Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Entrepreneurial Intentions and Capabilities of Women
Entrepreneurial Intentions and Capabilities of Women
GRADUATE SCHOOL
Entrepreneurial
Intentions and
Capabilities of
Women
Research Paper
Submitted to:
Dr. Juris C. Ponio
Submitted by:
Kim Arrianne A. Cunanan
Women and men aren't as different as you might think: A review of dozens of studies
found that men and women are basically alike when it comes to personality, thinking ability and
leadership. The differences that do exist may reflect social expectations, not biology. Despite this
evidence, the media continue to spread the idea that the sexes are fundamentally different —
and running a new business, which typically begins as a small business, such as a start-up
company, offering a product, process or service. It has been defined as the "...capacity and
willingness to develop, organize, and manage a business venture along with any of its risks in
For centuries females have taken the back seat in male oriented social systems. Globally,
the number of women entrepreneurs lags behind the number of men. In the Philippines, though
women are playing a key role in society, still their entrepreneurial ability has not been properly
tapped due to the lower status of women in society. The main purpose of this paper was to find
out the entrepreneurial intentions and capabilities of women in a rural area. The researchers used
the quantitative research with survey questionnaire and a total of 150 women was targeted as
respondents of this study. Other relevant information was gathered through an online researches.
The adequate related literature and studies gave the researchers the proper direction on how the
investigation was done. Most of the women were aged 23 - 30, single or married, with at least
two children, and a baccalaureate degree holders. They managed their own businesses and
earning a monthly income of Php 10,001 to Php 20,000. The women entrepreneurs were good in
marketing (selling), record keeping, business management, critical thinking, planning and
training in written communication and managerial skills. The local government unit must
encourage more women to join seminars and training to improve their skills in the identified
areas, and community must promote and institutionalize the women's business activities to
increased and sustained economic development and growth. While this is particularly the case in
developing countries with significant poverty and high unemployment rates, it also relates to
growth as opposed to stagnating growth (Ambrish, 2014; Meyer, 2017; Meyer and Meyer, 2017).
significantly towards economic development, but face different constraints and opportunities
when compared to males. McAdam (2013) adds to this by indicating that female
entrepreneurship has drawn enormous attention to policy formulation, literature studies and
practical research since entrepreneurship of this type is recognised globally as contributing to the
growth of many countries’ economies. Furthermore, female entrepreneurial activity has been
accepted as a vital part of the economic profile of a country, as has the argument that
empowering female entrepreneurs act as fuel for flourishing economies (Ambrish, 2014; Kot et
al., 2016).Carter et al., (2006) assert that females are becoming essential change agents within
the social and economic environments and are globally responsible for making valuable
contributions towards job and wealth creation and economic growth. Notwithstanding the impact
and role females have in today’s economies, their contribution is often understated and
undervalued (Carter et al., 2006).Despite female enterprises being a growing phenomenon and
face tremendous challenges when it comes to the growth and expansion of their businesses. In
some cases, even starting a business can be a challenge for some females (Gatewood et al.,
2009). Over the decades, many different definitions explaining the terms entrepreneur and
entrepreneurship have been formulated. Schumpeter’s definition during the early 1930 considers
entrepreneurs to “be those who create new combinations, new markets, product, or distribution
systems” (De Bruin et al., 2006). More recent definitions by Shane (2003) and Ambrish (2014)
also refer to an entrepreneur as an individual who possesses the skill to exploit opportunities by
introducing new or better ways to provide goods and services to the economy, to enhance
methods and improve ways of organising and by establishing a new business or revitalising an
existing one by such means as improved service or product delivery. Historical and recent
definitions in the field of entrepreneurship include the following character words: opportunism,
innovation, risk-taking, designing new combinations of processes; while one of the principal
traits of entrepreneurship is ultimately starting new organisations (Bird and Brush, 2002).
Various definitions for female entrepreneurs have also been established in recent years. In the
UK and US, a female-owned business refers to one that is either fully or majority (51% or more)
owned by females. The Indian government defines a female entrepreneur as one owning at least
51 percent of a business and ensuring that at least 51 percent of employment provided by the
business should be to female employees (Ambrish, 2014). Based on the aforementioned, the
question could be posed: If the concept of entrepreneurship has been clearly defined by so many
researchers and experts in this field, why is it so important that continuous new research paths
and theoretical perspectives to understand the role women play within this sector require clearer
definition (De Bruin et al., 2007; Onyishi and Agbo, 2010).Since females have been formally
entering the sector of entrepreneurship during the last few decades, they can be considered as one
of the fastest growing entrepreneurial populations in the world (Brush and Cooper, 2012).
According to the OECD (2004) female entrepreneurship needs to be studied as a separate group
for two reasons. Firstly, it has been recognised as a valuable and unexploited source of economic
movement and growth that creates not just jobs for themselves, but for others as well. In
addition, females in some cases often provide society with alternative solutions to various social
problems. Secondly, the topic of female entrepreneurship has previously been neglected in social
sciences and in general society. However, this is slowly changing as more women are entering
into the market and policies assisting in the development and management of such
entrepreneurship are gradually becoming more prevalent in many countries. The World Bank
(2015) states that the empowerment of women is fundamental in achieving continued sustainable
development and that succeeding in this endeavour could enhance economic efficiency. Because
business and entrepreneurship are still perceived in many countries and cultures as a male
dominated sphere, it remains a priority to provide women with equal access to opportunities and
continuous research on female entrepreneurship could assist in doing so. Bird and Brush (2002)
and De Bruin et al., (2006) suggest that historical theory and research on entrepreneurship
focussed on men and that the perception was created that entrepreneurship is formed around
dominated field have been made in the past. In 1921, a reference was made to the “active
who perceives the gaps and connects markets” (Bird and Brush, 2002) whereas, in 1982 Hebert
and Link referred to an entrepreneur as the “key man”. It makes sense that the literature and
theory was viewed from a male perspective in the past, because for many years females were not
active in the business and economic sector. But as times have changed and women are entering
this previously male dominated industry, the need for new and female-relevant research is
growing (Heber and Link, 1982). Leading researchers in the field of female entrepreneurship
have emphasised the importance of studying this as a separate research entity as there are
significant differences between male and female motivations, characteristics and business growth
and development with regard to entrepreneurship. There are also clear distinguishing features in
some of the methods and ways that female entrepreneurs manage their businesses and compile
strategies(Bird and Brush, 2002; Greene et al., 2003; Brush et al., 2006; Carter et al., 2006;
Meyer and Mostert, 2016). Carter et al., (2006) specifically refer to women being more risk and
debt averse, which could lead to certain conclusions about why their businesses are in many
cases not attracting the investment opportunities that their male counterparts so often do. In
addition, Botha et al., (2007) suggest that some women might need more assistance with regard
to self-esteem and confidence than traditional male entrepreneurs. Barsh and Yee (2011) further
contend that women face different structural obstacles, lifestyle issues and individually
embedded mind-sets when compared to men. While there is proof that similarities between
certain entrepreneurial traits in men and women exist, there are clear differences in many other
aspects. Greene et al., (2003) report that over the last 25 years various research have identified
similarities between male and female entrepreneurs, but that these investigations lack substantial
discussion of the differences. Some of the most compelling differences between male and female
their start-ups, governance structures, growth patterns and some aspects of the entrepreneurial
process. Various differences are present in the traditional way in which entrepreneurship is
process: time, concept of reality, action and interaction, ethics and power are all often performed
in a different and more subtle manner when viewed from a female perspective. In addition to
this, Bird and Brush (2002) further explain that there are clear differences in the way that
traditional and new ventures and organisations are started and the way that they would be
managed from a female perspective. For example, the way a traditional entrepreneur might make
use of resources would be to “lease” people, show low commitment and be a promoter, whereas
a female entrepreneur might take a different approach by committing to people and taking the
form of a trustee. There are also differences in the structure, method of controlling of systems,
culture and policy integration. McAdam (2013) asserts that there are many similarities in the
operating profile of small businesses despite the varying traits of the owners, but that there is
indeed a significant difference within the operating profiles of female owners. Many still follow
a feminised working pattern, trying to balance work, home and childcare. While some might say
this pattern is acceptable, many may see it as discrediting the value and growth potential of the
business (McAdam, 2013). This need for supplementary research on female entrepreneurship
further extends to developing and emerging countries where culture still plays a huge role in the
development and empowerment of women. Many cultures still believe that women are solely
responsible for home and family related tasks as well as purposes of reproduction (De Bruin et
al., 2006; Karanja and Bwisa, 2013). This could restrict women from starting a business or
hinder their growth potential owing to their status within the community. Many African cultures
everything they own actually belongs to their husbands, creating structural and cultural
challenges for female entrepreneurs (Chitsike, 2000; Mungai and Ogot, 2012). According to the
Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) women tend to lack confidence compared to their male
equals when it comes to business matters, despite their origin, education level, work status and so
forth (Herrington et al., 2009). Research has also consistently confirmed that early-stage
entrepreneurial activity (TEA) is gender sensitive due to societal, cultural and economic issues
(Singer et al., 2015).Furthermore, perceptions that women are less capable than males in the field
of business, are still widely held by many cultures; even by some westernised economies.
McAdam (2013) asserts that females are a diverse group and that deeper studies into culture,
ethnicity, class and education are also important and could indeed influence the way women
perceive business ownership and manage their ventures. As research in many cases have a direct
and indirect link to management policies and improvements in strategies, having more high
Due to the increased participation and growth in numbers of women business owners,
many would agree that more, and a better body of research is needed in the area of female
entrepreneurship. One of the discussions by experts in the literature concerns the gap in research
into female entrepreneurship. Despite more studies in this area being undertaken over the past
few decades, there is still a gap in the available literature. From the studies on female
entrepreneurship, one may note that many of them focus on investigating individual level and/or
country or regional profiles. Few studies pursue general research on entrepreneurship that
involves analysis at firm level and integrated-level (De Bruin et al., 2007). It has also been
suggested that cross-country studies will be desirable in future. In addition to this, comparisons
rural African community display the same entrepreneurial characteristics as women from a
sophisticated first world country? Greene et al., (2003) furthermore suggest that additional
research is required on the role of human capital, strategic choices and structural barriers in
female entrepreneurship. A report issued by the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) in
South Africa indicated that there is a major absence of high quality empirical studies on female
entrepreneurs and that statistical data is lacking (Jiyane et al., 2012). Brush and Cooper (2012)
further assert that female entrepreneurship is understudied and not well-documented. De Bruin et
al. (2006) scrutinised the number of publications placed in the top eight entrepreneurship
journals between 1994 and 2006 and found that a mere six to seven percent related to female
entrepreneurship. In addition to this, Greene et al.,(2003) prepared a similar study on nine of the
leading entrepreneurial journals from 1976 to 2001 and found that in 661 issues published during
that time, a mere 129 articles concentrated on women entrepreneurship or business development.
Adding to this is the fact that most of these publications appeared after 1990 and that just 7
percent of these articles used a conceptual approach or were based on literature reviews. Ahl
(2002) found that some of the so-called “A-journals” in the field of management did not publish
noticeably on entrepreneurship and even if they did, there was almost nothing on female
entrepreneurship. She found that of seven of the leading American based management journals
Administrative Science Quarterly) between the years 1985 and 1999 just 97 articles out of 5291
were entrepreneurship related and of these, just three reported on female entrepreneurship. This
equals a mere 0.056 percent of all articles from these journals. She conducted a similar search in
journal) until 2002 and found just 12 research articles that were on the topic of entrepreneurship
entrepreneur emerged in the 1930s. The late 1970s witnessed the emergence of an explicit sub-
domain of women entrepreneurship (Jennings and Brush, 2013). This section outlines the
In 1976, Schwartz published the first academic paper on female entrepreneurship in the Journal
of Contemporary Business and the first policy report in this area titled “The bottom line:
Unequal enterprise in America” was released in 1979 in Washington DC. Hisrich and O’Brien
(1981) made the first academic conference presentation on women entrepreneurs at the Babson
Initial research on entrepreneurship assumed that male and female entrepreneurs were
generally the same and there was no specific need for a separate investigation (Bruni et al. 2004).
As a result, the sub-domain of women entrepreneurship did not develop as a significant area until
the late 1990s to early 2000s (Jennings and Brush, 2013) with the launch of two dedicated
conferences. First, a policy oriented Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
(OECD) Conference on women entrepreneurs in small and medium sized enterprises was held in
area recognized the growing need for research in this area. The journal of Entrepreneurship
Theory and Practice published a special issue on women entrepreneurship in 2006 and 2007 (de
Bruin et al. 2006) and then again in 2012 (Hughes et al., 2012).
special report on women and entrepreneurship in 2006 followed by subsequent reports in 2010,
2012 and 2015. In 2015, Global Entrepreneurship Development Institute published the Female
Entrepreneurship Index report that analyzed conditions for fostering women entrepreneurship in
77 countries. As per the report, the top ten countries for female entrepreneurs in 2015 were-
United States, Australia, United Kingdom, Denmark, Netherlands, France, Iceland, Sweden,
In recent years, the debate about the marginality of women in academic science has
been extended to academics’ engagement with industry and their commercial efforts (Tartari
driver of economic growth and job creation. Indeed, an estimated $4.5 trillion would be added to
Asia and the Pacific’s gross domestic product by 2025 by closing the gender disparities in
advancing women’s rights and increasing their influence (The Asia Foundation, 2018). Women
form a nation’s significant human resource (Pierce, Achdiawan, & Roshetko, 2016; Tartari &
Salter, 2015). They should be sued as instruments for the growth and development of the
economy as well as to their community. Women, on the other hand, are willing to take up
business and enter all professions like trade, industry, engineering, etc. (The Asia Foundation,
2018; Pedro, 1942; Pierce et al., 2016) The role and participation of women are recognized and
steps are being taken for the promotion of women entrepreneurship, women must be shaped up
properly with other entrepreneurial traits and skills to face the challenges of world markets,
meet the changes in the trends, be competent enough to sustain and strive for excellence in
the entrepreneurial field (Bumatay, Sulabo, & Ragus, 2008; Fini, Marzocchi, & Sobrero,
by the participation of women and therefore the growth and development of women
development services are the major requirements for industrials growth, especially contribute
to the growth of every woman. Entrepreneurial skills are essential for industrialization and for
the alleviation of mass unemployment and poverty. Today, women in advanced market
economics own more than 25 percent of all businesses and women-owned businesses in
Africa, Asia, Eastern Europe, and Latin America are growing rapidly. In some regions of the
world, the transformation of the market economy, women entrepreneurs is a growing trend. A
ownership not only confers control over assets and liabilities but also gives her the freedom to
make decisions. Through entrepreneurship development a woman will not only generate income
for other women in the locality, but also will have a multiplier effect in the generation of
income and poverty alleviation (Emm, Ks, Gomolemo, & Oa, 2017; García-rodríguez & Gil-
soto, 2017; Junior, Antonio, Gimenez, & Wendling, 2018; Mamun, Binti, Nawi, Farhah, &
because ownership not only confers control over assets and liabilities but also gives her the
the skills for their own self-development (I. Ismail, Husin, Abdul, Mohd, & Che, 2016;
Jovane, Seliger, & Stock, 2017; Wickstrøm, Liu, & Schøtt, 2017). Empowering women is a
but also help to develop economic independence, personal and social capabilities among
rights, political representation, social equality, personal right, family development, market
development, community development and at least the nation development (D. Ismail, Khairy,
& Domil, 2014; Schneider, 2017; Suzana et al., 2014). Entrepreneurship development among
Human resources and technology are the two important factors of growth in the new economic
order. To activate these two factors require entrepreneurship development in a big way in an
correlated variables in various research studies conducted in different nations. The growth of
developing economies may be attributed to a large extent to the growth of their entrepreneurship.
Further, the growth of women entrepreneurship has been relatively high in developing nations
Fella, 2017; Rachwa, 2011; Sánchez & Sahuquillo, 2012; Stephany, Fontinele, Maria, Barros,
274 million women were already running their own businesses across 74 economies, of which
down the barriers that limited businesses by cultures, gender and geography, many partnership
and trade agreements have been developed in an attempt to encourage global economic activity
among women. Women are known to give back about 90 percent of their earnings to the health
and education of their communities and families, contributing to development directly, so it’s
easy to see why it is critical. Understanding women’s entrepreneurial attitudes, trends and
activity from all over the globe will help shape government policies at various levels along with
the numerous educational and training programs aimed at improving the business environment
for women.
Here are some interesting findings -- and paradoxes -- from the GEM Women report:
1. Developing economies see a higher male-female parity among entrepreneurs than developed
economies.
Asia and Latin America showed the highest parity between male and female entrepreneurs,
at the innovation-driven stage of development saw women start businesses at 60 percent the rate
of men -- a surprisingly sharp decline from factor-driven economies. Despite the advantage of
entrepreneurship.
venturing into business even in factor-driven economies. This only becomes more pronounced in
the innovation-driven group, where women are three and a half times more likely to cite
The increased opportunity perception is associated with the higher TEA. Also, the report shows
that women entrepreneurs have a 5 percent greater likelihood of innovativeness than men across
all 74 economies.
Related: Danica Patrick Spent Years Preparing to Retire -- by Laying the Groundwork for a New
Career
Though the number of women who aspire to start their businesses is closer to the number of men,
the gap widens among business-owners, indicating that women are less likely to start their
business and also more likely to exit at early stages or between phases of transition (4 out of 10
Business discontinuance among women is associated with lower growth expectations and
dealing with their expected roles as primary caregivers for their families.
In the developed economies, more than half of women-led businesses are seen to be clustered
around government, health, education and social services. The report shows that women are
While developing countries showed higher entrepreneurial activity, fewer enterprises were likely
to transition to a mature stage. Innovation-driven economies were seen to be more conducive for
sustainable businesses but registered slower growth than men-owned businesses. Interestingly,
women in innovation-driven economies displayed a less favorable view of their own capabilities
Laurel Delaney, founder of Women Entrepreneurs Grow Global and author of the bestselling
book “Exporting: The Definitive Guide to Selling Abroad Profitably,” says “Even in a developed
economy, women business owners are less likely to explore and expand their products or
services because they think they can’t do it, or that they don’t have access to the right training,
education, advisory networks, mentorships and community programs. This perceived deficiency
makes it difficult for women to access markets, conduct marketing and establish relationships.”
Related: A Day in the Life of Jen Gotch, the Female Badass Behind the Multimillion-Dollar
Company Ban.do
suggesting that general education is less relevant for building entrepreneurial skills or
competencies.
This fact is demonstrated by the emergence of entrepreneurial activities in the most unexpected
of places. A refugee camp in South Sudan was found to be flourishing with micro-enterprises
and small businesses, mostly led by women. Technology, the massive game changer is crushing
barriers between geographies and cultures, and unifying businesses with the perfect customer to
“A global mindset starts with self-awareness, reflects an authentic openness to and engagement
with the world, and employs a heightened awareness to the sensitivity of cross-cultural
especially starting a firm. This begs the question, what explains entrepreneurial intention?
People’s intentions have been considered consequences of their personal traits, demographic
background, cognitive make-up, and their context. Here we combine these approaches into a
two-level model to account for how intention is shaped by individual and cultural conditions
around the world. We hypothesize that intention is promoted by perceived capabilities, risk
propensity and awareness of opportunities, and that these are affected by demographic attributes,
especially formal education and entrepreneurial training, and by cultural context. We use the
GEM adult population survey in 2008 in all the 34 nations where people were asked about their
entrepreneurial training. We also use the World Values Survey in which national culture is
measured along two major dimensions, traditionality versus secular-rationalism and materialism
versus self-expressionism. The hypotheses are tested by regressions. We find that people’s
demographics, notable gender in the way that men more often than women consider themselves
capable, risk-willing and aware of opportunities. People’s entrepreneurial attitude is also shaped
by their cultural context in the way that traditionality, more than secular-rationalistic culture,
promotes perceived capabilities, and also in the way that self-expressionism, more than
Social psychology offers strong models of behavioural intentions with significant demonstrated
predictive value for several behaviours. Such models offer sound hypothetical structures that
particularly delineate the procedures underlying intentional acts. Metaexaminations (Kim &
Hunter, 1993) empirically demonstrate that “Intentions effectively predict behaviour and attitude
(states of mind) effectively predicts intentions.” Over an extensive variety of studies identifying
a wide range of behaviours and intentions to take part in those behaviour’s, attitudes explain
more than half of the changes in intentions. Intentions clarify at least 30% of the changes in
behaviour. Clarifying 30% of the difference in behaviour analyses positively to the 10% level
and is ordinarily clarified straightforwardly by quality measures or attitudes (Ajzen, 1987). More
distal marvels, for example, profession decisions will probably bring about a smaller effect. Still,
intentions remain a huge, unbiased indicator of career choice (Lent et al., 1994).
The theory of reasoned action (TRA) (Fishbein & Ajzen, 1975; Ajzen & Fishbein, 1980)
generally asserts that “The central cause of an action/behaviour is the intention, more specifically
behavioural intention, that is, what one anticipates doing or not doing.” The intention, on the
other hand, is dictated by attitude (evaluation of the action/behaviour) and a subjective norm
(evaluation of other available options) (Trafimow, 2009). TRA is comprised of three noteworthy
dispositions (attitudes). The more grounded the inspirational dispositions toward conduct are and
the more grounded the social standards toward conduct are, the more grounded the intention is.
Behavioural Intentions measures the quality of the intention to execute a predefined activity.
Subjective standards depict the weight by associates or companions to conform to standards. If,
individual will be more averse to entrepreneurial conduct. Attitudes comprise the assumptions
about the outcomes of performing a predefined activity. Behavioural beliefs are assumed to be a
beliefs on the other hand impact one’s subjective norm towards performing an action/behaviour
(Madden et al., 1992). In summary, according to the theory of reasoned action, the immediate
precursor of behaviour is intention which is a function of information and beliefs (Madden et al.,
1992).
The TPB (Ajzen, 1985) extends the limit of unadulterated volitional control indicated by the
TRA. This is accomplished by including convictions with respect to the ownership of essential
assets and opportunities to proceed with a given conduct. The more assets and opportunities
people think they have, the more prominent their apparent behavioural control over their conduct
conceivable to isolate these convictions and regard them as halfway autonomous determinants of
applications and fundamental research. Such reliable, vigorous and replicable ideal models have
predecessors of expectation. Two mirror the apparent attractive quality of playing out behaviour:
individual attitude toward results of the behaviour and perceived social standards/norms. The
third, perceived behavioural control reflects observations that the behaviour is individually
controllable. Perceived behavioural control reflects the apparent feasibility of playing out
Shapero’s model of the Entrepreneurial Event (SEE) is another important theory in the
entrepreneurship intentions world. It has been referred to as an implicit intention model specific
to the entrepreneurship domain (Krueger et al., 2000). In this model, the intention to venture into
business is said to be derived from the propensity to act upon opportunities, perceptions of its
attractiveness and lastly, likelihood of its success (Krueger et al., 2000). The model assumes that
“human behaviour is guided by inertia until an outside force interrupts that inertia.” The
interruption is most often negative such as an abrupt job termination; however, sometimes the
interruption of the inertia can be due to positive events such winning a lottery (Shapero & Sokol,
1982). The interruptions trigger a change in behaviour and the victim is always forced to make
decisions that seek the best opportunity available. (Krueger et al., 2000) According to Shapero,
behaviour depends on credibility and propensity to act. Credibility demands behaviour to be both
feasible and desirable. Thus, entrepreneurial events require both in order for the desired
as a result of cultural, social and personal factors further, Shapero defines perceived desirability
as the attractiveness of starting a business, i.e., both intra and extra personal impacts and defines
perceived feasibility as the level to which one feels capable of venturing into the
inventory questions that aim at various aspects of perceived feasibility and desirability.
“People act on decisions based on their own personal disposition and thus reflect the aspects of
According to Ajzen, the interpretation of a behaviour is the set of the attitude towards it (i.e.
perceived feasibility) and perceived behavioural control (i.e., control beliefs or self-efficacy).
The attitude towards a certain behaviour is the degree to which an individual assesses a certain
behaviour or action to be beneficial and useful; thus, it indicates the personal favourable or
unfavourable evaluation of the intention to become an entrepreneur. The social norm is the social
pressure that considers people’s opinions of the proposed behaviour. It depends on the
expectation of aid from other important people, such as parents in the case of young
entrepreneurs. The perceived behavioural control represents the propensity to act and the
situational capabilities (i.e., self-efficacy). In our case, this predictor refers to students’
perception of the ease or difficulty of performing the entrepreneurial behaviour, and it is assumed
to reflect past experiences as well as anticipated impediments and obstacles. Ajzen clarified that
the exact nature of these relationships remains uncertain and is still an empirical issue, as there is
a general adherence to the particular context of reference. In this study, we focused on the
prediction of entrepreneurial intentions rather than on its realisation because the increasing
flexibility of jobs has led to increasing uncertainty of permanent work. Hence, given that the
Studies on Women Entrepreneurial Intentions Women would also like to try the way of
entrepreneurship. Indeed, the number of “pink” businesses increased in the last years. However,
many studies have found that males have a higher preference for entrepreneurship behaviour
than females. This preference is not due to a greater capacity of one compared to the other but
rather to the difficulties that women often meet, for example, in obtaining a bank loan because
women are perceived as less creditable than men. Different studies, however, analyse the
determinants of entrepreneurial intention according to the gender of people interviewed, but final
results are still mixed. Kolvereid (1996) found that males have a significantly higher preference
for self-employment than females. The author concluded that gender influences self-employment
intentions indirectly through their effect on attitude, subjective norm and perceived behavioural
control. Similarly, Veciana et al. investigated the attitude, social norms and perceived
behavioural control for entrepreneurship according to students’ gender in Spain and Puerto Rico
and concluded that, although the female students interviewed had a favourable perception of the
attitude towards entrepreneurship, their perceived social pressures were not positive and their
intentions were relatively low. It might seem obvious that women could have a high
entrepreneurial intention because governments often develop policies and special programs
addressed to them to encourage innovation and business development; however, despite these
facilities, women often find barriers in their entrepreneurial activity. Indeed, Davidsson (2003)
concluded that gender has little or no direct influence on entrepreneurial intentions. In contrast to
the aforementioned studies, Hackett et al. found that gender differences are mediated by changes
reveals that gender, family business experience and education level are significant factors in
in Italy)
also strengthens their motives to pursue entrepreneurship, and are willing to be more risky
toward achieving them. This is not the case by PBC, suggesting their push toward certain
consistent whether there are or not necessity-related responses controlled for, suggesting
necessity, risk taking and an intrinsic motives toward entrepreneurship may be intertwined. A
serial mediation effect from motives and risk propensity between skill and intention is
Males PBC of entrepreneurial endeavors does not increase intentions because is strengthens their
increases their intentions as an effect of becoming riskier either. This effect is not consistent
when there are necessity-related responses controlled for. When they are, neither their motives,
nor their willingness to take risk, become impactful in any way whatsoever toward
entrepreneurial intentions, nor mediate any effect, suggesting they are better driven in our sample
by job security.
propensity to take risks, which also significantly impacts their intentions for business. This same
statement applies for their motives to pursue entrepreneurship. This means both beliefs get
pushed by perceiving highly their abilities. Langowitz and Minniti (2007) also found a relation
between skill and intention in female students, and others, like Kickul et al. (2008) did with high
school students. We further strengthen and boost on these findings by including these indirect
effects. Unexpectedly, this is not what we found for males, neither by skills or PBC. It is worth
noting that their answers for risk taking propensity are not significantly different from females,
Risk taking propensity as an entrepreneur trait has been previously questioned (Brockhaus,
1980), and have found its usefulness as phase-specific (i.e., only for intentions; Zhao et al.,
2010). These results indicate some significant relationship (and only in one group), although, like
some of them would argue, it does not hint as an entrepreneur trait neither. Risk taking behavior
varies according to its context, regardless if people rate themselves as high risk takers (Nicholson
et al., 2005).
It’s not very likely that this case points to excitement for novelty or sensation-seeking for
riskiness, as it’s sometimes attributed to entrepreneurs [which has also been linked to biological
responses related to certain risk-taking behaviors, but usually involving danger (Zald et al.,
2008), which we seriously question it’s the entrepreneur case]. In fact, people in Spain rank
higher than their European neighbors in fear of failure (Peña et al., 2019), and has been
expressed as a reason for not being entrepreneurs, more so by females (Sánchez Cañizares and
The relation would likely sum up to whether people dare to stand up and take risks as a
composite of, both, an adaptive response to high uncertainty in the country, such as that given by
unemployment, and a personal likeability for business. Unlike males, necessity responses do not
dampen any path on females. What was found with the female sample is that the effect of skill,
combined with an increase of personal motives and risk propensity to intentions is present
regardless of the effects of necessity, suggesting they generally become riskier toward venture
creation to avoid unemployment, while finding achievable personal goals through it (which also
gets impacted by the prospects of job security). In other words, because they want it and because
they could use it to evade uncertainty. For the male sample, this does not seem to be the case,
and works dichotomously: being driven by necessity factors, but not for personal goals or
second option or failsafe, which may explain the non-significant relationship of risk-taking with
intentions.
Results also show females have stronger motives for entrepreneurship than males, which could
be due to some reasons. The first instinctual explanation would be because it’s an artifact defect,
as the variable lacks some items that have been found of importance to males, such as economic
ambition or the inherent challenge of what implies creating a business (Maes et al., 2014). In
other words, the variable slightly favors females. While this may be valid argument, however, it
is also linear thinking to fit results to an assumption: that males are always supposed to find it
more attractive, which can be a defect in reasoning. The item composition of this variable shows
females actually responded higher in all four of its items, and the difference in their mean is
novelty, and a feel of personal achievement as goals through entrepreneurship slightly higher
than males, and these impact their intentions, but not in males.
We believe this is partly due to field demographics. Males and females distribute among
different business sectors (Klapper and Parker, 2011), the latter more prone to create small,
single handed business (Coleman, 2007), which is the most common type in Spain (Peña et al.,
2019). Second, more than half of the female participants are education or social-related (i.e.,
These results are logically reasoned if they their motives to pursue entrepreneurship are higher,
and means there are likely some sectors where females are looking for entrepreneurship because
it fills them as individuals more than in males. Irrelevant of the size of the difference, this is
where they feel that they have a competitiveness with male entrepreneurs and produce
competitive products in the market, it will cause a strong intention to behave entrepreneurship.
The study also show that government support has no direct influence on the perceived
behavioural control but influence on competitive environment. Based on the research, the
Entrepreneurship training conducted by the government still does not reach the rural areas, so
many women entrepreneurs are lack managerial knowledge. To enhance the intention of women
entrepreneurs, the government must have an active role in facilitating women. Coaching and
mentoring programs are an effective way to enhance the women entrepreneurial intentions,
especially in rural areas. Therefore, the promotion of women's entrepreneurship as social choice
(https://www.globalilluminators.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/327.pdf)
entrepreneurship. In recent years, female entrepreneurship has been increasingly popular and it
plays a more and more important role in economic development (Verheul, Thurik, and Grilo,
2006), contributing to job creation and social wealth, as well as the diversity of entrepreneurship
(Langowitz and Minniti, 2007). However, the rate of women entrepreneurship still falls far
behind that of men. Women business ownership only accounts for about half of that for men
(Fairlieand Robb, 2009) and the lower rate of women entrepreneurship has been found in
different countries, such as Canada, US, Portugal, and UK (OECD, 2008). Although the increase
in entrepreneurship rate, males seem to dominate the entrepreneurship world. The disparity
between females and males regarding their entrepreneurial career interests and attitudes has
provoked loads of study on the effect of gender on entrepreneurship. For example, researchers
found that several factors influence the participation of male and female entrepreneurs, including
financial support, risk-taking propensity (Verheul, Thurik, and Grilo, 2006), alertness to existing
opportunities (Langowitz and Minnitti, 2007), and internal control (Wilson, Kickul, and Marlino,
2007).Some researchers believed that the divide between men and women is determined by their
gender stereotypes which impact people’s cognition and behavior (Gupta et al., 2005).
pursue an entrepreneurial career (Johnson, Stone, and Philips, 2008; Langowitz and Minnitti,
2007; Petridou, Sarri, and Kyrgidou, 2009). To encourage entrepreneurship for both females and
crucial to fostering the entrepreneurial intention that predicts entrepreneurial behavior (Dickson,
Solomon, and Weaver, 2008; Dutta, Li, and Merenda, 2010; Souitaris, Zerbinati, and Al-Laham,
2007). These studies, however, did not investigate the effect of entrepreneurship education by
gender, i.e., what are the differences between male and female students being exposed to
impact on entrepreneurial attitudes and intentions of females and males? As the perception of
females and males about entrepreneurship are different (Gupta et al., 2005), the influence of
The interaction between gender and entrepreneurial intent as it relates to Communal Tendency,
in which women with intent to become entrepreneurs endorsed more communal tendencies than
conceptualized as an individualistic, masculine endeavor, much research has shown that women
entrepreneurs often endorse motivations that are inconsistent with that model of entrepreneurship
(Allen & Curington, 2014; Kirkwood, 2009). Our finding highlights that women may already
personality could encourage more women to start their own businesses and expand the field in
general.
Studies have shown that gendered stereotypes about entrepreneurship have a profound effect on
intention to become an entrepreneur. Women are more likely to see feminine traits more
consistent with entrepreneurship than men (Gupta, Turban, Wasti, & Sikdar, 2009). In addition,
stereotypes may play a role in gender differences in entrepreneurship through stereotype threat
associate femininity with poor performance in a particular domain may do less well on relevant
tasks when subtly reminded of gender. This process may deter women’s entry into
entrepreneurship to the extent that entrepreneurship and the related tasks are perceived as “male”
(Farrington, 2012). Beliefs about one’s own personality could influence performance in
entrepreneurship contexts, which could in turn confirm those beliefs. Accordingly, we see
implications. If those who support entrepreneurship, such as venture capitalists and investors,
female entry into entrepreneurship. For example, our finding that Communal Tendency is
elevated among women who want to become entrepreneurs highlights a pro-social trait that may
have specific benefits in building social capital. As others have suggested (Díaz-García &
Jiménez-Moreno, 2010), if research and policy can increase the visibility and desirability of
women’s strengths in entrepreneurship, the field may be able to increase women’s perception
that entry into entrepreneurship is consistent with core elements of their gender identity.
alternative forms of entrepreneurship that may have gone unnoticed in favor of more traditional
Past research has shown that business education can increase entrepreneurial motivation, which
can in turn increase entry into entrepreneurship (Krueger, Reilly, & Carsrud, 2000, Petridou,
typed language and images (Hentschel, Horvath, Peus, & Sczesny, 2018). A worthwhile locus
for intervention into the gender disparity in entrepreneurship would be providing space and
entrepreneurship. Primary, secondary, and business schools and workplaces could utilize the
Not all of the hypotheses were confirmed, but on the basis of them we can say that there is one
undisputed conclusion – Polish high school students’ entrepreneurial intentions don not differ
significantly because of gender. The reason for this statement was the result of the regression
analysis. That analysis shows that there is no significant influence of gender on entrepreneurial
intention and that the same factor affects entrepreneurial intention in males as well as in female’s
cases. That results show how the attitude of Polish young women to entrepreneurial activity in
next few years can change. Nowadays they are more women who are self-confident and ready to
take risk. It can be also confirmed by the level of masculinity of Polish society, which has score
of 64 on Hofstede’s cultural dimension scale. Women’s entrepreneurship can also be the effect
of the situation on the Polish labour market. The period of time when young people after
graduation look for a job which equals their aspirations and level of education lasts often a year
or more. This situation motivates them to look for alternative solutions. In the case of women
this motivation can be higher because of maternity leave. Working in their own company can
guarantee them a stability of workplace and elastic work hours. What can be interesting is the
fact that the attitude toward behaviour is the factor which does not influence young Poles’
should look for answers to the following questions: why does this factor not have any significant
(http://soep.ue.poznan.pl/jdownloads/Wszystkie%20numery/Rok%202016/02_pawlak.pdf)
Figure 1 shows the conceptual framework on which the researcher is guided to conduct this
study. The input box contains the variables which are needed to be collected. The process box
contains the methods on how inputs could be collected analysed through the use of survey
questionnaires which will be answered by the respondents and on how the data collected could
find out the entrepreneurial intentions and capabilities of women in a rural area specifically in
The researcher aims to identify the entrepreneurial intentions and capabilities of women in a
rural area. Through this research, specifically it will answer the following:
What are the entrepreneurial intentions of woman in rural area for carrying out a new
business?
Method of research is mainly focus in discovering or exploring new knowledge that could
widened up an individual understanding about the chosen topic or study. Thus, it intends to
identify the entrepreneurial intentions and capabilities of women in a rural area. For instance,
studying or identifying the entrepreneurial intentions and capabilities of women can help all the
aspiring woman entrepreneur to do their best to build a new business and it will give them more
clear perspective on how their capabilities affect their entrepreneurial intentions. It will also
benefit and help the future researcher as their guide for having deeper understanding or
The research is all about the entrepreneurial intentions and capabilities of woman in rural area.
This study will focus only to the entrepreneurial intentions and capabilities of woman and it will
be conducted through the help of the perception of some woman entrepreneur in San Luis,
Pampanga.
enterprising.
of the risks and enjoying most of the rewards. The entrepreneur is commonly seen as an
Intentions- An intention is idea that you plan (or intend) to carry out.
The researcher utilize the descriptive quantitative design of the study in order to identify
the entrepreneurial intentions and capabilities of woman in rural area. The method is design for
The respondents of the study were the woman entrepreneur of San Luis Pampanga. These
woman will be the research subjects since they’ve already have an existing business in San Luis
area. Personal data such as names and addresses of the woman entrepreneur of San Luis are
The researcher will use survey questionnaire answer by the respondents. Survey
questionnaires are used in order for the researcher to identify the intentions and capabilities of
woman entrepreneur.
The researcher will provide questionnaire to the respondents. The floated questionnaire
will check by the researcher and the data gathered will tally to get the majority responses made
by the participants of the study. The results will then discuss and recommendations will be made.
Ethical aspects of research must be followed in this research. To ensure privacy of data,
confidentially of the responses will be maintain. The researcher have reference and also asked
permission to conduct an interview or survey. The researcher put citation on the secondary data
The basis of the data gather by the researcher on this research are the survey
questionnaire answers by the woman entrepreneur of San Luis. The data gather will be treated
through frequency method and ranking through the use of mean rating.