Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T
Keywords: Here, we demonstrate that the two distinct formulations of our anti-sepsis drug candidate Rejuveinix (RJX), have
Cancer a very favorable safety profile in Wistar Albino rats at dose levels comparable to the projected clinical dose levels.
Sepsis 14-day treatment with RJX-P (RJX PPP.18.1051) or RJX-B (RJX-B200702-CLN) similarly elevated the day 15
Pneumonia
tissue levels of the antioxidant enzyme superoxide dismutase (SOD) as well as ascorbic acid in both the lungs and
ARDS
Acute lung injury (ALI)
liver in a dose-dependent fashion. The activity of SOD and ascorbic acid levels were significantly higher in tissues
Multi-organ dysfunction (MODS) of RJX-P or RJX-B treated rats than vehicle-treated control rats (p < 0.0001). There was no statistically signif
Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) icant difference between tissue SOD activity or ascorbic acid levels of rats treated with RJX-P vs. rats treated with
COVID-19 RJX-B (p > 0.05). The observed elevations of the SOD and ascorbic acid levels were transient and were no longer
detectable on day 28 following a 14-day recovery period. These results demonstrate that RJX-P and RJX-B are
bioequivalent relative to their pharmacodynamic effects on tissue SOD and ascorbic acid levels. Furthermore,
both formulations showed profound protective activity in a mouse model of sepsis. In agreement with the PD
evaluations in rats and their proposed mechanism of action, both RJX-P and RJX-B exhibited near-identical
potent and dose-dependent anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory activity in the LPS-GalN model of ARDS and
multi-organ failure in mice.
1. Introduction two-part, ascending dose-escalation study that evaluated its safety and
tolerability in healthy volunteers (Protocol No. RPI003; ClinicalTrials.
Sepsis represents a strong inflammatory response to an infection with gov Identifier: NCT03680105) [3]. No deaths, serious adverse events
a potentially fatal outcome due to its complications, including acute (SAEs), or Grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) were observed in any of 57
respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), septic shock, multiple organ healthy volunteers treated with RJX at dose levels ranging from 0.024
dysfunction syndrome (MODS), and disseminated intravascular coa mL/kg to 0.759 mL/kg [3].
gulopathy. Our anti-sepsis drug candidate, Rejuveinix (RJX), is a ratio The primary objective of the present non-clinical study was to
nally designed formulation of naturally occurring antioxidants and anti- compare the toxicity profiles and pharmacodynamics features of two
inflammatory compounds, and it is being evaluated for its clinical formulations of RJX that are in clinical development using Wistar Albino
impact potential for COVID-19 associated viral sepsis in a placebo- rats.
controlled, double-blind Phase II study RPI015 [1–3]. The composi
tion, mode of action, and recently published favorable clinical safety
profile of RJX [1–3] make it an attractive anti-inflammatory drug
candidate for the prevention and treatment of sepsis. We recently
completed a Phase 1, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized,
* Corresponding author at: Drug Discovery Program, Reven Pharmaceuticals, Westminster, CO 80234, USA.
E-mail addresses: fatih.uckun@reven.com (F.M. Uckun), corhan@firat.edu.tr (C. Orhan), joy.powell@reven.com (J. Powell), esahin@bingol.edu.tr (E. Sahin),
ozercanih@firat.edu.tr (I.H. Ozercan), michael.volk@reven.com (M. Volk), ksahin@firat.edu.tr (K. Sahin).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111823
Received 1 January 2021; Received in revised form 25 May 2021; Accepted 11 June 2021
Available online 17 June 2021
0753-3322/© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
F.M. Uckun et al. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 141 (2021) 111823
2
F.M. Uckun et al. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 141 (2021) 111823
Table 3
Composition of Vial B (Formulation RJX-P = RJX PPP.18.1051).
Test Specification Test results
Notes: RJX = Rejuveinix; USP = United States Pharmacopeia; EU = endotoxin Units; MVD = maximum valid dilution.
Table 4
Composition of Vial B (Formulation RJX-B = RJX-B200702-CLN).
Test Specification Test results
Notes: RJX = Rejuveinix; USP = United States Pharmacopeia; EU = endotoxin Units; MVD = maximum valid dilution.
Lot number RJX- RJX- RJX- RJX- RJX-P RJX-B 2.3.2. Test system justification for toxicity studies
P B P B
According to the European Medicines Agency, the rat is a standard
Ascorbic Acid 9.011 7.751 90.11 77.51 45.055 38.755 rodent species for general toxicity study [4]. Intraperitoneal dosing
Thiamine 0.643 0.547 6.43 5.47 3.215 2.735
achieves the expected systemic exposure of the drug for toxicity evalu
Magnesium Sulfate 8.176 6.867 81.76 68.67 40.88 34.335
Cyanocobalamin 0.019 0.017 0.19 0.17 0.095 0.085
ation. The number of animals per group (5/sex/group) was the minimal
Niacinamide 1.186 1.017 11.86 10.17 5.93 5.085 number for each cohort, allowing for sufficient data point collection and
Pyridoxine 1.191 1.025 11.91 10.25 5.955 5.125 statistical analysis of several endpoints to determine systemic effects [4].
Riboflavin 0.025 0.022 0.25 0.22 0.125 0.11 The experimental design for each cohort group was explained in detail in
5′ Phosphate
Table 7.
Calcium D- 0.028 0.023 0.28 0.23 0.14 0.115
Pantothenate
3
F.M. Uckun et al. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 141 (2021) 111823
Table 7
Experimental design for each cohort.
Group Dose assignment Number of animals Dose Conc. (mg/mL) Dose level (mL/kg/day) Dose volume (mL/animal/day)/Administration route
Notes: RJX = Rejuveinix; M = male; F = female; Conc. = concentration, i.p. = intraperitoneally NS = normal saline, RJX-P = RJX PPP.18.1051, RJX-B = RJX-B200702-
CLN. * The test article is a solution formulated with multiple components of varying content concentration levels, at fixed ratios. See Tables 1 and 2 for details of target
formulation content.
Fig. 1. Effects of treatment with RJX-P or RJX-B via intraperitoneal injections on body weight of Wistar albino rats (Panel A: Male, Panel B: Female). Groups of 20
Wistar albino rats were treated with i.p injections of RJX-P (1.25 and 2.50 mL/kg/day) or RJX-B (1.25 and 2.50 mL/kg/day) or vehicle (NS) for 14 days. Groups of 10
animals in cohort 1 were sacrificed on day 15, while groups of 10 animals in cohort 2 sacrificed on day 28 following a 2 week recovery period. The bar represents
mean and SEM. ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test were used to compare the results among different treatment groups.
2.4. Biochemical analysis hemoglobin (Hb) content were determined using an Exigo Hematology
Analyzer (Exigo Boule. Medical AB, Stockholm). For biochemical ana
Blood was collected into serum-separating tubes after decapitation lyses, the blood samples of all rats were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10
by cervical dislocation. For the hematological parameters, the blood min, and obtained serums were stored at − 80 ◦ C until analysis day.
samples were collected in EDTA coated vials and analyzed for red blood Serum concentrations of glucose, total protein (TP), albumin (ALB),
cells (RBCs) count, white blood cells (WBCs) count, platelet count, and globulin (GLB), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine
4
F.M. Uckun et al. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 141 (2021) 111823
Table 8
Effects of 14-day treatment with RJX-P or RJX-B via intraperitoneal injections on safety pharmacology laboratory parameters of Wistar albino rats.
Parameters Control (NS) RJX-P (0.5 mL) RJX-P (0.25 mL) RJX-B (0.5 mL) RJX-B (0.25 mL)
Glucose, mg/dL M 116.60 ± 3.67 115.60 ± 4.80 115.40 ± 3.01 117.20 ± 4.33 119.20 ± 3.76
F 123.00 ± 3.35 120.20 ± 3.38 118.20 ± 3.64 119.20 ± 3.6 114.60 ± 2.38
BUN, mg/dL M 20.04 ± 1.14 22.52 ± 0.78 23.56 ± 1.14 21.82 ± 0.62 22.82 ± 0.87
F 22.76 ± 1.28 22.96 ± 0.93 22.44 ± 0.84 24.90 ± 1.63 21.58 ± 0.53
TP, g/dL M 7.06 ± 0.31 7.78 ± 0.08 7.20 ± 0.36 7.54 ± 0.18 7.48 ± 0.07
F 7.28 ± 0.35 7.58 ± 0.11 7.78 ± 0.35 7.66 ± 0.21 7.50 ± 0.14
ALB, g/dL M 3.44 ± 0.07 3.64 ± 0.07 3.34 ± 0.08 3.62 ± 0.13 3.48 ± 0.10
F 4.08 ± 0.08 3.72 ± 0.07 3.96 ± 0.11 3.74 ± 0.12 3.70 ± 0.09
GLOB, g/dL M 3.62 ± 0.19 3.80 ± 0.23 3.42 ± 0.14 3.64 ± 0.07 3.70 ± 0.08
F 3.82 ± 0.15 3.88 ± 0.12 4.12 ± 0.22 3.98 ± 0.06 3.78 ± 0.08
ALT, U/L M 127.20 ± 6.46 135.80 ± 4.92 128.60 ± 1.44 144.00 ± 3.78 134.40 ± 5.53
F 123.80 ± 7.16 130.80 ± 5.39 134.40 ± 2.66 117.00 ± 2.63 136.00 ± 4.70
AST, U/L M 151.40 ± 7.49 162.20 ± 7.61 133.20 ± 3.76 147.80 ± 22.65 151.00 ± 4.93
F 137.60 ± 11.60 163.00 ± 7.16 167.00 ± 2.55 161.80 ± 17.01 178.20 ± 14.29
ALP, U/L M 258.60 ± 10.58 274.00 ± 18.8 253.60 ± 10.82 273.40 ± 13.17 265.60 ± 8.45
F 265.00 ± 16.06 267.00 ± 16.64 274.20 ± 5.77 261.00 ± 14.74 219.00 ± 16.81
TBIL, mg/dL M 0.24 ± 0.02 0.22 ± 0.01 0.22 ± 0.01 0.27 ± 0.01 0.26 ± 0.01
F 0.22 ± 0.03 0.21 ± 0.003 0.23 ± 0.03 0.22 ± 0.01 0.19 ± 0.01
Creatinine, mg/dL M 37.80 ± 1.80 39.00 ± 1.26 36.20 ± 1.43 38.40 ± 1.44 38.80 ± 0.97
F 35.60 ± 1.44 37.20 ± 1.53 35.80 ± 0.66 39.00 ± 1.67 38.80 ± 0.73
WBC(x103/µL) M 12.08 ± 2.15 10.30 ± 1.59 11.98 ± 1.13 10.96 ± 0.72 10.86 ± 0.31
F 9.62 ± 1.44 9.24 ± 0.66 12.76 ± 1.75 11.70 ± 1.28 9.40 ± 0.57
ALC(x103/µL) M 8.32 ± 1.06 7.40 ± 1.26 8.18 ± 0.73 7.52 ± 0.51 7.00 ± 0.43
F 6.80 ± 1.53 6.52 ± 0.49 9.62 ± 1.48 8.20 ± 0.55 7.18 ± 0.46
MON#(x103/µL) M 0.70 ± 0.11 0.68 ± 0.10 0.80 ± 0.06 0.54 ± 0.02 0.72 ± 0.08
F 0.64 ± 0.18 0.48 ± 0.10 0.70 ± 0.04 0.58 ± 0.04 0.42 ± 0.04
ANC (x103/µL) M 3.00 ± 0.41 1.88 ± 0.31 2.68 ± 0.40 2.48 ± 0.18 2.76 ± 0.43
F 1.38 ± 0.27 1.86 ± 0.12 1.94 ± 0.26 2.46 ± 0.84 1.14 ± 0.12
EOS#(x103/µL) M 0.54 ± 0.13 0.34 ± 0.10 0.32 ± 0.05 0.42 ± 0.05 0.38 ± 0.06
F 0.32 ± 0.14 0.38 ± 0.09 0.50 ± 0.14 0.46 ± 0.08 0.66 ± 0.17
LYM% M 68.40 ± 3.01 71.08 ± 1.54 68.90 ± 2.03 68.40 ± 1.28 64.76 ± 4.27
F 71.76 ± 3.39 70.62 ± 1.54 74.92 ± 1.80 71.74 ± 3.93 76.20 ± 0.77
MON% M 6.18 ± 0.59 6.36 ± 0.41 6.14 ± 0.40 4.96 ± 0.21 6.22 ± 0.58
F 5.20 ± 0.47 4.54 ± 0.71 5.48 ± 0.47 4.60 ± 0.3 4.26 ± 0.16
NEU% M 21.46 ± 2.73 18.74 ± 0.93 22.24 ± 1.51 22.72 ± 0.82 25.46 ± 3.54
F 19.42 ± 2.63 20.78 ± 1.86 15.70 ± 1.56 19.88 ± 4.42 12.82 ± 1.26
EOS% M 3.96 ± 0.72 3.82 ± 1.18 2.72 ± 0.45 3.92 ± 0.34 3.56 ± 0.54
F 3.62 ± 1.73 4.06 ± 0.64 3.90 ± 0.89 3.78 ± 0.65 6.72 ± 1.55
RBC (x106/µL) M 7.77 ± 0.23 8.65 ± 0.12 7.44 ± 0.65 8.43 ± 0.07 8.38 ± 0.23
F 7.89 ± 0.24 7.40 ± 0.29 7.94 ± 0.22 7.24 ± 0.84 8.11 ± 0.10
HGB, g/dL M 17.08 ± 0.65 15.92 ± 2.10 15.42 ± 1.13 17.76 ± 0.22 17.32 ± 0.46
F 16.36 ± 0.34 16.34 ± 0.33 16.92 ± 0.59 15.46 ± 1.72 17.4 ± 0.16
HCT, % M 50.86 ± 1.60 51.92 ± 1.11 46.94 ± 1.55 48.36 ± 0.83 52.04 ± 3.14
F 46.12 ± 1.19 46.62 ± 0.46 47.86 ± 1.32 44.06 ± 5.16 49.82 ± 0.55
MCV, fL M 65.56 ± 2.26 59.96 ± 0.62 64.58 ± 4.53 57.32 ± 0.56 62.42 ± 4.86
F 58.52 ± 1.32 63.42 ± 2.89 60.34 ± 1.24 60.82 ± 0.81 61.46 ± 0.80
MCH, pg M 21.98 ± 0.38 20.66 ± 0.20 20.86 ± 0.39 21.04 ± 0.09 20.70 ± 0.45
F 20.76 ± 0.35 22.14 ± 0.54 21.34 ± 0.39 21.46 ± 0.33 21.44 ± 0.20
MCHC, g/Dl M 33.72 ± 1.48 34.50 ± 0.22 32.70 ± 1.57 36.70 ± 0.22 33.88 ± 2.42
F 35.54 ± 0.3 35.08 ± 0.93 35.42 ± 1.14 35.28 ± 0.38 34.90 ± 0.13
RDWa, fL M 47.84 ± 3.79 42.56 ± 0.54 53.04 ± 5.33 45.04 ± 3.96 49.70 ± 6.11
F 39.84 ± 1.25 46.38 ± 4.54 43.94 ± 2.80 44.16 ± 1.87 41.42 ± 0.47
RDW, % M 17.02 ± 0.62 16.96 ± 0.22 18.20 ± 0.40 16.34 ± 0.07 17.12 ± 0.53
F 16.24 ± 0.17 17.14 ± 0.82 16.90 ± 0.38 16.50 ± 0.29 15.82 ± 0.15
PLT(x103/µL) M 672.20 ± 49.23 770.00 ± 96.55 699.00 ± 64.86 684.40 ± 55.26 689.60 ± 41.66
F 774.00 ± 56.95 835.00 ± 56.50 875.40 ± 57.45 760.40 ± 59.12 756.6 ± 25.51
MPV, fL M 6.62 ± 0.02 6.60 ± 0.07 6.28 ± 0.18 6.64 ± 0.12 6.48 ± 0.11
F 6.90 ± 0.2 6.52 ± 0.06 6.82 ± 0.18 6.88 ± 0.26 6.84 ± 0.20
Notes: Data show the mean ± SEM values for the depicted laboratory parameters. ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test were used for comparing the results among
different treatment groups. M: Male, F: Female, RJX: Rejuveinix, RJX-P: RJX PPP.18.1051, RJX-B: RJX-B200702-CLN, BUN: blood urea nitrogen, TP: total protein,
ALB: albumin, GLOB: globulin, ALT: alanine aminotransferase, AST: aspartate aminotransferase, ALP: alkaline phosphatase, TBIL: total bilirubin, WBC: white blood
cell count, ALC: absolute lymphocyte count, MON: monocytes, ANC: absolute neutrophil count, EOS: eosinophil, LYM: lymphocytes, NEU: neutrophils, RBC: red blood
cell, HGB: hemoglobin, HCT: hematocrit, MCV: mean corpuscular volume, MCH: mean corpuscular hemoglobin, MCHC: mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration,
RDW: red cell distribution width, PLT: platelet, MPV: mean platelet volume.
5
F.M. Uckun et al. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 141 (2021) 111823
Table 9
Effects of 14-day treatment with RJX-P or RJX-B via intraperitoneal injections followed by a 14-day recovery period on safety pharmacology laboratory parameters of
Wistar albino rats.
Parameters Control (NS) RJX-P (0.5 mL) RJX-P (0.25 mL) RJX-B (0.5 mL) RJX-B (0.25 mL)
Glucose, mg/dL M 113.60 ± 2.86 113.40 ± 3.40 115.60 ± 3.25 111.60 ± 3.40 115.80 ± 3.64
F 117.00 ± 2.79 116.00 ± 3.27 115.20 ± 2.65 114.60 ± 2.79 115.00 ± 3.39
BUN, mg/dL MF 21.58 ± 1.36 21.94 ± 0.52 22.30 ± 1.05 23.52 ± 0.89 22.92 ± 0.74
20.98 ± 1.04 24.06 ± 0.4 23.80 ± 1.14 23.56 ± 0.57 21.92 ± 0.52
TP, g/dL MF 6.86 ± 0.23 7.34 ± 0.18 6.76 ± 0.18 7.02 ± 0.21 7.18 ± 0.15
7.06 ± 0.28 7.42 ± 0.23 7.72 ± 0.19 7.48 ± 0.15 7.28 ± 0.17
ALB, g/dL MF 3.82 ± 0.18 3.52 ± 0.10 3.36 ± 0.12 3.68 ± 0.09 3.56 ± 0.12
3.90 ± 0.15 3.42 ± 0.11 3.66 ± 0.13 3.72 ± 0.09 3.54 ± 0.11
GLOB, g/dL M 3.48 ± 0.19 3.78 ± 0.14 3.54 ± 0.13 3.66 ± 0.05 3.58 ± 0.09
F 3.74 ± 0.14 3.68 ± 0.09 3.82 ± 0.16 3.80 ± 0.12 3.68 ± 0.09
ALT, U/L M 117.20 ± 6.87 137.60 ± 2.20 125.60 ± 3.19 125.80 ± 3.83 130.80 ± 3.38
F 112.80 ± 6.75 132.00 ± 3.46 134.00 ± 3.7 122.20 ± 5.42 131.80 ± 2.29
AST, U/L M 144.40 ± 2.20 162.20 ± 7.61 164.20 ± 11.36 163.60 ± 10.29 180.00 ± 12.34
F 146.40 ± 6.44 183.80 ± 6.38 183.40 ± 9.17 177.80 ± 22.83 186.00 ± 11.87
ALP, U/L M 251.00 ± 6.92 262.20 ± 8.91 302.20 ± 5.86 296.00 ± 17.74 263.00 ± 9.57
F 256.00 ± 6.87 295.00 ± 10.58 268.20 ± 5.68 250.60 ± 11.35 249.80 ± 12.34
TBIL, mg/dL M 0.24 ± 0.01 0.22 ± 0.01 0.23 ± 0.01 0.26 ± 0.01 0.26 ± 0.01
F 0.20 ± 0.01 0.22 ± 0.01 0.23 ± 0.01 0.23 ± 0.003 0.22 ± 0.01
Creatinine, mg/dL M 38.00 ± 1.45 38.40 ± 1.12 36.20 ± 1.11 40.20 ± 0.92 39.20 ± 1.11
F 39.80 ± 1.11 40.80 ± 0.73 36.00 ± 1.05 38.80 ± 0.86 38.40 ± 1.12
WBC(x103/µL) M 14.06 ± 0.82 12.16 ± 1.72 12.02 ± 0.95 10.80 ± 1.93 10.86 ± 0.69
F 9.16 ± 1.17 8.38 ± 1.07 8.54 ± 1.46 10.08 ± 1.42 8.58 ± 0.43
ALC(x103/µL) M 9.26 ± 0.63 8.94 ± 1.40 8.20 ± 0.55 7.87 ± 1.69 7.26 ± 0.69
F 6.40 ± 0.62 5.98 ± 0.80 6.46 ± 1.22 7.33 ± 1.19 6.33 ± 0.28
MON#(x103/µL) M 0.86 ± 0.10 0.70 ± 0.08 0.82 ± 0.07 0.67 ± 0.09 0.70 ± 0.06
F 0.50 ± 0.09 0.50 ± 0.05 0.50 ± 0.06 0.55 ± 0.05 0.43 ± 0.06
ANC (x103/µL) M 3.46 ± 0.39 2.24 ± 0.34 2.50 ± 0.35 1.87 ± 0.15 2.48 ± 0.39
F 1.86 ± 0.60 1.84 ± 0.32 1.30 ± 0.20 1.65 ± 0.34 1.43 ± 0.23
EOS#(x103/µL) M 0.48 ± 0.11 0.28 ± 0.14 0.50 ± 0.09 0.40 ± 0.06 0.42 ± 0.06
F 0.40 ± 0.09 0.35 ± 0.14 0.28 ± 0.07 0.55 ± 0.05 0.40 ± 0.12
LYM% M 66.02 ± 2.20 72.92 ± 1.53 68.62 ± 1.06 71.93 ± 2.40 66.64 ± 3.87
F 70.74 ± 2.83 71.06 ± 2.01 75.14 ± 1.67 72.10 ± 3.51 74.18 ± 3.48
MON% M 5.68 ± 0.38 5.54 ± 0.46 6.34 ± 0.20 5.70 ± 0.85 6.06 ± 0.47
F 5.28 ± 0.21 5.84 ± 0.36 5.36 ± 0.60 5.23 ± 0.43 4.65 ± 0.43
NEU% M 24.88 ± 2.44 18.76 ± 0.64 20.74 ± 1.50 18.07 ± 1.56 23.18 ± 3.52
F 19.42 ± 3.29 22.64 ± 1.82 15.74 ± 1.4 16.63 ± 3.26 16.63 ± 2.16
EOS% M 3.42 ± 0.78 2.78 ± 1.68 4.30 ± 0.79 4.30 ± 0.45 4.12 ± 0.45
F 4.56 ± 1.27 3.48 ± 1.77 3.76 ± 0.62 6.05 ± 0.63 4.55 ± 1.14
RBC (x106/µL) M 7.81 ± 0.23 8.71 ± 0.06 7.47 ± 0.64 7.97 ± 0.5 7.98 ± 0.51
F 7.24 ± 0.44 7.46 ± 0.40 8.02 ± 0.09 7.70 ± 0.52 8.36 ± 0.12
HGB, g/dL M 17.32 ± 0.65 18.74 ± 0.21 15.66 ± 1.15 17.03 ± 1.08 16.58 ± 0.95
F 15.14 ± 0.95 16.22 ± 0.67 17.28 ± 0.31 16.55 ± 0.73 17.23 ± 0.23
HCT, % M 50.74 ± 2.06 53.22 ± 0.71 48.88 ± 1.89 51.43 ± 0.82 52.74 ± 1.83
F 43.82 ± 0.92 45.70 ± 1.93 48.44 ± 0.96 46.55 ± 1.99 48.63 ± 0.84
MCV, fL M 65.14 ± 2.91 61.04 ± 0.63 66.70 ± 4.05 65.07 ± 4.91 66.96 ± 4.29
F 61.26 ± 3.37 61.56 ± 1.64 60.34 ± 0.58 60.85 ± 1.91 58.23 ± 1.47
MCH, pg M 22.18 ± 0.38 21.52 ± 0.25 21.06 ± 0.36 21.4 ± 0.23 20.82 ± 0.41
F 20.90 ± 0.20 21.84 ± 0.56 21.56 ± 0.16 21.63 ± 0.67 20.58 ± 0.38
MCHC, g/Dl M 34.34 ± 1.74 35.22 ± 0.27 31.94 ± 1.38 33.23 ± 2.32 31.60 ± 1.95
F 34.44 ± 1.69 35.5 ± 0.14 35.68 ± 0.14 35.55 ± 0.18 35.40 ± 0.25
RDWa, fL M 47.82 ± 4.81 43.4 ± 0.98 56.28 ± 4.84 50.87 ± 8.56 50.64 ± 5.11
F 44.12 ± 5.12 44.96 ± 3.43 41.72 ± 0.56 43.43 ± 2.88 39.38 ± 0.91
RDW, % M 17.10 ± 0.74 16.82 ± 0.33 20.00 ± 0.82 18.30 ± 1.65 17.34 ± 0.41
F 16.90 ± 0.82 17.24 ± 0.83 16.36 ± 0.17 16.83 ± 0.46 16.08 ± 0.19
PLT(x103/µL) M 681.20 ± 54.81 776.80 ± 88.9 713.20 ± 79.21 732.33 ± 116.09 719.40 ± 48.20
F 823.40 ± 86.31 801.8 ± 69.1 892.6 ± 26.41 1026.75 ± 60.18 956.5 ± 70.71
MPV, fL M 6.48 ± 0.04 6.60 ± 0.21 7.24 ± 0.25 7.03 ± 0.36 6.84 ± 0.09
F 6.78 ± 0.1 6.96 ± 0.23 6.48 ± 0.05 6.85 ± 0.27 6.90 ± 0.19
Notes: Data show the mean ± SEM values for the depicted laboratory parameters. ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test were used for comparing the results among
different treatment groups. M: Male, F: Female, RJX: Rejuveinix, RJX-P: RJX PPP.18.1051, RJX-B: RJX-B200702-CLN, BUN: blood urea nitrogen, TP: total protein,
ALB: albumin, GLOB: globulin, ALT: alanine aminotransferase, AST: aspartate aminotransferase, ALP: alkaline phosphatase, TBIL: total bilirubin, WBC: white blood
cell count, ALC: absolute lymphocyte count, MON: monocytes, ANC: absolute neutrophil count, EOS: eosinophil, LYM: lymphocytes, NEU: neutrophils, RBC: red blood
cell, HGB: hemoglobin, HCT: hematocrit, MCV: mean corpuscular volume, MCH: mean corpuscular hemoglobin, MCHC: mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration,
RDW: red cell distribution width, PLT: platelet, MPV: mean platelet volume.
6
F.M. Uckun et al. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 141 (2021) 111823
Table 10
Histopathology findings in Wistar albino rats treated with 14 days of RJX-P or RJX-B via intraperitoneal injections. Use summary table.
Treatment Normal Saline RJX-P RJX-P RJX-B RJX-B
Treatment Dose 0.5 mL (~2.5 mL/kg) 0.5 mL (~2.5 mL/kg) 0.25 mL (~1.25 mL/kg) 0.5 mL (~2.5 mL/kg) 0.25 mL (~1.25 mL/kg)
Time of Sacrifice (in days) 15 15 15 15 15
#Rats/Group 10 10 10 10 10
Tissues No. Exam % No. Exam % No. Exam % No. Exam. % No. Exam. %
Liver
Within normal limits 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100
Not examined 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Notable or abnormal 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Pale liver 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Lung
Within normal limits 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100
Not examined 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Notable or abnormal 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Congestion and atelectasis 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Hemorrhage and localized lesions 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Atelectasis 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Hemorrhage 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Kidney
Within normal limits 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100
Not examined 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Notable or abnormal 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Spleen
Within normal limits 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100
Not examined 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Notable or abnormal 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Splenomegaly 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Heart
Within normal limits 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100
Not examined 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Notable or abnormal 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Pancreas
Within normal limits 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100
Not examined 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Notable or abnormal 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Brain
Within normal limits 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100
Not examined 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Notable or abnormal 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Cerebellum
Within normal limits 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100
Not examined 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Notable or abnormal 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Intestine, Large
Within normal limits 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100
Not examined 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Notable or abnormal 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Intestine, Small
Within normal limits 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100
Not examined 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Notable or abnormal 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Stomach
Within normal limits 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100
Not examined 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Notable or abnormal 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Testes
Within normal limits 5/5 100 5/5 100 5/5 100 5/5 100 5/5 100
Not examined 0/5 0 0/5 0 0/5 0 0/5 0 0/5 0
Notable or abnormal 0/5 0 0/5 0 0/5 0 0/5 0 0/5 0
Uterus
Within normal limits 5/5 100 5/5 100 5/5 100 5/5 100 5/5 100
Not examined 0/5 0 0/5 0 0/5 0 0/5 0 0/5 0
Notable or abnormal 0/5 0 0/5 0 0/5 0 0/5 0 0/5 0
Skeletal Muscle
Within normal limits 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100
Not examined 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Notable or abnormal 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Skin
Within normal limits 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100
Not examined 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Notable or abnormal 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
7
F.M. Uckun et al. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 141 (2021) 111823
Table 11
Day 28 Histopathology findings in Wistar albino rats treated with 14 days of RJX-P or RJX-B via intraperitoneal injections followed by a 14-day recovery period.
Treatment Normal Saline RJX-P RJX-P RJX-B RJX-B
Treatment Dose 0.5 mL (~2.5 mL/kg) 0.5 mL (~2.5 mL/kg) 0.25 mL (~1.25 mL/kg) 0.5 mL (~2.5 mL/kg) 0.25 mL (~1.25 mL/kg)
Time of Sacrifice (in days) 28 28 28 28 28
#Rats/Group 10 10 10 10 10
Tissues No. Exam % No. Exam % No. Exam % No. Exam. % No. Exam. %
Liver
Within normal limits 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100
Not examined 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Notable or abnormal 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Pale liver 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Lung
Within normal limits 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100
Not examined 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Notable or abnormal 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Congestion and atelectasis 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Hemorrhage and localized lesions 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Atelectasis 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Hemorrhage 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Kidney
Within normal limits 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100
Not examined 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Notable or abnormal 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Spleen
Within normal limits 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100
Not examined 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Notable or abnormal 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Splenomegaly 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Heart
Within normal limits 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100
Not examined 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Notable or abnormal 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Pancreas
Within normal limits 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100
Not examined 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Notable or abnormal 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Brain
Within normal limits 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100
Not examined 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Notable or abnormal 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Cerebellum
Within normal limits 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100
Not examined 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Notable or abnormal 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Intestine, Large
Within normal limits 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100
Not examined 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Notable or abnormal 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Intestine, Small
Within normal limits 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100
Not examined 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Notable or abnormal 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Stomach
Within normal limits 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100
Not examined 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Notable or abnormal 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Testes
Within normal limits 5/5 100 5/5 100 5/5 100 5/5 100 5/5 100
Not examined 0/5 0 0/5 0 0/5 0 0/5 0 0/5 0
Notable or abnormal 0/5 0 0/5 0 0/5 0 0/5 0 0/5 0
Uterus
Within normal limits 5/5 100 5/5 100 5/5 100 5/5 100 5/5 100
Not examined 0/5 0 0/5 0 0/5 0 0/5 0 0/5 0
Notable or abnormal 0/5 0 0/5 0 0/5 0 0/5 0 0/5 0
Skeletal Muscle
Within normal limits 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100
Not examined 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Notable or abnormal 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Skin
Within normal limits 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100 10/10 100
Not examined 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
Notable or abnormal 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0 0/10 0
8
F.M. Uckun et al. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 141 (2021) 111823
Fig. 2. The day-15 histopathology of liver tissue in rats treated with 14 days of RJX-P or RJX-B via intraperitoneal injections. Groups of 10 Wistar albino rats were
treated with i.p injections of RJX-P (1.25 and 2.50 mL/kg/day) or RJX-B (1.25 and 2.50 mL/kg/day), or vehicle (NS) for 14 days. Animals were sacrificed on day 15
for histopathologic examinations. No toxic lesions were detected. H&E, 200x.
Fig. 3. The day-15 histopathology of lung tissue in rats treated with 14 days of RJX-P or RJX-B via intraperitoneal injections. Groups of 10 Wistar albino rats were
treated with i.p injections of RJX-P (1.25 and 2.50 mL/kg/day) or RJX-B (1.25 and 2.50 mL/kg/day), or vehicle (NS) for 14 days. Animals were sacrificed on day 15
for histopathologic examinations. No toxic lesions were detected. H&E, 400x.
9
F.M. Uckun et al. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 141 (2021) 111823
Fig. 4. The day-15 histopathology of kidney tissue in rats treated with 14 days of RJX-P or RJX-B via intraperitoneal injections. Groups of 10 Wistar albino rats were
treated with i.p injections of RJX-P (1.25 and 2.50 mL/kg/day) or RJX-B (1.25 and 2.50 mL/kg/day), or vehicle (NS) for 14 days. Animals were sacrificed on day 15
for histopathologic examinations. No toxic lesions were detected. H&E, 200x.
Fig. 5. The day-15 histopathology of heart tissue in rats treated with 14 days of RJX-P or RJX-B via intraperitoneal injections. Groups of 10 Wistar albino rats were
treated with i.p injections of RJX-P (1.25 and 2.50 mL/kg/day) or RJX-B (1.25 and 2.50 mL/kg/day), or vehicle (NS) for 14 days. Animals were sacrificed on day 15
for histopathologic examinations. No toxic lesions were detected. H&E, 400x.
10
F.M. Uckun et al. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 141 (2021) 111823
Fig. 6. The day-15 histopathology of brain tissue in rats treated with 14 days of RJX-P or RJX-B via intraperitoneal injections. Groups of 10 Wistar albino rats were
treated with i.p injections of RJX-P (1.25 and 2.50 mL/kg/day) or RJX-B (1.25 and 2.50 mL/kg/day), or vehicle (NS) for 14 days. Animals were sacrificed on day 15
for histopathologic examinations. No toxic lesions were detected. H&E, 200x.
aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and total bilirubin after sacrifice for gross pathological and histopathological examina
(TBIL), blood urea-N (BUN) were assayed using an automated chemistry tions. Organs were preserved in 10% neutral phosphate-buffered
analyzer (Samsung LABGEO PT10, Samsung Electronics Co., Suwon, formalin and processed for histologic sectioning. For histopathologic
Korea). Tissue activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD), and tissue studies, formalin-fixed tissues were dehydrated and embedded in
ascorbic acid levels were also determined to examine the effects of RJX- paraffin by routine methods. Glass slides with affixed 4–5 µm tissue
P and RJX-B. To determine SOD levels, the tissues (liver and lung) were sections were prepared and stained with hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E).
homogenized in 10 mL cold buffer (20 mM HEPES, 1 mM EGTA, 210 mM Sections were examined by light microscopy with an Olympus BX-51
mannitol, and 70 mM sucrose) and centrifuged in a refrigerated microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
centrifuge at 4 ◦ C, 1500 rpm for 5 min. The activities of superoxide
dismutase (SOD) were determined by using a commercially available 2.6. Statistical analysis
SOD assay kit (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, Catalog No:
706002) according to the manufacturer’s instruction via a microplate The sample size was figured out by the G* Power program (Version
reader (Bio-Tek Elx800 Universal, Bio-Tek Instruments, Inc, Winooski, 3.1.9.2) with alpha error 0.05% and 89% power with effect size 0.40.
USA) [3]. The intra- and inter assays coefficients of variation were 3.2% Shapiro-Wilk test was performed for normality with a significance level
and 3.7%. For the determination of ascorbic acid levels, tissue samples of 0.05. Levene’s test was performed for homogeneity with a signifi
were homogenized KCl (1.15%). Homogenate (0.2 mL) was mixed with cance level of 0.05. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was per
five-fold 80 mM Tris-maleate buffer. Then 400 µL of ascorbic acid and formed and Tukey’s multiple comparisons were used as a post hoc test to
400 µL of iron(II) sulfate were added, incubated in a 37 ◦ C water bath. detect alterations among the groups using the SPSS statistical program
Subsequently, 26 mM thiobarbituric acid, 0.92 M trichloroacetic acid, (IBM, SPPS Version 21). P-values <0.05 were considered significant.
and 0. 8 mM hydrochloric acid were added into the mixture and held for GraphPad Prism Software (8.02, La Jolla, CA, USA) was used for
approximately 15 min in boiling water. Ascorbic acid concentrations generating the graphs.
measured by HPLC system (Shimadzu UV–VIS SPD-10 AVP detector
equipped with CTO-10 AS VP column). The mobile phase was KH2 PO4
+methanol (82.5% + 17.5%), and the flow rate was 1.2 mL/min [7]. 2.7. LPS-GalN Model of fatal cytokine storm and ARDS
11
F.M. Uckun et al. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 141 (2021) 111823
Fig. 7. Comparison of the dose-dependent pharmacodynamic effects of 14-day treatment with RJX-P vs. RJX-B on liver tissue superoxide dismutase (SOD) and
ascorbic acid levels. The depicted Whisker plots represent the median and values for the liver SOD (Panel A: Male, Panel C: Female) and ascorbic acid (Panel B: Male,
Panel D: Female) levels. The error bars represent the min and max values. (ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test were used for comparing the results among different
treatment groups. Statistical significance between groups is shown by: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p< 0.001; ****p< 0.0001 compared as Control group and,
#p < 0.05; ##p < 0.01 compared as RJX-P (0.5 mL) group and, $p < 0.05; $$p < 0.01; $$$p < 0.001 pairwise comparisons between the groups).
04052020-391-046). Groups of 7 BALB/C mice were treated with i.p (ELISA) using the commercially available “Mouse IL-1 beta Quantikine
injections of RJX-P and RJX-B (6-fold diluted, 4.2 mL/kg or 2.1 mL/kg, ELISA Kit” (Sensitivity for mouse IL-1β: 4.8 pg/mL, Assay Range:
0.5 mL/mouse), or vehicle two hours before and two hours 12.5–800 pg/mL), “Mouse IL-6 Quantikine ELISA Kit” (Sensitivity for
post-injection of LPS-GalN. Untreated normal control mice did not mouse IL-6: 1.6 pg/mL, Assay Range: 7.8–500 pg/mL) and “Mouse TNFa
receive any treatments. Vehicle control mice were treated with 500 µL Quantikine ELISA Kit” (Sensitivity for mouse TNFα: 7.21 pg/mL, Assay
normal saline (NS), i.e., an aqueous solution of 0.9% NaCl with no RJX. Range: 10.9–700 pg/mL), respectively, and an absorbance microplate
NS was administered i.p 2 h before and 2 h after the i.p injection of reader (Bio-Tek Elx800 Universal Microplate Reader, Bio-Tek In
LPS-GalN. struments, Inc, Winooski, USA) according to the manufacturer’s in
Serum and tissue cytokine levels, tissue activity levels of superoxide structions (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Samples and
dismutase (SOD), tissue ascorbic acid levels, as well as tissue concen standards were analyzed in duplicate. The Kaplan-Meier method, log-
trations of malondialdehyde (MDA) were determined to examine the rank chi-square test was used to analyze the 24 h survival outcomes of
effects of the two formulations of RJX on the inflammatory process mice in the different treatment groups. At the time of death or elective
caused by LPS-GaN. IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α levels in mouse serum samples sacrifice at 24 h, lungs and liver from all mice per group were harvested,
were measured by quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays fixed in 10% buffered formalin and processed for histopathologic
12
F.M. Uckun et al. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 141 (2021) 111823
Fig. 8. Comparison of the dose-dependent pharmacodynamic effects of 14-day treatment with RJX-P vs. RJX-B on lung tissue superoxide dismutase (SOD) and
ascorbic acid levels. The depicted Whisker plots represent the median and values for the lung SOD (Panel A: Male, Panel C: Female) and ascorbic acid (Panel B: Male,
Panel D: Female) levels. The error bars represent the min and max values. (ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test were used for comparing the results among different
treatment groups. Statistical significance between groups is shown by: **p< 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001 compared as Control group and, #p < 0.05;
##p < 0.01 compared as RJX-P (0.5 mL) group and, $p < 0.01; $$p < 0.01; $$$p < 0.001 pairwise comparisons between the groups).
examination. 3. Results
2.8. Statistical analyses for non-clinical studies in the LPS-GalN mouse 3.1. Toxicity in rats
model of cytokine storm, ARDS and multi-organ failure
There were no visible toxicity signs or symptoms, including tremors,
The Decision statistical structure includes analysis of variance salivation, diarrhea in both male and female rats treated with RJX-P and
(ANOVA) using SPSS statistical program (IBM, SPPS Version 21) and/or RJX-B during the study. All rats survived, and no behavioral changes
covariance (ACOVA), nonparametric analysis of variance, simple t-tests, were observed. The majority of the RJX-P or RJX-B-treated rats gained
Tukey’s Test for homogeneity of variance, and pairwise tests by the weight during the 0–14 day, 14–28 day and, 0–28 day observation
Dunnett’s test for parametric and nonparametric data. The Tukey’s period. The average weight gain in male and female rats were 2.69 ±
multiple comparisons detected alterations among groups. Furthermore, 0.27 g and 1.55 ± 0.33 g for vehicle-treated control rats, and 3.13 ±
the Kaplan–Meier method, log-rank chi-square test, was used to inves 0.19 g and 1.19 ± 0.20 g or 3.16 ± 0.18 g and 1.44 ± 0.40 g for male and
tigate survival and fatality in each group. female rats treated with the higher dose of RJX-P or RJX-B for a 0–28
day period (Fig. 1A and B). The body weight changes were not
13
F.M. Uckun et al. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 141 (2021) 111823
Fig. 9. Comparison of the dose-dependent pharmacodynamic effects of 14-day treatment with RJX-P vs. RJX-B and sacrificed on day 28 following a 2 week recovery
period on liver tissue superoxide dismutase (SOD) and ascorbic acid levels. The depicted Whisker plots represent the median and values for the liver SOD (Panel A:
Male, Panel C: Female) and ascorbic acid (Panel B: Male, Panel D: Female) levels. The error bars represent the min and max values. (ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test
were used for comparing the results among different treatment groups).
statistically different among the groups (p > 0.05). indicates RJX-P and RJX-B at low- or high-dose levels do not affect the
The differences in blood chemistry and hematology parameter levels hematological parameters to a significant extent.
between the groups in male and female rats were not statistically sig There were no abnormalities found on macroscopic examination of
nificant (p > 0.05), and these results did not suggest any system-specific the liver, lung, kidney, spleen, heart, pancreas, brain, cerebellum, in
toxicity. RJX-P or RJX-B-treated male and female rats showed: (a) testine, stomach, testes, uterus, skeletal muscle, and skin in RJX-P or
normal serum AST, ALT TBIL and BUN, creatinine levels consistent with RJX-B-treated rats on day 15 group (Table 10) or day 28 groups
the absence of liver and renal toxicity in rats of both sexes (Tables 8 and (Table 11). In addition, histopathological examination of multiple tis
9; p > 0.05); and (b) normal WBC, ANC, ALC, and RBC counts consistent sues from RJX-P or RJX-B -treated rats in the day 15 group (Figs. 2–6) or
with the absence of hematologic toxicity (Tables 8 and 9; p > 0.05). day 28 groups showed normal organ tissue architecture similar to the
Similarly, no significant alteration was detected in the serum glucose, control group. Thus, RJX-P and RJX-B were not toxic to rats at dose
ALP, TP, ALB, GLOB levels of treated rats in both sexes compared to the levels up to 2.5 mL/kg/day.
control group (Tables 8 and 9; p > 0.05). The results of hematological
tests showed that all the parameters in RJX-P and RJX-B-treated and
control groups were within the normal range [8], which clearly
14
F.M. Uckun et al. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 141 (2021) 111823
Fig. 10. Comparison of the dose-dependent pharmacodynamic effects of 14-day treatment with RJX-P vs. RJX-B and sacrificed on day 28 following a 2 week re
covery period on lung tissue superoxide dismutase (SOD) and ascorbic acid levels. The depicted Whisker plots represent the median and values for the lung SOD
(Panel A: Male, Panel C: Female) and ascorbic acid (Panel B: Male, Panel D: Female) levels. The error bars represent the min and max values. (ANOVA and Tukey’s
post-hoc test were used for comparing the results among different treatment groups).
3.2. Pharmacodynamics in rats P (2.5 mL/kg) or RJX-B (2.5 mL/kg) groups when compared to vehicle-
treated control rats (p < 0.001). Also, rats of both sexes in the RJX-B
14-day treatment with RJX-P and RJX-B similarly elevated the Day (2.5 mL) group had higher SOD activity in the lungs when compared
15 tissue activities of the antioxidant enzyme superoxide dismutase to rats in the RJX-P (1.25 mL) and RJX-B (1.25 mL) groups. The ascorbic
(SOD) as well as ascorbic acid levels in both the lungs and liver in a dose- acid levels of lungs in both male (Fig. 8B) and female (Fig. 8D) rats were
dependent fashion (Figs. 7 and 8). The activity of SOD was significantly elevated in RJX-P (2.5 mL) and RJX-B (2.5 mL) groups when compared
higher in liver tissues of male (Fig. 7 A) and female (Fig. 7 C) rats in RJX- to the control group (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant
P (2.5 mL/kg) or RJX-B (2.5 mL/kg) groups than in liver tissues of difference in SOD activity or ascorbic acid tissue levels of rats treated
vehicle-treated control rats (p < 0.001). Also, the RJX-B (2.5 mL) group with the same dose levels of RJX-P vs. RJX-B (p > 0.05).
of male rats had higher SOD activity in the liver when compared to RJX- The observed elevations of the SOD activity and ascorbic acid levels
P (1.25 mL) and RJX-B (1.25 mL) (p < 0.05). The ascorbic acid levels of in the liver and lung were transient and were no longer detectable on
the liver in both male (Fig. 7B) and female (Fig. 7D) rats were elevated in day 28 following a 14-day recovery period (Figs. 9 and 10). These results
RJX-P (2.5 mL/kg) and RJX-B (2.5 mL/kg) groups when compared to demonstrate that RJX-P and RJX-B are bioequivalent relative to their
the control group (p < 0.001). The activity of SOD was significantly pharmacodynamic effects on tissue SOD activity and ascorbic acid
higher in lung tissues of male (Fig. 8 A) and female (Fig. 8 C) rats in RJX- levels.
15
F.M. Uckun et al. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 141 (2021) 111823
3.3. Dose-dependent in vivo protective activity of prophylactic RJX exhibited near-identical potent and dose-dependent activity in the
treatments in the LPS-GalN mouse model of ARDS and multiorgan failure LPS-GalN model of ARDS and multi-organ failure in mice.
In LPS-GalN challenged control mice not receiving any RJX treat
Seven of 7 untreated control mice remained alive throughout the ments, serum interleukin 1 beta (IL-1β) interleukin 6 (IL-6), and tumor
experiment, whereas 7 of 7 LPS-GalN injected mice died at a median of necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) levels were drastically increased at the
4.63 h (Fig. 11). Mice treated with RJX-P or RJX-B prior to the LPS-GalN time of death which is consistent with a cytokine storm and marked
challenge had a significantly improved survival outcome. 28.6% of mice systemic inflammation (P < 0.0001 for IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α when
treated with 2.1 mL/kg of 6-fold diluted RJX-P (n = 7) or RJX-B (n = 7) compared to control mice not treated with LPS-GalN) (Fig. 12). RJX
remained alive, and the median survival time was prolonged to treatments had a statistically significant and dose-dependent lowering
6.91–7.08 h (Fig. 11). Notably, 57.1% of mice treated with 4.2 mL/kg of effect on the serum levels of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL6,
6-fold diluted RJX-P (n = 7) or RJX-B (n = 7) remained alive, and the and TNF-α (Fig. 12). The results obtained with the two formulations of
median survival time was prolonged to ≥ 24 h. The 4.2 mL/kg dose of a RJX were near identical. These results demonstrate that both formula
6-fold diluted RJX corresponds to a human equivalent dose of 0.05 mL/ tions of RJX decreased the proinflammatory cytokine responses of mice
kg (0.3 mL/kg:6), which is 10-times lower than the 0.5 mL/kg recom injected with LPS-GalN, which is consistent with their ability to improve
mended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) level of RJX [3]. Hence, RJX-P and RJX-B the survival time of LPS-GalN challenged mice in a dose-dependent
16
F.M. Uckun et al. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 141 (2021) 111823
fashion.
The lung and liver malondialdehyde (MDA) levels measuring lipid
peroxidation were markedly elevated and the levels of the antioxidant
enzyme SOD as well as ascorbic acid were markedly reduced in LPS-
GalN treated mice when compared to healthy control mice, consistent
with severe oxidative stress in the lung and liver tissue (Fig. 13). Both
formulations of RJX equally decreased the lung as well as liver MDA
levels, and increased in a dose-dependent manner the reduced levels of
the antioxidant enzyme SOD and ascorbic acid (Fig. 13).
Histopathological examination of hematoxylin-eosin (H/E)-stained
lung tissues from LPS-GalN injected mice showed histological changes
consistent with severe acute ALI, including alveolar hemorrhage,
thickening of alveolar wall, edema/congestion, and leukocyte infiltra
tion (Fig. 14). These changes were not observed in the lung tissues of
mice in the control group that was not injected with LPS-GaIN. Notably,
both formulations of RJX were equally effective in attenuating the LPS-
GalN induced ALI in a dose-dependent fashion, as evidenced by signif
icantly less damage in the lungs of RJX-P and RJX-B treated mice that
were treated at the 2.1 and 4.2 mL/kg dose levels (Fig. 14). The alveolar
wall thickness as a measure of pulmonary edema was substantially
decreased to near normal values at these dose levels of RJX (Fig. 14).
Thus, both formulations of RJX prevented the development of pulmo
nary edema in LPS-GalN challenged mice. The lung histopathological
scores of ALI depicted in Fig. 16A show a dose-dependent protective
effect of RJX-P and RJX-B with a highly statistically significant and near-
identical reduction of the ALI scores at the two dose levels of RJX-P and
RJX-B that were tested.
Histopathologic examination of the livers from LPS-GalN treated
mice showed massive generalized hepatocyte vacuolation and necrosis
corresponding to >25% necrosis and destruction of the liver paren
chyma, severe lobular inflammation involving > 50% of the liver pa
renchyma, and severe portal inflammation involving more than > 50%
of portal tracts (Fig. 15). The histopathological scores documenting the
LPS-GalN caused liver damage in various treatment groups are depicted
in Fig. 16B to demonstrate that both formulations of RJX were equally
able to mitigate the liver damage in a dose-dependent manner.
4. Discussion
17
F.M. Uckun et al. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 141 (2021) 111823
Fig. 13. Tissue-level in vivo anti-oxidant activity of two Rejuveinix (RJX) related pharmaceutical compositions (RJX-P and RJX-B) in a mouse model of fatal cytokine
storm, sepsis, systemic inflammation, ARDS and multiorgan failure. Groups of 7 BALB/C mice were treated with i.p injections of RJX-P or RJX-B (6-fold diluted,
4.2 mL/kg or 2.1 mL/kg, 0.5 mL/mouse), and vehicle (NS, 0.5 mL/mouse) two hours before and two hours post-injection of LPS-GalN. Except for untreated control
mice (Control), each mouse received 0.5 mL of LPS-GalN (consisting of 100 ng of LPS plus 8 mg of D-galactosamine) i.p. The depicted Whisker plots represent the
median and values. In (A–D), ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test were used for comparing the results among different treatment groups. In (E) and (F), Welch’s
ANOVA and Games-Howell post-hoc test were used for comparing the results among different treatment groups. Statistical significance between groups is shown by
**p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001 as compared to control group, ###p < 0.001; ####p < 0.0001 as compared to LPS/GalN+NS group, ++p < 0.01;
+++p < 0.001; ++++p < 0.0001 as compared to LPS/GalN+RJX-P (4.2 ml/kg) group, and $$p < 0.01; $$$p < 0.001; $$$$p < 0.0001 as compared to LPS/
GalN+RJX-B (4.2 ml/kg) group.
18
F.M. Uckun et al. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 141 (2021) 111823
thiamine hydrochloride (Vitamin B1), riboflavin 5′ phosphate (Vitamin RJX-B at their lowest and highest tested dosage of 1.25 and 2.5 mL/kg/
B2), niacinamide (Vitamin B3), and pyridoxine hydrochloride (Vitamin day were tolerable to animals, as it did not produce any changes in
B6) have been proposed as potential anti-sepsis drugs [3]. RJX is mortality, behavior or clinical symptoms, body weight, macroscopic and
currently being evaluated in hospitalized COVID-19 patients with viral histopathological changes of the liver, lung, kidney, spleen, heart,
sepsis to test the hypothesis that it will contribute to a faster resolution pancreas, brain, cerebellum, intestine, stomach, testes, uterus, skeletal
of respiratory failure and a reduced case mortality rate [2] muscle, and skin except SOD and ascorbic acid levels increases in lung
(Clinicaltrial.gov identifier: NCT04708340; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct and liver. The daily injection of RJX-P and RJX-B for 14 days did not
2/show/NCT04708340). RJX could favorably affect the clinical course cause any morbidity, mortality, and adverse changes in safety pharma
of high-risk COVID-19 and reduce its case mortality rate [1,2]. cology laboratory parameters, including ALT, AST, ALP, BUN, and cre
The current non-clinical study was carried out to compare the safety, atine. in male or female rats. The data from the present study
PD features, and efficacy of two formulations of RJX, namely RJX-P and demonstrate that a 14-day treatment of rats with the clinically appli
RJX-B. Our results presented herein demonstrate that the two formula cable dose levels of the RJX formulations RJX-P or RJX-B does not
tions of RJX are bioequivalent relative to their pharmacodynamic effects exhibit toxic effects that are associated with morbidity or mortality.
on tissue SOD and ascorbic acid levels as well as safety profile in rodents. Both formulations increased tissue levels of ascorbic acid and SOD. RJX-
Specifically, the results showed that the administration of RJX-P and P and RJX-B were bioequivalent relative to their anti-oxidant properties,
19
F.M. Uckun et al. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 141 (2021) 111823
as documented by the near-identical pharmacodynamic effects on tissue bioequivalent in their ability to prevent the inflammatory cytokine
SOD activity and ascorbic acid levels. response, ALI, and fatal multi-organ failure. In agreement with the PD
IL-6, TNF-a, and TGF-β are important pro-inflammatory cytokines evaluations in rats, both formulations exhibited favorable and
that contribute to the pathophysiology of the cytokine release syndrome near-identical PD effects on oxidative stress in mice challenged with
(CRS), ARDS and multi-organ failure in critically sick adult COVID-19 LPS-GalN. SOD is an important antioxidant enzyme, and its activity is
patients [1,3,9]. Recently, we demonstrated that RJX prevents in the reduced by oxidative stress that is a hallmark of severe inflammation of
LPS-GalN mouse model of sepsis the marked increase of each of these sepsis, including severe viral sepsis in COVID-19 [3]. Both formulations
cytokines in the serum as well as lungs and liver [3]. Here we extend our of RJX exhibited potent anti-oxidant activity, as reflected by signifi
previous study and provide experimental evidence that two distinct cantly decreased tissue MDA levels and normalization of the tissue levels
formulations of RJX showed profound protective activity in this pre of SOD as well as ascorbic acid. Both formulations of RJX are anticipated
clinical sepsis model. Specifically, our results presented herein provide to shorten the time to resolution of ARDS by eliminating the contribu
experimental evidence that these two distinct formulations of RJX are tions of pro-inflammatory cytokines to the systemic and pulmonary
20
F.M. Uckun et al. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 141 (2021) 111823
Fig. 16. Tissue-level in vivo protective activity of two Rejuveinix (RJX) related pharmaceutical compositions (RJX and RJX-B) on lung and liver histopathological
scores in a mouse model of fatal cytokine storm, sepsis, systemic inflammation, ARDS and multiorgan failure. Groups of 7 BALB/C mice were treated with i.p in
jections of RJX-P and RJX-B (6-fold diluted, 4.2 mL/kg, or 2.1 mL/kg, 0.5 mL/mouse), and vehicle (NS, 0.5 mL/mouse) two hours before and two hours post-
injection of LPS-GalN. Except for untreated control mice (Control), each mouse received 0.5 mL of LPS-GalN (consisting of 100 ng of LPS plus 8 mg of D-galac
tosamine) i.p. The depicted Whisker plots represent the median and values. In (A), the lung histopathological score (“lung injury score”) was graded according to a 5-
point scale from 0 to 4 as follows: 0, l, 2, 3, and 4 represented no damage, mild damage, moderate damage, severe damage, and very severe damage, respectively. In
(B), the liver histopathological score (“liver injury score”) was graded according to a 5-point scale from 0 to 4 as follows: 0, l, 2, 3, and 4 represented no damage, mild
damage, moderate damage, severe damage, and very severe damage, respectively. The Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare the results
among different treatment groups. Statistical significance between groups is shown by #p < 0.05; ##p < 0.01 as compared to LPS/GaIN+NS group.
21
F.M. Uckun et al. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 141 (2021) 111823
pharmaceuticals, 1995. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-gui [7] M. Karatepe, Simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid and free malondialdehyde
deline/ich-s-3-toxicokinetics-guidance-assessing-systemic-exposure-toxicology-stu in human serum by HPLC-UV, LC GC North Am. 22 (2004) 362–365.
dies-step-5_en.pdf (Accessed 24 March 2021). [8] S.C. Gad, The rat pathology, in: S.C. Gad, C.P. Chengellis (Eds.), Animal Models in
[6] Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Test No. 420: Acute Oral Toxicology, CRC Press, New York, 2007, pp. 147–217.
Toxicity – Fixed Dose Procedure, OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, [9] F.M. Uckun, Reducing the fatality rate of COVID-19 by applying clinical insights
Section 4, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2002. from immuno-oncology and lung transplantation, Front. Pharmacol. 11 (796)
(2020), https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.00796.
22