You are on page 1of 6

A Study of Failure Mechanisms in CMOS & BJT ICs

and Their Effect on Device Reliability.

M.G.Rajesh', Gopika Vinod#, D.Das', P.V.Bhatnagar' Aditya Thaduri and A.K.Venna


and C.K.Pithawa' Department of Electrical Engineering, IIT Bombay
*Electronics Division, 'Reactor Safety Division,
BARC, Mumbai, India.

Abstract consideration. Taguchi method is usually employed for finding


The reliability of electronic systems, used in nuclear power plants, is the dominant failure mechanisms in semiconductor devices. By
traditionally estimated with empirical databases such as MIL­
Physics of Failure approach, the factors that affect the
HDBK-217, PRISM etc. These methods assign a constant failure
performance of environmental and electrical parameters with
rate to electronic devices, during their useful life. Currently,
their respective stress levels are identified. By constructing
electronic reliability prediction is moving towards applying the
Physics of Failure approach which considers information on
Taguchi array with these parameters, where output parameters
process, technology, fabrication techniques, materials used, etc. decide the effect of top two dominant failure mechanisms, their
The constant failure rate assumption stems from treating failures as influence on chance of failure can be predicted. This analysis
random events. Electronics division of BARC is engaged in design helps us in making the appropriate modifications considering
& fabrication of CMOS and BJT ICs for nuclear pulse processing both the failure mechanisms for the reliability growth of these
and signal conditioning. New microelectronic devices often exhibit devices. This paper highlights the application of design of
infant mortality and wear-out phenomena while in operation. It
experiments for establishing the dominant failure mechanisms
points to competing degradation mechanisms-electro migration,
towards using Physics of Failure approach in electronic
hot carrier injection, dielectric breakdown etc.-that make a device's
reliability prediction.
useful life different from that predicted by empirical methods.
Understanding the dominant mechanisms that lead to device
failure -Physics of Failure-- is a more realistic approach to II. FAILURE MECHANISMS
reliability prediction. This paper describes common failure
mechanisms- encountered in CMOS and BJT ICs and the efforts The most prominent failure mechanisms for CMOS and BJT
being taken to quantify these effects in an optical-isolator IC -4N36- technology are Hot Carrier Injection (HCI), Electromigration,
which forms a part of the trip generation circuit in neutron flux Temperature Dependent Dielectric Breakdown and Negative
monitoring systems.
Bias Temperature Instability [1-4]. Other mechanisms include
Stress Migration, Radiation effects, Corrosion and thermal &
Keywords- Reliability; Optocoupler; Failure Mechanism; Design of
vibration induced fatigue.
experiments; Physics of failure.

A. Electro Migration (EM)


I. INTRODUCTION
Failure occurs mainly due to the blocking (or voiding) of
interconnects due to transport momentum at conductor-metal
Industries employ different technologies like CMOS, BJT and
interface. Sometimes atoms of one conductor pile up against
BICMOS for various applications. The possibility of failure at
another conductor to cause short-circuit (Hillock Failure or
interdependencies of materials, processes, and characteristics
Whisker failure). Electro migration happens mostly at higher
under operating conditions is the major concern which affects
current densities (> lOS A/cm2) and elevated temperatures.
the performance of electronic devices. Failure models of these
devices should address failure mechanisms at various stages Activation energy for this mechanism is around 0.5 - 0.8 eV. In
such as wafer, interconnect, package and assembly. The Al wires and interconnects diffusion of atoms across grain
boundaries leads to electro migration. In Cu wires surface
dominant failure mechanisms and stress parameters need to be
identified. diffusion dominates. Joule heating of metallic wires often
precipitate electro migration. Black's Equation describes the
Design of experiments is an efficient and prominent time to fail due to electro migration as:
methodology for finding the reliability of a given device, as the
experiment provides a proof for the hypothesis under MTTF=ACr)e(�) (1)

978-1-4244-8343-3/10/$26.00 ©2010 IEEE 425


2010:r International Conference on Reliability, Safety & Hazard (ICRESH-201O)

Where J is current density in the conductor, K is Boltzman's temperature dependence and Eox = electric field across the
constant, T is temperature in Kelvin. Aluminium (Ea = 0.6+/- dielectric
0.1eV) has good conductivity and provides good electrical
contacts and adherence to substrate. Copper is more robust with C. Hot Carrier Injection
respect to electro migration due to higher activation energy and Current carriers gain sufficient energy to cross silicon-silica
better conductivity. Activation energy increases by adding 1% interface when electric field is applied. Current micro-electronic
palladium to Al or Cu interconnects. EM damage is proportional devices feature a ultra thin oxide layers that lead to large electric
to current density & decreasing sizes of grain boundaries. If the fields when operating voltages are applied. It happens when
grain size exceeds the width of conductor (bamboo wires),better carriers travel along the channel of a MOSFET (near the drain
resistance to electro migration is often displayed. LA Blech had end, when devices switch states) or when a BJT device is under
described a condition that makes wires survive electro migration reverse bias (along the passivation layer in a base-emitter
if the product of current density and wire length is less than a junction). The carriers injected to oxide layer form charge traps
process dependent threshold [4]. and interface states. HCI manifests as changes in gate threshold
voltage, trans-conductance or saturation current, eventually
B. Temperature Dependent Dielectric Breakdown leading to severe performance degradation [3].The failure
The oxide film which forms the dielectric in MOS devices fails models that describe Hot Carrier Injection are described below:
shorting the anode and cathode due to the application of electric i. Drain Avalanche Hot Carrier-DAHC-injection
field. Time to failure decreases with increasing intensity electric Electrons injected from source end of a MOSFET lead
field and temperature. Two failure models are used to study to impact ionization at the drain end because of high electric
TDDB. Decrease in the activation energy leads to electron fields. In this process electron-hole pairs, having sufficient
reaction rate [2]. energy to cross over to gate oxide film are generated.
ii. Channel Hot Electron injection
E-Model: Large electric fields «10 MV/cm) accelerate field iii. Secondary Generated Hot Electron- SGHE-injection
enhanced thermal bond breakage at silicon-silica interface. The lV. Substrate Hot Electron- SHE-injection
E-field serves to reduce the activation energy required for
thermal bond breakage and therefore exponentially increases the t=CxIsub·m and t=Axe·BNds are the time to fail models, where Isub
reaction rate for failure. is the substrate current, m and B are experimentally determined
constants and Vds is the drain to source potential.
MTTF=AxlO.PExe (��) (2)

� is called temperature dependent field acceleration parameter HCI is dominant at lower temperatures [1]. Lower temperatures
and E is the electric field across the oxide film. lead to charge carriers being localized to the negatively charged
degraded region due to lower thermal energy. Hot carrier
The electric field across oxide film causes injection of holes on degradation decreases at elevated temperatures due to reduction
anode side causing traps. As trap density increases in oxide, of mean free path.
leakage current also increases, which eventually leads to gate
oxide to break down. Degradation caused by HCI is numerically given as

lIE Model: The cause of TDDB, even at low fields, is said to be P parameter of interest (Gm,Vth,I,.J
due to current through the dielectric by Fowler-Nordheim (FN) A material dependent parameter
conduction. F-N injected electrons (from the cathode) cause t time
impact ionization damage of the dielectric as they accelerate n empirically determined exponent which is a function
through the dielectric. of stressing voltage, temperature and effective
transistor channel length
Accelerated electrons may produce holes when they reach
anode. The holes tunnel back to dielectric causing damage. D. Negative Bias Temperature Instability (Slow Trap)
NBTI occurs chiefly in p-MOS devices stressed with a negative
Time to failure shows an exponential dependence on the inverse gate voltage at elevated temperatures. Holes are thermally
of electric field intensity. activated to dissociate from defects Si02-substrate interface,
G(T)
( )
Eox (3) where they are trapped. It happens in a lightly doped drain
TF =
7:0 (T)e
structure. NBTI manifests as decrease in absolute drain current
't"o(T) =a temperature dependent pre-factor,- 1 x 10-11 sec and trans-conductance while the absolute off current and
G = field acceleration parameter, - 350 MY/cm with a weak threshold voltage increase. The stress conditions that precipitate

426
2010 2"" International Conference on Reliability, Safety & Hazard (ICRESH-201O)

NBTI are temperatures of 100-250 degree Celsius and oxide performance. A significant improvement in coupler reliability
electric fields below 6 MVfcm. has been reported through improvements in die geometry,
Two models are used to explain NBTI mechanism: coupling efficiency, metallization techniques, junction coating
Hole injection into the oxide film by avalanche mechanism and techniques thus stabilizing long-term output.
thermally assisted electron tunneling.
C. Optocoupler Output (Photo-Transistor)
A change in threshold voltage caused by NBTI can be given as Optocouplers are available with a variety of outputs like bipolar
transistors, MOS, SCR with different ratings to suit particular
(4)
applications. There is slow change in the electrical parameters
Where fl and f2 are functions describing time dependence & over time when voltage is applied. Change is extreme at 100
gate voltage dependence. Time dependence on Vth can be degree Celsius with voltages above lKV. This is due to the
logarithmic (Log (t)) or power law based (t"), which is release of charge carriers which results in change of gain, reverse
determined experimentally. current and reverse voltage where direction of electric field is
important. To improve characteristics,pn junctions are protected
III. STUDY, OPERATION AND TESTING OF 4N36 OPTO­ by transparent ion screen.
COUPLERS
A. Introduction D. Experimental Setup
An Opto-coupler (Fig. 1) or optoisolator allows two circuits to 4N36 is an optocoupler packaged as 6-pin DIP. The pins on the
exchange signals yet remain electrically isolated. It consists of left side refer to LED inputs and on the right side refer to
and LED at the input and photo-transistor at the output and the phototransistor output.
isolation is implemented by light medium [5].

�u (:Iwb;l V;JIl
JPl
�.
:v!-
-...J'v"/---t----+--l

JI'J
PIN I AHOIlt:
2 CATHCOE \�-""'-----'
J 0 CONt.ECllON
� EMil JI::I
r-
·-- l --------�
+w,'
!o .011 r .TOR I------l
,11'4 JP5
6 Hl\SE:

Figure I. Block Diagram of 4N36 Figure 2. Experimental Setup

Current transfer ratio (CTR) is the parameter that matters most to Ageing Tests:
ageing/degradation of opto-couplers. For fixed Vee> CTR is Accelerated wear-out tests are carried out on opto couplers.
defined as inEq. (9) They include LED ageing and ambient temperature effect on
photo-detector.
ICollector
CTR =
(5)
IDiode
Circuit Diagram/or 4N36: Two types of tests are carried out; In
The current transfer ratio (CTR) is the ratio of output current to order to highlight the ageing phenomena CTR is measured
input current. CTR is normally expressed as a percent. CTR is before and after opto couplers are subjected to accelerated
affected by a variety of factors, including LED output power, ageing tests.
hFE of the transistor, temperature, diode current and device
geometry. If all these factors remain constant, the principle cause
of CTR degradation is the degradation/ageing of the input LED.
Other characteristics include Id Vs Vd, transmission speed and
operating temperature range.

B. Optocoupler Input (LED)[8]


The area of greatest concern in optocoupler reliability has been
the performance degradation of infrared LED. The decrease in
LED light output power over current flow affects the Figure 3,Block Diagram for 4N36

427
2010 r'International Conference on Reliability, Safety & Hazard (ICRESH-201O)

Optocoupler Parameter Drift: Ageing tests are carried out on the efficiency of the LED in the optocoupler. Its quantum efficiency
LED and photo-transistor. Two batches of 20 4N36 ICs are (photons emitted per electron of input current) decreases with
subjected to ageing tests on a test-fixture shown in figure-2. time at a constant current. The LED current in Eq (8) consists of
Variation of CTR with respect to the input measurement current two components: diffusion current and a space-charge
on both batches is studied. Degradation of CTR is insignificant recombination current.
when photo-transistor is stressed. LED ageing causes significant
V
degradation of CTR which is more pronounced for smaller If(Vf)=AeqvfIKT +Beq fIKT (8)
currents up to 100 hours. Rate of CTR degradation decreases
after 100 hours. For a constant current input, if recombination current increases,
._a.ldma
then diffusion current, the radiative component, will decrease.
tho JoheR "milD 1m It.. .a This reduction is due to both current density and junction
temperature. In general, emitter current density is a function of
current, junction geometry, resistivity of both the regions of
diode. Junction temperature is a function of coupler packaging,
power dissipation and temperature. As with current density,high
Tj will increase rapidly in proportion with recombination
current. CTR is expressed as given inEq. (9),

CTR=IOlIf( l 00%) =KR11(If,t)�(Ip,t) (9)


Figure 4. Circuit diagram of 4N36
Where K is transmission factor,R is resistivity of photodetector,
Ageing Parameters: 11is quantum efficiency with function of input current and time
LED ageing has been found to be the cause of long term CTR and � is gain of output amplifier as a function of photo current
degradation. Two parameters are selected to stress the LED so as and time
to degrade CTR; temperature and input current. A batch of opto
couplers will be stressed with high LED current under ambient Temperature variation affects the efficiency and gain. The
temperature and another with high temperatures under low LED normalized CTR is given as in Eq. (10)
current.
ilCTR = ill] + ill] ( oln� )+ il�
(10)
Results: The effect of response times is negligible on both the CTR l] l] olnIp �
tests. But CTR degradation is prominent with LED current 1st term: Major contribution to normalized CTR. In general, it is
stress. So it is deduced that LED current is the parameter that negative over time.
most affects CTR degradation.
2nd term: Second order effect of shift in operating point of
Variation ofCTR with current and time: amplifier as efficiency changes.
From the above results, drift in CTR depends on input current
and time. An opto-coupler is deemed to be failed if CTR reduces 3rd term: Negligible effect with change in gain over time.
to 50% of its nominal value.
LindquistModel [6J:
CTR(O)-CTR(t)
D(t)= (6) Lindquist also suggested a model describing the relative (CTR)
CTR(O)
degradation in terms of ageing current and measurement current
Modeling ofOptocouplers ageing [5J: asEq. (11).
Bajenesco proposed a model for optocoupler ageing in terms of
life time,junction temperature and current through LED. D(%)= j(O)-j(t) =l_eqAvIKT (11)
A j(O)
t1
(7)
--

.�
=

Since the transistor life is longer compared to that of LED, the


KTj
Ie
d opto coupler ageing mainly depends on degradation of LED light
Where tl is lifetime, Id is the ageing (LED) current, Ea is output flux.
Activation Energy,Ea 0.15eV, K is Boltzman constant, Tj is
=
�CTR=�j
junction temperature and A is a constant. (1 2)
CTR

The main cause for CTR degradation is the reduction in

428
2010:r International Conference on Reliability, Safety & Hazard (ICRESH-201O)

Where output flux, as in Eq. (13), is a function of efficiency of in response of photo detector or change in gain of output
opto coupler and diffusion current. amplifier all of which are time dependent. The critical cause is
j='11.Idiff ='11.a.eqvIKT (13) the result of electrical and thermal stressing of PN junction.
Assuming degradation mechanism establishes a resistive shunt
Above model suggests that, CTR degradation increases as parallel to active PN Junction. At low values of input current,
measurement current increases. For direct band gap emitters,the shunt path, which offers low resistance, exhibits appreciable
degradation is due to increase in non-radiative component at impact on performance. As current increases further, junction
which flux is measured. Current density J (V) in Eq. 14 is a draws more current.
combination of radiative and non-radiative current densities
Reliability ofoptocouplers:
J(V)= I(V) =aeqAVIKT +yeqAVI2KT (1 4) Reliability of opto couplers is affected by light output of LED,
A assembly area in die attach and wire bond. Opto couplers are
Where a denotes the coefficient of diffusion (Radiation) and y sometimes encapsulated in transparent plastic packages.
denotes the coefficient of recombination current (Non­ Temperature coefficient of expansion and low glass transition
radiation). Taking the boundary values into consideration in temperature of unfilled,clear plastics is much greater than that of
current density equation,by solving,change in y coefficient with other components. Device integrity requires restricted
respect to initial value can be found as Eq.15 temperature range of operation and stronger mechanical
construction; some clear plastics build up mechanical stress on
l1y =- ( J
2 � sinh QI1V +e"'lAV/2K.T -1 (15) the encapsulated parts during curing. This stress has been
yeO) 0 2KT likened to rapid,inconsistent degradation of IRED light output.

Where I; is the ratio of diffusion current to recombination current Although a filled plastic would stop these phenomena, the filler
and is given as in Eq. 16 also spoils the light transmission properties of the plastic. The
(1 6) decrease in quantum efficiency of LEDs is the main reason for
CTR degradation of optocouplers. Other less important causes
of CTR degradation include a decrease in the transmission of the
The degradation-D- of the LED output flux for a given input transparent epoxy, a change in sensitivity of the photodetector
current can be expressed in terms of I; in Eq. 17 and a change in gain of the output amplifier. It is now known that
the rate of CTR degradation is influenced by the materials and
(1+ Ay
J2 processing techniques used to manufacture LED, junction
D(%) = - yeO) 41;0 (1;0+1) temperature and current density through the LED.
1+ -1 (17)
1
100 41;02 ( J2
1+ Ay Iv. DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS
yeO)
where: Ay=y(t)-y(O) & I; is the I; value at y(O) and V(O). Suppose, Input current to LED is the dominant parameter that causes
change in y is proportional to current, dy/dt b.I" then the drift
=
degradation ofCTR for opto couplers. Temperature is the second
model ofCTR is expressed in Eq (18) dominant parameter that degrades CTR. Other parameters like
radiation effects [9] and humidity are of negligible influence.
2
(
1+ b I,.
. t )2 j ( 1)
) Statistically, the effect of both the stress parameters is not
quantified. To define this,the Design of Experiments by Taguchi
t I"Im) 1-
ACTR(, YcO) 1+ 4.Co JC Co JC+ -1 (1 8)
2 2 method is implemented which involves screening of stress
CTR 40C Im
. (
1+ _0_
b I ,_0t ) parameters. It gives the statistical measure of amount of SIN
yeO) (signal to noise ratio) generated by specific parameter at specific
Where t = time in hours, I, = ageing current in A, I", =
level. This also helps in choosing the design parameter for
measurement current in A, y (0) = =
I12
1O-12A, C 80A and b =
extented MTTF of the item.
constant related to optocoupler
Extended TaguchiMethod [1 OJ:
Cause ofCTR Degradation: Item: 4N36 (If: lO rnA, 25C,CTR = 1 00) Ir= (0, 100mA) and T (-
Total photon flux emitted by LED degrades slightly over 55,150C)
operating time of the device. At higher stress currents, change of
light output increased over time. Causes include reduction in Failure Mechanisms: LED ageing stress parameters: Input LED
emitter efficiency, decrease in transmission ratio, and reduction current and Temperature.

429
20l0:r International Conference on Reliability, Safety & Hazard (ICRESH-201O)

V. CONCLUSIONS
Levels: Ir (H:70rnA; L: lOrnA) and T (H: lOOC,L: 30C)
Samples: For each run, n 5 sampels are selected.
= In this paper, the dominant failure mechanisms that are
Measurement Paremeter: CTR is calculated by measuring responsible for the degradation of performance of ICs are
currents on both input and output. Bigger is better (B-Type illustrated. A detailed study, operation and reliability modeling
Statistics). of an optocoupler 4N36 is carried out. LED ageing is responsible
for the degradation of CTR of optocoupler and it is due to
Using the above two level parameters, L4 Array is constructed as increase in the input current and temperature. Statiscal analysis
in Table I. using design of experiments is carried out for screening of stress
TABLE 1. IA ARRAy
parameters and also for selection of the stress parameter level for
increase in the CTR. The dominant failure mechanism that
Run No: A(Irl B(f) AXB affects the performance is found to be CTR degradation due to
1 1 1 1 LED input current.
2 1 2 2
REFERENCES
3 2 1 2

4 2 2 1 [1] Semiconductor Device Reliability Failure Models SemaTech,AMD,2000


[2] Electronic circuit reliability modeling Joseph, Moshe, Univ of Maryland,
2006,Elsevier,ScienceDirect
The average of CTR is [3] Sony Quality and Reliability Handbook.

Yl+Y2+Y3+Y4+Y5 (19) [4] Renesas Semiconductor Reliability.


Y =

[5] Study and modelling of optocouplers Ageing, lB.H. Slama, H.Helali,


n
A.Lahyani, K.Louati, P.Venet and G.Rojat, Automation and Systems
Signal to Noise Ratio is defIned as SIN = -IOlog M SD where Engineering
[6] A New model for light output degradation of direct band gap emitters.
P.F.Lindquist,HP,1980
[7] Ageing Problem of optocouplers. I.Bajenesco. IEEE 1944
[8] Manufacturing and Reliability of optocouplers, Vishay Semiconductors,
2006.
Where Yy Average of
= YAVO value for that level. [9] Radiation Characterization and Test Methodology Study of Optocouplers
By calculating results table and response table, effects of both Devices for Space Applications,Mangeret,Bonara,2002
stress parameters are quantified and the parameter that most [10] Reliability improvement with design of experiments, 2nd edn, Lloyd W.
Condra
influences CTR is determined.

430

You might also like