Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SUBJECT: Evolution
year
The experiment used water (H2O), methane (CH4), ammonia
(NH3), and hydrogen (H2). The chemicals were all sealed inside
a sterile array of glass flasks and flasks connected in a loop,
with one flask half-full of liquid water and another flask
containing a pair of electrodes. The liquid water was heated to
induce evaporation, sparks were fired between the electrodes
to simulate lightning through the atmosphere and water vapor,
and then the atmosphere was cooled again so that the water
could condense and trickle back into the first flask in a
continuous cycle.
• Within a day, the mixture had turned pink in color, and at the
end of two weeks of continuous operation, Miller and Urey
observed that as much as 10–15% of the carbon within the
system was now in the form of organic compounds. Two
percent of the carbon had formed amino acids that are used to
make proteins in living cells, with glycine as the most abundant.
Sugars were also formed. Nucleic acids were not formed within
the reaction. 18% of the methane-molecules became bio-
molecules. The rest turned into hydrocarbons like bitumen.
With these results, the theory of gradual chemical evolution
was accepted. This experiment gave the other scientists to
piece the remaining pieces together.
DRAWBACKS OF UREY MILLER EXPERIMENT
• By examining rocks ―dated‖ to be 3.7 billion years old,
geologists determined that earth had an oxygenic atmosphere.
• Oxygen is an ―oxidizing‖ agent and would inhibit chemical
evolution.
• Experiment produced a mixture of right-handed & left-
handed amino acids, but in nature left-handed ones
predominate.
• Now it is thought that the atmosphere of the early earth was
not rich in methane and ammonia — essential ingredients in
Miller's experiments.
References:
1. https://www.slideshare.net/nasirshaikh5/origin-and-
evolution-of-life
2. https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https%3A%2F
%2Fslideplayer.com%2Fslide
%2F16478409%2F96%2Fimages%2F5%2FTheories%2Bfor
%2Bthe%2Borigin%2Bof%2Blife.jpg&imgrefurl=https%3A
%2F%2Fslideplayer.com%2Fslide
%2F16478409%2F&tbnid=GtJqv8XL4cZVYM&vet=12ahUKE
wiw99P8h-
TvAhWH04UKHeYoAO4QMygIegUIARDcAQ..i&docid=7mB
P7YQXvAeYnM&w=1024&h=768&q=theory%20of
%20origin%20of%20life&hl=en-
US&ved=2ahUKEwiw99P8h-
TvAhWH04UKHeYoAO4QMygIegUIARDcAQ
3. https://www.toppr.com/guides/biology/evolution/theorie
s-of-origin-and-evolution-of-life/
4. http://www.astro.sunysb.edu/lattimer/AST248/lecture_13
.pdf
5. https://lweb.cfa.harvard.edu/~ejchaisson/cosmic_evolutio
n/docs/text/text_chem_2.html#:~:text=A%20third
%20theory%20of%20life's,chemicals%20needed%20to
%20produce%20life.&text=This%20modern%20theory
%20then%20suggests,slow%20evolution%20of
%20nonliving%20matter.
6. https://line.17qq.com/articles/heoipbhdz.html