Professional Documents
Culture Documents
College of Law
COURSE SYLLABUS
COURSE DESCRIPTION:
This course is a study of the basic principles of international law and an overview of the legal principles
governing international relations based among others, on the United Nations Charter, the doctrines of
well-known and recognized publicists, and the decisions of international tribunals and bodies. It
includes a review of relevant international and Philippine case and treaty law.
Know and understand the laws, memorize provisions, develop critical and analytical thinking, effective
in written and oral communication, logical reasoning, and sound judgment, exercise of proper
professional and ethical responsibilities.
Upon completion of the PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW course, the student is expected to be able to:
Expected College of
Law Graduate LEARNING OUTCOMES (LOs)
Attributes (ELGAs)
Critical and analytical LO1. Understand the nature of international law in the context of the
thinking Philippine constitutional and legal framework and how it influences
Effective in written legislative, executive and judicial action
and oral
communication LO2. Analyze/Criticize/Compare international and Philippine cases
Logical reasoning applying international law principles
Sound judgment
LO3. Apply the principles of international law and relevant case
doctrines in a given hypothetical or actual situation.
LO4. Utilize legal research tools to gather information that aids in the
analysis of legal issues in submitting the Research Paper.
ASSESSMENT/GRADING SYSTEM:
Percentage
(Weight is based
Scope of Work
Requirements (Based on the Learning Outcomes) on the
(Individual)
importance of
the LO)
LO1 Class recitations, Quizzes, Case Digests, Individual
LO2 and discussion Individual
LO3 Individual
LO4 - - Research Paper, Case Study
LEARNING PLAN:
WEEK/ LEARNING
LEARNING DATE METHODS
RESOURCES (Schedule (activities
TOPIC/CONTENT (print and non- of each designed or
(arrangement or sequence of the major topics is based print materials Topic, deployed by the
on a logical order) and online/ Assign, teacher to bring
open-access Exam for about, or create
resources) the entire the conditions
semester) for learning)
Course Introduction
Course overview Syllabus Feb. 8-13, Lecture
Course assignments 2021 Discussion
Course requirements
b. Secondary Sources
i. Judicial Decisions
ii. Writings of Publicists
- Functions of Equity and
Principle of Ex aequo et bono
- Other Supplementary
Evidence
- Hard Law v. Soft Law
Cases:
1) Kuroda v. Jalandoni, G.R. No. L-2662, March 26,
1949
2) Co Kim Chan v. Valdez Tan Keh, G.R. No. L-5,
September 17, 1945
3) Ichong v. Hernandez, G.R. No. L-7995, May 31,
1957
4) Gonzalez v. Hechanova, G.R. No. L-21897,
October 22, 1963
5) Mejoff v. Director of Prisons, 90 Phil. 70
6) Paquete v. Habana, 175 U.S. 677
7) Mijares v. Ranada, G.R. No. 139325, April 12,
2005 (455 SCRA 397)
8) Pharmaceutical and Health Care
Association v. Duque, G.R. No. 173034, October
19, 2007
9) Columbia v. Peru, ICJ Rep. 266, (1950)
10) Reagan v. CIR, 30 SCRA 968
11) Agustin v. Edu, 88 SCRA 195
12) Republic v. Sandiganbayan, 407 SCRA 10
13) Tanada v. Angara, 272 SCRA 18
14) Bayan Muna v. Romulo, 641 SCRA 244
15) Vinuya v. Romulo, 619 SCRA 533
2.10 Individuals
3.3 Membership
a. Classes, Qualifications, Admission,
Suspension, Expulsion and Withdrawal
b. Doctrines of Succession
MODULE 5: RECOGNITION
Cases:
1) Russian Socialist Federated Soviet Republic v.
Cibrario, New York Court of Appeals, 1923, 235 NY
255
2) Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabatino, 376 US 398
3) Oetjen v. Central Leather Co., 246 US. 297
Cases:
1) Underhill v. Hernandez, 168 U.S. 250
2) PCGG v. Sandiganbayan, 530 SCRA 13
3) Baer v. Tizon, 57 SCRA 1
4) Syquia v. Almeda Lopez, 84 Phil. 312
5) U.S.A. v. Guinto, G.R. No. 76607
6) U.S.A. v. Rodrigo, G.R. No. 79470
7) U.S.A. v. Ceballos, G.R. No. 80018
8) U.S.A. v. Vergara, 182 SCRA 644
9) U.S.A. v. Ruiz, 136 SCRA 487
WEEK/ LEARNING
LEARNING DATE METHODS
RESOURCES (Schedule (activities
TOPIC/CONTENT (print and non- of each designed or
(arrangement or sequence of the major topics is based print materials Topic, deployed by the
on a logical order) and online/ Assign, teacher to bring
open-access Exam for about, or create
resources) the entire the conditions
semester) for learning)
10) U.S.A. v. Reyes, 219 SCRA 192
7.2 Intervention
a. Grounds for Intervention
b. International Declarations Against
Intervention
c. Drago Doctrine and its antecedents,
Porter Resolution and other doctrines
MODULE 9: TERRITORY
9.1 Definition
a. National Territory of the Philippines
(Section 1, Article 1, Constitution)
Cases:
1) Magallona v. Ermita, 655 SCRA 476
2) Fisheries Case, ICJ Reports (1951) 116
3) In the matter of the South China Sea Arbitration
[P.C.A. 2013-19]
c. Aerial Domain
a. Exemptions
Cases:
Apr. 12-17,
Mid-Term Examinations 2021
13.2 Functions
Cases:
1) Commissioner of Customs v. Eastern Sea Trading, 3
SCRA 351
2) Pimentel v. Executive Secretary, G.R. No. 158088,
July 6, 2005
3) Tanada v. Angara, 272 SCRA 18
4) Inchong v. Hernandez, 101 Phil. 1156
5) Deutsche Bank v. CIR, August 19, 2013
6) Reagan v. CIR, G.R. No. L-226379, December 27,
1969
7) Guerrero Transport v. Blaylock, 71 SCRA 621
8) U.S.A. v. Purganan, G.R. No. 148571, December 17,
2002
9) Gonzales v. Hechanova, G.R. No. L-21897, October
22, 1963
WEEK/ LEARNING
LEARNING DATE METHODS
RESOURCES (Schedule (activities
TOPIC/CONTENT (print and non- of each designed or
(arrangement or sequence of the major topics is based print materials Topic, deployed by the
on a logical order) and online/ Assign, teacher to bring
open-access Exam for about, or create
resources) the entire the conditions
semester) for learning)
10) USAFFE v. Treasurer of the Philippines, G.R. No. L-
10500, June 30, 1959
11) Abaya v. Ebane, 515 SCRA 720
12) Bayan Muna v. Romulo, 641 SCRA 244
13) DBM v. Kolonwel Trading, 524 SCRA 591
14) Pharmaceutical and Health Care Association v.
Duque, G.R. No. 173034, October 19, 2007
15) Bayan v. Zamora, 342 SCRA 449
16) Philip Morris v. CA, 224 SCRA 756
17) Province of North Cotabato v. GRP, 568 SCRA 402
18) Abaya v. Ebdane, 515 SCRA 720
19) Santos v. Northwest Airlines, G.R. No. 101538, June
23, 1992
20) Adolfo v. CFI, 34 SCRA 166
14.6 Statelessness
a. Definition and Consequences
b. Steps Undertaken to Avoid Condition of
Statelessness (Hague Convention of 1930)
WEEK/ LEARNING
LEARNING DATE METHODS
RESOURCES (Schedule (activities
TOPIC/CONTENT (print and non- of each designed or
(arrangement or sequence of the major topics is based print materials Topic, deployed by the
on a logical order) and online/ Assign, teacher to bring
open-access Exam for about, or create
resources) the entire the conditions
semester) for learning)
c. Rights of Stateless Person (Covenant
Relating to the Status of Stateless Person)
d. Asylum, Principles
e. Refugees, Rights
Cases:
1) Noyes Case: US v. Panama, General Claims
Commission, 1933
2) Youmans Case: US v. Mexico, Opinions of the
Commission, 1927
3) Galvan Case, Mexico v US, Opinions of the
Commissioners, 1926.
4) Jane Case: US v. Mexico, Opinions of the
Commissioners, 1927.
15.9 Extradition
a. Distinguished from Deportation
b. Basis of Extradition
Cases:
a. Mediation v. Conciliation
b. Arbitration v. Judicial Settlement
c. Limitations on Jurisdiction of ICJ
WEEK/ LEARNING
LEARNING DATE METHODS
RESOURCES (Schedule (activities
TOPIC/CONTENT (print and non- of each designed or
(arrangement or sequence of the major topics is based print materials Topic, deployed by the
on a logical order) and online/ Assign, teacher to bring
open-access Exam for about, or create
resources) the entire the conditions
semester) for learning)
d. Compromissary Clause
e. Optional Jurisdiction Clause (Article 36,
Statute), Applicability
f. Retorsion v. Reprisal, Forms or Examples
Cases:
1) People v. Alvero, 86 Phil. 58
2) Laurel v. Misa, 77 Phil. 856
WEEK/ LEARNING
LEARNING DATE METHODS
RESOURCES (Schedule (activities
TOPIC/CONTENT (print and non- of each designed or
(arrangement or sequence of the major topics is based print materials Topic, deployed by the
on a logical order) and online/ Assign, teacher to bring
open-access Exam for about, or create
resources) the entire the conditions
semester) for learning)
3) Yamashita v. Styer, 75 Phil. 563
4) People v. Agoncillo, 80 Phil. 33
5) Gibbs v. Rodriguez, 84 Phil. 230
6) Co Kim Cham v. Valdez Tan Keh, 75 Phil. 113
7) People v. Godinez, 79 Phil. 775
8) Wilson v. Berkenkotter, G.R. L-4476, April 20, 1953
9) Kuroda v. Jalandoni, 83 Phil. 171
10) Raquiza v. Bradford, 75 Phil. 50
11) Haw Pia v. China Banking Corporation, 80 Phil. 604
j. Doctrine of Continuous
Voyage/Transport
k. Instances when a Vessel is liable to
condemnation for unneutral service
l. Right of Angary, Requisites
Cases:
1) Republic vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 104678, July
21, 2003
2) Marcos vs. Manglapus, G.R. No. 88211, 15
September 1989
Dissenting Opinions
Cases:
1) J. Leonen, Social Justice Society (SJS) Officers vs.
Lim, G.R. No. 187836, November 25, 2014
2) Resident Marine Mammals of the Protected Seascape
Tanon Strait, G.R. No. 180771, April 21, 2015
TEXTBOOK/REFERENCE BOOK:
POLICIES:
Prepared by:
Signature
Atty. Marciano G. Delson
Dean, College of Law