Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. The felony is said to be when the law attaches capital punishment of afflictive penalties.
A. Grave C. Serious
2. Which of the following must be considered in determining whether the crime committed is only attempted, consummated or
frustrated?
3. If an offense was committed by a Singaporean national on board a Singapore airlines plane about to land at the Davao
International Airport, what penal law will apply?
4. Ambassadors or heads of states can NOT be held criminally liable in another state or place of assignment under the principles
of international law . This is an exception to the characteristics of Criminal Law which is:
A. Immunity C. Generality
B. Territorial D. Prospectivity
6. This theory advocates that the purpose of punishment under criminal law is the protection of the society from the actual and
potential wrong doer.
7. What are the infraction of mere rules of convenience designed to secure a more orderly regulation of the affairs of society.
8. What circumstances can be considered aggravating with the slaying of an 85 years old man?
9. Who are criminally liable , when having knowledge of the commission of the crime, without having principally participated
therein, takes part subsequently to the commission, either in profiting, by the effects of crime, or by concealing or destroying the
body of the crime?
A. Witnesses C. Accomplice
B. Principals D. Accessories
11. The legal term "DELICTO COMPUESTO" (compound crime) is best described as
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part Two Page 1
A. two acts producing two or more grave or less felony
12. Which of the following is not the requisite for self - defense
A. Unlawful aggression
13. Refers to quality wherein an act may be attributed to a person as the holder or author.
A. Culpability C. Responsibility
B. Imputability D. Liability
14. What rule provides that when a crime is committed on board a foreign vessel while that vessel is in the territory of another
country, the crime shall be tried under the law of the territory where it is committed?
16. Allen and Ben are both Filipino citizen, they took tour in Singapore and while in Singapore Allen attacked Ben for no valid
reason. Can Ben file a case against Allen in the Philippines for physical injuries?
18. Refers to the forfeiture of the right of the state to execute the final sentence after a certain lapse of time.
19. Congressman Mikey while on the way to attend a senate session was arrested by SPO4 Dela Pena of the HPG for a traffic
violation. What is the liability of the police officer?
20. Within how many hours a person arrested for the commission of an offense punishable by afflictive penalties must be
delivered to the proper judicial authority?
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part Two Page 2
A. 12 hrs C. 36 hrs
B. 18 hrs. D. 18 hrs.
21. PO2 Nilo Santos was stabbed while patrolling along a dark alley of his beat, he died on the spot due to three stab wounds on
his back and the perpetrator took his wallet and service firearms. What crime was committed?
22. PO3 Castro without any search warrant went inside the house of Alberto, who was charged with robbery. Alberto did not stop
him or say anything while his house was being searched. What crime was committed by PO3?
23. Under Republic Act No. 9262 Order may be issued for the purpose of preventing further acts of violence against a woman or
her child. this may be filed by any of the following, except.
24. What crime exist when a single act constitutes two or more grave or less grave felonies or when an offense is necessary means
for committing the other?
A. complex C. continuing
B. composite D. compound
25. Johnny was able to have sex with his girlfriend by promising her with marriage and a car. What crime was committed?
A. Rape C. Seduction
26. In what instances can alibi (the weakest defense ) acquire commensurate strength in evidential value?
D. When questions on whether or not accused committed the offense are clear
27. A male student ripped the dress of a teachers are rubbed his penis over the woman's genital without taking off her
underwear is liable for What crime?
28. An act which would be an offense against persons or property was if not the inherent impossibility of its accomplishment.
29. Under R.A 9262, this order may be issued for the purpose of preventing further acts of violence against a woman or her child?
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part Two Page 3
30. Under R.A 9344, a child who vulnerable to and at the risk of committing criminal offenses because of personal, family and
social circumstances is referred to as:
31. Pedro Recruited several women in their barangay to engage in the sex trade, what crime was committed?
a. Slavery c. Prostitution
32. Police operatives in order to ensure conviction of the suspect, were caught in the CCTV camera planting evidence. they may be
held liable for what offense?
33.Mary Jane a University Professor having carnal knowledge with her student is guilty of what crime?
34. PO1 Jose stole a pistol of his COP from the locker using the owners key, what crime was committed?
a. Robbery c. Theft
35. What crime would be charged against a domestic helper who was caught in the act of carting away appliances and jewelries of
her employer?
b. Robbery d. Estafa
36. Alex and Brian are board mates. Brian went out from their boarding house. Alex put a chair to block the door. Suddenly, a
person is forcing to open the door blocked with chair. Ask the person forcing to open the door, the person is not responding. Alex
went to kitchen to get a knife, Brian forced to open the door. Then Alex struck Brain with the knife. Brian died. What crime was
committed by Alex?
37. There is a Married woman having sexual intercourse with her driver Joey not her husband. What crime is committed?
a. adultery c. seduction
38.. Mr. Burned the car of his dead victim Miss C to hide the body of the crime? What crime was committed?
39. What a crime is committed by a police officer who refrains from arresting a person who has committed a crime punishable by
reclusion perpetua in exchange for money?
40. Alma, a receiving teller of the Cooperative Saving Bank, Taking advantage of her position, appropriated the amount of P100,
000.00 that she had in her possession. What crime did Alma commit?
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part Two Page 4
a. Theft c. estafa
41. Under Republic Act No. 9165, What is the penalty for a PDEA agent found guilty of planting any dangerous drugs and /or
controlled precursor and essential chemical, regardless of quality and purity?
a. 12 years and 1 day to 20 years imprisonment and a fire ranging from 100, 000.00 to 500,000.00
c. Imprisonment of 20 years and 1day to life and a fine ranging from 400,000.00 to 500,000.00
d. Death Penalty
42. Joey Impregnated his girlfriend Chona. Luis, Chonas father, got mad and threatened Joey of bodily harm if he will not marry if
he will not marry his daughter. What Crime Luis has committed?
b. Seduction d. Bigamy
a. Unlawful aggression
46. Felony committed by any person who shall deprive another either totally or partially of organs of reproduction.
a. 48 hrs. c. 10 days
b 72 hrs. d. 15 days
48. Where shall the arresting officer immediately bring an arrested wanted person?
49. How Many day does a child that was born before the marriage can be presumed as legitimate?
b. 191days e. 190days
c. none of these
50. Which of the following is authorized to search for any evidence in the computer hardware?
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part Two Page 5
a. Logistic Officer c. Computer Supplier
51. Under R.A 9262, which of the following orders may be issued for the purpose of preventing further acts of violence against a
woman or her child?
52. What is the period of prescription of crimes punishable by reclusion perpetua, reclusion temporal, and or death?
56. Which of the following must be established as evidence in addiction to sexual intercourse in cases of rape?
57. Which of the following evidence of the same kind to that is already given?
58.The following are instances where the court may refuse the introduction of objector or real evidence and rely on the evidence
alone. expect:
d. The exhibition of the object would only result delay and unnecessary expenses out of proportion to the evidentiary value of
such object.
59. Which of the following types of evidence properly described as "illustrative evidence"? The purpose of which is hold the judge
to visualize object and scenes pertinent to the case. It is also useful to police officer and other witness in describing the scenes of
the crime.
60. These are evidence which results in the greatest certainty of the question.
61. When is the evidence presented in court for admissibility considered relevant to the issue?
d. when it has a direct bearing and actual connection to the facts and issues
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part Two Page 6
62. It refers to proof of fact or series of fact which taken singly or collectively gives rise to an inferences that a particular fact
indeed exist.
63. Which of the following are the three categories of evidence as classified by the Rules Court?
64. This class of evidence is also referred to as Autoptic Preference since they are exhibited or presented in open court in
order for the judge to arrive at a proper conclusion.
67. A declaration of dying person and without any hope of recovery concerning the facts and circumstances under which the fatal
injury was inflicted may be offered as evidence at the trial of the person charged having caused the death of the declarant. this
declaration is also known as:
69. it is a bar which precludes a person from denying or asserting anything to the contrary of established truth.
70. When can the adverse party object to any testimonial evidence presented?
d. At any time and as soon as the grounds the therefore become reasonably apparent
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part Two Page 7
71. All except one are valid venues, where may petition for suspension of criminal action by reason of pending prejudicial
question in a civil proceeding.
a. it must be in writing
73. Which of the following is not necessary in fixing the amount of bail?
d. None of these
75. If there was error or irregularity in the course of the trial, which remedy is available to the accused that was found guilty?
76.how many days is allowed by the rules for the accused to request for preliminary investigation after learning that a complaint
or information has been filed without a preliminary investigation?
b. Ten(10)days d. Thirty(30)days
77. The Judgment rendered by the trial court changes the nature of the offense from a non-bailable to bailable. Where can the
bail application be resolved?
78. the jurisdiction of the court over the person of the accused is conferred or acquired either by the following,: except_______.
79. The Philippines Congress enacted RA 7877 on February 14, 1995 primarily to protect women from sexual harassment in
specified places and activities. this law is also known as the:
B. Womens Dignity Act 1995 D. Anti- Violence Against Women and their Children
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part Two Page 8
80.The Jurisdiction of courts in criminal case is determined by the extend of the penalty which the law imposes for the offenses
charged with the offense. the statement is:
81. Which of the following Courts exercises jurisdiction over cases involving R.A 3019?
82. The Following persons are authorized to institute or commerce criminal actions, expect
83. Which of the following special courts are also authorized to try or hear criminal cases?
84. Any violation of the Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002 regardless of the impossible penalty, except when one of
the parties involved is a minor is cognizable by what court?
86. It refers to a territorial unit where the power of the courts to be exercised.
B. Venue D. Territory
87. Under the New Constitutions, who is empowered to order or changed the venue or place of trial in order to avoid
miscarriage of justice?
88. The accused was convicted before the Regional Trial Court. If the issue on appeal is purely legal one, where shall
89. Preliminary Investigation is one of the features of the what system of criminal procedure?
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part Two Page 9
A. Criminal Justice System C. Inquisitorial System
90. When may the accused admitted to bail be allowed to question the legality of his arrest?
91. A warrantless arrest can be made by a peace officer or a private person when, in his presence, the person to be
arrested has committed an offense. the phrase "in his presence" was interpreted to mean that except.:
C. There is disturbance created thereby and the officer or private person proceeds at once to the scene of the crime
D. The officer or private person must be at least the distance of 2-5 meters away from the incident
Problem: (92 to93) Joel was caught in flagrante delicto of killing sonny by SPO1 Reyes. After Joel was booked the San pedro
Police Station, SPO1 Reyes executed an affidavit of arrest, Likewise, the relatives of the victim and witness give their respective
92. Under the rules, the case against Joel should be immediately referred to:
93. In the absence or unavailability of the prosecutor the criminal complaint for homicide against Joel may be filed
94. Which of the following is the role of police officers during judicial proceeding?
95. During the roll call, which of the following statement usually spoken by the prosecutor in a criminal case?
96 What is the next step for the order of trial after the evidence of the is presented?
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part TwoPage 10
A. public prosecutor C. Private Prosecutor
98. When an objection has been made to testimony of the witness and the judge orders that it be sustained, it means
99. This happens when the trial judge enters the courts room and the clerk or bailiff announces his presence.
100. It literally refers to a friend of the court, one with a strong interest in or views on the subject matter
FINAL EXAMINATION
IN CRIMINAL LAW (BK I)
MULTIPLE CHOICE
1. In case of the conviction of the accused, who will pay the cost of the proceedings.
A. Relatives of the accused C. The winning party
B. The accused D. The State
2. If the property of the accused is not sufficient for the payment of all the pecuniary liabilities,
which will be given the
first priority to be paid?
A. The cost of the proceedings C. The indemnification of the
consequential damages
B. the fine D. The reparation of the damaged cause
3. What is the equivalent rate of the subsidiary personal liability if the accused has no property
with which to pay the
fine in the decision of the court.
A. One day of each Ten Pesos C. One day for each Fifteen Pesos
B. One day for each Eight Pesos D. One day for each twenty Pesos
4. If the accused was prosecuted for grave or less grave felony and the principal penalty
imposed is only a fine, how
long shall be the subsidiary imprisonment of the accused.
A. Three (3) months C. Four (4) months
B. Six (6) months D. Five (5) months
5. If the accused was prosecuted for light felonies only, and the principal penalty is only fine, how
long shall be the
subsidiary imprisonment of the accused.
A. Ten (10) days C. Six (6) days
B. Twelve (12) days D. Fifteen (15) days
6. It is a subsidiary personal liability to be suffered by the convict who has no property with which
to meet the fine.
A. Pecuniary penalty C. Subsidiary penalty
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part TwoPage 11
B. Administrative penalty D. Correctional penalty
7. What is the accessory penalty of reclusion perpetua and reclusion temporal.
A. Civil interdiction for life C. Suspension of the right of suffrage
B. Suspension of the right to hold office. D. No accessory penalty
8. What is the accessory penalty of Destierro.
A. Civil interdiction for life
B. Suspension from public office, profession or calling
C. Suspension of the right to suffrage
D. No accessory penalty
9. Every penalty imposed for the commission of a felony shall carry with it the ___________ of
the proceeds of the
crime and the instruments or tools with which it was committed.
A. Destruction C. Auction
B. Forfeiture D. Removal
10. The proceeds and instruments or tools of the crime shall be taken in favor of the
__________.
A. Victim C. Third party
B. Accused D. Government
11. When can confiscation of the proceeds or property or instruments of the crimes be ordered
by the court.
A. When it submitted in evidence
B. When it is not placed at the disposal of the court
C. When it is owned by the victim
D. When it is owned by the accused
12. Articles which are forfeited, when the order of forfeiture is already final cannot be returned
even in case
of an __________
A. Revival of the case C. Appeal
B. Acquittal D. Refilling of the case
13. The penalty prescribed by law for the commission of a felony shall be imposed upon the
_______ in the
commission of the felony.
A. Accessories C. Principals
B. Accomplices D. Co- accused
14. It is the penalty which cannot be imposed when the guilty party is more than seventy years of
age.
A. Reclusion Perpetua C. Death penalty
B. Prison correctional D. Arresto Mayor
15. A single out act constitute two or more grave or less grave felonies is a ____________ crime.
A. Grave offense C. Less grave offense
B. Complex crime D. Continuing crime
16. In defense of relatives, one of the relatives that can be defended are those relatives by
consanguinity within the
fourth civil degree, such as _____________.
A. Brothers and sisters C. First cousin
B. Uncle and niece D. Second cousin
17. When somebody defended a very distant relative, he is committing ________.
A. Self defense C. Defense of stranger
B. Defense of relative D. Fulfillment of duty
18. A person considered as _________ is exempt in all cases from criminal liability.
A. Insane C. Feebleminded
B. Imbecile D. Epileptic
19. During this lucid interval, an insane person acts with _________.
A. Emotions C. Intelligence
B. Anxiety D. Depression
20. It is the __________ who has the burden of proof to show insanity.
A. Prosecution C. Court
B. Defense D. Prosecutor
21. It is a single crime, consisting of a series of acts but all arising from one criminal resolution.
A. Plural crime C. Habitual crime
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part TwoPage 12
B. Continuing crime D. Revolving crime
22. A person shall be deemed to be ________ if within a period of ten years from the date of his
release or last
conviction of the crimes of serious or less serious physical injuries, estafa, or falsification,
he is found guilty of
any of said crimes a third time or oftener.
A. Recidivist C. Ex – convict
B. Habitual delinquent D. Pardonee
23. In imposing fines, the court may fix any amount within the limits established by law; in fixing
the amount in each
case attention shall be given, not only to the mitigating and aggravating circumstances,
but more particularly
to the ________ of the defendant.
A. Education C. Health
B. Wealth and means D. Age
24. Whenever any prisoner shall have served the ________ penalty imposed on him, it shall
appear to the Board
of Indeterminate Sentence that such prisoner is fitted for release, said Board may
authorize the release
of such prisoner on parole, upon such terms and conditions as may be prescribed by the
Board.
A. Medium C. Minimum
B. Maximum D. One half
25. It is the disposition under which a defendant after conviction and sentence is released subject
to
conditions imposed by the court and to the supervision of a probation officer.
A. Parole C. Probation
B. Recognition D. Pardon
26. A person placed on probation.
A. Parolee C. Pardonee
B. Probationer D. Ex- convict
27. One who investigate for the court a referral for probation or supervises a probationer or both
A. Parole officer C. Probation officer
B. Police officer D. Administrative officer
28. No penalty shall be executed except by virtue of a _________ judgment.
A. In terim C. De Jure
B. Final D. Temporary
29. When a convict becomes insane or imbecile after final sentence has been pronounced, the
execution of said
sentence is __________ only as regards the personal penalty.
A. Continued C. Extinct
B. Suspended D. Enforced
30. If the convict becomes insane or imbecile after the final sentence, the payment of his
________ shall not be
suspended.
A. Criminal liability C. Civil or pecuniary liabilities
B. Administrative liability D. Personal liability
31. Whenever a minor or either sex under 18 years of age at the time of the commission of a
grave or less grave
felony, is accused thereof, the court, after hearing the evidence in the proper proceedings,
instead of
pronouncing judgment of conviction, shall ___________ all further proceedings and shall
commit such minor
to the custody and care of a public or private charitable institution.
A. Proceed C. Set aside
B. Suspend D. Prolong
32. If the minor has behaved properly or has complied with the conditions imposed upon him
during his confinement,
in accordance with the provisions of Art. 80 he shall be returned to the ____________ in
order that the same
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part TwoPage 13
may order his final release.
A. DSWD C. Court
B. Parents D. Relatives / guardians
33. In case the minor fails to behave properly or to comply with the regulations of the institution
to which he was
committed, or he was found to be incorrigible he shall be returned to the court in order
that the same may
_________ corresponding to the crime committed by him.
A. Render the judgment C. Order extension of his commitment
B. Order his release D. Order his rehabilitation
34. The expenses for the maintenance of the minor delinquent confined in the institution to which
he has been
committed, shall be borne totally or partially by _________ or those persons liable to
support him, if they are
able to do so in the discretion of the court.
A. DSWD C. Institution
B. Parents or relatives D. State
35. Under the new law, the age of majority is ___________.
A. 21 years old C. 18 years old
B. 15 years old D. 16 years old
36. Any person sentenced to ___________ shall not be permitted to enter the place or places
designated in the
sentenced, nor within the radius therein specified.
A. Arresto Mayor C. Destierro
B. Aresto Menor D. Prision Mayor
37. The radius specified in the penalty of destierro shall be _____________.
A. Not less than 25kms. But not more than 200 kms.
B. Not less than 20 kms. But not more than 225 kms.
C. Not less than 5 kms. But not more than 125 kms.
D. Not less than 25 kms. But not more than 250 kms.
38. The penalty of ____________ shall be served in the municipal jail or in the house of the
defendant under the
surveillance of an officer of the law.
A. Arresto Mayor C. Prision correccional
B. Arresto Menor D. Prision Mayor
39. As the personal penalties, criminal liability of the accused is totally extinguished upon his
_________.
A. Incarceration C. Death
B. Conviction D. Confinement
40. The pecuniary liabilities of the convict is extinguished only when the death of the offender
occurs _______.
A. After the final judgment C. During the pendency of the case
B. Before the final judgment D. During the hearing of the case
41. It is not one of the grounds of extinction of criminal liability of the accused.
A. By voluntary surrender
B. By service of sentence
C. By absolute pardon
D. By prescription of the crime
42. Amado was change with homicide during the pendency of the case Amado died what will
happen to the
Case filed against him.
A. The case will continue to be heared.
B. The case will be suspended.
C. The case will set aside.
D. The case will be dismissed.
43. Berto was sentenced in the regional trial court. He appealed the case to the court of appeals.
During the
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part TwoPage 14
pendency of his appeal, Berto died. What will happen to his civil and criminal liability?
A. The civil and criminal liability is not extinguished?
B. The civil and environmental liability is extinguished?
C. The civil and criminal liability will be suspended.
D. The civil and criminal liability is set a side.
44. It is an act of grace proceeding from the power entrusted with the execution of the laws which
the individual
On whom it is bestowed from the punishment the law inflicts for the crime he has committed.
A. Parole C. Prescription of penalty
B. Pardon D. Prescription of crime
45. It is the forfeiture or loss of the right of the state to prosecute the offender after the lapse of a
certain time.
A. prescription of crime C. Parole
B. Prescription of penalty D. Probation
46. It is the loss or forfeiture of the right of the government to execute the final sentence after the
lapse of a certain
Time.
A. Amnesty C. Prescription of penalty
B. Pardon D. Prescription of criminal
47. Crimes punishable by reclusion perpetua or reclusion temporal shall prescribed in _____
A. 10yrs C. 20yrs.
B. 12yrs D. 15yrs.
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part TwoPage 15
57. It is considered a contract between the sovereign power of the executive and the convict that
the sovereign power
will release convict upon compliance with the condition.
A. Amnesty C. Conditional Pardon
B. Probation D. Reprieve
58. Any person who has been granted conditional pardon shall incurr the obligation of _____
otherwise, his non
compliance shall result in the revocation of the pardon.
A. Strictly complying the condition B. Ignoring the condition
C. Evading the condition D. Questioning the condition
59. It is the prerogative of the Executive to extend this to the offender at any time after the
imposition of the final
judgment.
A. Parole C. Probation
B. Amnesty D. Conditional Pardon
60. It is an Executive clemency given to the convicted offender after the offender has served the
minimum penalty
through the Board of Pardons and Parole.
A. Parole C. Amnesty
B. Pardon D. Probation
61. Every person criminally liable for a felony is also _____ liable.
A. Administratively C. Personally
B. Civily D. Socially
62. It is one of the extinguishment o9f civil liability.
A. Serving of sentence C. Amnesty
B. By compensation D. Parole
63. It is included in civil liability.
A. Restitution C. Indemnification for damages
consequential
B. Reparation of the damage caused D. All of the above
64. The civil liability for acts committed by a youthful offender shall be paid by the offenders
_____.
A. Parents C. Relative
B. Guardians D. All of the above
65. A prisoner who showed good conduct inside the penal institution shall be allowed a deduction
of his penalty for a
period of _____ for each month of good behavior during the first two years of his
imprisonment.
A. Five days C. Eight days
B. Ten days D. Fifteen days
66. During the 3rd to 5th year of his imprisonment the prisoner shall be allowed a deduction of
_____ for each month
of good behavior.
A. Fifteen days C. Five days
B. Eight days D. Ten days
67. During the 6th year until the tenth year, of his imprisonment, the prisoner shall be allowed a
deduction of _____for
each month of good behavior.
A. Eight days C. Ten days
B. Five days D. Fifteen days
68. During the eleventh and successive years of his imprisonment, the prisoner shall be allowed a
deduction of _____ for each month of good behavior.
A. Five days C. Ten days
B. Eight days D. Fifteen days
69. Ana was charged with the crime of adultery together with his boyfriend. Ana, the married
woman after conviction, her husband pardoned her alone is the pardon effective?
A. Yes because she was pardoned by her husband
B. No, the pardon should include the man to be effective.
C. Yes, because it is voluntary given by the husband,
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part TwoPage 16
D. No, because pardon can only be given by the Chief Executive
70. When a single act constitute two or more grave or less grave felonies, or when an offense is
necessary means for committing the other, the penalty for _____ shall be imposed in its
maximum.
A. The less serious crime C. The most serious crime
B. The light offense D. The most common crime
Questions 71 to 85
Write A if both statements are correct; B if first statement is correct and the second
is incorrect.
C if the first statement is incorrect and the second is correct; D if both
statements are incorrect.
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part TwoPage 17
___A__ 82. If the convict is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not more than one year, the
period of probation
shall not exceed two years. In all other cases, if he is sentenced to more than one
year, said probation
period shall not exceed six years
__B___ 83. Minor delinquents are not confined in a penitentiary to prevent their association with
matured and
hardened criminals. Their confinement in a charitable institution is considered a
penalty.
___C__ 84. Art. 80 of the RPC (Suspension of sentence of minors) is applicable only to light
felonies. If a light
felony is committed by a minor, he is not subject to imprisonment, because he is
entitled to a penalty of
one degree lower at least
___B__ 85. The criminal liability is totally extinguished by service of sentence. It is also
extinguished by means of
parole.
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part TwoPage 18
B. Education D. Sex
98. It is a circumstances present in a crime where it may increase or decrease the criminal
liability.
A. Exempting circumstances C. Alternative circumstances
B. Justifying circumstances D. Mitigating circumstances
99. It is a kind of aggravating circumstance that changes the nature of the crime. Example
treachery qualifies the
killing of a person to murder.
A. Qualifying aggravating C. Specific aggravating
B. Generic aggravating D. Inherent aggravating
100. They are persons criminally liable due to their direct participation in the commission of the
crime.
A. accessories C. Principals
B. Accomplices D. Co-accomplices
GOOD LUCK
FINAL EXAMINATION
(Law 2 – Criminal Law 2 (Book 2)
SY2011-2012/2nd Semester
INSTRUCTION: Select the correct answer for each of the following questions. Mark only one
answer for each item by shading the space corresponding to the letter of your choice on the
answer sheet provided. STRICTLY NO ERASURES ALLOWED.
1. What crime is committed when a person, through force, inserts his penis into another person’s mouth or
anal orifice?
A. Simple rape C. Qualified rape
B. Rape by sexual assault D. Acts of Lasciviousness
2. If a person wounds, assaults or beats another person causing deformity on the latter, the crime committed
is:
A. Serious physical injuries C. Slight physical injuries
B. Less serious physical injuries D. Mutilation
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part TwoPage 19
3. What crime is committed when a person, without intent to kill, inflicts upon another any serious physical
injury, by knowingly administering to him any injurious substances or beverages?
A. Serious physical injuries C. Mutilation
B. Less serious physical injuries D. Administering injurious substances or beverages
4. MAGDA, a prostitute, agreed to have sex with a customer for the amount of P1,000.00. While in the motel,
the customer started kissing MAGDA. MAGDA noticed that the customer has bad breath. Eventually, she
pulled away from the customer and refused to have sex with him. Angered by the refusal, the customer
forced himself on MAGDA who was able to accomplish his carnal desires on the latter. What crime, if any,
did the customer commit?
A. Rape C. Acts of lasciviousness
B. Seduction D. No crime was committed
6. NENE, a 10-year old girl, consented to have sex with her 20-year old neighbor HOMER who looks like John
Lloyd Cruz. What crime, if any, did HOMER commit?
A. Simple rape C. Qualified rape
B. Violation of child abuse law D. Qualified Seduction
7. What crime is committed when a police officer takes advantage of his position to rape another person?
A. Simple rape C. Sexual assault
B. Qualified rape D. None of these
8. Any private person who shall enter the dwelling of another against the latter’s will commits the crime of:
A. Qualified trespass to dwelling C. Trespass to property
B. Simple trespass to dwelling D. Violation of domicile
9. Due to the passage of the Anti-rape law of 1997, Rape is now classified as:
A. Crime against chastity C. Crime against liberty
B. Crime against persons D. None of these
10. If the person kidnapped or detained shall be a female, the crime is:
A. Kidnapping and serious illegal detention C. Slavery
B. Slight illegal detention D. Arbitrary detention
11. It is a crime committed by anyone who, under the pretext of reimbursing himself of a debt incurred by an
ascendant, guardian or person entrusted with the custody of a minor, shall, against the latter’s will, retain
him in his service.
A. Slavery C. Exploitation of minors
B. Abandoning a minor D. Exploitation of child labor
12. It is committed by any person who, with intent to gain but without violence against or intimidation of
persons nor force upon things, shall take personal property of another without the latter’s consent
A. Robbery C. Theft
B. Estafa D. Piracy
13. It is a felony committed by any person who shall threaten another with the infliction upon the person, honor,
property of the latter or of his family of any wrong amounting to a crime
A. Grave coercion C. Grave threats
B. Light coercion D. Light threats
14. Any person who shall deliberately cause to the property of another any damage that does not constitute
arson shall be guilty for what crime?
A. Unjust vexation D. Damage to property
B. Malicious mischief D. None of these
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part TwoPage 20
A. Offended spouse C. Both A and B
B. Guilty spouse D. The State
16. Any person who, having found lost property, shall fail to deliver the same to the local authorities or to its
owner shall be liable for what crime?
A. Theft C. Robbery
B. Estafa D. No crime was committed
17. LOLO ROMEO fondled the breast of her 15 year-old granddaughter WENDY. WENDY did not resist the
advances of her LOLO and in fact, she stated to him to continue what he is doing. What crime, if any, did
LOLO ROMEO commit?
A. Acts of Lasciviousness C. Seduction
B. Acts of Lasciviousness with the consent D. Attempted Rape
Of the offended party
19. A person who engages in the business of prostitution is liable for what felony?
A. Prostitution C. White slave trade
B. Slavery D. Vagrancy
20. While walking within the premises of a coconut plantation owned by JOEY, ROLAND saw a piece of coconut
on the ground. ROLAND decided to get the coconut and bring it home as a “pasalubong” to his son. What
crime, if any, did ROLAND commit?
A. Simple theft C. Robbery
B. Qualified theft D. Estafa
21. It is the seduction of a woman who is single and of good reputation, over twelve but under eighteen years
of age, and committed by means of deceit
A. Simple seduction C. Forcible abduction
B. Qualified seduction D. Acts of Lasciviousness
22. KURT has a longstanding grudge against his neighbor JIMI. One day, while JIMI was away, KURT
surreptitiously poisoned the cow of JIMI resulting in the death of the cow. What crime, if any, did KURT
commit?
A. Malicious mischief C. Unjust vexation
B. Violation of PD 533 (Anti-cattle rustling law) D. Physical injuries
23. MICHELLE MASIPAG worked as a housemaid and yaya of the one-week old son of the spouses PETER and
PAULA. When MICHELLE learned that her 70 year-old mother was seriously ill, she asked PETER for a cash
advance of P1,000.00, but PETER refused. One morning, MICHELLE gagged the mouth of PETER’s son with
stockings; placed the child in a box; sealed it with masking tape and placed the box in the attic. Later in the
afternoon, she demanded P5,000.00 as ransom for the release of his son. PETER did not pay the ransom.
Subsequently, MICHELLE disappeared.
After a couple of days, PETER discovered the box in the attic with his child already dead. According
to the
autopsy report, the child died of asphyxiation barely three minutes after the box was sealed. What crime/s
did
MICHELLE commit?
A. Kidnapping and serious illegal detention C. Kidnapping with homicide
B. Slight illegal detention with homicide D. Kidnapping and homicide
24. Unjust vexation is a:
A. Crime against security C. Crime against chastity
B. Crime against property D. None of these
25. Malicious mischief is a:
A. Crime against property C. Crime against persons
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part TwoPage 21
B. Crime against liberty D. None of these
26. SARAH and NONITO are sweethearts. As a birthday gift, NONITO gave SARAH a BlackBerry cell phone. Two
days later, SARAH broke up with NONITO because she caught the latter cheating on her. SARAH decided to
burn the cell phone that NONITO gave her. What crime, if any, did SARAH commit?
A. Arson C. Damage to property
B. Malicious mischief D. No crime was committed
27. In an interview aired on television, DINA uttered defamatory statements against CARMEN, a successful
and reputable businesswoman. What crime, if any, did DINA commit?
A. Slander C. Incriminating innocent persons
B. Libel D. No crime was committed
28. It consists in voluntarily, but without malice, doing or failing to do an act from which material damage
results by reason of inexcusable lack of precaution on the part of the person performing or failing to
perform such act.
A. Reckless imprudence C. Offense
B. Simple imprudence D. None of these
29. It is the abduction of any woman against her will and with lewd designs
A. Consented abduction C. Kidnapping
B. Forcible abduction D. None of these
30. SIMON entered the house of another without employing force or violence upon things. He was seen by
a maid who wanted to scream but was prevented from doing so because SIMON threatened her with a gun.
SIMON then took money and other valuables and left. What crime, if any, did SIMON commit?
31. Seduction is a:
A. Crime against honor C. Crime against chastity
B. Crime against persons D. Crime against liberty
32. Libel is a:
A. Crime against persons C. Crime against chastity
B. Crime against property D. Crime against honor
33. A fire broke out in a department store. SID, taking advantage of the confusion, entered the store and
carried away goods, which he later sold. What crime, if any, did SID commit?
A. Robbery C. Qualified theft
B. Theft D. Estafa
34. Any person who shall defraud another with unfaithfulness or abuse of confidence shall be liable for what
crime?
A. Theft C. Qualified theft
B. Robbery D. Estafa
35. DANTE and DIEGO ate at a restaurant near Our Lady of Fatima University in Valenzuela City. Because it
is lunch time, the restaurant was crowded. Realizing that they can leave the restaurant unnoticed without
having their bill for the food they ate, paid, the two clandestinely left the place. After two days, the police
apprehended the two. What crime, if any, did DANTE and DIEGO commit?
A. Theft C. Estafa
B. Qualfied theft D. No crime was committed
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part TwoPage 22
37. It is a crime committed by any person who, in any case other than those authorized by law, or without
reasonable ground therefore, shall arrest or detains another for the purpose of delivering him to the proper
authorities.
A. Arbitrary detention C. Illegal detention
B. Unlawful arrest D. Kidnapping
38. It is committed by any person who, without authority of law, shall by means of violence, threats or
intimidation, prevent another from doing something not prohibited by law, or compel him to do something
against his will, whether it be right or wrong.
a. Grave coercions c. Light coercions
b. Grave threats d. Light threats
39. Any person who shall orally threaten to do another any harm not constituting a felony is liable for what
crime, if any?
A. Coercion C. Unjust vexation
B. Other light threats D. No crime was committed
40. A private individual who, in order to discover the secrets of another, shall seize his papers or letters and
reveal the contents thereof is liable for what felony?
A. Infidelity in the custody of documents C. Theft
B. Discovering secrets through seizure of D. Estafa
Correspondence
42. To constitute a band under Art. 296 of the Revised Penal Code, there must be how many armed persons
taking part in a robbery?
A. More than three C. Three or more
B. Three D. Less than three
43. A person who possesses a picklock without lawful cause is liable for what crime, if any?
A. Theft C. Fencing
B. Possession of picklocks D. No crime was committed
44. A person who uses a picklock or other similar tools in the commission of robbery shall be guilty of what
crime?
A. Robbery C. Fencing
B. Possession of picklocks D. Robbery and possession of picklocks
45. CAROL and CINDY are sisters. Both are college students in the College of Criminology of Our Lady of
Fatima University in Valenzuela City. They both live with their parents. CAROL has a cute shih tzu dog; one
day while CAROL was away on a date, CINDY took the dog without the consent of CAROL and sold it to her
classmate. What crime did CINDY commit?
A. Robbery C. Malicious mischief
B. Estafa D. Theft
47. When more than three armed persons form a band of robbers for the purpose of committing robbery in
the highway, the felony committed is:
A. Brigandage C. Piracy
B. Robbery D. None of these
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part TwoPage 23
48. To be liable for violation of the Anti-Fencing law of 1979 (PD No. 1612), a person who, with intent to
gain for himself or another, shall buy, receive, possess, keep, acquire, conceal, sell, or dispose of, or shall
buy and sell, any item, article, object which he knows, or should be known to him, to have been derived
from the proceeds of the crime of:
A. Robbery or Theft C. Theft only
B. Robbery only D. Robbery, Theft, or Estafa
49. A person who shall contract a second or subsequent marriage before the former marriage has been
legally dissolved is liable for what crime?
A. Adultery C. Bigamy
B. Concubinage D. None of these
50. HERCULES kidnapped ACHILLES and subsequently detained him in a rented property somewhere in
Valenzuela City. After detaining ACHILLES for 10 hours, HERCULES called ACHILLES’ wife to ask for the
payment of P2 million in exchange for the liberty of her husband. ACHILLES’ wife immediately agreed and
deposited the P2 million in HERCULES’ bank account. Five hours have passed before HERCULES was able to
receive the money. Thereafter, he quickly released ACHILLES. What crime is committed?
A. Slight illegal detention C. Kidnapping and serious illegal detention
B. Grave coercion D. Forcible abduction
51. It is the taking, with intent to gain, of a motor vehicle belonging to another without the latter’s consent,
or by means of violence against or intimidation of persons, or by using force upon things
A. Robbery C. Carnapping
B. Qualified theft D. Brigandage
52. IVAN entered the house of DIEGO through the chimney, just like what Santa Claus does. While inside,
he took a laptop computer on the table and immediately left the house without anyone seeing him. What
crime, if any, did IVAN commit?
A. Robbery C. Theft
B. Trespass to dwelling D. Malicious mischief
53. It is a crime committed by any married woman who shall have sexual intercourse with a man not her
husband and by the man who has carnal knowledge of her, knowing her to be married.
A. Concubinage C. Seduction
B. Bigamy D. Adultery
54. DENNIS and CARMEN were legally separated. Their child FRANCIS, a minor was placed in the custody of
CARMEN, subject to monthly visitations by DENNIS. On one occasion, when DENNIS had FRANCIS in his
company, DENNIS decided not to return FRANCIS to his mother. Instead, DENNIS took FRANCIS with him
to Spain where he intended for them to reside permanently. What crime, if any, did DENNIS commit?
A. Kidnapping and serious illegal detention C. Kidnapping and failure to return a minor
B. Kidnapping and slight illegal detention D. Corruption of minors
56. Which of the following is no longer a crime/s, according to the decision of the Supreme Court in
Valenzuela vs People (GR No. 160188, June 21, 2007):
A. Frustrated theft c. Both a and b
B. Frustrated robbery d. None of these
57. If someone was killed in the course of the commission of robbery, the crime committed is:
A. Robbery and homicide C. Homicide
B. Robbery D. Robbery with homicide
58. A person who, by means of violence, shall seize anything belonging to his debtor for the purpose of
applying the same to the payment of the debt is liable for what felony?
A. light threats C. Light coercions
B. Fraudulent insolvency D. None of these
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part TwoPage 24
59. By using a slingshot, RONNIE deliberately hit the favorite duck of his LOLA TASYA. As a consequence,
the duck died. RONNIE was charged with malicious mischief. RONNIE contended that he is exempt from
criminal liability pursuant to Art.332 of the Revised Penal Code. Is RONNIE correct?
A.Yes, because RONNIE is a descendant of his LOLA, thus exempt under Art. 332 of the Penal
Code
B. Yes, because RONNIE is a minor
C. No, because RONNIE committed a crime
D. No, because RONNIE intended to kill the duck of his LOLA
62. JOAN and JANE are college classmates. They are both of legal age. JOAN burned the pen of JANE worth
P10.00 because JANE did not allow JOAN to copy her assignment in school. What crime, if any, did JOAN
commit?
A. Malicious mischief C. Unjust vexation
B. Arson D. No crime was committed
66. DONDON, a tricycle driver, plied his usual route using a Suzuki motorcycle with a sidecar. One evening,
JOJO rode on the sidecar, poked a knife at DONDON and instructed him to go near the bridge. Upon
reaching the bridge, JOJO alighted from the motorcycle and suddenly stabbed DONDON several times until
he was dead. JOJO fled from the scene taking the motorcycle with him. What crime/s did JOJO commit?
A. Homicide C. Carnapping with homicide
B. Carnapping and murder D. Carnapping and homicide
67. At about 11:00 in the evening, LANDO forced his way inside the house of ROGER. TIBURCIO, ROGER’s
son, saw LANDO and accosted him. LANDO pulled a knife and stabbed TIBURCIO on his abdomen. ROGER
heard the commotion and went out of his room. LANDO, who is about to escape, assaulted ROGER.
TIBURCIO suffered injuries, which were not for the timely medical attendance, would have caused his
death. ROGER sustained injuries that incapacitated him for 25 days. How many crime/s did LANDO commit?
A. 1 C. 3
B. 2 D. 4
68. In question no. 67, what kind of physical injuries did ROGER sustain?
A. Serious physical injuries C. Slight physical injuries
B. Less serious physical injuries D. Mutilation
69. In the crime of qualified seduction, the offended party should be a virgin. What kind of virginity does the
law contemplate?
A. Physical virginity C. Both a and b
B. Moral virginity D. None of these
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part TwoPage 25
A. Deceit C. Lustful
B. Prejudice D. Intent
71. NOAH proposed to his friend MARLON to kidnap ALLIE so that they can rape her. MARLON agreed. On
the date of their plan, the two had a change of heart and did not push through with the scheme. What
crime, if any, did NOAH and MARLON commit?
A. Attempted kidnapping C. Attempted rape
B. Attempted forcible abduction D. No crime was committed
73. After raping the complainant in her house, the accused struck a match to smoke a cigarette before
departing from the scene. The brief light from the match allowed him to notice a watch in her wrist. He
demanded that she hand over the watch. When she refused, he forcibly grabbed it from her. What crime/s
did the accused commit?
A. Robbery with rape C. Rape and theft
B. Rape and robbery D. Qualified rape
74. An accused charged with violation of PD No. 1612 (Anti-fencing law of 1979) would have been
an____________ in theft or robbery had not the charge filed against him been fencing.
A. Principal C. Accessory
B. Accomplice D. None of these
78. PD No. 533, otherwise known as the Anti-cattle rustling law of 1974 is:
A. Part of the Revised Penal Code C. Either a or b
B. A special penal law D. None of these
79. It is the taking of personal property out of the possession of the owner
A. Robbery C. Asportation
B. Seizure D. None of these
80. If a person enters the dwelling or property of another without the consent of the owner, but the purpose of
such entry is to render some aid to humanity or justice, what crime, if any, did the person who entered
commit?
A. Trespass to dwelling C. Violation of domicile
B. Trespass to property D. No crime was committed
81. TT kidnapped KK in a dimly lit street. XX, a passerby saw what happened. TT noticed that XX witnessed his
act. As a consequence, TT killed XX. What is the crime committed?
A. Kidnapping with homicide C. Kidnapping and murder
B. Kidnapping and homicide D. None of these
82. A 7-year old child was raped by the friend of her father. What crime is committed?
A. Qualified rape C. Simple rape
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part TwoPage 26
B. Rape by sexual assault D. Seduction
83. By using a picklock, ABET ALINLANGAN successfully entered the house of POPOY. As ABET was about to get
the ipad and iphone on top of the table, he noticed POPOY descending from the stairs. Alarmed, he went to
POPOY and killed him. What is the crime committed?
A. Attempted robbery with homicide c. Attempted theft with homicide
B. Attempted robbery and homicide d. Attempted theft and homicide
84. What is the effect if the offender marries the offended party in rape, granting all the requisites for a valid
marriage are present?
A. The crime is extinguished C. both A and B
B. The criminal liability is extinguished D. No effect
85. DOY, a gigolo from Manila raped SISA, a barrio lass in Nueva Ecija. At the time of the commission of the
rape, DOY had no knowledge that SISA was a mental retardate. What is the crime committed?
A. Simple rape C. Sexual assault
B. Qualified rape D. Seduaction
86. AUBREY, a gorgeous ‘colegiala’ but a shoplifter went to SM Valenzuela and proceeded to the women’s wear
section. The saleslady was of the impression that she brought to the fitting room three (3) pieces of
swimsuits of different colors. When she came out of the fitting room, she returned only two (2) pieces to
the clothes rack. The saleslady became suspicious and alerted the store security. AUBREY was stopped by
the security before she could leave the store and brought to the office of the store manager. The security
and the manager searched her and found her wearing the third swimsuit under her blouse and pants. What
is the crime committed?
A. Attempted theft C. Consummated theft
B. Frustrated theft D. Robbery
87. The main difference between kidnapping and forcible abduction is the presence or absence of:
A. Taking of a person C. detention
B. Lewd design D. None of these
92. SIMPLICIO is married to the sister of DOLLY, and the three (3) live together in a house located in Malabon
City. On several occasions, DOLLY’s dog would bark at SIMPLICIO every time he arrives at past midnight.
One time, after arriving in the house at around 2 o’ clock in the morning, DOLLY’s dog barked continuously
at SIMPLICIO. In a fit of anger, SIMPLICIO entered the house, took a bolo and killed the dog. What is the
crime committed?
A. Malicious mischief C. Mutilation
B. Unjust vexation D. None of these
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part TwoPage 27
D. No, because killing of a dog is not a crime
95. JERRY set the house of RAMONA on fire by way of revenge against the latter. JERRY did not know that
RAMONA was inside. RAMONA died because of the fire. What crime or crimes did JERRY commit?
A. Arson C. Arson with homicide
B. Homicide D. Arson and homicide
96. In question no. 95, suppose JERRY knew that RAMONA was inside, what crime/crimes did JERRY commit?
A. Homicide C. Arson and murder
B. Murder D. Arson and homicide
97. In question no. 95, suppose before setting it on fire, JERRY entered the house and killed RAMONA. Then
JERRY set the house on fire to hide the body of RAMONA. What crime/crimes did JERRY commit?
A. Murder C. Arson with homicide
B. Arson D. Murder and arson
100. It is a law that defines crimes, treats of their nature and provides for their punishment?
A. Criminal law C. Special penal law
B. Criminal jurisprudence D. Civil law
-----NOTHING FOLLOWS-----
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part TwoPage 28
A. All of these
B. The elements constituting the felony
C. The nature of the offense
D. The manner of committing the felony
A
4. A person who gives testimonial evidence to a judiciary tribunal
A. Witness
B. Defense
C. Prosecution
D. Clerk of Court
A
5. What crime can be charged of one who retains a minor in his
service against the minor’s will and under the pretext of reimbursing
himself of a debt incurred by the child/s parents?
A. white slavery
B. exploitation of child labor
C. inducing a minor
D. kidnapping B
6. A, a notary public, issued a supposed copy of a deed of sale,
when in fact no such deed oæ sale was prepared by him. A is liable
for
A. Estafa
B. falsification
C. Forgery
D. All of these
A
7. Refers to family history or descent transmitted from one
generation to another
A. Pedigree
B. Inheritance
C. Tradition Heritage
A
8. What kind of presumption involves the mental process by which
the existence of one fact is inferred from proof of some other facts?
A. Conclusive
B. of"law
C. Disputable
D. of fact
C
9. During the pendency of his criminal case, A died due to heart
attack. His untimely death resulted in
A. termination of proceedings
B. suspension of the case
C. postponement of the case
D. dismissal of the case for lack of respondent
D
10. How may an ordinary citizen give his opinion regarding the
handwriting of a person?
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part TwoPage 29
A. when he has to testify only as to the mental and emotional state of
the one who authored the handwriting
B. when it is the handwriting of one whom he has sufficient familiarity
C. when he is a questioned document examiner
D. when he is a graduate of criminology
B
11. Obligations imposed upon a party to establish their alleged fact by
proof are termed as "burden of proof" what is its Latin translation?
A. Factum probans
B. Factum probandum
C. Owe probandi
D. Owes probandi
D
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part TwoPage 30
A. Capacity of observation
B. Capacity of recollection
C. Capacity of Knowledge
D. Capacity of communication
C
17. That kind of evidence which can not be rebutted or overcome
A. Primary
B. Real
C. Best
D. Conclusive
D
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part TwoPage 31
D. Post mortem statement
B
23. What crime is committed against mankind, and whose jurisdiction
consequently recognizes no territorial limits?
A. Piracy
B. Felonies
C. Theft
D. Suicide
A
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part TwoPage 32
29. What should the court do when the offense is less serious physical
injuries and the offense proved is serious physical injuries and the
defendant may be convicted only of the offense as charged?
A. do not dismiss the action
B. do not dismiss the action but should order the filing of a new
information
C. dismiss the action
D. stay with the action and decide accordingly to avoid double jeopardy
B
36. In case of oral defamation, where the priest is the only available
witness, can a priest testify as to the alleged defamatory words given
to him by the accused during confession?
A. privilege given by a patient to a doctor
B. privilege given to a husband to a wife
C. privilege communication given to an attorney by a client
D. privilege communication given by a penitent to a priest
D
37. An aggravating circumstance which generally apply to all crimes such
as dwelling, night time or recidivism.
A. Generic
B. Specific
C. Qualifying
D. Inherent
A
38. Who are criminally liable, when having knowledge of the commission
of the crime, without having principally participated therein, takes part
subsequent to the commission, either in profiting by the effects of the
crime or by concealing or destroying the body of the crime?
A. Witnesses
B. Accessories
C. Principals
D. Accomplices
B
39. They are aggravating circumstance which change the nature of the
crime, e.i. homicide to murder in case of treachery
A. Generic
B. Specific
C. Qualifying
D. Inherent
C
40. Which of the following aggravating circumstances may not be offset
by mitigating circumstances?
A. Treachery
B. Night time
C. Ignominy
D. Taking advantage of superior strength
A
41. What are the infractions of mere rules of convenience designed to
secure a more orderly regulation of the affairs of society?
A. Mala prohibita
B. Felonies
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part TwoPage 34
C. Violation of ordinance
D. Mala in se
B
42. What doctrine allows evidence obtained by police officers in an illegal
search and seizure to be used against the accused?
A. Silver platter
B. Exclusionary doctrine
C. Fruit of the poisonous tree
D. Miranda ruling
A
43. Mr. Santos went to the United States. While he was there, he courted
Ms. Jane an American. They eventually got married. When Mr.
Santos returned to thePhilippines his wife, Alona filed an action
against him for violating their marriage. What is the liability of Mr.
Santos, if any?
A. None of these
B. Adultery
C. Concubinage
D. Bigamy
D
44. What is the liability of the jail guard if the evasion of a prisoner should
take place through his negligence?
A. delivering prisoners from jails
B. evasion through negligence
C. reckless imprudence
D. conniving with or consenting to evasion
B
45. A treasury warrant was payable to A or his representative. B took
possession of the warrant, wrote the name of A, endorsed it at the
back and was able to encash it. B is liable for
A. Estafa
B. all of these
C. falsification
D. forgery
B
46. A person who has within a period of 10 years from the date of
release or last conviction is said to have been found guilty of the
same offense particularly those of physical injuries, estafa, theft and
robbery is considered as a:
A. recidivist
B. habitual Delinquent
C. delinquent
D. quasi-recidvist
B
47. What is the means sanctioned by the rules of ascertaining in a judicial
proceeding the truth respecting a matter of fact?
A. Evidence
B. Procedure
C. Investigation
D. Trial
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part TwoPage 35
A
48. Whenever more than three armed malefactors shall have acted
together in the commission of an offense it is deemed to have been
committed by:
A. Group
B. Band
C. Brigands
D. Team
B
49. What is that statement made by a wounded person shortly after he
received several bolo stabs narrating therein the whole incident to
another which is admissible in evidence as part of
A. res nullus
B. res ipsa loquitur
C. res judicata
D. res gestae
D
50. A, B, C are boardmates of D. A, B and C conspire to kill X, a witch,
because he is perceived to cause misery among many in the
barangay. D knew about it all along. After the conspiracy but made no
move to report to the authorities. In this case, D
A. is liable for murder
B. is an accessory to the crime
C. is a conspirator
D. incurs no criminal liability
C
51. “Aberratio ictus” in which the perpetrator is criminally liable means
A. mistaken identity
B. mistake in the blow
C. results are less than intended
D. result is greater than intended
A
52. What acts punishable by law are either intended to directly impute to
an innocent person the commission of crime or which are calculated
to blemish the honor or reputation of a person by means of intrigue?
A. oral defamation
B. blackmail
C. slander
D. incriminatory machinations
D
53. A, with intent to kill, fired a revolver at B. He inflicted a fatal wound. A
brought B to a hospital, and due to timely medical assistance, B
survived. What crime did A commit?
A. physical injuries
B. attempted felony
C. frustrated felony
D. no criminal liability
C
54. Breach of allegiance to a government, committed by a person who
owes allegiance to it.
A. Treason
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part TwoPage 36
B. Adherence to the enemy
C. Espionage
D. Levying war
A
55. What is the order in writing issued in the name of the People of the
Philippines, signed by a judge and directed to a peace officer
commanding him to search for personal property described therein
and bring it before the court?
A. warrant of arrest
B. Search warrant
C. Subpoena
D. Summons
B
56. It requires the concurrence of two things, that there being an actual
assembly of men and for such purpose of executing a treasonable
design by force
A. Aid or comfort
B. Adherence to the enemy
C. Levying war
D. All of the foregoing
C
57. Under the new Constitution, who is empowered to order or change
the venue or place of trial in order to avoid miscarriage of justice?
A. executive judge
B. supreme court
C. regional trial courts
D. regional state prosecutor
B
58. What rule is observed when generally, there can be no evidence of a
writing, the contents of which is the subject matter of inquiry
A. secondary evidence
B. parole evidence
C. corollary evidence
D. best evidence
A
59. What kind of executive clemency wipes away the guilt of the
convicted person, subject to the three limitations to be executed by
the President?
A. Pardon
B. Amnesty
C. Reprieve
D. penalty
A
60. A person having knowledge of the plans to commit treason and fails
to disclose such information to the governor, fiscal or mayor is guilty
of what crime?
A. Treason
B. Conspiracy to commit treason
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part TwoPage 37
C. Espionage
D. Misprision of Treason
D
61. What crime is committed when the offender, acting under a single
criminal resolution, commits a series of acts in the same place at
about the same penal provision?
A. Composite
B. Compound
C. Continuing
D. complex
C
62. In what instance can alibi (the weakest defense) acquire
commensurate strength in evidential value?
A. when it changes the burden of proof
B. when evidence for the prosecution is strong
C. where no positive and proper identification has been satisfactorily made
D. when questions on whether or not accused committed the offense is clear
B
63. It is a forcible depredation on the high seas without lawful authority
and done with animo furandi and in the spirit and intention of
universal hostility
A. Mutiny
B. Piracy
C. Espionage
D. Sedition
B
64. What is that rule where an offended party may intervene in the
proceeding personally or through a counsel?
A. Miranda Rule
B. rule of facilitation
C. rule of intervention
D. rule of reservation
A
65. Refers to resistance to a superior officer, or the raising of commotions
and disturbance on board a ship against authority of the commander
A. Mutiny
B. Piracy
C. Espionage
D. Sedition
A
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part TwoPage 38
A. Recidivism
B. Insanity
C. Treachery
D. Intoxication
C
68. What would be the nature of action for a person over nine years of
age and under fifteen to incur criminal liability?
A. act with discernment
B. act carelessly or negligently
C. show criminal intent
D. show malice
A
69. Who is a person in authority among the following:
A. Policeman
B. MMDA enforcer
C. barangay captain
D. barangay tanod
A
70. What kind of aggravating circumstance is present when a person
commits any of the crimes against person, employing such means,
methods or forms in the execution thereof which tend specially to
ensure its execution without risk to himself arising from the defense
which the offended partly might make?
A. capital punishment
B. complex crime
C. continuous offense
D. civil interdiction
A
71. A is known for writing obscene material. One of his writings, entitled
“Hayop”, was stolen from his office and was published by someone.
The authorities got hold of the obscene magazine. A is
A. not liable at all
B. liable for obscene publication (as co-publisher)
C. liable for pornography
D. liable for the obscene publications (as author)
A
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part TwoPage 39
73. How should the plea to a complaint or information be made by the
accused?
A. personally, in open court and of the record
B. by the approval of the court and upon written request by the accused
C. through counsel in open court and on the record
D. personally by written motion
B
Situation 1 – A and B are neighbors. During a drinking spree, A
punched B without any provocation. B’s injury required medical
attendance for a period of seven (7) days. Immediately thereafter
SP01 T. Anga whose help was sought by B, took the statement of B
and did not know what to do.
77. Assuming that A was drunk at the time that he committed the offense,
his drunkenness would be considered as:
A. mitigating circumstance
B. aggravating circumstance
C. exempting circumstance
D. alternative circumstance
D
Situation 2 – A and B who are brother-in-laws, are also mortal
enemies. One time, A threatened to kill B. A has a common
reputation of being a killer. One night in a lighted place, A suddenly
stabbed B from behind. Before A could escape, B was able to identify
him. As B lay wounded, SP01 Mahabagin responded and to whom B
pointed to A as the one who attacked him. SP01 arrested B on the
basis of such declaration.
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part TwoPage 40
78. Based on situation # 2, which of the following best describes the
statement of A?
A. Circumstantial
B. Corroborative
C. Hearsay
D. Direct
C
79. What crime was committed by A that night time of the stabbing?
A. Parricide
B. Grave threats
C. Homicide
D. Murder
A
80. Assuming that B was dying at the time that he informed SP01
Mahabagin of the identity of his notorious assailant and believing that
he was dying at the time, but he did not actually die, what basis could
be used to establish the identify of A?
A. Common reputation
B. res gestae
a. dying declaration
b. declaration against interest
B
81. In the foregoing case, B’s statement identifying A as his assailant may
not be considered a dying declaration because:
A. B’s death is indispensable
B. The declaration was not written
C. No mention was made that B’s wound was fatal
D. B has a grudge against A
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part TwoPage 41
A. Admissible because A was informed of his right to counsel but he
could not afford to hire one
B. Inadmissible because A must be provided with counsel free of charge
C. admissible because A did not insist on his right to counsel and he
voluntarily waived it
D. admissible in evidence against him because all the conditions were
present in the waiver
A
84. Assuming that the public persecutor on the basis of the now written
confession of A, who waived his right of counsel because he could
not afford one, filed the information against him and the judge after
trial, convicted A on the basis of his written confession. A would like
to appeal his case to a higher court. The appeal should be filed -
A. with 30 days from the time A’s counsel de oficio who was absent of
the time of the promulgation received a written copy of the judgment
of conviction.
B. within 30 days from the date the case was submitted for resolution
C. within 15 days from the promulgation of judgment
D. within 15 days from the date of pre-trial conference
A
85. Assuming that A’s appeal was filed 30 days after his counsel de oficio
learned of the judgment, the appeal should
A. Not be given due course, because the judgment which were rendered
after trial was obviously correct anyway
B. be given due course because it was filed within the reglamentary
period
C. not be given due course because the confession was really
inadmissible against A and the judgment of conviction must be
reversed
D. None of these
A
86. The Judiciary Reorganization Act of 1980 (BP Blg 129) took effect on
A. January 17, 1983
B. August 1, 1983
C. January 1, 1983
D. December 1, 1980
D
87. Criminal jurisdiction over the subject matter shall be determined by
the
A. law enforced at the time of the commission of the offense
B. law enforced at the time of trial
C. law enforced at the time of the institution/filing of the offense
D. law enforced at the time of the discovery of the offense
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part TwoPage 42
A
88. Criminal procedure is a
A. substantive law
B. constitutional law
C. administrative law
D. procedural or remedial law
D
89. The stage of a judicial proceeding whereby the accused shall be
informed of the nature and cause of the accusation against him, in
compliance of the mandate of the consultation and the rules and in
order to fix the identity of the accused is
A. criminal investigation
B. pre-trial conference
C. preliminary investigation
D. arraignment and plea
D
90. Defined as the taking of a person into custody in order that he may be
bound to answer for the commission of an offense
A. None of these
B. Custody
C. Detention or imprisonment
D. Investigation
A
91. Under the law, the warrant of arrest shall remain valid unless
A. after the lapse of ten days from its issuance
B. it is served or lifted
C. after the lapse of the period for the police to execute the same
D. after the lapse of the period for the police to make his report
A
92. The procedure which allows the affidavit or counter-affidavit of the
parties or their witnesses to constitute as their direct oral testimony in
the case, subject however to cross examination
A. Revised Rule on Summary Procedure
B. Revised Rules on Criminal Procedure
C. Revised Rules on Evidence
D. Revised Penal Code
A
93. The right of an accused to bail is a matter of right in those cases -
A. falling within the jurisdiction of the RTC before or after conviction,
except capital offenses
B. falling within the jurisdiction of the MTC before or after conviction
C. falling within the jurisdiction of the RTC where the penalty for the
offense does not exceed twenty years imprisonment
D. all of these
A
94. Preliminary investigation is required in those criminal cases where the
penalty provided by law for the offense charged is
A. over 6 years imprisonment regardless of the amount of fine
B. exceeding 6 years imprisonment irrespective of the amount of fine
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part TwoPage 43
C. at least 4 years, 2 months and 1 day of imprisonment irrespective of
the amount of fine
D. not exceeding 6 years imprisonment irrespective of the amount of
fine
C
95. Violation of City or municipal ordinance are within the
A. concurrent jurisdiction of the RTC and MTC
B. exclusive original jurisdiction of the RTC
C. exclusive jurisdiction of the Family Court
D. exclusive original jurisdiction of the MTC
D
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part TwoPage 44
C. RA No 7438
D. RA No 7659
C
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part TwoPage 45
1. It is a branch or division of law which defines crimes, threats of their nature and
provides for their punishment.
A. criminal evidence
B. criminal law
C. criminal jurisprudence
D. criminal procedure
2. These are the characteristics of criminal law, EXCEPT:
A. generality
B. territoriality
C. constitutionality
D. prospective
3. These are the exceptions to generality.
A. public international law
B. treaty stipulations
C. preferential application
D. ex-post facto law
4. These are the elements of felony, EXCEPT:
A. acts or omission
B. punished by RPC
C. punished by laws
D. deceit or fault
5. These are the requisites of mistake of fact as a defense, EXCEPT:
A. act done would have been
B. intention of the accused must be
C. resulting injury is due to the act of victim
D. mistake must be without fault or carelessness
6. The offender perform all acts of execution which would produce a felony as a
consequence, but which do not produce it by reason of causes independent of the
will of perpetrator.
A. Consummated
B. Frustrated
C. Attempted
D. all of the above
7. When two or more persons come to an agreement concerning commission of felony
and decide to commit it.
A. Treason
B. Rebellion
C. conspiracy
D. sedition
8. Law attaches capital punishment or penalty or any of their periods are afflictive.
A. less grave
B. grave
C. less serious
D. light
9. Are those which, if present in the commission of the crime, do not entirely free the
actor from criminal liability?
A. justifying circumstances
B. exempting circumstances
C. mitigating circumstances
D. aggravating circumstances
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part ThreePage 46
10. Those which, if attendant in the commission of crime, served to increase the
penalty but without exceeding the maximum penalty prescribed by the law.
A. aggravating circumstances
B. alternative circumstances
C. exempting circumstances
D. less serious
11. These are the elements of self-defense, EXCEPT:
A. unlawful aggression
B. sufficient provocation
C. reasonable necessity
D. elements of self defense
12. These are the elements of irresistible force, EXCEPT:
A. an act is required by law to be done
B. compulsion is by means of physical force
C. physical force is irresistible
D. physical force comes from a third person
13. These are the elements of uncontrollable fear, EXCEPT:
A. threat which causes fear is of an evil greater or at least equal to that he is
required to commit
B. promise an evil of such gravity and imminence ordinary man would have
succumbed
C. all of the above
D. none of the above
14. These are the elements of insuperable or lawful cause, EXCEPT:
A. an act is required by law to be done
B. person committed a crime but no penalty
C. person fails to perform such act
D. failure to perform due to insuperable cause
15. It is an aggravating circumstance that applies to a particular felony like cruelty in
crime against person.
A. generic
B. specific
C. qualifying
D. inherent
16. When the offender has committed offenses which are embraced in the same title of
the Revised Penal Code, he is -
A. habitual delinquent
B. quasi-recidivist
C. recidivist
D. reiteracionist
17. The following elements must be proved by the prosecution in evident
premeditation, EXCEPT:
A. time when the offender determined to commit the crime
B. based upon external acts and must be evident
C. act manifestly indicating determination
D. sufficient lapse of time between determinations
18. These are the requirements of alternative circumstances, EXCEPT:
A. relationship
B. intoxication
C. degree of education
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part ThreePage 47
D. drug addiction
19. These are the principals in the commission of grave, less grave and light felonies,
EXCEPT:
A. take direct part in the commission of crime
B. directly by force or induce others to commit it
C. has intention to procure commission of crime
D. cooperate in the commission of offense by another
20. These are the effects of pardon made by the Chief Executive to convicted criminal
offenders, EXCEPT:
A. extinguishes criminal liability
B. right to vote and be voted upon
C. does not exempt payment of civil liability
D. does not restore right to hold public office
21. The elements of complex crime proper are as follows, EXCEPT:
A. that at least two offenses are committed
B. that one or some of the offenses must be
C. both the offenses must be punished by the same statute
D. several light felonies resulting from single act
22. It is a single crime consisting of series of acts arising from one criminal action.
A. complex crimes
B. continuing crime
C. compound crime
D. impossible crime
23. It is a minor who is over 9 years, but under 18 years of age at the time of
commission of an offense.
A. juvenile delinquents
B. youthful
C. delinquent minors
D. delinquent children
24. It is an act committed or omitted in violation of a public law forbidding or
commanding it.
A. crime
B. felony
C. infractions
D. offenses
25. This is otherwise known as the Revised Penal Code of the Philippines.
A. Act No. 3815
B. PD 1508
C. Admin. Order No. 94
D. Act No. 3851
26. These are the elements of the crime of treason, EXCEPT:
A. the offender is a Filipino citizen or an alien residing in the Philippines
B. there is a war in which the Philippines is
C. the offender is either levies against the government or adhere to the enemies,
giving them aid or Comfort.
D. breach of allegiance to a government committed by a person who owes
allegiance to the government
27. It is forcible depredation on the high seas, without lawful authority and done with
animo flurandi and in the spirit and intention of universal hostility.
A. Mutiny
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part ThreePage 48
B. Piracy
C. Robbery
D. qualified piracy
28. These are the elements of the crime of arbitrary detention, EXCEPT:
A. the offender is a public officer or employee
B. that he detains a person
C. the detention is without legal grounds
D. a person is detained in confinement
29. These are the crimes known as the violation of domicile, EXCEPT:
A. opening of tables and drawers by the police
B. entering a dwelling against the will of the owner
C. search warrant maliciously and abusively served
D. searching domicile without witnesses
30. It is committed by rising publicly and taking arms against the government, depriving
the Chief Executives and Legislature of the powers and prerogatives.
A. rebellion
B. coup d’ etat
C. sedition
D. treason
31. It is a swift attack, accompanied by violence, intimidation, threat, strategy or stealth,
directed against duly constituted authorities.
A. Rebellion
B. Sedition
C. coup d’ etat
D. disloyalty
32. It is known as the Violence Against Women and Their Children Act.
A. RA 8553
B. RA 7659
C. RA 9262
D. RA 7610
33. It is an order in writing issued by the judge commanding any peace officer to search
the premises and seize the property described therein and bring it before the court.
A. warrant of arrest
B. subpoena duces tecum
C. search warrant
D. seizure order
34. These are the elements of direct assault as crime against public order, EXCEPT:
A. the offender employs force or intimidation
B. the aim of the offender is to attain rebellion
C. that there is no public uprising
D. without uprising on the occasion of such performance
35. These are the elements of direct assault as crime against persons, EXCEPT:
A. the offender makes an attack
B. the person assaulted is a person in authority
C. there is no public uprising
D. the overt-act performed is against public order
36. These are the elements of the crimes of indirect assault, EXCEPT:
A. that a person is in authority is the victim
B. that a person comes to the aid of such authority
C. that the offender makes use of force or intimidation
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part ThreePage 49
D. the offender party is a private person
37. These are the crimes classified under public disorders, EXCEPT:
A. tumults and other disturbances of public order
B. unlawful use of means of publication and utterances
C. alarms and scandals & delivering prisoners from jails
D. resistance to authority and serious disobedience
38. It is improper performance of some act which might lawfully be done.
A. Misfeasenace
B. Malfeasance
C. nonfeasance
D. dereliction of duty
39. These are the elements of the crime of indirect bribery, EXCEPT:
A. the offender is a public officer
B. the public office accepts
C. agree to perform an act constituting a crime
D. the said gifts are offered by reason of his office
40. These are the elements of the crime of parricide, EXCEPT:
A. a person is killed
B. the deceased is killed by the accused
C. the deceased is father, mother, or child
D. the relationship must be real and legitimate
41. It is the unlawful killing of any person which is not parricide or infanticide, provided
that any of the following circumstances are present, i.e., treachery, in consideration
of price & with evident premeditation.
A. Homicide
B. Murder
C. Manslaughter
D. abortion
42. These are the elements of the crime of homicide, EXCEPT:
A. The person was killed without any justifying
B. The accused had the intention to kill, which is presumed
C. The killing was not attended by any qualifying circumstances
D. Treachery, evident premeditation, with cruelty, and by means of fire, poison,
explosion, etc.
43. It exists when there are at least four persons who are armed took part in
disturbance or are provided with means of violence.
A. tumultuous affray
B. public disorders
C. physical injuries
D. prison riots
44. It is the act constituting of shooting to another with any firearm, without intent to kill.
A. discharge of firearms
B. illegal firing
C. indiscriminate firing
D. accidental fire
45. It is defined as the killing of any child less than three days of age, whether the killer
is the parent or grandparent, any other relative of the child, or stranger.
A. abortion
B. homicide
C. infanticide
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part ThreePage 50
D. parricide
46. It is defined as the willful killing of the fetus in the uterus, or the violent expulsion of
the fetus from the maternal womb which results in the death of the said fetus.
A. Abortion
B. Homicide
C. Infanticide
D. parricide
47. It is a formal or regular combat previously concerted between two parties in the
presence of two or more seconds.
A. Duel
B. Dual
C. challenger
D. instigators
48. It is means lopping or the clipping off of some part of the body.
A. injuries
B. mutilation
C. castration
D. decapitation
49. These are the ways and means how the crime of serious physical injuries
committed, EXCEPT:
A. by wounding and beating
B. by assaulting as provided by Art. 263
C. by administering injurious substance
D. intentionally mutilating others
50. It is a crime committed by any person, either male or female who shall commit an
act of sexual assault.
A. Adultery
B. Concubinage
C. rape
D. acts of lasciviousness
51. It is the essential element or act which makes the offense of kidnapping.
A. deprivation of an offended party’s liberty
B. ransom money in-exchange of the victims
C. with the use of force, violence and intimidation
D. that the offender is a private individual
52. These are the elements of the crime of unlawful arrest, EXCEPT:
A. the offender arrests or detains another persons
B. the purpose is to deliver him to proper
C. the arrest or detention is not authorized by the law
D. without warrant of arrest issued by the court
53. It is the taking of property of another with intent to gain, by means of violence, or
intimidation of any person.
A. theft
B. robbery
C. coercion
D. grave threats
54. It is when more than three armed malefactors take part in the commission of
robbery.
A. robbery in band
B. brigandage
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part ThreePage 51
C. carnappers
D. theft
55. It is committed by more than three armed persons for the purpose of committing
robbery or kidnapping for extortion.
A. robbery in band
B. brigandage
C. carnappers
D. theft
56. It is with intent to gain, without violence or intimidation of persons, force upon
things, and without the latter’s consent.
A. Robbery
B. Theft
C. brigandage
D. qualified theft
57. These are the elements of the crime of qualified theft, EXCEPT:
A. it is committed by domestic helper
B. committed with grave abuse of confidence
C. stolen were motor vehicle, mail matter, large cattle
D. theft committed by a laborer in construction
58. It is meant the taking away of woman from her house or the place where she may
be for the purpose of carrying her to another place with intent to marry or corrupt
her.
A. Seduction
B. Abduction
C. Adultery
D. concubinage
59. It consists in voluntary, but without malice, doing or falling to do an act from which
material damage results by reason of inexcusable lack of precaution.
A. simple imprudence
B. reckless imprudence
C. criminal imprudence
D. criminal negligence
60. These are the elements of the crime of qualified bribery, EXCEPT:
A. the offender is entrusted with law enforcement
B. the offender is liable to direct and indirect
C. consideration of any promise, gift or present
D. the offender refrains from arresting offenders
61. This is an act amending the provision of PD 1866, otherwise known as illegal
possession of firearms, ammunitions and explosives laws.
A. RA 8294
B. GO No. 23
C. RA 7438
D. RA 8353
62. It prescribes stiffer penalties in illegal gambling and for other purposes.
A. PD 1866
B. PD 1602
C. PD 1185
D. PD 1508
63. This is otherwise known as the anti-graft and corrupt practices act.
A. RA 3019
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part ThreePage 52
B. RA 3047
C. PD 77
D. BP 195
64. This is an act prescribing, enumerating and defining and penalizing heinous crimes.
A. RA 7659
B. RA 8711
C. RA 9165
D. RA 9269
65. It is otherwise known as the anti-subversion act.
A. RA 1700
B. Act 3815
C. PD 1185
D. RA 7659
66. It is an order in writing commanding a peace officer to search the property
described in the order, and bring before the court.
A. warrant of arrest
B. search warrant
C. judicial notice
D. preliminary attachment
67. It means that the unlawful search taints not only the evidence obtained thereat, but
also the facts discovered by reason of unlawful acts.
A. silver platter doctrine
B. poisonous tree
C. illegal search actions
D. search abusively served
68. These are the instances where a police officer may break the door or windows to
effects a search, EXCEPT:
A. announced his authority and purpose
B. the purpose is search and seizure
C. police officer was refused assistance
D. elements of plain view doctrine
69. These are the things to be search, EXCEPT:
A. property subject of the offense
B. property stolen or fruits of the crime.
C. intended to be used for committing an offense.
D. personal property of the subject person
70. These are the elements of warrant less search, EXCEPT:
A. possession of contraband or illicit articles
B. when there is consent or waiver.
C. when evidence to be seized is in “plain view”
D. search incidental to lawful arrest
71. It is the method provided for by the Revised Rules of Court not only for the
apprehension and prosecution of persons who commit crimes, but also for the
imposition of the penalty.
A. criminal law
B. criminal evidence
C. rules of court
D. criminal procedure
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part ThreePage 53
72. It is a sworn statement charging a person with an offense subscribed by the
offended party, and peace officer, or other public officer charges with the
enforcement of the law violated.
A. information
B. complaint
C. pleadings
D. accusation
73. These are the officers authorized to conduct preliminary investigation, EXECPT:
A. provincial or city fiscal and their assistants
B. judges of the municipal trial courts
C. judges of the regional trial courts
D. national and regional state prosecutors
74. It is the taking of person into custody in order that he may be bound to answer for
the commission of offenses.
A. Arrest
B. Apprehend
C. Detained
D. search
75. A peace officer or a private person, without warrant, may arrest a person lawfully,
except.
A. committing, attempting and committed an offense
B. probable cause of the fact of the offense
C. arrest of escapee from prisons and jails
D. fugitive from justice and the rule of law
76. It is the security given for the release of a person in custody of the law.
A. bailbond
B. property bond
C. bail
D. cash bond
77. Trial in absentia can be conducted in the following manner, EXCEPT:
A. before or after conviction of the lower
B. the accused has been properly arraigned
C. the accused had been duly notified of the
D. failure of the accused to appear is unjustified
78. It is an offense which, under the law existing at the time of its commission and at
the time of the application to be admitted to bail, may be punished by life to death
sentence.
A. heinous crimes
B. capital offense
C. grave offense
D. serious over-acts
79. It is one of the rights granted to a defendant in a criminal case is that he shall be
exempted from being __________.
A. presumed innocent
B. witness against himself
C. self-incriminated
D. confronted by accuser
80. The presence of the accused in court is indispensable and mandatory in the
following instances, EXCEPT:
A. arraignment and plea
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part ThreePage 54
B. promulgation of judgment
C. identification purpose
D. presentation of evidence
81. Arraignment consists of the following, EXCEPT:
A. opportunity for the accused to know the charge
B. reading of complaint or information
C. asking the accused whether guilty or not guilty
D. furnishing of a copy of complaint or information
82. It is any definite statement of any matter with is not averted with sufficient
definiteness or particularly to enable a party to prepare properly his pleading and to
prepare for trial.
A. motion to quash
B. bill of particular
C. petition for review
D. petition for certiorari
83. It is means that when a person is charged with an offense and the case is
terminated either by an acquittal or conviction or any other manner without the
consent of the accused.
A. complaint padding
B. bed sheeting
C. multiple filing of case
D. double jeopardy
84. It is motion to dismiss a criminal case after the prosecution has rested its case on
the ground of insufficiency of evidence.
A. motion to quash
B. re-investigation
C. demurrer to evidence
D. re-pleading
85. It is means the adjudication of the court that the accused is guilty or is not guilty of
the offense charge.
A. judgment
B. prosecution
C. verdict
D. promulgation
86. For the secondary evidence to be admissible, the following requisites must be
proved by satisfactory evidence, EXCEPT:
A. execution and existence or original
B. loss and destruction of the original
C. existed as to the proof of the fact in question
D. unavailability of original is not due bad faith
87. Witnesses are qualified to testify if:
A. they are capable of perceiving
B. they can make perception known to others
C. all of the above
D. none of the above
88. It is any evidence, whether oral or documentary, the probative value of which is not
bases on the personal knowledge of the witness, but on the knowledge of some
other person non on the witness stand.
A. confession
B. acknowledgement
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part ThreePage 55
C. admission
D. hearsay evidence
89. These are the requisites for the admissibility of the declaration against interest.
A. declarant must not be available to testity
B. the actor or declarant is dead and unable to testify
C. the declaration must have related a fact against interest and cognizable by
declarant
D. circumstances must render it improbable that a motive to falsify existed.
90. It is means “things done,” and it includes the circumstances and declarations
incidental to the main facts of the prosecution.
A. dying declaration
B. res gestae
C. pedigree
D. against interest
91. It is the means sanctioned by the Rules of Court of ascertaining in a judicial
proceeding, the truth respecting the matters of fact.
A. Evidence
B. Proof
C. factum probans
D. factum probandum
92. It is the ultimate fact to be established.
A. Evidence
B. Proof
C. factum probans
D. factum probandum
93. It is the establishment of the fact, or the conviction or satisfaction that indeed the
fact exists.
A. Evidence
B. Proof
C. factum probans
D. factum probandum
94. That which has some connection or relation to what is sought to be proved; that
which has a tendency to prove or disprove the matter in dispute.
A. admissible evidence
B. direct evidence
C. relevant evidence
D. material evidence
95. Those are evidences that are addressed to the senses of the court.
A. expert evidence
B. real evidence
C. prim facie evidence
D. primary evidence
96. These are the evidence which was inadmissible under the constitutions, EXCEPT:
A. those who are obtained in violation of the privacy of communications and
correspondence.
B. those obtained thru torture, force violence, threat, intimidation, or any other
means
C. those which are not excluded by the law and which is relevant to the issue.
D. those obtained by compelling a person to be a witness against himself
97. When is evidence admissible in court proceedings?
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part ThreePage 56
A. relevant to the issue
B. when it is competent
C. not excluded by the law
D. all of the above
98. It is consist of statements made by parties in the course of judicial proceedings.
A. judicial notice
B. judicial admissions
C. judicial proceedings
D. judicial process
99. It is that which affords the greatest of the fact in question, and in itself, does not
indicate the existence of other and better proof.
A. best evidence rule
B. secondary evidence
C. parole evidence role
D. testimonial evidence
100. Refers to the legal fitness or ability of a witness to be heard on the trial of the
case.
A. Witness
B. competency of witness
C. testimonial evidence
D. parole evidence rule
1.B 51.D
2.C 52.D
3.D 53.B
4.C 54.A
5.C 55.B
6.B 56.B
7.C 57.D
8.B 58.B
9.C 59.B
10.A 60.B
11. 61.A
D
12.A 62.B
13. 63.A
C
14. 64.A
C
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part ThreePage 57
15.B 65.A
16. 66.B
C
17.B 67.B
18. 68.D
D
19. 69.D
C
20.B 70.A
21. 71.D
D
22.A 72.B
23.B 73.C
24.A 74.A
25.A 75.D
26. 76.C
D
27.B 77.A
28. 78.B
D
29.A 79.B
30.A 80.D
31. 81.A
C
32. 82.B
C
33. 83.D
C
34. 84.A
D
35. 85.A
D
36. 86.C
D
37. 87.C
D
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part ThreePage 58
38.A 88.D
39. 89.B
C
40. 90.B
D
41.B 91.A
42. 92.D
D
43.A 93.B
44.A 94.C
45. 95.B
C
46.A 96.C
47.A 97.D
48.B 98.B
49. 99.A
D
50. 100.B
D
Prudence Research & Review Center: Criminal Jurisprudence Exam Part ThreePage 59
1. What will be the effect on the criminal liability of the accused who was seen when
he committed the crime, but becomes insane at the time of trial?
A. He is exempt from criminal liability under paragraph of Article 12 of the
Revised Penal Code.
B. He is criminally liable but the trial will be suspended until his mental capacity
will be restored to afford a fair trial.
C. His criminal liability will be extinguished
D. Some of the above
2. There is violation of neutrality when the following elements are present, except:
A. There is a war in which the Philippines is involved
B. There is a regulation issued by competent authority for the purpose of
enforcing neutrality
C. The offender violates such regulation
D. none of the above
3. Jezreel and Jeffrey entered Fort Bonifacio and obtained some classified
information. They also took photographs of themselves that has background on
confidential in nature. They can be liable to what crime?
A. Treason
B. Sedition
C. Espionage
D. Sabotage
4. The following are disloyal acts or words in time of war, except:
A. By willfully making reports with intent to interfere with the success of the AFP.
B. To promote the success of its enemies.
C. By willfully attempting to cause subordination, loyalty of the AFP.
D. By willfully obstructing the recruiting or enlisting service.
5. Nick Jacinto fired upon the pilot including one of the crews of the PAL No.0202.
What would be the liability?
A. Liable under R.A 6235
B. Liable under the law prohibiting certain acts inimical to civil aviation.
C. Liable to the crime murder
D. Some of the above
6. Arbitrary detention is to Art. 124, Therefore, Art.128 is ______.
A. Expulsion
B. Delaying release
C. Violation of Domicile
D. Interruption of religious worship
7. The word “eligit” is used in Criminal Jurisprudence. It means _____.
A. a writ of command
B. a writ of execution
C. a writ of judgment
D. a writ of arrest
8. “Enfranchise” means conferring of a right to vote at an election as encumbrance
means _____.
A. unlawfully entering upon another’s rights or possessions.
B. unlawfully entering one’s compound property.
C. unlawfully entering into a contracts or agreement.
D. unlawfully entering into a piece of land owned by the government
9. It simply means, a written or printed accusation of a crime.
A. indenture
1. B 51. C
2. C 52. D
3. C 53. A
4. D 54. B
5. D 55. B
6. C 56. D
7. C 57. A
8. D 58. D
9. B 59. B
10. A 60. B
11. D 61. A
12. B 62. D
13. D 63. A
14. C 64. A
15. B 65. D
16. C 66. A
17. A 67. A
18. B 68. D
19. B 69. C
20. A 70. A
21. B 71. A
22. A 72. B
23. D 73. D
24. C 74. B
25. D 75. B
26. B 76. B
27. A 77. B
28. C 78. D
29. D 79. C
30. A 80. B
31. D 81. A
32. B 82. D
33. D 83. B
34. A 84. C
35. C 85. D
***NOTHING FOLLOWS***
10. The filing of the complaint even with the fiscal’s office
should suspend the running of the Statute of Limitations.
This is
A. True
B. False
C. Partially false
D. None of the above
1. B
2. A
3. D
4. A
5. B
6. D
7. C
8. D
9. C
10. A
11. A
12. A
13. A
14. A
15. A
16. A
17. A
18. C
19. B
20. C
10. "A" stabbed "B". "A" brought "B" to a hospital for medical
treatment.Had it not been the timely medical attendance. "B"
would have died.This is a case of
A. a physical injury
B. an attempted felony
C. a consummated felony
D. a frustrated felony
14. Trial is allowed only after arraignment and the accused may w
his right to appear at the trial except when his presence is
required for purposes of identification. This is the principle of t
in __.
A. Substitution
B. Absentia
C. Re-assignment
D. Ordeal
19. Any private person who shall enter the dwelling of another
against the will of the latter
A. none of these
B. trespassing to dwelling
C. light threats
D. usurpation
20. Are those acts and omissions committed not only by means of
deceit, but also by means of fault and are punishable by law.
A. Justifying circumstances
B. Felonies
C. Exempting circumstances
D. Attempted felony
23. Are those crimes committed against the society which produce
direct damage or prejudice common to all its members.
A. Private crimes
B. Public crimes
C. Felony
D. Infractions
Answers: Criminal Jurisprudence
1. C
2. B
3. A
1. B
2. C
3. A
4. D
1. Combustion or burning in which substances combine chemicall
oxygen from the air and typically give out bright light,heat and
smoke.
A. Flame
B. Heat
C. Fire
D. Smoke
Ans. C
2. A hot glowing body of ignited gas that is generated by somethin
on fire.
A. Flame
B. Heat
C. Fire
D. Smoke
Ans. A
3. An extensive fire that destroys a great deal of land or property.
A. Conflagration
B. Burning
C. Fire
D. Combustion
Ans. A
4. Means on fire or very hot or bright.
A. Flame
B. Burning
C. Fire
D. Combustion
Ans. B
5. The rapid chemical combination of a substance with oxygen
involving the production of heat and light.
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 98
A. Flame
B. Burning
C. Fire
D. Combustion
Ans.D
6. The quality of being hot or high temperature at which fuel will
continue to burn for atleast 5 seconds after ignition by an open
flame.
A. Flame
B. Heat
C. Fire
D. Smoke
Ans. B
7. The natural agent that stimulates sight and makes things visible
A. Flame
B. Heat
C. Light
D. Smoke
Ans. C
8. Is one of the 4 fundamental states of matter, the other being
solid,liquid and gas.
A. Flame
B. Plasma
C. Light
D. Smoke
Ans. B
9. The lowest temperature a which the vapor of a combustible liqu
can be ignited in air.
A. Flash point
B. Ignition temperature
C. Fire point
D. Boiling point
Ans. A
10. Is the temperature at which fuel will continue to burn for at le
five seconds after ignition by an open flame.
A. Flash point
16. The main reason why both traffic officers and signal lights
are used on some intersection is that
A. motorist are discourage from "jumping signals"
B. traffic can be kept moving at a faster rate
C. greater safety to pedestrians and motorist is effected
D. an officer can stop and start as necessity demands
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 102
17. All lines, patterns, words, colors or other gadgets EXCEPT
signs set into the surface or applied upon or attached to the
pavement or curbing officially place for the purpose of regulati
traffic is called _____
A. warning signs
B. traffic management
C. traffic engineering
D. pavement marking
20. A traffic police officer stationed the route of a parade has been
ordered by his superior to allow no cars to cross the route.
While the parade is in progress, an ambulance driver on an
emergency run attempts to drive his ambulance across the
route while the parade is passing. Under these circumstances
the traffic police officer should.
A. ask the driver to wait until the traffic police officer contact
his superior and obtains decisions
B. stop the parade long enough to permit the ambulance t
cross the street
C. hold up the ambulance in accordance with the superior's or
D. direct the ambulance driver to the shortest detour which
will add at least then minutes to run
1. D
2. D
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 103
3. C
4. A
5. D
6. D
7. D
8. A
9. C
10. A
11. A
12. B
13. D
14. D
15. D
16. D
17. D
18. D
19. C
20. B
Baguio City
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 104
corresponding to the letter of your choice on the answer sheet provided.
STRICTLY NO ERASURES ALLOWED. Use pencil no. 1 only.
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 105
A. There is no law or rule making shall be done orally unless allowed
compulsory the presentation of a by the court to be done in writing.
complaint as a witness C. All of the above
B. Confrontation applies only to D. None of the above
witness who actually testify in a 17. X was presented a s a witness by
trail against the accused Atty. X without prior offer of his
C. All of the above testimony. He was allowed by the court
D. None of the above to do so due to oversight. Atty. B, the
12. What are the components of counsel of the other party did not
identification testimony? object but later on contended that the
A. Witnessing a crime, whether as a testimony is inadmissible. Atty. B’s
victim or a bystander involves contention is not correct?
perception of an event actually A. There is a waiver of the requirement
occurring? B. Atty. B. should have objected to the
B. The witness must memorize details of testimony of X for lack of formal
the event offer of the testimony of X.
C. The witness must be able to recall C. All of the above
and communicate accordingly D. None of the above
D. All of the above 18. Circumstantial evidence is
13. What are the ways of out-of court sufficient to convict if:
identification of suspects conducted by A. There is more than circumstance
the police? B. The facts from which the inferences
A. Show-up, where the suspect alone is are prove
brought face with the witness for C. The combination of all the
identification circumstances is such as to produce
B. Mug shots, where photographs are a conviction beyond reasonable doubt
shown to the witness to identify the D. All of the above
suspect 19. Mrs. C was suspecting that her
C. Lie –ups, where a witness identifies husband, a doctor had another woman.
the suspect from a group of persons She raided her husband’s clinic and
lined-up for the purpose of obtained incriminating evidence against
identification him, showing that he had another woman
D. All of the above such as love letters between her
14. The English Exchequer Rule in husband and the other woman. Rule on
Evidence was already abandoned or the admissibility of such evidence.
disregarded because the court’s error A. Not admissible
as to the admission of evidence have B. They are obtained by the wife in
caused prejudice to the accused and violation of the doctor’s right to
therefore requires a new trail. The privacy of communication and
rule was superseded by the: correspondence
A. “Harmless Error Rule” C. All of the above
B. To prevent trial court error and D. None of the above
prevent prejudice to the accused 20. X was charged with the crime of
where judgment is rendered after an falsification of private document.
examination of the entire record State the effect if the original is not
before the court, without regard to presented at the trail.
technical errors, defects which do A. The accused should be acquitted for
not affect the substantial rights of failure of the prosecution to
the parties. produce the original of the document
C. All of the above B. It violates the best evidence rule
D. None of the above C. All of the above
15. A person is not qualified to D. None of the above
testify if? 21. X and Y are very good friends. Y
A. He has previously convicted has been asking X whether he was
B. There exists a relationship between legally married with his wife to which
the victim and the witness X has repeatedly evaded. One day X was
C. On account of the witness’ political stabbed and his friend Y rushed him and
belief or his creed after assisting him, Y reiterated his
D. All of the above question to X whether the woman he was
16. When shall offer of evidence be living was his legal wife. Conscious of
made? his impending death, X admitted that
A. As regards the testimony of a said woman is only his mistress. Is the
witness, the offer must be made at declaration:
the time the witness is called to A. Dying declaration
testify. B. Res gestae
B. Documentary and object evidence C. Not a dying declaration and not part
shall be offered after the of res gestae
presentation of a party’s D. All of the above
testimonial evidence. Such offer
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 106
22. Atty. X was the counsel for the D. All of the above
plaintiff in an action to collect a sum 28. When is judicial notice
of money. In the course of the trial, discretionary? when the facts are:
Atty. X asked his witness to identify A. Of public knowledge
the loan agreement and promissory note B. Capable of unquestionable
executed by the defendant. These demonstration
documents were marked as Exh. “A” and C. Those that judges ought to know by
“B”, respectively. The demand letter reasons of their judicial functions
sent to the defendant to settle his D. All of the above
indebtedness was marked as exhibit “C” 29. The original document are:
after the plaintiff identified said A. The original of a document is one
document. After all the witness had the contents of which are the
completed their respective testimony, subject of inquiry
Atty. X made an offr of the above B. When a document is in two or more
documentary exhibits as follows: copies executed at or about the same
Atty. X: your honor, I am ready to time. With identical contents
offer our documentary evidence. including signatures, all such
copies are equally regarded as
Court: Proceed, Mr. Counsel. originals
C. When an entry is repeated in the
I offer in evidence Exh. “A”,”b” regular course of business, one
and “C”,your honor. Did atty. X being copied from one another at or
commit any error in the manner by near the time of the transaction,
all the entries are likewise equally
which he made an offer of the regarded as originals
documentary evidence? Decide. D. All of the above
30. A private document is considered
A. Atty. X failed to describe the ancient when:
purpose of each of his evidence; A. More than 30 years old
B. He also failed to state the b. B. Is produced from a custody in which
purpose of each of his evidence it would naturally be found if
C. All of the above genuine;
D. None of the above C. Unblemished by any alterations or
23. The burden of proof rests upon circumstances of suspicion;
the party who, as determined by the D. All of the above
pleadings of the nature of the case, 31. It is an instrument, which
asserts affirmative allegations of an consists of the written official acts
issue. This in : or records of the official acts of the
A. Criminal cases sovereign authority, official bodies
B. Civil cases and tribunals, public officers, whether
C. Administrative cases of the Philippines, or of a foreign
D. Special proceedings country; documents acknowledged before
24. The burden of proof as to the notary public.
offense charged lies on the prosecution A. private document
in; B. Public document
A. Administrative cases C. All of the above
B. Civil cases D. None of the above
C. Criminal cases 32. The documents that do not need to
D. Special proceedings be authenticated.
25. The order in the Examination of A. Public documents
an individual witness: B. Notarial documents
A. Direct Examination by the proponent C. Ancient documents
B. Cross Examination by the proponent D. All of the above
C. Re- direct Examination by the 33. As a general rule, the following
proponent are not grounds for disqualification of
D. All of the above testimonial evidence:
26. A question , which suggests to A. Religious belief
the witness the answer, which the B. Political belief
examining party desires, is: C. Interest in the outcome of the case
A. Misleading question D. Conviction of a crime
B. Leading question E. All of the above
C. All of the above 34. Under the rule of the Evidence ,
D. None of the above the grounds for disqualification of
27. The following are examples of testimonial evidence are:
evidence, which are not admissible. A. Mental incapacity
A. Evidence relating to privileged B. Death or insanity of evidence party
communication C. Privileged communication
B. Hearsay evidence D. All of the above
C. Evidence obtained thru invalid
warrants
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 107
35. It is an act, declaration or 42. It is a rule, which requires that
omission as to relevant fact. a witness can testify only to those
A. Confession facts which he knows of his personal
B. Admission knowledge.
C. All of the above A. Hearsay Evidence Rule
D. None of the above B. Best Evidence Rule
36. As a general rule, confession of C. None of the above
a defendant or accused made to witness D. All of the above
are admissible against him but is 43. It is a statement whose probative
admissible against his co-accused/ co- value is independent of its truth or
defendant except: falsity. The mere fact of its utterance
A. Confessions on the witness stand or is relevant.
in court A. Self-serving statement
B. Identical confession, corroborated B. Extra-judicial statement
confessions C. Independently relevant
C. Confession by conspirator after statement
conspiracy has been shown or proven D. All of the above
D. All of the above 44. The exceptions to the Hearsay
37. It is a declaration wherein the Rule are:
testimony is favorable to the A. Declaration against
declarant, it is made extra-judicially, interest
and it is made in anticipation of B. Acts or declaration against
litigation. pedigree
A. Admission C. Commercial lists and the
B. Confession like, learned treaties
C. Self-serving declaration D. All of the above
D. None of the above 45. As a rule, the opinion of a
38. It is the declaration of the witness is not admissible except:
accused acknowledging his guilty of the A. On a matter requiring
offense charged, or any or the offense special knowledge
necessarily included therein. B. Expert witness possessing
A. Admission skill not ordinarily acquired by
B. Confession ordinary witness;
C. Self-serving declaration C. Behavior or conditions or
D. All of the above appearance of a person which he has
39. The requisite of extra-judicial observed;
confession are: D. All of the above
A. Must invoke an express and 46. A general rule, character
categorical acknowledgement of evidence is not admissible except in
guilt; criminal cases such as:
B. The facts admitted must be A. Accused may proved his good moral
constitutive of a criminal offense; character which is pertinent to the
C. Must have been made with the moral character which is pertinent
assistance of competent and to the moral trait involved in the
independent counsel; offense charged
D. All of the above B. Prosecution may only prove accused’s
40. An offer of components by the bad moral character to the moral
accused is admissible in evidence trait involved in the offense
against as an implied admission of charged during rebuttal
guilt except: C. The good or bad moral character of
A. Plea of guilty later withdrawn; the offended party may be if it
B. Unaccepted offer of a plea of guilty tends to establish in any reasonable
to a lesser offense; degree the probability or
C. An offer to pay or payment of improbability of the offense proved.
medical, hosp[ital or other expenses D. All of the above
occasioned by an injury; 47. As a general rule, the party
D. All of the above producing a witness is not allowed to
41. Under the rule, the right of a impeach his own witness except:
party cannot be prejudiced by an act, A. Unwilling or hostile
declaration or omission of another is witness
known as the res inter alios acta rule. B. A witness who is a n
However, such declaration, act or adverse party
omission of another is admissible: C. Officer, Director or Managing agent
A. By a partner/agent or person jointly of a public or private corporation
interested with the party or of a partnership or association
B. By conspirator, by privies which is an adverse party
C. All of the above D. All of the above
D. None of the above 48. An adverse party’s witness may be
impeach:
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 108
A. By contradictory evidence C. During the formal offer of
B. By evidence that his evidence
general reputation for truth, D. All of the above
honesty or integrity is bad 55. The tender of excluded evidence
C. By evidence that he has is made as follows:
made at other times statements A. If the documents or things
inconsistent with this present excluded offered as evidence are
testimony excluded by the court, the offeror
D. All of the above may have the same attached to or
49. A leading question is one which made part of the record
suggests to the witness the answer B. If the evidence excluded is
which the examining party desires. It oral testimony, the offeror may
is not allowed except: state for the record the name and
A. On a cross examination ‘ other personal circumstances of the
B. On a preliminary matters witness and the substance of the
C. When there is difficulty in proposed testimony
getting direct and intelligent C. All of the above
answers who is ignorant, or a child D. None of the above
of tender years, feeble minded, 56. It is the duty of a party to
deaf-mute; of an unwilling or present evidence on the facts in issue
hostile witness necessary to establish his claim or
D. All of the above defense by the amount of evidence
50. It is a question, which assumes required by the law.
as a true a fact not yet testified to A. Burden of proof
by a witness, or contrary to that which B. Weight and sufficiency of
he has previously stated. It is not evidence
allowed: C. Corroborative evidence
A. Leading question D. All of the above
B. Vague question 57. The best evidence rule does not
C. Misleading question apply:
D. All of the above A. When the contents of the
51. The rights of witness are: document are not the subject of
A. To be protected from inquiry
irrelevant, improper, or insulting B. Where the only issue as to
questions, and from harsh or whether or not such document was
insulting demeanor actually executed or not
B. Not to give an answer which C. Whether or not the document
will tend to subject him to a was delivered to the persons
penalty for an offense unless supposed to received it
otherwise provided by law D. All of the above
C. Not to give an answer which 58. The due execution or existence of
will tend to degrade his reputation, a document can be established by:
unless it be to the very fact at A. The person who was present
issue and saw it executed
D. All of the above B. A person who saw the
52. The court shall consider no execution and recognized the
evidence, which has not been formally signature after it was executed
offered. The purpose for which the C. Person to whom the parties
evidence is offered must be specified. to the instrument had previously
This is known as: confessed the execution thereof
A. Offer of evidence D. All of the above
B. Ruling on the evidence 59. The requirements in proving the
C. Offer and objection contents of secondary evidence:
D. None of the above A. The original writing or
53. The formal offer of the document was in fact duly executed
documentary and object and delivered and duly accepted
evidence/exhibits is made: B. That it has been duly lost
A. During the presenting and or destroyed
marking of said evidence C. That upon proof of its
B. During the pre-trial, execution and loss or destruction,
during the trail the contents may be proved by a
C. After the presentation of a copy, or by a recital of its
party’s testimonial evidence contents in some authentic document,
D. All of the above or by recollection of witness
54. The offer of the testimony of a D. All of the above
witness is made at the time when: 60. Carbon copies signed by the
A. The witness is called to parties on the same occasion are
testify considered:
B. After he testified A. Secondary
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 109
B. Original copy Consequently, the offer of X is
C. All of the above admissible as:
D. None of the above A. Extra-judicial confession
61. The other names for object of guilt
evidence: B. Express admission of guilty
A. Real evidence C. Implied admission of guilt
B. Autoptic preference D. All of the above
evidence 67. “A” while driving his car, ran
C. None of the above over B. A visited B at the hospital and
D. All of the above offered to pay for his hospitalization
62. At the trail of “A” for violation expenses. Is the offer by A to pay the
of the Dangerous Drug Act, the hospitalization expenses of B
prosecution offers in evidence a admissible as evidence?
photocopy of the marked P 1,000.00 A. Not admissible in evidence
bills used in the “buy-bust operation”. as proof of the civil or criminal
The photocopy of the marked money is liability of A
what kind of evidence? B. An offer to pay
A. Real evidence hospitalization expenses is not
B. Secondary evidence admissible as proof of civil or
C. Documentary evidence criminal liability
D. All of the above C. All of the above
63. X filed a suit for damages 68. X, Y & Z were charged in court
against Y for derogatory remarks for murder. When put together in jail,
uttered by Y in a radio interview. At they engaged in recrimination, blaming
the trail, the tape recording of the each other for the crime charged. The
radio interview was asked by counsel of jail warden heard said conversation.
X to be played in court. The tape During the trial, the jail warden was
recording is admissible as: presented to testify on the
A. Object evidence recrimination had among X, Y & Z. It is
B. Documentary evidence admissible as:
C. Incomplete evidence A. Independent relevant
D. All of the above statement
64. X was charged with rape with B. Legal Hearsay
homicide. X offered P 1,00,000 as C. All of the above
amicable settlement to the family f the D. None of the above
victim. The family refused. The offer 69. X is charged with frustrated
of compromise made by X is admissible murder of Y. the witness of the
as: prosecution testified that he saw X
A. Direct evidence to prove prepare the poison, which X poured into
his guilt Y’s drink. X sought the
B. Implied admission of his disqualification of B as witness due to
guilt the latter’s final conviction of
C. All of the above perjury. Decide:
D. None of the above A. B is allowed to testify
65. X was charged with homicide. B. Conviction of a crime is
Before the case could be tried, the not a ground for disqualification as
heirs of the victim approached X and a witness
discussed with him the possibility of C. All of the above
settlement of the case and asked how D. None of the above
much X was willing to pay. X offered P 70. A and B are legally married. C
50,000.00 and the heirs accepted the kills A, the husband of B and is now on
offered. The agreement and the offer of trial for homicide. During the trial C
X of P 50,000.oo cannot be admitted as called B (widow) to testify on
an implied admission of X for the statements made by A while under the
reason that: consciousness of death. Is B
A. There was no offer of disqualified to testify as a witness?
compromise made by X Decide.
B. it was made by the heirs of A. B us a competent witness
the victim for the prosecution or defense
C. X offer was only to buy B. As to the dying declaration
peace and should not be construed made to her by her deceased husband
against him C. All of the above
D. All of the above D. None of the above
66. X was accused of having rape C. X 71. In July 1999, D executed a
offered to marry C. the offer X is an promissory note in favor of A in the
offer of compromise and this is not presence of P. D died in 1999, D
allowed even in rape cases, which are executed a promissory note in favor of
not considered private crime. A in the presence of P. D died in 1999
and in 2001, P sues D’s administrator
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 110
in court to collect the amount of the by an eyewitness. Eventually, D was
note because A has assigned the note to charged in court for the death of A.
P. can P and A to the execution of the the prosecution had to rely its case on
note? Decide. circumstantial evidence. At the trial
A. P & A cannot testify the policemen was presented to testify
because this is a matter of fact on the declaration made to him by A. Is
occurring before the death of D the declaration of A admissible as a
B. Not allowed under the dying declaration or part of the res
Deadman’s Statute gestae?
C. All of the above A. Not admitted as a dying
D. None of the above declaration because the cause of
72. A goes to the confessional box death of A was due to gunshot wound
and made a confession to the priest and not stabbing.
that the he killed Z, but B, the B. Not also part of res gestae
sacristan, overhead the confession. Can because D was charged with the death
B testify? Decide. of A and the cause of the death of A
A. The disqualification rule was not the stabbing of D.
applies only between priest and C. All of the above
penitent D. None of the above
B. Not to sacristan who heard 76. Two (2) hours after Y was shot
the confession with a 45-caliber pistol, his employer
C. All of the above in the hospital where he was
D. None of the above immediately brought for treatment after
73. The administrator of the instate he was shot visited him. Immediately,
estate of X files a case for after recognizing his employer, Y told
partition/accounting/damages among his employer that X shot him. The
brothers and sisters. During the trial, employer, being a law graduate of
the administrator objected to the Manila Law College, took the initiative
defendants’ testimony against deceased to taking in longhand the statement of
X. Decide. Y. Y narrated the facts surrounding the
A. The defendants testimony is shooting and positively X as the gun
admissible wielder, witnessed by his employer and
B. The case filed by the his attending physician and nurse, Y
administrator is not the estate or signed the statement taken by his
the administrator employer based on his narration of what
C. The dead man’s statute does actually happened. Ten (10) days later,
not apply in this case Y died as consequence of the gunshot
D. All of the above wound. After the preliminary
74. During custodial investigation at investigation, X was charged for murder
the Police. M was informed of his in court. Decide the nature of the
constitutional right to remain silent declaration of Y.
and to have competent and independent A. Not a dying declaration
counsel. He decided to waive hid right because the statement was given not
to counsel and proceed to make a under a consciousness of impending
statement admitting commission of a death;
case of homicide. In the same B. Not also a part of res
statement, he implicated C, his co- gestae because it was not made
conspirator in the crime. Is the immediately after the startling
statement of M admissible? Decide. occurrence but 2 hours after the
A. the statement of M is not shooting;
admissible C. It is not considered as an
B. The waiver of counsel was independent relevant statement
not made in the presence of counsel because the same is being presented
C. It is not also admitted to established the truth and the
against C even if conspiracy is merely the tenor of the declaration;
proven between M & C as the D. All of the foregoing
statement was made after the 77. In an extra-judicial confession
conspiracy had already ceased executed before the NBI, A charged with
D. All of the foregoing murder, voluntarily admitted the
75. A was stabbed in the chest. He charged. After the conduct of
immediately called for help and preliminary investigation, A, B & c
policemen promptly approached him. He vehemently denied the charged. During
told the policemen that he felt he the trial, counsel of B & C vigorously
would die from the serious wound objected to A’s testimony in court
inflicted on him by D who has a grudge implicating his co-accused. Is the
against him. He was brought to a testimony of Z in court admissible?
hospital for treatment where the same Decide.
day he was shot and killed by someone A. A’s testimony during the
whose identity could not be established trial is admissible
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 111
B. As an exception to hearsay person who had stabbed him. When asked
rule by the police, the victim added that he
C. Considering that the did not know if he was going to
confession is a judicial confession survive, because the many stab wounds
or made in a joint trial; he sustained were very painful. What is
D. All of the above the nature of the declaration of the
78. “W” filed charges of concubinage deceased? Decide
against her husband “H” and his A. Not a dying declaration
paramour “M”. May the court allow or because it was not made under
give weight to the P 200,000.00 diamond consciousness of an impending death;
ring which “H” had offered to “W” as a B. Admitted as part of res
compromise provided “W” desist from gestae
filing the concubinage charge. Decide. C. All of the above
A. The offer of the diamond D. None of the above
ring as a compromise is admissible 82. A found by his wife C dying of
B. It is an implied admission gunshot wounds. Under a consciousness
of “H” guilt; of impending death, A, before he
C. Concubinage is not one of collapses, whispers top his wife C,D
those to be compromised as it does shot me because he discovered that his
not fall as a criminal or quasi wife, E, is my mistress. C goes to the
delict case police and makes a sworn statement, to
D. All of the above include the information whispered to
79. A husband was accused of homicide her by A. A did not die due to timely
because he allegedly killed the medical attendance. D is now charged
illegitimate child of his wife with with frustrated murder. What is the
another man. At the trial, the wife was nature of A’s declaration? Decide
presented as a witness for the A. not dying declaration
prosecution, but the court, upon because the declarant did not die
objection of the husband did not allow B. The declaration is
the wife to testify? Decide. admissible as part of the res gestae
A. The court did not act because the statement was made
correctly spontaneously after a stabbing
B. The wife should be allowed incident;
to testify against her husband as an C. It was made before A had
exception to the marital time to contrive;
disqualification rule; D. All of the above
C. The husband was accused of 83. A group of 3 persons, A, B & C
killing the illegitimate of his wife robbed a house. When they were fleeing
which is considered as a crime after the robbery, they were
committed against his wife’s intercepted by the police and as a
descendant; result A was mortally wounded. Before
D. All of the foregoing he died, but conscious of his impending
80. “X” had a disagreement with “Y” death, A admitted participation in the
and “Z” over a parcel of land. The robbery, and named B and C as his
exchange of words led to a bolo duel companions. Hence, B & C were charged
between “X” and “Y” in whom was killed for the death of the policeman? What is
and “Y” was fatally wounded. Before “Y” the nature of the declaration of A?
in duel. Thereafter a case of homicide Decide.
was filed against “Z” on the theory A. Not a dying declaration
that the he participated in the killing because the subject of inquiry is
of “X”, “Z” offered as a part of his the death of the policeman;
defense the written statement of “Y”. B. The declaration does not
Could it be admitted as a dying refer to A’s death, neither is the
declaration or could it be admitted a s inquiry about A’s death
another exception to the hearsay rule? C. All of the above
Decide. D. None of the above
A. Y’s declaration is not 84. X and Y are very good friends. Y
admissible as a dying declaration has been asking X whether he was asking
because it was not the declaration X he was legally married with his wife
of victim X whose death is the to which X has repeatedly evaded. One
subject of inquiry: day X was stabbed and his friend Y
B. Y is the assailant and not rushed to him and after assisting him,
the victim; but the declaration of Y Y reiterated his question to X whether
is a declaration against interest; the woman he was living was his legal
C. All of the above wife. Conscious of his impending death,
D. None of the above X admitted that said woman is only his
81. Two days before the victim of a mistress. Is the declaration or res
stabbing incident died, he made gestae? Decide.
statement to the police identifying the A. Not a dying declaration
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 112
B. The declaration has nothing 92. It is an extra judicial
to do with the circumstance confession independently made without
surrounding X’s death; collusion, which are identical with
C. All of the above each other in their material respects
D. None of the above and confirmatory of the other.
85. The rule, which states that a A. Interlocking confession
person may not be compelled to testify B. Adopted confession
on the ground of parental or filial C. All of the above
privilege, covers. D. None of the above
A. Parents 93. The following are not admissions
B. Others descendants of liability or guilt and are therefore
C. Children or other direct not admissible in evidence:
descendants A. Plea of guilty later
D. All of the above withdrawn
86. X was approached by Y. X later on B. Unaccepted offer or plea of
shouted “array”. He was brought to the guilty to a lesser offense
hospital where he whispered to Z the C. Offer to pay medical,
name of the person who shot him. He hospital or other expenses due to an
died two (2) hours later. The nature of injury
his declaration is: D. All of the above
A. Dying declaration 94. It is a statement whose probative
B. Res Gestae value is independent of its truth or
C. Declaration against falsity. The mere fact of its utterance
interest is relevant.
D. A & C A. Hearsay statement
87. X was raped by A, B & C. She gave B. Independent relevant
birth to child. Who should be compelled statement
to recognize the child in a multiple C. All of the above
rape? D. None of the above
A. B 95. It is one, which assumes as true,
B. C a fact not yet testifies to by the
C. A witness, or contrary to that which he
D. All of the Above has previously stated. It is not
88. The examination of witness allowed.
presented in trial or hearing shall be A. Leading question
done; B. Misleading question
A. In open court C. Vague question
B. Under oath or affirmation D. All of the above
C. All of the above 96. It is the examination of a
D. None of the above witness by the party presenting him on
89. A court shall take notice without the facts relevant to the issue.
the introduction of evidence and this A. Cross exam
is known as mandatory judicial notice; B. Direct exam
while a court may take judicial notice C. Re-direct exam
of matters, which are of: D. Re-cross exam
A. Public knowledge 97. Upon the termination of the
B. Capable of unquestionable direct exam, the witness may be
demonstration examined by the adverse party to test
C. Ought to be known to judges because his accuracy and truthfulness and
of their judicial functions; freedom from interest and bias, to
D. All of the above elicit all-important facts bearing upon
90. A witness may be considered as the issue.
unwilling or hostile only if so A. Re-direct exam
declared by the court upon adequate B. Cross –exam
showing of: C. Direct exam
A. His adverse interest D. All of the above
B. His having mislead the 98. After the cross exam of the
party calling him to the witness witness, he may be examined by the
stand party calling him, to explain or
C. Unjustified reluctance to supplement his answer given during the
testify cross exam.
D. All of the above A. Re-direct exam
91. The grounds for disqualification B. Recross exam
of testimonial evidence are: C. Direct cross
A. Religious belief D. Cross exam
B. Political belief 99. Upon the conclusion of the re-
C. Interest in the outcome of direct exam, the adverse party may
a case examine the witness on matters stated
D. All of the above in his re-direct.
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 113
A. Re-cross exam
B. Re-direct exam
C. Cross exam
D. Direct exam
100. It means moral certainty or that
degree of proof, which produces
conviction in an unprejudiced mind.
A. Reasonable doubt
B. Moral certainty
C. Corpus delicti
D. All of the above
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 114
MR. KEY ANSWER for CJURIS (part 5)
1 2 5 76
. 6 1 .D
C . .
B D
2 2 5 77
. 7 2 .D
D . .
D A
3 2 5 78
. 8 3 .D
D . .
D C
4 2 5 79
. 9 4 .D
C . .
D A
5 3 5 80
. 0 5 .C
C . .
D C
6 3 5 81
. 1 6 .C
D . .
B A
7 3 5 82
. 2 7 .D
B . .
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 115
D D
8 3 5 83
. 3 8 .C
A . .
D D
9 3 5 84
. 4 9 .C
C . .
D D
1 3 6 85
0 5 0 .D
. . .
D B B
1 3 6 86
1 6 1 .B
. . .
C D D
1 3 6 87
2 7 2 .C
. . .
D C A
1 3 6 88
3 8 3 .C
. . .
D B A
1 3 6 89
4 9 4 .D
. . .
C D B
1 4 6 90
5 0 5 .D
. . .
D D D
1 4 6 91
6 1 6 .D
. . .
C C C
1 4 6 92
7 2 7 .A
. . .
C A C
1 4 6 93
8 3 8 .D
. . .
D C C
1 4 6 94
9 4 9 .B
. . .
D D D
2 4 7 95
0 5 0 .B
. . .
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 116
C D C
2 4 7 96
1 6 1 .B
. . .
C D C
2 4 7 97
2 7 2 .B
. . .
C D C
2 4 7 98
3 8 3 .A
. . .
B D D
2 4 7 99
4 9 4 .A
. . .
C D D
2 5 7 10
5 0 5 0.
. . . A
D C C
Baguio City
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 117
CRIMINAL JURISPRUDENCE & PROCEDURE (CJURIS)-Part Five
101. The testimony of an expert is rape case before the presence of the TV
admissible if: crew and reporters is admissible:
A. The subject under E. It was an admission not under
examination requires knowledge or custodial investigation
experience F. It was voluntarily given
B. The witness is an expert G. All of the above
who possesses special knowledge, H. None of the above
skill, training or experience on the 106. The constitutional right to self-
particular subject under incrimination of a person does not
C. All of the above apply to :
D. None of the above E. Measuring or photographing of the
102. Evidence of character of the person
deceased is admissible in homicide F. Removal or replacement of his
cases where his bad character produces garments or shoes
in the mind of the accused a reasonable G. Requiring that the party moves his
belief of imminent danger to his life body to enable the foregoing thing
and that prompt action to defend to be done
himself against unlawful aggression is H. All of the above
necessary. However, character evidence 107. Y was beaten X to death, but
does not apply to: before he died, he was brought by his
E. Murder when the killing was grandmother to the hospital, limp and
aggravated by treachery or evident bloodied. The grandmother had a
premeditation hysterical outburst at the emergency
F. Those charged with negligence since room that Y was the one who beat X.
evidence of good reputation as a During the trial, the grandmother was
skillful, careful driver is not already dead. The outburst is admitted
admissible as an evidence of:
G. In rape cases where the sexual E. Dying declaration
intercourse complained of took place F. Part of res gastae
with force, intimidation or violence G. The combination of A & B
H. All of the above H. All of the above
103. Paraffin test can establish only: 108. The medical certificate of a
E. The presence or absence of nitrates doctor who was not presented as a
on the hand witness is not admissible and has no
F. It cannot establish that from this probative value because:
test alone the source of nitrates E. Hearsay
was the discharge of a firearm F. The doctor must presented during the
G. The absence of nitrates on the hand trial
of a suspect does not preclude a G. All of the above
judgment where the overwhelming H. None of the above
evidence proves his guilt. 109. X was charged with the crime of
H. All of the above illegal possession of firearms without
104. X confided to Director Z that she license. The prosecution to sustain the
committed adultery. The statement is conviction of the accused must prove:
admissible as evidence because: E. The negative allegation of lack of
E. It was given not during a custodial license to posses firearm
investigation F. The obligation exists even if the
F. It does not violate the firearm is paltik
constitutional right to remain G. All of the above
silent or to counsel H. None of the above
G. All of the above 110. The judge in the trail actively
H. None of the above participated in the direct and cross-
105. X, an accused in a rape case, examination. This is allowed because
admitted his guilt while being the judged wanted to:
interviewed on T.V and radio. His E. To find out the truth and do justice
admission of his participation in a to the parties
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 118
F. T does not amount to a denial of the F. There exists a relationship between
accused to a fair and impartial the victim and the witness
trial G. On account of the witness’ political
G. The accused is not denied of due belief or his creed
process H. All of the above
H. All of the above 116. When shall offer of evidence be
111. X was charged with illegal made?
recruitment of eight (8) people. At the E. As regards the testimony of a
trail, only 5 were presented. X was witness, the offer must be made at
convicted. X questioned his conviction the time the witness is called to
contending that the trial court testify.
violated his right to confront the F. Documentary and object evidence
witness against him. X contention is shall be offered after the
not correct. presentation of a party’s
E. There is no law or rule making testimonial evidence. Such offer
compulsory the presentation of a shall be done orally unless allowed
complaint as a witness by the court to be done in writing.
F. Confrontation applies only to G. All of the above
witness who actually testify in a H. None of the above
trail against the accused 117. X was presented a s a witness by
G. All of the above Atty. X without prior offer of his
H. None of the above testimony. He was allowed by the court
112. What are the components of to do so due to oversight. Atty. B, the
identification testimony? counsel of the other party did not
E. Witnessing a crime, whether as a object but later on contended that the
victim or a bystander involves testimony is inadmissible. Atty. B’s
perception of an event actually contention is not correct?
occurring? E. There is a waiver of the requirement
F. The witness must memorize details of F. Atty. B. should have objected to the
the event testimony of X for lack of formal
G. The witness must be able to recall offer of the testimony of X.
and communicate accordingly G. All of the above
H. All of the above H. None of the above
113. What are the ways of out-of court 118. Circumstantial evidence is
identification of suspects conducted by sufficient to convict if:
the police? E. There is more than circumstance
E. Show-up, where the suspect alone is F. The facts from which the inferences
brought face with the witness for are prove
identification G. The combination of all the
F. Mug shots, where photographs are circumstances is such as to produce
shown to the witness to identify the a conviction beyond reasonable doubt
suspect H. All of the above
G. Lie –ups, where a witness identifies 119. Mrs. C was suspecting that her
the suspect from a group of persons husband, a doctor had another woman.
lined-up for the purpose of She raided her husband’s clinic and
identification obtained incriminating evidence against
H. All of the above him, showing that he had another woman
114. The English Exchequer Rule in such as love letters between her
Evidence was already abandoned or husband and the other woman. Rule on
disregarded because the court’s error the admissibility of such evidence.
as to the admission of evidence have E. Not admissible
caused prejudice to the accused and F. They are obtained by the wife in
therefore requires a new trail. The violation of the doctor’s right to
rule was superseded by the: privacy of communication and
E. “Harmless Error Rule” correspondence
F. To prevent trial court error and G. All of the above
prevent prejudice to the accused H. None of the above
where judgment is rendered after an 120. X was charged with the crime of
examination of the entire record falsification of private document.
before the court, without regard to State the effect if the original is not
technical errors, defects which do presented at the trail.
not affect the substantial rights of E. The accused should be acquitted for
the parties. failure of the prosecution to
G. All of the above produce the original of the document
H. None of the above F. It violates the best evidence rule
115. A person is not qualified to G. All of the above
testify if? H. None of the above
E. He has previously convicted 121. X and Y are very good friends. Y
has been asking X whether he was
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 119
legally married with his wife to which 126. A question , which suggests to
X has repeatedly evaded. One day X was the witness the answer, which the
stabbed and his friend Y rushed him and examining party desires, is:
after assisting him, Y reiterated his E. Misleading question
question to X whether the woman he was F. Leading question
living was his legal wife. Conscious of G. All of the above
his impending death, X admitted that H. None of the above
said woman is only his mistress. Is the 127. The following are examples of
declaration: evidence, which are not admissible.
E. Dying declaration E. Evidence relating to privileged
F. Res gestae communication
G. Not a dying declaration and not part F. Hearsay evidence
of res gestae G. Evidence obtained thru invalid
H. All of the above warrants
122. Atty. X was the counsel for the H. All of the above
plaintiff in an action to collect a sum 128. When is judicial notice
of money. In the course of the trial, discretionary? when the facts are:
Atty. X asked his witness to identify E. Of public knowledge
the loan agreement and promissory note F. Capable of unquestionable
executed by the defendant. These demonstration
documents were marked as Exh. “A” and G. Those that judges ought to know by
“B”, respectively. The demand letter reasons of their judicial functions
sent to the defendant to settle his H. All of the above
indebtedness was marked as exhibit “C” 129. The original document are:
after the plaintiff identified said E. The original of a document is one
document. After all the witness had the contents of which are the
completed their respective testimony, subject of inquiry
Atty. X made an offr of the above F. When a document is in two or more
documentary exhibits as follows: copies executed at or about the same
Atty. X: your honor, I am ready to time. With identical contents
offer our documentary evidence. including signatures, all such
copies are equally regarded as
Court: Proceed, Mr. Counsel. originals
G. When an entry is repeated in the
I offer in evidence Exh. “A”,”b” regular course of business, one
and “C”,your honor. Did atty. X being copied from one another at or
commit any error in the manner by near the time of the transaction,
all the entries are likewise equally
which he made an offer of the regarded as originals
documentary evidence? Decide. H. All of the above
130. A private document is considered
E. Atty. X failed to describe the ancient when:
purpose of each of his evidence; E. More than 30 years old
F. He also failed to state the b. F. Is produced from a custody in which
purpose of each of his evidence it would naturally be found if
G. All of the above genuine;
H. None of the above G. Unblemished by any alterations or
123. The burden of proof rests upon circumstances of suspicion;
the party who, as determined by the H. All of the above
pleadings of the nature of the case, 131. It is an instrument, which
asserts affirmative allegations of an consists of the written official acts
issue. This in : or records of the official acts of the
E. Criminal cases sovereign authority, official bodies
F. Civil cases and tribunals, public officers, whether
G. Administrative cases of the Philippines, or of a foreign
H. Special proceedings country; documents acknowledged before
124. The burden of proof as to the notary public.
offense charged lies on the prosecution E. private document
in; F. Public document
E. Administrative cases G. All of the above
F. Civil cases H. None of the above
G. Criminal cases 132. The documents that do not need to
H. Special proceedings be authenticated.
125. The order in the Examination of E. Public documents
an individual witness: F. Notarial documents
E. Direct Examination by the proponent G. Ancient documents
F. Cross Examination by the proponent H. All of the above
G. Re- direct Examination by the
proponent
H. All of the above
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 120
133. As a general rule, the following G. An offer to pay or payment of
are not grounds for disqualification of medical, hosp[ital or other expenses
testimonial evidence: occasioned by an injury;
F. Religious belief H. All of the above
G. Political belief 141. Under the rule, the right of a
H. Interest in the outcome of the case party cannot be prejudiced by an act,
I. Conviction of a crime declaration or omission of another is
J. All of the above known as the res inter alios acta rule.
134. Under the rule of the Evidence , However, such declaration, act or
the grounds for disqualification of omission of another is admissible:
testimonial evidence are: E. By a partner/agent or person jointly
E. Mental incapacity interested with the party
F. Death or insanity of evidence party F. By conspirator, by privies
G. Privileged communication G. All of the above
H. All of the above H. None of the above
135. It is an act, declaration or 142. It is a rule, which requires that
omission as to relevant fact. a witness can testify only to those
E. Confession facts which he knows of his personal
F. Admission knowledge.
G. All of the above E. Hearsay Evidence Rule
H. None of the above F. Best Evidence Rule
136. As a general rule, confession of G. None of the above
a defendant or accused made to witness H. All of the above
are admissible against him but is 143. It is a statement whose probative
admissible against his co-accused/ co- value is independent of its truth or
defendant except: falsity. The mere fact of its utterance
E. Confessions on the witness stand or is relevant.
in court A. Self-serving statement
F. Identical confession, corroborated B. Extra-judicial statement
confessions C. Independently relevant
G. Confession by conspirator after statement
conspiracy has been shown or proven D. All of the above
H. All of the above 144. The exceptions to the Hearsay
137. It is a declaration wherein the Rule are:
testimony is favorable to the A. Declaration against
declarant, it is made extra-judicially, interest
and it is made in anticipation of B. Acts or declaration against
litigation. pedigree
E. Admission C. Commercial lists and the
F. Confession like, learned treaties
G. Self-serving declaration D. All of the above
H. None of the above 145. As a rule, the opinion of a
138. It is the declaration of the witness is not admissible except:
accused acknowledging his guilty of the A. On a matter requiring
offense charged, or any or the offense special knowledge
necessarily included therein. B. Expert witness possessing
E. Admission skill not ordinarily acquired by
F. Confession ordinary witness;
G. Self-serving declaration C. Behavior or conditions or
H. All of the above appearance of a person which he has
139. The requisite of extra-judicial observed;
confession are: D. All of the above
E. Must invoke an express and 146. A general rule, character
categorical acknowledgement of evidence is not admissible except in
guilt; criminal cases such as:
F. The facts admitted must be A. Accused may proved his good moral
constitutive of a criminal offense; character which is pertinent to the
G. Must have been made with the moral character which is pertinent
assistance of competent and to the moral trait involved in the
independent counsel; offense charged
H. All of the above B. Prosecution may only prove accused’s
140. An offer of components by the bad moral character to the moral
accused is admissible in evidence trait involved in the offense
against as an implied admission of charged during rebuttal
guilt except: C. The good or bad moral character of
E. Plea of guilty later withdrawn; the offended party may be if it
F. Unaccepted offer of a plea of guilty tends to establish in any reasonable
to a lesser offense; degree the probability or
improbability of the offense proved.
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 121
D. All of the above 153. The formal offer of the
147. As a general rule, the party documentary and object
producing a witness is not allowed to evidence/exhibits is made:
impeach his own witness except: A. During the presenting and
A. Unwilling or hostile marking of said evidence
witness B. During the pre-trial,
B. A witness who is a n during the trail
adverse party C. After the presentation of a
C. Officer, Director or Managing agent party’s testimonial evidence
of a public or private corporation D. All of the above
or of a partnership or association 154. The offer of the testimony of a
which is an adverse party witness is made at the time when:
D. All of the above A. The witness is called to
148. An adverse party’s witness may be testify
impeach: B. After he testified
A. By contradictory evidence C. During the formal offer of
B. By evidence that his evidence
general reputation for truth, D. All of the above
honesty or integrity is bad 155. The tender of excluded evidence
C. By evidence that he has is made as follows:
made at other times statements A. If the documents or things
inconsistent with this present excluded offered as evidence are
testimony excluded by the court, the offeror
D. All of the above may have the same attached to or
149. A leading question is one which made part of the record
suggests to the witness the answer B. If the evidence excluded is
which the examining party desires. It oral testimony, the offeror may
is not allowed except: state for the record the name and
A. On a cross examination ‘ other personal circumstances of the
B. On a preliminary matters witness and the substance of the
C. When there is difficulty in proposed testimony
getting direct and intelligent C. All of the above
answers who is ignorant, or a child D. None of the above
of tender years, feeble minded, 156. It is the duty of a party to
deaf-mute; of an unwilling or present evidence on the facts in issue
hostile witness necessary to establish his claim or
D. All of the above defense by the amount of evidence
150. It is a question, which assumes required by the law.
as a true a fact not yet testified to A. Burden of proof
by a witness, or contrary to that which B. Weight and sufficiency of
he has previously stated. It is not evidence
allowed: C. Corroborative evidence
A. Leading question D. All of the above
B. Vague question 157. The best evidence rule does not
C. Misleading question apply:
D. All of the above A. When the contents of the
151. The rights of witness are: document are not the subject of
A. To be protected from inquiry
irrelevant, improper, or insulting B. Where the only issue as to
questions, and from harsh or whether or not such document was
insulting demeanor actually executed or not
B. Not to give an answer which C. Whether or not the document
will tend to subject him to a was delivered to the persons
penalty for an offense unless supposed to received it
otherwise provided by law D. All of the above
C. Not to give an answer which 158. The due execution or existence of
will tend to degrade his reputation, a document can be established by:
unless it be to the very fact at A. The person who was present
issue and saw it executed
D. All of the above B. A person who saw the
152. The court shall consider no execution and recognized the
evidence, which has not been formally signature after it was executed
offered. The purpose for which the C. Person to whom the parties
evidence is offered must be specified. to the instrument had previously
This is known as: confessed the execution thereof
A. Offer of evidence D. All of the above
B. Ruling on the evidence 159. The requirements in proving the
C. Offer and objection contents of secondary evidence:
D. None of the above
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 122
A. The original writing or an implied admission of X for the
document was in fact duly executed reason that:
and delivered and duly accepted A. There was no offer of
B. That it has been duly lost compromise made by X
or destroyed B. it was made by the heirs of
C. That upon proof of its the victim
execution and loss or destruction, C. X offer was only to buy
the contents may be proved by a peace and should not be construed
copy, or by a recital of its against him
contents in some authentic document, D. All of the above
or by recollection of witness 166. X was accused of having rape C. X
D. All of the above offered to marry C. the offer X is an
160. Carbon copies signed by the offer of compromise and this is not
parties on the same occasion are allowed even in rape cases, which are
considered: not considered private crime.
A. Secondary Consequently, the offer of X is
B. Original copy admissible as:
C. All of the above A. Extra-judicial confession
D. None of the above of guilt
161. The other names for object B. Express admission of guilty
evidence: C. Implied admission of guilt
A. Real evidence D. All of the above
B. Autoptic preference 167. “A” while driving his car, ran
evidence over B. A visited B at the hospital and
C. None of the above offered to pay for his hospitalization
D. All of the above expenses. Is the offer by A to pay the
162. At the trail of “A” for violation hospitalization expenses of B
of the Dangerous Drug Act, the admissible as evidence?
prosecution offers in evidence a A. Not admissible in evidence
photocopy of the marked P 1,000.00 as proof of the civil or criminal
bills used in the “buy-bust operation”. liability of A
The photocopy of the marked money is B. An offer to pay
what kind of evidence? hospitalization expenses is not
A. Real evidence admissible as proof of civil or
B. Secondary evidence criminal liability
C. Documentary evidence C. All of the above
D. All of the above 168. X, Y & Z were charged in court
163. X filed a suit for damages for murder. When put together in jail,
against Y for derogatory remarks they engaged in recrimination, blaming
uttered by Y in a radio interview. At each other for the crime charged. The
the trail, the tape recording of the jail warden heard said conversation.
radio interview was asked by counsel of During the trial, the jail warden was
X to be played in court. The tape presented to testify on the
recording is admissible as: recrimination had among X, Y & Z. It is
A. Object evidence admissible as:
B. Documentary evidence A. Independent relevant
C. Incomplete evidence statement
D. All of the above B. Legal Hearsay
164. X was charged with rape with C. All of the above
homicide. X offered P 1,00,000 as D. None of the above
amicable settlement to the family f the 169. X is charged with frustrated
victim. The family refused. The offer murder of Y. the witness of the
of compromise made by X is admissible prosecution testified that he saw X
as: prepare the poison, which X poured into
A. Direct evidence to prove Y’s drink. X sought the
his guilt disqualification of B as witness due to
B. Implied admission of his the latter’s final conviction of
guilt perjury. Decide:
C. All of the above A. B is allowed to testify
D. None of the above B. Conviction of a crime is
165. X was charged with homicide. not a ground for disqualification as
Before the case could be tried, the a witness
heirs of the victim approached X and C. All of the above
discussed with him the possibility of D. None of the above
settlement of the case and asked how 170. A and B are legally married. C
much X was willing to pay. X offered P kills A, the husband of B and is now on
50,000.00 and the heirs accepted the trial for homicide. During the trial C
offered. The agreement and the offer of called B (widow) to testify on
X of P 50,000.oo cannot be admitted as statements made by A while under the
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 123
consciousness of death. Is B C. It is not also admitted
disqualified to testify as a witness? against C even if conspiracy is
Decide. proven between M & C as the
A. B us a competent witness statement was made after the
for the prosecution or defense conspiracy had already ceased
B. As to the dying declaration D. All of the foregoing
made to her by her deceased husband 175. A was stabbed in the chest. He
C. All of the above immediately called for help and
D. None of the above policemen promptly approached him. He
171. In July 1999, D executed a told the policemen that he felt he
promissory note in favor of A in the would die from the serious wound
presence of P. D died in 1999, D inflicted on him by D who has a grudge
executed a promissory note in favor of against him. He was brought to a
A in the presence of P. D died in 1999 hospital for treatment where the same
and in 2001, P sues D’s administrator day he was shot and killed by someone
in court to collect the amount of the whose identity could not be established
note because A has assigned the note to by an eyewitness. Eventually, D was
P. can P and A to the execution of the charged in court for the death of A.
note? Decide. the prosecution had to rely its case on
A. P & A cannot testify circumstantial evidence. At the trial
because this is a matter of fact the policemen was presented to testify
occurring before the death of D on the declaration made to him by A. Is
B. Not allowed under the the declaration of A admissible as a
Deadman’s Statute dying declaration or part of the res
C. All of the above gestae?
D. None of the above A. Not admitted as a dying
172. A goes to the confessional box declaration because the cause of
and made a confession to the priest death of A was due to gunshot wound
that the he killed Z, but B, the and not stabbing.
sacristan, overhead the confession. Can B. Not also part of res gestae
B testify? Decide. because D was charged with the death
A. The disqualification rule of A and the cause of the death of A
applies only between priest and was not the stabbing of D.
penitent C. All of the above
B. Not to sacristan who heard D. None of the above
the confession 176. Two (2) hours after Y was shot
C. All of the above with a 45-caliber pistol, his employer
D. None of the above in the hospital where he was
173. The administrator of the instate immediately brought for treatment after
estate of X files a case for he was shot visited him. Immediately,
partition/accounting/damages among after recognizing his employer, Y told
brothers and sisters. During the trial, his employer that X shot him. The
the administrator objected to the employer, being a law graduate of
defendants’ testimony against deceased Manila Law College, took the initiative
X. Decide. to taking in longhand the statement of
A. The defendants testimony is Y. Y narrated the facts surrounding the
admissible shooting and positively X as the gun
B. The case filed by the wielder, witnessed by his employer and
administrator is not the estate or his attending physician and nurse, Y
the administrator signed the statement taken by his
C. The dead man’s statute does employer based on his narration of what
not apply in this case actually happened. Ten (10) days later,
D. All of the above Y died as consequence of the gunshot
174. During custodial investigation at wound. After the preliminary
the Police. M was informed of his investigation, X was charged for murder
constitutional right to remain silent in court. Decide the nature of the
and to have competent and independent declaration of Y.
counsel. He decided to waive hid right A. Not a dying declaration
to counsel and proceed to make a because the statement was given not
statement admitting commission of a under a consciousness of impending
case of homicide. In the same death;
statement, he implicated C, his co- B. Not also a part of res
conspirator in the crime. Is the gestae because it was not made
statement of M admissible? Decide. immediately after the startling
A. the statement of M is not occurrence but 2 hours after the
admissible shooting;
B. The waiver of counsel was C. It is not considered as an
not made in the presence of counsel independent relevant statement
because the same is being presented
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 124
to established the truth and the declaration or could it be admitted a s
merely the tenor of the declaration; another exception to the hearsay rule?
D. All of the foregoing Decide.
177. In an extra-judicial confession A. Y’s declaration is not
executed before the NBI, A charged with admissible as a dying declaration
murder, voluntarily admitted the because it was not the declaration
charged. After the conduct of of victim X whose death is the
preliminary investigation, A, B & c subject of inquiry:
vehemently denied the charged. During B. Y is the assailant and not
the trial, counsel of B & C vigorously the victim; but the declaration of Y
objected to A’s testimony in court is a declaration against interest;
implicating his co-accused. Is the C. All of the above
testimony of Z in court admissible? D. None of the above
Decide. 181. Two days before the victim of a
A. A’s testimony during the stabbing incident died, he made
trial is admissible statement to the police identifying the
B. As an exception to hearsay person who had stabbed him. When asked
rule by the police, the victim added that he
C. Considering that the did not know if he was going to
confession is a judicial confession survive, because the many stab wounds
or made in a joint trial; he sustained were very painful. What is
D. All of the above the nature of the declaration of the
178. “W” filed charges of concubinage deceased? Decide
against her husband “H” and his A. Not a dying declaration
paramour “M”. May the court allow or because it was not made under
give weight to the P 200,000.00 diamond consciousness of an impending death;
ring which “H” had offered to “W” as a B. Admitted as part of res
compromise provided “W” desist from gestae
filing the concubinage charge. Decide. C. All of the above
A. The offer of the diamond D. None of the above
ring as a compromise is admissible 182. A found by his wife C dying of
B. It is an implied admission gunshot wounds. Under a consciousness
of “H” guilt; of impending death, A, before he
C. Concubinage is not one of collapses, whispers top his wife C,D
those to be compromised as it does shot me because he discovered that his
not fall as a criminal or quasi wife, E, is my mistress. C goes to the
delict case police and makes a sworn statement, to
D. All of the above include the information whispered to
179. A husband was accused of homicide her by A. A did not die due to timely
because he allegedly killed the medical attendance. D is now charged
illegitimate child of his wife with with frustrated murder. What is the
another man. At the trial, the wife was nature of A’s declaration? Decide
presented as a witness for the A. not dying declaration
prosecution, but the court, upon because the declarant did not die
objection of the husband did not allow B. The declaration is
the wife to testify? Decide. admissible as part of the res gestae
A. The court did not act because the statement was made
correctly spontaneously after a stabbing
B. The wife should be allowed incident;
to testify against her husband as an C. It was made before A had
exception to the marital time to contrive;
disqualification rule; D. All of the above
C. The husband was accused of 183. A group of 3 persons, A, B & C
killing the illegitimate of his wife robbed a house. When they were fleeing
which is considered as a crime after the robbery, they were
committed against his wife’s intercepted by the police and as a
descendant; result A was mortally wounded. Before
D. All of the foregoing he died, but conscious of his impending
180. “X” had a disagreement with “Y” death, A admitted participation in the
and “Z” over a parcel of land. The robbery, and named B and C as his
exchange of words led to a bolo duel companions. Hence, B & C were charged
between “X” and “Y” in whom was killed for the death of the policeman? What is
and “Y” was fatally wounded. Before “Y” the nature of the declaration of A?
in duel. Thereafter a case of homicide Decide.
was filed against “Z” on the theory A. Not a dying declaration
that the he participated in the killing because the subject of inquiry is
of “X”, “Z” offered as a part of his the death of the policeman;
defense the written statement of “Y”.
Could it be admitted as a dying
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 125
B. The declaration does not 190. A witness may be considered as
refer to A’s death, neither is the unwilling or hostile only if so
inquiry about A’s death declared by the court upon adequate
C. All of the above showing of:
D. None of the above A. His adverse interest
184. X and Y are very good friends. Y B. His having mislead the
has been asking X whether he was asking party calling him to the witness
X he was legally married with his wife stand
to which X has repeatedly evaded. One C. Unjustified reluctance to
day X was stabbed and his friend Y testify
rushed to him and after assisting him, D. All of the above
Y reiterated his question to X whether 191. The grounds for disqualification
the woman he was living was his legal of testimonial evidence are:
wife. Conscious of his impending death, A. Religious belief
X admitted that said woman is only his B. Political belief
mistress. Is the declaration or res C. Interest in the outcome of
gestae? Decide. a case
A. Not a dying declaration D. All of the above
B. The declaration has nothing 192. It is an extra judicial
to do with the circumstance confession independently made without
surrounding X’s death; collusion, which are identical with
C. All of the above each other in their material respects
D. None of the above and confirmatory of the other.
185. The rule, which states that a A. Interlocking confession
person may not be compelled to testify B. Adopted confession
on the ground of parental or filial C. All of the above
privilege, covers. D. None of the above
A. Parents 193. The following are not admissions
B. Others descendants of liability or guilt and are therefore
C. Children or other direct not admissible in evidence:
descendants A. Plea of guilty later
D. All of the above withdrawn
186. X was approached by Y. X later on B. Unaccepted offer or plea of
shouted “array”. He was brought to the guilty to a lesser offense
hospital where he whispered to Z the C. Offer to pay medical,
name of the person who shot him. He hospital or other expenses due to an
died two (2) hours later. The nature of injury
his declaration is: D. All of the above
A. Dying declaration 194. It is a statement whose probative
B. Res Gestae value is independent of its truth or
C. Declaration against falsity. The mere fact of its utterance
interest is relevant.
D. A & C A. Hearsay statement
187. X was raped by A, B & C. She gave B. Independent relevant
birth to child. Who should be compelled statement
to recognize the child in a multiple C. All of the above
rape? D. None of the above
A. B 195. It is one, which assumes as true,
B. C a fact not yet testifies to by the
C. A witness, or contrary to that which he
D. All of the Above has previously stated. It is not
188. The examination of witness allowed.
presented in trial or hearing shall be A. Leading question
done; B. Misleading question
A. In open court C. Vague question
B. Under oath or affirmation D. All of the above
C. All of the above 196. It is the examination of a
D. None of the above witness by the party presenting him on
189. A court shall take notice without the facts relevant to the issue.
the introduction of evidence and this A. Cross exam
is known as mandatory judicial notice; B. Direct exam
while a court may take judicial notice C. Re-direct exam
of matters, which are of: D. Re-cross exam
A. Public knowledge 197. Upon the termination of the
B. Capable of unquestionable direct exam, the witness may be
demonstration examined by the adverse party to test
C. Ought to be known to judges because his accuracy and truthfulness and
of their judicial functions; freedom from interest and bias, to
D. All of the above
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 126
elicit all-important facts bearing upon
the issue.
A. Re-direct exam
B. Cross –exam
C. Direct exam
D. All of the above
198. After the cross exam of the
witness, he may be examined by the
party calling him, to explain or
supplement his answer given during the
cross exam.
A. Re-direct exam
B. Recross exam
C. Direct cross
D. Cross exam
199. Upon the conclusion of the re-
direct exam, the adverse party may
examine the witness on matters stated
in his re-direct.
A. Re-cross exam
B. Re-direct exam
C. Cross exam
D. Direct exam
200. It means moral certainty or that
degree of proof, which produces
conviction in an unprejudiced mind.
A. Reasonable doubt
B. Moral certainty
C. Corpus delicti
D. All of the above
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 127
MR. KEY ANSWER for CJURIS (part 5)
1. 26 51 76
C .B .D .D
2. 27 52 77
D .D .A .D
3. 28 53 78
D .D .C .D
4. 29 54 79
C .D .A .D
5. 30 55 80
C .D .C .C
6. 31 56 81
D .B .A .C
7. 32 57 82
B .D .D .D
8. 33 58 83
A .D .D .C
9. 34 59 84
C .D .D .C
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 128
10 35 60 85
.D .B .B .D
11 36 61 86
.C .D .D .B
12 37 62 87
.D .C .A .C
13 38 63 88
.D .B .A .C
14 39 64 89
.C .D .B .D
15 40 65 90
.D .D .D .D
16 41 66 91
.C .C .C .D
17 42 67 92
.C .A .C .A
18 43 68 93
.D .C .C .D
19 44 69 94
.D .D .D .B
20 45 70 95
.C .D .C .B
21 46 71 96
.C .D .C .B
22 47 72 97
.C .D .C .B
23 48 73 98
.B .D .D .A
24 49 74 99
.C .D .D .A
25 50 75 10
.D .C .C 0.
A
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 129
1. Under Section 6 of the Rule 120 of the Rules
of Court, a judgment of acquittal is validly
promulgated after the Clerk of Court has
entered it in the criminal docket and the
defendant served with a copy thereof. The
presence of the defendant is not necessary
where the judgment is one of:
a. Conviction of grave offense c. Conviction of a light
offense
b. Acquittal d. All of them
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 131
8. Appeal by “either party” as used in the law
has been interpreted to mean...
a. Only the government and the accused
b. Other persons who may be affected by the judgment
rendered in the criminal proceedings
c. B only
d. All of the above
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 132
d. None of the above
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 133
a. The second offense did not yet exist at the time of the
first prosecution for frustrated homicide
b. Possibility for him to be convicted for non-existing
crime, which supervened after
being charged for frustrated homicide;
c. B only
d. All of the above
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 134
16. The court shall consider no evidence, which
has not been formally offered. The purpose for
which the evidence is offered must be specified.
When shall offer of evidence be made? As
regards the testimony of witness, the offer must
be made at the time__,
a. the witness is called to testify;
b. after the presentation of a party’s testimonial evidence;
c. fill out the blanks with the correct answer
d. all of the above
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 135
c. The Clerk of Court shall make certified
true copies of the judgment to be serve
d. all of the above
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 136
a. The judge must examine the complainant and his
witnesses personally;
b. The examination must be under oath;
c. The examination must be in writing in the form of
searching questions and answers;
d. All of the above
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 137
24. A warrantless arrest is considered legitimate
or valid and it includes a valid warrantless
search and seizure in:
a. Arrest in flagrante delicto; c. Arrests of escape
prisoner;
b. Arrest effected in hot pursuit; d. All of the
above
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 138
b. Seizure of evidence in plain view; d. Stop and frisk
situations
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 139
c. Used or intended to be used as the means of
committing an offense
d. All of the above
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 140
32. Persons protected by the provisions
against unreasonable search and seizure.
a. Citizens of the Philippines only within the jurisdiction of
the Philippines
b. To all persons whether citizens or aliens within the
jurisdiction of the State
c. To all persons accused of acts and omissions
punishable under the Revised Penal Code
d. All of them
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 141
35. Of the four requisites for issuing search
warrant, one of the following is not included..
a. The warrant issued must particularly described the
person who committed the crime
b. It must be issued upon probable cause;
c. The probable cause must be determined by the judge
himself and not by the applicant or any other person;
d. In the determination of probable cause the judge must
examine under oath affirmation, the complainant and
such witness as the latter may product
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 144
46. The duty of the party to present evidence to
establish his claim is referred to as:
a. Burden of proof c. Bill of particulars
b. Burden of evidence d. Presentation of
evidence
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 145
51. In civil cases, the person charged is referred
to as:
a. Accused c. Defendant
b. Suspect d. Respondent
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 146
a. Counsel c. Attorney on record
b. Attorney at law d. Counsel de officio
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 147
d. All of the above
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 149
68. The presence of the offended party shall be
required during the arraignment for the purpose
of:
a. Plea bargaining c. B only
b. Determination of civil liability d. All of the
above
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 150
a. Territory c. Venue
b. Jurisdiction d. Motion
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 151
76. Criminal cases where the penalty
prescribed by law for the offense charged does
not six months falls under the rule on:
a. Regular procedure c. Summary
procedure
b. Criminal procedure d. Civil Procedure
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 152
d. The offense committed
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 153
a. Doctrine of parents patria c. Doctrine of non-
suability
b. Police power d. Habeas corpus
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 154
a. Provincial or city prosecutors c. National and
Regional state prosecutors
b. Judges of the lower courts d. All of the above
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 156
b. Acquittal of the accused e. Execution of the
final judgment of conviction
c. Death of the prosecutor
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 157
100. The following grounds are not considered
waived even if the accused fails to move to
quash the compliant or information, except:
a. Lack of jurisdiction of the offense;
b. Extinction of the offense charged;
c. The information fails to charge an offense;
d. The officer who filed the complaint lacks authority to do.
3. Charlie and Lea had been married for more than 6 months.They
live together with the children of Lea from her first husband.
Charlie had sexual relation with Jane, the 14 year old daughter
of
Lea.Jane loves Charlie very much.What was the
crime committed
by Charlie?
A. Simple Seduction
B. Qualified Seduction
C. Consented Abduction
D. Rape
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 158
Answer: B
4. Prof. Jose gave a failing grade to one of his students, Lito. When
the two met the following day, Lito slapped
Prof. Jose on the face. What was the crime committed by Lito?
A. Corruption of Public Officials
B. Direct Assault
C. Slight Physical Injuries
D. Grave Coercion
Answer: B
5. A warrant of arrest was issued against Fred for the killing of his
parents. When PO2 Tapang tried to arrest him,Fred gave him
1
million pesos to set him free. PO2 Tapang refrained in arresting
Fred. What was the crime committed by PO2 Tapang?
A. Indirect Bribery
B. Direct Bribery
C. Corruption of Public Officials
D. Qualified Bribery
Answer: D
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 159
B. General Jurisdiction
C. Original Jurisdiction
D. Exclusive Jurisdiction
Answer: C
12. It refers to a territorial unit where the power of the court is to
be exercised.
A. jurisdiction
B. jurisprudence
C. venue
D. bench
Answer: C
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 160
A. grave threat
B. grave coercion
C. direct assault
D. slander by deed
Answer: B
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 161
Answer: C
22. Those who, not being principals cooperate in the execution of
the offense by previous or simultaneous acts.
A. Accomplices
B. Suspects
C. principal actors
D. accessories
Answer: A
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 162
Answer: B
27.
The willful and corrupt assertion of falsehood under oath of
affirmation, administered by authority of law on a material
matter.
A. libel
B. falsification
C. perjury
D. slander
Answer: C
30. The failure to perform a positive duty which one is bound to.
A. Negligence
B. imprudence
C. omission
D. act
Answer: C
31. Ways and means are employed for the purpose of trapping and
capturing the law breaker in the execution of his criminal plan.
A. Misfeasance
B. entrapment
C. inducement
D. instigation
Answer: B
32. Those where the act committed is a crime but for reasons of
public policy and sentiment there is no penalty imposed.
A. impossible crimes
B. aggravating circumstances
C. absolutory causes
D. Complex Crimes
Answer: C
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 163
33. One of the following is an alternative circumstance.
A. Insanity
B. intoxication
C. passion or obfuscation
D. evident premeditation
Answer: B
35. At what time may the accused move to quash the complaint or
information?
A. at any time before his arrest
B. only after entering his plea
C. any time before entering his plea
D. Monday morning
Answer: C
36. The process whereby the accused and the prosecutor in a
criminal case work out a mutually satisfactory
disposition on the case subject to court approval.
A. Arraignment
B. plea bargaining
C. preliminary investigation
D. trial
Answer: B
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 164
B. Arraignment
C. pre-trial
D. judgment
Answer: A
41. It is evidence of the same kind and to the same state of facts.
A. secondary evidence
B. prima facie evidence
C. corroborative evidence
D. best evidence
Answer: C
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 165
Answer: A
44. When the witness states that he did not see or know the
occurrence of a fact.
A. positive evidence
B. corroborative evidence
C. secondary evidence
D. negative evidence
Answer: D
45. Personal property that can be subjects for search and seizure.
A. used or intended to be used as means in committing
an
offense
B. stolen or embezzled and other proceeds or fruits of the
offense
C. subject of the offense
D. all of the above
Answer: D
46. All persons who can perceive and perceiving, can make known
their perception to others.
A. Suspects
B. witnesses
C. victims
D. informers
Answer: B
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 166
49. A question which arises in a case the resolution of which is the
logical antecedent of the issue involved in said case and the
cognizance of which pertains to another tribunal.
A. legal question
B. juridical question
C. prejudicial question
D. judicial question
Answer: C
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 167
55. The law which reimposed the death penalty.
A. RA 5425
B. RA 8553
C. RA 7659
D. RA 8551
Answer: C
56. One who is deprived completely of reason or discernment and
freedom of the will at the time of the commission of the crime.
A. discernment
B. insanity
C. epilepsy
D. imbecility
Answer: D
58. Something that happen outside the sway of our will, and
although it comes about through some acts of our will,
lies beyond the bound s of humanly foreseeable consequences.
A. fortuitous event
B. fate
C. accident
D. destiny
Answer: C
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 168
C. right to remain silent
D. right against self-incrimination
Answer: B
64. When the offender enjoys and delights in making his victim
suffers slowly and gradually, causing him unnecessary physical
pain in the consummation of the criminal act.
A. Ignominy
B. cruelty
C. treachery
D. masochism
Answer: B
65. One, who at the time of his trial for one crime shall have been
previously convicted by final judgment of another crime
embraced
in the same title of the Revised Penal Code.
A. Recidivism
B. habitual delinquency
C. reiteracion
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 169
D. quasi-recidivism
Answer: A
67. The law hears before it condemns, proceeds upon inquiry and
render judgment after a fair trial.
A. ex post facto law
B. equal protection of the law
C. rule of law
D. due process of law
Answer: D
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 170
D. hearsay
Answer: A
72. A method fixed by law for the apprehension and prosecution of
persons alleged to have committed a crime, and
or their punishment in case of conviction
A. Criminal Law
B. Criminal Evidence
C. Criminal Procedure
D. Criminal Jurisprudence
Answer: C
76. The improper performance of some act which might lawfully be
done.
A. misfeasance
B. malfeasance
C. nonfeasance
D. dereliction
Answer: B
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 171
C. warrant
D. affidavit
Answer: D
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 172
B. arbitrary detention
C. compulsory detention
D. unauthorized detention
Answer: B
88. It means that the resulting injury is greater than that which is
intended.
A. Aberratio ictus
B. Error in personae
C. Dura Lex Sed lex
D. Praeter Intentionem
Answer: D
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 173
C. Dura lex sed lex
D. Praeter Intentionem
Answer: A
90. A stage of execution when all the elements necessary for its
execution and accomplishment are present.
A. Attempted
B. Frustrated
C. Consummated
D. Accomplished
answer:C
91. An act or omission which is the result of a misapprehension of
facts that is voluntary but not intentional.
A. Absolutory Cause
B. Mistake of facts
C. Conspiracy
D. Felony
Answer: B
92. Crimes that have three stages of execution.
A. Material
B. Formal
C. Seasonal
D. Continuing
Answer: A
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 174
Answer:A
96. A character of Criminal Law, making it binding upon all persons
who live or sojourn in the Philippines.
A. General
B. Territorial
C. Prospective
D. Retroactive
Answer: A
98. The taking of a person into custody in order that he may be
bound to answer for the commission of an offense.
A. Search
B. Seizure
C. Arrest
D. Detention
Answer: C
99. Pedro stole the cow of Juan. What was the crime committed?
A. Robbery
B. Farm Theft
C. Qualified Theft
D. SimpleTheft
Answer: C
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 175
CRIMINAL JURISPRUDENCE
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 176
inference which might otherwise have been caused
from the original evidence.
A. Affirmative Admissibility B.
Corrective Admissibility
C. Multiple Admissibility D.
Conditional Admissibility
E. Curative Admissibility
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 177
6.) What is the categorical acknowledgement of guilt
made by an accused in a criminal case, without any
exculpatory statement or explanation?
A. Statement B. Affidavit
C. Confession
D. Admission E. Judicial
confession
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 178
C. When there is a failure of the written agreement to express the
true intent and agreement of the parties thereto
D. When there arises a question as to the
validity of the written agreement
E. When there exist other terms agreed to by the parties or their
successors in interest after the execution of the written agreement
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 179
A. An extra job B. The job of the police
C. A judicial function D. Non-judicial
function E. C and / or D
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 180
16.) What principle of law requires that the judiciary
can do nothing but to apply a law, even in cases where
doing such would seem to result in grave injustice?
A. None of these B. Dura lex
sed lex
C. Vox populi vox Dei D. Ignorantia legis
non excusat
E. Aberratio ictus
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 181
A. Slight physical injuries B. Less
serious physical injuries
C. Attempted homicide
D. Reckless imprudence resulting to physical
injuries
E. Serious physical injuries
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 182
B. Not a ground for a motion to quash the
information filed
C. A ground for a motion to quash the information
filed
D. Not a ground for filing a demurrer to evidence
E. The failure to waive such right
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 183
D. Attempted homicide E. Frustrated
homicide
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 184
29.) It is the quality by which an act may be ascribed to
a person as its author.
A. Guilty B. Imputability C.
Responsibility
D. Liability E. All of the above
30.) Who has the burden of proof in cases where self-
defense is used?
A. All of these B. The prosecutor
C. The victim
D. The accused E. The state
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 185
33.) What penalty is to be imposed in case of a wrong
committed by simple imprudence or negligence which,
if done maliciously, would have constituted a light
felony?
A. Arresto menor B. Arresto mayor
C. Destierro
D. Public censure E. Fine
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 186
37.) Within how many days from receipt of the records,
the provincial or city prosecutor, or the Ombudsman or
his deputy, as the case may be, shall review the
resolution of the investigating judge on the existence of
probable cause.
A. 5 B. 10
C. 15
D. 30 E. 60
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 187
A. Murder B. Parricide C.
Robbery in an inhabited house D. Qualified
theft E. All of the above
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 188
C. The nature of the injury inflicted D.
The manner of attack E. The planning
made
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 189
48.) Brent and Joy were about to be married. Because
of texting, joy eloped with Jeffrey, Brent’s best friend.
With intent premeditation, Brent surreptitiously went to
the house of Jeffrey. Upon seeing Jeffrey, Brent
stabbed Jeffrey at the back. What is the “motive” in this
crime?
A. Revenge B. Premeditation C.
Stabbing
D. Barging in the house E.
Texting
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 190
D. Efren was not committing felony
E. Peter’s death is accidental under Article 12,
paragraph 4 of R.P.C.
52.) Thomas with intent to injure drew his gun and shot
Paul. James, a nine-year old boy who was playing
nearby was hit with the stray bullet. James suffered an
injury which made him hospitalized for 45 days. What
case should be filed against Thomas concerning the
injury of James?
A. None, because his intent was to injure Paul.
B. Frustrated murder he performed all the acts of execution
necessary to commit the felony
C. Frustrated homicide because he missed to hit
Paul
D. Reckless Imprudence Resulting in Serious
Physical Injuries
E. Serious Physical Injuries
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 191
held the wrist of the man, the latter suddenly turned his
ire to Gerry by punching and kicking him. Against
Gerry, the unidentified man is liable for-
A. Direct assault B. Physical injury C.
indirect assault
D. Unjust vexation E. Tumultuous
affray
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 192
57.) The following are the circumstances which imply
that the death is presumed to be the natural
consequence of the physical injuries inflicted, except-
A. None of these
B. The resulting injury is due to the intentional act of the
victim.
C. The victim at the time the physical injuries were inflicted was
strong and in normal health.
D. The death occurred within a reasonable time from the assault.
E. The death is expected from the nature and location of the
wound.
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 193
A. Proof beyond reasonable ground B. proof that
evidence of guilt is strong
C. Probable cause D. Direct
evidence
E. all of the above
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 194
64.) Simon with intent to take the cellular phone of
Jude who was then leaning on his seat under a tree
slashed the neck of Jude and then took his cellular
phone. Upon investigation, it turned out that Jude had
been dead several hours before the incident. Simon
will be liable for-
A. Accomplice
B. Principal by direct participation
C. Principal by inducement
D. Principal by indispensable cooperation
E. Accessory
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 195
67.) Romeo stole the mp3 of his boss and sold it for the
amount of Php 10,000. After spending part of the
money, Romeo gave Php 3,000 to Jonah, his long time
fiancé. Jonah is liable as –
A. None of these
B. Accomplice
C. Principal by inducement
D. Principal by indispensable cooperation
A. none of these
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 196
B. the penalty is arresto mayor or a fine from 200
to 500 pesos
C. when another crime is committed there can be
no impossible crime
D. there is no attempted or frustrated impossible
crime.
E. the act performed should not constituted
another offence specifically punished by law
particularly a felony against persons or
property.
A. Noise barrage
B. Revelry
C. Charivari
D. Street dancing
E. Parade
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 197
72.) What is that pertaining to any form of attestation
by which a person signifies that he is bound in
conscience to perform an act faithfully and truthfully?
A. Affidavit
B. Sworn statement
C. Deposition
D. Allegiance
E. Oath
A.None of these
B. Not need a search warrant
C. Need a search warrant
D. Not need a search warrant but a valid search
warrant should be issued later
E. Need to be reviewed later
A. Information B. Complain C.
Complaint
D. Affidavit E. B and / or C
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 199
A. Government employee B. Notary public C.
Public officer
D. Public officials E. All of the above
A. Attempted B. Frustrated C.
Consummated
D. A, B, and C E. B and C only
A. Misfeasance B. Malfeasance C.
Nonfeasance
D. Negligence E. All of the above
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 200
which decides some point or matter, but which,
however is not the final decision of the matter in issue.
A. Court order B. Supreme
Court Ruling C. Judgment
D. Interlocutory order E.
Provisionary order
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 202
89.) What is the prescription period of Death and
Reclusion Perpetua?
A. 30 years B. 40 years C. 20 years
D. 10 years E. 5 years
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 203
D. Rebellion E. Insurrection
94.) Rebellion, Sedition, and Disloyalty are crimes
against-
A. All o0f these B. Public security C.
National Government
D. Public order E. National Security
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 205
D. When it is not repugnant in taste E.
When it is not immoral
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 206
1. In case of the conviction of the accused, who will pay the cost of the proceedings.
A. Relatives of the accused C. The winning party
B. The accused D. The State
2. If the property of the accused is not sufficient for the payment of all the pecuniary liabilities, which
will be given the
first priority to be paid?
A. The cost of the proceedings C. The indemnification of the consequential
damages
B. the fine D. The reparation of the damaged cause
3. What is the equivalent rate of the subsidiary personal liability if the accused has no property with
which to pay the
fine in the decision of the court.
A. One day of each Ten Pesos C. One day for each Fifteen Pesos
B. One day for each Eight Pesos D. One day for each twenty Pesos
4. If the accused was prosecuted for grave or less grave felony and the principal penalty imposed is
only a fine, how
long shall be the subsidiary imprisonment of the accused.
A. Three (3) months C. Four (4) months
B. Six (6) months D. Five (5) months
5. If the accused was prosecuted for light felonies only, and the principal penalty is only fine, how
long shall be the
subsidiary imprisonment of the accused.
A. Ten (10) days C. Six (6) days
B. Twelve (12) days D. Fifteen (15) days
6. It is a subsidiary personal liability to be suffered by the convict who has no property with which to
meet the fine.
A. Pecuniary penalty C. Subsidiary penalty
B. Administrative penalty D. Correctional penalty
7. What is the accessory penalty of reclusion perpetua and reclusion temporal.
A. Civil interdiction for life C. Suspension of the right of suffrage
B. Suspension of the right to hold office. D. No accessory penalty
8. What is the accessory penalty of Destierro.
A. Civil interdiction for life
B. Suspension from public office, profession or calling
C. Suspension of the right to suffrage
D. No accessory penalty
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 207
9. Every penalty imposed for the commission of a felony shall carry with it the ___________ of the
proceeds of the
crime and the instruments or tools with which it was committed.
A. Destruction C. Auction
B. Forfeiture D. Removal
10. The proceeds and instruments or tools of the crime shall be taken in favor of the __________.
A. Victim C. Third party
B. Accused D. Government
11. When can confiscation of the proceeds or property or instruments of the crimes be ordered by the
court.
A. When it submitted in evidence
B. When it is not placed at the disposal of the court
C. When it is owned by the victim
D. When it is owned by the accused
12. Articles which are forfeited, when the order of forfeiture is already final cannot be returned even in
case
of an __________
A. Revival of the case C. Appeal
B. Acquittal D. Refilling of the case
13. The penalty prescribed by law for the commission of a felony shall be imposed upon the _______
in the
commission of the felony.
A. Accessories C. Principals
B. Accomplices D. Co- accused
14. It is the penalty which cannot be imposed when the guilty party is more than seventy years of
age.
A. Reclusion Perpetua C. Death penalty
B. Prison correctional D. Arresto Mayor
15. A single out act constitute two or more grave or less grave felonies is a ____________ crime.
A. Grave offense C. Less grave offense
B. Complex crime D. Continuing crime
16. In defense of relatives, one of the relatives that can be defended are those relatives by
consanguinity within the
fourth civil degree, such as _____________.
A. Brothers and sisters C. First cousin
B. Uncle and niece D. Second cousin
17. When somebody defended a very distant relative, he is committing ________.
A. Self defense C. Defense of stranger
B. Defense of relative D. Fulfillment of duty
18. A person considered as _________ is exempt in all cases from criminal liability.
A. Insane C. Feebleminded
B. Imbecile D. Epileptic
19. During this lucid interval, an insane person acts with _________.
A. Emotions C. Intelligence
B. Anxiety D. Depression
20. It is the __________ who has the burden of proof to show insanity.
A. Prosecution C. Court
B. Defense D. Prosecutor
21. It is a single crime, consisting of a series of acts but all arising from one criminal resolution.
A. Plural crime C. Habitual crime
B. Continuing crime D. Revolving crime
22. A person shall be deemed to be ________ if within a period of ten years from the date of his
release or last
conviction of the crimes of serious or less serious physical injuries, estafa, or falsification, he is
found guilty of
any of said crimes a third time or oftener.
A. Recidivist C. Ex – convict
B. Habitual delinquent D. Pardonee
23. In imposing fines, the court may fix any amount within the limits established by law; in fixing the
amount in each
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 208
case attention shall be given, not only to the mitigating and aggravating circumstances, but
more particularly
to the ________ of the defendant.
A. Education C. Health
B. Wealth and means D. Age
24. Whenever any prisoner shall have served the ________ penalty imposed on him, it shall appear
to the Board
of Indeterminate Sentence that such prisoner is fitted for release, said Board may authorize
the release
of such prisoner on parole, upon such terms and conditions as may be prescribed by the
Board.
A. Medium C. Minimum
B. Maximum D. One half
25. It is the disposition under which a defendant after conviction and sentence is released subject to
conditions imposed by the court and to the supervision of a probation officer.
A. Parole C. Probation
B. Recognition D. Pardon
26. A person placed on probation.
A. Parolee C. Pardonee
B. Probationer D. Ex- convict
27. One who investigate for the court a referral for probation or supervises a probationer or both
A. Parole officer C. Probation officer
B. Police officer D. Administrative officer
28. No penalty shall be executed except by virtue of a _________ judgment.
A. In terim C. De Jure
B. Final D. Temporary
29. When a convict becomes insane or imbecile after final sentence has been pronounced, the
execution of said
sentence is __________ only as regards the personal penalty.
A. Continued C. Extinct
B. Suspended D. Enforced
30. If the convict becomes insane or imbecile after the final sentence, the payment of his ________
shall not be
suspended.
A. Criminal liability C. Civil or pecuniary liabilities
B. Administrative liability D. Personal liability
31. Whenever a minor or either sex under 18 years of age at the time of the commission of a grave or
less grave
felony, is accused thereof, the court, after hearing the evidence in the proper proceedings,
instead of
pronouncing judgment of conviction, shall ___________ all further proceedings and shall
commit such minor
to the custody and care of a public or private charitable institution.
A. Proceed C. Set aside
B. Suspend D. Prolong
32. If the minor has behaved properly or has complied with the conditions imposed upon him during
his confinement,
in accordance with the provisions of Art. 80 he shall be returned to the ____________ in order
that the same
may order his final release.
A. DSWD C. Court
B. Parents D. Relatives / guardians
33. In case the minor fails to behave properly or to comply with the regulations of the institution to
which he was
committed, or he was found to be incorrigible he shall be returned to the court in order that the
same may
_________ corresponding to the crime committed by him.
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 209
A. Render the judgment C. Order extension of his commitment
B. Order his release D. Order his rehabilitation
34. The expenses for the maintenance of the minor delinquent confined in the institution to which he
has been
committed, shall be borne totally or partially by _________ or those persons liable to support
him, if they are
able to do so in the discretion of the court.
A. DSWD C. Institution
B. Parents or relatives D. State
35. Under the new law, the age of majority is ___________.
A. 21 years old C. 18 years old
B. 15 years old D. 16 years old
36. Any person sentenced to ___________ shall not be permitted to enter the place or places
designated in the
sentenced, nor within the radius therein specified.
A. Arresto Mayor C. Destierro
B. Aresto Menor D. Prision Mayor
37. The radius specified in the penalty of destierro shall be _____________.
A. Not less than 25kms. But not more than 200 kms.
B. Not less than 20 kms. But not more than 225 kms.
C. Not less than 5 kms. But not more than 125 kms.
D. Not less than 25 kms. But not more than 250 kms.
38. The penalty of ____________ shall be served in the municipal jail or in the house of the
defendant under the
surveillance of an officer of the law.
A. Arresto Mayor C. Prision correccional
B. Arresto Menor D. Prision Mayor
39. As the personal penalties, criminal liability of the accused is totally extinguished upon his
_________.
A. Incarceration C. Death
B. Conviction D. Confinement
40. The pecuniary liabilities of the convict is extinguished only when the death of the offender occurs
_______.
A. After the final judgment C. During the pendency of the case
B. Before the final judgment D. During the hearing of the case
41. It is not one of the grounds of extinction of criminal liability of the accused.
A. By voluntary surrender
B. By service of sentence
C. By absolute pardon
D. By prescription of the crime
42. Amado was change with homicide during the pendency of the case Amado died what will happen
to the
Case filed against him.
A. The case will continue to be heared.
B. The case will be suspended.
C. The case will set aside.
D. The case will be dismissed.
43. Berto was sentenced in the regional trial court. He appealed the case to the court of appeals.
During the
pendency of his appeal, Berto died. What will happen to his civil and criminal liability?
A. The civil and criminal liability is not extinguished?
B. The civil and environmental liability is extinguished?
C. The civil and criminal liability will be suspended.
D. The civil and criminal liability is set a side.
44. It is an act of grace proceeding from the power entrusted with the execution of the laws which the
individual
On whom it is bestowed from the punishment the law inflicts for the crime he has committed.
A. Parole C. Prescription of penalty
B. Pardon D. Prescription of crime
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 210
45. It is the forfeiture or loss of the right of the state to prosecute the offender after the lapse of a
certain time.
A. prescription of crime C. Parole
B. Prescription of penalty D. Probation
46. It is the loss or forfeiture of the right of the government to execute the final sentence after the
lapse of a certain
Time.
A. Amnesty C. Prescription of penalty
B. Pardon D. Prescription of criminal
47. Crimes punishable by reclusion perpetua or reclusion temporal shall prescribed in _____
A. 10yrs C. 20yrs.
B. 12yrs D. 15yrs.
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 211
59. It is the prerogative of the Executive to extend this to the offender at any time after the imposition
of the final
judgment.
A. Parole C. Probation
B. Amnesty D. Conditional Pardon
60. It is an Executive clemency given to the convicted offender after the offender has served the
minimum penalty
through the Board of Pardons and Parole.
A. Parole C. Amnesty
B. Pardon D. Probation
61. Every person criminally liable for a felony is also _____ liable.
A. Administratively C. Personally
B. Civily D. Socially
62. It is one of the extinguishment o9f civil liability.
A. Serving of sentence C. Amnesty
B. By compensation D. Parole
63. It is included in civil liability.
A. Restitution C. Indemnification for damages consequential
B. Reparation of the damage caused D. All of the above
64. The civil liability for acts committed by a youthful offender shall be paid by the offenders _____.
A. Parents C. Relative
B. Guardians D. All of the above
65. A prisoner who showed good conduct inside the penal institution shall be allowed a deduction of
his penalty for a
period of _____ for each month of good behavior during the first two years of his imprisonment.
A. Five days C. Eight days
B. Ten days D. Fifteen days
66. During the 3rd to 5th year of his imprisonment the prisoner shall be allowed a deduction of _____
for each month
of good behavior.
A. Fifteen days C. Five days
B. Eight days D. Ten days
67. During the 6th year until the tenth year, of his imprisonment, the prisoner shall be allowed a
deduction of _____for
each month of good behavior.
A. Eight days C. Ten days
B. Five days D. Fifteen days
68. During the eleventh and successive years of his imprisonment, the prisoner shall be allowed a
deduction of _____ for each month of good behavior.
A. Five days C. Ten days
B. Eight days D. Fifteen days
69. Ana was charged with the crime of adultery together with his boyfriend. Ana, the married woman
after conviction, her husband pardoned her alone is the pardon effective?
A. Yes because she was pardoned by her husband
B. No, the pardon should include the man to be effective.
C. Yes, because it is voluntary given by the husband,
D. No, because pardon can only be given by the Chief Executive
70. When a single act constitute two or more grave or less grave felonies, or when an offense is
necessary means for committing the other, the penalty for _____ shall be imposed in its maximum.
A. The less serious crime C. The most serious crime
B. The light offense D. The most common crime
Questions 71 to 85
Write A if both statements are correct; B if first statement is correct and the second is
incorrect.
C if the first statement is incorrect and the second is correct; D if both statements
are incorrect.
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 212
___A_ 71. Subsidiary imprisonment is not an accessory penalty. It is a penalty for it is imposed upon
the accused
and served by him in lieu of the fine which he fails to pay on account of insolvency.
__B__72. One of the pecuniary penalties of the offender is reparation of the damaged caused. The
pecuniary
Liabilities applies only in case the property of the offender is sufficient for the payment of
all his pecuniary
liabilities.
___C__ 73. The subsidiary personal, liability of the offender is at the rate of one day for each ten
pesos. The convict
who served subsidiary penalty may still be required to pay the fine.
___D_ 74. When the court merely imposes a fine, the subsidiary liability shall not exceed one year.
The proceeds of
the crime as well as the tools and instruments shall be forfeited and confiscated in
favor of the victim.
__A_ 75. The confiscation of the proceeds or tools or instruments of the crime can be ordered only if
they are
submitted in evidence or placed at the disposal of the court. Articles which are
forfeited, when the
order of forfeiture is already final, cannot be returned even in case of acquittal.
___B__ 76. The penalty prescribed by law for the commission of a felony shall be imposed upon the
principals in the
commission of such felony. According to Art. 47 of the RPC death penalty may be
imposed when
the guilty person be more than 70 years of age.
___C__ 77. A complex crime is not considered as one crime. One of the kinds of complex crime is
when an offense is
A necessary means for committing another crime.
__D___ 78. A continuing crime is not a single crime consisting of series of acts but all is not arising
from one criminal
resolution. In continuing offense, although there is a series of acts, there are several
crimes committed.
__A___ 79. Indeterminate Sentence Law is an act which provide for an indeterminate sentence and
parole for all
persons convicted of certain crimes by the courts of the Philippine Island. The act shall
not apply to
persons convicted of offenses punished with death penalty of life imprisonment.
___A__ 80. The court must, instead of single fixed penalty, determine two penalties, referred to in the
Indeterminate
Sentence Act as the Maximum and Minimum terms. Indeterminate Sentence Law does
not apply
to those who are habitual delinquents.
___A_ 81. Probation may be granted whether the sentence imposes a term of imprisonment or a fine
only. The
probation law does not apply to offenders sentenced to serve a maximum of more than
six years.
___A__ 82. If the convict is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not more than one year, the
period of probation
shall not exceed two years. In all other cases, if he is sentenced to more than one year,
said probation
period shall not exceed six years
__B___ 83. Minor delinquents are not confined in a penitentiary to prevent their association with
matured and
hardened criminals. Their confinement in a charitable institution is considered a penalty.
___C__ 84. Art. 80 of the RPC (Suspension of sentence of minors) is applicable only to light
felonies. If a light
felony is committed by a minor, he is not subject to imprisonment, because he is entitled
to a penalty of
one degree lower at least
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 213
___B__ 85. The criminal liability is totally extinguished by service of sentence. It is also extinguished
by means of
parole.
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 214
1. What crime is committed when a person, through force, inserts his penis into another person’s mouth or
anal orifice?
A. Simple rape C. Qualified rape
B. Rape by sexual assault D. Acts of Lasciviousness
2. If a person wounds, assaults or beats another person causing deformity on the latter, the crime
committed is:
A. Serious physical injuries C. Slight physical injuries
B. Less serious physical injuries D. Mutilation
3. What crime is committed when a person, without intent to kill, inflicts upon another any serious physical
injury, by knowingly administering to him any injurious substances or beverages?
A. Serious physical injuries C. Mutilation
B. Less serious physical injuries D. Administering injurious substances or beverages
4. MAGDA, a prostitute, agreed to have sex with a customer for the amount of P1,000.00. While in the
motel, the customer started kissing MAGDA. MAGDA noticed that the customer has bad breath.
Eventually, she pulled away from the customer and refused to have sex with him. Angered by the
refusal, the customer forced himself on MAGDA who was able to accomplish his carnal desires on the
latter. What crime, if any, did the customer commit?
A. Rape C. Acts of lasciviousness
B. Seduction D. No crime was committed
6. NENE, a 10-year old girl, consented to have sex with her 20-year old neighbor HOMER who looks like
John Lloyd Cruz. What crime, if any, did HOMER commit?
A. Simple rape C. Qualified rape
B. Violation of child abuse law D. Qualified Seduction
7. What crime is committed when a police officer takes advantage of his position to rape another person?
A. Simple rape C. Sexual assault
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 215
B. Qualified rape D. None of these
8. Any private person who shall enter the dwelling of another against the latter’s will commits the crime of:
A. Qualified trespass to dwelling C. Trespass to property
B. Simple trespass to dwelling D. Violation of domicile
9. Due to the passage of the Anti-rape law of 1997, Rape is now classified as:
A. Crime against chastity C. Crime against liberty
B. Crime against persons D. None of these
10. If the person kidnapped or detained shall be a female, the crime is:
A. Kidnapping and serious illegal detention C. Slavery
B. Slight illegal detention D. Arbitrary detention
11. It is a crime committed by anyone who, under the pretext of reimbursing himself of a debt incurred by
an ascendant, guardian or person entrusted with the custody of a minor, shall, against the latter’s will,
retain him in his service.
A. Slavery C. Exploitation of minors
B. Abandoning a minor D. Exploitation of child labor
12. It is committed by any person who, with intent to gain but without violence against or intimidation of
persons nor force upon things, shall take personal property of another without the latter’s consent
A. Robbery C. Theft
B. Estafa D. Piracy
13. It is a felony committed by any person who shall threaten another with the infliction upon the person,
honor, property of the latter or of his family of any wrong amounting to a crime
A. Grave coercion C. Grave threats
B. Light coercion D. Light threats
14. Any person who shall deliberately cause to the property of another any damage that does not constitute
arson shall be guilty for what crime?
A. Unjust vexation D. Damage to property
B. Malicious mischief D. None of these
17. LOLO ROMEO fondled the breast of her 15 year-old granddaughter WENDY. WENDY did not resist the
advances of her LOLO and in fact, she stated to him to continue what he is doing. What crime, if any,
did LOLO ROMEO commit?
A. Acts of Lasciviousness C. Seduction
B. Acts of Lasciviousness with the consent D. Attempted Rape
Of the offended party
19. A person who engages in the business of prostitution is liable for what felony?
A. Prostitution C. White slave trade
B. Slavery D. Vagrancy
20. While walking within the premises of a coconut plantation owned by JOEY, ROLAND saw a piece of
coconut on the ground. ROLAND decided to get the coconut and bring it home as a “pasalubong” to his
son. What crime, if any, did ROLAND commit?
A. Simple theft C. Robbery
B. Qualified theft D. Estafa
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 216
21. It is the seduction of a woman who is single and of good reputation, over twelve but under eighteen
years of age, and committed by means of deceit
A. Simple seduction C. Forcible abduction
B. Qualified seduction D. Acts of Lasciviousness
22. KURT has a longstanding grudge against his neighbor JIMI. One day, while JIMI was away, KURT
surreptitiously poisoned the cow of JIMI resulting in the death of the cow. What crime, if any, did KURT
commit?
A. Malicious mischief C. Unjust vexation
B. Violation of PD 533 (Anti-cattle rustling law) D. Physical injuries
23. MICHELLE MASIPAG worked as a housemaid and yaya of the one-week old son of the spouses PETER
and PAULA. When MICHELLE learned that her 70 year-old mother was seriously ill, she asked PETER for
a cash advance of P1,000.00, but PETER refused. One morning, MICHELLE gagged the mouth of
PETER’s son with stockings; placed the child in a box; sealed it with masking tape and placed the box in
the attic. Later in the afternoon, she demanded P5,000.00 as ransom for the release of his son. PETER
did not pay the ransom. Subsequently, MICHELLE disappeared.
After a couple of days, PETER discovered the box in the attic with his child already dead. According to
the
autopsy report, the child died of asphyxiation barely three minutes after the box was sealed. What crime/s did
MICHELLE commit?
A. Kidnapping and serious illegal detention C. Kidnapping with homicide
B. Slight illegal detention with homicide D. Kidnapping and homicide
24. Unjust vexation is a:
A. Crime against security C. Crime against chastity
B. Crime against property D. None of these
25. Malicious mischief is a:
A. Crime against property C. Crime against persons
B. Crime against liberty D. None of these
26. SARAH and NONITO are sweethearts. As a birthday gift, NONITO gave SARAH a BlackBerry cell phone.
Two days later, SARAH broke up with NONITO because she caught the latter cheating on her. SARAH
decided to burn the cell phone that NONITO gave her. What crime, if any, did SARAH commit?
A. Arson C. Damage to property
B. Malicious mischief D. No crime was committed
27. In an interview aired on television, DINA uttered defamatory statements against CARMEN, a successful and
reputable businesswoman. What crime, if any, did DINA commit?
A. Slander C. Incriminating innocent persons
B. Libel D. No crime was committed
28. It consists in voluntarily, but without malice, doing or failing to do an act from which material damage results
by reason of inexcusable lack of precaution on the part of the person performing or failing to perform such act.
A. Reckless imprudence C. Offense
B. Simple imprudence D. None of these
29. It is the abduction of any woman against her will and with lewd designs
A. Consented abduction C. Kidnapping
B. Forcible abduction D. None of these
30. SIMON entered the house of another without employing force or violence upon things. He was seen by a
maid who wanted to scream but was prevented from doing so because SIMON threatened her with a gun.
SIMON then took money and other valuables and left. What crime, if any, did SIMON commit?
31. Seduction is a:
A. Crime against honor C. Crime against chastity
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 217
B. Crime against persons D. Crime against liberty
32. Libel is a:
A. Crime against persons C. Crime against chastity
B. Crime against property D. Crime against honor
33. A fire broke out in a department store. SID, taking advantage of the confusion, entered the store and carried
away goods, which he later sold. What crime, if any, did SID commit?
A. Robbery C. Qualified theft
B. Theft D. Estafa
34. Any person who shall defraud another with unfaithfulness or abuse of confidence shall be liable for what
crime?
A. Theft C. Qualified theft
B. Robbery D. Estafa
35. DANTE and DIEGO ate at a restaurant near Our Lady of Fatima University in Valenzuela City. Because it is
lunch time, the restaurant was crowded. Realizing that they can leave the restaurant unnoticed without having
their bill for the food they ate, paid, the two clandestinely left the place. After two days, the police apprehended
the two. What crime, if any, did DANTE and DIEGO commit?
A. Theft C. Estafa
B. Qualfied theft D. No crime was committed
37. It is a crime committed by any person who, in any case other than those authorized by law, or without
reasonable ground therefore, shall arrest or detains another for the purpose of delivering him to the proper
authorities.
A. Arbitrary detention C. Illegal detention
B. Unlawful arrest D. Kidnapping
38. It is committed by any person who, without authority of law, shall by means of violence, threats or
intimidation, prevent another from doing something not prohibited by law, or compel him to do something
against his will, whether it be right or wrong.
a. Grave coercions c. Light coercions
b. Grave threats d. Light threats
39. Any person who shall orally threaten to do another any harm not constituting a felony is liable for what
crime, if any?
A. Coercion C. Unjust vexation
B. Other light threats D. No crime was committed
40. A private individual who, in order to discover the secrets of another, shall seize his papers or letters and
reveal the contents thereof is liable for what felony?
A. Infidelity in the custody of documents C. Theft
B. Discovering secrets through seizure of D. Estafa
Correspondence
42. To constitute a band under Art. 296 of the Revised Penal Code, there must be how many armed persons
taking part in a robbery?
A. More than three C. Three or more
B. Three D. Less than three
43. A person who possesses a picklock without lawful cause is liable for what crime, if any?
A. Theft C. Fencing
B. Possession of picklocks D. No crime was committed
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 218
44. A person who uses a picklock or other similar tools in the commission of robbery shall be guilty of what
crime?
A. Robbery C. Fencing
B. Possession of picklocks D. Robbery and possession of picklocks
45. CAROL and CINDY are sisters. Both are college students in the College of Criminology of Our Lady of Fatima
University in Valenzuela City. They both live with their parents. CAROL has a cute shih tzu dog; one day while
CAROL was away on a date, CINDY took the dog without the consent of CAROL and sold it to her classmate.
What crime did CINDY commit?
A. Robbery C. Malicious mischief
B. Estafa D. Theft
47. When more than three armed persons form a band of robbers for the purpose of committing robbery in the
highway, the felony committed is:
A. Brigandage C. Piracy
B. Robbery D. None of these
48. To be liable for violation of the Anti-Fencing law of 1979 (PD No. 1612), a person who, with intent to gain for
himself or another, shall buy, receive, possess, keep, acquire, conceal, sell, or dispose of, or shall buy and sell,
any item, article, object which he knows, or should be known to him, to have been derived from the proceeds of
the crime of:
A. Robbery or Theft C. Theft only
B. Robbery only D. Robbery, Theft, or Estafa
49. A person who shall contract a second or subsequent marriage before the former marriage has been legally
dissolved is liable for what crime?
A. Adultery C. Bigamy
B. Concubinage D. None of these
50. HERCULES kidnapped ACHILLES and subsequently detained him in a rented property somewhere in
Valenzuela City. After detaining ACHILLES for 10 hours, HERCULES called ACHILLES’ wife to ask for the payment
of P2 million in exchange for the liberty of her husband. ACHILLES’ wife immediately agreed and deposited the
P2 million in HERCULES’ bank account. Five hours have passed before HERCULES was able to receive the money.
Thereafter, he quickly released ACHILLES. What crime is committed?
A. Slight illegal detention C. Kidnapping and serious illegal detention
B. Grave coercion D. Forcible abduction
51. It is the taking, with intent to gain, of a motor vehicle belonging to another without the latter’s consent, or
by means of violence against or intimidation of persons, or by using force upon things
A. Robbery C. Carnapping
B. Qualified theft D. Brigandage
52. IVAN entered the house of DIEGO through the chimney, just like what Santa Claus does. While inside, he
took a laptop computer on the table and immediately left the house without anyone seeing him. What crime, if
any, did IVAN commit?
A. Robbery C. Theft
B. Trespass to dwelling D. Malicious mischief
53. It is a crime committed by any married woman who shall have sexual intercourse with a man not her
husband and by the man who has carnal knowledge of her, knowing her to be married.
A. Concubinage C. Seduction
B. Bigamy D. Adultery
54. DENNIS and CARMEN were legally separated. Their child FRANCIS, a minor was placed in the custody of
CARMEN, subject to monthly visitations by DENNIS. On one occasion, when DENNIS had FRANCIS in his
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 219
company, DENNIS decided not to return FRANCIS to his mother. Instead, DENNIS took FRANCIS with him to
Spain where he intended for them to reside permanently. What crime, if any, did DENNIS commit?
A. Kidnapping and serious illegal detention C. Kidnapping and failure to return a minor
B. Kidnapping and slight illegal detention D. Corruption of minors
56. Which of the following is no longer a crime/s, according to the decision of the Supreme Court in Valenzuela
vs People (GR No. 160188, June 21, 2007):
A. Frustrated theft c. Both a and b
B. Frustrated robbery d. None of these
57. If someone was killed in the course of the commission of robbery, the crime committed is:
A. Robbery and homicide C. Homicide
B. Robbery D. Robbery with homicide
58. A person who, by means of violence, shall seize anything belonging to his debtor for the purpose of applying
the same to the payment of the debt is liable for what felony?
A. light threats C. Light coercions
B. Fraudulent insolvency D. None of these
59. By using a slingshot, RONNIE deliberately hit the favorite duck of his LOLA TASYA. As a consequence, the
duck died. RONNIE was charged with malicious mischief. RONNIE contended that he is exempt from criminal
liability pursuant to Art.332 of the Revised Penal Code. Is RONNIE correct?
A.Yes, because RONNIE is a descendant of his LOLA, thus exempt under Art. 332 of the Penal
Code
B. Yes, because RONNIE is a minor
C. No, because RONNIE committed a crime
D. No, because RONNIE intended to kill the duck of his LOLA
62. JOAN and JANE are college classmates. They are both of legal age. JOAN burned the pen of JANE worth
P10.00 because JANE did not allow JOAN to copy her assignment in school. What crime, if any, did JOAN
commit?
A. Malicious mischief C. Unjust vexation
B. Arson D. No crime was committed
66. DONDON, a tricycle driver, plied his usual route using a Suzuki motorcycle with a sidecar. One evening, JOJO
rode on the sidecar, poked a knife at DONDON and instructed him to go near the bridge. Upon reaching the
bridge, JOJO alighted from the motorcycle and suddenly stabbed DONDON several times until he was dead.
JOJO fled from the scene taking the motorcycle with him. What crime/s did JOJO commit?
A. Homicide C. Carnapping with homicide
B. Carnapping and murder D. Carnapping and homicide
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 220
67. At about 11:00 in the evening, LANDO forced his way inside the house of ROGER. TIBURCIO, ROGER’s son,
saw LANDO and accosted him. LANDO pulled a knife and stabbed TIBURCIO on his abdomen. ROGER heard the
commotion and went out of his room. LANDO, who is about to escape, assaulted ROGER. TIBURCIO suffered
injuries, which were not for the timely medical attendance, would have caused his death. ROGER sustained
injuries that incapacitated him for 25 days. How many crime/s did LANDO commit?
A. 1 C. 3
B. 2 D. 4
68. In question no. 67, what kind of physical injuries did ROGER sustain?
A. Serious physical injuries C. Slight physical injuries
B. Less serious physical injuries D. Mutilation
69. In the crime of qualified seduction, the offended party should be a virgin. What kind of virginity does the law
contemplate?
A. Physical virginity C. Both a and b
B. Moral virginity D. None of these
71. NOAH proposed to his friend MARLON to kidnap ALLIE so that they can rape her. MARLON agreed. On the
date of their plan, the two had a change of heart and did not push through with the scheme. What crime, if any,
did NOAH and MARLON commit?
A. Attempted kidnapping C. Attempted rape
B. Attempted forcible abduction D. No crime was committed
73. After raping the complainant in her house, the accused struck a match to smoke a cigarette before departing
from the scene. The brief light from the match allowed him to notice a watch in her wrist. He demanded that she
hand over the watch. When she refused, he forcibly grabbed it from her. What crime/s did the accused commit?
A. Robbery with rape C. Rape and theft
B. Rape and robbery D. Qualified rape
74. An accused charged with violation of PD No. 1612 (Anti-fencing law of 1979) would have been
an____________ in theft or robbery had not the charge filed against him been fencing.
A. Principal C. Accessory
B. Accomplice D. None of these
78. PD No. 533, otherwise known as the Anti-cattle rustling law of 1974 is:
A. Part of the Revised Penal Code C. Either a or b
B. A special penal law D. None of these
79. It is the taking of personal property out of the possession of the owner
A. Robbery C. Asportation
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 221
B. Seizure D. None of these
80. If a person enters the dwelling or property of another without the consent of the owner, but the purpose of
such entry is to render some aid to humanity or justice, what crime, if any, did the person who entered
commit?
A. Trespass to dwelling C. Violation of domicile
B. Trespass to property D. No crime was committed
81. TT kidnapped KK in a dimly lit street. XX, a passerby saw what happened. TT noticed that XX witnessed his
act. As a consequence, TT killed XX. What is the crime committed?
A. Kidnapping with homicide C. Kidnapping and murder
B. Kidnapping and homicide D. None of these
82. A 7-year old child was raped by the friend of her father. What crime is committed?
A. Qualified rape C. Simple rape
B. Rape by sexual assault D. Seduction
83. By using a picklock, ABET ALINLANGAN successfully entered the house of POPOY. As ABET was about to
get the ipad and iphone on top of the table, he noticed POPOY descending from the stairs. Alarmed, he
went to POPOY and killed him. What is the crime committed?
A. Attempted robbery with homicide c. Attempted theft with homicide
B. Attempted robbery and homicide d. Attempted theft and homicide
84. What is the effect if the offender marries the offended party in rape, granting all the requisites for a valid
marriage are present?
A. The crime is extinguished C. both A and B
B. The criminal liability is extinguished D. No effect
85. DOY, a gigolo from Manila raped SISA, a barrio lass in Nueva Ecija. At the time of the commission of the
rape, DOY had no knowledge that SISA was a mental retardate. What is the crime committed?
A. Simple rape C. Sexual assault
B. Qualified rape D. Seduaction
86. AUBREY, a gorgeous ‘colegiala’ but a shoplifter went to SM Valenzuela and proceeded to the women’s wear
section. The saleslady was of the impression that she brought to the fitting room three (3) pieces of
swimsuits of different colors. When she came out of the fitting room, she returned only two (2) pieces to
the clothes rack. The saleslady became suspicious and alerted the store security. AUBREY was stopped by
the security before she could leave the store and brought to the office of the store manager. The security
and the manager searched her and found her wearing the third swimsuit under her blouse and pants.
What is the crime committed?
A. Attempted theft C. Consummated theft
B. Frustrated theft D. Robbery
87. The main difference between kidnapping and forcible abduction is the presence or absence of:
A. Taking of a person C. detention
B. Lewd design D. None of these
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 222
92. SIMPLICIO is married to the sister of DOLLY, and the three (3) live together in a house located in Malabon
City. On several occasions, DOLLY’s dog would bark at SIMPLICIO every time he arrives at past midnight.
One time, after arriving in the house at around 2 o’ clock in the morning, DOLLY’s dog barked
continuously at SIMPLICIO. In a fit of anger, SIMPLICIO entered the house, took a bolo and killed the
dog. What is the crime committed?
A. Malicious mischief C. Mutilation
B. Unjust vexation D. None of these
95. JERRY set the house of RAMONA on fire by way of revenge against the latter. JERRY did not know that
RAMONA was inside. RAMONA died because of the fire. What crime or crimes did JERRY commit?
A. Arson C. Arson with homicide
B. Homicide D. Arson and homicide
96. In question no. 95, suppose JERRY knew that RAMONA was inside, what crime/crimes did JERRY commit?
A. Homicide C. Arson and murder
B. Murder D. Arson and homicide
97. In question no. 95, suppose before setting it on fire, JERRY entered the house and killed RAMONA. Then
JERRY set the house on fire to hide the body of RAMONA. What crime/crimes did JERRY commit?
A. Murder C. Arson with homicide
B. Arson D. Murder and arson
100. It is a law that defines crimes, treats of their nature and provides for their punishment?
A. Criminal law C. Special penal law
B. Criminal jurisprudence D. Civil law
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 223
1. It is a provisional remedy issued upon an order of the court where an action is pending to be levied
upon the
property of the defendant, the same can be held thereafter by the sheriff as security for the
satisfaction of whatever
judgment might be secured in said action by the attaching creditor against the defendant.
A. Preliminary Injunction C. Preliminary Attachment
B. Motion for Prohibition D. Judgment
2. The provision remedies, in so far as there are applicable, may be availed of in connection with the
civil action
deemed instituted in _________________ .
A. Civil Case C. Administrative Action
B. Criminal Action D. Remedial Action
3. When the civil action is properly instituted in the criminal action, the offended party may have the
property of the
accused attached as security for the satisfaction of any judgment that may be recovered from the
accused in the
following cases:
A. When the accused is about to leave from the Philippines
B. When the accused has concealed, removed or disposed of his property or is about to do
so.
C. When the accused is out on bail.
D. When the criminal action is based on a claim for money or property embezzled or
fraudulently misapplied
or converted to the use of the accused who is a public officer, officer of a corporation,
attorney de facto,
broker or agent or clerk in the course of his employment as such.
4. This doctrine means that an unlawful search taints not only the evidence obtained there at but also
facts discovered
by reason of unlawful search.
A. Proof beyond reasonable doubt. C. Fruits of the poisonous tree.
B. Burden of proof D. Border Search
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 224
5. This rule commands that evidence obtained by an unreasonable search and seizure is excluded
from evidence.
A. Consented warrantless Search C. Exclusionary Rule
B. Stop and frisk on Terry search. D. Inspection Search
6. The filing of the petition for __________is considered a waiver of the accused’s right to appeal,
makes his
conviction final the moment he files said application.
A. New Trial C. Motion for Reconsideration
B. Probation D. Appeal
7. It is a ground for new trial except:
A. Error of Law
B. Irregularities prejudicial to the substantial rights of the accused have been committed
during the trial.
C. Failure to conduct preliminary Investigation
D. Newly discovered evidence has been discovered which accused could not with
reasonable diligent have
discovered and produced at the trial and submitted would probably changed the judgment.
8. It is a motion which can interrupt the running of the fifteen (15) day period to perfect an appeal.
A. Motion for new trial C. Motion for Reconsideration
B. Motion in Quash D. Motion for probation
9. How long is given to the accused to make his appeal before the judgment will become final and
executor?
A. 30 days C. 15 days
B. 45 days D. 20 days
10. Who may appeal?
A. Only the accused C. Any party
B. Only the complainant D. The prosecutor
11. In cases divided by the Metropolitan Trial Court, where should the appeal be filed?
A. To the court of Appeals C. To the Supreme Court
B. To the Regional Trial Court D. To the Municipal Trial Court
12. It is a ground for new trial except:
A. Errors of law
B. Irregularities prejudicial to the substantial rights of the accused have been committed
during the trial.
C. New and material evidence has been discovered which the accused could not with
reasonable diligence
have discovered and produced at the trial and which if introduced and admitted would
probably change the
judgment
D. minority of the accused
13. It may be granted by the court where the incompetency of the counsel for the defense is so great
that the defendant was
prejudicial and prevented from fairly presenting his defense.
A. New Trial C. Dismissal of the case
B. Reconsideration D. Judgment
14. Requisites of newly discovered evidence to be a valid ground for new trial, except:
A. The evidence was discovered after the trial
B. Such evidence could not have been discovered and produced at the trial even with
existence of reasonable diligence.
C. The evidence violates the Principle of Double Jeopardy.
D. The evidence must go to the merits and not rest on merely a technical defense.
15. It is a motion which may be filed after judgment but within period for perfecting an appeal.
A. Motion for reconsideration C. Motion for new trial
B. Motion to Quash D. Motion to file an appeal
16. It is a motion which may be presented only after either or both parties have formally offered and
closed their evidence, but
before judgment.
A. Motion to re-open trial C. Motion for reconsideration
B. Motion to file an appeal D. Motion to Quash
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 225
17. In all cases, when the court grants new trial, what happens to the original judgment?
A. The judgment is set aside or vacated C. The judgment become final and executory
B. The judgment is retained D. The judgment may be appealed
18. When a new trial is granted on the ground of newly discovered evidence, what happen to the
original evidence already
presented?
A. The evidence already presented remains C. The evidence already presented
will be set aside
B. The evidence already presented will be discard D. The evidence already presented
will not be given weight.
19. When criminal actions are brought to the Court of Appeals or to the supreme court, who must
represent the people of the
Philippines.
A. Public of the Philippines
B. The private prosecutor with the conformity of the Assistant Provincial Prosecutor
C. The judge
D. The Solicitor General
20. In cases decided by the Metropolitan Trial Court, Where should the appeal be filed?
A. Regional Trial Court C. To the Supreme Court
B. To the Court of Appeals D. to the Municipal Circuit Court
21. In cases decided by the court of Appeal where should the appeal be filed.
A. To the Supreme Court C. To the Solicitor General
B. To the Sandigan Bayan D. To the Court of Appeals itself
22. If the criminal case is dismissed by the court, or there is acquittal, can the complainant or the
offended party make an appeal.
A. No, because it is only the accused who can appeal in case of conviction.
B. No, the offended party or complainant cannot appeal the criminal aspect of the case.
C. Yes,the complainant or offended party may appeal the civil aspect of the case only.
D. Yes, the complainant and the accused are both given by law the right to appeal either
the criminal aspect or civil
aspect of the case.
23. What is the remedy of the accused in case a final judgment of conviction was rendered by the
court?
A. File an appeal C. File a motion to Quash the information
B. File a motion to set aside judgment D. File a motion for new trial
24. Who may appeal from a judgment or final order of the court?
A. Prosecution only C. Any Party
B. Defense only D. The judge
25. For purposes of determining appellate jurisdiction in criminal cases is the __________of the
penalty is taken account
A. Minimum of the penalty C. Maximum of the penalty
B. Medium of the penalty D. None of the above
26. When can a final judgment becomes final?
A. Upon the expiration of the period to appeal therefrom if no appeal has been duly
perfected.
B. Upon the expiration of the period of 30 days
C. Upon the expiration of the period of 10 days
D. Upon the expiration of the period of 20 days
27. Pedro was sentence to suffer five years imprisonment by final judgment. Before the period of
appeal lapsed, Pedro escaped.
Can he appeal his case?
A. Yes, because his right to appeal is provided in our constitution
B. Yes, because he opted to file an appeal because the period of appeal had not yet lapses
C. No, because he escaped; hence, he waived his right to appeal
D. Yes, his right to appeal is mandatory right.
28. The appeal to the Court of Appeal in cases decided by the Regional Trial Court in the exercise of
its appellate jurisdiction shall
be by ____________
A. Petition by Motion for Reconsideration C. Petition to re-open the trial
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 226
B. Petition for new trial D. Petition for review
29. How should be the service of the notice of appeal be secured if it cannot be made upon the
adverse party or his counsel.
A. By e-mail service C. By registered mail service
B. By telephone service D. By telegraph service
30. When is an appeal be taken?
A. Within fifteen (15) days from promulgation of the judgment
B. Within five (5) days from promulgation of the judgment
C. Within Thirty (30) days from promulgation of the judgment
D. Within twenty (20) days from promulgation of the judgment
31. Pedro is the complainant against Berto in a criminal case. Berto was convicted and the judgment
was promulgated. Before the
judgment became final the complainant filed an appeal. Does Pedro have the right to appeal in a
criminal case.
A. No, only the accused/convicted accused can appeal
B. Yes, the complainant can appeal on the civil aspect only of the case.
C. No, because he is the complainant, not the accused.
D. No, because such appeal made by the complainant will place the accused in double
jeopardy.
32. Mario was convicted on the complaint of Noel for homicide. Mario was sentenced to four years
and six months and one day.
Noel the complainant appealed on the ground that the penalty imposed was not proper. And
Noel prayed that it be
increased.Was the appeal of Mario Proper?
A. Yes, because he has also the right to appeal even if he is the complainant.
B. Yes, because the penalty imposed is really not proper.
C. No, the appeal of Noel would constitute a violation on the right of the accused for it will
fall under Double jeopardy.
D. Yes, because under the law, Rule 122, Sec.1, provides that any party may appeal from
a judgment or final order.
33. John was convicted by final judgment for the crime of murder. He was sentenced with an
imprisonment of Reclusion
Perpetua. He did not appeal. The judgment became final and executor. The Supreme Court by
its own power (motu propio)
reviewed the judgment. Is the Supreme Court correct?
A. No, because John did not appeal his judgment
B. No, because the proper person in interest (John) no longer wants to appeal his case.
C. Yes, the Supreme Court has the power to review judgment with maximum penalty of
Reclusion Perpetua,
automatically.
D. No, it is only the accused who can appeal his case.
34. When may the period for perfecting an appeal shall be suspended?
A. From the time a motion to re-open the trial is filed
B. From the time a motion for reconsideration is filed
C. From a time a motion to Quash the information is filed.
D. From the time a motion to dismiss is filed.
35. The world “Promulgation” refers to ___________.
A. Case Record C. Order
B. Judgment D. Trial
36. The word “ Notice” refers to ___________.
A. Judgment C. Trial
B. Case Record D. Order
37. Within how many days should the clerk of court with whom the notice of appeal was filed must
transmit to the clerk of court
of the appellate court the complete record of the case together with the said notice.
A. Ten days C. Five days
B. Fifteen days D. Twelve days
38. In all cases where the death penalty is imposed by the Trial Court, the records shall be forwarded
to the court of appeals for
automatic review within how many days from the promulgation of the judgment.
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 227
A. Within fifteen days but not earlier than ten days from the promulgation of the judgment
or notice of denial of a motion
for new trial or reconsideration.
B. Within twenty days but not earlier than fifteen days from the promulgation of the
judgment or notice of denial of a
motion for new trial or reconsideration.
C. Within ten days but not earlier than seven days from the promulgation of the judgment
or notice of denial of a
motion for new trial or reconsideration
D. Within seven days but not earlier than five days from the promulgation of the judgment
or notice of denial of a
motion for new trial or reconsideration
39. Juanito was convicted by the trial court. A Counsel de Oficio was appointed to him by the court
for his appeal since he is
confined in prison. To cut short the proceedings of appeal,the counsel de oficio of Juanito
withdraw the appeal. Is the action
of the consel de oficio proper?
A. Yes, because the counsel de oficio wishes to cut short the proceedings of the appeal
since he is not being paid by
Juanito.
B. Yes, because it is his right (counsel de oficio) to terminate the appeal at any time even
without the consent of Juanito.
C. No, he (counsel de oficio) cannot withdraw the appeal without the consent of Juanito.
D. Yes, considering that it was not Juanito who choose him (counsel de oficio) to be his
lawyer for his (Juanitos’) appeal.
40. There is a uniform procedure in the Municipal Trial Courts except:
A. In the municipal circuit trial court’s C. Municipal trial courts in cities
B. Metropolitan Trial Courts D. In criminal cases governed by the revised
Rules on summary procedures.
41. In all criminal cases appealed to the Court of Appeals the property appealing the case shall be
called the _______________
A. Complainant C. Appellee
B. Appellant D. Respondent
42. The adverse party of the aprty appealing the case is called the ______________
A. Appellant C. Plaintiff
B. Accused D. Appellee
43. The court of appeals may dismiss the appeal on the following ground except:
A. If appellant escapes from prison C. If appellant jumps bail
B. If appellant escapes from confinement D. If appellant files a motion for
reconsideration
44. It is one of the scope of judgment of the Court of Appeals except:
A. Reverse the judgment imposed by the trial court.
B. Affirm the judgment imposed by the trial court.
C. Increase or reduce the penalty imposed by the trial court.
D. Forward the case to the Supreme Court.
45. Trials and hearings in the court of appeals must be continuous and must be completed within
such period, unless extended by
the chief justice.
A. Within six (6) months C. Within three (3) months
B. Within ten (10) months D. Within twelve (12) months
46. Arturo was sentenced by the trial court with death penalty when death penalty is still on effect.
There was an automatic
review by the Supreme Court. While the case is still in the Supreme Court, the death penalty
was out lowed. The supreme
Court affirm the decision of the trial court. What should be the proper penalty to be imposed
upon the accused by the
supreme court.
A. Death Penalty C. Reclusion Perpetua
B. Reclusion Temporal D. Prison Correctional
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 228
47. A motion for reconsideration shall be filed within such period from notice of the decision or final
order of the court of Appeals,
with copies thereof served upon the adverse party, setting forth the grounds in support thereof.
A. Within fifteen (15) days C. Within twenty (20) days
B. Within ten (10) days D. Within thirty (30) days
48. Unless otherwise provided by the constitution or by law the procedure in the ____________in
original and in appealed cases
shall be the same as in the Court of Appeals.
A. Regional Trial Court C. Municipal Trial Court
B. Supreme Court D. Municipal Circuit Trial Court
49. The procedure for the review by the supreme court of decisions in criminal cases rendered by the
court of appeals shall be the
same in _____________________
A. Civil Cases C. Corporate cases
B. Administrative cases D. Quash criminal cases
50. When the Supreme Court en banc is equally divided in opinion or the necessary majority cannot
be had on whether to acquit
the appellant, the case shall again be deliberated upon and if no decision is reached after re-
deliberation the judgment of
conviction of the lower court shall be ___________.
51. It is an order in writing issued in the name of the people of the Philippines, signed by a judge and
directed to a peace officer,
commanding him to search for personal property described therein and bring it before the court.
A. Warrant of Arrest C. Information
B. Complaint D. Search Warrant
52. It refers to person and places particularly described thoroughly investigated or searched.
A. Seizure C. Confiscation
B. Search D. Take into custody
53. It refers to things particularly described to be taken away or confiscated or to be seized.
A. Search C. Looking for something
B. Seizure D. Thorough investigation
54. If the criminal action has already been filed where should the application for search warrant be
filed?
A. Any court within whose territorial jurisdiction of a crime was committed.
B. Any court within the judicial region where the crime was committed.
C. Any court within the judicial region where the warrant shall be enforced
D. In the court where the criminal action is pending
55. A search warrant may be issued for the search and seizure for this kind of property.
A. Real Property C. Personal property
B. Paraphernal Property D. Capital property
56. A _________A_________ shall not issue except upon (57)________B__ in connection with one
specific offense to be determined
personally by the (58) ______C______after examination under(59)_____D_________ or
affirmation of the
(60)_________E________ and the witnesses he may produce, and particularly describing the
place to be searched and the things
to be seized.
A. Search warrant C. Judge E.
Complainant
B. Probable cause D. Oath
61. During the arraignment, the accused must be ______________.
A. Represented by a proxy C. Out of the country
B. Present personally D. Represented by the prosecutor
62. What plea is recorded or entered for the accused if he refuses to plead?
A. Plea of guilty C. No plea is entered
B. Plea of not guilty D. Improvident plea of guilty
63. The reading of the complainant or information during the arraignment shall be done in what
dialect or language?
A. In English only C. In Spanish
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 229
B. In Tagalog only D. In the dialect or language known by the
accused
64. Total criminal liability is extinguished except by:
A. By service of sentence C. By prescription of crime
B. By absolute Pardon D. By conditional pardon
65. It is the Loss or waiver of the State of its right to prosecute an act prohibited and punished by law.
A. Prescription of jurisdiction C. Prescription of crime
B. Prescription of venue D. Prescription of penalty
66. It is an accusation in writing charging a person with an offense subscribed by the prosecutor or
fiscal and filled with the court.
A. Arrest C. Complainant
B. Information D. Warrant of Arrest
67. It is a sworn written statement charging a person with an offense, subscribed by the offended
party, any peace officer or other
public officer charged with the enforcement of the law violated.
A. Information C. Complaint
B. Search Warrant D. Warrant of Arrest
68. He shall have the direction and control in the prosecution of all criminal actions either
commenced by complaint or by
Information.
A. Public Prosecutor or fiscal C. Judge
B. Clerk of Court D. Investigator on case
69. It has the power to order a change of venue or place of trial to avoid a miscarriage of justice.
A. Congress C. Supreme Court
B. Court of Appeals D. Senate
70. The proper officer who issues a warrant of arrest.
A. Public Prosecutor C. Judge
B. Chief of Police D. Clerk of Court
71. It is defined as such facts and circumstances which would lead a reasonable discreet and prudent
man to believe that an offense has been committed and that the objects sought in connection with the
offense are in the place sought to be searched.
A. Personal Knowledge C. Probable Cause
B. Proof beyond reasonable doubt D. Principle of innocence
72. Requisites of a valid search warrant except:
A. It must be upon probable cause
B. The search warrant must particularly describe the place to be search and the things to
be seized
C. The search warrant must be issued in connection with the specific offense
D. The search warrant must involved real properties
73. It is a warrant which fails to sufficiently specify the place or person to be searched or things to be
seized.
A. Search Warrant C. Provisionary Search Warrant
B. General Search Warrant D. Probationary Search Warrant
74. The officer, enforcing the search warrant if refused admittance to the place of directed search
after giving notice of his
purpose and authority, what may be his legal; move?
A. May break open any outer or inner door of a house
B. May break open any outer or inner window of a house
C. May liberate himself when unlawfully detained.
D. All of the above
75. How should a search of a house, room, or any other premises be made?
A. Presence of the lawful occupant C. Two witnesses of
sufficient age and discretion
B. Presence of any member of the occupant’s family D. All of the above
76. PO1 Reyes was enforcing a search warrant, he introduced himself to the occupant of the house
and mentioned his purpose,
however he was refuse admittance. What should be the legal move of PO1 Reyes?
A. May break open the door C. May break any part of the house to make
an entry
B. May break open the window D. All of the above
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 230
77. The validity of the search warrant.
A. Ten (10) days from its date C. Seven (7) days from its date
B. Fifteen (15) days from its date D. Five (5) days from its date
78. To whom the officer who served the search warrant return the property seized?
A. To the prosecutor C. To the complainant
B. To the judge who issued the warrant D. To the clerk of court
79. Berto was seen and observed by PO2 Peralta in the act of picking the wallet of Carlos. Berto
successfully took possession of
the wallet of Carlos. At this instance PO2 Peralta arrested Berto and when PO2 Peralta search
Berto a bladed weapon was
found in his possession. Berto was charged with theft and illegal possession of deadly weapon.
He countered that the search
made by PO2 Peralta on his person is illegal. Is Berto correct?
A. Yes, because PO2 Peralta have no search warrant when he searched Berto.
B. Yes, the deadly weapon cannot be used as evidence against Berto because it was
illegally searched.
C. No, because the search made by PO2 Peralta is incidental to a lawful arrest.
D. Yes, because PO2 Peralta abused his authority when he searched Berto without a
warrant.
80. The rule that searches and seizures must be.supported by a valid search is not absolute. The
exception is:
A. Search incidental to a lawful arrest C. Stop and Frisk
B. Plain view seizure D. all of the above E. None of the
above
81. A valid search warrant was issued against Roberto. When the warrant was served on the house
of Roberto, an unlicensed
firearm was found in his room which is not included in the search warrant. He was charged for
illegal possession of
unlicensed firearm. Will the case against Roberto prosper?
A. Yes, because he was in possession of an unlicensed firearm
B. Yes, because seizure of the unlicensed firearm is incidental to a lawful search.
C. No, because the firearm is not one of those personal properties ordered to be seized by
the court, and therefore
illegally obtained evidence.
D. Yes, although it is not included in the search warrant, the firearm which is unlicensed is
illegal and therefore can be
confiscated and seized
82. This doctrine means that an unlawful search taints not only the evidence obtained during the
search but also facts discouraged
by reason of said unlawful search
A. Principle of double jeopardy C. Proof of beyond reasonable doubt
principle
B. Principle of a fruit a Poisonous tree D. Search incidental to a lawful arrest
principle
83. It is defined as the vernacular designation of the right of a police officer to stop a citizen on the
street, interrogate him and put
him for weapons,
A. Stop & Frisk C. Waiver
B. Plain view seizure D. Consented warrantless search
84. This rule commands that evidence obtained by an unreasonable search and seizure is excluded
from evidence.
A. Exclusionary rule C. Plain view doctrine
B. Fruit of a poisonous tree doctrine D. Stop & Frisk Principle
85. In this principle, the law requires that there be fist a lawful arrest before a search can be made.
A. Plain view doctrine C. Search incidental to lawful arrest
B. Stop & Frisk Doctrine D. Inspection search
86. The purpose of search incidental to A lawful arrest, except:
A. Protect the arresting officer against physical harm from the person being arrested
B. The person being arrested might be concealing weapons to be used against the officer
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 231
C. To protect the person arrested from destroying evidence within his reach.
D. To know the identity of the arrested person.
87. The search warrant was issued on February 01, 2012, up to what date will it be valid?
A. Feb 09, 2012 C. Feb 12, 2012
B. February 11,2012 D. February 10,2012
88. The officer after the conduct of search and seizure must do the following except:
A. Give a detailed receipt of the property seized to the lawful occupant.
B. Leave a detailed receipt of the property in the place in which he found the seized
property in the presence of at least
two witnesses of sufficient age and discretion residing in the same locality.
C. Deliver immediately the property seized to the issuing judge together with the true and
duly verified under oath
inventory thereof
D. Deliver immediately the property seized in a bonded warehouse for safekeeping even
without the approval of the
court.
89. The extent of warrantless search may be made on the person of the suspect and immediate
vicinity or surrounding area of the
place of arrest, except:
A. In his room
B. Confined place within the accused’s immediate control
C. In his house situated 150 kmtrs away from the place of arrest
D. Premises of surroundings under his immediate control.
90 Routine inspection are not regarded as violative of an individual’s right against unreasonable
search, except:
A. Where the occupants are subjected to a physical or body search
B. Where the officers flashes a light therein without opening the car’s door
C. Where the inspection of the vehicle is limited to a visual search or visual inspection
D. Where the routine check is conducted in a fixed area
QUESTION 91 TO 100
Blacken A, if both statements are correct; B if the first statement is correct and the second is incorrect;
C if the first statement is incorrect and the second is correct; D if both statements are incorrect:
91. The frisk and search of a person is a permissible precautionary measure to protect the officer
from such person who might be armed with dangerous weapon. Warrantless search or incoming and
outgoing passengers at the arrival and departure areas of an international airport is universally
allowed. A
92. Stop and frisk is limited protective search of outer clothing for weapons. A waiver of an illegal
warrantless also mean a waiver of the inadmissibility of evidence seized during an illegal warrantless
arrest.B
93. Warrantless search incidental to s lawful arrest may be made on the person only of the suspect
and not in the immediate vicinity or surrounding area of the place of arrest. Warrantless search
incidental to a lawful arrest may be made on the premises or surroundings under the persons
immediate control.C
94. Where the search is made pursuant to a lawful arrest, there is always need to obtain a search
warrant. When the accused was caught inflagrante (in the act) there must be a search warrant to
search him and a warrant of arrest for his arrest.D
95. The search warrant is valid for ten days from its date. The warrant must direct that it be served in
the day time unless the affidavit asserts that the property is on the person or in the place ordered to
be searched, in which case a direction may be inserted that it be served at any time of the day or
night.A
96. A search warrant may be issued for the search and seizure of personal property. An application
for search warrant may be filed in any court within which whose territorial jurisdiction a crime was
committed.A
97. Search refers to persons and places particularly described to be searched. A warrant of arrest is
an order in writing issued in the name of the people of the Philippines, signed by the judge and
directed to a place of officer, commanding him to search for personal property described therein and
bring it before the court.B
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 232
98. A motion to re-open trial maybe filed after judgment but within the period for reconsideration can
interrupt the running of the 15 day period to perfect an appeal.C
99. Decisions of cases in the court of appeals is appealable to the Regional Trial Courts. Cases
decided by the regional trial courts are appealable to the Metropolitan Trial Courts.D
100. For the purpose of determining appellate jurisdiction in criminal cases, the maximum of the
penalty and not the minimum is taken into account. The period within which to perfect an appeal is
fifteen (15) days.A
1.
A kind of evidence which shows that a best evidence
existed as to the proof of the fact is in question
A. Real Evidence
B. Secondary Evidence
C. Best Evidence
D. Res gestae
B
B. Composite
C. Continuing
D. compound
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 233
A. All of these
B. Defense
C. Prosecution
D. Clerk of Court
C. inducing a minor
D. kidnapping B
B. falsification
C. Forgery
D. All of these
B. Inheritance
C. Tradition Heritage
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 234
8. What kind of presumption involves the mental
process by which the existence of one fact is
inferred from proof of some other facts?
A. Conclusive
B. of"law
C. Disputable
D. of fact
A. Factum probans
B. Factum probandum
C. Owe probandi
D. Owes probandi
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 235
12. Can a husband testify against the wife in an
adultery case?
A. Res gestae
B. Burden of Evidence
C. Burden of Proof
D. Estoppel
A. attempted estafa
B. frustrated estafa
C. attempted fraud
D. consummated fraud
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 236
15. The probative value or credit given by the court to
a particular evidence
A. Preponderance of evidence
B. Evidentiary fact
C. Ultimate Fact
D. Weight of Evidence
A. Capacity of observation
B. Capacity of recollection
C. Capacity of Knowledge
D. Capacity of communication
A. Primary
B. Real
C. Best
D. Conclusive
A. Fine
B. arresto mayor
C. prison mayor
D. destierro
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 237
19. A detained prisoner is allowed to eat and drink in a
nearby restaurant on several occasions. He is,
however, well-guarded at all times. The warden
allowed him to go out of his cell without any
consideration whatsoever. The warden may be charged
with
A. negligence of duty
B. leniency or laxity
C. dereliction of duty
D. infidelity
A. Cognizance
B. Judicial Admission
C. Judicial Knowledge
D. Judicial Notice
A. Parole Evidence
B. Ante-mortem statement
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 238
B
A. Piracy
B. Felonies
C. Theft
D. Suicide
A. Prospectivity
B. Generality
C. Territoriality
D. Immunity
A. Felony
B. Mala Inse
C. Mala Incest
D. Mala prohibita
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 239
satisfied in order that one or more of those accused
can qualify as state witness?
B. Mistake of facts
D. Mistake in identity
A. French Rule
B. Spanish Rule
C. American Rule
D. English Rule
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 240
30. When the law attaches capital punishment or
afflictive penalties the felony is said to be
A. Grave
B. Light
C. Less grave
D. Serious
A. Grave
B. Light
C. Less grave
D. Serious
A. abuse of confidence
C. neglect of elders
D. disrespect of rank
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 241
A. Justifying circumstances
B. Mitigating Circumstance
C. Exempting circumstances
D. Aggravating circumstances
A. 3 Y E A R S
B. S I X Y E A R S
C. 6 M O N T H S I M P R I S O N M E N T
D. 4 Y E A R S A N D 2 M O N T H S
C
A. Generic
B. Specific
C. Qualifying
D. Inherent
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 242
principally participated therein, takes part
subsequent to the commission, either in profiting by
the effects of the crime or by concealing or
destroying the body of the crime?
A. W I T N E S S E S
B. A C C E S S O R I E S
C. P R I N C I P A L S
D. A C C O M P L I C E S
B
A. Generic
B. Specific
C. Qualifying
D. Inherent
A. T R E A C H E R Y
B. N I G H T T I M E
C. I G N O M I N Y
D. T A K I N G A D V A N T A G E O F S U P E R I O R S T R E N G T H
A
A. M A L A P R O H I B I T A
B. F E L O N I E S
C. V I O L A T I O N O F O R D I N A N C E
D. M A L A I N S E
B
A. S I L V E R P L A T T E R
B. E X C L U S I O N A R Y D O C T R I N E
C. F R U I T O F T H E P O I S O N O U S T R E E
D. M I R A N D A R U L I N G
A
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 243
eventually got married. When Mr. Santos returned to
the Philippines his wife, Alona filed an action
against him for violating their marriage. What is
the liability of Mr. Santos, if any?
A. N O N E O F T H E S E
B. A D U L T E R Y
C. C O N C U B I N A G E
D. B I G A M Y
D
A. D E L I V E R I N G P R I S O N E R S F R O M J A I L S
B. E V A S I O N T H R O U G H N E G L I G E N C E
C. R E C K L E S S I M P R U D E N C E
D. C O N N I V I N G W I T H O R C O N S E N T I N G T O E V A S I O N
B
A. E S T A F A
B. A L L O F T H E S E
C. F A L S I F I C A T I O N
D. F O R G E R Y
B
A. recidivist
B. habitual Delinquent
C. delinquent
D. quasi-recidvist
A. E V I D E N C E
B. P R O C E D U R E
C. I N V E S T I G A T I O N
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 244
D. T R I A L
A
A. Group
B. Band
C. Brigands
D. Team
A. R E S NULLUS
B. R E S IPSA LOQUITUR
C. R E S JUDICATA
D. R E S GESTAE
D
A. I S L I A B L E F O R M U R D E R
B. I S A N A C C E S S O R Y T O T H E C R I M E
C. I S A C O N S P I R A T O R
D. I N C U R S N O C R I M I N A L L I A B I L I T Y
C
A. M I S T A K E N I D E N T I T Y
B. M I S T A K E I N T H E B L O W
C. R E S U L T S A R E L E S S T H A N I N T E N D E D
D. R E S U L T I S G R E A T E R T H A N I N T E N D E D
A
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 245
A. O R A L D E F A M A T I O N
B. B L A C K M A I L
C. S L A N D E R
D. I N C R I M I N A T O R Y M A C H I N A T I O N S
D
A. P H Y S I C A L I N J U R I E S
B. A T T E M P T E D F E L O N Y
C. F R U S T R A T E D F E L O N Y
D. N O C R I M I N A L L I A B I L I T Y
C
A. Treason
C. Espionage
D. Levying war
A. W A R R A N T O F A R R E S T
B. S E A R C H W A R R A N T
C. S U B P O E N A
D. S U M M O N S
B
A. Aid or comfort
C. Levying war
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 246
57. Under the new Constitution, who is empowered to
order or change the venue or place of trial in order
to avoid miscarriage of justice?
A. E X E C U T I V E J U D G E
B. S U P R E M E C O U R T
C. R E G I O N A L T R I A L C O U R T S
D. R E G I O N A L S T A T E P R O S E C U T O R
B
A. S E C O N D A R Y E V I D E N C E
B. P A R O L E E V I D E N C E
C. C O R O L L A R Y E V I D E N C E
D. B E S T E V I D E N C E
A
A. P A R D O N
B. A M N E S T Y
C. R E P R I E V E
D. P E N A L T Y
A
A. Treason
C. Espionage
D. Misprision of Treason
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 247
A. C O M P O S I T E
B. C O M P O U N D
C. C O N T I N U I N G
D. C O M P L E X
C
A. W H E N I T C H A N G E S T H E B U R D E N O F P R O O F
B. W H E N E V I D E N C E F O R T H E P R O S E C U T I O N I S S T R O N G
C. W H E R E N O P O S I T I V E A N D P R O P E R I D E N T I F I C A T I O N HAS BEEN
SATISFACTORILY MADE
D. W H E N Q U E S T I O N S O N WHETHER OR NOT ACCUSED COMMITTED THE
OFFENSE IS CLEAR
B
A. Mutiny
B. Piracy
C. Espionage
D. Sedition
A. M I R A N D A RULE
B. R U L E O F FACILITATION
C. R U L E O F INTERVENTION
D. R U L E O F RESERVATION
A
A. Mutiny
B. Piracy
C. Espionage
D. Sedition
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 248
66. What kind of motion may be availed of anytime before
arraignment?
A. M O T I O N TO DISMISS
B. M O T I O N FOR REVIEW
C. M O T I O N FOR RECONSIDERATION
D. M O T I O N TO QUASH
C
A. R E C I D I V I S M
B. I N S A N I T Y
C. T R E A C H E R Y
D. I N T O X I C A T I O N
C
A. A C T W I T H D I S C E R N M E N T
B. A C T C A R E L E S S L Y O R N E G L I G E N T L Y
C. S H O W C R I M I N A L I N T E N T
D. S H O W M A L I C E
A
A. P O L I C E M A N
B. MMDA E N F O R C E R
C. B A R A N G A Y C A P T A I N
D. B A R A N G A Y T A N O D
A
A. C A P I T A L P U N I S H M E N T
B. C O M P L E X C R I M E
C. C O N T I N U O U S O F F E N S E
D. C I V I L I N T E R D I C T I O N
A
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 249
office and was published by someone. The authorities
got hold of the obscene magazine. A is
A. N O T L I A B L E A T A L L
B. L I A B L E F O R O B S C E N E P U B L I C A T I O N ( A S C O - P U B L I S H E R )
C. L I A B L E F O R P O R N O G R A P H Y
D. liable for the obscene publications (as author)
A. C O U R T M U S T C A U S E T H E T R U E N A M E T O B E I N S E R T E D
B. W H A T I S P I V O T A L I S T H E N A M E A N D D E S C R I P T I O N OF THE
OFFENDER
C. T H E P O L I C E M U S T L A B E L T H E P R O P E R T Y I N A W A Y T H A T W I L L
DISTINGUISH IT FROM OTHERS
D. D E S C R I B E THE PROPERTY SUBJECT MATTER WITH SUCH
PARTICULARITY AS TO PROPERLY IDENTIFY, THE PARTICULAR
OFFENSE CHARGED
D
A. P E R S O N A L L Y , I N O P E N C O U R T A N D O F T H E R E C O R D
B. B Y T H E A P P R O V A L O F T H E C O U R T A N D U P O N W R I T T E N R E Q U E S T B Y
THE ACCUSED
C. T H R O U G H C O U N S E L I N O P E N C O U R T A N D O N T H E R E C O R D
D. P E R S O N A L L Y B Y W R I T T E N M O T I O N
B
A. S L I G H T P H Y S I C A L I N J U R Y
B. S E R I O U S P H Y S I C A L I N J U R I E S
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 250
C. I L L T R E A T M E N T
D. L E S S S E R I O U S P H Y S I C A L I N J U R Y
B
A. W H E T H E R O R N O T A W A S D R U N K A T T H E T I M E
B. T H E B A R A N G A Y C O U R T H A S N O J U R I S D I C T I O N O V E R T H E C A S E
C. W H E T H E R O R N O T B W A S A L S O D R U N K
D. None of the above
A. M I T I G A T I N G C I R C U M S T A N C E
B. A G G R A V A T I N G C I R C U M S T A N C E
C. E X E M P T I N G C I R C U M S T A N C E
D. A L T E R N A T I V E C I R C U M S T A N C E
D
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 251
A. C I R C U M S T A N T I A L
B. C O R R O B O R A T I V E
C. H E A R S A Y
D. D I R E C T
C
A. P A R R I C I D E
B. G R A V E T H R E A T S
C. H O M I C I D E
D. M U R D E R
A
A. C O M M O N R E P U T A T I O N
B. R E S G E S T A E
a. dying declaration
A. B’ S D E A T H I S I N D I S P E N S A B L E
B. T H E D E C L A R A T I O N W A S N O T W R I T T E N
C. N O M E N T I O N W A S M A D E T H A T B’ S W O U N D W A S F A T A L
D. B H A S A G R U D G E A G A I N S T A
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 252
82. A’s statement is inadmissible in evidence against
him because
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 253
A
D. None of these
B. August 1, 1983
C. January 1, 1983
D. December 1, 1980
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 254
B. law enforced at the time of trial
88. Criminal procedure is a
A. substantive law
B. constitutional law
C. administrative law
A. criminal investigation
B. pre-trial conference
C. preliminary investigation
A. None of these
B. Custody
C. Detention or imprisonment
D. Investigation
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 255
C. after the lapse of the period for the police to
execute the same
D. all of these
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 256
C
A. Arbitration
B. Confrontation
C. Compromise
D. Mediation/conciliation
A. criminal jurisprudence
B. criminal jurisdiction
C. criminal procedure
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 257
C. court where the suspects reside
A. court interpreter
B. clerk of court
C. legal researcher
A. RA No 7691
B. RA No 8493
C. RA No 7438
D. RA No 7659
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 258
3. Charlie and Lea had been married for more than six months.
They live together with the children of Lea from her first
husband. Charlie had sexual relationship with Jane, the 14
year old daughter of Lea. Jane loves Charlie very much.
What was the crime committed by Charlie, if any?
A. Simple Seduction
B. Qualified Seduction
C. Consented Abduction
D. Rape - B
5. A warrant of arrest was issued against Fred for the killing of
his parents. When PO2 Tapang tried to arrest him, Fred gave
him 1 million pesos to set him free. PO2 Tapang refrained in
arresting Fred. What was the crime committed by PO2 Tapang?
A. Indirect Bribery
B. Direct Bribery
C. Corruption of Public Officials
D. Qualified Bribery - D
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 259
9. The authority of the court to take cognisance of the case in
the first instance.
A. Appellate Jurisdiction
B. General Jurisdiction
C. Original Jurisdiction
D. Exclusive Jurisdiction - C
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 260
C. gang members
D. vagrants - D
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 261
24. A kind of executive clemency whereby the execution of penalty
is suspended.
A. Pardon
B. commutation
C. amnesty
D. reprieve - D
31. Ways and means are employed for the purpose of trapping and
capturing the law breaker in the execution of his criminal
plan.
A. Misfeasance
B. entrapment
C. inducement
D. instigation - B
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 262
32. Those where the act committed is a crime but for reasons of
public policy and sentiment there is no penalty imposed.
A. impossible crimes
B. aggravating circumstances
C. absolutory causes
D. complex crimes - C
35. At what time may the accused move to quash the complaint or
information?
A. at any time before his arrest
B. only after entering his plea
C. any time before entering his plea
D. Monday morning - C
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 263
proper penalty and civil liability provided for by law on the
accused.
A. trial
B. Pre-trial
C. Arraignment
D. Judgment - D
41. It is evidence of the same kind and to the same state of facts.
A. secondary evidence
B. prima facie evidence
C. corroborative evidence
D. best evidence - C
44. When the witness states that he did not see or know the
occurrence of a fact.
A. positive evidence
B. corroborative evidence
C. secondary evidence
D. negative evidence - D
46. All persons who can perceive and perceiving, can make known
their perception to others.
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 264
A. Suspects
B. witnesses
C. victims
D. informers - B
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 265
C.res ipsa loquitur
D.dura lex sed lex - A
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 266
60. This right of the accused is founded on the principle of
justice and is intended not to protect the guilty but to
prevent as far as human agencies can the conviction of an
innocent person.
A. right to due process of law
B. presumption of innocence
C. right to remain silent
D. right against self-incrimination - B
65. One, who at the time of his trial for one crime shall have been
previously convicted by final judgment of another crime
embraced in the same title of the Revised Penal Code.
A. Recidivism
B. habitual delinquency
C. reiteracion
D. quasi-recidivism - A
66. Alevosia means
A. Craft
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 267
B. treachery
C. evident premeditation
D. cruelty - B
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 268
C. 10 years
D. 40 years - A
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 269
81. In its general sense, it is the raising of commotions or
disturbances in the State.
A. Sedition
B. Rebellion
C. Treason
D. Coup d’ etat - A
88. It means that the resulting injury is greater than that which
is intended.
A. Aberratio ictus
B. Error in personae
C. Dura Lex Sed lex
D. Praeter Intentionem - D
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 270
89. It means mistake in the blow.
A. Aberratio Ictus
B. Error in Personae
C. Dura lex sed lex
D. Praeter Intentionem - A
90. A stage of execution when all the elements necessary for its
execution and accomplishment are present.
A. Attempted
B. Frustrated
C. Consummated
D. Accomplished - C
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 271
97. A legislative act which inflicts punishment without judicial
trial.
A. Bill of Attainder
B. Bill of Rights
C. Ex Post Facto Law
D. Penal Law - A
98. The taking of a person into custody in order that he may be
bound to answer for the commission of an offense.
A. Search
B. Seizure
C. Arrest
D. Detention - C
99. Pedro stole the cow of Juan. What was the crime committed?
A. Robbery
B. Farm Theft
C. Qualified Theft
D. Simple Theft - C
1. In case of the conviction of the accused, who will pay the cost of the proceedings.
A. Relatives of the accused C. The winning party
B. The accused D. The State
2. If the property of the accused is not sufficient for the payment of all the pecuniary liabilities, which
will be given the
first priority to be paid?
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 272
A. The cost of the proceedings C. The indemnification of the consequential
damages
B. the fine D. The reparation of the damaged cause
3. What is the equivalent rate of the subsidiary personal liability if the accused has no property with
which to pay the
fine in the decision of the court.
A. One day of each Ten Pesos C. One day for each Fifteen Pesos
B. One day for each Eight Pesos D. One day for each twenty Pesos
4. If the accused was prosecuted for grave or less grave felony and the principal penalty imposed is
only a fine, how
long shall be the subsidiary imprisonment of the accused.
A. Three (3) months C. Four (4) months
B. Six (6) months D. Five (5) months
5. If the accused was prosecuted for light felonies only, and the principal penalty is only fine, how
long shall be the
subsidiary imprisonment of the accused.
A. Ten (10) days C. Six (6) days
B. Twelve (12) days D. Fifteen (15) days
6. It is a subsidiary personal liability to be suffered by the convict who has no property with which to
meet the fine.
A. Pecuniary penalty C. Subsidiary penalty
B. Administrative penalty D. Correctional penalty
7. What is the accessory penalty of reclusion perpetua and reclusion temporal.
A. Civil interdiction for life C. Suspension of the right of suffrage
B. Suspension of the right to hold office. D. No accessory penalty
8. What is the accessory penalty of Destierro.
A. Civil interdiction for life
B. Suspension from public office, profession or calling
C. Suspension of the right to suffrage
D. No accessory penalty
9. Every penalty imposed for the commission of a felony shall carry with it the ___________ of the
proceeds of the
crime and the instruments or tools with which it was committed.
A. Destruction C. Auction
B. Forfeiture D. Removal
10. The proceeds and instruments or tools of the crime shall be taken in favor of the __________.
A. Victim C. Third party
B. Accused D. Government
11. When can confiscation of the proceeds or property or instruments of the crimes be ordered by the
court.
A. When it submitted in evidence
B. When it is not placed at the disposal of the court
C. When it is owned by the victim
D. When it is owned by the accused
12. Articles which are forfeited, when the order of forfeiture is already final cannot be returned even in
case
of an __________
A. Revival of the case C. Appeal
B. Acquittal D. Refilling of the case
13. The penalty prescribed by law for the commission of a felony shall be imposed upon the _______
in the
commission of the felony.
A. Accessories C. Principals
B. Accomplices D. Co- accused
14. It is the penalty which cannot be imposed when the guilty party is more than seventy years of
age.
A. Reclusion Perpetua C. Death penalty
B. Prison correctional D. Arresto Mayor
15. A single out act constitute two or more grave or less grave felonies is a ____________ crime.
A. Grave offense C. Less grave offense
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 273
B. Complex crime D. Continuing crime
16. In defense of relatives, one of the relatives that can be defended are those relatives by
consanguinity within the
fourth civil degree, such as _____________.
A. Brothers and sisters C. First cousin
B. Uncle and niece D. Second cousin
17. When somebody defended a very distant relative, he is committing ________.
A. Self defense C. Defense of stranger
B. Defense of relative D. Fulfillment of duty
18. A person considered as _________ is exempt in all cases from criminal liability.
A. Insane C. Feebleminded
B. Imbecile D. Epileptic
19. During this lucid interval, an insane person acts with _________.
A. Emotions C. Intelligence
B. Anxiety D. Depression
20. It is the __________ who has the burden of proof to show insanity.
A. Prosecution C. Court
B. Defense D. Prosecutor
21. It is a single crime, consisting of a series of acts but all arising from one criminal resolution.
A. Plural crime C. Habitual crime
B. Continuing crime D. Revolving crime
22. A person shall be deemed to be ________ if within a period of ten years from the date of his
release or last
conviction of the crimes of serious or less serious physical injuries, estafa, or falsification, he is
found guilty of
any of said crimes a third time or oftener.
A. Recidivist C. Ex – convict
B. Habitual delinquent D. Pardonee
23. In imposing fines, the court may fix any amount within the limits established by law; in fixing the
amount in each
case attention shall be given, not only to the mitigating and aggravating circumstances, but
more particularly
to the ________ of the defendant.
A. Education C. Health
B. Wealth and means D. Age
24. Whenever any prisoner shall have served the ________ penalty imposed on him, it shall appear
to the Board
of Indeterminate Sentence that such prisoner is fitted for release, said Board may authorize
the release
of such prisoner on parole, upon such terms and conditions as may be prescribed by the
Board.
A. Medium C. Minimum
B. Maximum D. One half
25. It is the disposition under which a defendant after conviction and sentence is released subject to
conditions imposed by the court and to the supervision of a probation officer.
A. Parole C. Probation
B. Recognition D. Pardon
26. A person placed on probation.
A. Parolee C. Pardonee
B. Probationer D. Ex- convict
27. One who investigate for the court a referral for probation or supervises a probationer or both
A. Parole officer C. Probation officer
B. Police officer D. Administrative officer
28. No penalty shall be executed except by virtue of a _________ judgment.
A. In terim C. De Jure
B. Final D. Temporary
29. When a convict becomes insane or imbecile after final sentence has been pronounced, the
execution of said
sentence is __________ only as regards the personal penalty.
A. Continued C. Extinct
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 274
B. Suspended D. Enforced
30. If the convict becomes insane or imbecile after the final sentence, the payment of his ________
shall not be
suspended.
A. Criminal liability C. Civil or pecuniary liabilities
B. Administrative liability D. Personal liability
31. Whenever a minor or either sex under 18 years of age at the time of the commission of a grave or
less grave
felony, is accused thereof, the court, after hearing the evidence in the proper proceedings,
instead of
pronouncing judgment of conviction, shall ___________ all further proceedings and shall
commit such minor
to the custody and care of a public or private charitable institution.
A. Proceed C. Set aside
B. Suspend D. Prolong
32. If the minor has behaved properly or has complied with the conditions imposed upon him during
his confinement,
in accordance with the provisions of Art. 80 he shall be returned to the ____________ in order
that the same
may order his final release.
A. DSWD C. Court
B. Parents D. Relatives / guardians
33. In case the minor fails to behave properly or to comply with the regulations of the institution to
which he was
committed, or he was found to be incorrigible he shall be returned to the court in order that the
same may
_________ corresponding to the crime committed by him.
A. Render the judgment C. Order extension of his commitment
B. Order his release D. Order his rehabilitation
34. The expenses for the maintenance of the minor delinquent confined in the institution to which he
has been
committed, shall be borne totally or partially by _________ or those persons liable to support
him, if they are
able to do so in the discretion of the court.
A. DSWD C. Institution
B. Parents or relatives D. State
35. Under the new law, the age of majority is ___________.
A. 21 years old C. 18 years old
B. 15 years old D. 16 years old
36. Any person sentenced to ___________ shall not be permitted to enter the place or places
designated in the
sentenced, nor within the radius therein specified.
A. Arresto Mayor C. Destierro
B. Aresto Menor D. Prision Mayor
37. The radius specified in the penalty of destierro shall be _____________.
A. Not less than 25kms. But not more than 200 kms.
B. Not less than 20 kms. But not more than 225 kms.
C. Not less than 5 kms. But not more than 125 kms.
D. Not less than 25 kms. But not more than 250 kms.
38. The penalty of ____________ shall be served in the municipal jail or in the house of the
defendant under the
surveillance of an officer of the law.
A. Arresto Mayor C. Prision correccional
B. Arresto Menor D. Prision Mayor
39. As the personal penalties, criminal liability of the accused is totally extinguished upon his
_________.
A. Incarceration C. Death
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 275
B. Conviction D. Confinement
40. The pecuniary liabilities of the convict is extinguished only when the death of the offender occurs
_______.
A. After the final judgment C. During the pendency of the case
B. Before the final judgment D. During the hearing of the case
41. It is not one of the grounds of extinction of criminal liability of the accused.
A. By voluntary surrender
B. By service of sentence
C. By absolute pardon
D. By prescription of the crime
42. Amado was change with homicide during the pendency of the case Amado died what will happen
to the
Case filed against him.
A. The case will continue to be heared.
B. The case will be suspended.
C. The case will set aside.
D. The case will be dismissed.
43. Berto was sentenced in the regional trial court. He appealed the case to the court of appeals.
During the
pendency of his appeal, Berto died. What will happen to his civil and criminal liability?
A. The civil and criminal liability is not extinguished?
B. The civil and environmental liability is extinguished?
C. The civil and criminal liability will be suspended.
D. The civil and criminal liability is set a side.
44. It is an act of grace proceeding from the power entrusted with the execution of the laws which the
individual
On whom it is bestowed from the punishment the law inflicts for the crime he has committed.
A. Parole C. Prescription of penalty
B. Pardon D. Prescription of crime
45. It is the forfeiture or loss of the right of the state to prosecute the offender after the lapse of a
certain time.
A. prescription of crime C. Parole
B. Prescription of penalty D. Probation
46. It is the loss or forfeiture of the right of the government to execute the final sentence after the
lapse of a certain
Time.
A. Amnesty C. Prescription of penalty
B. Pardon D. Prescription of criminal
47. Crimes punishable by reclusion perpetua or reclusion temporal shall prescribed in _____
A. 10yrs C. 20yrs.
B. 12yrs D. 15yrs.
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 276
offenses punished only by a fine or by imprisonment for not more than one month, or both
prescribed after ______.
A. Four years B. One years
C. Five years D. Eight years
54. The term of prescription shall not run when the offender is _____.
A. Absent from the Phil. Archipelago. B. Under rehabilitation
C. Confined D. Arrested
55. The period of prescription of penalties shall commence to run from the date when the offender
should _____ the
service of this sentence.
A. Start serving C. Commence
B. Evade D. Interrupt
56. It is a change of the decision of the court made by the Chief Executive by reducing the degree of
the penalty
inflicted upon the convict, or by decreasing the length of the imprisonment of the amount of the
fine
A. Reprieve C. Suspension of sentence
B. Commutation of sentence D. Enforcement of sentence
57. It is considered a contract between the sovereign power of the executive and the convict that the
sovereign power
will release convict upon compliance with the condition.
A. Amnesty C. Conditional Pardon
B. Probation D. Reprieve
58. Any person who has been granted conditional pardon shall incurr the obligation of _____
otherwise, his non
compliance shall result in the revocation of the pardon.
A. Strictly complying the condition B. Ignoring the condition
C. Evading the condition D. Questioning the condition
59. It is the prerogative of the Executive to extend this to the offender at any time after the imposition
of the final
judgment.
A. Parole C. Probation
B. Amnesty D. Conditional Pardon
60. It is an Executive clemency given to the convicted offender after the offender has served the
minimum penalty
through the Board of Pardons and Parole.
A. Parole C. Amnesty
B. Pardon D. Probation
61. Every person criminally liable for a felony is also _____ liable.
A. Administratively C. Personally
B. Civily D. Socially
62. It is one of the extinguishment o9f civil liability.
A. Serving of sentence C. Amnesty
B. By compensation D. Parole
63. It is included in civil liability.
A. Restitution C. Indemnification for damages consequential
B. Reparation of the damage caused D. All of the above
64. The civil liability for acts committed by a youthful offender shall be paid by the offenders _____.
A. Parents C. Relative
B. Guardians D. All of the above
65. A prisoner who showed good conduct inside the penal institution shall be allowed a deduction of
his penalty for a
period of _____ for each month of good behavior during the first two years of his imprisonment.
A. Five days C. Eight days
B. Ten days D. Fifteen days
66. During the 3rd to 5th year of his imprisonment the prisoner shall be allowed a deduction of _____
for each month
of good behavior.
A. Fifteen days C. Five days
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 277
B. Eight days D. Ten days
67. During the 6th year until the tenth year, of his imprisonment, the prisoner shall be allowed a
deduction of _____for
each month of good behavior.
A. Eight days C. Ten days
B. Five days D. Fifteen days
68. During the eleventh and successive years of his imprisonment, the prisoner shall be allowed a
deduction of _____ for each month of good behavior.
A. Five days C. Ten days
B. Eight days D. Fifteen days
69. Ana was charged with the crime of adultery together with his boyfriend. Ana, the married woman
after conviction, her husband pardoned her alone is the pardon effective?
A. Yes because she was pardoned by her husband
B. No, the pardon should include the man to be effective.
C. Yes, because it is voluntary given by the husband,
D. No, because pardon can only be given by the Chief Executive
70. When a single act constitute two or more grave or less grave felonies, or when an offense is
necessary means for committing the other, the penalty for _____ shall be imposed in its maximum.
A. The less serious crime C. The most serious crime
B. The light offense D. The most common crime
Questions 71 to 85
Write A if both statements are correct; B if first statement is correct and the second is
incorrect.
C if the first statement is incorrect and the second is correct; D if both statements
are incorrect.
___A_ 71. Subsidiary imprisonment is not an accessory penalty. It is a penalty for it is imposed upon
the accused
and served by him in lieu of the fine which he fails to pay on account of insolvency.
__B__72. One of the pecuniary penalties of the offender is reparation of the damaged caused. The
pecuniary
Liabilities applies only in case the property of the offender is sufficient for the payment of
all his pecuniary
liabilities.
___C__ 73. The subsidiary personal, liability of the offender is at the rate of one day for each ten
pesos. The convict
who served subsidiary penalty may still be required to pay the fine.
___D_ 74. When the court merely imposes a fine, the subsidiary liability shall not exceed one year.
The proceeds of
the crime as well as the tools and instruments shall be forfeited and confiscated in
favor of the victim.
__A_ 75. The confiscation of the proceeds or tools or instruments of the crime can be ordered only if
they are
submitted in evidence or placed at the disposal of the court. Articles which are
forfeited, when the
order of forfeiture is already final, cannot be returned even in case of acquittal.
___B__ 76. The penalty prescribed by law for the commission of a felony shall be imposed upon the
principals in the
commission of such felony. According to Art. 47 of the RPC death penalty may be
imposed when
the guilty person be more than 70 years of age.
___C__ 77. A complex crime is not considered as one crime. One of the kinds of complex crime is
when an offense is
A necessary means for committing another crime.
__D___ 78. A continuing crime is not a single crime consisting of series of acts but all is not arising
from one criminal
resolution. In continuing offense, although there is a series of acts, there are several
crimes committed.
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 278
__A___ 79. Indeterminate Sentence Law is an act which provide for an indeterminate sentence and
parole for all
persons convicted of certain crimes by the courts of the Philippine Island. The act shall
not apply to
persons convicted of offenses punished with death penalty of life imprisonment.
___A__ 80. The court must, instead of single fixed penalty, determine two penalties, referred to in the
Indeterminate
Sentence Act as the Maximum and Minimum terms. Indeterminate Sentence Law does
not apply
to those who are habitual delinquents.
___A_ 81. Probation may be granted whether the sentence imposes a term of imprisonment or a fine
only. The
probation law does not apply to offenders sentenced to serve a maximum of more than
six years.
___A__ 82. If the convict is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not more than one year, the
period of probation
shall not exceed two years. In all other cases, if he is sentenced to more than one year,
said probation
period shall not exceed six years
__B___ 83. Minor delinquents are not confined in a penitentiary to prevent their association with
matured and
hardened criminals. Their confinement in a charitable institution is considered a penalty.
___C__ 84. Art. 80 of the RPC (Suspension of sentence of minors) is applicable only to light
felonies. If a light
felony is committed by a minor, he is not subject to imprisonment, because he is entitled
to a penalty of
one degree lower at least
___B__ 85. The criminal liability is totally extinguished by service of sentence. It is also extinguished
by means of
parole.
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 279
94. In defense of relatives, one of the relatives that can be defended are those relatives by
consanguinity within the
fourth civil degree such as _________________
A. Brothers and sisters C. First cousin
B. Uncle and niece D. Second cousin
95. Relationship by blood refers to relatives by _____________
A. Affinity C. Legislation
B. Consanguinity D. Naturalization
96. A person considered as ___________ is exempt in all cases from criminal liability
A. Insane C. Feebleminded
B. Imbecile D. Epileptic
97. As a rule, ______________ is mitigating in the crimes against property.
A. Intoxication C. Relationship
B. Education D. Sex
98. It is a circumstances present in a crime where it may increase or decrease the criminal liability.
A. Exempting circumstances C. Alternative circumstances
B. Justifying circumstances D. Mitigating circumstances
99. It is a kind of aggravating circumstance that changes the nature of the crime. Example treachery
qualifies the
killing of a person to murder.
A. Qualifying aggravating C. Specific aggravating
B. Generic aggravating D. Inherent aggravating
100. They are persons criminally liable due to their direct participation in the commission of the crime.
A. accessories C. Principals
B. Accomplices D. Co-accomplices
1. What crime is committed when a person, through force, inserts his penis into another person’s mouth or
anal orifice?
A. Simple rape C. Qualified rape
B. Rape by sexual assault D. Acts of Lasciviousness
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 280
2. If a person wounds, assaults or beats another person causing deformity on the latter, the crime
committed is:
A. Serious physical injuries C. Slight physical injuries
B. Less serious physical injuries D. Mutilation
3. What crime is committed when a person, without intent to kill, inflicts upon another any serious physical
injury, by knowingly administering to him any injurious substances or beverages?
A. Serious physical injuries C. Mutilation
B. Less serious physical injuries D. Administering injurious substances or beverages
4. MAGDA, a prostitute, agreed to have sex with a customer for the amount of P1,000.00. While in the
motel, the customer started kissing MAGDA. MAGDA noticed that the customer has bad breath.
Eventually, she pulled away from the customer and refused to have sex with him. Angered by the
refusal, the customer forced himself on MAGDA who was able to accomplish his carnal desires on the
latter. What crime, if any, did the customer commit?
A. Rape C. Acts of lasciviousness
B. Seduction D. No crime was committed
6. NENE, a 10-year old girl, consented to have sex with her 20-year old neighbor HOMER who looks like
John Lloyd Cruz. What crime, if any, did HOMER commit?
A. Simple rape C. Qualified rape
B. Violation of child abuse law D. Qualified Seduction
7. What crime is committed when a police officer takes advantage of his position to rape another person?
A. Simple rape C. Sexual assault
B. Qualified rape D. None of these
8. Any private person who shall enter the dwelling of another against the latter’s will commits the crime of:
A. Qualified trespass to dwelling C. Trespass to property
B. Simple trespass to dwelling D. Violation of domicile
9. Due to the passage of the Anti-rape law of 1997, Rape is now classified as:
A. Crime against chastity C. Crime against liberty
B. Crime against persons D. None of these
10. If the person kidnapped or detained shall be a female, the crime is:
A. Kidnapping and serious illegal detention C. Slavery
B. Slight illegal detention D. Arbitrary detention
11. It is a crime committed by anyone who, under the pretext of reimbursing himself of a debt incurred by
an ascendant, guardian or person entrusted with the custody of a minor, shall, against the latter’s will,
retain him in his service.
A. Slavery C. Exploitation of minors
B. Abandoning a minor D. Exploitation of child labor
12. It is committed by any person who, with intent to gain but without violence against or intimidation of
persons nor force upon things, shall take personal property of another without the latter’s consent
A. Robbery C. Theft
B. Estafa D. Piracy
13. It is a felony committed by any person who shall threaten another with the infliction upon the person,
honor, property of the latter or of his family of any wrong amounting to a crime
A. Grave coercion C. Grave threats
B. Light coercion D. Light threats
14. Any person who shall deliberately cause to the property of another any damage that does not constitute
arson shall be guilty for what crime?
A. Unjust vexation D. Damage to property
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 281
B. Malicious mischief D. None of these
17. LOLO ROMEO fondled the breast of her 15 year-old granddaughter WENDY. WENDY did not resist the
advances of her LOLO and in fact, she stated to him to continue what he is doing. What crime, if any,
did LOLO ROMEO commit?
A. Acts of Lasciviousness C. Seduction
B. Acts of Lasciviousness with the consent D. Attempted Rape
Of the offended party
19. A person who engages in the business of prostitution is liable for what felony?
A. Prostitution C. White slave trade
B. Slavery D. Vagrancy
20. While walking within the premises of a coconut plantation owned by JOEY, ROLAND saw a piece of
coconut on the ground. ROLAND decided to get the coconut and bring it home as a “pasalubong” to his
son. What crime, if any, did ROLAND commit?
A. Simple theft C. Robbery
B. Qualified theft D. Estafa
21. It is the seduction of a woman who is single and of good reputation, over twelve but under eighteen
years of age, and committed by means of deceit
A. Simple seduction C. Forcible abduction
B. Qualified seduction D. Acts of Lasciviousness
22. KURT has a longstanding grudge against his neighbor JIMI. One day, while JIMI was away, KURT
surreptitiously poisoned the cow of JIMI resulting in the death of the cow. What crime, if any, did KURT
commit?
A. Malicious mischief C. Unjust vexation
B. Violation of PD 533 (Anti-cattle rustling law) D. Physical injuries
23. MICHELLE MASIPAG worked as a housemaid and yaya of the one-week old son of the spouses PETER
and PAULA. When MICHELLE learned that her 70 year-old mother was seriously ill, she asked PETER for
a cash advance of P1,000.00, but PETER refused. One morning, MICHELLE gagged the mouth of
PETER’s son with stockings; placed the child in a box; sealed it with masking tape and placed the box in
the attic. Later in the afternoon, she demanded P5,000.00 as ransom for the release of his son. PETER
did not pay the ransom. Subsequently, MICHELLE disappeared.
After a couple of days, PETER discovered the box in the attic with his child already dead. According to
the
autopsy report, the child died of asphyxiation barely three minutes after the box was sealed. What crime/s did
MICHELLE commit?
A. Kidnapping and serious illegal detention C. Kidnapping with homicide
B. Slight illegal detention with homicide D. Kidnapping and homicide
24. Unjust vexation is a:
A. Crime against security C. Crime against chastity
B. Crime against property D. None of these
25. Malicious mischief is a:
A. Crime against property C. Crime against persons
B. Crime against liberty D. None of these
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 282
26. SARAH and NONITO are sweethearts. As a birthday gift, NONITO gave SARAH a BlackBerry cell phone.
Two days later, SARAH broke up with NONITO because she caught the latter cheating on her. SARAH
decided to burn the cell phone that NONITO gave her. What crime, if any, did SARAH commit?
A. Arson C. Damage to property
B. Malicious mischief D. No crime was committed
27. In an interview aired on television, DINA uttered defamatory statements against CARMEN, a successful and
reputable businesswoman. What crime, if any, did DINA commit?
A. Slander C. Incriminating innocent persons
B. Libel D. No crime was committed
28. It consists in voluntarily, but without malice, doing or failing to do an act from which material damage results
by reason of inexcusable lack of precaution on the part of the person performing or failing to perform such act.
A. Reckless imprudence C. Offense
B. Simple imprudence D. None of these
29. It is the abduction of any woman against her will and with lewd designs
A. Consented abduction C. Kidnapping
B. Forcible abduction D. None of these
30. SIMON entered the house of another without employing force or violence upon things. He was seen by a
maid who wanted to scream but was prevented from doing so because SIMON threatened her with a gun.
SIMON then took money and other valuables and left. What crime, if any, did SIMON commit?
31. Seduction is a:
A. Crime against honor C. Crime against chastity
B. Crime against persons D. Crime against liberty
32. Libel is a:
A. Crime against persons C. Crime against chastity
B. Crime against property D. Crime against honor
33. A fire broke out in a department store. SID, taking advantage of the confusion, entered the store and carried
away goods, which he later sold. What crime, if any, did SID commit?
A. Robbery C. Qualified theft
B. Theft D. Estafa
34. Any person who shall defraud another with unfaithfulness or abuse of confidence shall be liable for what
crime?
A. Theft C. Qualified theft
B. Robbery D. Estafa
35. DANTE and DIEGO ate at a restaurant near Our Lady of Fatima University in Valenzuela City. Because it is
lunch time, the restaurant was crowded. Realizing that they can leave the restaurant unnoticed without having
their bill for the food they ate, paid, the two clandestinely left the place. After two days, the police apprehended
the two. What crime, if any, did DANTE and DIEGO commit?
A. Theft C. Estafa
B. Qualfied theft D. No crime was committed
37. It is a crime committed by any person who, in any case other than those authorized by law, or without
reasonable ground therefore, shall arrest or detains another for the purpose of delivering him to the proper
authorities.
A. Arbitrary detention C. Illegal detention
B. Unlawful arrest D. Kidnapping
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 283
38. It is committed by any person who, without authority of law, shall by means of violence, threats or
intimidation, prevent another from doing something not prohibited by law, or compel him to do something
against his will, whether it be right or wrong.
a. Grave coercions c. Light coercions
b. Grave threats d. Light threats
39. Any person who shall orally threaten to do another any harm not constituting a felony is liable for what
crime, if any?
A. Coercion C. Unjust vexation
B. Other light threats D. No crime was committed
40. A private individual who, in order to discover the secrets of another, shall seize his papers or letters and
reveal the contents thereof is liable for what felony?
A. Infidelity in the custody of documents C. Theft
B. Discovering secrets through seizure of D. Estafa
Correspondence
42. To constitute a band under Art. 296 of the Revised Penal Code, there must be how many armed persons
taking part in a robbery?
A. More than three C. Three or more
B. Three D. Less than three
43. A person who possesses a picklock without lawful cause is liable for what crime, if any?
A. Theft C. Fencing
B. Possession of picklocks D. No crime was committed
44. A person who uses a picklock or other similar tools in the commission of robbery shall be guilty of what
crime?
A. Robbery C. Fencing
B. Possession of picklocks D. Robbery and possession of picklocks
45. CAROL and CINDY are sisters. Both are college students in the College of Criminology of Our Lady of Fatima
University in Valenzuela City. They both live with their parents. CAROL has a cute shih tzu dog; one day while
CAROL was away on a date, CINDY took the dog without the consent of CAROL and sold it to her classmate.
What crime did CINDY commit?
A. Robbery C. Malicious mischief
B. Estafa D. Theft
47. When more than three armed persons form a band of robbers for the purpose of committing robbery in the
highway, the felony committed is:
A. Brigandage C. Piracy
B. Robbery D. None of these
48. To be liable for violation of the Anti-Fencing law of 1979 (PD No. 1612), a person who, with intent to gain for
himself or another, shall buy, receive, possess, keep, acquire, conceal, sell, or dispose of, or shall buy and sell,
any item, article, object which he knows, or should be known to him, to have been derived from the proceeds of
the crime of:
A. Robbery or Theft C. Theft only
B. Robbery only D. Robbery, Theft, or Estafa
49. A person who shall contract a second or subsequent marriage before the former marriage has been legally
dissolved is liable for what crime?
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 284
A. Adultery C. Bigamy
B. Concubinage D. None of these
50. HERCULES kidnapped ACHILLES and subsequently detained him in a rented property somewhere in
Valenzuela City. After detaining ACHILLES for 10 hours, HERCULES called ACHILLES’ wife to ask for the payment
of P2 million in exchange for the liberty of her husband. ACHILLES’ wife immediately agreed and deposited the
P2 million in HERCULES’ bank account. Five hours have passed before HERCULES was able to receive the money.
Thereafter, he quickly released ACHILLES. What crime is committed?
A. Slight illegal detention C. Kidnapping and serious illegal detention
B. Grave coercion D. Forcible abduction
51. It is the taking, with intent to gain, of a motor vehicle belonging to another without the latter’s consent, or
by means of violence against or intimidation of persons, or by using force upon things
A. Robbery C. Carnapping
B. Qualified theft D. Brigandage
52. IVAN entered the house of DIEGO through the chimney, just like what Santa Claus does. While inside, he
took a laptop computer on the table and immediately left the house without anyone seeing him. What crime, if
any, did IVAN commit?
A. Robbery C. Theft
B. Trespass to dwelling D. Malicious mischief
53. It is a crime committed by any married woman who shall have sexual intercourse with a man not her
husband and by the man who has carnal knowledge of her, knowing her to be married.
A. Concubinage C. Seduction
B. Bigamy D. Adultery
54. DENNIS and CARMEN were legally separated. Their child FRANCIS, a minor was placed in the custody of
CARMEN, subject to monthly visitations by DENNIS. On one occasion, when DENNIS had FRANCIS in his
company, DENNIS decided not to return FRANCIS to his mother. Instead, DENNIS took FRANCIS with him to
Spain where he intended for them to reside permanently. What crime, if any, did DENNIS commit?
A. Kidnapping and serious illegal detention C. Kidnapping and failure to return a minor
B. Kidnapping and slight illegal detention D. Corruption of minors
56. Which of the following is no longer a crime/s, according to the decision of the Supreme Court in Valenzuela
vs People (GR No. 160188, June 21, 2007):
A. Frustrated theft c. Both a and b
B. Frustrated robbery d. None of these
57. If someone was killed in the course of the commission of robbery, the crime committed is:
A. Robbery and homicide C. Homicide
B. Robbery D. Robbery with homicide
58. A person who, by means of violence, shall seize anything belonging to his debtor for the purpose of applying
the same to the payment of the debt is liable for what felony?
A. light threats C. Light coercions
B. Fraudulent insolvency D. None of these
59. By using a slingshot, RONNIE deliberately hit the favorite duck of his LOLA TASYA. As a consequence, the
duck died. RONNIE was charged with malicious mischief. RONNIE contended that he is exempt from criminal
liability pursuant to Art.332 of the Revised Penal Code. Is RONNIE correct?
A.Yes, because RONNIE is a descendant of his LOLA, thus exempt under Art. 332 of the Penal
Code
B. Yes, because RONNIE is a minor
C. No, because RONNIE committed a crime
D. No, because RONNIE intended to kill the duck of his LOLA
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 285
B. Damage D. None of these
61. DANNY burned to death his enemy FLORANTE. What crime is committed?
A. Arson C. Arson with homicide
B. Murder D. Murder and arson
62. JOAN and JANE are college classmates. They are both of legal age. JOAN burned the pen of JANE worth
P10.00 because JANE did not allow JOAN to copy her assignment in school. What crime, if any, did JOAN
commit?
A. Malicious mischief C. Unjust vexation
B. Arson D. No crime was committed
66. DONDON, a tricycle driver, plied his usual route using a Suzuki motorcycle with a sidecar. One evening, JOJO
rode on the sidecar, poked a knife at DONDON and instructed him to go near the bridge. Upon reaching the
bridge, JOJO alighted from the motorcycle and suddenly stabbed DONDON several times until he was dead.
JOJO fled from the scene taking the motorcycle with him. What crime/s did JOJO commit?
A. Homicide C. Carnapping with homicide
B. Carnapping and murder D. Carnapping and homicide
67. At about 11:00 in the evening, LANDO forced his way inside the house of ROGER. TIBURCIO, ROGER’s son,
saw LANDO and accosted him. LANDO pulled a knife and stabbed TIBURCIO on his abdomen. ROGER heard the
commotion and went out of his room. LANDO, who is about to escape, assaulted ROGER. TIBURCIO suffered
injuries, which were not for the timely medical attendance, would have caused his death. ROGER sustained
injuries that incapacitated him for 25 days. How many crime/s did LANDO commit?
A. 1 C. 3
B. 2 D. 4
68. In question no. 67, what kind of physical injuries did ROGER sustain?
A. Serious physical injuries C. Slight physical injuries
B. Less serious physical injuries D. Mutilation
69. In the crime of qualified seduction, the offended party should be a virgin. What kind of virginity does the law
contemplate?
A. Physical virginity C. Both a and b
B. Moral virginity D. None of these
71. NOAH proposed to his friend MARLON to kidnap ALLIE so that they can rape her. MARLON agreed. On the
date of their plan, the two had a change of heart and did not push through with the scheme. What crime, if any,
did NOAH and MARLON commit?
A. Attempted kidnapping C. Attempted rape
B. Attempted forcible abduction D. No crime was committed
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 286
73. After raping the complainant in her house, the accused struck a match to smoke a cigarette before departing
from the scene. The brief light from the match allowed him to notice a watch in her wrist. He demanded that she
hand over the watch. When she refused, he forcibly grabbed it from her. What crime/s did the accused commit?
A. Robbery with rape C. Rape and theft
B. Rape and robbery D. Qualified rape
74. An accused charged with violation of PD No. 1612 (Anti-fencing law of 1979) would have been
an____________ in theft or robbery had not the charge filed against him been fencing.
A. Principal C. Accessory
B. Accomplice D. None of these
78. PD No. 533, otherwise known as the Anti-cattle rustling law of 1974 is:
A. Part of the Revised Penal Code C. Either a or b
B. A special penal law D. None of these
79. It is the taking of personal property out of the possession of the owner
A. Robbery C. Asportation
B. Seizure D. None of these
80. If a person enters the dwelling or property of another without the consent of the owner, but the purpose of
such entry is to render some aid to humanity or justice, what crime, if any, did the person who entered
commit?
A. Trespass to dwelling C. Violation of domicile
B. Trespass to property D. No crime was committed
81. TT kidnapped KK in a dimly lit street. XX, a passerby saw what happened. TT noticed that XX witnessed his
act. As a consequence, TT killed XX. What is the crime committed?
A. Kidnapping with homicide C. Kidnapping and murder
B. Kidnapping and homicide D. None of these
82. A 7-year old child was raped by the friend of her father. What crime is committed?
A. Qualified rape C. Simple rape
B. Rape by sexual assault D. Seduction
83. By using a picklock, ABET ALINLANGAN successfully entered the house of POPOY. As ABET was about to
get the ipad and iphone on top of the table, he noticed POPOY descending from the stairs. Alarmed, he
went to POPOY and killed him. What is the crime committed?
A. Attempted robbery with homicide c. Attempted theft with homicide
B. Attempted robbery and homicide d. Attempted theft and homicide
84. What is the effect if the offender marries the offended party in rape, granting all the requisites for a valid
marriage are present?
A. The crime is extinguished C. both A and B
B. The criminal liability is extinguished D. No effect
85. DOY, a gigolo from Manila raped SISA, a barrio lass in Nueva Ecija. At the time of the commission of the
rape, DOY had no knowledge that SISA was a mental retardate. What is the crime committed?
A. Simple rape C. Sexual assault
B. Qualified rape D. Seduaction
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 287
86. AUBREY, a gorgeous ‘colegiala’ but a shoplifter went to SM Valenzuela and proceeded to the women’s wear
section. The saleslady was of the impression that she brought to the fitting room three (3) pieces of
swimsuits of different colors. When she came out of the fitting room, she returned only two (2) pieces to
the clothes rack. The saleslady became suspicious and alerted the store security. AUBREY was stopped by
the security before she could leave the store and brought to the office of the store manager. The security
and the manager searched her and found her wearing the third swimsuit under her blouse and pants.
What is the crime committed?
A. Attempted theft C. Consummated theft
B. Frustrated theft D. Robbery
87. The main difference between kidnapping and forcible abduction is the presence or absence of:
A. Taking of a person C. detention
B. Lewd design D. None of these
92. SIMPLICIO is married to the sister of DOLLY, and the three (3) live together in a house located in Malabon
City. On several occasions, DOLLY’s dog would bark at SIMPLICIO every time he arrives at past midnight.
One time, after arriving in the house at around 2 o’ clock in the morning, DOLLY’s dog barked
continuously at SIMPLICIO. In a fit of anger, SIMPLICIO entered the house, took a bolo and killed the
dog. What is the crime committed?
A. Malicious mischief C. Mutilation
B. Unjust vexation D. None of these
95. JERRY set the house of RAMONA on fire by way of revenge against the latter. JERRY did not know that
RAMONA was inside. RAMONA died because of the fire. What crime or crimes did JERRY commit?
A. Arson C. Arson with homicide
B. Homicide D. Arson and homicide
96. In question no. 95, suppose JERRY knew that RAMONA was inside, what crime/crimes did JERRY commit?
A. Homicide C. Arson and murder
B. Murder D. Arson and homicide
97. In question no. 95, suppose before setting it on fire, JERRY entered the house and killed RAMONA. Then
JERRY set the house on fire to hide the body of RAMONA. What crime/crimes did JERRY commit?
A. Murder C. Arson with homicide
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 288
B. Arson D. Murder and arson
100. It is a law that defines crimes, treats of their nature and provides for their punishment?
A. Criminal law C. Special penal law
B. Criminal jurisprudence D. Civil law
1. It is a provisional remedy issued upon an order of the court where an action is pending to be levied
upon the
property of the defendant, the same can be held thereafter by the sheriff as security for the
satisfaction of whatever
judgment might be secured in said action by the attaching creditor against the defendant.
A. Preliminary Injunction C. Preliminary Attachment
B. Motion for Prohibition D. Judgment
2. The provision remedies, in so far as there are applicable, may be availed of in connection with the
civil action
deemed instituted in _________________ .
A. Civil Case C. Administrative Action
B. Criminal Action D. Remedial Action
3. When the civil action is properly instituted in the criminal action, the offended party may have the
property of the
accused attached as security for the satisfaction of any judgment that may be recovered from the
accused in the
following cases:
A. When the accused is about to leave from the Philippines
B. When the accused has concealed, removed or disposed of his property or is about to do
so.
C. When the accused is out on bail.
D. When the criminal action is based on a claim for money or property embezzled or
fraudulently misapplied
or converted to the use of the accused who is a public officer, officer of a corporation,
attorney de facto,
broker or agent or clerk in the course of his employment as such.
4. This doctrine means that an unlawful search taints not only the evidence obtained there at but also
facts discovered
by reason of unlawful search.
A. Proof beyond reasonable doubt. C. Fruits of the poisonous tree.
B. Burden of proof D. Border Search
5. This rule commands that evidence obtained by an unreasonable search and seizure is excluded
from evidence.
A. Consented warrantless Search C. Exclusionary Rule
B. Stop and frisk on Terry search. D. Inspection Search
6. The filing of the petition for __________is considered a waiver of the accused’s right to appeal,
makes his
conviction final the moment he files said application.
A. New Trial C. Motion for Reconsideration
B. Probation D. Appeal
7. It is a ground for new trial except:
A. Error of Law
B. Irregularities prejudicial to the substantial rights of the accused have been committed
during the trial.
C. Failure to conduct preliminary Investigation
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 289
D. Newly discovered evidence has been discovered which accused could not with
reasonable diligent have
discovered and produced at the trial and submitted would probably changed the judgment.
8. It is a motion which can interrupt the running of the fifteen (15) day period to perfect an appeal.
A. Motion for new trial C. Motion for Reconsideration
B. Motion in Quash D. Motion for probation
9. How long is given to the accused to make his appeal before the judgment will become final and
executor?
A. 30 days C. 15 days
B. 45 days D. 20 days
10. Who may appeal?
A. Only the accused C. Any party
B. Only the complainant D. The prosecutor
11. In cases divided by the Metropolitan Trial Court, where should the appeal be filed?
A. To the court of Appeals C. To the Supreme Court
B. To the Regional Trial Court D. To the Municipal Trial Court
12. It is a ground for new trial except:
A. Errors of law
B. Irregularities prejudicial to the substantial rights of the accused have been committed
during the trial.
C. New and material evidence has been discovered which the accused could not with
reasonable diligence
have discovered and produced at the trial and which if introduced and admitted would
probably change the
judgment
D. minority of the accused
13. It may be granted by the court where the incompetency of the counsel for the defense is so great
that the defendant was
prejudicial and prevented from fairly presenting his defense.
A. New Trial C. Dismissal of the case
B. Reconsideration D. Judgment
14. Requisites of newly discovered evidence to be a valid ground for new trial, except:
A. The evidence was discovered after the trial
B. Such evidence could not have been discovered and produced at the trial even with
existence of reasonable diligence.
C. The evidence violates the Principle of Double Jeopardy.
D. The evidence must go to the merits and not rest on merely a technical defense.
15. It is a motion which may be filed after judgment but within period for perfecting an appeal.
A. Motion for reconsideration C. Motion for new trial
B. Motion to Quash D. Motion to file an appeal
16. It is a motion which may be presented only after either or both parties have formally offered and
closed their evidence, but
before judgment.
A. Motion to re-open trial C. Motion for reconsideration
B. Motion to file an appeal D. Motion to Quash
17. In all cases, when the court grants new trial, what happens to the original judgment?
A. The judgment is set aside or vacated C. The judgment become final and executory
B. The judgment is retained D. The judgment may be appealed
18. When a new trial is granted on the ground of newly discovered evidence, what happen to the
original evidence already
presented?
A. The evidence already presented remains C. The evidence already presented
will be set aside
B. The evidence already presented will be discard D. The evidence already presented
will not be given weight.
19. When criminal actions are brought to the Court of Appeals or to the supreme court, who must
represent the people of the
Philippines.
A. Public of the Philippines
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 290
B. The private prosecutor with the conformity of the Assistant Provincial Prosecutor
C. The judge
D. The Solicitor General
20. In cases decided by the Metropolitan Trial Court, Where should the appeal be filed?
A. Regional Trial Court C. To the Supreme Court
B. To the Court of Appeals D. to the Municipal Circuit Court
21. In cases decided by the court of Appeal where should the appeal be filed.
A. To the Supreme Court C. To the Solicitor General
B. To the Sandigan Bayan D. To the Court of Appeals itself
22. If the criminal case is dismissed by the court, or there is acquittal, can the complainant or the
offended party make an appeal.
A. No, because it is only the accused who can appeal in case of conviction.
B. No, the offended party or complainant cannot appeal the criminal aspect of the case.
C. Yes,the complainant or offended party may appeal the civil aspect of the case only.
D. Yes, the complainant and the accused are both given by law the right to appeal either
the criminal aspect or civil
aspect of the case.
23. What is the remedy of the accused in case a final judgment of conviction was rendered by the
court?
A. File an appeal C. File a motion to Quash the information
B. File a motion to set aside judgment D. File a motion for new trial
24. Who may appeal from a judgment or final order of the court?
A. Prosecution only C. Any Party
B. Defense only D. The judge
25. For purposes of determining appellate jurisdiction in criminal cases is the __________of the
penalty is taken account
A. Minimum of the penalty C. Maximum of the penalty
B. Medium of the penalty D. None of the above
26. When can a final judgment becomes final?
A. Upon the expiration of the period to appeal therefrom if no appeal has been duly
perfected.
B. Upon the expiration of the period of 30 days
C. Upon the expiration of the period of 10 days
D. Upon the expiration of the period of 20 days
27. Pedro was sentence to suffer five years imprisonment by final judgment. Before the period of
appeal lapsed, Pedro escaped.
Can he appeal his case?
A. Yes, because his right to appeal is provided in our constitution
B. Yes, because he opted to file an appeal because the period of appeal had not yet lapses
C. No, because he escaped; hence, he waived his right to appeal
D. Yes, his right to appeal is mandatory right.
28. The appeal to the Court of Appeal in cases decided by the Regional Trial Court in the exercise of
its appellate jurisdiction shall
be by ____________
A. Petition by Motion for Reconsideration C. Petition to re-open the trial
B. Petition for new trial D. Petition for review
29. How should be the service of the notice of appeal be secured if it cannot be made upon the
adverse party or his counsel.
A. By e-mail service C. By registered mail service
B. By telephone service D. By telegraph service
30. When is an appeal be taken?
A. Within fifteen (15) days from promulgation of the judgment
B. Within five (5) days from promulgation of the judgment
C. Within Thirty (30) days from promulgation of the judgment
D. Within twenty (20) days from promulgation of the judgment
31. Pedro is the complainant against Berto in a criminal case. Berto was convicted and the judgment
was promulgated. Before the
judgment became final the complainant filed an appeal. Does Pedro have the right to appeal in a
criminal case.
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 291
A. No, only the accused/convicted accused can appeal
B. Yes, the complainant can appeal on the civil aspect only of the case.
C. No, because he is the complainant, not the accused.
D. No, because such appeal made by the complainant will place the accused in double
jeopardy.
32. Mario was convicted on the complaint of Noel for homicide. Mario was sentenced to four years
and six months and one day.
Noel the complainant appealed on the ground that the penalty imposed was not proper. And
Noel prayed that it be
increased.Was the appeal of Mario Proper?
A. Yes, because he has also the right to appeal even if he is the complainant.
B. Yes, because the penalty imposed is really not proper.
C. No, the appeal of Noel would constitute a violation on the right of the accused for it will
fall under Double jeopardy.
D. Yes, because under the law, Rule 122, Sec.1, provides that any party may appeal from
a judgment or final order.
33. John was convicted by final judgment for the crime of murder. He was sentenced with an
imprisonment of Reclusion
Perpetua. He did not appeal. The judgment became final and executor. The Supreme Court by
its own power (motu propio)
reviewed the judgment. Is the Supreme Court correct?
A. No, because John did not appeal his judgment
B. No, because the proper person in interest (John) no longer wants to appeal his case.
C. Yes, the Supreme Court has the power to review judgment with maximum penalty of
Reclusion Perpetua,
automatically.
D. No, it is only the accused who can appeal his case.
34. When may the period for perfecting an appeal shall be suspended?
A. From the time a motion to re-open the trial is filed
B. From the time a motion for reconsideration is filed
C. From a time a motion to Quash the information is filed.
D. From the time a motion to dismiss is filed.
35. The world “Promulgation” refers to ___________.
A. Case Record C. Order
B. Judgment D. Trial
36. The word “ Notice” refers to ___________.
A. Judgment C. Trial
B. Case Record D. Order
37. Within how many days should the clerk of court with whom the notice of appeal was filed must
transmit to the clerk of court
of the appellate court the complete record of the case together with the said notice.
A. Ten days C. Five days
B. Fifteen days D. Twelve days
38. In all cases where the death penalty is imposed by the Trial Court, the records shall be forwarded
to the court of appeals for
automatic review within how many days from the promulgation of the judgment.
A. Within fifteen days but not earlier than ten days from the promulgation of the judgment
or notice of denial of a motion
for new trial or reconsideration.
B. Within twenty days but not earlier than fifteen days from the promulgation of the
judgment or notice of denial of a
motion for new trial or reconsideration.
C. Within ten days but not earlier than seven days from the promulgation of the judgment
or notice of denial of a
motion for new trial or reconsideration
D. Within seven days but not earlier than five days from the promulgation of the judgment
or notice of denial of a
motion for new trial or reconsideration
39. Juanito was convicted by the trial court. A Counsel de Oficio was appointed to him by the court
for his appeal since he is
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 292
confined in prison. To cut short the proceedings of appeal,the counsel de oficio of Juanito
withdraw the appeal. Is the action
of the consel de oficio proper?
A. Yes, because the counsel de oficio wishes to cut short the proceedings of the appeal
since he is not being paid by
Juanito.
B. Yes, because it is his right (counsel de oficio) to terminate the appeal at any time even
without the consent of Juanito.
C. No, he (counsel de oficio) cannot withdraw the appeal without the consent of Juanito.
D. Yes, considering that it was not Juanito who choose him (counsel de oficio) to be his
lawyer for his (Juanitos’) appeal.
40. There is a uniform procedure in the Municipal Trial Courts except:
A. In the municipal circuit trial court’s C. Municipal trial courts in cities
B. Metropolitan Trial Courts D. In criminal cases governed by the revised
Rules on summary procedures.
41. In all criminal cases appealed to the Court of Appeals the property appealing the case shall be
called the _______________
A. Complainant C. Appellee
B. Appellant D. Respondent
42. The adverse party of the aprty appealing the case is called the ______________
A. Appellant C. Plaintiff
B. Accused D. Appellee
43. The court of appeals may dismiss the appeal on the following ground except:
A. If appellant escapes from prison C. If appellant jumps bail
B. If appellant escapes from confinement D. If appellant files a motion for
reconsideration
44. It is one of the scope of judgment of the Court of Appeals except:
A. Reverse the judgment imposed by the trial court.
B. Affirm the judgment imposed by the trial court.
C. Increase or reduce the penalty imposed by the trial court.
D. Forward the case to the Supreme Court.
45. Trials and hearings in the court of appeals must be continuous and must be completed within
such period, unless extended by
the chief justice.
A. Within six (6) months C. Within three (3) months
B. Within ten (10) months D. Within twelve (12) months
46. Arturo was sentenced by the trial court with death penalty when death penalty is still on effect.
There was an automatic
review by the Supreme Court. While the case is still in the Supreme Court, the death penalty
was out lowed. The supreme
Court affirm the decision of the trial court. What should be the proper penalty to be imposed
upon the accused by the
supreme court.
A. Death Penalty C. Reclusion Perpetua
B. Reclusion Temporal D. Prison Correctional
47. A motion for reconsideration shall be filed within such period from notice of the decision or final
order of the court of Appeals,
with copies thereof served upon the adverse party, setting forth the grounds in support thereof.
A. Within fifteen (15) days C. Within twenty (20) days
B. Within ten (10) days D. Within thirty (30) days
48. Unless otherwise provided by the constitution or by law the procedure in the ____________in
original and in appealed cases
shall be the same as in the Court of Appeals.
A. Regional Trial Court C. Municipal Trial Court
B. Supreme Court D. Municipal Circuit Trial Court
49. The procedure for the review by the supreme court of decisions in criminal cases rendered by the
court of appeals shall be the
same in _____________________
A. Civil Cases C. Corporate cases
B. Administrative cases D. Quash criminal cases
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 293
50. When the Supreme Court en banc is equally divided in opinion or the necessary majority cannot
be had on whether to acquit
the appellant, the case shall again be deliberated upon and if no decision is reached after re-
deliberation the judgment of
conviction of the lower court shall be ___________.
51. It is an order in writing issued in the name of the people of the Philippines, signed by a judge and
directed to a peace officer,
commanding him to search for personal property described therein and bring it before the court.
A. Warrant of Arrest C. Information
B. Complaint D. Search Warrant
52. It refers to person and places particularly described thoroughly investigated or searched.
A. Seizure C. Confiscation
B. Search D. Take into custody
53. It refers to things particularly described to be taken away or confiscated or to be seized.
A. Search C. Looking for something
B. Seizure D. Thorough investigation
54. If the criminal action has already been filed where should the application for search warrant be
filed?
A. Any court within whose territorial jurisdiction of a crime was committed.
B. Any court within the judicial region where the crime was committed.
C. Any court within the judicial region where the warrant shall be enforced
D. In the court where the criminal action is pending
55. A search warrant may be issued for the search and seizure for this kind of property.
A. Real Property C. Personal property
B. Paraphernal Property D. Capital property
56. A _________A_________ shall not issue except upon (57)________B__ in connection with one
specific offense to be determined
personally by the (58) ______C______after examination under(59)_____D_________ or
affirmation of the
(60)_________E________ and the witnesses he may produce, and particularly describing the
place to be searched and the things
to be seized.
A. Search warrant C. Judge E.
Complainant
B. Probable cause D. Oath
61. During the arraignment, the accused must be ______________.
A. Represented by a proxy C. Out of the country
B. Present personally D. Represented by the prosecutor
62. What plea is recorded or entered for the accused if he refuses to plead?
A. Plea of guilty C. No plea is entered
B. Plea of not guilty D. Improvident plea of guilty
63. The reading of the complainant or information during the arraignment shall be done in what
dialect or language?
A. In English only C. In Spanish
B. In Tagalog only D. In the dialect or language known by the
accused
64. Total criminal liability is extinguished except by:
A. By service of sentence C. By prescription of crime
B. By absolute Pardon D. By conditional pardon
65. It is the Loss or waiver of the State of its right to prosecute an act prohibited and punished by law.
A. Prescription of jurisdiction C. Prescription of crime
B. Prescription of venue D. Prescription of penalty
66. It is an accusation in writing charging a person with an offense subscribed by the prosecutor or
fiscal and filled with the court.
A. Arrest C. Complainant
B. Information D. Warrant of Arrest
67. It is a sworn written statement charging a person with an offense, subscribed by the offended
party, any peace officer or other
public officer charged with the enforcement of the law violated.
A. Information C. Complaint
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 294
B. Search Warrant D. Warrant of Arrest
68. He shall have the direction and control in the prosecution of all criminal actions either
commenced by complaint or by
Information.
A. Public Prosecutor or fiscal C. Judge
B. Clerk of Court D. Investigator on case
69. It has the power to order a change of venue or place of trial to avoid a miscarriage of justice.
A. Congress C. Supreme Court
B. Court of Appeals D. Senate
70. The proper officer who issues a warrant of arrest.
A. Public Prosecutor C. Judge
B. Chief of Police D. Clerk of Court
71. It is defined as such facts and circumstances which would lead a reasonable discreet and prudent
man to believe that an offense has been committed and that the objects sought in connection with the
offense are in the place sought to be searched.
A. Personal Knowledge C. Probable Cause
B. Proof beyond reasonable doubt D. Principle of innocence
72. Requisites of a valid search warrant except:
A. It must be upon probable cause
B. The search warrant must particularly describe the place to be search and the things to
be seized
C. The search warrant must be issued in connection with the specific offense
D. The search warrant must involved real properties
73. It is a warrant which fails to sufficiently specify the place or person to be searched or things to be
seized.
A. Search Warrant C. Provisionary Search Warrant
B. General Search Warrant D. Probationary Search Warrant
74. The officer, enforcing the search warrant if refused admittance to the place of directed search
after giving notice of his
purpose and authority, what may be his legal; move?
A. May break open any outer or inner door of a house
B. May break open any outer or inner window of a house
C. May liberate himself when unlawfully detained.
D. All of the above
75. How should a search of a house, room, or any other premises be made?
A. Presence of the lawful occupant C. Two witnesses of
sufficient age and discretion
B. Presence of any member of the occupant’s family D. All of the above
76. PO1 Reyes was enforcing a search warrant, he introduced himself to the occupant of the house
and mentioned his purpose,
however he was refuse admittance. What should be the legal move of PO1 Reyes?
A. May break open the door C. May break any part of the house to make
an entry
B. May break open the window D. All of the above
77. The validity of the search warrant.
A. Ten (10) days from its date C. Seven (7) days from its date
B. Fifteen (15) days from its date D. Five (5) days from its date
78. To whom the officer who served the search warrant return the property seized?
A. To the prosecutor C. To the complainant
B. To the judge who issued the warrant D. To the clerk of court
79. Berto was seen and observed by PO2 Peralta in the act of picking the wallet of Carlos. Berto
successfully took possession of
the wallet of Carlos. At this instance PO2 Peralta arrested Berto and when PO2 Peralta search
Berto a bladed weapon was
found in his possession. Berto was charged with theft and illegal possession of deadly weapon.
He countered that the search
made by PO2 Peralta on his person is illegal. Is Berto correct?
A. Yes, because PO2 Peralta have no search warrant when he searched Berto.
B. Yes, the deadly weapon cannot be used as evidence against Berto because it was
illegally searched.
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 295
C. No, because the search made by PO2 Peralta is incidental to a lawful arrest.
D. Yes, because PO2 Peralta abused his authority when he searched Berto without a
warrant.
80. The rule that searches and seizures must be.supported by a valid search is not absolute. The
exception is:
A. Search incidental to a lawful arrest C. Stop and Frisk
B. Plain view seizure D. all of the above E. None of the
above
81. A valid search warrant was issued against Roberto. When the warrant was served on the house
of Roberto, an unlicensed
firearm was found in his room which is not included in the search warrant. He was charged for
illegal possession of
unlicensed firearm. Will the case against Roberto prosper?
A. Yes, because he was in possession of an unlicensed firearm
B. Yes, because seizure of the unlicensed firearm is incidental to a lawful search.
C. No, because the firearm is not one of those personal properties ordered to be seized by
the court, and therefore
illegally obtained evidence.
D. Yes, although it is not included in the search warrant, the firearm which is unlicensed is
illegal and therefore can be
confiscated and seized
82. This doctrine means that an unlawful search taints not only the evidence obtained during the
search but also facts discouraged
by reason of said unlawful search
A. Principle of double jeopardy C. Proof of beyond reasonable doubt
principle
B. Principle of a fruit a Poisonous tree D. Search incidental to a lawful arrest
principle
83. It is defined as the vernacular designation of the right of a police officer to stop a citizen on the
street, interrogate him and put
him for weapons,
A. Stop & Frisk C. Waiver
B. Plain view seizure D. Consented warrantless search
84. This rule commands that evidence obtained by an unreasonable search and seizure is excluded
from evidence.
A. Exclusionary rule C. Plain view doctrine
B. Fruit of a poisonous tree doctrine D. Stop & Frisk Principle
85. In this principle, the law requires that there be fist a lawful arrest before a search can be made.
A. Plain view doctrine C. Search incidental to lawful arrest
B. Stop & Frisk Doctrine D. Inspection search
86. The purpose of search incidental to A lawful arrest, except:
A. Protect the arresting officer against physical harm from the person being arrested
B. The person being arrested might be concealing weapons to be used against the officer
C. To protect the person arrested from destroying evidence within his reach.
D. To know the identity of the arrested person.
87. The search warrant was issued on February 01, 2012, up to what date will it be valid?
A. Feb 09, 2012 C. Feb 12, 2012
B. February 11,2012 D. February 10,2012
88. The officer after the conduct of search and seizure must do the following except:
A. Give a detailed receipt of the property seized to the lawful occupant.
B. Leave a detailed receipt of the property in the place in which he found the seized
property in the presence of at least
two witnesses of sufficient age and discretion residing in the same locality.
C. Deliver immediately the property seized to the issuing judge together with the true and
duly verified under oath
inventory thereof
D. Deliver immediately the property seized in a bonded warehouse for safekeeping even
without the approval of the
court.
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 296
89. The extent of warrantless search may be made on the person of the suspect and immediate
vicinity or surrounding area of the
place of arrest, except:
A. In his room
B. Confined place within the accused’s immediate control
C. In his house situated 150 kmtrs away from the place of arrest
D. Premises of surroundings under his immediate control.
90 Routine inspection are not regarded as violative of an individual’s right against unreasonable
search, except:
A. Where the occupants are subjected to a physical or body search
B. Where the officers flashes a light therein without opening the car’s door
C. Where the inspection of the vehicle is limited to a visual search or visual inspection
D. Where the routine check is conducted in a fixed area
QUESTION 91 TO 100
Blacken A, if both statements are correct; B if the first statement is correct and the second is incorrect;
C if the first statement is incorrect and the second is correct; D if both statements are incorrect:
91. The frisk and search of a person is a permissible precautionary measure to protect the officer
from such person who might be armed with dangerous weapon. Warrantless search or incoming and
outgoing passengers at the arrival and departure areas of an international airport is universally
allowed. A
92. Stop and frisk is limited protective search of outer clothing for weapons. A waiver of an illegal
warrantless also mean a waiver of the inadmissibility of evidence seized during an illegal warrantless
arrest.B
93. Warrantless search incidental to s lawful arrest may be made on the person only of the suspect
and not in the immediate vicinity or surrounding area of the place of arrest. Warrantless search
incidental to a lawful arrest may be made on the premises or surroundings under the persons
immediate control.C
94. Where the search is made pursuant to a lawful arrest, there is always need to obtain a search
warrant. When the accused was caught inflagrante (in the act) there must be a search warrant to
search him and a warrant of arrest for his arrest.D
95. The search warrant is valid for ten days from its date. The warrant must direct that it be served in
the day time unless the affidavit asserts that the property is on the person or in the place ordered to
be searched, in which case a direction may be inserted that it be served at any time of the day or
night.A
96. A search warrant may be issued for the search and seizure of personal property. An application
for search warrant may be filed in any court within which whose territorial jurisdiction a crime was
committed.A
97. Search refers to persons and places particularly described to be searched. A warrant of arrest is
an order in writing issued in the name of the people of the Philippines, signed by the judge and
directed to a place of officer, commanding him to search for personal property described therein and
bring it before the court.B
98. A motion to re-open trial maybe filed after judgment but within the period for reconsideration can
interrupt the running of the 15 day period to perfect an appeal.C
99. Decisions of cases in the court of appeals is appealable to the Regional Trial Courts. Cases
decided by the regional trial courts are appealable to the Metropolitan Trial Courts.D
100. For the purpose of determining appellate jurisdiction in criminal cases, the maximum of the
penalty and not the minimum is taken into account. The period within which to perfect an appeal is
fifteen (15) days.A
B. Secondary Evidence
C. Best Evidence
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 297
D. Res gestae
B
B. Composite
C. Continuing
D. compound
B. Defense
C. Prosecution
D. Clerk of Court
C. inducing a minor
D. kidnapping B
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 298
A. Estafa
B. falsification
C. Forgery
D. All of these
B. Inheritance
C. Tradition Heritage
B. of"law
C. Disputable
D. of fact
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 299
D. when he is a graduate of criminology
A. Factum probans
B. Factum probandum
C. Owe probandi
D. Owes probandi
A. Res gestae
B. Burden of Evidence
C. Burden of Proof
D. Estoppel
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 300
B
A. attempted estafa
B. frustrated estafa
C. attempted fraud
D. consummated fraud
A. Preponderance of evidence
B. Evidentiary fact
C. Ultimate Fact
D. Weight of Evidence
A. Capacity of observation
B. Capacity of recollection
C. Capacity of Knowledge
D. Capacity of communication
A. Primary
B. Real
C. Best
D. Conclusive
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 301
18. Which in the following enumeration is an example of
an afflictive penalty?
A. Fine
B. arresto mayor
C. prison mayor
D. destierro
A. negligence of duty
B. leniency or laxity
C. dereliction of duty
D. infidelity
A. Cognizance
B. Judicial Admission
C. Judicial Knowledge
D. Judicial Notice
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 302
B. leave it blank as error is merely clerical and can
be corrected during trial
A. Parole Evidence
B. Ante-mortem statement
A. Piracy
B. Felonies
C. Theft
D. Suicide
A. Prospectivity
B. Generality
C. Territoriality
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 303
D. Immunity
A. Felony
B. Mala Inse
C. Mala Incest
D. Mala prohibita
B. Mistake of facts
D. Mistake in identity
A. French Rule
B. Spanish Rule
C. American Rule
D. English Rule
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 304
29. What should the court do when the offense is less
serious physical injuries and the offense proved is
serious physical injuries and the defendant may be
convicted only of the offense as charged?
A. Grave
B. Light
C. Less grave
D. Serious
A. Grave
B. Light
C. Less grave
D. Serious
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 305
33. What circumstance can be considered aggravating with
the slaying of an 80 year old woman?
A. abuse of confidence
C. neglect of elders
D. disrespect of rank
A. Justifying circumstances
B. Mitigating Circumstance
C. Exempting circumstances
D. Aggravating circumstances
A. 3 Y E A R S
B. S I X Y E A R S
C. 6 M O N T H S I M P R I S O N M E N T
D. 4 Y E A R S A N D 2 M O N T H S
C
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 306
D
A. Generic
B. Specific
C. Qualifying
D. Inherent
A. W I T N E S S E S
B. A C C E S S O R I E S
C. P R I N C I P A L S
D. A C C O M P L I C E S
B
A. Generic
B. Specific
C. Qualifying
D. Inherent
A. T R E A C H E R Y
B. N I G H T T I M E
C. I G N O M I N Y
D. T A K I N G A D V A N T A G E O F S U P E R I O R S T R E N G T H
A
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 307
A. M A L A P R O H I B I T A
B. F E L O N I E S
C. V I O L A T I O N O F O R D I N A N C E
D. M A L A I N S E
B
A. S I L V E R P L A T T E R
B. E X C L U S I O N A R Y D O C T R I N E
C. F R U I T O F T H E P O I S O N O U S T R E E
D. M I R A N D A R U L I N G
A
A. N O N E O F T H E S E
B. A D U L T E R Y
C. C O N C U B I N A G E
D. B I G A M Y
D
A. D E L I V E R I N G P R I S O N E R S F R O M J A I L S
B. E V A S I O N T H R O U G H N E G L I G E N C E
C. R E C K L E S S I M P R U D E N C E
D. C O N N I V I N G W I T H O R C O N S E N T I N G T O E V A S I O N
B
A. E S T A F A
B. A L L O F T H E S E
C. F A L S I F I C A T I O N
D. F O R G E R Y
B
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 308
particularly those of physical injuries, estafa,
theft and robbery is considered as a:
A. recidivist
B. habitual Delinquent
C. delinquent
D. quasi-recidvist
A. E V I D E N C E
B. P R O C E D U R E
C. I N V E S T I G A T I O N
D. T R I A L
A
A. Group
B. Band
C. Brigands
D. Team
A. R E S NULLUS
B. R E S IPSA LOQUITUR
C. R E S JUDICATA
D. R E S GESTAE
D
A. I S L I A B L E F O R M U R D E R
B. I S A N A C C E S S O R Y T O T H E C R I M E
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 309
C. I S A C O N S P I R A T O R
D. I N C U R S N O C R I M I N A L L I A B I L I T Y
C
A. M I S T A K E N I D E N T I T Y
B. M I S T A K E I N T H E B L O W
C. R E S U L T S A R E L E S S T H A N I N T E N D E D
D. R E S U L T I S G R E A T E R T H A N I N T E N D E D
A
A. O R A L D E F A M A T I O N
B. B L A C K M A I L
C. S L A N D E R
D. I N C R I M I N A T O R Y M A C H I N A T I O N S
D
A. P H Y S I C A L I N J U R I E S
B. A T T E M P T E D F E L O N Y
C. F R U S T R A T E D F E L O N Y
D. N O C R I M I N A L L I A B I L I T Y
C
A. Treason
C. Espionage
D. Levying war
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 310
A. W A R R A N T O F A R R E S T
B. S E A R C H W A R R A N T
C. S U B P O E N A
D. S U M M O N S
B
A. Aid or comfort
C. Levying war
A. E X E C U T I V E J U D G E
B. S U P R E M E C O U R T
C. R E G I O N A L T R I A L C O U R T S
D. R E G I O N A L S T A T E P R O S E C U T O R
B
A. S E C O N D A R Y E V I D E N C E
B. P A R O L E E V I D E N C E
C. C O R O L L A R Y E V I D E N C E
D. B E S T E V I D E N C E
A
A. P A R D O N
B. A M N E S T Y
C. R E P R I E V E
D. P E N A L T Y
A
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 311
60. A person having knowledge of the plans to commit
treason and fails to disclose such information to
the governor, fiscal or mayor is guilty of what
crime?
A. Treason
C. Espionage
D. Misprision of Treason
A. C O M P O S I T E
B. C O M P O U N D
C. C O N T I N U I N G
D. C O M P L E X
C
A. W H E N I T C H A N G E S T H E B U R D E N O F P R O O F
B. W H E N E V I D E N C E F O R T H E P R O S E C U T I O N I S S T R O N G
C. W H E R E N O P O S I T I V E A N D P R O P E R I D E N T I F I C A T I O N HAS BEEN
SATISFACTORILY MADE
D. W H E N Q U E S T I O N S O N WHETHER OR NOT ACCUSED COMMITTED THE
OFFENSE IS CLEAR
B
A. Mutiny
B. Piracy
C. Espionage
D. Sedition
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 312
A. M I R A N D A RULE
B. R U L E O F FACILITATION
C. R U L E O F INTERVENTION
D. R U L E O F RESERVATION
A
A. Mutiny
B. Piracy
C. Espionage
D. Sedition
A. M O T I O N TO DISMISS
B. M O T I O N FOR REVIEW
C. M O T I O N FOR RECONSIDERATION
D. M O T I O N TO QUASH
C
A. R E C I D I V I S M
B. I N S A N I T Y
C. T R E A C H E R Y
D. I N T O X I C A T I O N
C
A. A C T W I T H D I S C E R N M E N T
B. A C T C A R E L E S S L Y O R N E G L I G E N T L Y
C. S H O W C R I M I N A L I N T E N T
D. S H O W M A L I C E
A
A. P O L I C E M A N
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 313
B. MMDA E N F O R C E R
C. B A R A N G A Y C A P T A I N
D. B A R A N G A Y T A N O D
A
A. C A P I T A L P U N I S H M E N T
B. C O M P L E X C R I M E
C. C O N T I N U O U S O F F E N S E
D. C I V I L I N T E R D I C T I O N
A
A. N O T L I A B L E A T A L L
B. L I A B L E F O R O B S C E N E P U B L I C A T I O N ( A S C O - P U B L I S H E R )
C. L I A B L E F O R P O R N O G R A P H Y
D. liable for the obscene publications (as author)
A. C O U R T M U S T C A U S E T H E T R U E N A M E T O B E I N S E R T E D
B. W H A T I S P I V O T A L I S T H E N A M E A N D D E S C R I P T I O N OF THE
OFFENDER
C. T H E P O L I C E M U S T L A B E L T H E P R O P E R T Y I N A W A Y T H A T W I L L
DISTINGUISH IT FROM OTHERS
D. D E S C R I B E THE PROPERTY SUBJECT MATTER WITH SUCH
PARTICULARITY AS TO PROPERLY IDENTIFY, THE PARTICULAR
OFFENSE CHARGED
D
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 314
A. P E R S O N A L L Y , I N O P E N C O U R T A N D O F T H E R E C O R D
B. B Y T H E A P P R O V A L O F T H E C O U R T A N D U P O N W R I T T E N R E Q U E S T B Y
THE ACCUSED
C. T H R O U G H C O U N S E L I N O P E N C O U R T A N D O N T H E R E C O R D
D. P E R S O N A L L Y B Y W R I T T E N M O T I O N
B
A. S L I G H T P H Y S I C A L I N J U R Y
B. S E R I O U S P H Y S I C A L I N J U R I E S
C. I L L T R E A T M E N T
D. L E S S S E R I O U S P H Y S I C A L I N J U R Y
B
A. W H E T H E R O R N O T A W A S D R U N K A T T H E T I M E
B. T H E B A R A N G A Y C O U R T H A S N O J U R I S D I C T I O N O V E R T H E C A S E
C. W H E T H E R O R N O T B W A S A L S O D R U N K
D. None of the above
A. M I T I G A T I N G C I R C U M S T A N C E
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 315
B. A G G R A V A T I N G C I R C U M S T A N C E
C. E X E M P T I N G C I R C U M S T A N C E
D. A L T E R N A T I V E C I R C U M S T A N C E
D
A. C I R C U M S T A N T I A L
B. C O R R O B O R A T I V E
C. H E A R S A Y
D. D I R E C T
C
A. P A R R I C I D E
B. G R A V E T H R E A T S
C. H O M I C I D E
D. M U R D E R
A
A. C O M M O N R E P U T A T I O N
B. R E S G E S T A E
a. dying declaration
A. B’ S D E A T H I S I N D I S P E N S A B L E
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 316
B. T H E D E C L A R A T I O N W A S N O T W R I T T E N
C. N O M E N T I O N W A S M A D E T H A T B’ S W O U N D W A S F A T A L
D. B H A S A G R U D G E A G A I N S T A
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 317
84. Assuming that the public persecutor on the basis of
the now written confession of A, who waived his
right of counsel because he could not afford one,
filed the information against him and the judge
after trial, convicted A on the basis of his written
confession. A would like to appeal his case to a
higher court. The appeal should be filed -
D. None of these
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 318
A
B. August 1, 1983
C. January 1, 1983
D. December 1, 1980
88. Criminal procedure is a
A. substantive law
B. constitutional law
C. administrative law
A. criminal investigation
B. pre-trial conference
C. preliminary investigation
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 319
90. Defined as the taking of a person into custody in
order that he may be bound to answer for the
commission of an offense
A. None of these
B. Custody
C. Detention or imprisonment
D. Investigation
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 320
D. all of these
A. Arbitration
B. Confrontation
C. Compromise
D. Mediation/conciliation
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 321
97. The power or authority of a court to try, hear and
decide a class of criminal case brought before it
A. criminal jurisprudence
B. criminal jurisdiction
C. criminal procedure
A. court interpreter
B. clerk of court
C. legal researcher
A. RA No 7691
B. RA No 8493
C. RA No 7438
D. RA No 7659
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 322
1. Berto, with evident premeditation and
treachery killed his father. What was the crime
committed?
A. Murder
B. Parricide
C. Homicide
D. Qualified Homicide - B
3. Charlie and Lea had been married for more than six months.
They live together with the children of Lea from her first
husband. Charlie had sexual relationship with Jane, the 14
year old daughter of Lea. Jane loves Charlie very much.
What was the crime committed by Charlie, if any?
A. Simple Seduction
B. Qualified Seduction
C. Consented Abduction
D. Rape - B
5. A warrant of arrest was issued against Fred for the killing of
his parents. When PO2 Tapang tried to arrest him, Fred gave
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 323
him 1 million pesos to set him free. PO2 Tapang refrained in
arresting Fred. What was the crime committed by PO2 Tapang?
A. Indirect Bribery
B. Direct Bribery
C. Corruption of Public Officials
D. Qualified Bribery - D
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 324
C. venue
D. bench - C
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 325
20. An offense committed by a married woman through carnal
knowledge with a man not her husband who knows her to be
married, although the marriage can be later declared void.
A. concubinage
B. bigamy
C. adultery
D. immorality - C
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 326
C. perjury
D. slander - C
31. Ways and means are employed for the purpose of trapping and
capturing the law breaker in the execution of his criminal
plan.
A. Misfeasance
B. entrapment
C. inducement
D. instigation - B
35. At what time may the accused move to quash the complaint or
information?
A. at any time before his arrest
B. only after entering his plea
C. any time before entering his plea
D. Monday morning - C
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 327
36. The process whereby the accused and the prosecutor in a
criminal case work out a mutually satisfactory disposition on
the case subject to court approval.
A. Arraignment
B. plea bargaining
C. preliminary investigation
D. trial - B
41. It is evidence of the same kind and to the same state of facts.
A. secondary evidence
B. prima facie evidence
C. corroborative evidence
D. best evidence - C
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 328
D. best evidence - B
44. When the witness states that he did not see or know the
occurrence of a fact.
A. positive evidence
B. corroborative evidence
C. secondary evidence
D. negative evidence - D
46. All persons who can perceive and perceiving, can make known
their perception to others.
A. Suspects
B. witnesses
C. victims
D. informers - B
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 329
C.prejudicial question
D.judicial question - C
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 330
A. responsibility
B. duty
C. guilt
D. imputability - D
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 331
63. Circumstances wherein the acts of the person are in accordance
with the law, and hence, he incurs no criminal and civil
liability.
A. exempting
B. alternative
C. justifying
D. aggravating - C
65. One, who at the time of his trial for one crime shall have been
previously convicted by final judgment of another crime
embraced in the same title of the Revised Penal Code.
A. Recidivism
B. habitual delinquency
C. reiteracion
D. quasi-recidivism - A
66. Alevosia means
A. Craft
B. treachery
C. evident premeditation
D. cruelty - B
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 332
C. Secondary
D. Conclusive - D
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 333
77. A sworn statement in writing, made upon oath before an
authorized magistrate or officer.
A. subpoena
B. writ
C. warrant
D. affidavit - D
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 334
C. rebellion
D. coup d’ etat - A
88. It means that the resulting injury is greater than that which
is intended.
A. Aberratio ictus
B. Error in personae
C. Dura Lex Sed lex
D. Praeter Intentionem - D
90. A stage of execution when all the elements necessary for its
execution and accomplishment are present.
A. Attempted
B. Frustrated
C. Consummated
D. Accomplished - C
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 335
D. Continuing - A
99. Pedro stole the cow of Juan. What was the crime committed?
A. Robbery
B. Farm Theft
C. Qualified Theft
D. Simple Theft - C
PRUDENCE RESEARCH & REVIEW CENTER: Crimjuris – Part Five Page 336