Professional Documents
Culture Documents
*
G.R. No. 219811. April 6, 2016.
_______________
* SECOND DIVISION.
57
file://ggwpc/Cases/mht/Daclison%20v.%20Baytion_files/a.htm 3/27/2021
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 789 Page 2 of 10
MENDOZA, J.:
1
Assailed in this petition for review are the February 5,
2 3
2015 Decision and the August 3, 2015 Resolution of the
_______________
58
The Antecedents
file://ggwpc/Cases/mht/Daclison%20v.%20Baytion_files/a.htm 3/27/2021
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 789 Page 3 of 10
_______________
59
file://ggwpc/Cases/mht/Daclison%20v.%20Baytion_files/a.htm 3/27/2021
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 789 Page 4 of 10
60
_______________
61
file://ggwpc/Cases/mht/Daclison%20v.%20Baytion_files/a.htm 3/27/2021
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 789 Page 5 of 10
_______________
8 Id., at p. 41.
9 Id.
62
file://ggwpc/Cases/mht/Daclison%20v.%20Baytion_files/a.htm 3/27/2021
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 789 Page 6 of 10
Issues
I.
THE HONORABLE COURT A QUO GRAVELY
ERRED WHEN IT HELD THAT THE INSTANT
CASE IS AN ACCION PUBLICIANA, MORE
SIGNIFICANTLY [WITH] RESPECT TO THE
LAND OUTSIDE TCT NO. 221507; THAT,
EFFECTIVELY, THE RESPONDENT HAS
PRIOR POSSESSION OF THE PROPERTY
OUTSIDE TCT NO. 221507.
II.
THE HONORABLE COURT A QUO GRAVELY
ERRED UNDER THE LAW WHEN IT RULED
THAT THE PETITIONER WAS A LESSEE OF
THE SECOND PROPERTY.
_______________
10 Id., at p. 43.
11 Id., at pp. 43-44.
63
III.
THE HONORABLE COURT A QUO GRAVELY
ERRED UNDER THE LAW WHEN IT RULED
THAT THE SECOND PROPERTY OR LAND WAS
AN IMPROVEMENT ON THE PROPERTY OF
THE RESPONDENT.
IV.
THE HONORABLE COURT A QUO GRAVELY
ERRED UNDER THE LAW WHEN IT RULED
THAT THE RESPONDENT HAS LEGAL
CAPACITY TO SUE.
V.
THE HONORABLE COURT A QUO GRAVELY
file://ggwpc/Cases/mht/Daclison%20v.%20Baytion_files/a.htm 3/27/2021
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 789 Page 7 of 10
_______________
64
file://ggwpc/Cases/mht/Daclison%20v.%20Baytion_files/a.htm 3/27/2021
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 789 Page 8 of 10
_______________
16 Id., at p. 29.
17 Id., at pp. 125-126.
65
_______________
18 Republic v. Court of Appeals, 217 Phil. 483, 489; 132 SCRA 514, 520
(1984).
file://ggwpc/Cases/mht/Daclison%20v.%20Baytion_files/a.htm 3/27/2021
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 789 Page 9 of 10
19 Id.
66
_______________
67
file://ggwpc/Cases/mht/Daclison%20v.%20Baytion_files/a.htm 3/27/2021
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 789 Page 10 of 10
——o0o——
file://ggwpc/Cases/mht/Daclison%20v.%20Baytion_files/a.htm 3/27/2021