Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Figure 3.1: The product planning process. These activities address a portfolio of product
development projects, resulting in a product plan and, for each selected project, a mission
statement.
To develop a product planning process and project mission statements, A five-step
process is used:
1. Identify opportunities.
2. Evaluate and prioritize projects.
3. Allocate resources and plan timing.
4. Complete pre-project planning.
5. Reflect on the results and the process.
3.1. Step 1: Identify Opportunities
The planning process begins with the identification of product development opportunities.
Such opportunities may involve any of the four types of projects defined above. This step
can be thought of as the opportunity funnel because it brings together inputs from across
the enterprise. Opportunities may be collected passively, but we also recommend that the
firm explicitly attempt to generate opportunities.
Opportunity Identification, provides a process for generating, recognizing, and evaluating
opportunities. When employed actively, the opportunity funnel collects ideas
continuously, and new product opportunities may arise at any time. As a way of tracking,
sorting, and refining these opportunities, we recommend that each promising opportunity
be described in a short, coherent statement and that this information be collected in a
database. Several Web-based idea management systems are available for gathering and
storing information on opportunities, although a simple list in a spreadsheet may be
sufficient. Following are some examples of opportunity statements similar to those
proposed at Xerox:
• Create a document distribution system in which a networked printing device resides on
each office worker’s desk and automatically delivers mail and other documents.
• Create document delivery software that allows the digital delivery and storage of most
intra-organizational documents via a worker’s personal computer.
This opportunity statement eventually became the Lakes project:
• Develop a new black and white (B&W), digital, networkable, document center platform
for the office market, including scanning, storage, fax, distribution, and printing
capabilities.
word of caution. Technology usually begins to mature before profits top out, so there is often
is a management reluctance to switch to a new technology, with its associated costs and risks,
Fig 3.3: This technology S-curve illustrates that Xerox believed digital copier
technologies were just emerging and would improve product performance in the
coming years. Xerox believed that it could develop a full-featured digital copier in the
near future with performance exceeding that of light-lens copiers.
One technique for coordinating technology development with product planning is the
technology roadmap. A technology roadmap is a way to represent the expected availability and
future use of various technologies relevant to the product being considered ref fig 3.5.
Figure 3.6 Product-process change matrix. The size of the circles indicates the relative
cost of the development
Estimates of required resources in each period can be compared with available resources to
compute an overall capacity utilization ratio (demand/capacity) as well as utilizations by
resource types, as shown in Figure 3-7.Where utilization exceeds 100 percent, there are not
sufficient resources to execute all of the projects in the plan on schedule. In fact, to allow for
contingencies and to enable responsiveness, planned capacity utilization may be below 100
percent.
Project Timing
Determining the timing and sequence of projects, sometimes called pipeline management, must
consider a number of factors, including:
Timing of product introductions: Generally the sooner a product is brought to market the
better; however, launching a product before it is of adequate quality can damage the reputation
of the firm.
Technology readiness: The robustness of the underlying technologies plays a critical role in
the planning process. A proven, robust technology can be integrated into products much more
quickly and reliably.
Figure 3.7: Aggregate resource planning can be achieved using a simple spreadsheet
method based on estimates of resource
So, you can see first phase is product development; second stage is introduction, growth,
maturity and decline. So, clearly evident that during the development of the product you do not
make much profit therefore, you have a negative product, negative graph for the profits.
But once the product is introduced into the market the profits start to increase. And you can see
there is an area in which the profits are maximum this stages when the product has reached the
The BCG diagram can depict the same for introduction, growth, maturity, and decline by
DOGS, Qustion marks, Stars and Cash cows in figure
So. we have seen in detail the product life cycle what are the various stages of the product life
cycle and what are the important decisions characteristics objectives at each stage of the
product life cycle.
Some common terms
C= annual production cost;
D= annual depreciation; S = annual sales revenues; CTCI = total capital investment;
CTDC = total depreciable capital. Cwc- working capital
Numerical Examples on PLC are discussed in the coming pages.
Net present value = present value of income - present value of costs = 131.6 - 82.3
= $ 49.3M over 10 years, or an average of $ 4.93M per year
Use the given data to develop a base-case analysis. The project schedule is shown as follows
with timings of the cash flows.
a. What are the yearly cash flows and their present value (discounted at 12 percent) of this
project? What is the net present value?
b. What is the impact on VidMark if sales estimates are off by 20 percent? (Assume that
VidMark reduces production volume to correspond to the new sales numbers.)
c. What is the impact on VidMark if unit production cost is $85? (Assume sales estimates are
accurate.)
The cash flows are severely affected by the increased unit production cost. Increased future
cash outflow of $1.3 million (130,000 units * $10 increase) causes a decrease in net present
value of $830,000 ($1.333 million − $0.503 million). However, it still appears to be worth
developing the new phone.
References:
1. Engineering Design, George E Dieter, McGraw Hill, 4th edition, 2009
2. Product Design and development, Karl T Ulrich, McGraw Hill,Irwin, 5th edition, 2011
3. Operations and supply chain management, Richard B Chase, 15th edition, McGraw Hill,
2018.