You are on page 1of 3

Baseline / Marine Pollution Bulletin 44 (2002) 71–81 79

Storelli, M.M., Marcotrigiano, G.O., 2000a. Environmental contam- Storelli, M.M., Zizzo, N., Marcotrigiano, G.O., 1999. Heavy metals
ination in bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus): relationship and methylmercury in tissues of Risso’s dolphin (Grampus griseus)
between levels of metals, methylmercury and organochlorine and Cuvier’s beaked whale (Ziphius cavirostris) stranded in Italy
compounds in an adult female, her neonate, and a calf. Bulletin (South Adriatic Sea). Bulletin of Environmental Contamination
of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 64, 333–340. and Toxicology 63, 703–710.
Storelli, M.M., Marcotrigiano, G.O., 2000b. Persistent organochlorine Wagemann, R., Hunt, R., Klaverkamp, J.F., 1984. Subcellular distri-
residues in Risso’s dolphins (Grampus griseus) from the Mediter- bution of heavy metals in liver and kidney of a narwhal whale
ranean Sea (Italy). Marine Pollution Bulletin 40, 555–558. (Monodon monoceros): an evaluation for the presence of metallo-
Storelli, M.M., Ceci, E., Marcotrigiano, G.O., 1998. Comparison of thionein. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 78C, 301–
total mercury, methylmercury and selenium in muscle tissues and in 307.
the liver of Stenella coeruleoalba (Meyen) and Caretta caretta Yagle, M.K., Palmiter, R.D., 1985. Coordinate regulation of mouse
(Linnaeus). Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxi- metallothionein I and II genes by heavy metals and glucocorticoids.
cology 61, 541–547. Molecular and Cellular Biology 5, 291–294.

0025-326X/02/$ - see front matter Ó 2002 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.


PII: S 0 0 2 5 - 3 2 6 X ( 0 1 ) 0 0 2 2 1 - 1

Chlorinated pesticides in mussels from Guanabara Bay,


Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
uning, I. Moreira *
A.P. Xavier de Brito, I.M.R. De Andrade Br€
Department of Chemistry, Pontifıcia Universidade Cat
olica, Rua Marqu^
es de S~
ao Vicente, 225, CEP. 22453-900, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Chlorinated pesticides are common pollutants in public health institutions have permission to use DDT
coastal areas and estuaries (Farrington, 1983; Tanabe against specific pests causing serious illnesses, e.g.
et al., 1989; Sanchez et al., 1993; Ruangwises et al., dengue fever or Chagas’ disease. A trend away from the
1994; Jernelov, 1996), resulting mainly from agricultural use of organochlorines exists, with organophosphate use
practices and insect control. As hydrophobic com- becoming more common.
pounds, organochlorines exhibit a high affinity for lipids Fig. 1 presents a map of Guanabara Bay and the
and tend to accumulate in marine organisms. Mussels collection sites. Perna perna can be found at several lo-
have traditionally been used as sentinels for monitoring cations near the entrance of the Bay, where the mussels
such compounds. either grow naturally or are cultivated by fishermen.
Guanabara Bay is a coastal area of great economic Station 1 was located at the mussel cultivation area of
importance in the Brazilian south eastern coast line. It is the Jurujuba Fishermen Corporation; Station 2, near the
surrounded by three cities (Rio de Janeiro, S~ao Goncßalo Santos-Dumont City Airport; Stations 3 and 4 on pillars
and Niteroi) with a total population of about 11 million. of the Rio de Janeiro-Niter oi bridge; and Station 5 lies
The Bay receives discharges of chemical contami- in Niteroi, on the Boa Viagem Beach.
nants together with domestic, industrial and agricultural The samples were collected during the first two weeks
wastewaters. Guanabara Bay is 384 km2 in area, and of August (winter) and in December (summer) 1996.
the climate involves warm, wet summers and dry, cool The mussels were wrapped in aluminum foil previously
winters. A detailed study of the Bay has been published rinsed with a series of pesticide grade solvents (acetone,
by Kjerfve et al. (1997). Its average water depth is 5.7 m, ethanol and normal hexane), and were kept frozen until
although the central channel reaches 30 m in depth. The reaching the laboratory. 10 mussels of similar size (4–6
rate of sediment deposition is 1:6  0:6 cm yr 1 (Godoy cm) were composited for each location. The soft tissues
et al., 1998). The mean freshwater discharge is 100  were separated from the valves and were freeze-dried,
59 m3 s 1 and is highest in the summer. prior to grinding and homogenising.
The present paper reports the occurrence of eight The samples (2 g) were spiked with 20 ll of n-hexane
chlorinated pesticides in common mussels Perna perna containing 0:53 lg ml 1 of tetrachlorometaxylene
sampled at five stations within the Bay. In Brazil, the use (TCMX) which was used as an internal standard. The
of these compounds has been banned or restricted. Only samples were then Soxhlet extracted for 24 h with 200 ml
of pesticide-grade hexane purified through Florisil col-
umns.
The extract was concentrated to about 10 ml in a
* Corresponding author. rotary evaporator and cleaned up by vigorous shaking
80 Baseline / Marine Pollution Bulletin 44 (2002) 71–81

analytical standard. TCB was also used to determine the


relative electron-capture detector response factors of the
eight organochlorinated pesticide standards.
The extracts were analysed in a gas chromatograph
(Varian Star 3600 CV Model) using Ni63 electron-cap-
ture detection and a fused silica DB-5 capillary column
of 50 m  0:25 mm and film thickness 0:25 lm. Splitless
mode injections of 1 ll volume were used for all samples.
The column temperature was programmed from 80 °C
to 205 °C at 5 °C min 1 , with an isothermal period of 15
min, followed by a second programme from 205 °C
to 290 °C at 2 °C min 1 . The analytical conditions were
chosen to assure complete separation of the pesticides of
interest from PCB peaks present in the samples.
The extraction procedure was applied to a certified
standard (Marine Environmental Laboratory, Monaco)
for pesticide mussel contamination. The results obtained
for the certified sample were within the quoted confi-
dence intervals. The extraction recoveries were calcu-
lated for the samples with added TCMX, and offered a
mean value of 76%.
Table 1 shows the contamination of the mussels of
Guanabara Bay. All monitored pesticides were detected
at each station, and in general their concentrations were
higher during the dry season (August). This is probably
caused by the higher dilution of inflowing pesticide
residues in the rainy summer season (in December).
In general, the concentrations of the DDT group of
Fig. 1. A map of Guanabara Bay, showing the sampling stations. pesticides were higher than those of the other orga-
nochlorines measured here. Amongst these, DDE pre-
dominated in most samples, although the proportion of
unmetabolised DDT was significant in almost all sam-
with 2 ml of concentrated sulphuric acid. Phase sepa- ples, at both times of sampling. It is clear that DDT
ration was achieved after 12 h in an icebox; the upper continues to be washed into the estuary from sources
hexane layer was removed and passed through an alu- within the catchment.
mina column deactivated with 5% water. The solution The concentrations of aldrin, dieldrin and lindane
was eluted with a mixture of hexane-dichloromethane were all similar in general terms, and varied little be-
(90:10) and evaporated under nitrogen. The concen- tween most of the sites/times of sampling. By compari-
trated extract was transferred to previously weighed son, the levels of HCB found in P. perna were mostly
glass ampoules. The sample was weighed and an aliquot low.
of 0.5 ml was transferred into an auto sampler vial The spatial differences between the sites were not
where trichlorobenzene (TCB) was added as an internal particularly marked, and were inconsistent. However,

Table 1
1
Concentrations of organochlorine pesticides (ng g dry weight) in mussels from Guanabara Bay, Brazil
August December
Station 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 5
HCB 0.16 4.59 0.15 0.07 0.64 0.001 0.0002 1.66 0.90
Lindane 3.23 2.61 1.93 4.45 5.89 0.82 0.81 0.89 1.02
DDE 18.3 5.20 43.9 0.60 13.6 4.91 3.53 9.89 21.7
DDD 2.05 1.31 6.53 2.40 19.5 0.63 0.91 0.28 5.80
DDT 16.9 6.86 13.6 6.55 5.53 3.30 2.40 0.34 4.19
Aldrin 2.26 3.42 1.76 3.83 7.29 0.57 1.34 0.63 1.07
Dieldrin 2.67 2.87 14.9 4.01 5.08 2.66 1.50 2.47 0.54
    
Endrin 9.91 12.3 2.35 1.49
No sample could be taken at location No. 4 in December 1996.
*
Not determined, due to interference of peaks.
Baseline / Marine Pollution Bulletin 44 (2002) 71–81 81

there was a trend towards lower pesticide levels in the Jernelov, A., 1996. The international mussel watch: a global
mussels from Station 2, near the entrance to the Bay. assessment of environmental levels of chemical contaminants.
The Science of the Total Environment 188 (suppl. 1), S37–S44.
Kjerfve, B., Ribeiro, C.H.A., Dias, G.T.H., Fillipo, A.M., Quaresma,
Acknowledgements V.da.S., 1997. Oceanographic characteristics of an impacted
coastal bay: Baia de Guanabara, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Conti-
nental Shelf Research 17, 1609–1643.
This work was sponsored by CAPES. A.P. Xavier de Ruangwises, S.I., Ruangwises, N., Tabucanon, M.S., 1994. Persis-
Brito and I.M.R. de Andrade Br€uning are thankful re- tent organochlorine pesticide residues in green mussels (Perna
spectively to CNPq and FAPERJ for financial support. viridis) from Gulf of Thailand. Marine Pollution Bulletin 28,
351–355.
Sanchez, J., Sole, M., Albaiges, J., 1993. A comparison of distributions
References of PCB congeners and other chlorinated compounds in fishes from
coastal areas and remote lakes. International Journal of Environ-
Farrington, J.W., 1983. Bivalves as sentinels of coastal chemical mental Analytical Chemistry 50, 269–284.
pollution: the mussel (and oyster) watch. Oceanus 26, 18–29. Tanabe, S., Kannan, N., Fukushima, M., Okamoto, T., Wakimoto, T.,
Godoy, J.M., Moreira, I., Bragancßa, M.J., Wanderley, C., Mendes, Tatsukawa, R., 1989. Persistent organochlorines in Japanese
L.B., 1998. A study of Guabanara Bay sedimentation rates. coastal waters: an introspective summary from a Far East
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 227, 157–160. developed nation. Marine Pollution Bulletin 20, 344–352.

0025-326X/02/$ - see front matter Ó 2002 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.


PII: S 0 0 2 5 - 3 2 6 X ( 0 1 ) 0 0 2 2 2 - 3

You might also like