Statistics of Passive Seismic survey over

Hundred of drilled Wells - Worldwide

Correlation Results before & after

Drilling Wells

Soran Talabani, PhD

K. Akrawi, PhD
12th July 2018
Confidential
Please do not distribute or copy
the contents of this
presentation
© GWW 2012
© GWW 2012
 Contents

➢ Objectives
➢ Background
➢ Application–surveys (Case Studies)
➢ Track Record of GDR Surveys
➢ Conclusions

2
© GWW 2012
 Background
Infrasonic Passive Differential Spectroscopy IPDS®
• New technology for hydrocarbon reservoir detection and
monitoring developed since 1995 by a group of scientists in
cooperation with international oil companies
• Currently set up for hydrocarbon detection in any onshore
environment
• Hardware: Ultra sensitive low frequency Oil Seismometer
• Applied and tested over 400 fields

© GWW 2012
 PORTABLE IPDS SEISMIC STATION
Costume Cars, Oil Sensors & Recorders
Ultra-Sensitive Oil Seismometer
30,000 – 120,000 V sec/m
18 kg
Linear Frequnce Band 0.1- 40 Hz
Electrodynamic
Inverse loop Magnetic System
Self Calibrating

Amplitude

IPDS
Oil Sensor Frequency
Raw Signal

Ranges of Field Measurement environment varieties

© GWW 2012
5

Spectrogram Comparison between Oil & Dry Reservoir

GeoDynamics

Oil Dry

When Earth Hydrocarbon are Talking,

GeoDynamics IPDS sensors are Listening

© GWW 2012
6

TECHNOLOGY
ₒ Infra Passive Seismic Differential Spectroscopy “IPDS” is new technology for
hydrocarbon reservoir ( Gas & Oil) detection and monitoring natural signals occurring in
the ground.
ₒ IPDS can be acquired as Pre-seismic or after seismic survey, and applies IPDS as stand
alone or complementary technology for hydrocarbon exploration and monitoring tool.
ₒ It is clean and environment friendly, it can be run in any conditions.
ₒ Data acquisition employs custom designed surface arrays of ultra high resolution
broadband seismometers. Our in-house processing and evaluation technology results in
reservoir hydrocarbon indicator and give net-pay zone thickness estimation of
hydrocarbons in the subsurface.
ₒ Used in conjunction with conventional exploration technologies (2D-3D seismic, gravity,
magnetic surveys, surface geo-chemistry, remote sensing & etc.) to reduce
uncertainties.
ₒ Makes a considerable contribution to reduce the dry well risk (avoid dry wells), resulting
in lower costs in investment ($ per oil barrel).

© GWW 2012
 How IPDS Survey data is collected in the field
Recording Time from 40 min. to 2 days

60 cm

60 cm

Row IPDS Data

© GWW 2012
8

A Unique way to Explore and Monitor Oil and Gas Fields

Gas
GOC
Oil
OWC
Oil
Water

Passive Acoustic Seismic Signals Can differentiate between fluid

phases (Hydrocarbon & Water) from the surface

© GWW 2012
 In Exploration,
2D/3D
Maturing Leads
&
Seismic
Drillable Prospect

Passive
Others Seismic
IPDS
Mature
Prospect

Geo-
Chemistry Gravity

© GDI July 2008

© GWW 2012
Recording the Behavior of Multiphase of Hydrocarbon Fluids
in the Porous Reservoir Rock Media
Character Recognitions
Earth surface Movement

© GDI July 2008

© GWW 2012
 Comparison Between HC and Water
Spectral Analysis Q-field Campaign

Spectral analysis of
signals recorded in
the northern part
of the Q field

Reservoir area,
red curve

acoustic spectrum: Spectral anomalies Outside area,

characteristic for blue curve
hydrocarbon lines hydrocarbon
reservoirs

© GWW 2012
 How data is collected in the field
Recording Time from 40 min. to 2 days

60 cm

60 cm

© GWW 2012
 Field Survey Operation

© GWW 2012
 IPDS® Survey Before 2D/3D Seismic
(Example: Exploration area with 10,000 sq.kms)
120 kms

© GWW 2012 14
 Survey Methods
Line Profiles - Survey Measurement
Quick evaluation & delineation of Exploration areas
Play, Lead, Prospect evaluation & delineation

© GWW 2012 GeoDynamics Sensor

 Survey Methods
Normal 3D Grids Survey Measurement
3D Grids Survey are suitable for:
• Prospect evaluation & delineation before drilling
• Monitoring Developed Field

© GWW 2012 GeoDynamics Sensor

 RHI Well Monitoring
Anomalies while Flowing and Closed Oil Well

Closed well
Flowing well

Pressure build up at a
Well Survey After 4 Months depletion drive well
British Gas after shut down.
South Italy

Oil Oil

Oil
Water
© GWW 2012
 Oil System

To find hydrocarbon in
any area, we need to have
4 factors by studying:
1. Source Rocks
2. Reservoirs
3. Cap Rocks (Seals)
4. Traps
RHI
Application is
Directly confirming
Existing or Not the
Oil System

© GWW 2012
 GeoDynamics 80 Wells Surveys results in UAE

Bida Qemzan Field

Marghum Field
12 wells Correlation
20 wells Correlation
Results 89%
Results 91%

Bu Hasa Field Jebel Ali

18 wells Correlation 3 wells Correlation
Results 92% Results Good

Jarn Yapgour
GeoDynamics 11 wells Correlation
Surveys Results 87%

Qusawira Field
Shah Field HB and other wells 10 wells Correlation
4 wells Correlation 10 wells Correlation Results 97%
Results 90% Results 97%

© GWW 2012
Objectives

➢ To Demonstrate the passive seismic survey with wells

results.
➢ To Show the statistical results of drilled wells before and
after drilling.
➢ To provide the correlation coefficient results between net
pay zones (NPZ) and Passive Seismic anomalies Reservoir
Hydrocarbon Indications – (RHI)
➢ To Avoid Drilling Dry Wells, Reduce Cost & Minimize Risk.

20
© GWW 2012
BACKGROUND

1. Total run 130 worldwide Passive Seismic surveys

2. 17 passive seismic surveys with developed fields and exploration areas in UAE

3. Total passive seismic measuring points are over 20,000 data points

4. The survey covered over one hundreds drilled wells, with over 15 wells before

drilling

5. The wells correlation with passive seismic survey results (success ratio) is

ranging between 80% to 97%.

6. To calculate net pay zones required: Wells drilling data, test results, well logs,

water saturation and porosity logs. Other need current well status.

© GWW 2012
Statistical outcomes of Passive Seismic wells survey
and drilling Results in UAE

• Bida Qemzan Field 12 wells Correlation Results 89%

• Bu Hasa Field 18 wells Correlation Results 92%

• Shah Field 4 wells Correlation Results 90%

• HB and other wells 10 wells Correlation Results 97%

• Qusawira Field 10 wells Correlation Results 97%

• Jarn Yapgour 11 wells Correlation Results 87%

• Marghum Field 20 wells Correlation Results 91%

• Jebel Ali 3 wells have Good Correlation Results

• Other 15 scattered wells have Good Correlation Results

Over hundred Wells correlation with Reservoir Hydrocarbon Indications,

The success ratio is between 80% to 97%

© GWW 2012
 Non-Oil Oil linear/oil&non-oil

JORDAN

ITALY-1
Passive Seismic Hydrocarbon Anomalies

UKRAINE-1

UAE-1/developed
Over various campaigns

UAE-2/undeveloped-proven

MOROCCO

ITALY-2

UKRAINE-2

SWITZERLAND-1

Kuwait-

Texas-USA-
23
© GWW 2012
 QW Field
(Objective: To calibrate passive seismic technique in
Exploration and delineate hydrocarbon distribution)
24
© GWW 2012
© GWW 2012
 QW - Correlation of Passive Seismic IPDS results with QW-Wells Test Data

2540000 Qusahwira
Averaged amplitude ratio (R12, R1, R2, R3)

Oil well Qw-7

Qw-11

B 2,460 bopd
Qw-2
2530000

4,776 bopd
Dry well
Transitional zone
Qw-8 Qw-4 Qw-6
06
241 bopd
3,650 bopd
-2
26

Q-10a Dry wells

SL

2520000 2.4

Q-10b Qw-1 2.2

833 bopd
2 tested oil in zone A Qw-10 C2 2

1.8
C1
1.6
Qw-5 Qw-9
1.4
Qw-3
868 bopd 1.2

1.1

0.8
260000 270000 280000

0.6

2 Dry wells
© GWW 2012
 Qusahwira Wells Correlation Between
Proven Gross Hydrocarbon and Reservoir Hydrocarbon Indication (GHC And RHI)

Correlation Coefficient = 97%

300
R2 = 0.97
250
(97%)
200
GHC-ft

150
100
50
Qw Wells
0
0.0500 0.1500 0.2500 0.3500 0.4500 0.5500
Reservoir Hydrocarbon Indicator Value (RHI)
Correlation between RHI & GHC oil is almost perfect. Correlation coefficient is better than
0.97 due to the `undisturbed´ reservoir (equilibrium system, undeveloped26 reservoir)
© GWW 2012
 Comparison of Passive Seismic results with oil distribution in the Qw-field Thamama-F
(Profile survey)

DEPTH

Qw-9 Qw-16 Qw-11

© GWW 2012
 Bu Field
(Objective: To calibrate passive seismic technique in
monitoring oil reservoirs and delineate hydrocarbon
distribution)
28
© GWW 2012
© GWW 2012
 4D Monitoring

Discovered New
Exploration
Potential

© GWW 2012
 Bu Hasa - Wells, Correlation Between Original Cumulative Net Oil Column
and Geospectra Direct Oil Indicator

Correlation Coefficient = 92%

250
Wells New Wells

Bu-528
Origional Oil Column - Ft

200

Bu-523
150

Bu-526
100
2
Bu-537 R92%= 0.9152
50 Bu-521

0
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70

Direct Hydrocarbon Indictor

© GWW 2012
 Correlation west flank results

Bu-521 Recent Bu Hasa West

• Recent Bu field Drilled Wells after IPDS
Flank Wells
CorrelationCorrelation
Bu-526 Between Original Oil Net Coefficient
Pay & ADNR Oil Indicator survey
(A123
= 92%nm)
0.8 Bu-523 • Passive Seismic Indicator & Oil Column
0.7 Bu-528

0.6
0.5
•Oil Indicator

0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
Bu-521 Bu-526 Bu-523 Bu-528

B-521 B-526 B-523 B-528

31
© GWW 2012
 Shah Field
(Objective: To calibrate passive seismic technique in
monitoring oil reservoirs and delineate hydrocarbon
32
distribution)
© GWW 2012
© GWW 2012
 S Field: Monitoring, Water Front & Delineation
Passive Seismic Spectroscopy Survey

DH - Wells - F6cN

Sy-09

Measuring Point Survey

2545000 Measuring Well Survey Sy-03

Sy-20

2540000
Sy-10 Sy-01
Sy-21
Recorded Data
Sy-23 Sy-07 Points and 15
Sy-06
2535000
Sy-16 Well Locations
Sy-04

Sy-02
2530000 Sy-05

Sy-08

2525000

780000 785000 790000 795000 800000

060525

2/6/2006 33
© GWW 2012
 Depleted Shah, F6mcN (IPDS anomaly) NPZ
Area due to Oil Field Monitoring & Water Front Survey Sy-09

long Oil P3
DO

production
Depleted area due to
2545000 heavy oil production Possible New
Sy-03
Exploration
F DO
Potential
Prospect
Sy-20
P1
2540000

SP
Sy-36

Possible New Sy-10

SO Sy-01
Sy-42
Sy-30
Exploration
SP
DO Sy-21 SP
WDW

Potential SP
Possible Water
Sy-11 Sy-18

Fault Prospect SP
Sy-29
SP
Front
2535000

Sy-23WDW Sy-07
Sy-19 0.85
Simsima
Sy-06
Sy-44 DO
SUSP
Sy-31 Sy-17 0.8
SP Sy-16
SO P&A
Sy-13 SP
Reservoir
SUSP DO 0.75
P&A
Sy-12
Sy-28 Sy-04 0.7
SP
WDW SP 0.65
Sy-15
0.6 Shah F6 (IPDS anomaly) NPZ

SP 0.55
Sy-09
DO
2530000

Sy-02

2545000
0.5
DO Sy-46 Sy-33
0.45
Sy-03
DO
Sy-14 Sy-47
SP SO Sy-05 Sy-20

SP TESTING 0.4 P1

2540000
SP
Sy-36
SO Sy-01

DO 0.35
Sy-10
DO Sy-21
Sy-30
SP
WDWSP
Sy-42

SP
Sy-11 Sy-18

Sy-45 0.3 SP
Sy-29
SP

2535000
Sy-23WDW Sy-07
Sy-19 0.85
Sy-06
Sy-44 DO
SUSP
Sy-31 Sy-17 0.8
SP Sy-16 P&A
SP 0.25 Sy-12
Sy-28 Sy-04
SO SP
Sy-13
SUSP
P&A
DO 0.75
0.7

Sy-08 SP
WDW SP
Sy-15
0.65
0.6
0.2 SP 0.55

DO

2530000
Sy-02
0.5
DO Sy-46 Sy-33
0.45
Sy-14 Sy-47
SO Sy-05
0.15 SP SP TESTING 0.4
2525000

DO 0.35
Sy-45 0.3
SP
0.1
0.25
Sy-08

More Oil
0.2
DO
0.15

2525000
0.1

0.05 P2
0.05
0

Potential P2 0
34
780000 785000 790000 795000 800000

© GWW 2012
780000 785000 790000 795000 800000
 Shah Wells,
Correlation Coeficient NPZ & F6mcN
Correlation Coefficient = 90%
850
Sy-16
800 798
R2 = 90%
750
700 Sy-23
NPZ-Ft

650 660
Sy-1
600 600
580 Sy-47 between CDH045 and CDH046
550 Sy-20

500 500
offset
F6mcN NPZ - ft
450
Linear (F6mcN NPZ - ft)
400
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90
F6mcN (IPDS)

35
© GWW 2012
 BH Prospect
(Objective: To support prospect delineation / risking
and proposed well location)
© GWW 2012
© GWW 2012
Pilot Passive Seismic (IPDS) Survey for BH1 & Proposed BH Popup well location

PDD-Exploration & Geophysics

BH Popup Survey Proposal
69
Total MPs 40

BH-1

Proposed BH Popup

© GWW 2012
 BH Prospect
Reservoir Hydrocarbon Indications (RHI) map

BH-1
Dry Well
BH-2
Well

38
© GWW 2012
 Correlation between
BH and surrounding cumulative
Wells, net pay zones
Correlation Between
Proven Gross Hydrocarbon and Reservoir Hydrocarbon Indication (GHC And RHI)
(cNPZ) and Geodynamics reservoir
hydrocarbon indicator values (RHI)
Correlation Coefficient = 97.6%
300
R2 = 0.9761
250
(97%)
200
cNPZ-ft

BH Popup Proposed Well predict

150 Qw2
Qw1
GHC ft

Qw5 Qw11
100

50 Qw7
Qw4
0 BH1
0.0500 0.1500 0.2500 0.3500 0.4500 0.5500
Reservoir Hydrocarbon Indicator Value (RHI)
HB-1 were measured and extrapolated to predict
39GHC
© GWW 2012
 JY Field
(Objective: To calibrate passive seismic technique in
monitoring oil reservoirs and delineate
compartmentalized hydrocarbon distribution)

40
© GWW 2012
© GWW 2012
 Location of Passive Seismic Survey Area
J Field

Hw1
2694000

2692000

Jy3
2690000

Jy6
2688000

2686000 Jy7
Jy10 Jy4
Jy9
2684000 Jy2
Jy1
2682000 Jy8
Jy5
2680000

2678000

248000 250000 252000 254000 256000 258000 260000 262000 264000 266000 268000

41
© GWW 2012
 Jarn Yaphour RHI and Fault Map

42
© GWW 2012
 Correlation Coefficient = 87%

© GWW 2012
 RHI Passive Seismic
JY w ells correlation RHI & cNPZ
100 0.50
cNPZ Well 90 0.45
80 RHI 0.40
70 GHC (Passive Seismic) 0.35
60
(SW% Log) 0.30
GHC from

RHI
50 0.25
40 0.20
30 0.15
20 0.10
10 0.05
0 0.00
Jy3 Jy2 Jy7 Jy6 Jy4 Jy10 Jy9 Jy1 Jy5 Jy8
Jy W ells

JY-2

JY-9
Gas Cr oss- over
MD TVD
- SS
2.2 RHOB (G/C3) 2.7 Gas Fl ag
0 GR (GAPI)
100 FEET FEET 30 NPHI ( PU) 0 100 SW (PU) 0
x
d
In
re
o
C

Core Index Core Porosity 50 to 0 pu s cal e o

)-N
rn
G
c(L
e
R

x
d
In
re
o
C

o
)-N
rn
G
c(L
e
R

0 GR (GAPI) 100
MD

FEET
TVD
-

FEET
SS
2.2
30
Gas Cr oss- over
RHOB (g/cm3)
NPHI ( PU)
2.7 Gas Fl ag
0 100 SW (PU) 0
x
d
In
re
o
C

JY-1
JY-7
Core Porosity 50 to 0 pu s cal e

Gas Cr oss- Over

MD TVD
- SS
x
d
In
re
o
C

JY-5
Gas Fl ag

JY-3
o
)-N
rn
G
c(L
e
R
0 GR (GAPI) 100 30 NPHI ( PU) 0 100 SW 0
-10300 -10300

Core Porosity 50 to 0 pu s cal e

10400
x
d
In
re
o
C

o
)-N
rn
G
c(L
e
R
Gas Cr oss- over
MD TVD
- SS

JY-8
2.2 RHOB (G/C3) 2.7 Gas Fl ag

JY-10
0 GR (GAPI)
100 FEET FEET 30 NPHI ( PU) 0 100 SW (PU) 0
Gas Cr oss- over Gas Cr oss- over
MD TVD
- SS MD TVD
- SS
2.2 RHOB (g/cm3) 2.7 Gas Fl ag 2.2 RHOB (g/cm3) 2.7 Gas Fl ag
Core Porosity 50 to 0 pu s cal e
0 GR (GAPI) 100 30 NPHI ( PU) 0 GR (GAPI) 100 30 NPHI ( PU) 0 100 SW (PU)
FEET FEET 0 100 SW (PU) 0 FEET FEET 0

Core Porosity 50 to 0 pu s cal e

Core Porosity 50 to 0 pu s cal e

o
)-N
rn
G
c(L
e
R

10500

10400
MD TVD
- SS
Gas Cr oss- over
Well JY-8S
2.2 RHOB (g/cm3) 2.7

JY-4
Gas Fl ag
0 GR (GAPI) 100 FEET FEET 30 NPHI ( PU) 0 100 SW (PU) 0
10500
Core Index
2.20
Core Porosity 50 to 0 pu s cal e 10600
WELL_NAME: JY-8-1 OPERATOR:
10500
TVD: 10710.35702 UWI: JY008102S
x
d
In
re
o
C -10400 -10400 -10400 -10400 -10400 -10400 -10400 MovHC

o
)-N
rn
G
c(L
e
R

Gas Cr oss- over UnmovHC

MD TVD
- SS
10500 2.2 RHOB(G/C3) 2.7 Gas Fl ag
0 GR (GAPI) 100 FEET FEET 30 NPHI ( PERC)
0 100 SW (PU) 0
MD TVD-SS 0.20 LIS:ILM.DIL;1 (OHMM) 2000.00 Dolomitic
THAMAMA ZONE C THAMAMA ZONE C
0.20 LIS:ILD.DIL;1 (OHMM) 2000.00 2.20 LIS:RHOB.FDN;4 (G/C3) 2.70 Gas Flag
Core Porosity 50 to 0 pu s cal e
FEET FEET
0.00 LIS:GR.FDN;4 (GAPI) 100.00 0.20 LIS:MSFL.BHC;4 (OHMM) 2000.00 30.00 LIS:NPHI.FDN;4 (PU) 0.00 0.20 RENAME:CKH.COR;1 (MD) 2000.00 100.00 LIS:SW.RIG;1 (PU) 0.00

C xednIro P e r f o r a t oi n I n t e r v a sl

swohSerC ANNO2 CorePorosiyt 50ot 0puscale Core Permeabiytil 2. 2000

- md

R GL(ce N-)nr G(cerno )nr O p e n ( Y e )l , C ol s e d ( R e d )

-10300

10500
THAMAMA ZONE B
10600

THAM. SUBZONE B II
-10500 -10500 -10500 -10500 -10500 -10500 -10500

10500
x
d
In
re
o
C

o
)-N
rn
G
c(L
e
R

THAM. SUBZONE B IIIU

JY-6

0 GR (GAPI) 100
MD

FEET
TVD
-

FEET
SS
2.2
30
Gas Cr oss- over
RHOB (g/cm3)
NPHI ( PU)
2.7 Gas Fl ag
0 100 SW (PU) 0
THAM. SUBZONE B IIIL
Core Porosity 50 to 0 pu s cal e

-10600 -10600 -10600

-10400

THAM. SUBZONE B IIIL

10800

Deviated
-10700

Well THAM. SUBZONE B V

THAM. SUBZONE B VI
THAMAMA ZONE B

-10500

-10800

44
© GWW 2012
Correlation Between GHC & RHI in J Wells
ADCO Undeveloped Fields (UDF)
 Uw - Mr And
West Bb Flank Surveys
(Objectives: To support identification / delineation of Mirfa South Lead &
the proposed AOR well location in West Bab Flank)

45
© GWW 2012
© GWW 2012
 Bida Al-Qemzan RHI Map from Bida Al-Qemzan
Passive Seismic acquired at the wells GHC Map from Wells
BQ-4 BQ-4
2638000

2638000
2636000

2636000
BQ-1 BQ-1

BQ-5 BQ-5
2634000

2634000
2632000

2632000

BQ-7
2630000

BQ-2 BQ-7
2630000

BQ-2
2628000

2628000

BQ-3 BQ-3
BQ-6 46 BQ-6
© GWW 2012
733000 734000 735000 736000 737000 738000 739000 740000 733000 734000 735000 736000 737000 738000 739000 740000
 Correlation Between GHC and RHI

Correlation Between cNPZ (wells) & RHI (Passive Seismic)

1.00
RHI (Passive Seismic)
0.90 cNPZ Ft (Wells) 250
230
0.80

0.70 Predict 200

cNPZ - ft (Wells)
West Bab AOR Well
0.60
RHI

141 150
0.50 128 126

0.40
100
83 85
0.30
66
55
0.20
50
35
0.10 19 20
5
0
0.00 0

AOR Loc.
MF-1

UW-1
BQ-1

BQ-4

BQ-5

BQ-7

BQ-6

BQ-2

BQ-3

Mf1 T.Loc

BB-174

BB-548
• Gross Hydrocarbon Column – Wells (GHC)
• Passive Seismic - Reservoir Hydrocarbon Indicator (RHI) 47
© GWW 2012
 Figure 17: Regional correlation between IPDS® (RHI) values from the 11
surveyed wells and the cNPZ values from well Hydrocarbon-saturation
48 logs (ft.).
© GWW 2012
 CORRELATION Between RHI & cNPZ

250 Correlation Coefficient = 88%

Bq2

200

150
cNPZ (ft)

Bq3 Uw1

y = 229.66x + 15.66
100 Bq5 Bq6
R2 = 0.8876
Mf1
50 Bb548 Bq7

Bq1 Bq4
0 RHI (%)
Bb174
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20

49
© GWW 2012
 Dubai 4 surveys
M-field area
(producing gas field, monitoring + delineation)
UAE-Oman thrust belt zone
complicated, highly faulted and active structure
50
© GWW 2012
© GWW 2012
 E Marg-1

M3
M 14

M7 M 10A
M 12
M 10B
M 11
M1
M 16
8 M4
M 15
M5
M6

M9 M 17

A123nm M2
M 13

(with top Shuaiba)

Nor
th

ADNR HC Indicator
3D Passive Seismic Map
(A123nm)

Gas Fluid

Top Maddud

Structural 3D Map
Topon
Shuaiba
Top Shuaiba Gas Reservoir

51
© GWW 2012
 Correlation Plot, M-Field

Correlation Coefficient = 91%

1.0
Wells NE
Wells SW
0.9
M1 (?) 2765000

M12
0.8
M 10B
0.7
M 14 (cl) M 11
2763000

M1
0.6
M 15
M 4 (cl)
A123nm

0.5
M6
2761000

0.4 M 8/16 Permeability

M 13 (cl) M5 M 17 barrier
0.3 M7
M 2 (cl) separating
M9
0.2 M 3Kub-1 2759000

the field
0.1
effectively
into two parts
0.0 2757000
359000 361000 363000

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
Net Pay Shuaiba (ft)
NPZ thickness (ft), Shuaiba Fm

© GWW 2012
 Correlation Plot, M-Field: Unification

Correlation Coefficient = 97%

1.0
Wells NE Regression curve without M1,M2
Wells SW
0.9
M1 (?)
M12
M5 long-term
0.8 M 13 (cl) M 17
producers
M 10B
0.7
M 14 (cl) M 11
M 2 (cl)
M1
0.6
M 15
M 4 (cl)
A123nm

M9
0.5
M6

0.4 M 8/16

0.3 M7
Effectively reduced
NPZ after 20 years
0.2 M 3Kub-1 of continuous
production
0.1

0.0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

NPZNet Pay Shuaiba

thickness (ft)
(ft), Shuaiba Fm

© GWW 2012
 Sudan
Surveys

(Objective: Exploration and delineate

hydrocarbon distribution)
54
© GWW 2012
© GWW 2012
RHI-IPDS Map identified 8 potential leads & confirmed 6 Discoveries

Confirmed New 8 Leads

AZQ-A-1
Discoveries confirmed HC Limit AZQ-N-new-1

AZQ-N & NW AZQ-N-new-2

confirmed HC Limit

AZQ-NE-new-3
AZQ-Center
confirmed HC Limit

AZQ-NE-new-4
AZQ-W
confirmed HC Limit
AZQ-NE-new-5
AZQ-SW
confirmed HC Limit
AZQ-NE-new-6
AZQ-SW-1
confirmed HC Limit
HILBA-S-new-7
HILBA
confirmed HC Limit
HILBA-S-new-8

© GWW 2012
 Sudan Block-4
Correlation between RHI Average value & NPZ-m – 2D & 3D RHI Maps

Correlation Coefficient = 96.7%

© GWW 2012
Correlation between RHI & Wells NPZ Thickness m (GNPOC, Block-4)

80.000

70.000 RHI RHI Average Method

60.000 NPZ R = 96.7%
50.000

NPZ 40.000 RHI

m 30.000 %
20.000

10.000

0.000

© GWW 2012
 Kazakhestan
Surveys

58
© GWW 2012
© GWW 2012
 Moldabek Field Analog Reservoir
(RHI)
L. Cretaceous Hydrocarbon
M. Jurassic Indicator (RHI)
Reservoirs

3D Map
M. Jurassic
Reservoirs

© GWW 2012
 Correlation Between DHI & NPZ (Moldabek Wells)
Correlation Coefficient = 79%

L. Cretaceous Oil API = 200 - 270

Direct Hydrocarbon Indication (DHI)

0.28
cNPT is ranging 35 - 57 m
M. Jurassic Oil API = 300 - 490
cNPT is ranging 16 - 43 m
423
0.23
637 5

0.18 2005
437 2043
1262 R2 = 79%
902
0.13

0.08
0 20 40 60 80 100
Cummulative Net Pay Zones (M)
© GWW 2012
 USA
Over 60 Surveys

61
© GWW 2012
© GWW 2012
 TOP OF MISSISSIPPI 3D Seismic

5.

Reef well
Basal Mississippi
drilled 2002
260,000 Bbls
4.
flowing 45
Depleted 4 wells P/A
Bopd through
8/64 choke
BHP 1800
2.
psig
1. 3.

Reef well drilled

2003 Producing
30 MCF with
plunger lift
BHP 400 psig

62

© GWW 2012
 HYDROCARBON INDICATOR MAP

J1

5.
3659000
Reef well
Basal Mississippi3658800 drilled 2002
260,000 Bbls Producing 45
Depleted 4 wells 3658600
P/A Bopd through
HW

4.
8/64 choke
WJ1
BHP 1800
3658400 psig

3658200

Reef well 3.
drilled 2003 3658000 WL
JNS3

1.
Producing 30 WM1A
2. Producing
MCF with 3657800
Conglomerat
plunger lift e reservoir
BHP 400 psig 3657600
525400 525600 525800 526000 526200 526400 63
526600
© GWW 2012
 KING SAND PROSPECT
JacobsTexas
Runnels County, 2 Fnc (5)

MP

HE
3537400

3537300
CRJ031 NW CRJ020
NE
0.98
0.96
3537200 CRJ022
0.94
0.92
KD CRJ023
S2 0.9
3537100
0.88
CRJ024
0.86
0.84
3537000 CRJ017
CRJ009 CRJ025 0.82
0.8
0.78
3536900 CRJ014
0.76
0.74
CRJ018 0.72
3536800 WJ CRJ006
0.7
CRJ032 0.68
Jacob #1 Dry Hole SC
0.66
3536700 CRJ008
0.64
CRJ001 0.62
CRJ026
WE 3
CRJ003 CRJ010
E1 0.6
3536600
CRJ004

CRJ011
3536500
SW CRJ002
CRJ028 SE
CRJ027

402100 402200 402300 402400 402500 402600 402700 64

402800 402900

© GWW 2012
 WEST TEXAS DELTAIC TANNEHILL PROSPECT

CBS069
CBS071
3664000 CBS075 CBS074
CBS072
CBS073

Mosquito 4 BS Fnc (5) CBSLL

CBS053

CBS033

CBS017

CBS018 CBS79C
CBS035
CBS019
3663500
CBS036
CBS015
CBS079
CBS79A 0.95
CBS021

7 foot oil CBS065

CBS023
CBS022
CBS037

CBS080
CBS79B
0.9
0.85
column CBS066
CBS025

CBS040
CBS039
CBS081
0.8
3663000 CBS026

above CBS027
CBS041
CBS082
0.75
0.7

Saltwater
CBS068 CBS029
CBS083
0.65
CBS031

0.6
drilled 1997 3662500
CBS084

0.55
CBS046 CBS086
0.5
CBS10A
0.45
Dry hole
CBS12A CBS20A

CBS048 CBS087
CBS14A
0.4
CBS078

drilled 3662000
CBS08A CBS09A

CBS13A
CBS19A

CBS15A
CBS21A

CBS059 CBS051
CBS088
0.35
0.3
January CBS07A CBS05A CBS16A CBS18A
CBS100
CBS49A
CBS88B
CBS88A
0.25

2004 CBS04A CBS06A CBS17A

CBS058
CBS057 0.2

3661500 CBS02A CBS03A 15.08.03/07.01.04

65
© GWW 2012 344000 344500 345000 345500 346000 346500 347000 347500 348000
 Zavala County, Texas

• Zavala County, Texas

• Producing, Multi zone field with

• water injection
• Determine remaining potential

© GWW 2012
 Zavala County, Texas
FNC5 Hydrocarbon Indicator
Torch-5-Fnc (5)

CZT031
CZT030
3180000
CZT029
CZT028
CZT027

In field remaining CZT026

CZT062
CZT063
CZT069

3179500
hydrocarbon indications CZT 25D
CZT059

CZT060
CZT061
CZT064 CZT070

CZT072
CZT071

CZT 24D
CZT022 CZT065 CZT068
CZT067
0.95
CZT021 CZT023
CZT020
CZT019 CZT032
CZT126 DZT058 CZT066
CZT079
CZT074
CZT073 CZT097
CZT075
0.9
3179000
CZT018 CZT092CZT098

CZT017
CZT125
CZT033 DZT057 CZT078
CZT076
CZT090CZT096 0.85
CZT035 CZT129 CZT093
CZT094
CZT016
CZT036
CZT034
CZT056
CZT080
CZT127 CZT083CZT095 CZT091
0.8
CZT128
CZT015 CZT087
CZT037
CZT045
0.75
CZT014 CZT081
CZT099
3178500 CZT038 CZT082
CZT089
0.7
CZT012 CZT040
CZT039 CZT043CZT044 CZT101 CZT086 CZT088
CZT013 CZT041 CZT100 0.65
CZT046 CZT084
CZT011 CZT042 CZT085 0.6
Further development 3178000 CZT009
CZT010 DZT007
CZT005
CZT102
CZT103
CZT115
CZT116 0.55
0.5
prospects
CZT006 CZT048
DZT008

CZT055
CZT047 CZT114
0.45
CZT049 CZT117
CZT051CZT050
CZT054 CZT130 0.4
3177500 CZT052
CZT053 CZT112
CZT132 0.35
CZT113
CZT131 0.3
CZT111

CZT138
0.25
3177000 0.2
CZT136 CZT108
CZT110
0.15
CZT137 CZT139
CZT143 CZT109
CZT107 CZT140
CZT134 CZT145CZT106CZT141
3176500
CZT105 CZT144
CZT135

CZT133

© GWW 2012 404000 404500 405000 405500 406000 406500 407000

 Oil Field in Texas-USA
Hydrocarbon Indicator
TOP OF MISSISSIPPI
5.

Reef Buildup
drilled after
Basal Mississippi
4. survey
260,000 Bbls
Depleted 4 wells P/A Producing Oil

2.

1. 3.

© GWW 2012
 HYDROCARBON INDICATOR

J1

5.
3659000

Basal Mississippi3658800 Producing

260,000 Bbls Conglomerat
Depleted 4 wells 3658600
P/A HW e reservoir
4. WJ1

3658400

3658200

Reef well 3. Reef well

drilled 2003 3658000 WL
JNS3

1. drilled 2002
Producing 30 WM1A
2.
Producing 45
MCF with 3657800
Bopd through
plunger lift
8/64 choke
BHP 400 psig 3657600
525400 525600 525800 526000 526200 526400 526600
BHP 1800
© GWW 2012 psig
 HASTINGS RANCH
Archer County, Texas

HASTINGS RANCH

ARCHER CO.
REGULAR FIELD
GEOSPEC
survey area

ANTELOPE
FIELD

© GWW 2012
 HASTINGS RANCH
Archer County, Texas

SEISMIC SHOWING •
TOP OF CADDO
AT HASTINGS RANCH
Seismic
showing
top of Caddo

© GWW 2012
 Hydrocarbon HASTINGS RANCH
Indicator FNC5 Hastings- 2- Fnc (5)

CHNW CHR003 CHR005 CHR022 CHR021

0.95
CHT1 CHR002 CHR004 CHR023
3708600 CHR006 0.9
CHTST
DHR001 CHR009 CHR008 CHR025 CHR024
0.85
0.8
3708400
CHR012 CHR010 CHR011
CHR007
CHR026 0.75
CHRT5
0.7
3708200 CHR014 CHR015 CHR016 CHR030 CHR028 0.65
0.6
DHR013 CHR018 CHR017 CHR031 CHR027
0.55
3708000
0.5
CHR033 CHR019 CHR020 CHR032 CHR029
0.45
Depleted 0.4
3707800 CHR034 CHR049 CHR050
Strawn 0.35
Production CHR044 CHR042 CHR040 CHR038 CHR037 CHRSW CHR047 CHR048 CHR052 0.3
3707600 0.25
CHR046 CHR043 CHR041 CHR039 CHR036 CHR035 CHR051 0.2
0.15
3707400 CHR045
0.1
551600 551800 552000 552200 552400 552600 552800 553000 553200 553400
© GWW 2012
 KING SAND PROSPECT
Runnels County, Texas

H.F.B. Field
False Arrowhead Field 156,000 Bbls
136,000 Bbls 39.000 mcf
103,000 mcf
3 wells

Jacob #1 Dry Hole

© GWW 2012
 Jacobs 2 Fnc (5)

MP

KING SAND PROSPECT3537400

HE

Runnels County, Texas

3537300
CRJ031 NW CRJ020
NE
0.98
0.96
3537200 CRJ022
0.94
0.92
KD CRJ023
S2 0.9
3537100
0.88
CRJ024
0.86
0.84
3537000 CRJ017
CRJ009 CRJ025 0.82
0.8
0.78
3536900 CRJ014
0.76
0.74
CRJ018 0.72
3536800
Jacob #1 Dry Hole WJ CRJ006
0.7
CRJ032 0.68
SC
0.66
3536700 CRJ008
0.64
CRJ001 0.62
CRJ026
WE 3
CRJ003 CRJ010
E1 0.6
3536600
CRJ004

CRJ011
3536500
SW CRJ002
CRJ028 SE
CRJ027

402100 402200 402300 402400 402500 402600 402700 402800 402900

© GWW 2012 6.03.03

 HORIZONTAL AUSTIN CHALK
Reservoir Hydrocarbon Indicator (RHI) Map

BG_RIO Fnc (5)

CBG131 CBG148 CBG149
1

3373200 CBG129 CBG144 CBG406 0.95

Well #1 CBG128
DBG145
DBG147 0.9
DBG407
0.85
3373000 EBG143
CBG127 CBG161 0.8
CBG142 0.75
CBG126 CBG159
CBG160
3372800
0.7
CBG125 CBG158
CBG141
CBG157 0.65
3372600 CBG124
DBG140
DBG156
-- No Data -- 0.6

0.55
CBG123 DBG139
3372400
Well #2 CBG122
DBG138
CBG155 GBG405 0.5
CBG134 CBG154 0.45
CBG136
3372200 DBG153 0.4
CBG137
CBG133 DBG152
CBG152 0.35
3372000 0.3
CBG132
CBG151
0.25
CBG150
3371800 0.2
759000 759500 760000 760500 761000

11.05.03

© GWW 2012
 WEST TEXAS DELTAIC
TANNEHILL PROSPECT

TWO MILES

© GWW 2012
 WEST TEXAS DELTAIC
TANNEHILL PROSPECT

© GWW 2012
 Conclusions
➢ Worldwide acquired over 130 Passive seismic surveys, with
over 20,000 data measuring points.
➢ Over hundred drilled wells survey have 86% to 97%
correlation with Reservoir Hydrocarbon Indications.
➢ Over 15 drilled wells have good correlation results with
Passive Seismic survey after drilling came very close to the
predication - over 86% accuracy.
➢ Statistically; average correlation coefficient between net
pay zone and Passive seismic anomalies over 80%
➢ Reduce drilling risk below 20%
© GWW 2012
 END

© GWW 2012