20191118-Design Report

design report for santcruz bridge HV constructions
Project Demolition & reconstruction of vehicular bridge on Juhu road near SNDT bus stop
Client Municipal corporation of Greater Mumbai
Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
Document title Design of sub-structure & super-structure
Prepared AG Checked Ramesh Approved HV Date 11/16/2019
Document no. SYNT-04-SANTA-Design-001 Rev No. R0
Data
1. Introduction
2. Sectional properties & Span configuration
3. Material properties
4. Load and Load combinations
5. Design of solid slab
6. Design of piles
Annexure 1 : Calculation for soil springs
Annexure 2 : Calculation for minimum reinforcement requirement
Annexure 3 : Calculation for confinement reinforcement in piles
syntegrity consulting pvt. ltd.

design report for santcruz bridge HV constructions
Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.


design of santacruz bridge HV construction
Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
Data Ref.
1. Introduction
1.1 Project description
MCGM has awarded a design built tender for demolition and reconstruction of a bridge
over a creek near SNDT College on Juhu Tara road to HV constructions. The bridge is over
a main road connecting Santacruz to Juhu and form a main connection road between Bandra
to JVPD. The span is 16.6 m and width is 30.5 m approx for both way traffic forming 15.25
m going to Santacruz for eastward travel and 15.25 m going towards Juhu for westward
travel. The scope of work includes demotition of existing bridge and rebuilding a new in
two phases, first for west ward traffic flow and opening the traffic and demolition and
construction of the bridge for estward traffic. This report deals in the detail design report of
the work.
The design and analysis is carried out in MIDAS software and the out put of the same is
attached herewith. The soft copy of the MIDAS out put is also attached for review. The
contents of the report also include the design calculations and drawings for review and
approval.
1.2 Bridge description
Bridge orientation = east-west on Juhu Tara Road near SNDT college at

Santacruz (w)
span = 16.6 m
width = 30.5 m
east ward carriage way 11.5 m three lanes
west ward carrieage way 11.5 m three lanes
foot path on both sides with utility gallery placed below
raising the whole road by 600 mm over the existing level to accommodate for SWD flow
requirements for high flood Level in rainy seasons
refer the GAD for more details
1.3 Construction Methodology
The existing bridge shall be demolished.

a) The water channel will be filled with soil accomodating for small water flow by providing
RC pipes below.
b) secant piles of 1200 mm shall be cast on both sides which forms support for the RCC deck
slab forming the bridge
c) on the top, compacted soil + soling/ GSB shall be laid over which M-10 grade PCC shall be
laid, and LDPE sheets shall be laid over the PCC.
d) over thsis arrangement reinfocement shall be placed and RCC slab cast monolith with the
Secant piles wall on both sides.
e) after the slab is cast/ cured soil below shall be excavted and the channel made good.
syntegrity consulting pvt.ltd.

design of santacruz bridge HV construction
Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.

f) wearing coat of 87 mm thick shall be laid and crash barriers, footh path with utility
corridors shall be installed to complete the bridge for operations
References:
i) IRC - 112 : IRC - Code of practice for concrete road bridges
ii) IRC - 6 : IRC - Standard specifications & code of practice for
concrete road bridges - Section II - Load & load
combinations
syntegrity consulting pvt.ltd.

design report for santacruz bridge H V construction
Consulting Client Municipal corporation of Greater Mumbai
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
Data Ref.
2. Sectional properties & Span configuration
2.1 Plan, Elevation & Cross-sections
Fig. 2.1 : Plan of the bridge
syntergrity consultant pvt. ltd.

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
Fig. 2.2 : Elevation of the bridge
Fig. 2.3 : Typical cross-section at mid-span

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
Fig. 2.4 : Typical cross-section at end-span
2.2 Span configuration/ Cross sectional details
Clear width of bridge at nallah : 15.4 m

Bridge length (centre length of piles) : 16.6 m
Bridge length (End of capping beams) : 18.55 m
Bridge alignment : Straight

Total deck width of bridge : 30.8 m
Clear cover to any reinforcement - Solid slab : 50 mm

Clear cover to any reinforcement - Secant piles & capping beam : 75 mm
Thickness of solid slab : 950 mm
Width of capping beam : 1575 mm

Depth of capping beam : 2150 mm

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
Diameter of piles : 1200 mm
Centre to centre distance between soft and hard piles : 900 mm
2.3 Structural idealization - MIDAS Model
A three-dimensional space frame model is developed in MIDAS. Superstructure as well as substructure is modelled with appropriate structural
and soil stiffness. It should be noted that soil springs are taken from GIR. Loads are applied at appropriate levels on structural model to
effectively simulate loading conditions.
Fig. 2.5 : 3-D space frame

model in MIDAS
Secant piles
Soild slab
Capping beams

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
Fig. 2.6 : Rendered view of

MIDAS model

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
Displacment retrained at the pile toe level Lateral support for the piles

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.

Compression only support to the piles
Fig. 2.7 : Soil spring support to

piles
Note : It is to be noted here that half of the bridge in transverse direction is modelled. Since, carriage way in other direction is separated by a
gap of 100mm and is mirror image of other carriageway.

design report for santacruz bridge H V constructions
Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
Data Ref.
3. Material properties
3.1 Concrete properties
Solid slab & capping beam
Grade of concrete - Solid slab : M50

Density of reinforced concrete : 25 kN/m 3
Partial safety factor gm : 1.5
Characteristic compressive strength f ck : 50 MPa
Mean compressive strength f cm : 60 MPa
Secant modulus of elasticity E cm : 35220 MPa
Mean axial tensile strength f ctm : 3.52 MPa Table 6.5
Chracterstic axial tensile strength (5% fractile) f ctk,0.05 : 2.46 MPa - IRC112
Design axial tensile strength f ctd : 1.64 MPa
Design compressive strength f cd : 22.33 MPa
Maximum compressive stress : 24 MPa
Maximum tensile stress (Rare combination) : 3.52 MPa
Maximum tensile stress (Frequent combination) : 0 MPa
Secant piles
Grade of concrete - Hard piles considered only for design : M35

Density of reinforced concrete : 25 kN/m 3
Partial safety factor gm : 1.5
Characteristic compressive strength f ck : 35 MPa
Mean compressive strength f cm : 45 MPa
Secant modulus of elasticity E cm : 32308 MPa
Mean axial tensile strength f ctm : 2.77 MPa Table 6.5
Chracterstic axial tensile strength (5% fractile) f ctk,0.05 : 1.94 MPa - IRC112
Design axial tensile strength f ctd : 1.29 MPa
Design compressive strength f cd : 15.63 MPa
Maximum compressive stress : 16.8 MPa
Maximum tensile stress (Rare combination) : 2.77 MPa
Maximum tensile stress (Frequent combination) : 0 MPa
3.2 Reinforcement steel properties
Grade of reinforcement : Fe-500D Table

Partial safety factor gs : 1.15 18.1 &
Characterstic strength f yk : 500 MPa Clause
Design yield strength f yd : 434.8 MPa 6.2.2 of
Modulus of elasticity Es : 200000 MPa IRC112
syntegrity consultant pvt. ltd.

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
syntegrity consultant pvt. ltd.

design report for santacruz bridge H V Constructions
Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
Data Ref.
4. Load and Load combinations
4.1 Basic loads
Various loads are calculated in unit dimensions and applied in MIDAS for contributory
width of individual grillage member.
4.1.1 Dead loads
Dead load of the entire structure is considered corresponding to cross-sectional properties

and density of concrete.
Capping beam is modelled as plate element with appropriate thickness and secant piles are
considered as beam element. Dead weight of the same is considered corresponding to it's
density.
4.1.2 Super-imposed dead load
SIDL - Permanent
Weight of crash barrier : 7 kN/m

Weight of crash barrier with railing : 8 kN/m
Weight of railing for footpath : 5 kN/m
Thickness of PCC over footpath : 700 mm

Width of footpath : 2700 mm
3
Density of PCC : 25 kN/m
Total weight of PCC per unit length of bridge : 47.25 kN/m
SIDL - Varying
Wearing course per unit area : 2 kN/m 2
4.1.3 Vehicular live load
Width of carriage-way : 11.5 m Table 6

Number of lanes of live loads : 3 of
IRC:06
Possible combination of live load shall be:
a) One lane of class A Table
b) Two lane of class A 6A of
c) Three lane of class A IRC:06
d) One lane of class 70R (wheel)
e) One lane of class 70R (track)
f) One lane of class A along with one lane of class 70R(wheel)
g) One lane of class A along with one lane of class 70R(track)
Description of Class A loading Fig. 2

of
IRC:06
syntegrity consultants pvt ltd

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
Description of Class 70R loading (Wheel) Fig. 1

of
Description of Class 70R loading (Track)
Impact factor
For class A loading : 19.9%

Fig.9 of
For class 70R loading (wheel) : 19.9%
IRC:06
For class 70R loading (track) : 10.0%
To be on conservative side, impact factor is taken as 20% for each loading class.
4.1.4 Footpath live load
Footpath live load P : 5 kN/m 2

Width of footpath : 2700 mm
Total weight of FPLL per unit length of bridge : 13.5 kN/m
4.1.5 Thermal loads- Uniform temperature rise/ fall

Fig. 15
Highest maximum temperature : 42.5 o C & 16 of
Lowest minimum temperature : 10 o C IRC:06

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
Bridge temperature when it is effectively restrained : 36.25 o C
16.25 o C
Max. temperature difference : 26.25 o C
Clause
6.4.2.5
For calculating effect of seasonal temperature variation, value of 0.5 time E cm may be used
of
to account for temperature induced stresses. Alternatively, temperature difference is taken
IRC:11
half of designated value with full E cm.
2
4.1.6 Wind load

Clause
Wind speed is restricted to 36 m/s instead of maximum spead 39.6 m/s to take live load
209.3.7
contribtion. Otherwise, live load contribution will be neglected which will not govern the
of
design.
IRC:6
Gust factor G : 2 Clause

Drag coefficient - Superstructure C d,Super : 1.1 209.3.3
&
Drag coefficient - Live load C d,LL : 1.2
209.3.5
Lift coefficient for vertical wind CL : 0.75 of
IRC:6
Basic wind speed - Plain terrain : 36 m/sec Table
Hourly mean wind speed (height upto 10m ) VZ : 30.3 m/sec 12 of
2
Hourly mean wind pressure (height upto 10m ) PZ : 551.8 N/m IRC:6
2
Exposed area in transverse direction of superstructure A1 : 1.85 m /m
2
Exposed area in transverse direction of live load A2 : 2.1 m /m
F T1 Clause
Wind force in transverse direction - Superstructure : 2.2 kN/m
209.3.3
Point of application of wind load - Superstructure e T1 : 0.925 m
of
(Reference point - Soffit of solid slab) IRC:6
Wind force in transverse direction - Live load F T2 : 2.8 kN/m

Point of application of wind load - Live load e T2 : 2.9 m
(Reference point - Soffit of solid slab)
Clause
Wind force in longitudinal direction - Superstructure F L1 : 0.56 kN/m 209.3.4
Point of application of wind load - Superstructure e L1 : 0.925 m of
Clause
Wind force in longitudinal direction - Live load F L2 : 0.70 kN/m 209.3.4
Point of application of wind load - Live load e L2 : 2.9 m of
2
Wind force in upward/ downward direction FV : 0.83 kN/m
Note :
1) Wind speed is restricted to 36 m/s than 39.6 m/s to take live load contribution.
2) Wind pressure is considered for plain terrain & height of exposed surface from mean

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
2) Wind pressure is considered for plain terrain & height of exposed surface from mean
retarding surface upto 10m .
4.1.7 Seismic coefficients

Table
Seismic zone factor (Corresponding to zone IV) Z : 0.16 16 & 19
Importance factor for bridge (Bridge over railway line) I : 1.2 of
Soil type at bridge location : Medium soil IRC:06
Time period of structure - Longitudinal shaking TL : 0.200
Time period of structure - Transverse shaking TT : 0.200 Clause
Average response acceleration coefficient (S a /g) L : 2.500 219.5.1 -
Average response acceleration coefficient (S a /g) T : 2.500 IRC:06
Response reduction factor R : 3
Horizontal seismic coefficient - Longitudinal : 0.080

Horizontal seismic coefficient - Transverse : 0.080
Vertical seismic coefficient : Not required for zone-III
To be on conservative side, maximum seismic force is applied corresponding to Sa/g = 2.5.

Seismic force in transverse direction is ignored as structural has very large stiffness in
transverse direction and reinforcement requirement due to same will be negligible.
4.1.8 Braking force
Braking force is applied at level which is 1.2m above top of levelling course placed on solid
slab. To facilitate load application in MIDAS, braking force is applied as uniformly
distributed force for entire length of bridge where live load can be placed.
Case : 1 - When three lanes of class-A is loaded
Total braking force for entire bridge length : 245 kN
Case : 2 - When one lane of class-A is loaded along with one lane of class 70R
Total braking force for entire bridge length : 223 kN
4.1.9 Differential settlement
Settlement of the pile group is considered in MIDAS corresponding to 6mm for all the piles
either at abutment A1 or abutment A2.
4.1.10 Earth pressure & Live load surcharge
Soil pressure corresponding to at rest condition is applied on capping beam and part of
secant piles which is exposed to environment at nallah side.
o
Angle of internal friction of soil : 20
Submerged soil density : 10 kN/m 3
Water density : 10 kN/m 3

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
Earth pressure coe. - At rest condition : 0.66
Depth of secant piles : 15.54 m
Depth of capping beam : 2.15 m
Surcharge load : 24 kN/m 2
Soil pressure :- Soil pressure on capping beam and part of secant pile (accounting for
appropriate contributory width) is applied as linearly varying load corresponding to at rest
condition in MIDAS.
Surcharge pressure :- Surcharge pressure on capping beam and part of secant pile
(accounting for appropriate contributory width) is applied as uniform load corresponding to
at rest condition in MIDAS.
Water pressure :- Water pressure on capping beam and part of secant pile (accounting for
appropriate contributory width) is applied as linearly varying hydrostatic load in MIDAS.
0 kN/m 2 0 kN/m 2
14.147 kN/m 2 21.5 kN/m 2
27.306 15.792 kN/m 2 41.5
40.466 61.5
102.25 kN/m 2 155.4 kN/m 2
Earth pressure (Submergered) Surcharge pressure for unit Hydrostatic pressure for
for unit width width unit width
4.2 Load combinations
4.2.1 Partial safety factors for verification of structural strength Table

B.2 of
Basic combination Seismic IRC:06
Live load Wind load Temp. load combi-
leading leading leading nation
Dead load 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.35
SIDL - Surfacing 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75
SIDL - Fixed 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.35
Vehicular live loads
a) Leading 1.5 - - -
b) Accompanying - 1.15 1.15 0.2
Wind load
a) Leading - 1.5 - -
b) Accompanying 0.9 - 0.9 -
Temperature load

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
a) Leading - - 1.5 -
b) Accompanying 0.9 0.9 - 0.5
Seismic force 1.5
Earth pressure 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.0
LL Surcharge 1.2 1.2 1.2 0.2
Water pressure 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Note :
1) All possible load combination are prepared with respect to leading and accompanying
load type.
2) Accidental load combinations are not considered for superstructure design as it is evident
from load combinations that these will not govern the design.
4.2.2 Partial safety factors for verification of serviceability limit state Table
B.3 of
Rare combination IRC:06
Live load leading
Wind load Temp. load
Wind Temperature
leading leading
accompany accompany
Dead load 1 1 1 1
SIDL - Surfacing 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2
SIDL - Fixed 1 1 1 1
Settlement effects 1 1 1 1
Vehicular live loads
a) Leading 1 1 - -
b) Accompanying - - 0.75 0.75
Temperature effects
a) Leading - - - 1
b) Accompanying 0.6 - - -
Wind loads
a) Leading - - 1 -
b) Accompanying - 0.6 - -
Earth pressure 1 1 1 1
LL Surcharge 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
Water pressure 1 1 1 1
Quasi-
permanent
combination
Dead load 1
SIDL - Surfacing 1.2
SIDL - Fixed 1
Settlement effects 1
Earth pressure 1

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
Data Ref.
5. Design of solid slab
5.1 Analysis results
Fig. 5.1 Bending moment diagram in ULS

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
Fig. 5.2 Bending moment diagram in SLS - Stress check

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
Fig. 5.3 Bending moment diagram in SLS - Crack width check

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
Fig. 5.4 Shear force diagram in ULS

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
Following sections are checked using adsec for flexure check:
Section - 1
1. Section at face of capping beam (Largest hogging moment in the slab)
Section - 2
2. Section at mid span (Largest sagging moment in the slab)
Section - 3
3. Section at 1.75m away from face of capping beam (Hogging moment in the soild slab)
Section - 4
4. Section at 3.75m away from face of capping beam (Hogging moment in the soild slab)
Max. BM at face of capping beam (ULS) : 2140 kN-m

Max. BM at mid-span (ULS) : 651 kN-m
Max. BM at 1.75m away from face of capping beam (ULS) : 1273 kN-m
Max. BM at 3.75m away from face of capping beam (ULS) : 650 kN-m
Max. BM at face of capping beam (SLS-Stress check) : 1568 kN-m

Max. BM at mid-span (SLS-Stress check) : 428 kN-m
Max. BM at 1.75m away from face of capping beam (SLS-Stress check)
: 946 kN-m
Max. BM at 3.75m away from face of capping beam (SLS-Stress check)
: 490 kN-m
Max. BM at face of capping beam (SLS-Crack width check) : 768 kN-m

Max. BM at mid-span (SLS-Crack width check) : 412 kN-m
Max. BM at 1.75m away from face of capping beam (SLS-Crack width: check) 319 kN-m
Max. BM at 3.75m away from face of capping beam (SLS-Crack width: check) 50 kN-m
Following sections are checked for shear check:
Section - 5
Max. SF at face of capping beam (ULS) : 706 kN-m
Section - 6
Max. SF at 1.75m away from face of capping beam (ULS) : 482 kN-m
Section - 7
Section - 8

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
5.2 Design of section at face of capping beam (Largest hogging moment in the slab)
Section adequacy checks in flexure is carried out using Adsec computer program. Adsec
files are provided through e-mail/ CD for detailed reference.
Sectional properties & reinforcement layout
Material property - Concrete

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
Material property - Reinforcement

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
Check for ULS Strength

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
Check for SLS - Stress Checks
Check for SLS - Crack width checks

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
5.3 Design of section at mid span (Largest sagging moment in the slab)

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.


Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
5.4 Design of section at 1.75m away from face of capping beam (Hogging moment in the

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd. Document title Design of sub-structure & super-structure


Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
5.5 Design of section at 3.75m away from face of capping beam (Hogging moment in the soild slab)

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.

5.6 Calculation for shear reinforcement
#REF! Sec.5 Sec.6 Sec.7 Sec.8

ULS shear force in the section V ULS kN 706 482 394 319
Width of the section considered b mm 900 900 900 900
Effective depth of the section d mm 872 872 872 872
Lever arm of the section z mm 785 785 785 785
Strength reduction factor n1 0.839 0.839 0.839 0.839
Max. allowable shear 0.225 n 1 f ck b w z kN 6664 6664 6664 6664
O.K. O.K. O.K. O.K.
Angle of compressive strut q degree 45 45 45 45
2
Total tension reinforcement provided A st mm 5360 5360 5360 5360
Shear capacity - Without shear r/f V Rd,c kN 435 435 435 435
Calculate
Calculate
shear r/f
shear r/f
Provide
Provide
min. r/f
min. r/f
2
Required shear reinforcement mm 2069 1413 916 916
Dia. of shear r/f Y12 Y12 Y12 Y12
Number of legs 2L 2L 2L 2L
Spacing of shear r/f 150 150 300 300
Provided shear + + + +
reinforcement Dia. of shear r/f Y12 Y12 Y12 Y12
Number of legs 1L 1L 1L 1L
Spacing of shear r/f 150 150 300 300
2
A sw mm 2261.9 2261.9 1131 1131
O.K. O.K. O.K. O.K.

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
Data Ref.
6. Design of piles
6.1 Analysis results
Fig. 5.1 Bending moment diagram in ULS

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
Fig. 5.2 Bending moment diagram in SLS - Stress check

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
Fig. 5.3 Bending moment diagram in SLS - Crack width check

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
Fig. 5.4 Shear force diagram in ULS
Following sections are checked using adsec for flexure check:
Section - 1
1. Section at soffit of capping beam (Cut-off level)
Section - 2
2. Section at 4.4m below soffit of capping beam (Fixity level)
Section - 3
3. Section at 6.9m below soffit of capping beam (Curtailment level-I)
Section - 4
4. Section at 8.9m below soffit of capping beam (Curtailment level-II)
Max. BM at cut-off level (ULS) : 1775 kN-m

Max. BM at fixity level (ULS) : 1891 kN-m
Max. BM at curtailement level-I (ULS) : 1038 kN-m
Max. BM at curtailement level-II (ULS) : 531 kN-m
Max. BM at cut-off level (SLS-Stress check) : 1313 kN-m

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
Max. BM at fixity level (SLS-Stress check) : 1492 kN-m
Max. BM at curtailement level-I (SLS-Stress check) : 754 kN-m
Max. BM at curtailement level-II (SLS-Stress check) : 383 kN-m
Max. BM at cut-off level (SLS-Crack width check) : 857 kN-m

Max. BM at fixity level (SLS-Crack width check) : 387 kN-m
Max. BM at curtailement level-I (SLS-Crack width check) : 176 kN-m
Max. BM at curtailement level-II (SLS-Crack width check) : 127 kN-m
Following sections are checked for shear check:
Section - 5
Max. SF at 'd' distance from cut-off level : 1257 kN
Section - 6
Max. SF at 5.9m below cut-off level : 954 kN
Section - 7
Section - 8
6.2 Cut-off level
To be on conservative side, axial loads on pile for section check is taken corresponding to
dead load of superstructure and capping beam only.

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
6.3 Fixity level

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
6.4 Curtailment level - I

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
6.5 Curtailment level - II

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
6.6 Calculation for shear reinforcement
Section - 5
Diameter of shear reinforcement : 12 mm

Spacing of shear reinforcement : 150 mm C/C
2
Provided shear reinforcement : 1508 mm /m
Diameter of main reinforcement : 25 mm
No. of layers of reinforcement : 1
Diameter of circle through main r/f Ds : 1001 mm
Strength reduction factor n : 0.532

Design strength of reinforcement f ywd : 434.8 MPa
o
Shear stress for q = 45 0.225n *f ck : 4.19 Mpa
(Max. allowable)
o
Shear Stress for q = 21.8 0.155n *f ck : 2.89 MPa
Maximum shear force V Ed : 1257 kN
Corresponding vertical load P : 0 kN
Mean compressive stress s cp 0.0 MPa
Effective depth of section in shear de : 919 mm
(D/2 + D s / p )
Width of section bw : 1200 mm
Factor to determine shear resistance K : 1.47
0.5
Min of (1 + (200/d) ) & 2
Assuming 50% of r/f in tension r1 : 0.008
Shear strength of section without shear r/f : 530 kN
Applied shear force V Ed : 1257 kN
Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
Hence, Shear Reinforcement is Required. Calculate Area of Shear Reinf.
Applied shear stress v Ed : 1.27 MPa

Lever arm z : 826.8 mm
Design angle of compression strut q : 21.8 o
Coe. for stress in compression chord a CW : 1
Shear resistance of the member V RD,S : 1355 kN
Max. permissible shear resistance V RD,MAX : 2847 kN
O.K.
Minimum diameter of shear stirrups : 8 mm

Maximum spacing of shear stirrups : 150 mm
Section - 6

2

o
(Max. allowable)
o
(D/2 + D s / p )
0.5
Min of (1 + (200/d) ) & 2

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.

O.K.

Section - 7

2

o
(Max. allowable)
o
(D/2 + D s / p )
0.5
Min of (1 + (200/d) ) & 2

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
O.K.

Section - 8

2

o
(Max. allowable)
o
(D/2 + D s / p )
0.5
Min of (1 + (200/d) ) & 2

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
O.K.

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
Data Ref.
Annexure 1 : Calculation for soil springs
1.0 Part of GIR
Ground level below proposed road level : 0.6 m
2.0 Soil springs to be applied to MIDAS model
Subgrade Nodes in Soil spring to

Depth below Depth below
modulus in MIDAS below be applied in
GL FRL
GIR FRL MIDAS
2
m m kN/m m kN/m
1 1.6 167
2 2.6 333 2.15 232
3 3.6 500 3.54 882
4 4.6 10667 4.54 18102
5 5.6 13333 5.54 23712
6 6.6 16000 6.54 28512
7 7.6 18667 7.54 33312
8 8.6 80000 8.04 82176
9 9.6 90000 9.04 151920
10 10.6 100000 10.04 169920
11 11.6 110000 11.04 187920
12 12.6 120000 12.04 205920
13 13.6 130000 13.04 223920
14 14.6 140000 14.04 241920
Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.
15 15.6 150000 15.04 259920
Note : Soil springs to be applied in MIDAS are linearly interpolated from soil springs
given in GIR. Moreover, soil springs are obtained for contributory width of each node in
MIDAS.
design report for santacruz bridge H V Construction
Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.

Data Ref.
Annexure 2 : Calculation for minimum reinforcement requirement
1.0 Minimum tension reinforcement requirement in solid slab

Clause
16.5.1 of
Mean width of tension zone per meter bt : 1000 mm
IRC:112
Effective depth of the section d : 874 mm
Mean axial tensile strength of concrete f ctm : 3.52MPa
Characterstic strength of reinforcement f yk : 500 MPa
2
Calculate - 0.26 x f ctm / f yk b t d A s,min,1 : 1598 mm
2
Calculate - 0.0013 b t d A s,min,2 : 1136 mm
2
Minimum reinforcement required A s,min : 1598 mm
Provided reinforcement A s,provided : 6.67nos. Y 20
+ 0nos. Y 20
2
: 2094 mm
O.K.
syntegrity consulting pvt ltd

design report for santacruz bridge H V Construction
Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.

#### Minimum tension reinforcement requirement in capping beams
Mean width of tension zone per meter : 1575 mm

Effective depth of the section : 2059 mm
Mean axial tensile strength of concrete f ctm : 3.52MPa
Characterstic strength of reinforcement f yk : 500 MPa
2
Calculate - 0.26 x f ctm / f yk b t d A s,min,1 : 5928 mm
2
Calculate - 0.0013 b t d A s,min,2 : 4216 mm
2
Minimum reinforcement required A s,min : 5928 mm
Provided reinforcement A s,provided : 11nos. Y 32
+ 0nos. Y 20
2
: 8847 mm
O.K.
#### Calculation for surface reinforcement in capping beam
Clear cover to any reinforcement : 75 mm

2
Area of cover portion outside stirrups : 75000 mm /m
2
Area of surface reinforcement : 750 mm /m
Provided reinforcement A s,provided : Y 12 @
150mm C/C
2
: 754 mm /m
O.K.

Consulting
Syntegrity
Pvt. Ltd.

Data Ref.
Annexure 3 : Calculation for confinement reinforcement in piles
1.0 Piles at abutment location - A1 Clause

17.2.1.1
Design axial force (ULS) : 852 kN of IRC-
Pile diameter D : 1.2 m 112
2
Cross-sectional area of piles : 1.131 m
Grade of concrete : M35
Design compressive strength of concrete f cd : 15.6 MPa
Design yield strength of steel f yd : 434.8 MPa
Normalised axial force nk : 0.0215 Eq. 17.1
< 0.08
Hence, there is no probabily of hinge formation in secant piles. Thereby, no confining r/f is
required in secant piles.

20191118-Design Report

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

20191118-Design Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

design report for santcruz bridge HV constructions

2. Sectional properties & Span configuration

4. Load and Load combinations

5. Design of solid slab

Annexure 1 : Calculation for soil springs

Annexure 2 : Calculation for minimum reinforcement requirement

Annexure 3 : Calculation for confinement reinforcement in piles

syntegrity consulting pvt. ltd.

Document title Design of sub-structure & super-structure

syntegrity consulting pvt. ltd.

1.1 Project description

1.2 Bridge description

Bridge orientation = east-west on Juhu Tara Road near SNDT college at

The existing bridge shall be demolished.

syntegrity consulting pvt.ltd.

Document title Design of sub-structure & super-structure

syntegrity consulting pvt.ltd.

2. Sectional properties & Span configuration

2.1 Plan, Elevation & Cross-sections

Fig. 2.1 : Plan of the bridge

syntergrity consultant pvt. ltd.

Fig. 2.2 : Elevation of the bridge

Fig. 2.3 : Typical cross-section at mid-span

syntergrity consultant pvt. ltd.

Fig. 2.4 : Typical cross-section at end-span

2.2 Span configuration/ Cross sectional details

Clear width of bridge at nallah : 15.4 m

Bridge alignment : Straight

Clear cover to any reinforcement - Solid slab : 50 mm

Thickness of solid slab : 950 mm

Width of capping beam : 1575 mm

syntergrity consultant pvt. ltd.

2.3 Structural idealization - MIDAS Model

Fig. 2.5 : 3-D space frame

syntergrity consultant pvt. ltd.

Fig. 2.6 : Rendered view of

syntergrity consultant pvt. ltd.

syntergrity consultant pvt. ltd.

Document title Design of sub-structure & super-structure

Fig. 2.7 : Soil spring support to

syntergrity consultant pvt. ltd.

3.1 Concrete properties

Solid slab & capping beam

Grade of concrete - Solid slab : M50

Grade of concrete - Hard piles considered only for design : M35

3.2 Reinforcement steel properties

Grade of reinforcement : Fe-500D Table

syntegrity consultant pvt. ltd.

syntegrity consultant pvt. ltd.

4. Load and Load combinations

4.1 Basic loads

4.1.1 Dead loads

Dead load of the entire structure is considered corresponding to cross-sectional properties

4.1.2 Super-imposed dead load

Weight of crash barrier : 7 kN/m

Thickness of PCC over footpath : 700 mm

Wearing course per unit area : 2 kN/m 2

4.1.3 Vehicular live load

Width of carriage-way : 11.5 m Table 6

Description of Class A loading Fig. 2

syntegrity consultants pvt ltd

Description of Class 70R loading (Wheel) Fig. 1

Description of Class 70R loading (Track)