You are on page 1of 2

2019 IEEE 8th Global Conference on Consumer Electronics (GCCE)

Synchronization Mechanism for Collision and Against


Collision in Densely Deployed Wireless LANs

Kensuke Hiroshima Tutomu Murase


Nagoya University Nagoya University
Nagoya, Japan Nagoya, Japan
hiroshima@net.itc.nagoya-uc.ac.jp tom@itc.nagoya-uc.ac.jp

Abstract — We here propose a novel MAC instead of DCF, SMTC/CI can avoid unfairness of transmission
SMTC/CI (Semi-synchronous Multiple Transmission Control opportunities among wireless LANs.
/ Collision Inference), which achieves high fairness and
throughputs by inducing effective parallel transmissions with II. RELATED WORKS
frame capture effect. The radio interference could disturb The approaches which reduce Min CW [4] is one of the
high-quality communications with fairness, because of the
most powerful ways to improve throughputs due to frame
spreading of mobile wireless LANs such as mobile router and
capture effect, regardless of fairness. These methods are
tethering nodes. Hence, we need an innovative MAC
considering interference among wireless LANs. Frame significantly effective on specific situations where radio
capture effect is the key factor in order to improve quality of interference among each wireless LANs can efficiently
communications in dense wireless LANs. SMTC/CI consults utilize frame capture effect. However, the difference of CW
history of frame transmissions in order to infer the effective values has the potential which incurs the gap of obtaining
collisions due to frame capture effect, then maintain superior transmission opportunities among network hosts due to
synchronous transmissions. As a result of our simulation, variance of policy between OBSSs (Overlapping BSS). As
throughput is improved up to 112% compared with an example to solve this problem, an arbitration between
conventional MAC. wireless LANs can be considered. Although, this idea has
dis-advantage of communication overheads, decreasing
Keywords — Wireless LAN , Medium Access Control parallel transmission opportunities, and so on.
(MAC),Frame capture effect,IEEE 802.11g
SRB (Semi Random Back-off)[5] is an epochal MAC
I. INTRODUCTION which can avoid frame collisions by TDMA manner in
CSMA/CA without a management station nor
Higher throughputs and higher fairness are desired in communications between hosts. In order to avoid frame
wireless LAN communications for future rich applications. collisions between hosts, SRB uses a fixed back-off time if
So far, many idea have been proposed in order to achieve it. and only if transmissions are successful. Hence,
For example, frame aggregation control in IEEE 802.11n [1, transmission opportunities between hosts become equal,
2], CW (Contention Window) control in DCF (Distributed and frame collisions become prevented. Thus, SRB
Coordination Function) [3, 4], and so on. However, while achieves high throughput and fairness. However, SRB does
many MACs (Medium Access Control) for a single wireless not efficiently work in OBSS. This is because SRB avoids
LAN have been proposed, there are not many considering all frame collisions even if the collisions result in parallel
interference among wireless LANs. In the situation where successful transmissions due to frame capture effect.
multiple wireless LANs interfere, connection is possible but
comfortable communication may not always be guaranteed. We propose an advanced MAC, SMTC/CI, which
Hence, it is extremely significant to consider the MAC for improves high throughput and fairness with utilizing frame
dense wireless LANs. capture effect, while adapting to various situations flexibly.
Note that we define fairness in dense wireless LANs is
We here propose a novel MAC instead of DCF, SMTC/CI “throughput of each station of all wireless LANs are equal”.
(Semi-synchronous Multiple Transmission Control /
Collision Inference), which achieves high fairness and III. PROPOSED METHOD
throughputs by inducing effective parallel transmissions
In this section, we propose a new MAC, SMTC/CI.
with frame capture effect. The concept of SMTC/CI is based
SMTC/CI attempts to synchronize a frame transmission
on synchronizing transmission opportunities between
opportunities between wireless LANs without management
wireless LANs. Especially, SMTC/CI refers the history of
stations while avoiding internal frame collisions in a
frame transmission results in order to distinguish efficient
wireless LAN. SMTC/CI infers effective frame collisions in
frame capture effect while transmitting.
the process of transmitting. Then, such frame transmission
SMTC/CI maintains fairness using with static CW values. opportunities are synchronized in order to continue parallel
Dynamic CW control could incur unfairness due to a transmitting with frame capture effect.
difference of obtaining transmission opportunities between
The ideas of SMTC/CI are as follows.
BSSs (Basic Service Set). Considering that unspecified
users build a wireless LAN system such as a mobile wireless (i). When the frame transmitting is good, the next
LAN, the gap of obtaining transmission opportunities transmission opportunity also matches in order to
among wireless LANs becomes a serious problem, for all continue parallel transmitting. Otherwise, next
users to communicate comfortably. On the other hand, transmission opportunity is reconsidered randomly;
SMTC/CI uses static CW values. Therefore, network hosts performed as same as CSMA/CA.
can equally obtain transmission opportunities. Hence,
(ii). Infer what the frame transmitting is good or else.

XXX-X-XXXX-XXXX-X/XX/$XX.00 ©20XX IEEE

717 on May 17,2020


Authorized licensed use limited to: Fondren Library Rice University. Downloaded 978-1-7281-3575-5/19/$31.00
at 01:08:05 UTC from IEEE Xplore. ©2019 IEEE
Restrictions apply.
In the case of (i), for synchronization of frame transmission Table 1. Simulation parameters
opportunities, SMTC/CI behaves deterministic back-off as
Tx. Power 10 dBm
same as SRB if the state of transmitting is good. All
transmitting hosts use fixed back-off time for successful CCA Level -82 dBm
transmissions. Hence, the parallel transmissions continue Distance between AP and STA 0.3 m
permanently as long as transmissions are succeeded. As the Standard IEEE 802.11g
results, throughputs are improved due to frame capture Transmission Rate (fixed) 54 Mbps
effect. The way how to distinguish that the state of Traffic Saturated UDP
transmitting is good or else, is mentioned later. Payload 1472 Bytes
In the case of (ii), the states of transmitting are inferred RTS/CTS Off
using statistical indicators. SMTC/CI does not react Propagation Loss Model Log distance
immediately depending on transmission successful or failed Exponential Propagation Loss
3.0
of just one transmission. In the case of a frame transmission Coefficient
failed: if frame collisions are occurred, SMTC/CI decides Fading Model Rice-Nakagami
probabilistically to maintain synchronizing or not by
referring to the transmission history. The reason for
stochastically determining the back-off behavior is to avoid 1
loss of synchronization due to fading or the like. In addition, 100

Total throughput [Mbps]


SMTC/CI includes the ides of binary exponential back-off
80
of CSMA/CA in order to secure fairness at a congestion

Fairness Index
( refer to (i) ). Therefore, the same performance equivalent
60
of CSMA/CA is kept if the bandwidth increase due to frame 0.5
capture effect becomes a limit. 40
IV. PERFOMANCE EVALUATION DCF ACW
20
SRB SMTC/CI
We suppose a simple model for performance evaluation SMTC/CI(FI)
with network simulator ns-3 in order to measure basic 0 0
characteristics of SMTC/CI. Consider 3 wireless LANs with 0 20 40 60 80 100
one station (STA) arranged in a regular triangle on the Distance between WLANs [m]
Euclid plane, then define that the distance between wireless Fig. 1 Distance between wireless LANs vs.
LANs is the length of one side of the regular triangle. In this throughputs and fairness
paper, we assume a mobile wireless LAN where its STA is
close to the AP as seen in tethering or mobile router usage.
For simplicity, this study supposes one-way saturated UDP We evaluated the distance between wireless LANs vs. the
traffic from STA to AP. We consider IEEE 802.11g with total throughput and fairness. Compared with the
54Mbps. Detailed parameters are shown in Table 1. conventional methods, SMTC/CI succeeds in improving
the total throughput up to about 112% compared to the
In order to show the effectiveness of SMTC/CI, we conventional methods while maintaining the fairness at the
compared with scheme (1) DCF, (2) SRB[5] and (3) wireless LAN distance of around 15-30 m.
Adaptive CWmin control (ACW) [4]. The fixed value of
deterministic back-off in SMTC/CI and SRB applied 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT
which is the average of CWmin specified in IEEE 802.11g, A part of the research in this paper is supported through
then CWmax use 1023. Grants-in-aid for Scientific Research (19H04093).
Figure 1 shows the relationship between the distance REFERENCES
between wireless LANs and throughputs as well as fairness.
SMTC/CI improves throughputs about 19% compared to [1] M. Adnan and E.-C. Park, “Hybrid control of contention window
and frame aggregation for performance enhancement in multirate
DCF at very short distances between wireless LANs of 1 to WLANs,” Mobile Information Systems, vol. 2015, Article ID
5 m: where frame capture effects is not obtained. On the 383081, 16 pages, 2015.
other hand, in the distance of 15 to 30 m, throughputs are [2] T. Yagi and T. Murase,“Frame Aggregation Control for High
improved by up to about 112% compared to DCF and up to Throughput and Fairness in Densely Deployed WLANs,“ ACM
about 44% compared to SRB. Furthermore, the throughputs International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management
improvement of about 24% compared to AWC is obtained and Communication (IMCOM 2019), Springer, Jan. 2019.
around 30 m where the gain of parallel transmission is the [3] X. Tian, X. Chen, T. Ideguchi, and Y. Fang, “Improving throughput
and fairness in WLANs through dynamically optimizing backoff,”
most. In addition, SMTC / CI can maintain high fairness of IEICE Trans. Commun., vol. E88-B, no. 11, pp. 4328–4338, Nov.
0.99 or more at any distance. 2005.
[4] K. Takahashi, H. Obata, T. Murase and K. Ishida ”Throughput
V. CONCLUSION Improvement Method Exploiting Capture Effect in Densely Placed
In this paper, we proposed SMTC/CI to improve the total WLANs,” IMCOM 2015, Jan. 2015.
throughputs while maintaining the fairness in dense [5] H. Yong, S. Jie, M. Xiaojun, Athanasios V. Vasilakos, Y. Ruixi and
G. Weibo, “Semi-Random Backoff: Towards Resource Reservation
wireless LANs. SMTC/CI incorporates a synchronous for Channel Access in Wirele ss LANs,” IEEE/ACM Trans. on Net.
communication system on CSMA/CA which infers the 21, 1, pp.204–217, 2013.
cause of transmissions failed by referring to the frame
transmission history and determines whether to continue
synchronization.

718 on May 17,2020 at 01:08:05 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Fondren Library Rice University. Downloaded

You might also like