Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Evaluation of Wound Healing Potential of Cynodon Dactylon
Evaluation of Wound Healing Potential of Cynodon Dactylon
Research Article
Table 1: Composition of gel of aqueous and alcoholic extract of treated with 0.2% w/w betadine ointment, the test groups was
Cynodon dactylon treated with aqueous and alcoholic extract gel (10 % w/w and 20 %
w/w) by applying the it every day till the 16th day of wound healing.
Concentration (% w/w)
Sr.No. Ingradients The progressive changes in wound area were monitored using
10% w/w 20% w/w
1 Carbopol 940 200 mg 200 mg vernier caliper. The measurement of wound area on graph paper
2 Extract 2 gm 5 gm was expressed as unit (mm2). Wound contraction was expressed as
3 Methy paraben 0.2ml 0.2 ml percentage reduction of original wound size.
5 Glycerine 0.4 ml 0.4 ml
Incision wound healing model
6 Triethanolamine 0.2 ml 0.2 ml
7 Water q.s. q.s. This study was carried out (Figure: 1b), as described by James O, et
al. 201015. Tensile strength (the force required to open the healing
Experimental animals
skin) was used to measure the completeness of healing. Tensile
Male wistar albino rats, weighing 200-300 g, were used and housed strength of wound represents the effectiveness of wound healing.
in standard environmental conditions i.e. room temperature 22°C ± Usually wound-healing agents promote the gaining of tensile
3°C, relative humidity 50-60%. The experimental protocol was strength.
approved by the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (IAEC) of The grouping of animal was done in the same manner as excision
NMIMS, SPTM, Dhule, Maharashtra and conducted according to the model. Six groups of animals containing six in each group were
guidelines of the Committee for the Purpose of Control and
taken. The animals were anaesthetized by ketamine injection. One
Supervision of Experiments on Animals (CPCSEA).
full thickness paravertebral incision of 5 cm length was made
Excision wound healing model including the cutaneous muscles of the depilated back of each rat.
Full septic measures were not taken and no local or systemic
Excision wound healing model (figure: 1a) was performed as per antimicrobials were used throughout the experiment. After the
Mukherjee PK, et al. 200014. This model was used to monitor wound incision was made, the parted skin was kept together and stitched
contraction and epithelialisation time. The animals were divided in with sutures, 1 cm apart. The ointment of the extract, standard drug
six groups having six animals in each group as shown in Table 2. (betadine ointment) was applied to the wound of test & standard
group twice daily, until complete recovery to the respective groups
of animals. On 8th day after wounding the sutures were removed
and the tensile strength was measured on 10th day.
For measuring the tensile strength the rats were again anaesthetised
and each rat was placed on a stack of towels on the middle of the
board. The amount of the towels could be adjusted in such a way so
that the wound was on the same level as the tips of the arms. The
clamps were then carefully clamped on the skin of the opposite
edges of the wound at a distance of 0.5 cm away from the wound.
The longer pieces of the fishing line were placed on the pulley and
finally to the polyethylene bottle. The position of the board was
adjusted so that the bottle receives a rapid and constant rate of
Fig 1: (a) Excision wound and (b) Incision wound model at day 0 water from a large reservoir, until the wound began to open. The
amount of water in the polyethylene bag was weighed and equated
Table No.2: Grouping of animals and their treatment as the tensile strength of the wound. The tensile strength induced by
Group the extract and by betadine ointment treated wounds was compared
Sr. No. Treatment with the control.
(n=6)
1. Control Paraffin wax Evaluation was done by measuring wound area in mm2 in excision
2. Standard Povidone Iodine wound healing model and tensile strength measurement in incision
3. Test -1 Aqueous extract (10%) gel of C.dactylon wound healing model.
4. Test -2 Test aqueous extract (20%) gel C.dactylon
5. Test -3 Test alcoholic extract (10%) gel C.dactylon Statistical evaluation
6. Test -4 Test alcoholic extract (20%) gel
Data obtained are presented as means ± standard error of mean
All the animals were anaesthetized using ketamine hydrochoride. (S.E.M.) for the number of animals in each group (n = 6). The groups
The rats were depilated on the back and a predetermined area of were compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)
500 sq.mm of full thickness skin was excised in the dorsal inter followed by Dunnett’s test, P<0.05 was considered significant in
scapular region. Rat’s wounds were left undressed to the open excision wound healing model and P<0.01 was considered
environment for control group. The reference standard group was significant in incision wound healing model.
Table No 3: Effect of Cynodon dactylon extract and betadine on wound contraction in excision wound model
Wound area mm2 Mean (± SEM)
Group
0th day 4th day 8th day 10th day 12th day 14th day 16th day
496.4 469.13 417.63 333.13 271.6** 198.36* 170.66*
Control
(± 2.88) (± 3.92) (± 2.75) (± 2.94) (± 2.28) (± 3.57) (± 4.10)
528.26 470.16 310.66** 238.46** 149.43** 89.3** 26.23**
Standard
(± 3.43) (± 2.65) (± 4.39) (± 3.63) (± 4.35) (± 1.26) (± 1.44)
513.26 483.5 333.8** 249.5** 170.46* 102.53** 74.56**
Test aqueous 10%
(± 2.66) (± 3.45) (± 2.45) (± 4.56) (± 4.23) (± 2.63) (± 1.70)
502.6 463.56 315.13** 229.5** 157.4** 89.53* 52.23**
Test aqueous 20%
(± 2.63) (± 3.71) (± 0.99) (± 4.65) (± 3.40) (± 2.18) (± 3.61)
507.26 473.5 323.8** 239.5** 160.46* 96.2** 54.56**
Test alcoholic 10%
(± 2.66) (± 3.45) (± 2.45) (± 4.56) (± 4.23) (± 2.63) (± 1.70)
504.6 463.56 315.13** 229.5* 154.4** 92.53** 41.23**
Test alcoholic 20%
(± 2.63) (± 3.71) (± 0.99) (± 4.65) (± 3.40) (± 2.18) (± 3.61)
162
Dande et al.
Asian J Pharm Clin Res, Vol 5, Suppl 3, 2012, 161-164
163
Dande et al.
Asian J Pharm Clin Res, Vol 5, Suppl 3, 2012, 161-164
164