You are on page 1of 16

Date 2012

Author N a a i j e n , P. and E. Blondel-Couprie

Address Delft University of T e c i i n o l o g y


Stiip Hydromechanics and S t r u c t u r e s L a b o r a t o r y
IMekelweg 2, 2628 CD Delft
TUDelft
Delft University of Technology

Wave induced motion prediction as operational


decision support for offshiore operations

by

P. Naaijen and E. Blondel-Couprie

Report No. 1836-P 2012

Published in Proceedings of the International Conference


Marine Heavy Transport & Lift I I I , RINA, London, UK, I S B N :
978-1-909024-05-2.

Page /of 1/1


INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE

MARINE HEAVY TRANSPORT & L I F T III

24-25 O C T O B E R 2012
RINA HQ, L O N D O N

PAPERS

THE ROYAL INSTITUTION OF NAVAL ARCHITECTS


10 UPPER BELGRAVE STREET, LONDON, SWIX 8BQ Telephone: +44 (0)20 7235 4622
The Royal Institution of
Naval Architects

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE

MARINE HEAVY TRANSPORT & L I F T III

24-25 October 2012


RINA HQ, London

© 2012: The Royal Institution of Naval Architects

The Institution is not, as a body, responsible for the


opinions expressed by the individual authors or
speakers

THE ROYAL INSTITUTION OF N A V A L


ARCHITECTS
10 Upper Belgrave Street
London SWIX 8BQ

Telephone: 020 7235 4622


Fax: 020 7259 5912

ISBN No: 978-1-909024-05-2


A l l the papers in this proceeding have been reviewed
FSC" 0020438
Marine Heavy Transport & Lift III, 24-25 October 2012, London, UK

CONTENTS

The L C A C Carrier: A Heavy-Lift Ship for the Transportation Of A C V S


G. Gougoulidis, Hellenic Navy, Greece

The Turbine Foundation Liner Concept


J.W Brouwer, Dutch Offshore Innovators BV, The Netherlands

Wave Induced Motion Prediction as Operational Decision Support for Offshore


Operations
P. Naaijen, E . Blondel-Couprie, Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands

FeasibUity of Electric Propulsion for Semi-Submersible Heavy Lift Vessels


K . Kokkila, ABB, Finland

Enhancements in Monte Carlo Simulation in Safetrans 5


R. Grin, Maritime Research Institute Netherlands, N L

Non-Linear Hydrostatic Analysis of the Floating Crane Considering the Large Angle
oflnchnation *
K . Y Lee, N. Ku, J.H Cha, K.P Park, Seoul National University, Korea

Effect of Porosity on the Hydrodynamic Behaviour of Oscillating Structures During


Lifting Operations
H. Wadhwa, Intecsea, Australia

Removal and Installation of Modules Onto Truss Spar With DP Heavy Lift Vessel
Z. Ayaz, G. Mclelland, P. Smith, V. McCarthy, Saipem Ltd., U K

Operability of Ballasting and Lifting Operations of Extreme Loads with Integrated


Hydrodynamics (Obelics)
Drs. G. de Vries, Maritime Research histitute Netherlands (MARIN), the Netherlands
Ir. E.J.P.M. Frickel, Marithne Research histitute Netherlands (MARIN), the Netherlands

Technical CapabiUties and Cost Benefits of Dockwise Vanguard


M. J M Seij, Dockwise, The Netherlands

First Heavy Lift Super Fly Jib with Fibre Rope Stays
G. Wender, BigLift Shipping, the Netherlands
W. van Zonneveld, FibreMax, the Netherlands
M. van Leeuwen, Teijin Aramid, the Netherlands
M. te Velthuis, Huisman Equipment, the Netherlands

Developments in Heavy Transport Design Calculations


M. J A van Exsel MSc and J.B. de Jonge MSc, Doclcwise, The Netherlands

Marine Domain Awareness And Safety Of Heavy Lift Operation


S. Yasseri, Safe Sight Technology, U K

© 2012: Tiie Royal Institution of Naval Arcliitects


Marine Heavy Transport & Lift IIL 24-25 October 2012, London, UK

Marine Design Aspects For Large Modules On Heavy Transport Vessels 105
A.P Crowle, CB&I, U K

Heavy Lift Transport Of 231m Lhd From Spain To Australia 113


A. Van Ginkel, Dockwise, Holland
A. Méndez and F . Lago, Navantia, Spain

Authors'Contact Details 229

©2012: Tlie Royallnstitution of Naval Architects


Marine Heavy Transport & Lift III, 24-25 October 2012. London, UK

W A V E INDUCED MOTION P R E D I C T I O N AS O P E R A T I O N A L D E C I S I O N SUPPORT


F O R O F F S H O R E OPERATIONS

P. Naaijen, E . Blondel-Couprie, Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands

SUMiMARY

This paper considers the motivation and approach of a real time predication system of vessel motions. A short term
motion forecast would enable to anticipate on vessel motions in the near future during motion critical offshore
operations such as heavy lifting, helicopter landings etc.
A case study is presented to illustrate the possibility of shifting fi-om a workability analysis based on statistics only to
one involving a deteiministic approach.
The approach to use remote wave obsei-vations by X-band radar for deterministic prediction is explained.

1. MTRODUCTION exceeding certain limits, collision of the cutter head with


the bottom results in large loads that are tiansferred via
It has been common practice for many years to assess the cutter ladder to the connection joint and stud pole.
operability for offshore operations that can be critical Failure of these components resufts in expensive repair
with regard to vessel motions in waves, by considering work and downtime which is why these dredging
statistical properties like significant motion amplitudes or operations are often restricted to very mild wave
most probable maximum values. These are typical conditions.
properties related to the sea surface elevation described
as a stociiastic process. With the development of various It is vii-tually impossible to influence/decrease first order
remote surface elevation sensors like lidar ([1], [5]) and motions, meaning that when they exceed certain
X-band radar [3] a relatively new research field was operational limits it is inevitable to abort or cancel the
initiated considering the surface elevation fi-om a operation, resulting in expensive downtime.
deterministic point of view. It has been shown that in
principle, for relatively small time scales (in the order of In 2012 a research project PROiVIISED Operations
tens of seconds), with this approach it is feasible to (PRediction Of wave induced iVIotions and forces In
accurately predict wave elevation and related properties, Ship, offshore and Dredging Operations) was launched,
like vessel motions, in a deteraiinistic way ([8], [11], [9], initiated by Delft University of Technology. One of the
[7], [2], [13], [12], [6], [4]). The main objective of the main objectives of this project is to predict wave induced
application of deterministic wave and motion prediction vessel motions and related 1^' order quantities resulting
(DWMP) on board offshore vessels is to improve from wave frequent wave forces real time with a forecast
operability and safety. Instead of only indicating horizon in tiie order of 100 s in order to enable
operability by statistical parameters (like most probable anticipation on those predicted motions during motion-
maximum values or significant values), it provides a critical offshore operations.
means to influence the operability: a prediction of wave
elevation and induced vessel motions enables optimal This article aims to report on the backgi-ound and
timing of critical phases within offshore operations. progress within this research project.

The first order forces cause structure motions at First a case study will be presented illustrating the
frequencies in the same range as the wave frequencies. possible use of a deterministic vessel motion prediction,
For many offshore operations involving floating followed by an explanation of the approach using remote
structures mainly the l " order motions in waves are the wave observations by X-band radar to initialize a wave
cause of a limited operability. Oil/LNG tandem off- propagation model.
loading hook-on, helicopter / U A V landing, topside
installation / removal, cutter dredger operation, offshore
wind turbine installation and pipe transfer are a few 2. CASE STUDY
examples.
In order to illustrate this objective, a case study has been
In all these operations, certain risks exist due to wave done in co-operation with one of the participants in order
induced motions: snap loads in offloading hoses just after to assess the possible benefits of a DSS for a typical
connecting, collision o f lifted items, crashing of operation that can be critical with respect to down-time:
helicopters / U A V . transfer of pipes fi-om a supplying barge to a pipe laying
vessel (schematically depicted in Figure 1)
In case of dredging operation in environments that are
exposed to waves, vertical motions of the vessel directly The operability of such lifting operations is detemined
result in vertical motions of the cutter head. When by the expected probability o f collision of the pipe crate

©2012: The Royal Institution of Naval Architects 11


Marine Heavy Transport & Lift III, 24-25 October 2012, London, UK

with the barge once it has been lifted. Having pre- the increase of workability due to less severe statistical
calculated transfer ftinctions of the vertical motions of criteria for typical operations in several different working
the pipe laying vessel relative to the barge and knowing areas.
the incoming waves, the distance between pipe crate and
barge can be simulated during a lift. Considering the pipe transfer, a workability criterion of
98 % probability of successful lift is considered common
practice. This means that when starting a lift at an
arbitraiy moment in time the probability of collision
must be less than 2 %.

For three areas of expected operation (in this speciftc


case Campos Basin Brazil, Block31 Angola and Gorgon
Australia) the increase of workability is considered when
we would assume an allowable collision probability of
10% in combination with a DSS system (instead of the
mentioned 2% without DSS). (This implies that the
assumed probability of the DSS wrongly predicting a
Figure 1, pipe transfer successful lift amounts to 20%.)

This is visualized in Figure 8 where the blue line For every location, historical wave data of the 15 years
represents the vertical position of the crane hook of pipe- between 1992 and 2006 has been used, during which a
laying vessel relative to the supply barge (positive = wave spectrum was recorded every 3 hours resulting in
upward) while the pipe crate is on the barge. (An offset roughly 40000 simulations. Each of the simulations
of -5m has been applied in order to account for slack in resulted in a percentage of successful lifts and a resulting
the hoisting line.) Indicated in green and red are the workability given the criterion of a success rate of
position of the crane hook during a lift. Crossing the minimum 98%.
zero-level con-esponds with the actual take-off of the
pipe crate. Crossing this level downwards after take-off The table below indicates the percentage of increase of
means the pipe crate collides with the barge which occurs workability under the above mentioned assumptions
for the red line. resulting from applying a DSS on a yeariy base (i.e. for
the case the vessel would operate a full year at the
By simulating a sufficient number of lifts, the probability considered location).
of occurrence of a collision can be determined.
Depending on the criterion for this probability the Location Workability Increase
considered sea state can be indicated as workable or not Campos Basin, Brazil 33%
workable. Block 31, Angola 112%
Gorgon, Australia 245%
It is obvious that when being able to predict the veitical Table 1, Workability increase.
relative motions and simulate future pipe lift with an on-
board real time DSS, a crane operator will be able to These numbers should be interpreted carefully: factors
pick a safe moment in time to start the lifting operation. having a favourable effect on the estimated workability
A reliable DSS therefore can justify a less severe increase are the underiying assumptions that for the
workability criterion than is used now. Besides, the situation without DSS the crane driver is not able to
safety of lifting operations is enhanced regardless of the anticipate on the waves by visual observation and that the
applied criterion when using a DSS. vessel operates 365 days / year at the same location.
Besides, the assumed 20% probability of the DSS
As mentioned the prediction of the relative motion of wrongly predicting a successfial lift is a rough estimate.
supply barge and crane hook of the discharging pipe However, the figures clearly indicate the very significant
laying vessel can be used to simulate a pipe-lift at eveiy increase in operability due to only a slight relaxation of
instant in time, real-time. That way possible future the workability criterion.
starting points of the lifting operation can be indicated to
be safe (gi-een) or not safe (red) giving the operator the
oppoi-tunity to choose a safe starting point without 3. APPROACH
having to rely on inaccurate visual obsei-vation. This is
illustrated in Figure 9. The chosen approach to obtain a prediction of the waves
and the resulting motions of a vessel is to use a remote
It is obvious that increased operability has a direct wave measurement and propagate the measured wave
economic impact. I n order to quantify this aspect, a study field towards the location of the vessel. One of the recent
has been carried out into the effect of increased developments into remote wave sensors is the X-band
operability. The objective of this study was to quantify radar, the navigational radar that basically all ships are

12
© 2012: The Royal Institution of Naval Architects
Marifie Heavy Transport & Lift III, 24-25 October 2012, London, UK

equipped with. Being relatively inexpensive and having 3.1 DETERME^IISTIC WAVE PREDICTION
the advantage of large spatial range, it has some FROM RADAR OBSERVATIONS
promising feahires for the intended research objective.
The idea of the application of the X-band radar as a In order to assess the possibilities to initialize a linear
remote sensor is depicted in Figure 10. wave propagation model by using the 3D FFT o f a series
of subsequent radar images, focussing on the effect of the
Waves measured in the indicated observation zone are 3D FFT procedure, simulations have been earned out
used to initialize a wave propagation model which assuming 'prefect' observation data, i.e. assuming an
provides a prediction of the waves and, in combination actual observation of the wave elevation in space and
with the required transfer functions, any wave related time would-be available (without taking into account the
property at the ship location. fact that in reality the observation consists o f the radar
back scatter that in its tum will have to be converted into
3.1 PRINCIPLES OF W A V E SENSE^G B Y X - wave elevation by the mentioned MTF).
BAND RADAR
A 3D Fourier transfonn of a series of 2D snapshots of a
The navigational X-band radar is normally used for wave field is a Fourier transform of the surface elevation
navigation puiposes: avoiding collisions with the 7] applied subsequently over the spatial x, and y domain
suiTounding traffic. Reflections of the radar on the wavy and over time.
sea surface, so-called back scatter, are usually filtered
out. However, this back scatter reveals a lot of valuable
information about the waves. It is important to note From the 3D FFT, the complex amplitudes 4„„;, of the
though that the X-band radar does not provide a direct wave elevation r j , sampled at x spatial points at
measurement of the wave elevation. Wave elevation can
only indirectly be derived from it. time steps, can be derived that relate to the wave
elevation as follows:
A commonly applied analysis technique that is used in
X-band radar remote wave sensing is the three-
dimensional Fourier transform (3D FFT). Applying a 3D
EFT to a series of backscatter images obtained in an m=0 11=0 p=0
observation zone (a part of the entire radar view
indicated, indicated in Figure 11) yields a number of
backscatter components each having a two-dimensional Where:
wave number and frequency. Using the linear dispersion /f„„, is the 2D wave number vector ^/c^, j
relation as a filter and applying modulation transfer
functions (MTF) to translate backscatter data into wave (Dp is the wave frequency
elevation data, yields a frequency domain description o f A consequence of this 3D FFT approach is that equation
the surface elevation which could directly be used for the (1) represents a wave elevation that is periodic in x, y,
initialization of a wave propagation model. and /. See Figure 2. Suppose waves with a main
propagation direction in positive x-direction are
This process is schematically depicted in Figure 11 and considered (see Figure 10) that are observed in the 3D
Figure 12. obsei-vation domain indicated in Figure 2. A n attempt to
use equation (1) to fmd the wave elevation for future
Obtaining the infoiTnation in the radar images in the times and/or down'stream' locations, indicated by the
wavenumher-frequency domain by applying a 3D FFT suiTounding boxes, would result in exact copies of the
basically has three objectives: observation: because of the periodicity introduced by the
1. enable application of the frequency domain 3D FFT procedure, the wave pattern will repeat in space
modulation transfer functions (MTF) that and time.
translate radar backscatter data into wave
elevation data A
2. distinguish real wave phenomena from noise by
using the linear dispersion relation as a filter.
3. remove the ambiguity in the directional sense
resulting from analysing just 1 snapshot of a
wave field
Also transfer functions of wave related properties like
e.g. ship motions could be directly applied to the
y
obtained wave components before applying the inverse obsen'alioD
transformation into time-space domain. •
/

•— — — •t

Figure 2, periodicity of wave elevation representation


from 3D FFT
© 2012: Tlie Royallnstitution of Naval Architects 13
Marine Heavy Transport & Lift III, 24-25 October 2012, London, UK

3.1 SIMULATIONS WITH 'PERFECT' DATA relation. In tenns of equation (1) this means that all
frequencies (O^ are tumed into ty„„^, where equals
A related issue is that the obtained wave components in
equation (1) do not satisfy the dispersion relation. the frequency that conesponds with /c^,

A n example o f the result of a 3D FFT is visualized in This results in a wave representation as given in equation
Figure 3 where each dot represents one wave component (2) where p^s.nd p^refcr to the lower and upper
from a 3D FFT whose colour indicates its magnitude.
frequency following from the chosen filter bandwidth.
(Only components with energy above a threshold value
are shown) The solid line represents the dispersion
relation. As can be seen some dots that are not exactly on
the dispersion line represent wave energy even though 77{x,t)=n\^'X £ 4™/^"'""'-^"""4 (2)
the data on which the 3D FFT was applied is perfectly m=0 11=0 p=p^
linear synthetic wave data.

Figure 3, wave component amplitudes against modulus Figure 4, filtering using dispersion relation
of wave number and frequency
For a more detailed description of the process reference
is made to [7, 2].
It is assumed that the main cause for the occuiTence of
these components is the fact that the 3D FFT is applied This way the periodicity in time will be removed. This is
on a finite spatio-temporal measurement domain. This visualized in Figure 5 where the blue boxes represent the
results in: propagated wave field in time.
1. a grid of /c, - ^ combinations that simply does
not provide a (o^ for eveiy A:„,„ that satisfies the
dispersion relation
2. spectral leakage: (a classical problem ti'eated by
e.g. [18]) Energy of wave components present
in the data whose frequency is not a harmonic of
the record length or whose wave number is not a
harmonic o f the spatial domain length is
assigned to adjacent harmonics.
These 'non-physical' wave components and their
periodicity are obviously a problem when the obtained
components are to be used as the initialization of a
(linear) wave propagation model.

As mentioned, in the process of analysing radar images Figure 5, periodicity of wave elevation after shifting
to obtain a wave obsei-vation, the linear dispersion components onto dispersion relation
relation is used in order to distinguish noise from real
waves: only those components within a certain band
For prediction purposes, only the upper .right box is
width around the dispersion relation are considered as
relevant. It should be noted however that based on the
indicated by the dashed lines in Figure 4.
lower left observation, it is not possible to obtain an
accurate prediction in the entire upper right prediction
In the approach where we want to use the obtained
box. Prediction is only possible in the so-called
remaining components fov propagation, on top o f the
predictable zone. This is explained in more detail in [10]
filtering process, a procedure is applied to the wave
and [2]
components in order to map them onto the dispersion
relation: all wave components within the filter bandwidth
(Figure 4) are 'vertically' shifted onto the dispersion

14 © 2012: Tlie Royal Institution of Naval Arcliitects


Marine Heavy Transport & Lift III, 24-25 October 2012, London. UK

4. R E S U L T S AND CONCLUSIONS The simulations were carried out using temporal and
spatial resolutions for the observations that are realistic
In order to assess the accuracy and vahdity of the for radar capabilities: the spatial step amounted to 7.8 m
proposed approach, a large number of simulations have in both X and y direction and the size of the observation
been conducted. Linear synthetic short crested waves zone was 128 x 128 points.
have been generated. (An average directional spreading
for wind waves has been used.) Part of the generated As can be seen, using the proposed method to map the
wave field was used as an obsei-vation, indicated by the wave components onto the dispersion relation (next to
left square zone indicating 'observation zone' in Figure the band pass filtering around the dispersion relation), an
6. From 32 subsequent snapshots taken with a time accurate prediction can be obtained. The forecast horizon
interval of 1.5 s in this obsei-vation zone the wave field depends on the size of the observation zone and the
was predicted at other locations ('prediction') and future temporal length of the observation, the position of the
times. (The two outer summations over m and n in vessel relative to the observation zone, and the wave
equation (2) can be computed efficiently by means of an condition. This is explained in detail in [2].
inverse 2D FFT from the wave number (/c ) domain into
In order to give an indication of required radar ranges.
the spatial ( X ) domain, resulting in a spatial prediction
Figure 7 shows the optimal distance between the
domain (indicated by the rightmost square zone in Figure
observation zone (i.e. the distance between the right most
6) of equal size as the ohsei-vation domain.) The two
edge of the observation zone and the suggested vessel
snapshots shown in Figure 6 are schematically
location in Figure 6) for the case of the aforementioned
represented by the vertical planes indicated with 'Obs observation zone size and length. The figure shows
zone' and 'Pred.zone' in Figure 5. results for JONSWAP wave spectra whose peak period
Tp is used as the abscissa and which again have an
The colour in Figure 6 indicates the prediction error average directional spreading for wind waves.
according to equation (3), where ^ ^ indicates the
600

ensemble average over 260 realizations and cr^ equals


the variance o f the generated waves, f j is the generated
('bue') wave elevation while T] is the prediction
following from equation (2). The result is shown for 2
moments in time (t= 51 s and t=78 s, being 3 s and 30 s
respectively after the last snapshot of the obsei-vation was
taken).

Figure 7, optimal observation location


The obtained optimal distances between observation
zone and vessel location are all well within the
capabilities of X-band radar wave sensors.

-500 0 500 The principles of wave prediction by using a 3D FFT


X have been shown to be able to give very accurate
prediction results as shown by Figure 6.

Having available the relevant transfer functions as a


function of wave number k , a vessel motion prediction
can easily be obtained.

However, these results are obtained by using perfect


observation data. Future research will focus on research
using more realistic wave observations obtained by
Figure 6, reconsti-uction / prediction accuracy actual X-band radar simulations, involving the effects of
shadowing (parts of the observation zone being blocked

©2012: Tlie Royal Institution of Naval Architects 15


Marine Heavy Transpori & Lift III, 24-25 October 2012, London, UK

for the radar by wave crests, resuhing in gaps in the [7] P. Naaijen and E. Blondel. Reconstruction and
observation) and measurement noise. prediction of short-crested seas based on the
Possible alternatives for the 3D FFT approach w i l l be application of a 3d-fft on synthetic waves, part
investigated. I : Reconstruction. In Proceedings of the 31st
International Conference on Ocean, Offshore
and Arctic Engineering, 2012.
5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS [8] P. Naaijen and R.H.M. Huijsmans. Real time
wave forecasting for real time ship motion
This research on which this paper is based has been predictions. In Proceedings of tlie ASME 2008
carried out within the research project 'PROMISED 27th International Co7iference on Ocean,
Operations' (PRediction Of wave induced Motions and Offshore and Arctic Engineering, 2008.
forces In Ship, offshorE and Dredging Operations), [9] P. Naaijen and R.H.M. Huijsmans. Real time
funded by 'Agency N L ' , a department of the Dutch prediction of second order wave drift forces for
Ministery of Economic Affairs, Agriculture and wave force feed forward in dp. In Proceedings
Imiovation and co-flmded by Delft University of of the ASME 2010 29th International
Technology, University of Twente, Maritime Research Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic
Institue Netherlands, Ocean Waves GMBH, Allseas, Engineering, 2010.
Heerema Marine Contractors and IHC. [10] P. Naaijen, K.Trulsen, and E.Blondel-Couprie.
On the detei-ministic predictability of long
crested waves. ISP, to be published.
6. REFERENCES [11] P. Naaijen, R.R.T. van Dijk, R.H.M. Huijsmans,
and A.A. El-Mouhandiz. Real time estimation
[1] M.R. Belmont, J.M.K. Horwood, R.W.F. Baker, of ship motions in short crested seas. In
and J. Baker. Shallow angle wave profiling Proceedings of the ASME 2009 28th
lidar. Journal of Atmosperic and Oceanic International Conference on Ocean, Offshore
Technology, 24:1150-1156, 2007. and Arctic Engineering, 2009.
[2] E. Blondel and P. Naaijen. Reconstruction and [12] K. Tmlsen. Spatial evolution of water surface
prediction o f short-crested seas based on the waves. In Fith International Symposium WAVES
application o f a 3d-fft on synthetic waves, part 2005, Madrid, July 2005.
1: Prediction. I n Proceedings of the 31st [13] K. Tmlsen and C.T. Stansberg. Spatial
International Conference on Ocean, Offshore evolution of water surface waves: Numerical
and Arctic Engineering, 2012. simulation and experiment o f bichromatic
[3] J. C. Nieto Borge, K. Reichert, and J. Dittmer. waves. In Proceedings of the Eleventh (2001)
Use of nautical radar as a wave monitoring International Offshore and Polar Engineering
insh-ument. Coastal Engineering, 37(3-4):331 - Conference, Stavanger, June 2001.
342, 1999.
[4] D.R. Edgar, J.M.K. Horwood, R. Thurley, and
M.R. Belmont. The effects of parameters on the 7. AUTHORS' BIOGRAPHY
maximum prediction time possible in short term
forecasting of the sea surface shape. Peter Naaijen holds the cun-ent position o f Assistant
International Shipbuilding Progress, 47:287¬ Professor at Delft University of Technology. He is
301,2000. responsible for education in the field of ship and offshore
[5] S. T. Grilli, C. Guerin, and B. Goldstein. hydromechanics and research in the field of detei-ministic
Oceanwave reconstruction algorithms based on wave and vessel motion prediction.
spatio-temporal data acquired by a flash lidar
camera. In Proceedings oflSOPE, 2011. Elise Blondel-Couprie holds the current position of Post
[6] E.L. Morris, H.K. Zienkiewicz, and M.R. Doc at Delft University of Technology following up on
Belmont. Short tenn forecasting of the sea her PhD research at Ecole Cenhale de Nantes on non-
surface shape. International Shipbuilding linear deterministic wave prediction.
Progress, 45:383-^00, 1998.

16
©2012: The Royal Institution of Naval Architects
Marine Heavy Transpori & Lift III, 24-25 October 2012, London, UK

APPENDIX, F I G U R E S
SucMSSful Lift
2 I • t

IV
t

f\J

-fAAJ SO 60
1
80
1
100
1
120
i 1 1
1S0 130 200
«mé [s]

Figure 8, Simulation of pipe lift

\ \ L

Indication of safe and unsafe


future sterling points

Time
Now

Figure 9, possible Decision Support System forecast information

Figure 10, Remote wave sensing by radar.

©2012: Tlie Royal Institution of Naval Architects


Marine Heavy Transport & Lift III, 24-25 October 2012 London, UK

I'

0 1 2 xfkm]

Figure I I , radar observation zone

3D FFT
on reflection intensity

inverse 3D FFT

apply MTF's: filter using linear


translate radar reflection dispersion relation: match
into surface elevation kand a

Figure 12, schematic process transfonnation back scatter data into wave elevation

18
©2012: T/te Royal Institution of Naval Arcliitects

You might also like