Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1185 | P a g e
Afroz Sultana.SK, K.S.B. Prasad/ International Journal of Engineering Research and
Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com
Vol. 2, Issue 4, July-August 2012, pp.1185-1191
1186 | P a g e
Afroz Sultana.SK, K.S.B. Prasad/ International Journal of Engineering Research and
Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com
Vol. 2, Issue 4, July-August 2012, pp.1185-1191
170°C. The concentration of PP, LDPE and HDPE The combination of aggregate (modified and
used, were 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3 and 5% by weight unmodified), filler and binder (modified and
of blend. Mixing was continued for 30 min to produce unmodified) was mixed mechanically at a
homogenous mixtures. Empirical test such as temperature of 165oC for 1.5 min.
penetration, softening point and ductility were then The specimens formulated were then compacted
conducted on the prepared samples. at 145oC using Marshall Apparatus.
TABLE 6
Natural and Plastic Coated Aggregates (unmodified and modified)
Aggregate impact value Los Angeles Abrasion Aggregate Crushing
Stone % of
(IS 2386 (part IV) - Test (IS 2386 (part IV) - Value (IS 2386 (part IV)
aggregates plastic
1963) % 1963) % - 1963)%
Without
0 23.7 22.24 24.5
plastic
PP LDPE HDPE PP LDPE HDPE PP LDPE HDPE
With 1 19.5 17.9 18.2 18.56 16.68 20.44 23.4 20.19 21.56
plastic 2 15.3 14.1 12.42 17.48 14 16.3 18.5 13.55 17.4
3 10.2 9.7 8.45 16.4 12.2 11.42 15.6 11.74 13.28
1187 | P a g e
Afroz Sultana.SK, K.S.B. Prasad/ International Journal of Engineering Research and
Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com
Vol. 2, Issue 4, July-August 2012, pp.1185-1191
Figure 1 variation of crushing value with different % Figure 3 variation of abrasion value with different %
of plastic. of plastic
TABLE 7
Tests Conducted on Natural and Modified Bitumen
% of Softening point(oC) Penetration value (mm) Ductility (cm)
plastic (IS: 1205 – 1978) (IS: 1203 - 1978) (IS: 1208 – 1978)
PP LDPE HDPE PP LDPE HDPE PP LDPE HDPE
0 52.25 52.5 52.28 9.3 9.7 8.9 77 80 83
0.5 52.75 52.8 53 7.91 9.1 8.64 61 70.55 75.3
1 58.75 53.5 53 6.68 7.7 8.4 37 63.2 67.28
1.5 60.2 57.25 54.5 6.25 6.84 6.9 25 55.78 58
2 61.75 62.3 58 5.45 6.3 5.4 14.66 50.3 49.6
3 63.25 65 67.4 4.86 4.26 4.3 12 42.6 33
4 65.25 72.5 73 4.43 4.0 3.9 11.33 40 26.45
5 74.25 74 79 3.36 3.6 2.3 9.83 32.5 19
Figure 4 variation of softening point with different % Figure 5 Variation of penetration value with different
of plastic % of plastic
1188 | P a g e
Afroz Sultana.SK, K.S.B. Prasad/ International Journal of Engineering Research and
Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com
Vol. 2, Issue 4, July-August 2012, pp.1185-1191
1189 | P a g e
Afroz Sultana.SK, K.S.B. Prasad/ International Journal of Engineering Research and
Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com
Vol. 2, Issue 4, July-August 2012, pp.1185-1191
0 16.3 12.8 16.3 12.8 16.3 12.8 16.3 12.8 Figure 10 compressive strength of cubes for 3, 7, 28
days
4 16.8 13.6 17.5 13.7 15.4 12.3 15.7 12.7
18.0 5. CONCLUSIONS
6 14.9 18.9 14.5 16 13.2 16.9 14.0
5 From the preliminary studies of aggregates and
8 19.8 16.4 21.0 16.3 14.5 11.7 18.4 15.4 bitumen, the following conclusions are drawn
1. By using plastic as a coating over aggregates, the
10 17 13.9 20 16.6 13.4 10.5 16.5 13.4 properties of aggregates are improved. This shows
hat weak aggregates can be used in construction
by using plastic as a binder material.
2. By adding plastic to the unmodified bitumen, the
rheological properties have been improved. There
is an increase in the softening point and decrease
in penetration and ductility values. The decrease in
penetration value which indicates the hardness of
the bitumen.
By conducting Marshall Stability the following
conclusions can be drawn.
1. By increasing the percentage of plastic, the
Figure 8 variation of index of retained strength with stability values are increased and required
% of plastic for plastic coated aggregates quantities of binder contents are decreased.
2. Based on the stability values, the optimum
percentage of plastic is 8%, 6% for plastic coated
aggregate samples and polymer modified
bitumen samples respectively for PP type of
plastic, and 8% is optimum for LDPE type of
plastic for both plastic coated aggregate and
polymer modified samples.
3. Based on stability values the plastic coated
aggregate samples are more stable than polymer
modified bitumen and can use be used in higher
percentages of plastic.
Figure 9 variation of index of retained strength with 4. The low density polythene type of plastic shows
% of plastic for polymer modified bitumen samples. better performance values than polypropylene.
5. The performance values showed that there is
4.4 Study On Concrete Cubes better improvement in flexible pavement rather
than rigid pavements. By conducting the loss of
The mix design is done according to 10262-
stability test, the results obtained is greater than
2009.The plastic coated aggregates were mixed with
75% and this shows that these mixes can perform
the cement, sand and water. Cubes were casted and
well in adverse situations.
tested for compressive strength. The results are shown
By conducting compressive strength of cubes
in figure 10.
using plastic coated aggregates, there is no significant
From the figure 10, it is observed that there is a
increase in the strength of cubes.
drastical change in the compressive strength when
compared with plastic coated aggregates to plain
1190 | P a g e
Afroz Sultana.SK, K.S.B. Prasad/ International Journal of Engineering Research and
Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com
Vol. 2, Issue 4, July-August 2012, pp.1185-1191
By using these plastic wastes for road construction, [11] Vasudevan R, “Tar Road with Plastics Waste –
there is a possibility of reducing disposal of waste A Successful Experiment in Mumbai”,
plastic which is harmful to the environment. Environmental information system (Envis)
Indian Centre for Plastics in the Environment,
Vol.3, pp 1-2, 2005.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT [12] Khanna S.K. and C.E.G Justo, “Highway
I thank Mr. K.S.B. Prasad for his support and Materials Testing” Nem chand and bros.,
guidance in completion of this study, and also Roorkee, India, pp 63-87, 2007.
thankful to the lab technician and other lab assistants. [13] Prithvi Singh kandhal & M.P.Dhir (2011), “Use
of Modified Bituminous Binders In India:
current imperatives”, Journal of the Indian
REFERENCES Roads Congress, paper no 573.
[14] Shivangi Gupta & A. Veeraragavan (2009),
[1] A.I. Al-Hadidy, Tan Yi-qiu (2009)“Effect of “Fatigue Behaviour Of Polymer Modified
polyethylene on life of flexible pavements”, Bituminous Concrete Mixtures”, Journal of the
Construction and Building Materials, pp 1456– Indian Roads Congress, paper no-548.
1464 [15] Sobhan M.A, M. Zakaira (2001), “Experimental
[2] A.I. Al-Hadidy, Tan Yi-qiu (2009), behavoiur of bituminous macadam mixes with
“Mechanistic approach for polypropylene- brick aggregates”, Journal of civil engineering,
modified flexible pavements”, pp 1133–1140. vol. CE 29, no.1
[3] Bind C.S & K.S.Beena (2010) “Waste plastic [16] Verma s.s (2008), “Roads from Waste Plastic”,
as a stabilizing additive in Stone Mastic The Indian concrete journal, pp 43-47.
Asphalt”, International Journal of Engineering [17] Vasudevan.R, S.K. Nigam, R. Velkennedy, A.
and Technology, Vol.2 (6), pp 379-387. Ramalinga Chandra Sekar1 and B.
[4] Guidelines for the use of Plastic Waste in Rural Sundarakannan (2007), “Utilization of Waste
Roads Construction, National Rural Roads Polymers for Flexible Pavement and Easy
Development Ministry of Rural Development, Disposal of Waste Polymers”, Proceedings of
GoI. the International Conference on Sustainable
[5] Garcia-Morales M, P. Partal, F.J. Navarro, C. Solid Waste Management, September, pp 105-
Gallegos (2006), “Effect of waste polymer 111.
addition on the rheology of modified bitumen”,
Fuel, pp 936–943.
[6] Moatasim Attaelmanan, Cheng Pei Feng, Al-
Hadidy AI (2011), “Laboratory evaluation of
HMA with high density polyethylene as a
modifier”, Construction and Building
Materials, pp 2764–2770.
[7] Naskara.M, T.K. Chakia, K.S. reddy, “Effect
of waste plastic as modifier on thermal stability
and degradation kinetics of bitumen/waste
plastics blend”, Thermochimica Acta, pp 128–
134, 2010.
[8] Noor Zainab Habib, Ibrahim Kamaruddin,
Madzalan Napiah and Isa Mohd Tan (2011),
“Rheological Properties of Polyethylene and
Polypropylene Modified Bitumen”
International Journal of Civil and
Environmental Engineering, 3:2 2011.
[9] Vasudevan R, “Utilization of waste plastics for
flexible pavement”, Indian Highways (Indian
Road Congress), vol. 34, no.7, pp 105-111,
2006.
[10] Vasudevan R, “Use of plastic waste in
construction of tar road”, Environmental
information system (Envis), Indian Centre for
Plastics in the Environment, Vol.2, pp 1-4,
2004.
1191 | P a g e