Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BUSINESS MANAGEMENT
THE CUSTOMER PERCEPTION TOWARDS NESTLE MAGGI
PRESENTED BY:
AKSHAT CHAUHAN
DIPTI KUMARI
HRITWAJ KULSHRESHTHA
KHUSHBOO SINGH
DECLARATION
This is to certify that the material embodied in this study is entitled “The
Customer Perception Towards Maggi” is based on team research work and our
indebtedness to other work/publication has been acknowledge at the relevant
place.
(Team Members)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We take this opportunity to express our profound gratitude and deep regard to
our mentor Dr. Nilesh Kate, professor, Pune Institute of Business Management
for his exemplary guidance, monitoring and constant encouragement throughout
this project. The blessing, help and guidance given by his time to time shall carry
us a long journey of life on which we are about to embark.
Table of Contents
ABSTRACT............................................................................................................................................5
INTRODUCTION:..................................................................................................................................5
BACKGROUND......................................................................................................................................5
MAGGI NOODLES IN INDIAN MARKET...............................................................................................6
OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY.................................................................................................................6
RESEARCH VARAIBLES.......................................................................................................................6
RESEARCH GAP....................................................................................................................................7
RESEARCH DESIGN..............................................................................................................................7
DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION..........................................................................................8
FINDINGS............................................................................................................................................20
LIMITATIONS.....................................................................................................................................21
CONCLUSION......................................................................................................................................21
ABSTRACT
Consumer behaviour refers to the behaviour that consumers display in searching
for purchasing, using, evaluating and disposing of products and services that they
expect, will satisfy their need. Consumers are highly complex individuals subject
to a variety of psychological and sociological needs apart from their survival
needs. Needs and priorities of different consumer segments differ drastically.
This study analyses the brand preference of Nestle Maggi noodles by consumers.
The study evaluates the quality of nestle Maggi noodles availed by consumers,
the media influences in consumption, the effect of the pricing policy in customer
satisfaction. This study attempts to measure customer satisfaction as well as
contributing to the commercial efficiency by the way of suggestions to improve
its profitability in a long-term business.
INTRODUCTION:
Quick food styles are catching up fast because of a greater number of working
couples, domestic fuel crisis, non-availability of reliable domestic servants and
breaking up of joint family system. Neither time nor patience to prepare the
ingredients and wholesome food in the house itself, the high price of ingredients
and ready mix are also a significant factor responsible for the spectacular
increase in the demand for Maggi noodles products.
BACKGROUND
RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS
RESEARCH VARAIBLES
INDEPENDENT VARIABLE DEPENDENT VARIABLE
Health of Consumers Purchase Decision of Maggi
RESEARCH GAP
1. The present study is the first of its kind in India to determine the
perception of the consumers towards a particular brand and Its impact on
the Health of Customers.
2. The studies done not only focused on a particular brand but the motive of
this Study is to understand the quality aspects of different brands also.
3. In this study we not only focus on a particular factor that is health but we
also understand various factors in regards to Maggi that affects the
behaviour of a consumer.
4. This Study also focus on the current news related to Nestle that most of
the products are not fit or not healthy for human consumption.
RESEARCH DESIGN
∞ RESEARCH TYPE-
The research is on descriptive basis.
∞ SAMPLE AREA-
The sample region chosen was Bareilly, Delhi, Noida.
∞ SAMPLE SIZE
91
∞ DATA COLLECTED-
Researcher had collected Primary Data as well as Secondary Data.
∞ SAMPLING METHOD-
Researcher opted convenience sampling. Convenience sampling is a
non-probability sampling technique where subjects are selected
because of their convenient accessibility and proximity to the
researcher.
Gender
60
50
Total
40
30
20
10
0
Female Male
INTERPRETATION- 1
Researcher depicted that from above chart, out of 100%(n=91) respondents, n=52 is
Male and n=39 is Female.
Q2. Age Of the Applicant
Age
60
50
40
Total
30
20
10
0
15-25 26 -35 36-45 46-65 above 65 Below 15
INTERPRETATION- 2
Researcher depicted that from above chart, out of 100%(n=91) respondents, n=52 falls
under 15-25, n=22 falls under 26-35, n=8 falls under 36-45, n=4 falls under 46-65, n=1
is above 65 and n=4, are below 15.
Q3. Income of the Applicant.
Income
40
35
30
25 Total
20
15
10
0
<10,000 >50,001 10,001-20,000 20,001-30,000 30,001-40,000 40,001-50,000
INTERPRETATION- 3
Researcher depicted that from above chart, out of 100%(n=91) respondents, n=37
having an income of less than 10000, n=20 falls under 10001-20000, n=12 falls under
20001-30000, n=11 falls under 30001-40000 and n=8, falls under 40001-50000.
Q4. Consumption Habit.
Consumption
30
25
20
Total
15
10
0
Everyday Not prefer Once a Once a Six Once a Thrice a Twice a
to eat month month week week week
INTERPRETATION- 4
Researcher depicted that from above chart, out of 100%(n=91) respondents, n=5 use to
consume maggi every day, n=15 use to consume once a month, n=6 use to consume
once a six-month, n=23 use to consume once a week, n=11 use to consume thrice a week
and n=27 use to consume twice a week.
Q7. New Variants
New Variants
60
50
Total
40
30
20
10
0
No Yes
INTERPRETATION- 7
Researcher depicted that from above chart, out of 100%(n=91) respondents, n=59 tried
the new variants of Nestle Maggi and n=32 not yet tried the new variants.
Pricing
60
50
40 Total
30
20
10
0
Over Priced Perfect Price Under Priced
INTERPRETATION- 10
Researcher depicted that from above chart, out of 100%(n=91) respondents, n=58
thinks that Maggi is perfectly Priced and n=8 thinks that Maggi is Over Priced.
Q11. Side Effects.
Side Effects
50
45
40
Total
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
No Yes
INTERPRETATION- 11
Researcher depicted that from above chart, out of 100%(n=91) respondents, n=50 have
no side effects on their Body and n=41 face some side effects on their body.
30
25
20
Total
15
10
0
1 2 3 4 5
INTERPRETATION- 12.A.
Researcher depicted that from above chart, out of 100%(n=91) respondents, n=30 rate
Patanjali Quality as 1, n=23 rate it 2, n=12 rate it 3, n=9 rate it 4 and n=17 rate quality as
5.
Q12.B. Quality of Yippie.
35
30
25
Total
20
15
10
0
1 2 3 4 5
INTERPRETATION- 12.B.
Researcher depicted that from above chart, out of 100%(n=91) respondents, n=9 rate
Yippie Quality as 1, n=23 rate it 2, n=35 rate it 3, n=10 rate it 4 and n=14 rate quality as
5.
30
25
20
Total
15
10
0
1 2 3 4 5
INTERPRETATION- 12.C.
Researcher depicted that from above chart, out of 100%(n=91) respondents, n=20 rate
Yippie Quality as 1, n=22 rate it 2, n=28 rate it 3, n=14 rate it 4 and n=7 rate quality as 5.
Q.12. D. Quality of Ching’s.
100
90
80
70
60 Total
50
40
30
20
10
0
1 2 3 4 5
INTERPRETATION- 12.D.
Researcher depicted that from above chart, out of 100%(n=91) respondents, n=10 rate
Yippie Quality as 1, n=34 rate it 2, n=93 rate it 3, n=96 rate it 4 and n=45 rate quality as
5.
40
35
30
25 Total
20
15
10
0
1 2 3 4 5
INTERPRETATION- 12.E.
Researcher depicted that from above chart, out of 100%(n=91) respondents, n=12 rate
Yippie Quality as 1, n=13 rate it 2, n=36 rate it 3, n=20 rate it 4 and n=10 rate quality as
5.
Q12. F. Quality of Knorr.
35
30
25
Total
20
15
10
0
1 2 3 4 5
INTERPRETATION- 12.F.
Researcher depicted that from above chart, out of 100%(n=91) respondents, n=9 rate
Yippie Quality as 1, n=25 rate it 2, n=35 rate it 3, n=16 rate it 4 and n=6 rate quality as 5.
30
25
20
Total
15
10
0
1 2 3 4 5
INTERPRETATION- 12.G.
Researcher depicted that from above chart, out of 100%(n=91) respondents, n=16 rate
Yippie Quality as 1, n=26 rate it 2, n=29 rate it 3, n=16 rate it 4 and n=4 rate quality as 5.
Factor analysis is a method of data reduction. It does this by seeking underlying
unobservable variables that are reflected in the observed variables. Factor
analysis is a technique that requires a large sample size. Factor analysis is based
on the correlation matrix of the variables involved, and correlations usually need
a large sample size before they stabilize.
Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity – This test the null hypothesis that the correlation
matrix is an identity matrix. An identity matrix is matrix in which all of the
diagonal elements are 1 and all off diagonal elements are 0.
INITIAL EIGENVALUES
Component Total % Of Variance Cumulative %
1 4.563 45.631 45.631
2 1.389 13.891 59.522
3 1.003 10.030 69.552
Availability
FACTOR LABELLING
Factor Name Attributes 1 Attributes 2 Attributes 3
Peculiarity Quality Taste Preference Availability
Awareness Media Price
Advertisement
Instant Instant Food
AWARENESS VS INSTANT
0.9
0.79
0.73 0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.28
0.3
0.2 0.14
0.1 0.07
0
-0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
INSTANT VS AWARENESS
0.9
0.79
0.8 0.73
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.28
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
-0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
After performing Factor analysis on the data collected, 3 factors were identified
which cumulatively represented of the total variance. These factors are labelled
as Peculiarity, Awareness and Instant
T-TEST
In a One Sample t Test, the test variable's mean is compared against a "test
value", which is a known or hypothesized value of the mean in the
population. Test values may come from a literature review, a trusted
research organization, legal requirements, or industry standards
ONE-SAMPLE STATISTICS
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean
ONE-SAMPLE TEST
Test Value = 0
t df Sig. (2- Mean 95% Confidence Interval
tailed) Difference of the Difference
Lower Upper
Healt 21.404 90 .000 3.110 2.82 3.40
h
1. Test Value: The number we entered as the test value in the One-Sample T
Test window.
2. t Statistic: The test statistic of the one-sample t test, denoted t.
3. df: The degrees of freedom for the test.
4. Sig. (2-tailed): The two-tailed p-value corresponding to the test statistic.
5. Mean Difference: The difference between the "observed" sample mean (from
the One Sample Statistics box) and the "expected" mean (the specified test
value (A)). The sign of the mean difference corresponds to the sign of
the t value (B).
It is Observed from the test that P value is 0.000 and it is less than 0.05 and hence
it can be concluded that Null Hypothesis is rejected and Alternative Hypothesis is
Accepted.
FINDINGS
1. Researcher depicted that from above chart, out of 100%(n=91) respondents, n=52 is
Male and n=39 is Female.
2. Researcher depicted that from above chart, out of 100%(n=91) respondents, n=52
falls under 15-25, n=22 falls under 26-35, n=8 falls under 36-45, n=4 falls under 46-
65, n=1 is above 65 and n=4, are below 15.
3. Researcher depicted that from above chart, out of 100%(n=91) respondents, n=37
having an income of less than 10000, n=20 falls under 10001-20000, n=12 falls
under 20001-30000, n=11 falls under 30001-40000 and n=8, falls under 40001-
50000
4. Researcher depicted that from above chart, out of 100%(n=91) respondents, n=5
use to consume maggi every day, n=15 use to consume once a month, n=6 use to
consume once a six-month, n=23 use to consume once a week, n=11 use to consume
thrice a week and n=27 use to consume twice a week.
5. Researcher depicted that from above chart, out of 100%(n=91) respondents, n=59
tried the new variants of Nestle Maggi and n=32 not yet tried the new variants.
6. Researcher depicted that from above chart, out of 100%(n=91) respondents, n=58
thinks that Maggi is perfectly Priced and n=8 thinks that Maggi is Over Priced.
7. Researcher depicted that from above chart, out of 100%(n=91) respondents, n=50
have no side effects on their Body and n=41 face some side effects on their body.
8. Researcher depicted that from above chart, out of 100%(n=91) respondents, n=30
rate Patanjali Quality as 1, n=23 rate it 2, n=12 rate it 3, n=9 rate it 4 and n=17 rate
quality as 5.
9. Researcher depicted that from above chart, out of 100%(n=91) respondents, n=9
rate Yippie Quality as 1, n=23 rate it 2, n=35 rate it 3, n=10 rate it 4 and n=14 rate
quality as 5.
10. Researcher depicted that from above chart, out of 100%(n=91) respondents, n=20
rate Yippie Quality as 1, n=22 rate it 2, n=28 rate it 3, n=14 rate it 4 and n=7 rate
quality as 5.
11. Researcher depicted that from above chart, out of 100%(n=91) respondents, n=10
rate Yippie Quality as 1, n=34 rate it 2, n=93 rate it 3, n=96 rate it 4 and n=45 rate
quality as 5.
12. Researcher depicted that from above chart, out of 100%(n=91) respondents, n=12
rate Yippie Quality as 1, n=13 rate it 2, n=36 rate it 3, n=20 rate it 4 and n=10 rate
quality as 5.
13. Researcher depicted that from above chart, out of 100%(n=91) respondents, n=9
rate Yippie Quality as 1, n=25 rate it 2, n=35 rate it 3, n=16 rate it 4 and n=6 rate
quality as 5.
14. Researcher depicted that from above chart, out of 100%(n=91) respondents, n=16
rate Yippie Quality as 1, n=26 rate it 2, n=29 rate it 3, n=16 rate it 4 and n=4 rate
quality as 5.
15. After performing Factor analysis on the data collected, 3 factors were
identified which cumulatively represented of the total variance. These factors
are labelled as Peculiarity, Awareness and Instant.
16.There is a significant relationship between Health of consumer and purchase
decision of Maggi.
LIMITATIONS
The sample size is small and the study is restricted to Delhi, Bareilly and Noida
residents only. Further research can be done by increasing the sample size and
undertaking a countrywide study. Moreover, consumer perception and buying
behaviour can be analysed.
CONCLUSION
As we know that the food processing business in India is at a nascent stage.
Currently, only about 10% of the output is processed and consumed in packaged
form thus highlighting huge potential for expansion and growth.
So, although the time is changing but one must not only focus on the taste but
also on other things such as whether the food that we are consuming is good for
our health or not.
So, as a market leader in the Noodles segment maggi must not only focus on taste
but it must also provide packaged food that is healthy and fit for human
consumption.