Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Scope
1.4 References
Penetrant examination
Symbol Description
AC Alternating current
DC Direct current
Crack depth
Cross-section area
Frequency
I Applied current
R Electrical resistance
- 3 -
Symbol Description
Permeability
Relative permeability
Vacuum permeability
σ Conductivity
Definitions
(ii) Permeability
(iii) Conductivity
2. APPLICATION
2.1 General
The operator may ask for additional information which can be helpful
in the evaluation of measurements.
3. PERSONNEL
(vi) be familiar with the importance of crack type and crack con-
figuration on the reliability of measured depth.
4. SURFACE PREPATION
The surface roughness will also affect the reliability and accuracy
of the measured crack values, and this influence will depend on the
frequency used. Sizing of shallow cracks require high frequency cur-
rent which in turn require smooth surface due to the very small skin
depth (see also Section 6.2).
(ii) the current electrodes and their cabling to the power supply
(iv) the measuring probe with all its potential electrodes and
the cabling to the control panel.
6.1 General
The described crack depth measuring methods do not replace the usual
methods for crack detection, but supplement them in the assessment
of size, which is one of the most important parameters in any fitness
for purpose evaluation.
- the direct current techniques (DCPD), where a crack will give rise
to an increase in the resistance because of the reduction in the
cross sectional area.
(1)
δ = (l/µrµ0σπf)1/2
where
µr = relative permability
µ0 = vacuum permability
= 4π x 10-7 H/m
σ = conductivity
f = frequency
As seen from Eq (1), the skin depth can be altered by varying the
frequency of the applied current. The choice of frequency will there-
fore influence the applications and limitations of the method.
where
current lines
lines
current lines
V0 = RI
= ρs I/F (4)
where
R = electrical resistance
I = applied current
If the current electrodes are placed near the crack, the potential
increase will be significantly more influenced by the distance around
the crack than the reduced cross section area.
7. INSTRUMENTATION
1) A current supply.
ACPD
DCPD
The measuring device shall contain a touch probe with two poten-
tial electrodes for voltage measurements, signal treatment elec-
tronics and a crack depth readout. The touch probe can preferably
be equipped with more than the two absolute necessary electrodes
in order to perform differential measurements. This type of mea-
surement is done to compensate for differences in material quali-
ties on each side of the crack, and/or to do reference and crack
measurements in one operation.
3) A calibration block.
8. EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION
8.1 General
8.2.1 ACPD
8.2.2 DCPD
The NORDTEST Calibration Blocks for ACPD satisfy the stated require-
ments in Sections 8.2.1, and the range of blocks has the following
identification:
The NORDTEST calibration blocks for DCPD satisfy the stated require-
ments in Section 8.2.2 and is schematically shown in Fig. 8.2. The
width should be 100 mm or, if applicable, as required to achieve a
current density comparable to that expected in the test object. The
block identification DCPD No. 1 means 1 mm slit, DCPD No. 2 a 2 mm
slit and so on.
If, however, the test object represents any limiting factor, as lis-
ted below and also described in Chapter 9, it is strongly recommended
to manufacture a reference block which contains actual limiting
factors. Such reference blocks will help to establish correction cur-
ves and to compensate for effects not included in the standard cali-
bration. Many of the limiting factors can be compensated for by in-
strument adjustments. Even so, it is recommended to use a reference
block to increase the measurement reliability. The reference block
should reflect the object to be examined, with respect to:
* crack depths
9.1 General
9.2.1 ACPD
The potential drop techniques are all intended for depth measurement
of surface breaking cracks. The crack to be sized must be open, which
means without metallic contact between the two crack faces. Fatique
cracks usually fall into this category.
9.2.2 DCPD
The potential drop techniques are all intended for depth sizing of
surface breaking cracks. The DCPD method is not as sensitive as the
- 17 -
ACPD to metallic contact between the two crack faces, if the contact
areas only will be a small fraction of the total crack area. Anyway,
sizing of cracks without metallic bridging, like most fatique cracks,
will be among the most favourable.
9.3.1 ACPD
9.3.2 DCPD
9.4.1 ACPD
9.4.2 DCPD
One important difference is that the surface geometry much more signi-
ficantly will affect the DCPD measured results than results obtained
with ACPD.
9.6.1 General
D I S T A N C E F R O M EDGE (MM)
9.6.2 ACPD
9.6.3 DCPD
9.7.1 ACPD
Basically, the extension along the crack is measured, and not the
actual projected depth to which it penetrates from the surface, un-
less the crack is penetrating normally. Hence, if the depth of an
oblique crack is the vital parameter, the oblique angle must be found
by some other gauging procedure, and then the depth can be calculated.
9.7.2 DCPD
Fig. 9.2. Illustration of correction curves for short and deep cracks
(small length-to-depth ratios).
If a crack penetrates nearly the whole test piece, the current flow
will be hampered, resulting in a too high measured depth value. The
influence will become significant when the crack penetrates more
- 21 -
than approximately:
Crack tip stresses can cause a crack closure, and hence, an unde-
restimation of the crack depth, normally up to approximately 1 mm.
Crack tip stresses will also cause changes in material quality and
therefore also in the skin depth, which accordingly will produce
an error in the depth reading. An applied strain to the test speci-
men causing the crack to be open is recommended.
9.13 Bridging
A firm metallic contact between areas of the two crack faces will
cause electrical bridging as the current takes the path of least
resistance. The result is often a considerable depth underestimation.
The ACPD techniques are more sensitive to bridging than the DCPD
techniques.
- 22 -
10.1 General
Typical achievements for crack depth meters are listed in the two
following sections.
10.2 ACPD
10.3 DCPD
11.2 Preparation
(i) The surface of the test piece, where the measuring probe
and the current electrodes will make contact, must be pro-
perly cleaned to allow for good electric contact (Chapter
4).
11.3 Calibration
When the required calibration has been carried out, the examination
procedure will be as follows:
(i) The current amplitude and frequency shall not be altered dur-
ing calibration.
(iii) The sizing of crack depths in the test object can then be
carried out. The placement of current electrodes should be
as for the reference block measurements, if applicable, and
in accordance with the operating instructions of the equip-
ment.
13. REPORTING
a) Job identification
b) Test object identification, drawings and dimensions
c) Time and place of the examination
d) Ambient conditions of the examination
e) Name and signature of the operator
f) Relevant material characteristics
g) Surface condition and geometry
h) Data related to equipment, e g, manufacturer, serial no, type
(including ACPD or DCPD), current amplitude, frequency, probe
description
i) Description of calibration block and report on calibration data
j) Description of reference blocks, if used, and report on reference
data
k) Data concerning the results from the examination
l) Additional data which may concern limitations of the examina-
tion because of surface geometry, crack geometry or others
m) Specific requirements agreed upon by the parties involved
n) Crack profile description, if required.
- 29 -
Annex A
REFERENCES
14. Haugen, R. and Rangnes, E.: "A new instrumentation for fatigue
crack depth measurement with AC potential drop technique.
Proc. Europ. Conf. on NDT, Vienna, 1982.
15. Dalberg, P., Haugen, R. and Myrhaug, 0.: "Crack depth determi-
nation. The AC potential drop technique". VERITAS report No 81-
1079, 1981.
16. Hicks, M.A. and Pickard, A.C.: "A comparison of theoretical and
experimental methods of calibrating the electrical potential
drop technique for crack length determination". Int. Journ. of
Fracture, 20 (1982), 91-101.