1F 2020 v. Abbas v.

Abbas
Persons and Family Relations i. Ninal v. Bayadog
j. Cases under Authority of the Solemnizing Officer – Who
LANDMARK CASES / CASES DISCUSSED are authorized / How authorized
i. Aranes v. Occiano
I. Introduction ii. Navarro v. Domagtoy
iii. Beso v. Daguman
II. Effect and application of laws iv. Ronulo v. People of the Philippines
a. Tanada v. Tuvera v. Villar v. Paraiso
b. Garcillano v. House of Representatives k. Cases under Marriage Ceremony – Form of Ceremony
c. Internal Revenue v. Primetown (compare and contrast)
i. Martinez v. Tan
III. Persons & Personality ii. Morigo v People
a. Geluz v. CA l. Republic v. Orbecido III
b. Cases on Minority (compare and contrast the following m. Fujiki v. Marinay
cases) n. Eugenio v. Velez
i. Mercado v. Espiritu o. Estrada v. Escritor
ii. Bambalan v. Maramba p. Cases under BIGAMOUS / POLYGAMOUS marriages
iii. Suan Chian v. Alcantara (remember the table? Important to note: date of marriage
iv. Braganza v. Villa-Abrille and date of complaint)
c. Cases on Insanity i. BEFORE FC
1. People v. Aragon* (no need)
IV. Introduction to the Family Code 2. People v. Mendoza* (no need)
a. Bernabe v. Alejo 3. Gomez v. Lipana (need)
4. Consuegra v. GSIS (need)
V. Marriage and Personal Relations Between Spouses 5. Oduyat v. Amante (no need)
a. Obergefell et al. v. Hodges et al. 6. Ty v. CA (no need)
b. Goitia v. Campos-Rueda 7. Apiag v. Cantero (no need)
c. Espinosa v. Atty Omana 8. Wiegel v. Sempio-Diy* (need)
d. Cases under Breach of promise to marry (compare and 9. Yap v. CA (need)
contrast the following cases) ii. FC (After August 3 1988)
i. Hermosisima v. CA 1. Mercado v. Tan (need)
ii. Wassmer v. Velez 2. Morigo v. Morigo (no need)
iii. Tanjanco v. CA 3. People v. Cobar (need)
iv. Baksh v. CA 4. Tenebro v. CA (need)* – read
v. Abanag v. Mabute concurring opinion of Justice Vitug and
e. Silverio v. Republic dissent of Justice Carpio
f. Republic v. Cagandahan iii. Other cases included in Syllabus
g. Jimenez v. Canizares (impotence of wife) q. Bienvenido v. CA
h. Cases under Formal Requisites – Marriage license r. Republic v. Granada
(compare and contrast the following cases) s. Cases under Psychological Incapacity under FC 36
i. Republic v. CA i. Landmark
ii. Sy v. CA 1. Santos v. CA – not void
iii. Alcantara v. Alcantara 2. Chi Ming Tsoi v. CA - void
iv. De Castro v. De Castro 3. Republic v. Molina – not void
 ii. VOID under FC 36
1. Antonio v. Reyes (the VI. The Law on Separation of the Spouses (suggestion: read
impulsive/pathological liar) one case per ground for legal sep. as well as defenses.
2. Te v. Te Refer to syllabus)
a. Petitioner: Dependent
Personality Disorder VII. Rights and Obligations of Spouses
b. Respondent: Antisocial
Personality Disorder VIII. Property Relations of the Spouses
3. Halili v. Halili (mixed personality disorder a. Matabuena v. Cervantes (donation to common law wife /
– dependent and self-defeating) concubine)
4. Camacho-Reyes v. Reyes (Both resp. b. ACP
and pet.: mixed personality disorder) i. Luzon Surety Co., Inc. v. De Garcia
iii. NOT VOID ii. Noveras v. Noveras (mentioned a lot of times)
1. Hernandez v. CA iii. Quiao v. Quiao
2. Marcos v. Marcos iv. Buenaventura v. CA
3. Republic v. Dagdag v. Dino v. Dino
4. RP vs. Quintero-Hermano vi. Yu v. Reyes-Carpio
5. Republic v. Tanyag-San Jose* c. CPG
6. Almelor v. RTC – Las Pinas i. Berciles v. GSIS
7. Azcueta v. RP ii. Ayala Investment v. CA
8. Najera v. Najera iii. Ravina v. Villa-Abrille
9. Kalaw v. Fernandez iv. Cheeseman v. IAC
10. Mendoza v. Republic d. Regime of Separation of Property
11. Republic v. De Gracia e. Judicial Separation of Property
12. Vinas v. Vinas f. Property Regime of Unions w/o Marriage
13. Mallilin v. Jamesolamin i. Cases under Unions under FC 147
14. Yuk Ling Ong v. Co* (summons were 1. Valdes v. QC-RTC
not received, thus no jurisdiction over 2. Dino v. Dino
respondent’s person) 3. Others (refer to syllabus)
15. Rep v. Encelon ii. Cases under Unions under FC 148
t. Cases under Effects of final judgment declaring nullity 1. Bienvenido v. CA
(compare and contrast ) 2. Others (refer to syllabus)
i. Valdes v. QC-RTC g. Property Relations of Mixed marriages
ii. Dino v. Dino i. Borromeo v. Descallar
iii. Yu v. Reyes-Carpio ii. Cheeseman v. IAC
u. B.M. No. 1625 – Josephine P. Uy-Timosa iii. Others (refer to syllabus)
v. Remo v. DFA
w. Katipunan v. Tenorio (38 OG 172)
x. Anaya v. Palaroan (fraud)
y. Villanueva v. CA (force, intimidation and undue influence)
z. Quiao v. Quiao (definition of net profit)
aa. Van Dorn v. Romillo
bb. Somera v. Pilapil (or Pilapil v. Ibay-Somera)
cc. People v. De Guzman (marriages giving rise to criminal
liability)