De La Salle University- Dasmarinas

COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, ARCHITECTURE AND TECHNOLOGY

ARCHITECTURE DEPARTMENT

COLLABORATIVE FINAL ASSESSMENT

FOR THIRD YEAR

SITE PLANNING
PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE-1 AND,
REVIT/CADD
Second Semester, SY 2020-2021
RATIONALE

This collaborative assessment aims to broaden student’s

appreciation and understanding of various topics in different major
courses. This will develop the critical thinking and comprehensive
cognitive orientation in analyzing how to integrate the science,
logic, and engineering aspect to form a functional space and built
environment. Furthermore, this will increase the learning retention,
profound design confidence and deeper comprehension of
architecturalization process.

COMPONENTS

This assessment shall serve as ‘one project tends all’

requirement for the following courses.

1. Planning
The landscape design must express with holistic approach
showing proper circulation, correct orientation of buildings,
advance tree planting arrangements, and coherent geometry
patterns in relation architectural concept. Appropriate planning
concept and theories must be applied particularly green
architecture.

2. Professional Practice-1

The Architectural design guidelines must be integrated

including but not limited to UAP documents, National Building
Code (NBC), and International Building Code. Fire code is also
important not just in the structure but to the overall site
design.

3. Revit/CADD

The technical drafting level of presentation must show the

strong contrast in line weight value, acceptable proportion of
text sizes (must be consistent) in relation to details and plan.
The view of building perspective must be studied to get the best
“vista” that will maximize the building design potential.
THE TASKS

___________________________________________________________________________

Summative Assessment

The goal of summative assessment is to monitor student learning to provide ongoing feedback
that can be used by instructors to improve their teaching and by students to improve their
learning. More specifically, formative assessments:
 help students identify their strengths and weaknesses and target areas that need work.
 help faculty recognize where students are struggling and address problems
immediately.

FINAL PLATE WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT BEACH RESORT

Special attention should be observed based on the following considerations:

 design process principles

 design creativity/ aesthetics
 functional space planning
 economy and practicality of design and operation
Objectives  green/ sustainable design
 environmental and landscape design
 building technology & building economics
 feasibility of plan and design
 disaster resilient design
 vernacular architecture
 safety and security
Libya, Tripoli is now undergoing a high influx of foreign investors with a 4,600
sqm community retail facility, serves as central commercial focus of premium
residential community and destination development consisting of 5 stars hotel,
61 hotel villas and 368 apartments, on 25 hectares.
The design-build Waterfront project in Tripoli is a premium residential
development providing a unique, quality environment targeted at mid-to-high
income residents, and primarily the expatriate market in the Janzour settlement
located along the coast line of the Mediterranean Sea.
The project is being developed by Al Libya Al Qataria (ALAQ), a joint venture
between Qatari Diyar Real Estate Investment Company and Oyia (a wholly-
owned subsidiary of Libya’s Economic and Social Development Fund).
Introduction Another investment surfaces after the announcement of AECOM regarding the
development contract they signed with Libya government.
AECOM announced today that it has signed an agreement with the Libyan
government’s Housing and Infrastructure Board (HIB) authorizing work valued
at US$209 million over a 25-month period.
This agreement establishes AECOM as the lead program manager for the
Libyan HIB for all urban areas throughout the country. According to the
contract, AECOM will serve as the overall program manager of the HIB capital
budget program — a comprehensive housing and infrastructure development
program for Libya that will create an enhanced environment for its citizens and
visitors — which has a current contracted value of more than US$36
billion. As the program expands and becomes fully reestablished, the HIB
capital budget program is expected to exceed US$100 billion addressing
 critical housing and infrastructure needs throughout the country. AECOM led
the HIB’s housing and infrastructure program from 2007 until it was suspended
in 2011.
After the long hold, the parties now decided to push the phase one of the
flagship development. The project will be the development of a beach resort
fronting the Mediterranean Sea.

During the political reign of the late dictator Muammar Gaddafi, This waterfront
site has been neglected and undeveloped. The site is a dumping ground for
construction demolished materials covering the natural fine white sand of the
bay area.
Muammar Gaddafi became the de facto leader of Libya on 1 September 1969
after leading a group of young Libyan military officers against King Idris I in
a bloodless coup d'état. After the king had fled the country, the Libyan
Revolutionary Command Council (RCC) headed by Gaddafi abolished
the monarchy and the old constitution and established the Libyan Arab Republic,
with the motto "freedom, socialism and unity".
In early 2011, a civil war broke out in the context of the wider "Arab Spring".
Problem Statement The rebel anti-Gaddafi forces formed a committee named the National
Transitional Council on 27 February 2011.
It was meant to act as an interim authority in the rebel-controlled areas. After
killings by government forces in addition to those by the rebel
forces, a multinational coalition led by NATO forces intervened on 21 March
2011 in support of the rebels. The fall of the last remaining cities under pro-
Gaddafi control and Sirte's capture on 20 October 2011, followed by the
subsequent murder of Gaddafi, marked the end of the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya.
Now, the investors are already looking at Libya as a potential for commercial,
housing, and leisure development due to its mile long beach front development
facing the Mediterranean Sea.

The site as stated has been neglected and converted to a construction debris dump
site. Now that AECOM pending contract is reinstated, the chosen site must be
cleared to give way to the new waterfront beach development. The lead master
planner is (SRSS) Smallwood, Reynolds, Stewart, Stewart architectural firm
from Atlanta, Georgia. Your group, as part of SRSS design team is task to do the
masterplan development of this project.

The Site:

Problem Context

There are some small developments but none of them are significant and ready
for demolition. The island at the topmost part is a small fishing port for locals.
The envisioned project is a high-end mixed-use development in partnership with
local council and Hilton Worldwide. The council is requiring the development
of the following.
 The development must house foreign workers.
 The development must reflect the character of a modern Islamic
architecture.
 Traffic circulation must be in line with existing road network, and
 The development must take care of their own security measures.
  Use international building code standard.
 Building ht. must be limited to 6 story or 18mts only.

Hilton worldwide requirements are listed below.

 300 keys five-star hotel
 47 single detached high-end, 3-rooms residential houses with pool each
 20- Duplex townhouse
 3 service apartments for 500 employees
 Souq
 14 maisonettes
 10 apartment buildings
 Community center
 Amenity island
 Retail piazza
 Retail parking area
 Beach piazza
 Beach
 Community Park
 Picnic/ barbecue area
 Children’s Playground
 Park lagoon
 Seaside walk
 Overlook
 Apartment cluster amenity area
 Adult pool
 Kiddie pool
 Putting/chipping green
 Tennis courts
 Mini amphitheater
 Sub-station
 Stp & utility yard
 Buffer area
Note:
No detailed plans will be drawn to all the above aside from what is required
below under technical requirements SDP drawings. However, scaled
geometry configurations must be formulated as per required quantities to
form part to the overall masterplan design.

For further understanding of the location please see attachments

1. CAD file
2. PDF file of site
3. PDF with overlay of actual site
4. JPEG of google earth image.
5. Attachment-1

Data Collection and Data Evaluation

Information gathering and data analysis.

1. Design Criteria
Programming 1.1 Design Objectives (goals in design)
1.2 Design Concept (main idea, the big idea)
2. Site Analysis (legal, environmental, sensory)
3. Sustainability and Landscape Concepts
4. Site Concept
5. Phasing Concept
Specification Full digital drawings on A3 size paper with mixed-media rendering.

Concept Boards
Presentation should show form concept, site development concepts, qualitative
and quantitative propositions, planning considerations, etc.

Site Development Plan (any appropriate scale that will fit A3 size)
Must show the entire development showing road circulation, tree planting design
and conceptual geometric forms of structures as required by the owner.

SDP drawings (any appropriate scale that will fit A3 size)

Technical  1- main entrance welcome statement of the development. Blow up plan
Requirements & perspective only, eye level.
 2- types of any housing variant perspective.
 Beach plaza. Blow up plan & perspective only, eye level.
 Beach area enclaves. Blow up plan & perspective only, eye level.
 Major development road design. Blow up plan & perspective only, eye
level.
 Community Park. Blow up plan & perspective only, eye level.
(Significant area of park only)

Aerial Perspectives (Site Plan)

Minimum of two (2) perspectives
Due July 5-10, whichever falls on scheduled meeting.

Site / Design Concept 20%

Space Allocation Concept 10%
Performance Criteria Synthesis/ Organization of Solution 40%
Presentation Technique / Completeness 20%
Oral Deliberation 10%
TOTAL 100%

Minimum Space
Requirements Per subject coverage (subject prof. can also provide
additional requirements)

1. Site development plan

Planning 2. Landscaping
3. Green architecture
1. Written applied building code analysis.
Prof.Prac-1

1. Plan line value drafting

Revit/CADD 2. Perspectives
COMPONENT MAPPING

COURSES
Requirements
PLANNING PROF.PRAC-1 REVIT/CADD

SITE
DEVELOPMENT x x x
PLAN

ARCHITECTURAL
DRAWINGS x

PERSPECTIVES x x

NARRATIVES x x

SUMMARY OF RUBRICS
WEIGHT
Items Architectural Planning 1 Professional
Revit
Design Practice 1

20% 40%
Site/ Design Concept
Space allocation Concept 10%
Synthesis/Organization of
40%
Solution
written
Presentation Technique/
20% 40% exam
Completeness
Oral Deliberation 10% 20%

TOTAL 100% 100%

 FILES IMAGES/ FILE
1. CADD FILE SENT AS FILE
AUTO CAD
2000
2. PDF FILE OF
SITE

3. JPEG OF SITE INSIDE CADD FILE

WITH
OVERLAY
4. SITE GOOGLE
IMAGE

5. ATTACHMEN
T-1
SUBMISSION PROCESS
1. Upon completion of the requisite presentation, take a high-
resolution picture and save it in your One Drive.
2. Submit the One Drive link to the school book of the
different collaborating subjects. Your respective professor
shall provide a platform where you could submit the link.
3. The deadline shall be on the week before the scheduled final
examination.
4. If there are ‘concerns’ in the process of submission, always
consult or communicate with your respective professors.

REFERENCES

1. Waterfront development | Background, Need & Example - Planning Tank

2. Waterfront development (slideshare.net)
3. 487-494.pdf (niua.org)

Call number/e-provider Materials (textbooks, references, journals, online)

Call #: NA 2708 .Ar25 2014
Call #: SB 473 .B644 2012
Call #: SB 472.45 .D612 2010
Call #: HD 1390 .H79 2010
Call #: SB 475.9.S72.T482 1995
Call #: QH 541.15.L35 .C129 2012
Call #: SB 472 .St28 2013
Call #: HD 205 .Si32 2014
Bielefeld, B. (2014). Architectural presentation. Basel:
Birkhauser.
Booth, N. (2012). Residential landscape architecture : design
process for the private residence. Upper Saddle River, New
Jersey : Pearson.
Dinep, C. (2010). Sustainable site design : criteria, process,
and case studies for integrating site and region in landscape
design. Hoboken, NJ : Wiley.
Walter Martin Hosack.(2010). Land development calculations
: interactive tools and techniques for site planning, analysis,
and design. New York : McGraw-Hill, c2010. 2nd ed.
coeditors, Charles W. Harris ; Nicholas T. Dines.(1995). Time-
saver standards for landscape architecture : design and
construction data. New York : McGraw-Hill, 1995.
Meg Calkins.(2012). The sustainable sites handbook : a
complete guide to the principles, strategies, and practices for
sustainable landscapes. Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, c2012.
Barry W. Starke, John Ormsbee Simonds.(2013). Landscape
architecture : a manual of environmental planning and design.
New York : McGraw-Hill Education, 2013. 5th ed.
Jane Silberstein and Chris Maser. (2014). Land-use planning
for sustainable development. Boca Raton, FL : CRC Press, part
of the Taylor & Francis imprint, [2014]
Enza Lissandrello and John Grin. (2011). Reflexive Planning
as Design and Work: Lessons from the Port of Amsterdam.
(Series: 2011 June, Planning, Theory & Practice, Vol.
12, No. 2 p.223-248)

shio/sy/cillo2021