You are on page 1of 3

In the Court of _______________________at Patna

Suit No. ………… / 20…….

Parijat d/o Dr. Vijay Kumar
122, Ashiana Nagar, Patna, Bihar

......................................... Plaintiff

Vs.

Sachin Prasad s/o O. P. Prasad
124, Ashiana Nagar, Patna, Bihar ......................................... Respondent

SUIT FOR DECLERATION OF TITLE BY ADVERSE POSSESSION

The plaintiff respectfully states as follows: 1. That Plaintiff, a Govt. Servant working in Patna, has acquired the possession of Plot
No. 123 at Ashiana Nagar, Patna,(hereinafter the property) since Twelfth Day of
September, Two Thousand (12.09.2000).
2. That the respondent, the title holder of the said property, resides in Plot No. 124 at
Ashiana Nagar, Patna, adjacent to above mentioned property, since January, 1993
and had the knowledge of possession of above mentioned property by the plaintiff.
3. The boundaries of the said propertyis as under:
East: Road
West: Plot number 124
North: Road
South: Colony wall

which is within this court's pecuniary jurisdiction. YYY . 6..00. 300000/-. That the respondent on Fourteenth Day of Feburary. The plaintiff. (Signature of the plaintiff) Date: …………………. Two Thousand Fifeteen filed a suit praying permannent injuction against the plaintiff and before the said date no suit was filed by the respondent against the adverse possesion of the plaintiff 7. Cause of Action and Limitation 8. That the plaintiff acquired possession of the property by installing fence on the above mentioned property with the intention of acquiring the property. 10. which is within this Court's territorial jurisdiction. That the plaintiff had the continuous and uninterrupted and exclusive possession of the property.000/. therefore prays that Title be declared in favour of the plaintiff on the basis of adverse possesion Continuation of possesion to the property may be granted. The value of the plot is Rs.4. The plot is located in Patna. and has paid all the property taxes of the property from the date of possession. 9. The suit is valued for the purpose of jurisdiction and court-fee at Rs. Place: …………………. 5.4. and the property has been continuously used by the plaintiff for personal farming without any objection from the respondent.

do hereby solemnly verify that the contents from paras 1 to 5 are correct and true to the best of my knowledge and contents from para 6 to 11 are based on legal advice. Affirmed at Patna this Twenty-Eighth Day of April 2016. (Signature) Plaintiff .Advocate Verification I. which I believe to be correct. Parijat Singh.