Professional Documents
Culture Documents
89
ABSTRACT
DEFINITION OF FLOODING
The term flooding has often been used in the literature to describe the
unsatisfactory operation of an agitator in a gas-liquid system. The term
loading has also frequently been used as representing the normal operating
state of the system.
In the literature several accounts can be found that allow prediction of
the transitions between loaded and flooded conditions.
However in fact there is significant confusion as to the nomenclature, and
indeed not all authors distinguish adequately between the alternative states.
The result is that correlations often appear to given conflicting
predictions and the results of the various authors are difficult to
reconcile.
THEORETICAL CONTEMPLATION
vertical flow to dominate even when the radial velocity components exceed
the corresponding free rise velocity of the bubbles.
It seems evident to the present authors that the balance between these
vertical and radial velocities must be considered.
The pumping action of the impeller is commonly expressed in terms of
Q p = C p ND 3 (1)
where Cp is a proportionality constant dependent on the system.
The potential axial liquid flow introduced by the buoyancy effects of the
bubbles can be estimated if the conditions in the vicinity of a flooded
impeller are considered to have similarities to those near an unconstrained
bubble column. For such bubble columns Goossens [5] and Smith et al. [Il]
have presented a relation derived from the hydrodynamic balance equations,
describing the liquid volume rate brought to the surface,Q«w, by the action
of a rising bubble column
Q
AX
= C
— S b (2)
Q g .g.H b b
where C. = constant
b
3
Q = gas flow rate (m /s)
H = height of the bubble column (m)
2
g = gravitational constant (m/s )
At the flooding transition in a stirred tank the magnitudes of the radial
and axial liquid flows can be expected to be the same order:
% ~- <W (3)
With equations (1) and (2) this results in:
Q g .g.H 5 - N 3 D 9 (4)
Assuming that the height of the bubble column in a vessel with a flooded-
impeller is proportional to the stirrer diameter and rearranging the
variables of equation 4 gives:
(5)
V*r
This result means that the flooding transition should be described by a
linear relation between the gas flow number Fl and the impeller Froude
number Fr.
A similar relation has been derived by Biesecker[2] who considered the
power balance between the bubble flow and the s tirrer.
It must be noted here that the equations are developed for a constant
T/D-ratio. The influence of this ratio is present in the pumping rate
constant of equation 1. However no reliable relations are available
concerning the influence of T/D on the pumping capacity of an impeller in
gas-liquid systems. On the other hand it seems from literature that the
influence of T/D on the flooding transition is considerable.
61
Symposium Series No. 89
EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUE
The experiments have been performed in mixing tanks of standard geometry,
using tank diameters of 0.44, 0.64 and 1.20 m filled to a denth H equal
to the tank diameter T. In all cases the T/D rato for the 6-blade Rushton
turbines was 2.5. The vessels were fitted with the usual four 0.1 T width
baffles, fig. 3. The clearance between the stirrer Diane and the vessel
bottom was in all cases equal to the stirrer diameter. All measurements
were made in the air-water system, with air supplied from a ring sparger
mounted below the stirrer.
The transition between impeller loading and flooding can be detected in
different ways. The most simple technique is visual observation of the
bulk flow. However, this method is subjective and limited to transparent
vessels. Mikulcova et al .[7] detected the presence of bubbles in the radial
outflow with a conductivety probe. In this study the technique of Roustan
[101 has been applied. This method is based on qualitative determination of
the liquid radial outflow vector near the impeller by a micro propeller.
This propeller produces a signal that is proportional to its rotational
speed. The propeller was placed near the stirrer to produce an optimal
signal.
Fig. 4 shows an example of the measured signals.
When there is no gas, Qg = 0, then the signal from the propeller increases
linearly with the stirrer speed N. At a constant gas flow rate with an
increasing stirrer speed the signal stays on a lower level as long as the
impeller is flooded. As the impeller begins to pump radially, the propeller
signal starts to increase rapidly. The stirrer speed and gas flow rate at
which this transition occurs correspond unambiguously to the flooding
transition.
Experimentswith both increasing and decreasing stirrer speeds showed that
hysteresis is negligible. This was also reported by Dickey [4] , though
other authors, for example Roustan [ 10], do not agree.
EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS- AND DISCUSSION
Figure 7. The only apparent reason for this is the fact that Roustan dis
tributed the gas into his vessel through a perforated bottom.
Figure 7 also compares the results of other authors with this study. The
various correlations have been presented in terms of the stirrer speed and
maximum gas flow rate for the 0.44 m vessel.
The results of Nienowet al.[8 lare more or less separated from the other
data. This is a result of his use of somewhat different definition for
flooding.
Nienow's curve related flooding to the d i s t r i b u t i o n of gas throughout the
mixing vessel as a whole, f i g . lc w h i l s t the lower curves due to Dickey
[ 4 ] , Bruxelmane [ 3 ] , Judat [ 6 ] and ourselves r e s t r i c t consideration of the
flooding phenomenon to the immediate v i c i n i t y of the impeller, f i g la and
lb.
It is therefore concluded that the introduction of a precise definition for
flooding such as that suggested here is meaningful.
From figure 7 it is obvious that equation 6 predicts the largest gas flow
rate before flooding occurs.
Further study is necessary to determine whether the sparger geometry is
indeed responsible for these deviations.
CONCLUSIONS
A precise definition of flooding in a stirred gas liquid dispersion is
indispensable for describing this phenomenon quantitatively.
For the impeller flooding transition a linear relation between Fl and Fr
could be derived by comparison of the radial liquid flow due to the pumoing
action of the stirrer and the axial flow induced by a bubble column.
Experiments have shown that this relation can be described as
Fl = 1.2 Fr
The values of the gas flow number at flooding transition from this study
are higher than others reported in the literature.
SYMBOLS USED
constant in equation 2
constant in equation 1
DP stirrer diameter ^
Fl gas flow number (= Q/ND )
Fr Froude number (= N^D/g)
g gravitational constant m / s 2)
H height of the bubble column
N stirrer speed «·>
T vessel diameter
QAX Axial liquid flow m3/s)
Gas flow rate m3/s)
Qg
impeller pumping capacity m3
/s)
Qn
63
Symposium Series No. 89
LITERATURE CITED
1. Bimbinet, J.J., M.S. Thesis, Purdue University, Lafayette, USA 1959.
2. Biesecker, B.O., VDI-Forschungsheft 554, (1972).
3. Bruxelmane, M.Z.A., Proc. Int. Symp. on Mixing, Mons, (1978), paper XC-1.
4. Dickey, D.S., 72nd Annual Meeting Am. Inst. Chem. Engrs., San Francisco,
(1979), paper 116 d.
5. Goossens, L.H.J., PhD-Thesis Delft Unviversity of Technology, (1979).
6. Judat, H., Fortschritte der Verfahrenstechnik, (1977), 141.
7. Mikulcovâ, E., Kudrna, V. and Vlcek, J., Scientific papers of the Inst.
of Chem. Techn., Prague, Kl, (1967, 167. (in Czech).
8. Nienow, A.W., Wisdom, D.J. and Middleton, J.C., Proc. 2nd European Conf.
on Mixing, Cambridge, (1977), paper Fl.
9. Pollard, J., Proc. Int. Symp. on Mixing, Mons, (1978), paper C-4.
10. Roustan, M. and Bruxelmane, M.Z.A., CHISA, Prague, (1981), paner B 3.3.
11. Smith, J.M. and Goossens, L.H.J. Proc. 4th Euron. Conf. on Mixing,
Leeuwenhorst, The Netherlands, (1982), paper C2.
12. Westerterp, K.R. , van Dierendonck, L.L. and De Kraa, J.A., Chem. Eng.
Sci., 18, (1963), 157.
13. ZwieterTng, Th.N., De Ingenieur, 7i5, (1963), Ch 60. (in Dutch).
64
Symposium Series No. 89
__
1
/
/
1
1
1
1
1 \ 1—1 ι—ι
\ \
1
/
(a) (b) (c)
F i g . 1. Floodinn and loadinq regimes.
(a) (b)
F i g . 2. Loadinn regimes f o r d i f f e r e n t T / D - r a t i o s .
motor
data
processing ffi torque
meter
B-U-S Γ
F i g . 3. Experimental set-un.
65
Symposium Series No. 89
06 .__ " T -
—» 0
> / T :0 4 4 m
3
- "<- / o Qg= O m / s -
A 3
= / Δ Qg= 6 24 10" m /s
S- /
o / --1
0.4
Uo
K /
f / .
/
/
0.2 L lΓ/ o
Flooding
transition
Δ/
/
/
Δ
o Δ
\
/
/
/ _Δ
_L ' ■ i
1
NO^'
» 5 · »
o T : AAm
Δ T s 6«m
♦ T=12 m
*Λ F " m a x « ' 2 F r m in
♦ ^ *
-<*?)
F i g . 5. Experimental r e s u l t s .
66
Symposium Series No. 89
Q G (10- 3 m 3 /s)
0' ' 1 ' 1 ' 1 ' L
0 2 4 6 8
Fig. 7. Comparison of the results with
other literature data.
67