Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. Facebook India
Through its country head
Ms. Kirthiga Reddy
Office at : 4th Floor, Building-14, OPUS Towers, Mindspace, Cyberabad,
APIIC SW Unit Layout, Madhapur, Hyderabad-500081
kirthiga@fb.com
07799021 119
2. FaceBook
Through its chairman
Donald Edward Graham
Facebook Corporate Office 1601 S. California Ave. Palo Alto, CA 94304
3. Google India (P) Ltd.
4. Orkut
5. Youtube
6. Blogspot
Through its Country head
Shri Rajan Anandan
8th and 9th Floors, Tower -- C, Building No.8, DLF Cyber City, Gurgacn - 122
002
7. Google
8. Youtube
9. Blogspot
10. Orkut
Through its CEO,
Larry Page - CEO
1600, Amphitheatre, Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA
11. Yahoo India (P) Ltd.
Shri Arun Tadanki
Building No. 8, Tower-C, DLF Cyber City Phase-2, Gurgaon
12. Yahoo
Roy J. Bostock - Chairman
Yahoo! Inc.701 1st Ave., Sunnyvale, CA 94089
13. Microsoft India (P) Ltd.
Shri Bhaskar Pramanik
7th Floor, Cyber Green Tower-A.
DLF Cyber City, Phase-3 Gurgaon-122002
14. Microsoft
Through Steve Ballmer - CEO Microsoft Corporation
One Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA 98052-7329 USA
15. Zombie Time
16. Exboii [sic]
17. Boardreader
18. IMC India
19. My Lot
20. Shyni Blog
21. Topix
...Accused
P.S. Tuglak Road
Complaint Under Section 200 Read With Section 156 (3) Of the Code of
Criminal Procedure For Registration of FIR Under Section 153 (A), 153(B),
292, 293, 295(A), 298, 109, 500 and 120 B of the INDIAN PENAL CODE.
THE COMPLAINANT MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:
1. That the complainant is a law abiding citizen of India. The Complainant is
a resident of above stated address.
2. The complainant before this Hon'ble Court is a senior journalist and editor
of Akbari, an Urdu weekly.
3. That the complainant is moving to this Court as a citizen of India, not only
in public interest but also as an affected person who believes in a secular
India.
4. The accused persons are the publishers and service provider of the
electronic contents and also responsible to manage and control online site
and internet contents, who ever used and post the material on the site
through internet.
5. That the complainant wishes to draw the attention of this Hon'ble Court to
certain content hosted on various websites, which are per-se inflammatory,
unacceptable by any set of community standards; seeks to create enmity,
hatred and communal Violence amongst various religious communities; is
demeaning, degrading and obscene, and will corrupt minds and will seriously
affect religious sentiments . It is submitted that complainant had received
some information about these type contents and material posted on the social
site as well as sites of the above named accused and thereafter the
complainant in his office at the above mentioned address while going through
the contents of the above said websites realized that the same were
unacceptable to the secular fabric provided by the constitution of India and
would be intolerable to any community or religion.
6. That even on a bare perusal of the content it is clear that the same will
certainly corrupt young minds below the age of 18 years is highly provocative
and which may lead to illogical and dangerous consequences. It is humbly
submitted that these contents prima facie appears to be dangerous for the
society and communal harmony.
7. That such content, if allowed to be hosted on these websites would
seriously damage the secular fabric of India and would severely hurt the
sentiment of general public following different religions. Following are the
websites which host the said objectionable content as provided to the Hon'ble
court in a sealed envelope: 1.Facebook, 2.Youtube, 3. Google
4.Yahoo,5.0rkut, 6.Broadreader, 7. Mylot, 8.Zombie Time, 9.Shyni Blog,
10.Blogspot, 11.Exbii.com, 12.IMC India
8. That the accused persons are Social Networking Websites and their
Directors, Agents with their addresses provided as per the memo of parties.
9. The Social Networking Websites are only for providing the educational,
historical, research and entertainment work etc. as part of their commercial
activities meaning thereby that the functions and informations which are
regarding the welfare, development and entertainment of the society.
10. That on perusal of the same it has been found that presently there are so
many objectionable materials available on these social networking websites
which may lead to communal riots. It seems that the government authorities
have turned a blind eye to the same and does not have any established
measures or rules and guidelines to control and regulate the same. On the
bare perusal of all these contents it is more than evident that the government
is least bothered and as usual waiting for some dangerous consequences to
happen before taking some appropriate actions . It is submitted that the
neither police official nor the government had initiated any action to
curve/check these activities sou moto and failed to registered any .case
against the above named accused persons in any manner whatsoever under
any law prevailing at present point of time and corrective measures against
the said websites and the concerned officials.
11. That the main social networking websites are Google, Facebook, Youtube,
Orkut, Broadreader, Mylot, Zomie Time, Shyni Blog, Blogspot, Exbii.com, IMC
India. These accused persons knowingly well these facts that these contents
and materials are most dangerous for the community and peace of the
harmony, but with common and malfide intention and hands under glove with
each other failed to remove the same for the wrongful gain.
12. That the complainant is filing this complaint against the Directors, Agents,
Officials, Representatives and Employees of all the said Social Networking
Websites for having committed the offences under Section 153 (A), 153(B),
292, 293, 295(A), 298 and 500 of the IPC, which this hon'ble court will
appreciate even on a bare glance of the contents provided in the sealed
cover. The same is being provided to this hon'ble court in a sealed cover
understanding my social responsibility not to publicize the offensive and
inflammatory material which may lead to communal disharmony.
13. That the nature of the content hosted on each of these websites are ex-
facie scurrilous, defamatory, prejudicial to the maintenance of harmony
between different religions and communities, likely to cause fear and
generate a feeling of insecurity amongst members of religious communities,
obscene by any criteria of community standards of obscenity, seeks to
corrupt young minds, malicious and insulting to religions and religious beliefs
of certain communities and is intended to wound the religious feelings of
persons and under no stretch of imagination be considered to be under
freedom of speech and expression . The contents hosted on the websites are
annexed to this complaint in a sealed cover as Annexure - A.
14. That Perusal of the content will lead to the conclusion that the same is
per-se unacceptable. It is humbly submitted that the contents of the site are
clearly established the offences punishable under provisions mentioned in the
above and if the action will taken against the accused person the same will be
caused serious prejudice to our society and social value provided and
protected under constitution of India.
15. That as a member of the community, The complainant is not only
individually hurt but also believe that if such content is allowed to continue to
be on these platforms in this form, then incalculable and irreparable damage
will be caused to the secular fabric of India. All those who are responsible for
allowing this content to be hosted on the websites conspired with those who
are the source of such content, and those who are promoting such material to
malice and defame the country with intention to spread the communal
violence to destabilise the country with undisclosed persons are liable to be
prosecuted and punished under these Sections 153 (A), 153(B), 292, 293,
295(A), 298,109, 500 and 120B of the INDIAN PENAL CODE.
16. That the contents which are shown on the social networking websites are
clearly showing and instigating enmity between different groups on the
grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language etc. and doing
acts prejudicial to maintenance of harmony. It is clearly visible on the material
available on these social networking websites.
17. That the content which has been clearly shown on these websites are
clearly imputations, assertions, prejudicial to national integration. The material
is clearly visible in the Annexure .
18. That the contents which are available on these social networking websites
is obscene, that will create obscene books, pamphlets, paper, which can
easily be downloaded from these social networking websites. It will affect the
minds of the children. It is also harmful in the development of the nation.
19. That the contents which are clearly mentioned and annexed in Annexure,
shows the contents and malafide intention of these social networking
websites to create deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage, religious
feelings of any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs.
20. That the cause of action for filing the present complaint has arisen on
8.12.2011 when the complainant downloaded these pictures and photos and
these facts came to know in the knowledge of the complainant while sitting at
his above stated residence The cause of action is continuing and arising day
by day.
21. That the cause of action has arisen within the jurisdiction of the Hon'ble
Court which may take cognizance of the offence as committed by the
accused persons.
22. That the present complaint has been filed within the period of limitation
and this Hon'ble Court is competent to entertain & try the present complaint
and grant relief to the complainant.
23. That the complainant seeks the permission of this Hon'ble Court to urge
any additional ground or to examine any other witness or to submit any other
documents which would be made available to him at the time of hearing of
this complaint.
PRAYER
In view of the aforesaid submission made here in and in the interest of the
justice, it is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may
graciously be pleased to:
1. Register the present complaint.
2. Take cognizance of the offence, as the contents per-se amount to
commission of offences, as indicated above, without anything more.
3. Summon try and punish the accused persons for committing the offences
under section 153(A), 153(B), 292, 293, 295(A), 298, 109, 500 and 120B of
the IPC.
4. Take appropriate steps for prosecution and punishment of the above
website owners, concerned officials and their representatives and
undisclosed accused persons.
Pass such other or further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and
proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
COMPLAINANT
Through Counsel
Dated: 15.12.2011
Place: New Delhi
raft/Specimen/Format:
Private Complaint under section 200 CrPC before Magistrate
***************************************
IN THE COURT OF CONCERNED LEARNED AREA MAGISTRATE, LAHORE
PRIVATE COMPLAINT NO:____________/2018
___, RESIDENT OF ____, LAHORE.
….…Complainant
VERSUS
i. ____, SON OF UNKNOWN
ii. ____, DUGHTER OF UNKNOWN
BOTH RESIDENTS OF ____, LAHORE.
……Respondents
COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 200 CRPC
RESPECTFULLY SHEWETH,
1. That the addresses of the parties of the purpose of issuance of summons/warrants issued
by this Honorable court have correctly been given above.
2. That through the instant complaint, the complainant humbly seeks indulgence of this
learned court for summoning and conviction of the respondents/ accused persons for
committing heinous crimes and taking law in their hands
3. That succinctly stated facts giving rise to the filing of complaint in hand are that the
complainant is in peaceful possession of upper portion of the property situated at ______,
Lahore. The complainant is a retired banker and he has been delivering lectures at various
universities and private colleges since his retirement. The complainant obtained above
mentioned property at rent and he has been enjoying the possession of the same as a
peaceful tenant.
4. That respondent/ accused no. 2 dwells at the lower portion/ ground floor of aforesaid
property as tenant. The respondent no. 2 is running an unknown and suspicious business at
the place of her residence and her customers often visit the portion occupied by her even at
odd hours. The complainant and his family members had requested the respondent no. 2 to
mend her ways of business because the complainant and his family members were facing
severe problems due to frequent visits of her customers. However, she never paid any heed
to the requests of the complainant. On the contrary, she carried on her suspicious business
and activities.
5. That the married daughter of the complainant, namely _____ resides at ____(out of
Pakistan) with her husband but for the purpose of her education she is living with the
complainant at his residence these days. The daughter of the complainant is doing her MBA
Marketing from Punjab University. On 26th of January 2018 at about 1:00pm when the
daughter of the complainant tried to park her car in the porch she was forbidden by the
respondent no. 2 to do the same because respondent no. 2 wanted one of her customers to
park the car in the porch but the daughter of the complainant refused to let any outsider park
his car inside the house. The complainant also reached the spot and he once again
requested the respondent no. 2 to leave her mysterious activities. The respondent no. 2
threatened the complainant and his daughter that she would teach both of them a lesson but
the complainant and his daughter left the spot and went to their residence that is upper
portion of the house.
6. That after half an hour someone knocked at the door of the upper portion of the property,
wherein, the complainant resides; the daughter of the complainant went to open the door.
When the daughter of the complainant opened the door she found respondent no. 1 along
with three unknown persons standing at the door. The moment she opened the door
respondent/accused no. 1 grabbed the daughter of the complainant from her hair, when the
complainant tried to release her from her clutches, Respondent No. 1 kicked the
complainant, snatched his phone and locked the door from outside and took away the
daughter of the complainant to the lower portion of the house. The respondents along with
two unknown persons beat the daughter of the complainant. While respondent no.1 had
grabbed the daughter of the complainant through her hair, respondent no. 2 snatched heavy
gold chain with diamonds from her neck and then after beating her they locked her in a room
and kept her in illegal detention, moreover, they opened the motor vehicle of the daughter of
the complainant Toyota Corolla and took away registration book of the vehicle along with the
Laptop of Apple company of latest model owned by the daughter of the complainant which
was placed at the rear seat of aforesaid vehicle.
7. That the complainant was detained in the upper portion along with his wife, he made much
noise but of no use, therefore, he couldn’t resist while his daughter was being detained and
beaten up. After a while, other daughter of the complainant, namely _______ reached the
premises unlocked the complainant and thereafter the complainant along with other daughter
went to the lower portion and rescued the daughter of the complainant. The respondent no. 1
flew away with diamond and gold chain, laptop and original documents of aforesaid vehicle.
The police also reached the spot and the complainant also submitted an application for
registration of FIR against the culprits i.e. respondents but due to some unknown reasons
they failed to take any action against the respondents. Copy of application submitted to
police is appended herewith.
8. The illegal and unlawful acts of the respondent amount to heinous offences and crimes
and they also took away valuable items of value more than one million, therefore, they are
liable to be prosecuted inter-alia under following sections:
i. 149, PPC-1860: Unlawful assembly
ii. 347, PPC-1860: Wrongful confinement to extort property, or constraint to illegal act
iii. 354, PPC-1860: Assault and criminal force to women with intent to outrage her modesty
iv. 386, PPC-1860: Extortion by putting a person in fear of death or grievous hurt
v. 356, PPC,1860: Assault and Criminal force in attempt to commit theft of property carried
by person
PRAYER
In aforementioned circumstance, it is humbly prayed the respondents may be summoned
and punished in accordance with the law.
COMPLAINANT
Through
ZEESHAN AHMAD MALIK
Advocate High Court
C___ COMPLAINANT
ADDRESS _________________
VS
A___ ACCUSED
ADDRESS _________________
PRAYER
COMPLAINANT
THROUGH
______ADVOCATE
Place :
Date :
STATE COMPLAINANT
VS
A__ ACCUSED
5. That the Police told the Applicant that his car is no longer
required for further investigation. The Applicant is in need of his
car. In case it is allowed to remain at the Police station, it may
get damaged being out of use.
6. The Applicant humbly pray that his car No____ may please be
released to him on Superdari. The Applicant Assure its production
before the court as and when required by the Police or the Court.
PRAYER
a) that the court may pass order to release his Car No_____ on
Superdari to the Applicant.
APPLICANT
THROUGH
Place :
Date :
VS
A__ ACCUSED
AFFIDAVIT
3. That my above car has been covered by Police from the thief
and presently is under custody of Police.
4. That the Police told the Applicant that his car is no longer
required for further investigation.
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION
DEPONENT
IN THE COURT OF THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE AT
_________
A___ COMPLAINANT
VS
B___ ACCUSED
3. That the above vehicle has been covered by the Police and
presently is under custody of the Police , Police Station. An F.I.R.
No._____ , under Section 279, 337 of the Indian Penal Code has
also been lodged by the Police Station. Necessary investigations
have been completed by the police.
4. That the Police told the Applicant that his car is no longer
required for further investigation.
5. That the Applicant need the above vehicle to carry out its
repairs.
PRAYER
a) that the court may pass order to release his Car No_____
along with Driving License and documents to the Applicant.
APPLICANT
THROUGH
______ADVOCATE
Place :
Date :
A___ COMPLAINANT
VS
B___ ACCUSED
AFFIDAVIT
3. That the above vehicle has been covered by the Police and
presently is under custody of the Police , Police Station. An F.I.R.
No._____ , under Section 279, 337 of the Indian Penal Code has
also been lodged by the Police Station. Necessary investigations
have been completed by the police.
4. That the Police told the Applicant that his car is no longer
required for further investigation.
5. That the Applicant need the above vehicle to carry out its
repairs.
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION
DEPONENT
IN THE MATTER OF
STATE
VS
(Mention the name of the applicant)
Under Section: (Mention the sections under which the FIR has
been filed)
10. That the applicant shall not leave India without the previous
permission of the Court.
11. That the applicant is ready and willing to accept any other
conditions as may be imposed by the Court or the police in
connection with the case.
PRAYER
It is therefore prayed that the court may order for the release of
the applicant on bail in the interest of justice.
Any other order which the court may deem fit and proper in the
facts and circumstances of the case may be also passed in favor
of the applicant.
APPLICANT
THROUGH
COUNSEL
N THE MATTER OF
STATE
VS
(Mention the name of the accused)
Under Section: (Mention the sections under which the FIR has
been filed)
Accused under custody since (Give the date from when the
accused is in custody)
1. That the present FIR has been registered on false and bogus
facts. The facts stated in the FIR are fabricated, concocted and
without any basis.
10. That the applicant shall not leave India without the previous
permission of the Court.
11. That the applicant is ready and willing to accept any other
conditions as may be imposed by the Court or the police in
connection with the case.
12. That the Court below has failed to consider all the facts and
circumstances of the case and has wrongly dismissed the bail
application.
It is therefore prayed that the court may direct the release the
applicant on bail in the interest of justice.
Any other order which the court may deem fit and proper in the
facts and circumstances of the case may be also passed in favor
of the applicant.
APPLICANT
THROUGH
COUNSEL
N THE COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, RAWALPINDI.
ASR son of AGR resident of H. No. _, Block No. _,___Road near __ Bridge,
Tehsil and District Rawalpindi.
…Plaintiff
Versus
Respectfully Sheweth,
Any other relief, which this Honorable court deems fit may also be
granted.
Plaintif
Through
Counsel
Verification:
Verified on Oath on this day of Apr 2009, that the contents of the para
No. 1 to 10 are true and correct to the best of our knowledge and belief
and rest of the paras are believed to be true and correct.
Plaintiff
ASR …Plaintiff
Versus
Respectfully Sheweth:
1. That the applicant / plaintiff has filed the above captioned suit
before this Honourable Court, the grounds taken in the main suit may
kindly be read as integral part of this application.
2. That the applicant/ plaintiff has good prima facie case and likely
to succeed in it.
3. That the balance of convenience also lies in favour of the
applicant/plaintiff.
4. That the applicant / plaintiff shall suffer irreparable loss, if the stay
order has not been granted.
PRAYER
Petitioner
Through
Counsel
ASR …Plaintiff
Versus
Affidavit
That I, ASR son of AGR resident of H. No.__, Block No.__, __Road near
__Bridge, Tehsil and District Rawalpindi do solemnly affirm and declare
that the contents of above application are true and correct to the best
of my knowledge and belief and nothing material has been concealed
therefrom.
Deponent
Verified on oath that the deposition is true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and belief and nothing material has been concealed
therefrom.
Deponent
Limitation Act, 1963