Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Versus
1. That the Petitioners have filed the above said petition for eviction of tenant
against the respondent under section 14 (1) (a) and (b) of Delhi Rent Control Act,
1958.
2. That it is respectfully submitted that accordingly notice was issued and the
respondents have filed written statement on 13/10/2014.
4. That it is further submitted that in reply to para 18 (a) 2 of the written statement
that he had entered into partnership business and parted with the possession of
rented premises completely without obtaining the permission of the petitioners in
writing as required under the law as the respondent has not filed any document
with regard to approval/ consent obtained by the respondent from the petitioner,
which is an offence under section 14 (4) of DRC Act. Even though the
Respondent alleges to have received the Approval in his Reply dated 17-5-2012
and in reply to para 18 (a) (2) of the petition, but no such consent has been filed
by the Respondent, since none was ever given. Quite surprisingly, the
Respondent has not furnished any details of the alleged approval / consent, like
date, time and mode as well as the name of the person granting the same.
Filed by
Applicant/Respondent
Through
Counsel
IN THE COURT OF THE RENT CONTROLLER,
(CENTRAL), TIS HAZARI COURTS, DELHI
In the matter of :
Versus
2. That the accompanying Application has been drafted by my counsel under my in-
structions and the contents thereof are true to my knowledge.
Deponent
VERIFICATION:
Verified at New Delhi on this ___ day of December, 2014 that the contents of above
affidavit are true and correct to best of my knowledge and nothing material are concealed there
from.
DEPONENT