School

Report
Card

SY 2019-2020
 School Profile
1. Enrolment

Enrolment by Gender
FEMALE MALE

558 567
516

475 492 461

S. Y. 2 0 1 7 -2 0 1 8 S. Y. 2 0 1 8 -2 0 1 9 S. Y. 2 0 1 9 -2 0 2 0

Figure 1. There was a slight decrease in the enrolment for the S.Y. 2019-2020 because some
students residing in Sitio Kanluran were relocated in Santiago, General Trias City, Cavite.

2. Health and Nutritional Status

Number of Learners by Health Status

SY 2019-2020
350 Kinder-Grade 3
Grade 4-6
300

250

200

150

100

50

0
MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE

Severely Wasted Wasted Normal Overweight Obese

Table 1. In the primary grades, only 20.46% (117 out of 572) of the learners fall outside the normal
health status and 20.51% (81 out of 395) of Grades 4-6 students fall outside normal health status.
3. Learners Materials
GRADE LEVEL/ SUBJECT QUANTITY NO. OF ENROLLEES NEEDS EXCESS
Kindergarten 137 135 2
Grade 1 166
ENGLISH 132 34
MATHEMATICS 135 31
FILIPINO 135 31
Ap1 135 31
EsP 1 135 31
MTB-MLE 1 133 33
Grade 2 146
English 2 18 128
Math 2 31 115
Filipino 2 26 120
AP 2 26 120
EsP 2 21 125
MTB-MLE 2 25 121
MAPEH 2 23 123
Grade 3 133
English 3 101 32
Science 3 139 6
Math 3 8 125
Filipino 3 129 4
AP 3 0 133
EsP 3 62 71
MTB-MLE 3 111 22
MAPEH 3 126 7
Grade 4 114
English 4 68 46
Science 4 0 114
Math 4 0 114
Filipino 4 70 44
AP 4 58 56
EsP 4 74 40
Music & Arts 4 71 43
PE & Health 4 78 36
EPP 4 61 53
Grade 5 150
English 5 144 6
Science 5 144 6
Math 5 138 12
Filipino 5 137 13
AP 5 143 7
EsP 5 100 50
Music & Arts 5 127 23
PE & Health 5 138 12
EPP 5 96 54
Grade 6 133
English 6 0 133
Science 6 25 108
Math 6 80 53
Filipino 6 0 153
AP 6 0 153
EsP 6 82 51
Music & Arts 6 0 133
PE & Health 6 0 133
EPP 6 0 133

Table 2. There’s an inadequate supplies of Learners Materials in some learning areas and grade
levels most especially in Grade 6.

Physical Count of Inventories (Table 2.1)

 Number
LIBRARY Books 1000
Tables 2
Chairs 20
COMPUTER Computers 12
SCIENCE EQUIPMENT Human Torso Model 2
Flashlight w/ Incandescent Bulb 2
Hand Magnifying Lens 5x 4
Basic 3-Dimensional Models 2
Weighing Scale 5kg. Capacity 1
Simple Anemometer 5
Pair of Bar Magnets 1
Human Torso Model 1
Electricity and magnetism Kit 2
Dry Cell Holder 2
Blue Connecting wire w/ crocodile clips 6
A banana plugs 1
Knife switch 3
Assemblies bulb & socket assembly 1
Spool 100gram Magnetic Copper Wire 1
AWG 20 1
Iron Core Rod (non.corrugated) 2
Long nose pliers 1
Double pan balance 500 gram capacity 1
Flashlight w/ incandescent bulb 1

4. Teachers’ Professional Development

Number of Teachers Attended Training

S.Y. 2018-2019
30

28
25 26

20
Teachers
15

10

8
5 6

0 2
1 1 1
PPST RPMS Primals ECARP Brigada Rondalla NSPC DPDS
Eskwela Cliniquing

Figure 2. For this school year, majority of the trainings attended by our teachers were about PPST
(Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers) and RPMS (Results Based Management System.
 Others; 10,000 5. Funding
Donors; 110,000 Sources
LGU's; 130,000

MOOE; 604,000

Canteen; 350,000

Figure 3. The biggest source of school funding come from the MOOE. Other sources are canteen
fund, LGUs, and donors.

6. School Awards and Recognition (Table 3)

Level (International, Category of
National, Regional, Awardee (Student,
Title of Award Award Giving Body
Division or School Teacher, School
Level) Head, School

3rd place, News Writing-Filipino

(National Qualifier) DepEd CALABARZON Regional Student
Regional Schools Press Conference

Outstanding SPG Gawad Siklab: DepEd Division of

Division School
Maka-Diyos General Trias City

Most Outstanding GAD (Gender &

DepEd Cavite Division School
Development) Implementer

Performance Indicators: Access

7. Number and Rate of Dropouts by Cause

25 Number of drop out by cause

20
2
0
Drop Out Rate
5 2.50%
15 6
2.00%
1.95%
5 1.89%
10 1
0
1.50% 1.55%
12
5 9 10
1.00%
0 0 0
0 0.50%
S.Y. 2016-2017 S.Y. 2017-2018 S.Y. 2018-2019

Armed conflict Family problem Lack of allowance 0.00%

S.Y. 2015-2016 S.Y. 2016-2017 S.Y. 2017-2018
Distance to school sickness

Drop Out Rate

Figure 3 and 3.1. A decrease of .40% was noted in the S.Y. 2016-
2017, and an increase of .34% by S.Y. 2017-2018 in the drop out rate and family problem was the most
common reason.

Performance Indicators: Quality

B. Percentage of learners who completed the School Year (Promotion Rate)

Promotion Rate
S.Y. 2018-2019
100.00% 100.00% Promotion100.00%
100.00% Rate 100.00% 100.00%

Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6

Figure 4. The promotion rate in all levels was 100%.

9. National Achievement Test (NAT) – by Mean Percentage Score (MPS)

 NAT Results by Subject
Grade 6
Grade 6

57.06%

43.31%
39.49%
32.96%
29.69%

Filipino English Mathematics Araling Panlipunan Science

Figure 5. In the recent NAT, low results were obtained by the school especially in Science with the
rating of 29.69%.

10. Literacy Level

Number of Learners by Literacy Level

S.Y. 2018-2019
Frustration Instructional Independent

ENGLISH FILIPINO

126 152
189 209

257 244
241 232

232 219
174 163

P r e-Test P o st Test P r e-Test P o st Test

Figure 6. PHIL-IRI results show an improvement in the students’ literacy. More students have
moved from frustration level to instructional level in both English and Filipino. Reading intervention program
such as CIP (Project GLER) contributed to the improvement of the learners.

Performance Indicators: Governance

11. School-Based Management Level

Qualitative
SMB Level Interpretation: SBM level was improved to maturing or
1.77 Maturing developing level.

12. Child-Friendly School Survey Result

Qualitative
CFSS Points: Interpretation:
30 Outstanding

The school achieved the 7 goals on what a

child- friendly school should be.

13. Stakeholders’ Participation

Stakeholders’
Stakeholders’Contribution,
Attendance SYto 2018-2019
School Figure 6. Stakeholders’ Attendance to School Activities
Activities
Cash/Inkind Figure 6.1. Stakeholders’ Contribution
8000
100%
7000
6923 Number Of Volunteer Hours
95%
6000
6000 5875

5000
90%

4000
85%
3000
70
80%
2000
2000
35
1000 1200 20
75% 17
r
r

s
a
a

ie
ng
ul
ul

bl
ti
ric
ric

em
ee

0 Bri gada C o n t est C l ean -U p D r i v e Ot h er s

ur
ur

Brigada Contest Scouting Closing Others

s
-c
-c

As
Co

tra

Program
Ex

Stakeholders
Stakeholders' Contribution

Figure 4.2 Stakeholders have shown notable participation in the numerous undertakings of the school
14. Learner-Teacher Ratio

Learner-Teacher Ratio
50
S.Y. 2019-2020
45
------------------
40

35
--------
30

25

20
----
15

10

0
K Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6

Standard --
Figure 7. Except for Kinder level, all grade levels have recommended
learner-teacher ratio of 1:40 for Grades 1 & 2, and 1:45 for Grades 3 to 6.

15. Learner-Classroom Ratio

 Learner-Classroom Ratio
50 S.Y. 2019-2020
45
----------------
40
35
--------
30
25
20
----
15
10
5
0
K Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6
Standard --
Figure 8. Except for Kinder level, all grade levels have recommended learner-teacher ratio of 1:40
for Grades 1 & 2, and 1:45 for Grades 3 to 6.

16. Learner-Toilet Ratio

60
50
40
------------
30
20
10
0 All levels have recommended learner-toilet ratio of 1:50.
1 Standard --
17. Learner-Seat Ratio
Learner-Seat Ratio
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
------------
0.4
0.2
0
1
There are currently enough seats for our students.
18. Status of Continuous Improvement Projects Standard --
Project Title ISSA 2017 (Improving Subtraction Skills of academically Project Code BES107957
Challenge Pupil
School Head MARYLOU J. ECHANO
Facilitator LYKA M. TIZON
Team Composition NAME ROLE
Mrs. Myra D. Aro Team Leader
Mrs. Maricel D. Gonzales Process
Observer
Mrs. Mary Alanie P. Lastimoso Scribe
Mr. Jeffrey Monreal Communication
Ms. Jaynes Culaway Documentation
Mr. Arvin Deniega Statistician
KEY CUSTOMER
Academically Challenge Pupils from Grade 1
KEY PROCESS
1. Regular exposure on number sense
2. Daily practice on Drill cards.
3. Introducing the use of manipulatives and techniques
in subtraction
4. Follow-up on pupils whose least familiar with
numbers.
5. Evaluation on the result.
OBJECTIVES
To improve 75% subtraction skills of academically challenge
pupils based on LOA report.

PROJECT SCHEDULE Activity OUTPUT Target date

Assess 1.Get Organized Organization of CI July to August
Team

LOA Result

2.Talk with Survey Form

Costumers
Survey Proper

3.Walk the Process Survey Result

4.Identify Focused Problem

Improvement Statement
Areas
5.Do root cause Why-Why
Analysis Diagram

6.Develop Decision Matrix

Solutions
September to
7.Finalize Timeline December
Analyze Improvement Plan Budget Plan

8.Pilot Pilot the

Solution Project
Act

9.Roll Out Monthly Meeting January 2017 –

Solution with the March 2018
stakeholders

10.Check Progress Monthly Every last week of

Monitoring the month
19. Other Stakeholders’ Accomplishments
Certifed Accurate:

____________________________ ____________________________
Marylou J. Echano Aries P. Pascual
Teacher-In-Charge Teacher Representative

____________________________ ____________________________
Gigi Q. Bergado Marianne P. Lastimoso
GPTA President SPG Representative