Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Graduate Programs
Final exam of Corporate Governance
Personal Information:
1
General instruction:
Here below seven (7) discussion questions are provided. You are supposed to discuss on
them.
Attempt all questions in accordance with the instructions
All questions carry the equal weights/marks
Please try to be to the point. Overwriting has no value.
Clear handwriting is rewarded otherwise you will assume the risk thereof
2
Questions:
Because there are so many interested parties, it’s inefficient to allow them to control the
company directly. Instead, the corporation operates under a system of regulations that allow
stakeholders to have a voice in the corporation commensurate with their stake, yet allow the
corporation to continue operating in an efficient manner. Corporate governance also takes into
3
account audit procedures in order to monitor outcomes and how closely they adhere to goals, and
to motivate the organization as a whole to work toward corporate goals. By using corporate
governance procedures wisely and sharing results, a corporation can motivate all stakeholders to
work toward the corporation’s goals by demonstrating the benefits, to stakeholders, of the
corporation’s success.
2. Institution building for a market economy In a market economy, private corporations raise
funds from investors and, combining these funds with other inputs labour and land, conduct
business. Their objective is simple to seek profits. The role and superior performance of private
sector corporations in economic growth so to develop an efficient and competitive corporate
organzetio,
3. Promotion of foreign investment development and transition economies need to raise funds
from foreign countries. On other also to collect finacies by selling of shares to solve financial
4
problems and to establish the new company .The establishment of proper corporate
governance has become increasingly important in this context, The capital markets good for
develop capitals incountries.
The shareholder owns part of a public company through shares of stock, while a stakeholder has
an interest in the performance of a company for reasons other than stock performance or
appreciation. They are dependent on the company for their jobs, salaries, work experience,
training, and career prospects and so on. The general public may be significant stakeholders for
a large company because the company may have an impact on the economy as a whole, and on
the environment.
The company been better managed and more successful commercially .From a business case
perspective, improving relation with socity improves corporate reputation among stakeholders
of the company. By improving reputation and stakeholder relations, the company is likely to
perform better over the medium to long-term. Some institutional investors like Aden water
5
companies are required to take socially responsible investment into consideration when making
investment decisions. There is a stronger probability of support from the investment community
for a company with good CSR policies.
Paying attention to stakeholder is important in terms of risk management. Such risks can
destroy reputation and impact on share value. A company business might benefit from the trust
between suppliers and customers that comes from ethical dealing. The corporate should
recognize the rights of stakeholders that to encourage active co-operation between corporations
and stakeholders in creating wealth jobs and the sustainability of financially sound enterprises.
5. Are the same corporate governance practice and rule applied to all
companies and countries? Use real world cases you are familiar with
and theories to explain your arguments.
6
economic performance. For example, ownership by other firms, cross shareholding, and
pyramiding can influence the behaviour of firms in product markets.
7
Gender diversity is part of the broader concept of board diversity. Boards are concerned with
having right composition to provide diverse perspectives. Greater female representation on
boards provides some additional skills and perspectives that may not be possible with all-
male boards Board diversity promotes more effective monitoring and problem- solving.
Gender diversity in the boards is supported by different theoretical perspectives.
Representation from diverse groups will provide a balanced board so that no individual or
group of individuals can dominate the decision- making of the board However, many
scholars now believe that an increase in board diversity leads to better boards and governance
on the ground that diversity allows boards to tap on broader talent pools for the role of
directors
Educational qualification
Director's educational qualifications are central to effectively interpret and utilize the
information generated by the management of particular types of business enterprise.
Educational qualification affects the oversight and monitoring role of boards of directors
Board of directors is vested with the responsibility of ensuring that the shareholders’ money
is not wasted, shareholders have a serious interest in ensuring that the board is staffed with
well educated and experienced directors The human capital provided by its board of directors
is vital given the corporate board is one of the mechanisms for oveseeing the firm and it can
arguably provide the knowledge needed to function in the new environment. Personal profile
factors of directors such as education and experience is important for board efficiency.
8
Appointing directors with related and relevant skills and knowledge to perform task specific
duties such as the firm's internal control and procedures will enhance the quality of
information gathered and the solution to problems and of the views held and judgments made
during the decision-making process In other words, their knowledge of the industry, its
opportunities and threats and their connections to the industry participants based on their
experience enables them to contribute substantively in the firm performance.
Contemporary CG started in 1992 with the Cadbury report in the UK. Cadbury was the result
of several high profile company collapses. is concerned primarily with protecting weak and
widely dispersed shareholders against self-interested Directors and managers.
The Cadbury Code of Best practices had 19 recommendations. The recommendations are in the
nature of guidelines relating to Board of Directors, Non-executive Directors, Executive Directors
and those on Reporting and Control.
Relating to the Board of Directors these are:
The Board should meet regularly retain full and effective control over the company and
monitor the executive management
There should be a clearly accepted division of responsibilities at the head of a company,
which will ensure balance of power and authority, such that no individual has unfettered
powers of decision. In companies where the Chairman is also the Chief Executive, it is
essential that there should be a strong and independent element on the Board, with a
recognized senior member.
The Board should include non-executive Directors of sufficient caliber and number for
their views to carry significant weight in the Board’s decisions.
·The Board should have a formal schedule of matters specifically reserved to it for
decisions to ensure that the direction and control of the company is firmly in its hands.
There should be an agreed procedure for Directors in the furtherance of their duties to
take independent professional advice if necessary, at the company’s expense.
9
All directors should have access to the advice and services of the Company Secretary,
who is responsible to the Board for ensuring that Board procedures are followed and that
applicable rules and regulations are complied with. Any question of the removal of
Company Secretary should be a matter for the Board as a whole.
Relating to the Non-Executive Directors the recommendations are:
Non-executive Directors should bring an independent judgment to bear on issues of
strategy, performance, resources, including key appointments, and standards of conduct.
The majority should be independent of the management and free from any business or
other relationship, which could materially interfere with the exercise of their independent
judgment, apart from their fees and shareholding. Their fees should reflect the time,
which they commit to the company.
Non-executive Directors should be appointed for specified terms and reappointment
should not be automatic.
Non-executive Directors should be selected through a formal process and both, this
process and their appointment, should be a matter for the Board as a whole.
For the Executive Directors the recommendations in the Cadbury Code of Best Practices are:
Director’s service contracts should not exceed three years without shareholders’ approval
There should be full and clear disclosure of their total emoluments and those of the
Chairman including pension contributions and stock options. Separate figures should be
given for salary and performance-related elements and the basis on which performance is
measured should be explained.
Executive Directors’ pay should be subject to the recommendations of a Remuneration
Committee made up wholly or mainly of Nonexecutive Directors.
Reporting and Controls the Cadbury Code of Best Practices stipulate that:
It is the Board’s duty to present a balanced and understandable assessment of the
company’s position.
The Board should ensure that an objective and professional relationship is maintained
with the Auditors.
The Board should establish an Audit Committee of at least three Non-executive Directors
with written terms of reference, which deal clearly with its authority and duties.
10
The Directors should explain their responsibility for preparing the accounts next to a
statement by the Auditors about their reporting responsibilities.
The Directors should report on the effectiveness of the company’s system of internal
control
The Directors should report that the business is a going concern, with supporting
assumptions or qualifications as necessary.
11