Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Facile Metallization
Facile Metallization
1 Introduction
The end use of classical fabric is not limited to traditional dress wear. The property
and functionality of the fabric can be enhanced by integrating nanomaterials in it
[1–3]. The electrically conductive fabrics are used for organic photovoltaic (OPV)
[4], wearable radio-frequency (RF) devices such as textile-based antennas and trans-
mission line [5–8], solar cells [9], electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding [10],
wearable activity monitors [11], fiber-field-effect transistors [12], heatable textiles
[13]. There are several methods to grow conductive nanoparticle. Among them, the
polyol synthesis process is most frequently used [14]. The polyol synthesis process
is very complicated, and the chemical utilization is also high. In this work, a conduc-
tive feature is added to the cotton-based woven and knitted fabric using both CuSO4
and AgNO3 by means of cyclewise layer-by-layer coating of nanoparticle. In this
technique, there is no need to grow nanoparticles at the very first step. Conductive
nanoparticles can be grown on the surface of the textile. AgNO3 is a very pretty
substance to grow conductive nanoparticles. But, it is too much costly. Therefore,
CuSO4 can be used as a cheap metallic salt to grow conductive nanoparticles on
the textile material surface. But the problem of using copper nanoparticles is their
inherent tendency to oxidize in ambient conditions. In the recent study, it has been
mentioned that copper nanoparticles can resist oxidation under ambient conditions,
if they are coated with a proper protective layer [15]. That is why copper and silver
nanoparticles have been concurrently used. Silver nanoparticle acts as a protective
layer on the copper nanoparticles. This technique is very cost-effective as well as
there is no possibility to oxidize copper nanoparticles in ambient condition. We can
grow nanoparticle by using sodium borohydride [16] and trisodium citrate [17], tri-
calcium phosphate [18] as reducing agent of silver salt. These chemicals are toxic and
hazardous. Ascorbic acid works both as reducing and protecting agent, which makes
the nanoparticle-growing process economical, non-toxic, and environment-friendly
[19]. So, ascorbic acid has been chosen to grow both copper and silver nanoparticles
on the surface of sample using dip and dry method. As it has been mentioned that it
is a cheaper process and involves less chemical utilization, simply distilled water has
been used as the solvent. A comparison is established among knitted and woven fab-
ric in terms of conductivity. To find out the optimum concentration 1% (1 g/100 mL
water), 3% (3 g/100 mL water), and 5% (5 g/100 mL water) chemical concentration
were taken into consideration. A simple LED circuit was integrated with the fabric to
test the compatibility of the fabric for the application of wearable electronic textiles.
It is observed that the fabric sample is very suitable for current passing. Further,
the resistance of the sample does not change due to bending up to 100 cycles. In
the previous studies, it has been found that the silver-nanowire-decorated conductive
fabric cannot be considered as waterproof and loses its conductivity after washing
for a few cycles [13]. To overcome this challenge, a thin layer of silicon binder was
applied onto the fabric surface which leads to make the fabric waterproof without
the changing of conductivity at all.
Facile Metallization Technique of Textiles for Electronic … 93
2 Experimental Process
10000
1000
100
18.5
10
6
4.5
1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Number of cycles
1% concentration 3%concentration 5% concentration
fabric sample below 20 per inch length. On the other hand, 3% chemical con-
centration required 11 cycles and 5% chemical concentration required 6 cycles to
obtain resistance below 20 per inch length. Though 5% chemical concentration
required lowest number of cycle, the chemical consumption for 3% was lower than
that of 5% concentration. Considering both the factors of the number of cycle and
chemical consumption, 3% concentration can be regarded as the optimum concen-
tration. Figure 2 shows the change in resistance of sample for different chemical
concentrations.
Facile Metallization Technique of Textiles for Electronic … 95
To compare among cotton-based woven and knitted fabric, a woven fabric sample and
a knitted fabric sample each of similar size were taken. Single-jersey knitted fabric is
not suitable for coating because of its inherent tendency to curling. Rib knitted fabric
has a porous structure which is a major problem to build up continuous conductive
network on the fabric surface. That is why interlock knitted fabric with higher GSM
is suitable. We have selected interlock fabric with course per inch-60, wales per inch-
35, and GSM-190 for the experiment. In case of woven fabric, tight structure gives
better conductivity. For this reason, woven fabric with the specification: 1/1 plain
structure, ends per inch-64, picks per inch-48, and GSM-110 was selected for the
experiment. Both of the cotton-based woven and interlock knitted fabric samples were
coated using 3% chemical concentration. It was observed that knitted fabric required 9
cycles and woven fabric required 11 cycles to reach the resistance below 5 per inch
length. But the knitted fabric is not suitable to withstand mechanical stress. Knitted
fabric loses its conductivity when undergoes any mechanical deformation. Since,
knitted fabric has enough elongation property, when it undergoes an external load,
it shows the tendency to elongate. As a result, the continuous conductive network is
broken and knitted sample fails to show constant conductivity. On the other hand,
woven fabric sample shows constant conductivity because of its lowest elongation
property. Figure 3 represents the comparison among the cotton-based woven and
knitted sample in terms of resistance.
Fig. 3 Comparison among Comparison between woven and knitted sample in the term of
woven and knitted sample conductivity
100000
Resistance in Ω per inch
10500
10300
10000
1000
100
10
4.5
2.8
1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Number of cycles
woven sample knitted sample
96 Md. Momtaz Islam et al.
100000
10000
1000
100
10
1
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100
Number of bending cycles
Woven sample Knitted sample
same cycle has been repeated 100 times for woven and knitted sample. It is observed
that woven sample does not change its resistance due to bending up to 100 cycles,
whereas knitted sample starts to increase its resistance due to bending for a few cycles
and after about 65 cycles its resistance increases significantly due to dimensional
deformation which causes the breakage in the conductive network. Note that, the
metallized fabrics (both woven and knit) were not coated with waterproof silicon
coating, while the bending test was performed. The goal of this test was to analyze
the particle-to-particle and particle-to-fiber adhesion of the metallized woven and
knitted fabric without the addition of silicon coating under mechanical deformation.
Figure 4 shows the change in resistance due to bending.
A simple LED circuit was integrated with the fabric to test the compatibility of the
fabric for the application of wearable electronic textiles. It has been observed that the
fabric sample is very suitable for current passing. Figure 5a shows the conductivity
below 10 per inch length and Fig. 5b shows LED demonstration.
When fabric sample undergoes dip coasting, a thin, uniform conductive layer of
nanoparticle is deposited on the fabric surface. The conductive layer reduces the
Facile Metallization Technique of Textiles for Electronic … 97
Fig. 6 Optical images of a native woven fabric, b woven fabric metallized with 3 weight % of
AgNO3 solution, c silicon binder coating of metallized woven fabric, d native knitted fabric, e knitted
fabric coated with 3 weight % of AgNO3 solution and f silicon binder coating of metallized knitted
fabric
porosity of the fabric. It is shown from the optical images that the fibers of both
knitted and woven fabrics have been properly coated with a metal layer. It is note-
worthy that the dimensional stability of knitted fabric has significantly changed from
its native condition after the metallization process. Figure 6e shows the untwisting
phenomenon of the yarn due to the cyclic drying process of the knitted fabric during
the metallization procedure. This explains the reason for higher resistance of the
metallized knitted fabric and the lower stability of its electrical resistance during
bending than that of woven fabric.
98 Md. Momtaz Islam et al.
4 Conclusion
In this work, we tried to metallize the cotton-based woven and knitted fabric by
means of cyclewise layer-by-layer coating of metal salts and reducing agent. Woven
fabric shows the resistance 4.5 per inch length, whereas knitted fabric shows resis-
tance 2.8 per inch length. However, in case of durability of maintaining electrical
resistance, woven fabric shows better durability than knitted fabric. Woven fabric has
a tight structure because of the interlacement between the yarns. As a result, it is easy
to grow and fix metal particles between the interlacement points. On the other hand,
knitted fabric shows poor durability due to dimensional instability. The resistance
of woven fabric does not significantly increase due to bending up to 100 cycles,
whereas there is a significant increase in the resistance of knitted fabric. Application
of waterproof coating is desired to improve the durability of both metallized woven
and knitted fabric. The detailed experimental procedures need to be carried on to
understand the durability of the silver-coated textiles. As a continuation of this work,
we are conducting washing, bending, and abrasion resistance test of the presented
samples with varying the concentration of Ag salt and silicon binder. This study
will help to develop a facile and durable integration of conductive (silver/copper)
materials on textile platform.
References
1. Kim, I., Cho, G.: Polyurethane nanofiber strain sensors via in-situ polymerization of polypyrrole
and application to monitoring joint flexion. Smart Mater. Struct. 27, 075006 (2018). https://
doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/aac0b2
2. Harifi, T., Montazer, M.: Application of nanotechnology in sports clothing and flooring for
enhanced sport activities, performance, efficiency and comfort: a review. J. Ind. Text. 46,
1147–1169 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/1528083715601512
3. Commission, E.: Textiles and Clothing. (1998)
4. Steim, R., Chabrecek, P., Sonderegger, U., Kindle-Hasse, B., Siefert, W., Kroyer, T., Reinecke,
P., Lanz, T., Geiger, T., Hany, R., Nüesch, F.: Laminated fabric as top electrode for organic
photovoltaics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 106, 51 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4919940
5. Salvado, R., Loss, C., Gon, R., Pinho, P.: Textile materials for the design of wearable antennas:
a survey. Sensors 12, 15841–15857 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3390/s121115841
6. Shahariar, H., Soewardiman, H., Muchler, C.A., Adams, J.J., Jur, J.S.: Porous textile antenna
designs for improved wearability. Smart Mater. Struct. 27, 4 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/
1361-665X/aaaf91
7. Shahariar, H., Soewardiman, H., Jur, J.S. (2017) Fabrication and packaging of flexible and
breathable patch antennas on textiles. In: Conference Proceedings IEEE SOUTHEASTCON
(2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/secon.2017.7925306
8. Chen, T., Qiu, L., Yang, Z., Peng, H.: Novel solar cells in a wire format. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42,
5031 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cs35465b
Facile Metallization Technique of Textiles for Electronic … 99
9. Das, A., Krishnasamy, J., Alagirusamy, R., Basu, A.: Electromagnetic interference shielding
effectiveness of SS/PET hybrid yarn incorporated woven fabrics. Fibers Polym. 15, 169–174
(2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-014-0169-0
10. Jung, S., Lee, J., Hyeon, T., Lee, M., Kim, D.H.: Fabric-based integrated energy devices for
wearable activity monitors. Adv. Mater. 26, 6329–6334 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.
201402439
11. Doganay, D., Coskun, S., Genlik, S.P.: Silver nanowire decorated heatable textiles. Nanotech-
nology. 27, 1–8 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/27/43/435201
12. Hamedi, B.M., Herlogsson, L., Crispin, X., Marcilla, R.: Fiber-embedded electrolyte-gated
field-effect transistors for e-textiles. 573–577 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200802681
13. Magdassi, S., Grouchko, M., Kamyshny, A.: Copper nanoparticles for printed electronics:
routes towards achieving oxidation stability. Mater. (Basel). 3, 4626–4638 (2010). https://doi.
org/10.3390/ma3094626
14. Song, K.C., Lee, S.M., Park, T.S., Lee, B.S.: Preparation of colloidal silver nanoparticles by
chemical reduction method. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 26, 153–155 (2009). https://doi.org/10.
1007/s11814-009-0024-y
15. Tarafdar, J.C., Raliya, R., Rathore, I.: Microbial synthesis of phosphorous nanoparticle from tri-
calcium phosphate using aspergillus tubingensis TFR-5. J. Bionanoscience. 6, 84–89 (2012).
https://doi.org/10.1166/jbns.2012.1077
16. Umer, A., Naveed, S., Ramzan, N., Rafique, M.S.: Selection of a suitable method for
the synthesis of copper nanoparticles. NANO 07, 1230005 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1142/
S1793292012300058
17. Shahariar, H., Jur, J.S.: Correlation of printing faults with the RF characteristics of coplanar
waveguides (CPWs) printed on nonwoven textiles. Sens. Actuators, A Phys. 273, 240–248
(2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2018.02.043
18. Hamedi, M., Forchheimer, R., Inganäs, O.: Towards woven logic from organic electronic fibres.
Nat. Mater. 6, 357–362 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1884
19. Polte, J., Ahner, T.T., Delissen, F., Sokolov, S.: Mechanism of gold nanoparticle formation in the
classical citrate synthesis method derived from coupled in situ XANES and SAXS evaluation.
Jacs. 132, 1296–1301 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja906506j