I would like to rate the text below

text number 2 "Squatting is not the answer"

- The first is the title
I don't like this title at all because if we haven't read it it will confuse us and lead
to boredom and unread.
- It is true that the author mentioned civil rights, I do not object when a person
wants to protect their belongings, but the punishment is heavier for the
homeless, I disagree. The homeless do not want to wander, because there is
nowhere to go that they have to squat and rest when they are tired after a long
journey. Besides, a person squatting does not mean that they are homeless,
simply because they like to do so, as long as they don't affect anyone.
- He argued that he should punish squats because he thinks they are taking things
from him and I see no love, they squatting does not mean they are homeless and
it also means they are peeking look at other people's property
- The author's bringing up the situation of homeless people jumping in line or
whether they enter the house after the death of their owner is quite good but not
convincing enough. The author has forgotten it is very important that any
evidence presented must go with a reliable source to be able to convince the
reader.
- I think the author is really too prejudiced against homeless people, not knowing
what they did wrong with him and letting him become like that. He always puts
out statements but has no real proof such as beats and punk and I don't like this.
- He gives a variety of conditions but I don't see any one source so I can't believe it