Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Scroggins
487964
-‐
Integrated
Marketing
Communications
An
Analysis
and
Overview
of
the
IMC
Program
Within
Nike
Corporation
Limited
Student
Name
Naomi-‐Jane
Scroggins
Lecturer
Stephen
Lloyd
Paper
IMC
Naomi-‐Jane
Scroggins
1
Introduction
.....................................................................................................
3
2
Nike’s
Integrated
Marketing
Communications
.................................................
3
2.1
Advertising
............................................................................................................
4
2.2
Internet
&
Interactive
Media
.................................................................................
4
2.3
Sponsorships
&
Celebrity
Endorsements
...............................................................
5
3
Integrated
Marketing
Communications
(Defined)
............................................
5
3.1
The
Importance
of
IMC
.........................................................................................
6
3.2
The
relationship
between
brand
strategy
and
IMC
................................................
8
4
IMC
process
and
implementation
.....................................................................
9
5
IMC
as
a
business
process
...............................................................................
10
6
Conclusion
......................................................................................................
10
References
............................................................................................................
12
Page
2
Naomi-‐Jane
Scroggins
1 Introduction
Nike
could
be
classed
as
the
ultimate
sports
brand
of
all
time,
the
brand
that
revolutionised
the
athlethic
footwear
industry.
Two
visionaries
named
Bill
Bowerman
and
Phil
Knight
started
the
company
in
January
1964
(originally
called
Blue
Ribbon
Sports),
amidst
a
handshake,
an
agreement
to
improve
the
quality
of
running
shoes
for
athletes
(Nike
Inc.,
2013).
According
to
Nike
Inc.
(2013)
Bill
a
widely
respected
track
and
field
coach,
and
Phil
a
talented
middle-‐distance
runner,
set
about
to
work
with
Japanese
footwear
maker
Onitsuka
Tiger
as
US
distributors
for
the
footwear
brand.
Whilst
Phil
began
selling
the
footwear
to
athletes
out
the
back
of
his
car;
Bill,
however,
was
frantically
tearing
the
shoes
apart
and
testing
his
creations
on
University
of
Oregon
runners
in
an
effort
to
determine
how
he
could
make
them
lighter
and
better
(Nike
Inc.,
2013).
Determined
to
grow
their
company
and
both
men
working
full
time
jobs,
Bill
and
Phil
employed
their
first
full-‐time
staff
member
in
1965,
a
fellow
runner
and
gentleman
by
the
name
of
Jeff
Johnson.
Johnson
set
about
to
revolutionise
Blue
Ribbon
Sports
with
the
opening
of
its
first
retail
store,
and
the
creation
of
the
company’s
initial
product
brochures,
advertisements
and
marketing
materials.
As
the
relationship
with
Onitsuka
Tiger
began
to
deteriorate,
Bill
and
Phil
felt
they
were
ready
to
break
away
as
distributors
and
were
determined
to
begin
manufacturing
their
own
range
of
athletic
shoes.
Whilst
all
this
change
was
happening
Johnson
decided
to
re-‐brand
the
company
in
1971,
and
this
formed
the
basis
of
the
Nike
brand
we
know
and
love
today
(Nike
Inc.,
2013).
Today
the
Nike
brand
is
famously
recognised
by
the
prominent
Swoosh
logo
and
the
“Just
Do
It”
slogan,
its
defining
brand
trademarks.
As
the
athletic
footwear/apparel
industry
leader
and
a
prominent
manufacturer
of
major
sporting
goods
equipment,
Nike
also
owns
other
subsidiary
brands
such
as
Cole
Haan,
Converse,
Hurley
International,
Jordan
and
Nike
Golf
(Nike
Inc.,
2013).
Nike
is
at
the
forefront
of
adapting
creative
and
innovative
ways
to
connect
with
stakeholders
and
the
company
has
always
understood
the
meaning
of
the
Nike
brand
and
who
it’s
consumers
really
are;
key
factors
behind
the
long-‐standing
success
of
the
company
today.
Analysis
of
the
Nike
brand
provides
valuable
insight
into
the
achievement
of
successful
IMC
programs;
examples
of
which
will
be
analysed
and
discussed
in
detail
to
form
the
basis
and
structure
of
this
report.
Page
3
Naomi-‐Jane
Scroggins
consumers.
Since
the
company
began
advertising
in
1982
(Nike
Inc.,
2013),
Nike
has
continually
evolved
its
advertising
strategies,
and
frequently
adapts
its
preference
of
touch
points
to
create
powerful
and
meaningful
brand
experiences
(Cendrowski,
2012).
Nike
is
adept
at
utilising
both
traditional
mass
media
advertising
as
well
as
online
touch
points
to
construct
comprehensive
and
meaningful
IMC
activities.
2.1 Advertising
For
the
past
20
years,
Nike
has
worked
with
renowned
American
advertising
agency
Wieden
+
Kennedy
(W&K)
for
all
of
the
company’s
advertising
strategies,
a
relationship
that
has
been
attributable
to
the
success
of
both
companies
(Belch
&
Belch,
2012).
Wieden
+
Kennedy
have
been
influential
in
developing
strong
television
and
print
media
campaigns
that
focus
on
sportsmen,
sportswomen
and
athletes
alike,
appealing
to
consumers
on
an
emotional
level
through
transformational
advertising
(Anderson,
1999).
According
to
Belch
&
Belch
(2012
p296)
“transformational
advertising
can
help
differentiate
a
product
or
service
by
making
the
consumption
experience
more
enjoyable
by
suggesting
the
type
of
experiences
consumers
might
have
when
they
consume
the
product
or
service”.
Nike
designs
its
advertisements
to
capitalize
on
consumer’s
emotions
and
emphasise
individual
feelings
such
as
pride,
achievement,
ambition
and
actualisation
(Zazo
&
Seiz,
2013).
Page
4
Naomi-‐Jane
Scroggins
Page
5
Naomi-‐Jane
Scroggins
According
to
Don
Schultz
(2004)
his
explanation
of
IMC
states
that:
“Integrated
marketing
communication
is
a
strategic
business
process
used
to
plan,
develop,
execute
and
evaluate
coordinated,
measurable,
persuasive
brand
communications
programs
over
time
with
consumers,
customers,
prospects,
employees,
associates
and
other
targeted,
relevant
external
and
internal
audiences.
The
goal
is
to
generate
both
short-‐term
financial
returns
and
build
long-‐term
brand
and
shareholder
value
(Schultz,
2004)."
Schultz,
an
original
pioneer
in
the
field
of
IMC
argues
that
the
true
definition
must
fit
what’s
driving
the
current
marketplace,
it
should
reflect
all
audiences
that
are
part
of
the
process,
describe
the
importance
of
metrics
and
measurement,
and
stress
the
strategic
view
of
marketing
communications.
It
will
not
last
forever
but
will
continually
change
and
evolve
as
IMC
does
(Schultz,
2004).
Similarly
the
American
Marketing
Association
(AMA)
defines
IMC
as:
“A
planning
process
designed
to
assure
that
all
brand
contacts
received
by
a
customer
or
prospect
for
a
product,
service,
or
organization
are
relevant
to
that
person
and
consistent
over
time
(AMA,
2013)”.
Although
lacking
any
mention
of
accountability
towards
IMC
activities,
the
AMA’s
definition
does
follow
the
same
message
as
Kliatchko
and
Schultz
whereby
IMC
should
be
seen
as
a
continual
process
for
maximising
brand
engagement
with
stakeholders,
ensuring
relevance
and
consistency
over
time.
Whilst
the
debate
on
defining
IMC
is
likely
to
endure,
what
is
important
is
that
marketers
and
academics
continue
to
adapt
and
redefine
the
concept
of
IMC
in
line
with
contemporary
business
strategies,
technological
advances
and
market
trends.
Page
6
Naomi-‐Jane
Scroggins
In
order
to
develop
effective
and
efficient
marketing
programs
that
project
a
consistent
and
unified
message
for
consumers,
marketers
are
increasingly
adopting
an
IMC
approach
in
order
to
achieve
their
marketing
communications
objectives.
According
to
Belch
&
Belch
(2012),
marketers
understand
the
importance
of
strategically
integrating
communications
functions
in
a
continually
changing
external
environment;
particularly
with
the
advent
of
modern
technology,
frequent
shifts
in
consumer
attitudes
and
media
consumption
behaviour.
Furthermore,
by
integrating
marketing
communications
activities
as
a
whole,
marketers
are
able
to
achieve
more
in
terms
of
value
for
a
brand
than
operating
functions
separately
(Belch
&
Belch,
2012).
Several
explanations
regarding
the
growing
importance
of
IMC
strategies
are
analysed
and
discussed
below.
Increasing
Touch
Points
Traditional
mass
media
channels
such
as
radio,
print
and
television
are
still
widely
used
communication
vehicles
to
engage
with
audiences
when
advertising
products,
services,
and
brands.
However,
consumers
today
are
increasingly
touching
and
interacting
with
brands
in
such
a
diverse
variety
of
methods
beyond
this
(Renzie,
2008).
More
and
more
consumers
are
now
responding
to
word
of
mouth,
internet
and
mobile
applications,
online
social
media
platforms,
celebrity
endorsements
and
direct
marketing
activities
just
to
name
a
few
(Belch
&
Belch,
2012).
It
is
up
to
marketers
to
understand
the
activities
and
behaviour
of
today’s
consumers
in
order
to
achieve
maximum
penetration
of
key
touch
points.
Widespread
Internet
&
Mobile
Engagement
With
the
explosion
in
mobile
and
online
media
technologies,
and
the
ability
for
marketers
to
narrowly
target
consumer
interests,
interacting
and
connecting
with
consumers
extends
far
beyond
Internet
capabilities
of
the
past
(Renzie,
2008).
According
to
Belch
&
Belch
(2012),
marketers
are
now
able
to
communicate
with
their
consumers
at
all
times
through
mobile
applications
and
text
messaging;
search
engine
advertising
including
Google
and
Bing;
social
networking
sites
such
as
Facebook
and
YouTube;
and
targeted
programs
on
cable
television
and
video
on
demand;
blogs
and
company
websites.
Concentrated
Media
Historically,
developing
communications
strategies
through
the
use
of
traditional
mass
media
channels
used
to
be
enough
to
engage
with
consumer
audiences.
Belch
and
Belch
(2012)
point
out
that
due
to
the
proliferation
of
media
and
fragmentation
of
audiences,
consumers
are
increasingly
becoming
tired
of
the
bombardment
of
sales
messages,
are
less
responsive,
and
have
shorter
attention
spans
towards
traditional
advertising.
Marketers
have
recognised
that
in
order
to
combat
Page
7
Naomi-‐Jane
Scroggins
adverse
consumer
attitudes
towards
advertising,
they
have
to
bring
their
messages
to
consumers
in
different
ways
(Belch
&
Belch,
2012).
Consumers
are
now
responding
to
more
specialised
and
concentrated
media
platforms
with
magazines
that
cater
to
sports
fans
and
garden
enthusiasts;
cable
television
and
TV
on
demand;
podcasts,
viral
videos
and
blogging
networks
(Renzie,
2008).
Page
8
Naomi-‐Jane
Scroggins
Page
9
Naomi-‐Jane
Scroggins
6 Conclusion
When
executed
effectively
integrating
marketing
communications
provides
a
valuable
tool
for
communicating
with
internal
and
external
audiences.
The
IMC
concept
helps
marketers
to
streamline
and
maximise
the
communication
process,
aids
marketers
in
achieving
their
strategic
marketing
objectives
and
contributes
to
the
development
and
strengthening
of
brand
identity
and
equity.
IMC
as
a
business
process
guides
marketers
towards
making
improved
promotional-‐mix
decisions
and
is
valuable
in
helps
to
maximise
potential
returns
on
investment.
Page
10
Naomi-‐Jane
Scroggins
Based
on
this
assessment
of
Nike’s
marketing
activities
it
is
clear
to
see
that
IMC
plays
a
key
role
towards
improving
value
for
the
company.
Strategies
are
carefully
developed
to
integrate
with
and
create
dialogue
with
consumers
through
a
variety
of
important
touch
points.
These
strategies
not
only
serve
to
benefit
the
continued
sales
and
success
for
the
company
but
are
also
designed
to
form
a
strong
bond
with
athletic
consumers,
building
on
and
maintaining
the
brand’s
identity
and
equity.
Page
11
Naomi-‐Jane
Scroggins
References
Anderson,
C.
S.
(1999).
Corporate
propoganda
analysis:
A
case
study
of
Nike
Inc.
University
of
North
Texas.
Texas:
UMI
-‐
Dissertations
Publishing.
American
Marketing
Association.
(2013,
Jan
31).
Dictionary.
Retrieved
Jan
31,
2013
from
American
Marketing
Association:http://www.marketingpower.com/_layouts/Dictionary.aspx?dLetter=I
Belch,
G.
E.,
&
Belch,
M.
A.
(2012).
Advertising
and
Promotion:
An
Integrated
Marketing
Communications
Pespective
(9th
Edition
ed.).
New
York:
McGraw-‐Hill.
Cashman,
J.
(2012,
July
27).
How
Nike
is
Killing
It
In
Social
Media
Marketing.
Retrieved
January
31,
2013
from
Digitial
Firefly
Marketing:
http://digitalfireflymarketing.com/how-‐nike-‐killing-‐it-‐
social-‐media-‐marketing
Cendrowski,
S.
(2012).
Nike's
New
Marketing
Mojo.
Fortune
,
165
(3),
80-‐88.
Coucha,
A.
(2011,
August
9).
Slideshre:
Brand
Management
Nike.
Retrieved
January
31,
2013
from
Slideshare:
http://www.slideshare.net/Ahmed_Coucha/brand-‐managment-‐nike-‐building-‐a-‐
global-‐brand-‐case-‐analysis
Goldman,
R.,
&
Papson,
S.
(1998).
Nike
culture:
the
sign
of
the
swoosh.
London:
Sage.
Johnson,
K.
(2013,
January
31).
Why
Nike
uses
endorsements
and
sponsorships.
Retrieved
January
31,
2013
from
E
How:
http://www.ehow.com/about_6465548_nike-‐uses-‐endorsements-‐
sponsorships.html
Keller,
K.
L.
(2008).
Strategic
Brand
Management
(3rd
Edition
ed.).
Upper
Saddle
River,
New
Jersey,
USA:
Pearson
International.
Kitchen,
P.
J.,
Brignell,
J.,
Tao,
L.,
&
Jones,
G.
S.
(2004).
The
Emergence
of
IMC:
A
Theoretical
Perspective.
Journal
of
Advertising
Research
,
44
(1),
19-‐30.
Kliatchko,
J.
(2005).
Towards
a
new
definition
of
Integrated
Marketing
Communications
(IMC).
International
Journal
of
Advertising
,
24
(1),
7-‐34.
Madhavaram,
S.,
Badrinarayanan,
V.,
&
McDonald,
R.
E.
(2005).
Integrated
Marketing
Communication
(IMC)
and
Brand
Identity
as
Critical
Components
of
Brand
Equity
Strategy.
Journal
of
Advertising
,
34
(4),
69-‐80.
Mara,
J.
(2000).
Nike:
Best
Integrated
Campaign.
Brandweek
,
41
(23),
IQ44-‐IQ47.
Nike
Inc.
(2013,
Jan
23).
History
&
Heritage.
Retrieved
Jan
23,
2013
from
Nike
Incorporated:
http://nikeinc.com/pages/history-‐heritage
O'Malley,
G.
(2006).
Who's
leading
the
way
in
web
marketing?
It's
Nike,
of
course.
Advertising
Age
,
77
(42),
D3-‐D3.
Renzie.
(2008,
May
2).
Integrated
Marketing
Communications:
Why
Is
It
So
Important.
Retrieved
Jan
31,
2013
from
Intermedia
Marketing:
Schultz,
D.
E.
(2004).
IMC
receives
more
appropriate
definition.
Marketing
News
,
38
(15),
8-‐9.
http://intermediamarketing.wordpress.com/2008/05/02/integrated-‐marketing-‐communications-‐why-‐
is-‐it-‐so-‐important/
Page
12
Naomi-‐Jane
Scroggins
UK
Essays.
(2013,
January
31).
Nike
-‐
Brand
Equity.
Retrieved
January
31,
2013
from
UKessays.co.uk:
http://www.ukessays.co.uk/essays/marketing/nike-‐brand-‐equity.php
Wasserman,
T.
(2006).
You
Tube.
Brandweek
,
47
(37),
M14-‐M17.
Zazo,
A.,
&
Seiz,
B.
(2013,
January
31).
IMC
Analysis
Paper:
Nike
Plus.
Retrieved
January
31,
2013
from
Strategic
Online
Marketing:
http://anthonyzazo.com/wp-‐content/uploads/2011/01/IMC-‐
Plan-‐Nike-‐Plus.pdf
Page 13