Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The equation of motion for the mass can, if there are no external forces, be written
as
(1)
Thus, the support acceleration appears as a gravity-like load. There are two
advantages with this representation:
The internal forces in the system — that is, elastic and damping forces —
depend on relative displacements and velocities. These forces are not affected
by a rigid body motion.
Often, measured data is available in terms of an accelerogram, so that the
foundation displacements are not directly available.
For given values of , , and , this equation can be solved for a sufficiently
long time. The displacement, velocity, and acceleration response spectra are defined
as the maximum values caused by the acceleration history .
These are all relative spectra. It is possible to do a similar definition of
the absolute spectra, by instead using the absolute displacement .
Sometimes, a distinction is made between the positive and negative spectra, so that
Thus,
The maximum absolute value of the relative displacement must thus occur at the
same time as the maximum absolute value of the absolute acceleration. The scale
factor between the two is . For systems with low damping, this relation will still
be approximately true. Since most mechanical systems have a low damping (often
2% to 5%), it is customary to assume that the spectra for the absolute acceleration
and the pseudoacceleration are the same.
Another common way of describing the damping in this context is by the Q
factor (quality factor). The relation to the damping ratio is given by
The equation can be solved by a pure numerical time stepping, but there may be
better ways of doing it. If is given as a number of points in an accelerogram,
then it is natural to assume that the acceleration has a linear variation in time
between those points. So, for each interval between two measurements, say from
to , the equation of motion for the oscillator is
This equation, where the right-hand side is a linear function of time, can be solved
analytically for each time interval. The initial conditions are obtained from the final
state of the previous interval.
The maximum values can actually occur after the end of the driving event. This will
happen for low values of (long periods). The time-stepping must thus be
continued at least until a full period if the oscillator has elapsed.
Relative displacement
Relative velocity
Relative and absolute acceleration
The absolute displacement and velocity are not available, since only is known,
but not and . It is, of course, possible to recover the foundation velocity
and displacement by time integration of the acceleration. In practice, this integration
will, however, cause a drift, so that the final velocity and displacement turn out to be
nonzero. Since nonzero final displacements and velocities are unphysical (at least
for many types of events), some numerical filtering has to be applied. For shocks,
there is also a question of which initial values should be chosen for the displacement
and velocity of the foundation.
For low frequencies, the acceleration tends toward zero with a rate that is inversely
proportional to the frequency. With a very soft oscillator, the base movement will
just compress the spring without significant movement of the mass.
It can also be seen that the pseudoacceleration spectrum in this case is almost
indistinguishable from the actual absolute acceleration spectrum, even though the
damping is 5%.
In the figures below, the time response for the oscillator is shown for three different
choices of its natural frequency, corresponding to the markers in the response
spectrum above.
At 15 Hz, the load pulse just gives a small initial push, and then the oscillator
experiences free vibration at its natural frequency. The peak acceleration
occurs a long time after the end of the excitation.
At 75 Hz, there is maximum dynamic amplification. The load pulse is
essentially in phase with the relative velocity, and it provides a maximal
energy input to the system.
At 500 Hz, the oscillator to a large extent acts as a rigid body, closely
following the base acceleration. The peak acceleration is almost the same as
that of the base acceleration.
Absolute acceleration at a natural frequency of 15 Hz and damping of 5%.
Absolute acceleration at a natural frequency of 75 Hz and damping of 5%.
Absolute acceleration at a natural frequency of 500 Hz and damping of 5%.
The relative displacement spectrum is shown below. This is essentially the same as
the acceleration spectrum above, but scaled with a factor
The relative displacement response spectrum for 5% damping.
Next, the relative velocity spectrum and the pseudovelocity spectrum are compared.
As can be seen, they are quite different. The pseudovelocity and pseudoacceleration
spectra do not represent the true relative spectra. This is a general observation, and
the pseudo spectra should be viewed as different representations of the displacement
spectrum.
The relative velocity response spectrum and the pseudovelocity spectrum for 5% damping.
The response spectrum for the half sine pulse is actually somewhat atypical. The
reason is that this pulse only has positive acceleration. If it is integrated with respect
to time, such pulse corresponds to a resulting nonzero velocity and an ever-
increasing displacement. Most events, like earthquakes, have the property that both
displacement and velocity are zero both before and after the event. If a complete sine
pulse is used instead of a half sine pulse, the characteristic low-frequency decay is
also obtained.
Response spectrum for a full sine pulse.
These curves are typical for an event for which response spectrum analysis is
relevant. A visual examination of the signal suggests that the main frequency content
is in the range of 1–3 Hz, while the duration of the major part of the event is about
30 s. Thus, the conditions are not even close to being considered as a steady state.
On the other hand, there is a significant number of cycles (of the order of 100),
which can excite a structure having resonances in the 0.5–30-Hz range.
The computed response spectra for 2% and 5% damping are shown below.
Pseudoacceleration spectra for the N–S direction for the El Centro earthquake.
Pseudoacceleration spectra for the E–W direction for the El Centro earthquake.
The response spectra exhibit some interesting general properties. Higher damping
will give lower response values and a smoother spectrum. Both these properties are
related to the fact that the frequency response of an oscillator will have lower but
wider peaks at higher damping.
Furthermore, there is a significant difference in the amplitudes in the N–S and E–W
directions. However, there is a general resemblance between the shapes of the
spectra in the two directions.
In order to be able to use a response spectrum for analysis of an event that has not
yet happened, a design response spectrum is created. The design response spectrum
can be seen as an envelope over all known and anticipated earthquakes in a certain
geographical region. Such spectra are, for example, provided in building codes like
ASCE 7-16 and Eurocode 8 (Ref. 2–3). The acceleration levels in a design response
spectrum will typically depend on the geographical location and the type of soil.
The design response spectrum is the actual input to the response spectrum analysis.
Design response spectra are often provided in terms of the period, rather than the
frequency. Since one is the inverse of the other, the two graphs are just mirrored
when plotting on a logarithmic scale.
Example of a design response spectrum.
A large system, like a piping system, may not have the same floor response spectrum
at all of its support points. This causes significant complications to the analysis.
The structure is at a number of points connected to a common "ground" that has the
base motion . This vector has the same size as (the total number of DOFs),
but it contains only three different values: in all x-translation DOF, in
all y-translation DOF, and in all z-translation DOF. The relative displacement
is now . With no external load, the equation of motion is
or
Here, the fact that a rigid body motion does not introduce any elastic or viscous
forces in the system has been used, so that .
can be computed.
These eigenmodes can represent the relative displacements (but not the absolute
displacements), since all eigenmodes will have zero displacements at the support
points in an eigenfrequency analysis .
It has been assumed that the mass matrix normalization of the eigenmodes is used
and that the damping matrix can be diagonalized by the eigenmodes. The mass
matrix normalization is not essential, but it will simplify certain expressions.
Here, is the modal coefficient for mode j, so that the relative displacement can be
written as a linear combination of eigenmodes, weighted by the modal coordinates:
To summarize, the peak amplitude for a certain eigenmode is the product of the
response spectrum value at the corresponding natural frequency (which is
independent of the structure) and the participation factor (which is a property of the
structure but independent of the loading).
These summation rules are nonlinear. For all combination types, all result quantities
are strictly positive. As an effect, any quantity must be summed based on its own
modal response. For example, stress components must be computed using the modal
stresses and cannot be recovered from the summed strains, and strains cannot be
recovered from summed displacements. This has many consequences for the
interpretation of results from a response spectrum analysis. Some examples are:
It is not meaningful to plot displacement shapes, since the individual
displacement components do not match.
An equivalent stress, like von Mises, cannot be computed from individual
stress components.
If there are interaction rules, like the combination of normal force and
moment in a beam, the way of doing the summation is sensitive. A
conservative interpretation separately determines the two quantities and then
works with the sums and differences.
Particular care must be taken with respect to the signs if the results of the
response spectrum analysis are to be added to results from a static load case,
like a dead load.
Often, the excitation is given in three orthogonal directions. The general approach is
to consider the excitation in the three directions separately. First,
all modal responses are summed for each direction, and then the results for the three
directions are summed. An exception is the CQC3 summation rule, described below,
in which the spatial and modal summation is done at the same time.
Modes with a significant dynamic response constitute the periodic modes. The
maximum values for such modes will be more or less randomly distributed in time,
since their periods differ. For this reason, the periodic part of the response requires
more sophisticated summation techniques. A plain summation of the maximum
values will, in general, significantly overestimate the true response.
Modes that are in a transition region will partially contribute to the periodic modes
and partially to the rigid ones. In addition, it is sometimes necessary to add some
static load cases containing a missing mass correction.
Not all analyses require a separation into periodic and rigid modes. If not, all modes
are treated as periodic.
There are two different methods in use by which partitioning can be done. In either
case, for mode j,
so that
The difference between the two methods lies in how the coefficient is
determined. For low frequencies, it should approach the value 0, and for high
frequencies, the value 1.
Gupta Method
In the Gupta method, is a linear function of the logarithm of the natural
frequency.
Here, and are two key frequencies. Thus, for eigenfrequencies below , the
modes are considered as purely periodic, and above , purely rigid. In the original
Gupta method, the lower key frequency is given by
Here, and are the maximum values of the acceleration and velocity
spectra, respectively. In the idealized spectrum above, this occurs at the point D.
The second key frequency should be chosen so that the modes above this frequency
behave as rigid modes. The frequency can be taken as the one where the response
spectra for different damping ratios converge to each other.
Lindley-Yow Method
This is also the high-frequency asymptotic value of the absolute acceleration (or
pseudoacceleration) in the response spectrum. It corresponds to the F-G part of the
idealized spectrum.
Thus,
The value of must, for physical reasons, be in the range of 0 to 1 and increase
with frequency. For this reason, NRC RG 1.92 (Ref. 1) requires that be set to
zero for any eigenmodes below point C.
The most conservative method is to sum the maximum response for all N modes,
thus assuming that all modes reach their maximum at the same time. In many cases,
this approach leads to a design that is significantly overconservative.
In the worst case scenario, the predicted result using N, not closely spaced modes
can be a factor larger than what would be obtained using the other methods
below.
The most popular method for superposition of the periodic modes is the complete
quadratic combination (CQC) method:
The interaction between the modes is determined by the mode interaction
coefficient ( ). Since is symmetric and when , it
is more efficient to use the equivalent expression
This expression is actually valid for several evaluation rules. The only difference is
how is computed. Several such expressions are given below. When a method is
referred to as CQC, it is usually implied that the Der Kiureghian correlation
coefficient is used.
Here, and are the natural frequencies of the two modes, and and are
the corresponding modal damping ratios.
For the common case of uniform damping, the expression can be simplified to
It is possible that the response from two different modes, and , have
different signs, so that a cross term can give a negative contribution to the sum. This
is intentional, but it is a common misconception that the absolute values of
and should be used. However, the underlying analysis contains an assumption
about the response being a linear function of the mode shape. If this it not the
case, using absolute values is a safer approach. The most common nonlinear result
quantities, like effective stresses, are always positive, in which case all terms in the
sum will give a positive contribution anyway.
The strength of the correlation between two modes depends on the frequency ratio
for the modes, but it also strongly depends on the damping.
The Der Kiureghian mode correlation factor for different damping ratios as a function of the ratio
between the pair of eigenfrequencies.
The double sum method uses a mode interaction coefficient , which is called the
Rosenblueth correlation coefficient. It is conceptually similar to the Der Kiureghian
correlation coefficient.
The older version of this method is actually erroneous, but the results are more
conservative than those of the newer variant, so it can be used without risk.
In either case,
where
and
Here, is a separate input. The duration of the dynamic event and are the modal
damping ratios. For large values of , the modal correlation factor in the double
sum method is rather similar to that of the Der Kiureghian model. For smaller values
of , a much stronger correlation is predicted by the double sum method.
SRSS Method
The SRSS method does not include any interaction between the modes; that is,
This method should only be used when the modes are not closely spaced; that is,
when no two eigenfrequencies are close to each other. All other methods take
possible interaction between the modes into account in various ways.
Grouping Method
1. Start a new group by adding the lowest (in frequency), not yet grouped
eigenmode k
2. Step up through the eigenfrequencies from k
After having exhausted the list of eigenmodes, there is a number of groups, where
some may contain just a single eigenmode. The rule for the correlation factor
between two modes is
The sign() operator used here is a way of stating that the absolute value of the
product of the modal responses is added to the sum, since
The ten percent method is similar to the grouping method in the sense that
eigenmodes with a natural frequency difference of less than 10% get a special
interaction treatment. The modal correlation coefficient is
It can be noted that both the grouping method and the ten percent method are
equivalent to the SRSS method if no pair of eigenfrequencies are within 10% from
each other. When using the CQC method, however, the modes are also considered as
significantly coupled at a larger spacing, unless the damping is very low.
Combination Method A
Here, is the result of the solution to the static load case when solving
for missing mass, as described below.
Combination Method B
This method can only be used when the Lindley-Yow method is used together with
the static ZPA method. Then, the rigid mode response is simply
Since a mode superposition uses a limited number of modes, some mass that is
attributed to the nonused modes will, in general, be missing from the analysis. With
the assumption that the higher-order modes do not have any dynamic amplification,
it is possible to devise a correction by solving some extra static load cases
containing the peak acceleration acting on the "lost" mass. The effect of applying a
static correction is usually most prominent when evaluating support forces.
Here, is the original load vector and are the modal loads; that, is the projection
of the physical load on each eigenmode,
In the base excitation context, the load vector related to excitation in direction I is
Thus,
For the rigid body modes, the peak acceleration is equal to the zero period
acceleration (ZPA). This is the maximum ground acceleration during the event,
which also corresponds to the high-frequency asymptote of the acceleration
spectrum.
The extra displacement correcting for the missing mass is now given by solving the
standard static problem
The expression
can be viewed as a type of auxiliary mode. In this context, it is a vector with the
length of the number of DOFs.
In this method, there is no need to deduce the missing mass. This method can only
be used together with the Lindley-Yow method for separating periodic and rigid
modes. According to the method, all rigid modes have the acceleration . This
acceleration is given to the whole structure. The static load cases are thus just
pure gravity loads, but scaled by instead of the acceleration of gravity.
Often, however, it is reasonable to assume that the excitation in the two horizontal
directions have different amplitudes, even though they share the same spectral
properties. The spectrum in the local Y direction is then a scaled version of the
spectrum in the local X direction,
Use the same spectrum in both horizontal directions; that is, . This will
be a conservative approach.
Run a number of separate analyses where the X direction is rotated to different
orientations. If 15 degrees can be considered a small enough rotation
increment, then seven analyses are needed.
Use a combination rule (CQC3), which takes the possible rotation into
account.
SRSS Method
In the square root of sum of squares (SRSS) method, the total resultant is computed
as
In this method, the contribution from the worst direction is taken at full value,
whereas the two other contributions are reduced. There are two variants in common
use: the 40% (100-40-40) method and the 30% (100-30-30) method. The
interpretation is clear: At the time when the peak value is reached for the worst
direction, the values for the other directions are not higher than 40% (30%) of their
individual peak values.
In some formulations of this rule, the renumbering is not done and the expression is
instead written as
In practice, the same result is obtained as long as the signs are properly taken into
account when summing the results for multiple responses.
The 40% method is slightly more conservative when compared to the SRSS
summation. The 30% method can, for some combination of values, be significantly
on the nonconservative side.
The percent methods are not spatially isotropic. For a symmetric structure, members
that, for symmetry reasons, should have the same level of loading will not
experience that. The orientation of the reference axes for the acceleration orientation
will matter.
CQC3 Method
The CQC3 method extends the CQC principles to the spatial combination. In the
CQC3 method, the modal and spatial combinations are performed simultaneously. It
is mainly applicable when only the periodic modes are taken into account.
As in the standard CQC method, the modal response for each loading direction is
summed as
In addition, a similar expression, giving the cross coupling between the responses to
the spectra in the two horizontal directions, is formed:
It is now conceptually assumed that the response spectra are instead applied in a
local coordinate system X'-Y', which is rotated by an angle with respect to the X-
Y orientations. If the responses are linear functions of the eigenmodes, it can then be
shown that
Also, if the relation of the applied spectra is such that , then the same
ratio will apply to the responses. The peak response as a function of the rotation
angle is obtained by an SRSS-type summation
There are two roots for , both of which must be checked in order to find the
worst case.
The attractiveness of the CQC3 method lies in that the same spectrum can be applied
to an arbitrary pair of orthogonal axes. The scaling of the secondary spectrum, as
well as the orientation of the worst direction, is taken care of by the method.
Note, however, that if a nonlinear response quantity is studied, the CQC3 method is
not exact. In such cases, the only fundamentally correct option is to actually apply
the spectra along several rotated axes.
SRSS3 Method
The SRSS3 method is a special case of the CQC3 rule, in which the mode
correlation is ignored; that is
It retains the property of selecting the worst orientation through the search for .
Published: January 28, 2019
Last modified: January 28, 2019
References
1. Regulatory Guide 1.92, Revision 3, Combining modal responses
and spatial components in seismic response analysis, US Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, 2012.