You are on page 1of 6

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2008; 52: 946–951 r 2008 The Authors

Printed in Singapore. All rights reserved Journal compilation r 2008 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation

ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA


doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01599.x

Pre-operative carbohydrate loading may be used in type 2


diabetes patients
U. O. GUSTAFSSON1, J. NYGREN1, A. THORELL1, M. SOOP1, P. M HELLSTRÖM2, O. LJUNGQVIST1 and E. HAGSTRÖM-TOFT1,3
1
Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Centre for Gastrointestinal Disease, Ersta Hospital, Karolinska Institutet,
Stockholm, Sweden, 2Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden and 3Department of
Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden

Background: Post-operative insulin resistance and hyper- paracetamol remained in the stomach in diabetic patients
glycaemia are associated with an impaired outcome after and healthy, subjects respectively. Gastric half-emptying
surgery. Pre-operative oral carbohydrate loading (CHO) time (T50) occurred at 49.8  2.2 min in diabetics and at
reduces post-operative insulin resistance with a reduced 58.6  3.7 min in healthy subjects (Po0.05). Neither peak
risk of hyperglycaemia during post-operative nutrition. glucose, glucose at 180 min, gastric T50, nor retention at
Insulin-resistant diabetic patients have not been given 120 min differed between insulin (HbA1c 6.8  0.7%)- and
CHO because the effects on pre-operative glycaemia and non-insulin-treated (HbA1c 5.6  0.4%) patients.
gastric emptying are unknown. Conclusions: Type 2 diabetic patients showed no signs of
Methods: Twenty-five patients (45–73 years) with type delayed gastric emptying, suggesting that a carbohydrate-
2 diabetes [glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) 6.2  0.2%, mean rich drink may be safely administrated 180 min before
SEM] and 10 healthy control subjects (45–72 years) were studied. anaesthesia without risk of hyperglycaemia or aspiration
A carbohydrate-rich drink (400 ml, 12.5%) was given with pre-operatively.
paracetamol 1.5 g for determination of gastric emptying.
Accepted for publication 20 November 2007
Results: Peak glucose was higher in diabetic patients than
in healthy subjects (13.4  0.5 vs. 7.6  0.5 mM; Po0.01) Key words: Carbohydrate drink; diabetes; ERAS; gastric
and occurred later after intake (60 vs. 30 min; Po0.01). emptying; glucose control; preoperative; surgery.
Glucose concentrations were back to baseline at 180 vs.
120 min in diabetic patients and healthy subjects, respec- r 2008 The Authors
tively (Po0.01). At 120 min, 10.9  0.7% and 13.3  1.2% of Journal compilation r 2008 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation

M ETABOLIC stress and insulin resistance follow


major surgery (1). The resulting post-opera-
tive hyperglycaemia is associated with increased
polymers of carbohydrates to minimize the osmotic
load and thus reducing the gastric emptying time.
The drink, in addition to its metabolic effect,
morbidity as well as mortality (1–3). In non-dia- improves patient well-being (thirst, hunger, anxi-
betic patients, avoiding pre-operative fastening ety) pre-operatively (9).
substantially reduces post-operative stress and in- Patients with diabetes are at particular risk of
sulin resistance. A pre-operative carbohydrate load impaired glycaemic control post-operatively (3).
improves post-operative glycaemic control, most Although a considerable number of patients going
likely by inducing endogenous insulin release be- through surgery suffer from diabetes, this patient
fore the onset of surgery. This sets the metabolic group has been denied the pre-operative carbohy-
state of the patient in a fed rather than a fasted state drate drink because of fear of slow gastric empty-
at the time of surgery (4). Metabolic reactions to ing and impaired glycaemic control (10, 11).
surgical stress are thereby markedly reduced (1, 5) According to cross-sectional studies, gastric
not only resulting in a reduced risk for hypergly- emptying is slower in approximately 30–50% of
caemia during post-operative nutrition but also outpatients with long-standing type 1 or 2 diabetes
retained lean body mass, improved muscle than in normal individuals (12). However, in many
strength and nitrogen economy (6–8). cases the magnitude of the delay seems to be
The oral preparation used is a carbohydrate-rich modest. In contrast, it has also been reported that
(12.5%) clear beverage (CHO) containing mainly gastric emptying rate is increased in type 2 diabetes

946
Pre-operative carbohydrate load in diabetes patients

Table 1
Subject Characteristics.
Diet/OAD-treated Insulin-treated subjects Healthy subjects
subjects (n 5 14) (n 5 11) (n 5 10)
Age, mean (range) 58 (45–73) 63 (50–70) 59 (45–71)
Diabetes duration in years, mean (range) 6.6 (1–14)a 11.6 (6–31) 0
Gender (M/F) (12/2) (5/6) (6/4)
HbA1c % 5.6  0.1ab 6.8  0.2c 4.5  0.1
BMI 27.5  0.9b 29.6  1.0c 24.6  0.9
Fat mass (%) (Bio-impedance) 28.2  1.8a 36.0  2.1c 26.5  2.4
Total insulin dose (U/24h) 54  14

OAD, Oral anti-diabetic drugs. Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) (reference range 3.4–5.0%).
MonoS, Swedish standard. Mean  SEM.
Po0.05, a 5 OAD vs. insulin treated.
b 5 OAD vs. healthy.
c 5 insulin treated vs. healthy.

patients, at least early after onset of the disease. repaglinid (n 5 1), glimeperid (n 5 1)] and four had
Among type 1 diabetes patients, accelerated gastric diet treatment only. None of the patients included
emptying has been shown, however, in a minority showed any symptoms or signs of upper gastro-
of cases (12). Thus, there are conflicting data as to intestinal disease. Ten healthy age- and weight-
gastric emptying in patients with diabetes in gen- matched subjects served as controls (Table 1).
eral, which makes it difficult to provide firm Written informed consent was obtained from
recommendations regarding the use of pre-opera- every participant before the study. The research
tive carbohydrate loading in this patient group. protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethics
The aim of the present study was to explore the Committee at the Karolinska Institutet and was
possibility of providing CHO in patients with carried out in accordance with the Declaration of
diabetes with regard to the potential risk of im- Helsinki of the World Medical Association (1989).
paired glycaemic control and pulmonary aspira-
tion during anaesthesia. Therefore, gastric
emptying and glucose concentrations after the Study design
intake of a carbohydrate-rich drink in patients All patients were fasting from 2200 h the night
with type 2 diabetes and healthy volunteers were before the investigation. Alcohol, heavy meals,
studied. paracetamol intake or strong physical activitiy
were prohibited the day before study. Patients
arrived to the clinic at 07:30 hours. The body
composition was determined with a Bioimpedance
Methods s
analyzer, Tanita , Model TBF-300, Tokyo, Japan,
Twenty-five patients with type 2 diabetes were followed by bed rest until they took their regular
recruited from the outpatient clinic at Ersta hospi- morning medication at 08:00 hours. All patients
tal, Stockholm, Sweden. Inclusion criteria were were then given a 400 ml carbohydrate-rich bev-
glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) o7% (referance erage (12.5 g 100/ml carbohydrates, 12% monosac-
range 3.4–5%, MonoS, Swedish standard) and charides, 12% disaccharides, 76%
s
polysaccharides,
body mass index (BMI) o35 kg/m2 while subjects 285 mOsm/kg, Nutricia Preop , Numico, Zoeterm-
with clinical signs of autonomic neuropathy and/ eer, the Netherlands). Paracetamol, 1.5 g (Alvedon
s
or peripheral sensory/motor neuropathy were ex- Brus , Astra Zeneca, Mölndal, Sweden) was dis-
cluded. Eleven patients were treated with insulin solved in the beverage, for determination of gastric
[bedtime intermediate duration of action insulin emptying. Patients remained in a reclined position
(NPH) (n 5 5), biphasic human insulin 30 and throughout the study period.
bedtime NPH insulin (n 5 2), biphasic insulin lis-
pro 25 and bedtime NPH insulin (n 5 2), biphasic Sampling and chemical analysis. After intake of the
insulin aspart 30 (n 5 2)]. Out of these 11 patients, carbohydrate drink, venous blood samples were
six were concurrently on oral anti-diabetic drugs obtained from an indwelling catheter in the ante-
(OAD) (metformin). Ten of the patients were on cubital vein. Blood glucose concentrations were
OAD only [metformin (n 5 5), glibenklamid (n 5 3), measured at 5 min, at t 5 0 (immediately after

947
U. O. Gustafsson et al.

intake) and then every 30 min during 240-min post- 100

Gastric retention (%)


administration of the carbohydrate-rich drink and 80
analysed by a whole-blood glucose meter 60
s
(Hemocue , Ängelholm, Sweden). Plasma parace-
40
tamol concentration was assessed before adminis-
tration and at 0, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120 and 180 min after 20
intake of fluids. 0
0 15 30 60 90 120 180
Time (min)
Gastric emptying. The gastric emptying rate was
assessed using intestinal paracetamol absorption Fig. 1. Gastric retention (%) after intake of 1.5 g paracetamol
as a marker. Plasma samples were assayed for dissolved in a 400 ml carbohydrate drink. Overall slightly in-
paracetamol by fluorescence -immunoassay (IMX, creased gastric emptying rate in diabetic patients vs. healthy
subjects (Po0.05). White triangles, insulin treated; white squares,
Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL). The coefficient OAD/diet treated; black squares, healthy subjects’.
of variation was  5%. Gastric emptying measured
with the paracetamol absorption technique shows a
correlation to scintigraphic gastric half-emptying 16

B-Glucose (mmol/l)
14
time and plasma concentrations of paracetamol at
12
30 and 60 min (r 5 0.65) as well as peak plasma 10
concentrations of the compound (r 5 0.77) (13). 8
Gastric emptying was evaluated as lag-time until 6
4
2% of the contents were emptied and as half- 2
emptying time (T50) until 50% of the contents 0
were emptied. −5 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240
Time (min)

Fig. 2. Blood glucose concentrations after intake of a 400 ml


Statistical analysis carbohydrate-rich drink. Peak values occurred later in patients
Results are presented as mean  standard error of with diabetes compared with healthy controls and returned to
the mean (SEM) or median and range for groups. baseline after 180 min. ‘White triangles, insulin treated; white
One-way ANOVA and two-way ANOVA for re- squares OAD/diet treated; black squares, healthy subjects.
peated measurements were used when appropri-
ate. A P value of o0.05 was considered to be gastric emptying was slightly faster in diabetic
statistically significant. patients than in healthy subjects (Po0.05).
At 180 min, 100% of the paracetamol was ab-
sorbed in all subjects. T50 and retention after
Results
120 min did not differ between OAD/diet-treated
One insulin-treated patient (female, 70 years of age, and insulin-treated patients. The amount of para-
BMI 23) experienced mild hypoglycaemia at cetamol remaining in the stomach after 120 min
150 min (B-glucose 2.7 mmol/L). The experiment equalled approximately 40 ml of the carbohydrate
was terminated and the patient received oral dex- drink given to all groups.
trose, followed by lunch with rapid normalization
of glucose and symptoms.
Blood glucose concentrations
The fasting glucose concentrations were 6.7  0.2
Gastric emptying and 4.7  0.1 mM in diabetic patients and in
The appearance of paracetamol reflecting emptying healthy subjects, respectively (Po0.01) (Fig. 2).
of fluids followed a close to linear pattern in both In patients with diabetes, peak glucose con-
diabetic patients and healthy subjects (Fig. 1). centrations (13.4  0.5 mM) occurred 60 min after
Gastric half-emptying time (T50) occurred at intake of the carbohydrate drink whereas cor-
49.8  2.2 min in patients with diabetes and at responding values, 7.6  0.5 mM, were achieved
58.6  3.7 min in healthy subjects (Po0.05). At at 30 min in healthy subjects (Po0.01). Glucose
120 min, 10.9  0.7% and 13.3  1.2% of the para- concentrations returned to baseline after 180 min
cetamol given remained in the stomach in diabetic in patients with diabetes and after 120 min in
patients and healthy subjects, respectively. Overall, healthy subjects. Peak blood glucose concentrations

948
Pre-operative carbohydrate load in diabetes patients

and glucose at 180 min did not differ between diabetes seems to affect gastric emptying of solids
OAD/diet-treated and insulin-treated patients decidedly more than for clear fluids and nutrient
(Fig. 2). liquids (19, 20). Furthermore, compared with water
It was not possible to verify any statistically or low-nutrient liquids, high-nutrient liquids show
significant association between gastric half-empty- a delayed and a more linear than exponential
ing time and HbA1c%, fasting glucose values, peak emptying pattern (19–21). The carbohydrate-rich
glucose concentration or gender. beverage used in the present study has a relatively
high nutrient content, which may explain why we
generally found long gastric emptying times in
controls as well as in patients compared with
Discussion
some previous studies (22).
This study did not indicate delayed gastric empty- In order to implement adequate fasting guide-
ing after intake of a 12.5% CHO-rich drink for preo- lines including pre-operative carbohydrate loading
perative use among patients with well-controlled as a routine also for diabetic patients, it would be
type 2 diabetes compared with healthy control advantageous if patients with a reduced gastric
subjects. If anything, a slightly increased gastric emptying rate could be identified. However, phy-
emptying rate was found in the diabetic popula- sical examination and other indirect tests are of
tion. The residual gastric volume 2 h after intake of little value because the correlation between gastric
the drink was similar in healthy subjects compared emptying rate and autonomic neuropathy or upper
with diabetic patients. As expected, peak glucose gastrointestinal symptoms is weak (23–25).
concentrations after carbohydrate intake were The duration of disease is suggested to influence
higher and occurred later in diabetic patients com- the risk of delayed gastric emptying in diabetic
pared with healthy control subjects but they re- patients (12). In the present study, the patients had
turned to baseline after 180 min. a mean diabetes duration of 6.6 years in the OAD/
Even though scintigraphic methods may be con- diet group vs. 11.6 years in the insulin-treated
sidered to be the gold standard when assessing group (Po0.05). Despite the difference in duration
gastric emptying, the technique is expensive and and possible severity of disease, the gastric empty-
involves radiation exposure. The paracetamol ab- ing rate was similar between the two groups of
sorption technique is well established and corre- diabetic patients and, also, not different from
lates well with scintigraphy of liquid phase gastric healthy subjects.
emptying (13, 14). This method was therefore Pre- and post-operative glycaemic control may
chosen for the present study. be important in diabetic patients in order to avoid
Insulin resistance leading to poor glucose control slow gastric emptying. It is known that acute
is a key factor in the development of post-operative elevations in blood glucose concentrations delays-
complications (2). Strict perioperative glucose con- gastric emptying (26–28) in both healthy subjects
trol leads to improved survival with a concomitant and inpatients with diabetes. However, despite the
decrease in the incidence of infections, neuropa- association between glucose levels and gastric
thies and renal failure (2, 15). emptying rates, blood glucose levels per se have
In non-diabetes patients, avoiding pre-operative not been shown to be a reliable predictor of gastric
fasting reduces post-operative insulin resistance by emptying. Moreover, we found no evidence of an
approximately 50% (5, 16, 17) and attenuates post- association between the peak glucose concentration
operative impairment in nitrogen losses, lean body and gastric emptying rates. Thus, measurements
mass and muscle function (6–8). such as gastric emptying of paracetamol or residual
Patients with diabetes mellitus are at risk for gastric volumes are the only reliable options for
post-operative impaired glycaemic control and predicting potential risk patients with regard to
have so far been known to run greater risk of anaesthesia.
complications when subjected to surgery (3, 18) One patient experienced a mild hypoglycaemia
Patients with diabetes might be at risk of delayed during the experiment. This patient was compara-
gastric emptying. For this reason, they have not yet tively lean and old and was treated with a low dose
been given pre-operative carbohydrates. of biphasic insulin aspart, displaying a more in-
The highest prevalence of slow gastric emptying sulin-sensitive phenotype compared with the
is reported from studies where emptying of both other patients investigated. It remains warranted
solids and liquids has been measured. However, to control glucose levels liberally in lean types 2 or

949
U. O. Gustafsson et al.

1 patients during the pre-operative period when 7. Henriksen MG, Hessov I, Dela F et al. Effects of preopera-
adopting the regimen presented here. tive oral carbohydrates and peptides on postoperative
endocrine response, mobilization, nutrition and muscle
Owing to the small sample size, it may be function in abdominal surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
difficult to apply these data safely as a recommen- 2003; 47 (2): 191–9.
dation for all diabetic patients about to undergo 8. Yuill KA, Richardson RA, Davidson HI et al. The admin-
surgery. Nonetheless, the present study indicates istration of an oral carbohydrate-containing fluid prior to
major elective upper-gastrointestinal surgery preserves
that it is safe, within the current fasting guidelines skeletal muscle mass postoperatively – a randomised clin-
(11), to administer a pre-operative carbohydrate ical trial. Clin Nutr 2005; 24 (1): 32–7.
drink to patients with uncomplicated type 2 dia- 9. Hausel J, Nygren J, Lagerkranser M et al. A carbohydrate-
betes pre-operatively. Larger randomized studies rich drink reduces preoperative discomfort in elective
surgery patients. Anesth Analg 2001; 93 (5): 1344–50.
are warranted in order to establish a standard with 10. Park MI, Camilleri M. Gastroparesis: clinical update. Am
a reliable safety level with regard to the risk of J Gastroenterol 2006; 101 (5): 1129–39.
aspiration. Moreover, future studies are needed 11. Soreide E, Eriksson LI, Hirlekar G et al. Pre-operative
to determine whether intake of a pre-operative fasting guidelines: an update. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
2005; 49 (8): 1041–7.
carbohydrate drink has similar effects on metabo- 12. Horowitz M, O’Donovan D, Jones KL et al. Gastric empty-
lism and surgical outcomes among diabetes patients ing in diabetes: clinical significance and treatment. Diabet
as demonstrated previously among non-diabetic Med 2002; 19 (3): 177–94.
patients. 13. Naslund E, Bogefors J, Gryback P et al. Gastric emptying:
comparison of scintigraphic, polyethylene glycol dilution,
and paracetamol tracer assessment techniques. Scand
J Gastroenterol 2000; 35 (4): 375–9.
14. Willems M, Quartero AO, Numans ME. How useful is
paracetamol absorption as a marker of gastric emptying?
Acknowledgements A systematic literature study. Dig Dis Sci 2001; 46 (10):
2256–62.
The authors express their gratitude to Ann-Sofie Andersson, 15. Krinsley JS. Effect of an intensive glucose management
Nina Johansson, Nina Blomme and Robert Lind for excellent protocol on the mortality of critically ill adult patients.
nursing and technical assistance. Preliminary results from this Mayo Clin Proc 2004; 79 (8): 992–1000.
study were reported at the Congress of the European Society of 16. Nygren J, Soop M, Thorell A et al. Preoperative oral
the Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition; Istanbul, Turkey; 2006. carbohydrate administration reduces postoperative insulin
This work was supported by funds from the Swedish Research resistance. Clin Nutr 1998; 17 (2): 65–71.
Council (#09101), The Torsten and Ragnar Söderberg founda- 17. Nygren JO, Thorell A, Soop M et al. Perioperative insulin
tion, Funds from Karolinska Institutet, Sweden, and Royal and glucose infusion maintains normal insulin sensi-
Numico, Holland. tivity after surgery. Am J Physiol 1998; 275 (1 Part 1):
E140–8.
18. Schricker T, Gougeon R, Eberhart L et al. Type 2 diabetes
mellitus and the catabolic response to surgery. Anesthesiol-
ogy 2005; 102 (2): 320–6.
19. Horowitz M, Maddox AF, Wishart JM et al. Relationships
References between oesophageal transit and solid and liquid gastric
emptying in diabetes mellitus. Eur J Nucl Med 1991; 18 (4):
1. Thorell A, Nygren J, Ljungqvist O. Insulin resistance: a 229–34.
marker of surgical stress. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 20. Weytjens C, Keymeulen B, Van Haleweyn C et al. Rapid
1999; 2 (1): 69–78. gastric emptying of a liquid meal in long-term Type 2
2. van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F et al. Intensive diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med 1998; 15 (12): 1022–7.
insulin therapy in the critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 21. Gentilcore D, Hausken T, Horowitz M et al. Measurements
2001; 345 (19): 1359–67. of gastric emptying of low- and high-nutrient liquids using
3. Furnary AP, Zerr KJ, Grunkemeier GL et al. Continuous 3D ultrasonography and scintigraphy in healthy subjects.
intravenous insulin infusion reduces the incidence of deep Neurogastroenterol Motil 2006; 18 (12): 1062–8.
sternal wound infection in diabetic patients after cardiac 22. Jones KL, Russo A, Berry MK et al. A longitudinal study
surgical procedures. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 67 (2): 352–60; of gastric emptying and upper gastrointestinal symptoms
discussion 360–2. in patients with diabetes mellitus. Am J Med 2002; 113 (6):
4. Svanfeldt M, Thorell A, Nygren J et al. Postoperative 449–55.
parenteral nutrition while proactively minimizing insulin 23. Jebbink HJ, Bravenboer B, Akkermans LM et al. Relation-
resistance. Nutrition 2006; 22 (5): 457–64. ships between dyspeptic symptoms and gastrointestinal
5. Soop M, Nygren J, Myrenfors P et al. Preoperative oral motility in patients with type 1 (insulin-dependent) dia-
carbohydrate treatment attenuates immediate postopera- betes mellitus. Diabetologia 1993; 36 (10): 948–54.
tive insulin resistance. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2001; 24. Ziegler D, Schadewaldt P, Pour Mirza A et al. [13C]octanoic
280 (4): E576–83. acid breath test for non-invasive assessment of gastric
6. Crowe PJ, Dennison A, Royle GT. The effect of pre-opera- emptying in diabetic patients: validation and relationship
tive glucose loading on postoperative nitrogen metabolism. to gastric symptoms and cardiovascular autonomic func-
Br J Surg 1984; 71 (8): 635–7. tion. Diabetologia 1996; 39 (7): 823–30.

950
Pre-operative carbohydrate load in diabetes patients

25. Stacher G, Lenglinger J, Bergmann H et al. Impaired gastric delayed gastric emptying in type I diabetes mellitus. Gut
emptying and altered intragastric meal distribution in 1997; 40 (5): 641–6.
diabetes mellitus related to autonomic neuropathy? Dig
Dis Sci 2003; 48 (6): 1027–34.
26. MacGregor IL, Gueller R, Watts HD et al. The effect of acute
hyperglycemia on gastric emptying in man. Gastroenterol- Address:
ogy 1976; 70 (2): 190–6. Ulf Gustafsson
27. Fraser RJ, Horowitz M, Maddox AF et al. Hyperglycae- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology,
mia slows gastric emptying in type 1 (insulin-dependent) Centre for Gastrointestinal Disease, Ersta Hospital, 116 91, Box
diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 1990; 33 (11): 675–80. 4622 Stockholm
28. Samsom M, Akkermans LM, Jebbink RJ et al. Gastroin- Sweden
testinal motor mechanisms in hyperglycaemia induced e-mail: ulf.gustafsson@erstadiakoni.se

951

You might also like