Before the amendment act of 1955, the case was different where a judge was required to

record his reason in case where he preferred to pronounce a lesser punishment of Life
imprisonment instead of death penalty to a murderer. However, the Supreme court Before the
amendment act of 1955, the case was different where a judge was required to record his
reason in case where he preferred to pronounce a lesser punishment of Life imprisonment
instead of death penalty to a murderer. However, the Supreme court Before the amendment
act of 1955, the case was different where a judge was required to record his reason in case
where he preferred to pronounce a lesser punishment of Life imprisonment instead of death
penalty to a murderer. However, the Supreme court Before the amendment act of 1955, the
case was different where a judge was required to record his reason in case where he preferred
to pronounce a lesser punishment of Life imprisonment instead of death penalty to a
murderer. However, the Supreme court Before the amendment act of 1955, the case was
different where a judge was required to record his reason in case where he preferred to
pronounce a lesser punishment of Life imprisonment instead of death penalty to a murderer.
However, the Supreme court Before the amendment act of 1955, the case was different where
a judge was required to record his reason in case where he preferred to pronounce a lesser
punishment of Life imprisonment instead of death penalty to a murderer. However, the
Supreme court Before the amendment act of 1955, the case was different where a judge was
required to record his reason in case where he preferred to pronounce a lesser punishment of
Life imprisonment instead of death penalty to a murderer. However, the Supreme court
Before the amendment act of 1955, the case was different where a judge was required to
record his reason in case where he preferred to pronounce a lesser punishment of Life
imprisonment instead of death penalty to a murderer. However, the Supreme court Before the
amendment act of 1955, the case was different where a judge was required to record his
reason in case where he preferred to pronounce a lesser punishment of Life imprisonment
instead of death penalty to a murderer. However, the Supreme court Before the amendment
act of 1955, the case was different where a judge was required to record his reason in case
where he preferred to pronounce a lesser punishment of Life imprisonment instead of death
penalty to a murderer. However, the Supreme court Before the amendment act of 1955, the
case was different where a judge was required to record his reason in case where he preferred
to pronounce a lesser punishment of Life imprisonment instead of death penalty to a
murderer. However, the Supreme court Before the amendment act of 1955, the case was
different where a judge was required to record his reason in case where he preferred to
pronounce a lesser punishment of Life imprisonment instead of death penalty to a murderer.
However, the Supreme court Before the amendment act of 1955, the case was different where
a judge was required to record his reason in case where he preferred to pronounce a lesser
punishment of Life imprisonment instead of death penalty to a murderer. However, the
Supreme court Before the amendment act of 1955, the case was different where a judge was
required to record his reason in case where he preferred to pronounce a lesser punishment of
Life imprisonment instead of death penalty to a murderer. However, the Supreme court
Before the amendment act of 1955, the case was different where a judge was required to
record his reason in case where he preferred to pronounce a lesser punishment of Life
imprisonment instead of death penalty to a murderer. However, the Supreme court Before the
amendment act of 1955, the case was different where a judge was required to record his
reason in case where he preferred to pronounce a lesser punishment of Life imprisonment
instead of death penalty to a murderer. However, the Supreme court Before the amendment
act of 1955, the case was different where a judge was required to record his reason in case
where he preferred to pronounce a lesser punishment of Life imprisonment instead of death
penalty to a murderer. However, the Supreme court Before the amendment act of 1955, the
case was different where a judge was required to record his reason in case where he preferred
to pronounce a lesser punishment of Life imprisonment instead of death penalty to a
murderer. However, the Supreme court Before the amendment act of 1955, the case was
different where a judge was required to record his reason in case where he preferred to
pronounce a lesser punishment of Life imprisonment instead of death penalty to a murderer.
However, the Supreme court Before the amendment act of 1955, the case was different where
a judge was required to record his reason in case where he preferred to pronounce a lesser
punishment of Life imprisonment instead of death penalty to a murderer. However, the
Supreme court Before the amendment act of 1955, the case was different where a judge was
required to record his reason in case where he preferred to pronounce a lesser punishment of
Life imprisonment instead of death penalty to a murderer. However, the Supreme court
Before the amendment act of 1955, the case was different where a judge was required to
record his reason in case where he preferred to pronounce a lesser punishment of Life
imprisonment instead of death penalty to a murderer. However, the Supreme court Before the
amendment act of 1955, the case was different where a judge was required to record his
reason in case where he preferred to pronounce a lesser punishment of Life imprisonment
instead of death penalty to a murderer. However, the Supreme court Before the amendment
act of 1955, the case was different where a judge was required to record his reason in case
where he preferred to pronounce a lesser punishment of Life imprisonment instead of death
penalty to a murderer. However, the Supreme court Before the amendment act of 1955, the
case was different where a judge was required to record his reason in case where he preferred
to pronounce a lesser punishment of Life imprisonment instead of death penalty to a
murderer. However, the Supreme court Before the amendment act of 1955, the case was
different where a judge was required to record his reason in case where he preferred to
pronounce a lesser punishment of Life imprisonment instead of death penalty to a murderer.
However, the Supreme court