a Way to Know Culture: Insights from
a Travel Study Abroad Program.” Teachers and Teaching 21 (4): 472–489. doi:10.1080/
13540602.2014.968894.
DeCapua, A., H. W. Marshall, and N. Frydland. 2018. “The Transformational Learning Journey of
a Novice ESL Teacher of Low-literate Adults.” Journal of Transformative Education 16 (1): 17–38.
doi:10.1177/1541344617704645.
Illeris, K. 2014. “Transformative Learning and Identity.” Journal of Transformative Education 12 (2):
148–163. doi:10.1177/1541344614548423.
Kumi-Yeboah, A., and W. James. 2012. “Transformational Teaching Experience of A Novice Teacher:
A Narrative of an Award-winning Teacher.” Adult Learning 23 (4): 170–177. doi:10.1177/
1045159512457354.
Lawson, T., M. Çakmak, M. Gündüz, and H. Busher. 2015. “Research on Teaching Practicum–a
Systematic Review.” European Journal of Teacher Education 38 (3): 392–407.
Meijer, P. C., G. De Graaf, and J. Meirink. 2011. “Key Experiences in Student Teachers’ Development.”
Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice. 17 (1): 115–129.
Meziorw, J. Associates. 2000. Learning as Transformation: Critical Perspectives on a Theory in Progress.
San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Mezirow, J. 1994. “Understanding Transformative Theory.” Adult Education Quarterly 44: 222–232.
Mezirow, J. 1997. Transformative learning: Theory to practice. In P. Cranton (Ed.) Transformative
learning in action: New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education (pp. 5–12). San Francisco, CA:
Jossey-Bass.
Mezirow, J. 2000. Learning as Transformation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Saban, A., B. N. Kocbeker, and A. Saban. 2007. “Prospective Teachers' Conceptions of Teaching and
Learning Revealed Through Metaphor Analysis.” Learning and Instruction 17 (2): 123–139.
JOURNAL OF EDUCATION FOR TEACHING 5