Professional Documents
Culture Documents
85 Intraosseous Devices
Michael W. Day
PURPO SE: Intraosseous access is indicated when intravenous (IV) access cannot
be obtained or cannot be obtained in a timely manner and access to venous
circulation is needed for the administration of medications or fluids.
PREREQUISITE NURSING • IO blood can be used for many laboratory tests, including
KNOWLEDGE typing and screening, electrolyte values, chemistries,
blood gas values, drug levels, and hemoglobin levels.7,20
• Intraosseous (IO) access is a safe and reliable access point ❖ However, specimen samples from the marrow have a
into the noncollapsible marrow cavity that allows direct lower correlation to serum levels after 30 minutes of
access to the venous circulation.6–8 Indications for IO resuscitation.4
20
access include status epilepticus, extensive burns, morbid ❖ IO samples may be used for point-of-care testing.
obesity (which may prevent peripheral or central line ❖ In addition, drawing of blood from an IO device may
placement),6 sepsis, and multiple traumatic injuries.8 not be recommended by specific manufacturers and has
• IO is significantly faster than central venous placement the potential of occluding the device.11
during actual resuscitation15 and in simulation.19 • The onset of action for medications is similar to that of
• Use of IO devices may decrease the use of emergency IV medications.7,8 However, administration via the IO
femoral access, with its attendant complications.8 “Despite route may result in lower serum concentrations versus the
recommendations from a number of specialty societies on IV route for the following medications: ceftriaxone, chlor-
the use of IO access when IV access has failed in emergent amphenicol, phenytoin, tobramycin, and vancomycin.4
patients, IO access appears to be an underutilized access • Marrow-toxic medications should not be infused via the
tool in the hospital ED (emergency departments).”21 IO route.13
• The Volkmann’s canals that are located throughout the • There is some research to support the use of IO devices
bone connect with the medullary canal and the blood for IV contrast.1,12
vessels of the periosteum (Fig. 85-1). When medications • All resuscitation medications, isotonic fluids, and blood
and fluids are introduced into the medullary canal, they products may be given via the IO route5; however, myo-
flow through the vascular plexi directly into the vascular necrosis has been reported with the infusion of hypertonic
system.6,7 saline solution via the IO route.17
• Mechanical insertion devices are available for insertion of • Medications administered via the IO route should be fol-
IO needles.6 These devices include the bone injection gun lowed by a 5- to 10-mL flush of normal saline solution.
(BIG; Waismed, a Persys Medical Co, Houston, TX; Fig. Resistance to the manual flush will be felt but does NOT
85-2), the FASTResponder adult IO infusion system indicate incorrect placement. If swelling or infiltration is
(Pyng Medical Corp, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Fig. 85-3), observed, remove the device and attempt IO access in
and the EZ-IO (Teleflex, Shavano Park, TX; Fig. 85-4). another bone.6,7
These three devices are approved by the US Food and • Fluids running into an IO line should be administered with
Drug Administration (FDA) for IO access in adult patients. a pressure bag inflated to 300 mm Hg because the pressure
Two of the devices (BIG, Arrow EZ-IO) use a specially needed to push the fluid into the bone marrow may exceed
designed needle with a stylet or trocar. The third device that of volumetric IV pumps. Flow rates can be managed
(FASTResponder) uses a metal-tipped plastic catheter. with the IV tubing roller clamp.6
The attributes of the three devices of this procedure are • Complications of IO access include compartment syn-
summarized in Table 85-1. drome, osteomyelitis, fracture, extravasation,5 necrosis,5,10
• In adults, the available IO access sites, depending on the and infection.8
specific device and following each manufacturer ’s guide- • A syringe should not be attached directly to the hub of the
lines,3 include the following: IO needle because it could cause dislodgment, increase
❖ Tibial plateau: 1 to 2 cm distal to the tibial tuberosity the size of the hole, and cause extravasation or loss of the
❖ Distal tibia: 1 to 2 cm above the medial malleolus IO site. To extend access to the IO needle, attach extension
❖ Manubrium: 1.5 cm below the sternal notch tubing to the hub of the IO needle and secure it to the skin.
❖ Greater tubercle of the proximal humerus Some device insertion kits come with extension tubing.
• A recent study using the EZ-IO device found that there • Absolute contraindications to attempting an IO access
was a significantly higher success rate with proximal tibial include previous attempts or fractures of the targeted
compared with humeral placement.18 bone.
748
85 Intraosseous Devices 749
Figure 85-1 Intraosseous circulation. (From Day MW: Intraosseous devices for intravenous
access in adult trauma patients, Crit Care Nurs 31[2]:76–90.)
Figure 85-2 Bone injection gun (BIG; adult). (From Day MW:
Intraosseous devices for intravenous access in adult trauma
patients, Crit Care Nurs 31[2]:76–90.)
Adapted from Day MW: Intraosseous devices for intravenous access in adult trauma patients, Crit Care Nurs 31(2):76–90, 2011.
• Describe the major steps of the procedure, including the • Obtain the patient’s baseline vital signs and cardiac
patient’s role in the procedure. Rationale: Explanation rhythm. Rationale: Baseline data facilitate the identifica-
decreases patient anxiety, enhances cooperation, provides tion of clinical problems and identify the urgency of
an opportunity for the patient to voice concerns, and pre- obtaining IO access.
vents accidental contamination of the sterile field and • If possible, determine the patient’s allergy history (e.g.,
equipment. lidocaine, antiseptic solutions). Rationale: This assess-
• Explain the expected outcomes of the procedure. Ratio- ment decreases the risk for allergic reactions by avoiding
nale: Explanation reduces anxiety and clarifies the dura- known allergenic products.
tion and goals of IO access.
Patient Preparation
PATIENT ASSESSMENT AND • Verify that the patient is the correct patient using two
PREPARATION identifiers. Rationale: Before performing a procedure, the
nurse should ensure the correct identification of the patient
Patient Assessment for the intended intervention.
• Assess the patient for fractures or infections at the inser- • Ensure that the patient and family understand preprocedural
tion site, for previous bone surgeries at the site, and for a teaching. Answer questions as they arise, and reinforce
history of osteoporosis or fractures of the target bone. information as needed. Rationale: Understanding of previ-
Rationale: An alternate site should be accessed to avoid ously taught information is evaluated and reinforced.
possible complications associated with the previous • Perform a preprocedure verification and time out, if non-
conditions. emergent. Rationale: Ensures patient safety.
PD
AD
LD
Figure 85-5 EZ-IO needle sets. (From Day MW: Intraosseous devices for intravenous access in
adult trauma patients, Crit Care Nurs 31[2]:76–90.)
*Level E: Multiple case reports, theory-based evidence from expert opinions, or peer-reviewed professional organizational standards without clinical studies to
support recommendations.
*Level M: Manufacturer’s recommendations only.
Documentation
Documentation should include the following:
• Patient and family education • Type and amount of anesthetic used
• Preprocedure verification and timeout • Assessment of insertion site
• Site of insertion • Method of securing the IO needle in place
• Number of IO insertion attempts • Problems encountered during or after the procedure
• Sites of previous IO insertion attempts • Pain assessment, interventions, and effectiveness
• Brand of the IO device inserted and, if appropriate, • Vital signs and cardiac rhythm
manufacturer ’s needle description • Date and time the IO device is removed
• Confirmation of IO needle placement • Assessment of site after the IO device is removed
• Date and time of insertion
85 Intraosseous Devices 757