Project Information Summary

Project title: Strengthening sustainability in commodity and food systems, land restoration and land
use governance through integrated landscape management for multiple benefits in Indonesia

Abbreviation: Food Systems, Land Use and Restoration (FOLUR) Impact Programme.

Project Goal:
Ensuring sustainable value chains of palm oil, coffee, cocoa and rice via application of a
comprehensive land use approach integrating biodiversity conservation, restoration and production at
scale.

Project sites: Covering 5 districts in 5 provinces:

1
Project Problem Tree

2
Project Theory of Change

3
Project Strategy and Approach
• Integrated jurisdictional/landscape management approach.
• Combining management and governance improvements.
• Building strengthened, resilient and food secure livelihoods.
• Leverage of change through value chains and business relations.
• Inclusiveness and participation.
• Participatory action learning.
• Systems leadership (comprised of three interconnected elements: the individual, community,
system).

Project Focus:
In line with the objectives of the FOLUR Impact Programme, the components and outcomes of the
project will focus on:
1. Promoting sustainable food systems to meet growing global demand.
2. Promoting deforestation-free agricultural commodity supply chains to slow loss of tropical forests.
3. Promoting restoration of degraded landscapes for sustainable production and to maintain
ecosystem services.

4
Project Goal, Components, Outcomes, and Outputs
Project Goal: Ensuring sustainable value chains of palm oil, coffee, cocoa and rice via
application of a comprehensive land use approach integrating biodiversity
conservation, restoration and production at scale.
Component 1: Enabling environment for sustainable value chains and integrated landscape
management.
Outcome 1 Strengthened policy and planning framework for integrated landscape
management, commodity and/or crop value chains and landscape governance at
national and sub-national levels, informed by multi-stakeholder engagement.
• Output 1.1. Policy analyses and proposals Key deliverables/results:
developed for national and/or sub- • At least 5 analyses for the
national level policies, regulations, or development/strengthening of national and/or
government programs to improve sub-national policies or regulations, including:
commodity/crop value chain and to regulating harmful subsidies for the environment
ensure the implementation of and biodiversity.
conservation agriculture and/or
• At least 5 draft policies or regulations finalized
protection of essential ecosystems.
and submitted to the Legal Bureau for
legalization.
• Advocacy for the legalization of the policies or
regulations.
• Output 1.2. Strengthened multi-stakeholder Key deliverables/results:
dialogue mechanisms on landscape • Systems leadership and collaborative leadership
management and sustainable capacity co-created with national level
commodity/crop production. champions for rollout in project jurisdictions with
local champions (including those from the house
of representatives such as the budgetary
chamber).
• Expert facilitation capacities created to deliver a
high-level learning forum for sustainable
commodities generating cross-initiative
knowledge, efficiencies and relationships
• Innovation from learning forum and shifts in
relationships create national level system
changes for sustainable production.
• Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil Forum (FoKSBI)
is institutionalized with long-term financing
mechanisms in place at national, provincial and
district level and publicly reporting progress on
the National Action plan for Sustainable Palm Oil.
• Output 1.3. Sustainable action plans on cocoa, Key deliverables/results:
coffee and rice that also include • Commodity sustainable action plans are aligned
strategies for strengthening farmer with ILM, TSA and spatial plans, as part of a
support systems formulated, holistic collaborative approach with similar
adopted, and initial implementation stakeholders.
monitored.
• Stakeholders are accountable for collective
actions and reports on commodity sustainable
action plans are published and proactively

5

• Output 1.4. Decision support tools for informing
policy formulation and planning
developed and/or strengthened
Outcome 2 Landscape management approach mainstreamed in the target provinces through
adoption of jurisdictional integrated landscape management plans
• Output 2.1. Provincial and district level situation
analysis and dialogue mechanisms
established and/or strengthened for
integrated landscape management
involving government, private sector,
CSOs and local communities.
• Output 2.2. Maps and inventories of HCV/HCS
areas and other priority or essential
ecosystems generated for five target
jurisdictions, with categories for
protection and sustainable
production defined with
accompanying management
guidelines.
• Output 2.3. Jurisdictional integrated landscape
management plans delineating
production, protection and
restoration activities formulated,
legalized, and monitored
disseminated
• Provincial and district level government budgets
include actions from the action plans.
• Private sector enterprises and/or coalitions align
relevant components of their sustainability
initiatives with the sustainable action plans on
cocoa, coffee, and rice.
• Action plans fully incorporate gender and
customary people’s issues.
• Joint diagnosis, investigation and agreement on
systemic solutions for strengthening existing
farmer support systems.
• Collective vision, strategies and implementation
plans sub-national farmer support systems.
Key deliverables/results:
• A policy assessment tool developed and tested to
enable assessment on policy integration and
harmonization among government jurisdictions
and across government sectors.
• Scorecard system and annual monitoring
reporting mechanism developed to assess
integration.
Key deliverables/results:
• Robust attendance from a cross-cutting selection
of stakeholders represented by empowered
and/or legitimate individuals.
• Dialogue is characterized by increased trust, and
compassion for the specific perspectives and
needs of others.
• Narratives used in meetings by stakeholders are
aligned and reflect shared understanding and
objectives.
Key deliverables/results:
• Five sets of maps (1 : 50,000) produced,
identifying critical land areas (i.e. KBA, HCV/HCS
and other priority conservation areas or essential
ecosystems) while considering the existing
environmental laws and regulations in place.
Key deliverables/results:
• Land use/sustainable development scenarios (for
50-year period of time) formulated for the five
target jurisdictions/provinces based on the
identified priorities.
• Targeted Scenario Analysis (TSA) conducted for
6

• Output 2.4. Environmental carrying capacity for
key commodities and crop assessed
and trade-offs analyzed for five target
districts
• Output 2.5. Environmental sustainability and
integrated landscape management
considerations (e.g. protection of
ecosystem service provision areas,
biological corridors, fragile soils)
incorporated into planning
instruments of target districts
Component 2: Promotion of sustainable crop production practices and responsible value
chains
Outcome 3 Sustainable and responsible investment and finance through public-private-
community partnerships leveraged for implementation of sustainable value chains
• Output 3.1. Mechanisms available to farmers
strengthened or newly established to
provide finance/credit for sustainable
production incorporating eligibility
criteria based on sustainability
• Output 3.2. Facilitating improved public-private-
community collaboration and
partnerships to strengthen
sustainable production and
sustainable value chains.
each land use/sustainable development scenario,
• One land use scenario agreed by stakeholders for
sustainable development in the target
jurisdictions,
• Based on the agreed land use/sustainable
development scenario, a jurisdictional
sustainable landscape management plan for each
target jurisdiction developed, adopted, and
disseminated.
Key deliverables/results:
• Maps of biophysical and climate suitability of key
commodities and crops including but not limited
to oil palm, coffee, cocoa, and rice, developed for
the FOLUR target districts.
• Estimated economic costs and benefits (trade-
offs) of: (i) land use activities based on the
biophysical suitability and climate maps and
zoning derived from the jurisdictional ILM plans;
and (ii) maintaining one cycle of commodity
plantation (including maintaining biotic
pollinators and waste handling).
• Zoning frameworks/master plans.
Key deliverables/results:
• Detailed spatial zoning plans/maps incorporating
the jurisdictional ILM plans and commodity/crop
suitability.
• Advocacy to obtain governments’ endorsement
on the detail spatial zoning plans/maps.
Key deliverables/results:
• Research and consultations conducted to
determine an appropriate smallholder financial
mechanism;
• One mechanism established and operationalized
to provide finance/credit to smallholder farmers
for: capacity building, agri-inputs, land
certification, sustainability certifications (ISPO,
RSPO, ISCC, Fair Trade, RA, etc.).
Key deliverables/results:
• Process put in place for brokering and facilitation
of collaboration and partnerships that address
shared sectoral issues and challenges (e.g.
traceability, farmer support, environmental
monitoring, conservation finance) through cross-
7
 sectoral and systemic solutions via:
✓ Greater cross-sector collaboration between
upstream producers.
✓ Increased collaboration between
downstream buyers and upstream
producers.
✓ Increased collaboration with governments
and sustainable development funders in key
downstream demand markets.
• Increased investment and support from
downstream buyers and from demand market
governments and sustainable development
funders into sustainable production initiatives in
the project jurisdictions, as well as more broadly
at the province and national levels.
• Innovating new PPP and PPCP business models
and disseminating the learning..
• Output 3.3. Open innovation challenge Key deliverables/outputs:
introduced to identify solutions that • An Open Innovation Challenge launched to
can be scaled to address strategic address food systems, land use and restoration
issues. challenges.
• Business plan for sustaining the process after GEF
funding ceases.
Outcome 4 Smallholder farmers receiving increased value for their products through integrated
value-chain traceability systems and improved grading for selected commodities
and jurisdictions.
• Output 4.1. Integrated system on farmer support Key deliverables/outputs:
and value chain traceability • .
developed and/or strengthened for
palm oil, cocoa, and coffee in three
different jurisdictions.
• Output 4.2. Guidance on grading for value Key deliverables/outputs:
additions developed for oil palm, • Guidance on grading for value additions
cocoa, coffee and rice developed for oil palm, cocoa, coffee and rice.
• Training and socialization of the grading
guidance.
• Output 4.3. Training program on integrated Key deliverables/outputs:
system for farmer support and value- • .
chain traceability delivered for
governments, private sector
companies and farmer groups
Outcome 5 Smallholder farmers and support services strengthened in target districts to implement
sustainable and resilient production and farming systems
• Output 5.1. District-level plans of farmer support Key deliverables/outputs:
interventions, reflecting stakeholder • Maps on priority locations in the district for
priorities, zoning, and land smallholder intervention, based on the land use
classification. zoning maps generated under Output 3.2.
Ideally, priority locations should be within the
areas identified as “go areas” (i.e. where

8

• Output 5.2. Agricultural extension service systems
strengthened in target districts to
support smallholder farmers on the
promotion of and increased uptake of
sustainable production practices and
farming systems
• Output 5.3. Support to smallholder capacity
development and sustainability
certification delivered for selected
smallholder producers within target
districts
• Output 5.4. Support delivered to smallholder
farmers for land tenure/legalization,
enabling achievement of sustainable
and resilient production and farming
systems
cultivation is allowed) that are proximate to the
“no-go” areas (protected areas or other essential
ecosystems) but must still be within the partner
company’s supply chain.
• Participatory problem and solution analyses at
district and community levels, to identify
appropriate management options and
interventions promoting sustainability at farm
and landscape levels, to be included in extension
programmes.
• Smallholder households in the priority locations
are determined for intensification and land
legalization.
Key deliverables/outputs:
• Potential trainers (extension officers) identified
to receive the Training of Trainer (ToT) program
• ToT for the selected trainers with the potential to
engage some of them in sustainable
intensification activities for the target
smallholders.
Key deliverables/outputs:
• Baseline and smallholder-needs assessments are
conducted on the selected smallholder
households to measure their baseline conditions
and training needs. The baseline will need to
include among others: name, plantation area and
age, land tenure documentation, income and
source, current agricultural practices related to
plantation maintenance, planting material,
access to market, productivity and farmer
organization/group, gender roles.
• Establishment and/or strengthening of the
farmer groups/union/cooperative of the
selected, assessed, and mapped smallholders.
This will include the assignment of unique
identification number/card for traceability.
• Smallholder households trained on sustainable
intensification, organization, income
diversification and environmental protection.
Project support to the development of capacities
among farmers to apply sustainable
management options will participatory and
demand-led, in order to ensure relevance and
the durability of uptake.
Key deliverables/outputs:
• In collaboration with the partner companies and
district governments, support provided for
farmers and farmer organizations for legality and
sustainability certification readiness.
9
Component 3: Conservation and restoration-rehabilitation of natural habitats.
Outcome 6 Models of management, incentives and governance catalysing biodiversity
conservation, and land/habitat restoration of degraded priority ecosystems enabled
in target districts
• Output 6.1. Detailed plans for conservation, Key deliverables/outputs:
restoration and sustainable • Five detail management and costed action plans
management of priority degraded developed and adopted in FOLUR districts,
ecosystems formulated and adopted outlining protection, restoration-rehabilitation,
in target districts and where necessary sustainable use, as well as
actions to maintain/improve genetic biodiversity
in and outside production landscapes.
• Liaison with the local governments and other
relevant stakeholders to ensure the adoption and
implementation of the management plans.
• Output 6.2. Management models (e.g., social Key deliverables/outputs:
forestry) for critical ecosystems • Referring to the priority areas (Output 6.1) pilot
implemented in target districts, taking sites for community-based ecosystem
advantage of available incentive management (protection and restoration)
mechanisms. identified and agreed.
• Appropriate incentive mechanism(s) established
for pilot sites, including resource mobilization.
• Output 6.3. Strengthened collaborative Key deliverables/outputs:
governance mechanisms and • .
capacities supporting effective
conservation and restoration
Component 4: Knowledge management, coordination, collaboration and monitoring and
evaluation
Outcome 7 Integrated knowledge management, coordination, and collaboration to enhance
knowledge of factors to foster lessons learns for replication in other areas
• Output 7.1. Project implementation controlled Key deliverables/outputs:
through proactive steering committee • .
functions and inclusive monitoring
and evaluation.
• Output 7.2. Inclusive participation of local Key deliverables/outputs:
communities, including women and • .
traditional peoples, facilitated
through effective implementation of
environmental and social
management plan.
• Output 7.3. Adaptive management methodology Key deliverables/outputs:
developed to monitor, evaluate, and
• An Impact Evaluation Framework developed for
respond to causal impacts and
FOLUR Project to monitor and evaluate causal
systemic change
impacts and systemic change.
• Monitoring and evaluation of project
implementation, including additional report on
causal impacts and systemic change brought by
the project at the national and sub-national
levels.

10
• Output 7.4. Knowledge management and
outreach system developed for
supporting scaling out across
jurisdictions/provinces and nationally,
regionally, and globally
• Output 7.5. Participation in Global FOLUR CoP and
other relevant platforms on
knowledge and lessons exchanges.
Key deliverables/outputs:
• Data-collection drive for FOLUR Indonesia in
operationalized and maintained
• Lessons-learned captured across FOLUR
interventions and landscapes
• Knowledge products for public dissemination
including through FOLUR Indonesia annual
workshops.
Key deliverables/outputs:
• Participation of relevant FOLUR Indonesia’s
representatives in the annual Regional and
Global FOLUR platforms
• Participation of relevant FOLUR Indonesia’s
representatives in Green Commodity Programme
(GCP)’s Community of Practice
• Participation of relevant FOLUR Indonesia’s
representatives in commodity-based regional-
level knowledge exchanges, especially with
Malaysia and Papua New Guinea
• Contribution to the development of the Global
FOLUR annual progress reports and quarterly
M&E reports
• Contribution to the development of the Global
FOLUR knowledge, technical and policy products.
11
The Project Results Framework
This project will contribute to the following Sustainable Development Goal (s): SDG 1 (No Poverty), SDG 2 (Zero Hunger), SDG 5 (Gender Equality), SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Productio
13 (Climate Action), SDG 15 (Life on Land), SDG 17 (Partnerships for Goals)
This project will contribute to the following country outcome: UNSDCF Indonesia 2021-2015, Outcome 3/ UNDP OUTCOME 3: Institutions, communities and people actively apply and implement lo
development, sustainable natural resources management, and disaster resilience approaches that are all gender sensitive; Output 3.2: Strengthened and expanded protection, governance and mana
of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, habitats, and species (SP Output1.4.1); Output 3.4: Conservation and resilience strategies with local priorities (income and food security) contribute to global
environment benefits (SP output2.4.1); UNDP Strategic Plan 2018-2021,Signature Solution 4: Promote nature-based solutions for a sustainable planet; FAO country outcome ...
Objective and Outcome Indicators Baseline Mid-term Target End of Project Target
Project Objective: Mandatory Indicator 1, GEF-7 Core Indicator 11: # direct Not applicable Estimated 103,000 103,000 (of whom 53,800 are fem
Ensuring sustainable value project beneficiaries disaggregated by gender as a co- beneficiaries (of whom
chains of palm oil, coffee, cocoa, benefit of GEF investment (individual people) 53,800 are female)
and rice via application of a SDG 1.4; SDG 1.b; SDG 5.a; confirmed by midterm
comprehensive land use Mandatory Indicator 2, GEF-7 Core Indicator 3: Area of land Not applicable In full consultation with 20,000 ha of degraded production
approach integrating restored (hectares); Sub-Indicator 3.2: Area of forest and relevant stakeholders areas restored-rehabilitated
biodiversity conservation, forest land restored 20,000 ha of degraded
restoration, and production at SDG 15.3; production forest areas (i.e.
scale permanent, limited, and
convertible production
forest) delineated and
designated for restoration -
rehabilitation identified in
KEE schemes (Essential
Ecosystem Area), social
forestry plans, public-
private-community MOUs,
or other means.
Mandatory Indicator 3, GEF-7 Core Indicator 4: Area of Not applicable Jurisdictional ILM plans, 1.474 million ha, including 1.474 m
landscapes under improved practices (excluding protected designating 1.474 million ha under improved management (4.1
areas); Sub-Indicator 4.1: Area of landscapes under for improved management, to 0.113 million ha of HCV forest l
improved management to benefit biodiversity (qualitative are finalised, and endorsed avoided (4.4).
assessment, non-certified); and Sub-Indicator 4.4: Area of by provinces.
High Conservation Value forest loss avoided (hectares)
SDG 2.4; SDG 12.2; SDG 15.2; SDG 15.9; SDG 15.b;
Mandatory Indicator 4, GEF-7 Core Indicator 6: Greenhouse Not applicable Estimation of 94.44 million 94.44 million metric tons (direct)
Gas Emissions Mitigated (million metric tons of CO2e); Sub- tons CO2e (direct) 188.88 tons (indirect) of CO2e mit
Indicator 6.1: Carbon sequestered, or emissions avoided in confirmed through ILM plans contributed to the AFOLU sector
the sector of Agriculture, Forestry, and Other Land Use
SDG 13.2; SDG 13.3;
Component 1: Enabling environment for sustainable value chains and integrated landscape management

12
Outcome 1: Strengthened policy
and planning frameworks for
integrated landscape
management, commodity
and/or crop value chains and
landscape governance at
national and sub-national levels,
informed by multi-stakeholder
engagement
Outputs to achieve Outcome 1
Outcome 2:
Integrated landscape
management approach
mainstreamed in the target
provinces and districts through
adoption of jurisdictional
integrated landscape
management plans
Outputs to achieve Outcome 2
Component 2: Promotion of sustainable crop production practices and responsible value chains
Outcome 3: Sustainable and
responsible investment and
finance through public-private-
community partnerships
Indicator 5: Improved consistency and relevance of policies The policy assessment tool Policy assessment tool At least 30% of policies assessed i
in the project jurisdictions, as measured by the policy and supporting scorecard completed, and application project jurisdictions lead to highe
assessment scorecard will be developed under initiated in project using the policy assessment score
Output 1.4. jurisdictions.
Indicator 6: Improved multi-stakeholder collaboration in Baseline scorecard Multi-stakeholder Increase of at least one level on th
integrated landscape management and value chains, as assessments made at project collaborative spaces of systemic change at national, pr
indicated by progress made along the multi-stakeholder inception through focus functioning in project (5) and district (5) levels
collaboration ladder of systemic change scorecard group discussion approach: jurisdictions.
national, provincial (5) and
district (5) levels
Output 1.1. Policy analyses and proposals developed for national and/or sub-national level policies, regulations, or government programs to improve commodity/
value chain and to ensure the implementation of conservation agriculture and/or protection of essential ecosystems
Output 1.2. Strengthened multi-stakeholder dialogue mechanisms on landscape management and sustainable commodity/crop production
Output 1.3. Sustainable action plans on cocoa, coffee and rice that also include strategies for strengthening farmer support systems formulated, adopted, and init
implementation monitored
Output 1.4. Decision support tools for informing policy formulation and planning developed and/or strengthened
Indicator 7: Mainstreamed landscape management Not applicable Jurisdictional ILM plans 100,000 ha
approach, as indicated by area of priority areas under mainstreamed into
improved management (1.474 million ha) that is set aside provincial and/or district
for conservation land planning and/or
conservation decrees,
regulations, or programs
Indicator 8: Strengthened landscape management at the Not applicable ILM considerations 5
district level, as indicated by number of regulatory decisions mainstreamed into 5 district
that respond to the provisions of the land use plans spatial plans
Output 2.1. Provincial and district level situation analysis and dialogue mechanisms established and/or strengthened for integrated landscape management involv
government, private sector, CSOs and local communities
Output 2.2. Maps and inventories of HCV/HCS areas and other priority or essential ecosystems generated for five target jurisdictions, with categories for protectio
sustainable production defined with accompanying management guidelines
Output 2.3. Jurisdictional provincial-level integrated landscape management plans delineating production, protection and restoration priorities formulated, legalis
monitored
Output 2.4. Environmental carrying capacity for key commodities and crop assessed and trade-offs analysed for five target districts
Output 2.5. Environmental sustainability and integrated landscape management considerations (e.g. protection of ecosystem service provision areas, biological co
fragile soils) incorporated into planning instruments of target districts
Indicator 9: Strengthened implementation of sustainable Not applicable USD 1 million available in USD 1 million for 500 smallholder
value chains, as indicated by the volume of smallholder financing households (at least 10% for each
investments/finance leveraged (USD) for operationalisation mechanisms the project jurisdictions, including
of smallholder financing mechanisms by number, type and female-led households
13
leveraged for implementation of
sustainable value chains
Outputs to achieve Outcome 3
Outcome 4: Smallholder
farmers receiving increased
value for their products through
integrated value-chain
traceability systems and
improved grading for selected
commodities and jurisdictions
Outputs to achieve Outcome 4
Outcome 5: Smallholder
farmers and support services
strengthened in target districts
to implement sustainable and
resilient production and farming
systems
gender of beneficiaries
Indicator 10: Expanded private sector involvement, as Information on existing PPPs PPPs and/or PPCPs drafted, 18,000 ha, 14,000 farmer househo
indicated by the area (ha) covered by and number of farmers and PPCPs … covering 18,000 ha and (8,000 palm oil households (100%
involved in PPPs and/or PPCPs to strengthen sustainable 14,000 farmers ha; 3,000 coffee households (50%
production and value chains, by type and objective ha; 1,000 cocoa (50%), 1,000 ha; 1
(25%), 2,000 ha)
Output 3.1. Mechanisms available to farmers to provide finance/credit for sustainable production incorporating eligibility criteria based on sustainability
Output 3.2. Facilitating improved public-private-community collaboration and partnerships to strengthen sustainable production and value chains
Output 3.3. Open innovation challenge introduced to identify solutions that can be scaled to address strategic issues
Indicator 11: Enhanced traceability of sustainability Information on existing Testing of traceability 18,000 ha (12,000 ha oil palm; 3,0
produced palm oil, cocoa, coffee, and rice, as measured by traceability systems … systems underway for coffee; 1,000 ha cocoa; 2,000 ha r
the planted area (ha) under verified traceability systems 18,000 ha planted area
(12,000 ha oil palm; 3,000 ha
coffee; 1,000 ha cocoa;
2,000 ha rice)
Indicator 12: Improved capacities of farmers to add value Grading systems are not in Training of grading guidance During last full year of project
to palm oil, cocoa, coffee and rice, as measured by the place initiated with farmers implementation: (a) 10% palm oil,
percentage of product volume by smallholder farmers in representing the following coffee, (c) 10% cocoa, and (d) 10%
project districts, by crop, subject to effective grading by percentage of smallholder
quality production in project district
jurisdictions: (a) 10% palm
oil, (b) 10% coffee, (c) 10%
cocoa, and (d) 10% rice
Output 4.1. Integrated system on farmer support and value chain traceability developed and/or strengthened for palm oil, cocoa and coffee in three different juri
Output 4.2. Guidance on grading for value additions developed for oil palm, cocoa, coffee and rice
Output 4.3. Training program on integrated system for farmer support and value-chain traceability delivered for governments, private sector companies and farm
Indicator 13: Increased capacities for farmer support for Baseline to be determined at Capacity building plans for By the last full year of project
sustainable and resilient production and farming systems, project inception. technical support services implementation: (a) 10% increase
as indicated by the percentage increase in the numbers of developed to achieve the extension services, (b) 10% increa
farmers that public extension services, private sector following percentage private sector technical support s
technical support schemes and farmer field schools have increases: (a) 10% increase and (c) 10% increase for farmer fi
capacity to attend to for extension services, (b) schools
10% for private sector
technical support schemes,
and (c) 10% for farmer field
schools
Indicator 14: Improved access to technical support by Provide summary of baseline Capacity building plans for By the last full year of project
smallholder farmers, as indicated by the percentage figures … smallholder farmers implementation: (a) 20% increase
14

Outputs to achieve Outcome 5
Project component 3: Conservation and restoration-rehabilitation of natural habitats
Outcome 6: Participatory
models of management and
incentive mechanisms catalysing
biodiversity conservation,
land/habitat restoration and
improved governance of priority
ecosystems enabled in target
districts
Outputs to achieve Outcome 6
increase in the numbers of farmers (by gender, ethnicity, developed to achieve the palm farmers (of whom15% are w
socioeconomic level and crop type) receiving regular following percentage (b) 20% for coffee farmers (of wh
technical support in relation to sustainable production and increases: (a) 20% increase are women), (c) 20% for cocoa far
management for oil palm farmers (15% whom 50% are women), and (d) 2
women), (b) 20% for coffee farmers (of whom 50% are wome
farmers (50% women), (c)
20% for cocoa farmers (50%
women), and (d) 20% rice
farmers (50% women)
Indicator 15: Expanded application of best management Provide summary of baseline Training on best 10,000 farmer households (4,000
practices, as indicated by the number of smallholder farmer figures … management practices 3,000 coffee; 1,000 cocoa; 2,000
households implementing best management practices delivered to 10,000 of the implementing best management p
total number (20,000) of by the last year of project implem
farmers to be trained by the
end of the project
Output 5.1. District-level plans of farmer support interventions, reflecting stakeholder priorities, zoning, and land classification
Output 5.2. Agricultural extension service systems including capacity building for extension officers strengthened in target districts to support smallholder farmer
promotion of and increased uptake of sustainable production practices and farming systems
Output 5.3. Support to smallholder capacity development and sustainability certification delivered for selected smallholder farmers within target districts
Output 5.4. Support delivered to smallholder farmers for land tenure/legalization, enabling achievement of sustainable and resilient production and farming syste
Indicator 16: Extent of participatory governance of priority Not applicable Management plans 50,000 ha and 5,000 households (
ecosystems, as indicated by the area and numbers of people developed for participatory 500 female-led households)
covered by management plans with incentive mechanisms models covering at least
that are under implementation for inclusive conservation- 50,000 ha and benefitting
restoration (such as social forestry, KEE scheme) 5,000 households (including
500 female-led households)
Indicator 17: Livelihood diversification to reduce pressures Not applicable Intervention plans 3,000 people (of whom 60% are w
on natural resources, as indicated the contribution of developed for livelihood
financial capital attributed to social forestry, which equals diversification benefitting
to: monthly income derived from social forestry (trade / 3,000 people (of whom 60%
household consumption of social forestry products) divided are women)
by total monthly income from other resources times 100.
Output 6.1. Detailed management (protection, sustainable utilization and restoration) plans for critical ecosystems in risk of commodity/crop expansion formulat
adopted in target districts
Output 6.2. Management models (e.g., social forestry) for critical ecosystems implemented in target districts, taking advantage of available incentive mechanisms
Output 6.3. Strengthened collaborative governance mechanisms and capacities supporting effective conservation and restoration-rehabilitation
15
Project component 4: Knowledge Management, Coordination, Collaboration, and Monitoring and Evaluation
Outcome 7: Integrated
knowledge management,
coordination and collaboration
to enhance knowledge of
factors to foster lessons learned
for replication in other areas
Outputs to achieve Outcome 7
Indicator 18: Documentation of sustainable production and Not applicable (a) 5 knowledge products (at (a) 20 knowledge products (at lea
sustainable landscape management associated knowledge, least 2 highlighting gender highlighting gender mainstreamin
as indicated by the number of systems developed or mainstreaming), (b) 10 communication pieces/stories (c)
strengthened including: (a) knowledge products, (b) communication traditional knowledge databases,
communication pieces/stories (c) traditional knowledge pieces/stories, (c) 2 research papers
databases, (d) research papers traditional knowledge
databases, (d) 0 research
papers
Indicator 19: Expanded FOLUR Community of Practice, as Not applicable (a) 5 country documents, (b) (a) 10 country documents, (b) 20 e
indicated by the number of country documents, events, 5 events, (c) 5 press reports 20 press reports
press promoting FOLUR
Output 7.1. Project implementation controlled through proactive steering committee functions and inclusive monitoring and evaluation
Output 7.2. Inclusive participation of local communities, including women and traditional peoples, facilitated through effective implementation of environmental
management plan
Output 7.3. Adaptive management methodology developed to monitor, evaluate and respond to causal impacts and systemic change
Output 7.4. Knowledge management and outreach system developed for supporting scaling out across jurisdictions/provinces and nationally, regionally and globa
Output 7.5. Participation in Global FOLUR community of practice and other relevant platforms on knowledge and lessons exchanges
16
Project Management

17
Implementing Partner
The Coordinating Ministry for Economic Affairs (CMEA).

As Implementing Partner, the CMEA is responsible for executing this project, includes:
• Project planning, coordination, management, monitoring, evaluation, and reporting. This includes
providing all required information and data necessary for timely, comprehensive, and evidence-
based project reporting, including results and financial data, as necessary. The Implementing Partner
will strive to ensure project-level M&E is undertaken by national institutes and is aligned with
national systems so that the data used and generated by the project supports national systems.
• Risk management as outlined in this Project Document.
• Procurement of goods and services, including human resources.
• Financial management, including overseeing financial expenditures against project budgets.
• Approving and signing the multiyear work plan.
• Approving and signing the combined delivery report at the end of the year.
• Signing the financial report or the funding authorization and certificate of expenditures.

18