Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
This content downloaded from 47.31.111.254 on Sat, 29 Feb 2020 06:01:58 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
STUDIES IN THE HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY
OF RELIGION
This content downloaded from 47.31.111.254 on Sat, 29 Feb 2020 06:01:58 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
378 THE JEWISH QUARTERLY REVIEW
This content downloaded from 47.31.111.254 on Sat, 29 Feb 2020 06:01:58 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
HISTORY-PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION-FINKELSTEIN 379
This content downloaded from 47.31.111.254 on Sat, 29 Feb 2020 06:01:58 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
380 THE JEWISH QUARTERLY REVIEW
Shailer Mathews, in his Growth of the Idea of God,2 follows the develop-
ment of the idea of God from the earliest beginnings of religion in primi-
tive man's blind search for Divine help and guidance to early, mediaeval
and modern Christianity, and even attempts to prognosticate the
future of the religion. Dean Mathews's main thesis is that the con-
ception of God in any particular civilization will depend on its forms
of social, political and other institutional life. Among primitive peoples
with their tribal organization God is naturally conceived as the Chief-
tain; in the early national state, as the King; in the Roman Empire
as the single Ruler. The origin of Jewish monotheism is sought by Dean
Mathews in the concentration of worship and government in Jerusalem;
the political unity of Israel being, in his opinion, the foundation on
which the prophets reared their idea of the Divine unity. Turning to
fields where his contributions are more direct, original and certain, the
author gives us a clear and careful study of the religious trends in later
Hellenic days and in the Roman Empire. He makes the necessary dis-
tinction between popular and philosophic religion, and shows how among
the Greek philosophers, there was a distinct tendency toward mon-
otheism. But the monotheism of the classical philosophers arose not
from their religious insight, but from their search for unity in the world.
"God was thus essentially a metaphysical term, the ultimate of the
philosopher. Others had their gods" (p. 100). In Christianity the two
approaches were united, and so we have in Christian theology the
monotheism of religion bound together, in philosophical circles, with a
metaphysical conception of God, essentially foreign to the Hebraism
from which Christianity was born.
Doctor Mathews's study of mediaeval Christianity may well serve
as an introduction to the religious philosophy of the scholastics. Like
Professor Pringle-Pattison, Dean Mathews is clearly endeavoring to
overcome the tendency of modern students to ignore the achievements
of past thinkers, who had to contemplate God without the assistance
of trains, steamships, aeroplanes, radios and the other contraptions
which are tending to make our own generation so arrogant and self-
sufficient. Jewish readers will note with particular interest the author's
reference to Maimonides as "one of the greatest of the mediaeval
thinkers who gave not only to Judaism but indirectly to Christianity a
philosophical basis for the God revealed in the Bible" (p. 155).
This content downloaded from 47.31.111.254 on Sat, 29 Feb 2020 06:01:58 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
HISTORY-PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION-FINKELSTEIN 381
For many who are not historically minded, the most important
chapter in the volume will doubtless prove the last in which Dean
Mathews speaks of a "Contemporary God." Here Mathews with his
unusual lucidity and erudition tries, as did the philosophers of the mid-
dle ages, to disentangle the conception of God from the anthropo-
morphisms with which it is so frequently associated. He arrives at the
definition: "God is our conception, born of social experience, of the
personality-evolving and personally responsive elements of our cosmic
environment with which we are organically related" (p. 226). It is
difficult in a brief review to do justice to the argument by which the
author justifies the definition, or to the explanation he gives of it. He
finds room in it for both prayer to God and meditation about Him.
Note that he speaks of our "cosmic environment" rather than of the
Universe, for he declines to align himself either with panpsychism or
pantheism. But neither does he deal with the problem of the transcend-
ency of God. This avoidance of a crucial question weakens the argument
and the definition to which it leads. The "personality evolving and
personally responsive elements of our cosmic environment" seem to
many of us a reflection of the profoundest Being, and it is to that Being,
rather than to the reflection, that we offer homage, praise, prayer and
worship.
More limited in its scope than either of the preceding volumes, the
Hebrew Religion3 by Oesterley and Robinson is yet an important con-
tribution to the history of religion. A number of excellent volumes on
the development of biblical theology have appeared in recent years,
since the publication of Kautzsch's Biblische Theologie des Alten Testa-
ments on which most of them draw, and the plan of which they generally
follow. The present authors have broken with the tradition established
by this book in two respects. They devote much more space to the
Semitic and pre-Mosaic customs and beliefs and they deal much more
fully with the Judaism of the second commonwealth. The treatment
of prophetic theology is thus necessarily briefer, but this may be jus-
tifiable since other volumes are available for a discussion of that par-
ticular aspect of the history of Jewish religion.
The authors have made a serious attempt to be just to later Judaism,
and to see Pharisaism in the light of its own conceptions and values.
With the material at hand they have done what they could to follow
This content downloaded from 47.31.111.254 on Sat, 29 Feb 2020 06:01:58 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
382 THE JEWISH QUARTERLY REVIEW
This content downloaded from 47.31.111.254 on Sat, 29 Feb 2020 06:01:58 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
HISTORY OF JEWISH LITURGY-FINKELSTEIN 383
RABBIS, teachers and students have long felt the need for a book in
English on the Jewish liturgy. Elbogen's Der Jiidische Gottesdienst in
seiner geschichtlichen Entwicklung, which is the most authoritative and
excellent work on the subject, being in German is not accessible to the
many students unacquainted with that language. The attempt to
translate the work into Hebrew was not carried out; and so besides
the small, though valuable, Companion to the Daily Prayer Book by
Israel Abrahams (London 1922), many American and English students
had no authoritative work about the origin and development of the
Jewish service.
Prof. A. Z. Idelsohn has now provided this in his work Jewish Liturgy
and Its Development. Drawing on all available sources, Dr. Idelsohn
presents in lucid form the information necessary for an understanding
of the chief points in this history. Here and there we find lapses, even
This content downloaded from 47.31.111.254 on Sat, 29 Feb 2020 06:01:58 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms