Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
When your students have finished studying this chapter, they should be able to:
2. Measure and mathematically express cost functions and use them to predict costs.
4. Measure cost behavior using the engineering analysis, account analysis, high-low,
visual-fit, and least-squares regression methods.
EXERCISES
PROBLEMS
INTERNET EXERCISE
Accountants and managers assume that cost behavior is linear over some relevant
range of activities or change in cost drivers. Linear-Cost Behavior—graphed with a
straight line when a cost changes proportionately with changes in a single cost
driver. Volume of a product produced or service provided is the primary driver for
some costs (e.g., printing labor, ink, paper, and binding costs of producing the
textbook). Other costs are more affected by activities not directly related to volume
and often have multiple cost drivers. These costs are not easily identified with or
traced to units of output (e.g., the salaries of the editorial staff of the publisher of the
text).
In practice, many organizations use a single cost driver to describe each cost even
though many have multiple causes. Careful use of linear-cost behavior with a single
cost driver often provides cost estimates that are accurate enough for most decisions,
though each cost may have a different cost driver. The use of linear cost behavior
may be justified on cost-benefit grounds. See EXHIBIT 3-1 for a graph of linear-
cost behavior, the relevant range, and an activity or resource cost driver level.
Y = F + VX where:
Y = Total cost
F = Fixed cost
V = Variable cost
X = Cost-driver
For many years, most organizations used only one cost driver: the
amount of direct labor. However, previously "hidden" activities greatly
influence cost behavior. Activities related to the complexity of performing
tasks affect costs more directly than labor usage or other volume-related
activity measures.
These methods rely on the use of past cost data to predict costs. These
methods may not be particularly useful in predicting costs for changing
organizations. If these methods are used, the cost analyst must be careful that
the historical data that is from a past environment is not obsolete. Historical
data may hide past inefficiencies that could be reduced if they are identified.
Learning Objective 1
a. technology decisions
b. product and service decisions
c. capacity decisions
d. only A and B
e. A, B and C
Learning Objective 2
a. slope
b. dependent variable
c. intercept
d. independent variable
Learning Objective 3
a. Apple Inc.
b. Google
a. predict costs
b. be plausible
c. be reliable
d. have benefits that outweigh the costs
e. A, B, and C
e f. only A and D
g. A, B, C, and D
Learning Objective 4
7. The cafeteria department at Tonka Center incurred the following costs for September
20x7:
The cafeteria served 12,500 meals during the month. Using an account analysis to
classify costs, the cost function for Olmstead’s cafeteria department is _____ per
meal.
a. $20,000 + $1.62
b. $20,000 + $3.52
c. $44,000 + $1.60
d. $44,000 + $3.52
8. Using the high-low method of cost estimation, the variable cost per meal served is
_____.
a. $ 2.666
b. $ 2.76
c. $ 3.54
d. $ 3.50
9. The estimate of the fixed costs of running the cafeteria department using the high-
low method is _____.
a. $ 1,000
b. $ 630
c. $ 10,733
d. $ 10,928
10. The cost function derived using the high-low method, which can be used to estimate
the costs of running the cafeteria is _____.
a. $1,000 + $3.50X
b. $10,733 + $2.666X
c. $630 + X
d. $10,928 + $2.76X
e. $10,733 + $2.76
11. Bolt Corp. used regression analysis to predict the annual cost of indirect materials.
The results were as follows:
Constant $21,890
Std Err of Y Est $ 4,560
R Squared 0.7832
Number of Observations 22
X Coefficient(s) 11.75
Std Err of Coef. 2.1876
a. Y = $20,100 + $4.60X
b. Y = $21,890 + $11.75X
c. Y = $21,300 + $2.1876X
d. Y = $ 4,560 + $5.15X
1. [e]
2. [a]
3. [d]
4. [c]
5. [d]
6. [g]
7. [b] In order to answer this problem, the costs must first be classified as
fixed or variable in relation to the cost driver. In this case, the supervisor’s
salary ($9,000 per month) and the equipment depreciation and rental ($11,000
per month) are fixed, whereas the remaining costs ($44,000) vary with the
number of meals served. Dividing the variable costs by the number of meals
served gives $3.52 per meal, and the department’s cost function is $20,000 +
$3.52 per meal.
8. [d] The data for January and August are used because 8,800 is the low
level of activity for the data set and 12,000 is the high level of meals served.
Subtracting the cost for the low activity level from the cost at the high activity
level gives $11,200 ($43,000 – $31,800). Dividing this by the difference in
the activity levels of 3,200 meals (12,000 – 8,800) gives a rate of $3.50 per
meal.
9. [a] Using the variable cost per meal found above of $3.50 and the low
level of activity of 8,800 meals, the variable cost at that activity level is
$30,800. Because the total cost of operating the cafeteria when 8,800 meals
were served is $31,800, $1,000 is the estimate of fixed costs ($31,800 –
$30,800). The variable cost per meal could also be multiplied by the high-
activity level 12,000 to get $42,000, which can be deducted from the total
cost at that level of $43,000 to also arrive at the estimate of fixed costs of
$1,000.
10. [a] This answer is constructed using the elements found in answering
questions 8 and 9.
11. [b]